Slashdot Mirror


Sweet Molecule Could Lead Us To Alien Life

Matt_dk writes "Scientists have detected an organic sugar molecule that is directly linked to the origin of life in a region of our galaxy where habitable planets could exist. The international team of researchers used the IRAM radio telescope in France to detect the molecule in a massive star forming region of space, some 26,000 light years from Earth."

72 comments

  1. um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...sweet

  2. Do the aliens taste sweet? by dmbasso · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh, I see another PETA game coming...

    --
    `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    1. Re:Do the aliens taste sweet? by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, I see another PETA game coming...

      You mean People Eating Tasty Aliens?

    2. Re:Do the aliens taste sweet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is not a joking matter.

      We'd better be concerned whether or not there is an AETP (Aliens for the Ethical Treatment of Pets) because, you know, we'll make great pets.

    3. Re:Do the aliens taste sweet? by giantweevil · · Score: 0

      You call excessively violent, easily angered things pets?

      You must own a pit bull.

      --
      Disregard the above.
    4. Re:Do the aliens taste sweet? by tyrione · · Score: 1

      Or the truly subversive meaning of PETA:

      Premenstrual Extraterrestrial Tree Activists.

    5. Re:Do the aliens taste sweet? by Sebilrazen · · Score: 1

      You call excessively violent, easily angered things pets?

      You must own a pit bull.

      ...or a certain Alaskan Governor.

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    6. Re:Do the aliens taste sweet? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Stranger: Well, it isn't all of us that are made for wild beasts, and that's what it's got to be. That's why I watched you. Watched you. All these little office workers that used to live in these houses -- they'd be no good. They haven't any stuff to 'em. They just used to run off to work. I've seen hundreds of 'em, running wild to catch their commuters' train in the morning for fear that they'd get canned if they didn't; running back at night afraid that they won't be in time for dinner. Lives insured and a little invested in case of accidents. Yeah, and on Sundays, worried about the hereafter. The Martians will be a godsend for those guys. Nice roomy cages, good food, careful breeding, no worries. Yeah, after a week or so chasing about the fields on empty stomachs they'll come and be glad to be caught.
      Pierson: You've thought it all out, haven't you?
      Stranger: Sure, you bet I have! And that isn't all. These Martians will make pets of some of them, train 'em to do tricks. Who knows? Get sentimental over the pet boy who grew up and had to be killed. Yeah. And some, maybe, they'll train to hunt us.
      Pierson: No, that's impossible. No human being....
      Stranger: Yes they will. There's men who'll do it gladly. If one of them ever comes after me, why....

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    7. Re:Do the aliens taste sweet? by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      I can only hope that maybe martians will do better than we've done.

    8. Re:Do the aliens taste sweet? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see another PETA game coming...

      If PETA were serious, they'd put 100% of their efforts into developing an ethically superior food that's cheaper and tastier than meat.

      They don't, so they're not.

      QED.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    9. Re:Do the aliens taste sweet? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      If PETA were serious, they'd put 100% of their efforts into developing an ethically superior food that's cheaper and tastier than meat. They don't, so they're not. QED.

      Disclaimer: I'm not a fan of PETA. I'm not even a vegetarian, but that's a crap argument, and slapping "QED" at the end doesn't make it more valid.

      Stupid fucking analogy coming up: Suppose I got my kicks by driving around residential streets at 110mph, and some do-gooder whined that it was ethically wrong because of the danger to residents and all the dead pensioners wrapped around my bumper. Would it be a valid response to say that the road safety campaigners should STFU until they come up with an ethically superior and cheaper alternative to running people over at high speed a la Death Race 2000?

      No, of course it wouldn't. PETA *could* argue (whether you or I agree or not) that eating animals is wrong, regardless of whether or not it was "tasty". Obviously it could be cool if they could come up with a really good meat substitute, but that's not their main aim.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    10. Re:Do the aliens taste sweet? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Obviously it could be cool if they could come up with a really good meat substitute, but that's not their main aim.

      Why do they put so many resources into advertising "Meat is Death" if they're not trying to convince people to stop eating meat?

      The fraction of people who eat meat "because it's death" is vanishingly small and would gladly switch if an alternative were available. But the alternative isn't Boca burgers and hummus because that doesn't meet the consumers' requirements. So, until such an alternative is available (I believe that's inevitable) most people will eat meat.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    11. Re:Do the aliens taste sweet? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Why do they put so many resources into advertising "Meat is Death" if they're not trying to convince people to stop eating meat?

