Facebook Wins $873 Million Lawsuit Against Spammer
damn_registrars writes "A US District judge has awarded $873 million dollars to Facebook in a default judgment against a spammer who sent messages to Facebook users about drugs and sex. This is the highest award so far in a civil suit under the CAN-SPAM Act."
Except it won't. It's too much. Basic psychology dictates that once you get above a certain risk people will start to ignore it because there's no difference between that and "everything". For people who don't have a great deal to start with losing everything isn't that big a deal. An amount that's a real tangible quantity that someone could conceivably earn is actually a bigger discouragement because people can imagine losing it, and that will put them off because if they can imagine themselves earning it they can envisage themselves losing it.
I'm not suggesting that it should have been any lower of course. I just think we need to be pragmatic about what a punishment is. If we want it to be something that puts other people off doing the same thing then we could think up something better.
http://twitter.com/onion2k
but from what I've seen, they get overturned, brought down to a reasonable level, or end upo being way more than the person can afford... which actually doesnt send a very good statement at all.
On the other hand... screw it, take his kidney.
There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
This appears to be a default judgment against a non-US entity. Is this so much different from the much-derided judgment against Spamhaus?
The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
Yep, and take photos of it.
And then post those photos.
And tag the participants.
And set up a group for Rollers-over-and-Takers-of-It.
1) Start spamable website
2) ???
3) Profit
"When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
I am not sure why, but I find it comical that "Facebook" said something... although it would have been funnier had it said "blah blah blah," posted Facebook on the Associated Press's wall.
SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP) â" Facebook has won a $873 million judgment against a Canadian man who bombarded users with millions of unsolicited messages about drugs and sex.
U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel signed the default judgment Friday, resolving a lawsuit that Facebook filed in August against Adam Guerbuez of Montreal and his business, Atlantis Blue Capital.
Facebook alleged that Guerbuez had fooled users into revealing their passwords so he could send out more than 4 million messages that included promotions for marijuana. Guerbuez could not be located for comment.
The Palo Alto, Calif.-based company predicted the judgment will be difficult to collect, but is hoping that its size discourages future abuses at its site.
So the standard cost of a foreigner sending me spam is ~$200 per message if they don't show up to court?
Also Facebook, please don't file lawsuits that you don't expect to have any direct impact. The courts are busy enough without you.
This is a default judgment against a foreign entity which undoubtedly is nothing more than an empty shell corporation with no assets. There is a reason they didn't bother to come and defend this action - the judgment is uncollectable. Talk about your pyrrhic victories.
Now if Facebook will just forward their bank account information to Nigeria I'm sure the spammer will send them the money plus a large fee
Since you added them as friends, and can control what you see from each user, it's not really "Spam", is it?
Your half-hearted attempt to be a cool hater is recognized, but ultimately fails.
In a strange coincidence, the odds of Facebook collecting any money from the spammer are also 873-million to one.
Hypothetically, if the $837M judgment could be collected, who would receive it, Facebook or the users who were spammed? (I only ask in an attempt to be less cynical.) I mean, sure, Facebook might have lost a few users due to the spam, and there in had a reduction in the subsequent ad revenue, but $837M worth? It seems to me they're being rewarded for allowing someone to exploit their system...
Same name, same city.
This is a story from 2003 http://www.montrealmirror.com/ARCHIVES/2003/091803/news2.html