Slashdot Mirror


Earliest LHC Restart Slated For Late Summer 2009

gaijinsr writes "The damage done in what CERN calls the 'S34 Incident' (and what other people call a major explosion in the cryogenics system) is much more serious than originally admitted: The earliest possible restart date is late summer next year, but with some proposed improvements to avoid repetitions of the incident, it looks more like 2010. They kept this pretty quiet up to now, not the kind of information policy I would expect from CERN."

40 of 229 comments (clear)

  1. Yay! by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny

    The universe is saved for a couple of more years! Now's the time to form our new national holiday "Beat the Hell out of the Atheist Murderous Universe-destroying Physicists Day".

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Yay! by stfvon007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So until the LHC becomes active, if there is the chance it will destroy the earth, no matter how slight, does that mean until its active the world is both destroyed and not destroyed? (AKA the cat in the box)

      --
      All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
    2. Re:Yay! by JavaBear · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean like Hicks and Bosons getting hot and heavy under pressure?

  2. Fortune cookie - fitting by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The current fortune cookie at the end of pages is somehow very fitting:

    " The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent. -- Sagan"

    1. Re:Fortune cookie - fitting by Spatial · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ah, now I see. The black hole will be arranged such that there will be two cars in every pot. It's a method of expressing compression ratio without involving the Library of Congress.

    2. Re:Fortune cookie - fitting by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it's probably more related to the THC

    3. Re:Fortune cookie - fitting by Strep · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We could go for THC related and have pot in every garage!

  3. My prediction by Kamokazi · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet the first time it is actually used in a full power experiment will be December 21, 2012.

    --
    As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    1. Re:My prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      the Mayan calendar merely resets at that date. similar to how computers were expected to reset at y2k, it was not that they expected the world to end they just did not include dates after that much like our calendar does not include specifically year numbers for after 9999(unless you count adding a digit but in that case you would expect the current year to be specified as 02008). http://www.xkcd.com/509/ is somewhat relevant.

    2. Re:My prediction by 4D6963 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But if not for that date, then when else would we set our upcoming Impending Doom day? We need those for, you know, having the feeling of being at the ends of times and therefore on a sort of historical cutting edge, rather than in the middle of a long era during which our precise time isn't much more important than any other time in history.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    3. Re:My prediction by Kamokazi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's one of the common apocalypse dates. It started with the Mayan calendar, but it also applies to some chinese fortune telling book, and one of the major Nostradamus types also predicted it as well. What's funny is there is a web crawler bot program used to predict stock market trends that also predicts this date, and supposedly this system predicted 9-11 90 days before it happened.

      Not that I buy any of that bullshit..I was just poking fun.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    4. Re:My prediction by rxmd · · Score: 2, Informative

      the Mayan calendar merely resets at that date. similar to how computers were expected to reset at y2k, it was not that they expected the world to end they just did not include dates after that much like our calendar does not include specifically year numbers for after 9999

      Actually it's even less catastrophic than that. The Mayan long count calendar is based on a hierarchical system of cycles, called kin (1 day), winal (20 days), tun (18 winal), katun (20 tun) and baktun (20 katun). Dates are indicated by giving the position in the relative cycle, so today, November 27, 2008, would usually be quoted as 12.19.15.15.15 in the Long Count calendar. You can check out the conversion formula e.g. in the source code for Fourmilab's calendar converter.

      The five-position notation for the long count has a cycle length of 2,880,000 days, or approximately 7885 years, ranging from 11 August 3113 BC (0.0.0.0.0) to October 12, 4772 (19.19.19.17.19). If that isn't enough, there are higher-order cycles as well - a pictun of 20 baktun with a cycle length of some 150000 years, a kalabtun of 20 pictun with a cycle length of 3.15 million years and so on. These are conventionally omitted in notation, because dates from these cycles are rarely met in Mayan astrology (or elsewhere for that matter), but there is a mechanism for expressing them.

      Thursday, December 20, 2012 is 12.19.19.17.19, and all that happens on December 21 is that all cycles reset and the baktun gets incremented by one, to 13.0.0.0.0. Some New Age freaks interpreted this as the end of the world because of a rather arcane interpretation of the significance of the 13th baktun cycle in a previous world, but even in 4772 the calendar won't "overflow", it will just shift to the next higher-order cycle.

      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
  4. Information policy by The_Wilschon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They kept this pretty quiet up to now, not the kind of information policy I would expect from CERN.