      Where the heck did I imply that they weren't? Of course they are.

      The fraction of people who eat meat "because it's death" is vanishingly small

      Are you referring to a tiny percentage of people who like meat *because* it's dead animals? I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here(!)

      and would gladly switch if an alternative were available. But the alternative isn't Boca burgers and hummus because that doesn't meet the consumers' requirements. So, until such an alternative is available (I believe that's inevitable) most people will eat meat.

      Where do you draw the line with an acceptable alternative? PETA may argue (again, you might or might not agree) that current alternatives are good enough if you're aware of the suffering involved in the creation of meat.

      You can disagree, but that's still a valid perspective to argue from and therefore your glib argument that because PETA aren't devoting 100% of their effort to creating a perfect meat alternative they aren't serious is flawed. QED.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    12. Re:Do the aliens taste sweet? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      PETA may argue (again, you might or might not agree) that current alternatives are good enough if you're aware of the suffering involved in the creation of meat.

      Right, they do. But empirically lots of people are aware but do not change their eating habits because the alternatives don't meet their requirements. So my contention is that their base assumption is wrong, that education won't convert nearly enough people to attain their goals.

      And don't get hung up on 'qed', it was meant to be glib.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    13. Re:Do the aliens taste sweet? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      So my contention is that their base assumption is wrong

      That's your contention, and certainly arguable, but it's not an indisputable fact. So to imply that simply because PETA haven't based their strategy around it they aren't serious (your original point)... is incorrect (*my* original point!)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    14. Re:Do the aliens taste sweet? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      That's your contention, and certainly arguable, but it's not an indisputable fact.

      Well, how would one measure success then?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    15. Re:Do the aliens taste sweet? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      That's your contention, and certainly arguable, but it's not an indisputable fact.

      Well, how would one measure success then?

      No idea, and not my problem! Since you were the one whose an argument relied on this being clearly true, the onus is on you, not me. :)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    16. Re:Do the aliens taste sweet? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      No idea, and not my problem! Since you were the one whose an argument relied on this being clearly true, the onus is on you, not me. :)

      Meat sales continue to grow despite PETA's campaign. That's prima facia evidence their campaign is not having the impact desired (to get people to stop eating meat). You stated that this this was arguable, not an indisputable fact, so I was asking for how you'd make that argument, since it does seem to be an indisputable fact.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    17. Re:Do the aliens taste sweet? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Perhaps meat sales would have grown faster had PETA not campaigned. Perhaps they see it as a long-term campaign. Perhaps they *will* change their strategy in response to the evidence. Who knows?

      It's not indisputable.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  3. Another report ? by kasnol · · Score: 1, Funny

    Tired of hearing journals suggest places may have foreign life... wonder when will there be "concrete" evidence to show life from other planets ?

    Hopefully Soon ~

    1. Re:Another report ? by Fluffeh · · Score: 0

      I hardly think that if aliens want to announce their life to the rest of the universe it will be done through concrete slabs sent out into space - or concrete anything sent out into space for that matter.

      The evidence is much more likely to come through radio waves, not bits of concrete.

      PS. You aren't in an Austin Power movie, you can't use double quotes like that and get away with it on slashdot.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    2. Re:Another report ? by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      I thought the quotation marks were self-explanatory. He was referring to figurative concrete. Abstract concrete.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    3. Re:Another report ? by giantweevil · · Score: 1, Funny

      Metaphysical concrete, perhaps. But are we really talking about concrete here?

      Tell me about your mother.

      --
      Disregard the above.
    4. Re:Another report ? by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      Lots and lots of black monoliths. Though whether they where made of concrete, or even if they are concrete, can be debated.

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    5. Re:Another report ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS. You aren't in an Austin Power movie, you can't use double quotes like that and get away with it on slashdot.

      "So" "you" "don't" "like" "double" "quotes" "eh" "Fluffy" "?"

      "Well" "I'm" "using" "them" "!"

      "What" "are" "you" "planning" "to" "do" "about" "it" "?"

    6. Re:Another report ? by balbord · · Score: 1

      Haven't we determined already that radio waves degrade into noise in a couple of light years :/?