    Ummmm, perhaps scientists don't like to make statements that they aren't reasonably sure of? If there were still some disagreement or doubt about this timetable, I would fully expect them to keep it internal, and would be disappointed if they made a public statement prematurely. It's not like this timetable is exactly time critical today or anything...

    --
    SIGSEGV caught, terminating

    wait... not that kind of sig.
    1. Re:Information policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is a work funded by taxpaid dollars, so it should be kept open and transparent. The author of the article is right in this premise.

      But I disagree strongly with her perception of the situation. CERN's earlier statements have only been that they did not know how long repairs would take, but that the earliest LHC could possibly restart would be late spring 2009. This is the first time to my knowledge that they have given an estimate of when they actually expect the accelerator to be ready. There was nothing hidden or hushed up about this.

    2. Re:Information policy by girlintraining · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The submitters original comment was about how this doesn't seem like CERNs typical "information policy". You put this down as your subject line and then stated that this release of information may have been delayed "perhaps scientists don't like to make statements that they aren't reasonably sure of?" -- My reply was merely to point out an alternative possible explanation, namely that the delay in the release of information may have been motivated by politics. The scientists working on the project likely don't have such motivations, but the people who are providing the funding for this project certainly do, as would those managing the project (and thus responsible for press releases). I'm sure I don't need to tell you of all people the role politics plays in funding of scientific research. -_-

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    3. Re:Information policy by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe they had to take some big pieces of machinery apart before making a definitive statement. That takes time.

      Even worse than a late statement would be making a statement then changing it a couple of weeks later.

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:Information policy by rev_karol · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well I can tell you that the rest of us at CERN were kept quite in the dark by the management too. There are pictures of the cryo incident which they won't allow to be released.

      The LHC is its own prototype. Similar beam related incidents happened at Fermilab. It's shit but it happens, and they handled it dreadfully.

      Some big numbers were thrown out there about how much the accident will cost, but in real terms it comes our as a very small fraction compared to overall LHC costs.

      Everyone at CERN is very disappointed about it, naturally, but it's up to us now to better prepare ourselves for the new startup.

    5. Re:Information policy by owlnation · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is a work funded by taxpaid euros. There, fixed it for you

      Francs. The currency of Switzerland is the Franc. Not in the Eurozone, not in the EU, not in much at all actually.

      Though, some of the LHC's funding does come from some Eurozone countries. (and part of the LHC is in France too)

    6. Re:Information policy by neuromanc3r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If we all are happily nit-picking, I think you should have a look at the Cern member states . While you are right, major parts of Cern are located in Switzerland, the majority of taxpaid $currency used for its funding is definitely Euro, not Franc (and saying that "some of the LHC's funding does come from the Eurozone countries" is a ridiculous understatement...)

    7. Re:Information policy by girlintraining · · Score: 2, Informative

      The United States made an attempt at building something similar to the LHC several years ago but funding was cut. It was viewed at the time as a major setback in science and would lead to a brain drain in the United States as scientists went overseas where they could be with better equipment. Funding for the LHC was nearly cut several times amid cries that funding should be focused on "more important" science such as global warming. Part of the reason it got built was precisely because it could show that the EU succeeded where the US failed -- and there's been plenty of rivalry there. Arguably, the reason the EU was brought into existence was to compete with the US. There's a lot of pride tied into making this thing work.

      There was a huge political debacle about where the LHC should be built that prevented its construction for several years. So while you can point and say "see? Look at all the cooperation!" the truth is that cooperation took a lot of time and a lot of negotiation. It didn't just happen because scientists are agreeable, friendly sorts that are great with people. And nationalism did, and continues to play a role in the LHCs funding and operational details. That's the nature of international politics -- everybody wants something in return, because there's only one Higgs-boson but there's several hundred positions at the LHC and only a few of them will be paraded through the streets when it's finally found while the rest will toil in obscurity. If you think the nationality of those people isn't important, you're in a dream world. The nationalities of those involved have been very carefully selected.

      Bottom line is that they are under a lot of pressure to perform and while it's easy for you and I to understand (as engineers) that these are normal problems... How does it look for the politicians in the middle of a global recession to be looking for "god particles"? Not very and if you were running the show you'd be damn stupid not to be out there glad-handing the purse-holders and assuring them everything is fine. Politics is the reason the LHC could be built in the first place, politics is infused in every major organization -- even scientific ones.

      So try and be less idealistic and more realistic. Now, again -- I'm not saying this is why the press release was delayed. I'm just saying it's as plausible a theory as the rest.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    8. Re:Information policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You are so full of nonsense.

      LHC is NOT a EU project (EU as European Union).

      LHC is a CERN project and CERN is not a EU body.

      CERN is an international organisation (like Interpol, WHO, UN, etc.), located on the border between France and Switzerland (Switzerland is NOT part of the EU either).
      Buildings are mostly in Switzerland, while most of the tunnel is in France.

      CERN predates LHC of something like 30 years.
      The LHC is built in the tunnel used previously (for 10 to 15 years) by the former main CERN project (LEP: Large Electron Positron Collider).

      So try and be less clueless.

    9. Re:Information policy by Matthias+Wiesmann · · Score: 4, Informative

      While the LHC is indeed not an EU project, most of girlintraining's remain valid. Politics and national pride play an important part in the internal workings of CERN, and could well explain the communication policy.

      Calling people full of nonsense because they did not get some details right is not very polite, dear Anonymous Coward. Actually, there are quite a few building in Prévessin. And while CERN is definitely not an EU project, it is different from the WHO, or the UN in the sense that it has a geographic definition, it is called the European Organization for Nuclear Research. Some of the funding for CERN related projects, like the grids efforts, comes directly from the EU.

      So please try to be less impolite and arrogant...

  5. What do you expect? by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The LHC has been longer in development than the WWW exists (there are screenshots around from the "first website ever" that had design drawings of the atlas detector on it.

    It has happened. They got to fix it, piece by piece. Do you really need a "what cf flanges we replaced today" blog?

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:What do you expect? by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Informative

      Karma whoring linky here.

    2. Re:What do you expect? by bckrispi · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Not only that, but the WWW was invented for the purpose of supporting the work being done on the LHC.

      Many of the discussions of the future at CERN and the LHC era end with the question - "Yes, but how will we ever keep track of such a large project?" This proposal provides an answer to such questions. Firstly, it discusses the problem of information access at CERN. Then, it introduces the idea of linked information systems, and compares them with less flexible ways of finding information.

      It then summarises my short experience with non-linear text systems known as hypertext, describes what CERN needs from such a system, and what industry may provide. Finally, it suggests steps we should take to involve ourselves with hypertext now, so that individually and collectively we may understand what we are creating.

      This being said, I'd say that the LHC has already paid for itself a thousand times over.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
  6. With the data... by FrameRotBlues · · Score: 4, Interesting
    They've got a lot of data to figure out what probably happened. But, FTFA:

    Most likely cause : an electric arc due to rupture of the interconnection. Unfortunately this is difficult to prove, since the whole dipole interconnect was 'vaporised' during the event!

  7. Cut 'em some slack by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 5, Funny

    Keep in mind all information coming out of there has to escape the black hole's pull.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  8. Some Further Info by ruuskado · · Score: 5, Informative

    I once worked at on the LHC at CERN and still have some contacts there and in a couple of conversations have come across some rather interesting bits of information. The fault has been isolated to a single connector, however the analysis was rather difficult as a large amount of the suspect conductor was vaporized by the current surge. The wires are supposed to carry 8,700-Amps!!! at full power, the intrinsic resistance in this particular bad joint caused some localized heating which then caused a portion of the conductor to no longer be superconducting. all of the current then passed through a sudden, unexpected load and voile, lots of heat, boiling helium and a chain reaction of nastiness. Looks like the pressure discs ruptured as expected, but they were overwhelmed by the sheer amount of boiling Helium, 6-Tons!, and the vacuum vessel buckled and ruptured causing other magnets to quench. the sheer force of the expansions knocked more than 20 of these steering magnets off of their supports. Slightly more problematic then first reports indeed. There was always an expectation of shutting down the beam for the Winter as the cost of electricity for the experiment is a major operational consideration and rises prohibitively for the experiment during peak heating season. Hope that they can fix their problems and catch any other flaws before they attempt to ramp up again. Here's to the exploration of fundamental principles.

  9. It didn't explode, by KiwiCanuck · · Score: 2, Funny

    it just heated up too fast and expanded too quickly. ~:-)

  10. The beam is like small bomb. by mbone · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The beam would make a good weapon (if the LHC a bad weapons system).

    The beam was 200 MJoules, the equivalent of 48 kilo's of TNT. That's a pretty good bomb if it should hit you.

    (Note that there are 2 beams; it is not clear to me if that is the energy per beam on in total.)