      --
      "If I have been able to see so far, It is because I went out and bought a damn binoculars" - Ze da Esquina
    7. Re:Another report ? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Don't you remember the story of Moses on the mountain coming back with rocks with messages on them? Sure, they were called stone tablets but who is to say they knew the difference between concrete and stone back then?

      -- When I make posts like this, I'm not as worried about offending religious zealots as I am the self proclaimed Atheist. Some people seem to be able to take a joke better then others.

  4. Powerful telescope by White+Flame · · Score: 0

    It can detect a molecule in a star 26kly away? Wow!

    1. Re:Powerful telescope by Psychotria · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, you know how things are. For simplification "the presence of..." or the "signature of" or whatever way you want to phrase it is dropped and implied. It's not incorrect to state something like "we detected the presence of the molecule H2O..." (for example). But you'd not say that, because H2O is a well-known molecule. You'd say something like "we detected H2O". If H2O was not a well-known molecule, then I guess you might say something like "we detected the molecule H2O" to define which molecule you detected.

    2. Re:Powerful telescope by RuBLed · · Score: 1, Funny

      No. It's your mom eating a cotton candy.

    3. Re:Powerful telescope by LingNoi · · Score: 0

      I think you're missing the GPs point, how can they detect a molecule 26,000 light years away.

    4. Re:Powerful telescope by Psychotria · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not missing the point. Detecting a molecule is very different to detecting the molecule. The word "molecule" does not have to be singular. I realise the GP was probably trying to be funny, or over-pedantic, but the semantics of the summary and the Prof quoted in the story do make sense and obviously does not mean a single molecule.

    5. Re:Powerful telescope by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was trying to be funny and over-pedantic, but "Scientists have detected an organic sugar molecule" still sounds quite singular to me, even though I do know that it means the presence of some quantity of that type of molecule.

    6. Re:Powerful telescope by gwait · · Score: 4, Informative

      By the light spectrum it emits.

      All molecules emit a very precise combination (or individual frequency) of light frequencies when enough energy is added to them.

      Think of different pure wavelengths of light as notes on a piano. Each unique atom and molecule produces it's own unique chord when energy is added.

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    7. Re:Powerful telescope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spectroscopy. Easy enough to pull off.

    8. Re:Powerful telescope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you ladies are done kissing, there's a nice discussion going on in the rest of the comments. Seriously, just STFU. Both of you...just...STFU.

    9. Re:Powerful telescope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      that's why you read the entire sentence:

      Scientists have detected an organic sugar molecule that is directly linked to the origin of life, in a region of our galaxy where habitable planets could exist.

      "an organic sugar molecule that is directly linked to the origin of life" does not mean a single physical molecule. anyone who's not contextually impaired would understand that they're talking about finding a particular chemical, glycolaldehyde, which is in fact a molecule directly linked to the origin of life.

    10. Re:Powerful telescope by scottrocket · · Score: 1

      Mis

    11. Re:Powerful telescope by pipatron · · Score: 1

      If you ladies are done kissing

      pix or it didn't happen

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    12. Re:Powerful telescope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could also be a linear combination of the spectra of simple molecules.

    13. Re:Powerful telescope by F'Nok · · Score: 1

      That's not how it works.

      The spectrum from a molecule is not the sum of its parts, but unique to that molecule.

      If you hash a phrase, you do not get the same result as if you added the hashes of each of the words that make the phrase.

      You're trying to over simplify.

    14. Re:Powerful telescope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't claim that the simple molecules would be parts of the 'detected' molecule, just that some combination of molecules known-to-exist-in-space might match the observed spectra within its observational error bars, simply due to the sheer number of possible such combinations.

  5. Alien Soylent Green by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 0
    tastes better!

    Add yeast and you can have alien brew!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Alien Soylent Green by aikodude · · Score: 1

      you can have alien brew!

      Ah can't have alien. I may look bug, but I can't chew, brew! I only has plink-ton. Have ya got inny plink-ton?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdVHZwI8pcA

  6. Re:What about life is alien to you? by v1 · · Score: 1

    We already know where to find the chicks - easy mob on level 3, behind Castle Darkwood, just West of the barn.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  7. ET want swweeeeeeetsss by syousef · · Score: 1

    No phone home. Here I get swweeeeeeeeettts. *sticks up a bony middle finger*

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  8. Re:What about life is alien to you? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 3, Funny

    I tried but they're all at home leveling up to 80.

  9. Who would have guessed by GrumpySteen · · Score: 5, Funny

    That a Milky Way has sugar in it

  10. Overlords by Narpak · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I for one welcome our sweetness based Overlords! Their Vanguard the "Hello Kitty" have already spread their tendrils throughout society and Earth is now ready for the the invasion!

    Hail our new Sweetness in chief!

    1. Re:Overlords by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      Their Vanguard the "Hello Kitty" have already spread their tendrils throughout society

      Whoever has a Hello Kitty + Dear Daniel matching pair, gets the babe. (The cuteness factor is indescribable.)

      Let's stock up on the toys, Slashdot residents!

  11. It seems unlikely by s4ltyd0g · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A massive star forming region, hardly seems a conducive place for life to form.

    1. Re:It seems unlikely by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      Yes and no.

      In that context, these simple molecules are probably created by radiation catalized reaction rather than life (it is known to be possible). However, while the place is probably still hostile to life, those organic molecules that will be still around when the place would cool down might become the initial construction set of a new life.

  12. It's not sugar by Sentry21 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This just in - scientists have also discovered high fructose corn syrup, which could lead us to fat, ugly alien life.

  13. But Does It Taste Like Cinnamon? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 0

    Humanity needs to know NOW: if we develop space travel, will this substance enable enough limited prescience in human minds to get a first post on Slashdot?

  14. 52000 years after the fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    duh

  15. Fat, ugly alien life by troll8901 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's the Vogons. Don't let them read their poems to you. Run!

  16. In other news... by K3ba · · Score: 1

    In other news, the cleaning lady has now visited the site, and the mould has been cleaned of the lens.

    Given it has now been a while since breakfast for the scientists, the sugar levels are now dropping.



    Did the OP actually expect anything other than disbelief and notsofunnyafterall posts in reply? *sigh*

    --
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.
  17. I, for one, by mvanvoorden · · Score: 1

    welcome our sweet overlords. And please bring some of those Ol' Janx Spirit-filled chocolates, I ran out.

  18. Sweet nibblets! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (or am I admitting too much here?)

  19. Inter-Stellar Communications by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    No, no, it's 52000 years and 5 seconds. You see, it takes 5 seconds to type the message (assuming the alien didn't read TFA).

    Article

    Of course, if a TCP retransmission occurs, you'll need to add another 52000 years for every round trip.

  20. I see a giant spider... by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    Tintin and the Shooting Star.

    Time to invent, patent, copyright, and market the TELESCOPE WIPERS (r,c,tm).

  21. I was wondering... by mvanvoorden · · Score: 1

    ...couldn't it be that they located some candy from the toolbag? You know those women always put everything in their bags. I'm just waiting for the next item claiming that aliens also get their period, because they found a bloody tampon.

  22. Good!! We just discovered the first... by GerardAtJob · · Score: 1

    ... evidence of a Monolith Burger "near" our galaxy! :D

    --
    I can't call that English ;-)
    1. Re:Good!! We just discovered the first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I used to love that place until I got a part-time job there. That manager was such a dick and the working conditions were terrible.

      ahh... thanks for the memories, makes me want to play SQ4 again.

  23. Solved! by s1lverl0rd · · Score: 1

    Hungry astronauts/kosmonauts could simply open the window and take a bite!

  24. Umm guys? by pugugly · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The observations confirmed the presence of three lines of glycolaldegyde towards the most central part of the core of the region"

    Three lines?

    Umm I hate to mention it, but that's not sugar . . .

    Pug

    --
    An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
  25. Inside me there's a thin alien bursting to get out by Attila · · Score: 1

    ... but I keep it sedated with chocolate.

    --
    Dear Will, the plums were poisoned. -- Cheese Club
  26. Not Even Correlation by DynaSoar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just because a substance is implicated in a particular phenomenon does not mean that the phenomenon is present where ever that substance is. There are compounds that are human neuromodulators that are also found in plants. Nobody would seriously take this to mean plants require neuromodulators.

    TFA even states that the same compound was found in a region of space NOT likely to be conducive to the formation of life. TFA goes on blithely unaware of this statement before and after its appearance, because to be otherwise accurate TFA would have to simply state an organic compound found in some regions of space has been found in another.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  27. Homer Simpson says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Mmmmm, intergalactic doughnut"