  11. Summer Blockbusters by MaxwellEdison · · Score: 3, Funny

    The repairs will actually be done a little sooner, but they pushed back the release date so they wouldn't have to fight with Star Trek, Transformers, or Harry friggin Potter. Just be lucky Iron Man is waiting until 2010 or we'd never get any sciencing or universe imploding done.

    --
    -=Bang Bang=-
  12. Some notes by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative

    The initial cause of the incident was probably a bad weld in a busbar joint. But they'll never know; the entire busbar was vaporized when it lost superconductivity under load.

    The quench protection system wasn't designed to properly handle a failure of the superconducting busbar between two magnets. There's an elaborate system to dump the energy from a magnet that's starting to lose superconductivity into a big resistor bank. They expected occasional problems within the magnet windings, but this failure wasn't in a winding. The quench system is being redesigned.

    The cryogenic system needs many more pressure relief valves. In this event, 6 tons of liquid helium was vaporized, which is 30,000 cubic meters at 1 atmosphere. That much helium couldn't get out of the existing relief valves fast enough, sizable parts of the plumbing were damaged, and magnets were pushed off their mounts. Now that was just bad pressure-vessel design. They should have had enough relief valves or rupture discs for the worst-case scenario. That would have localized the problem. Given the huge amount of energy in the magnets, in close proximity to liquid helium, in an experimental machine, this could not be a totally unexpected possibility.

    More relief valves are going in, which means the whole ring has to be brought up to room temperature and atmospheric pressure for plumbing work. Then the whole commissioning process has to be repeated, which takes months.

    The tunnels are empty of people when power is on, because if all that helium vents, the air is unbreathable. But this event was big enough that it could have affected people in experiment halls at tunnel level. If this had happened during actual use, people could have been killed.

    A magnet quench isn't supposed to be a big deal. Early design specs said that restarting after a magnet quench should only take a few hours. Oops.

  13. Re:Won't Ever Work by bitrex · · Score: 2, Funny

    God's design team tried to tell him the same thing after he insisted on creating man, and that worked out OK, didn't it?

  14. Some random points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work on one of the LHC experiments, so I'm posting anonymously.

    1) CERN's communication has been lacking. Especially in deleting reports immediately after the incident on their eLog that had been open. That was a black eye on their image.

    2) Plans change as more information comes in, so no one should be surprised by initial statements saying "The earliest possible date is several months" (which would be the case if no magnets needed replacing) followed by Spring '09 if everything goes well. This is now followed by Summer '09 to just repair the problems and late '09/ early '10 if remedial actions are taken.

    3) CERN is changing directors in a month or so. The new director will make the decision of cautious startup vs. remediation and more aggressive startup. My expectation is the latter.

    The world can wait an extra year for these results. I feel bad for the students and post-docs who are waiting for the data to emerge, though.

  15. Whatever. by IWood · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've got my crowbar. Bring it on.

  16. We will never see it work by magi · · Score: 4, Funny

    LHC is obviously a doomsday machine. Turning it on will immediately destroy humankind in all the parallel universes where it works. Therefore, in the universes where we stay alive, we will always see it fail. The failure proves the parallel structure of the universe.

  17. Use the date, not the season by Mag7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While most of the world's population lives in the northern hemisphere admittedly, can we please reduce the ambiguity by referring to an approximate date (e.g. August 2009) instead of the season?

  18. Some More Random Points by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 3, Funny

    I work on the LHC experiments as well, so I'm posting anonymously, too.

    1) The failure of the flux capacitor was actually the real cause of the shutdown (although this will never be released due to the humiliation that would be heaped upon them for such a simple mistake - see below).

    2) Apparently no one told them that when you accelerated it beyond 88 mph (within the limit of their test runs) it would create a hole in time/space through which a moderately-priced novelty sports car (or something of equivalent mass) could travel.

    3) They are currently searching 1985, 1955, and 1885 for the components that they lost as a result of the failure. They also plan to search 2015. Eventually.

    4) They are currently in contract negotiations with Michael J. Fox, Christopher Lloyd and various other experts in the field. They expect that once the contracts are finalized the solution will be achieved between 108 and 118 minutes.

    --
    Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  19. Re:Anthropic principle by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Do you actually believe that incoherent, illogical, unscientific, unprovable baloney?

  20. Re:"Slated for Late Summer 2009" by lloydchristmas759 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, and we'll have to wait for service pack 2 before it's really stable.

    --
    I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous.