Sweet Molecule Could Lead Us To Alien Life
Matt_dk writes "Scientists have detected an organic sugar molecule that is directly linked to the origin of life in a region of our galaxy where habitable planets could exist. The international team of researchers used the IRAM radio telescope in France to detect the molecule in a massive star forming region of space, some 26,000 light years from Earth."
...sweet
Oh, I see another PETA game coming...
`echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
Tired of hearing journals suggest places may have foreign life... wonder when will there be "concrete" evidence to show life from other planets ?
Hopefully Soon ~
We already know where to find the chicks - easy mob on level 3, behind Castle Darkwood, just West of the barn.
I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
No phone home. Here I get swweeeeeeeeettts. *sticks up a bony middle finger*
These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
Well, you know how things are. For simplification "the presence of..." or the "signature of" or whatever way you want to phrase it is dropped and implied. It's not incorrect to state something like "we detected the presence of the molecule H2O..." (for example). But you'd not say that, because H2O is a well-known molecule. You'd say something like "we detected H2O". If H2O was not a well-known molecule, then I guess you might say something like "we detected the molecule H2O" to define which molecule you detected.
I tried but they're all at home leveling up to 80.
No. It's your mom eating a cotton candy.
I'm not missing the point. Detecting a molecule is very different to detecting the molecule. The word "molecule" does not have to be singular. I realise the GP was probably trying to be funny, or over-pedantic, but the semantics of the summary and the Prof quoted in the story do make sense and obviously does not mean a single molecule.
That a Milky Way has sugar in it
A massive star forming region, hardly seems a conducive place for life to form.
Yes, I was trying to be funny and over-pedantic, but "Scientists have detected an organic sugar molecule" still sounds quite singular to me, even though I do know that it means the presence of some quantity of that type of molecule.
This just in - scientists have also discovered high fructose corn syrup, which could lead us to fat, ugly alien life.
By the light spectrum it emits.
All molecules emit a very precise combination (or individual frequency) of light frequencies when enough energy is added to them.
Think of different pure wavelengths of light as notes on a piano. Each unique atom and molecule produces it's own unique chord when energy is added.
Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
you can have alien brew!
Ah can't have alien. I may look bug, but I can't chew, brew! I only has plink-ton. Have ya got inny plink-ton?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdVHZwI8pcA
that's why you read the entire sentence:
"an organic sugar molecule that is directly linked to the origin of life" does not mean a single physical molecule. anyone who's not contextually impaired would understand that they're talking about finding a particular chemical, glycolaldehyde, which is in fact a molecule directly linked to the origin of life.
Mis
It's the Vogons. Don't let them read their poems to you. Run!
In other news, the cleaning lady has now visited the site, and the mould has been cleaned of the lens.
Given it has now been a while since breakfast for the scientists, the sugar levels are now dropping.
Did the OP actually expect anything other than disbelief and notsofunnyafterall posts in reply? *sigh*
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.
welcome our sweet overlords. And please bring some of those Ol' Janx Spirit-filled chocolates, I ran out.
Their Vanguard the "Hello Kitty" have already spread their tendrils throughout society
Whoever has a Hello Kitty + Dear Daniel matching pair, gets the babe. (The cuteness factor is indescribable.)
Let's stock up on the toys, Slashdot residents!
No, no, it's 52000 years and 5 seconds. You see, it takes 5 seconds to type the message (assuming the alien didn't read TFA).
Article
Of course, if a TCP retransmission occurs, you'll need to add another 52000 years for every round trip.
Tintin and the Shooting Star.
Time to invent, patent, copyright, and market the TELESCOPE WIPERS (r,c,tm).
...couldn't it be that they located some candy from the toolbag? You know those women always put everything in their bags. I'm just waiting for the next item claiming that aliens also get their period, because they found a bloody tampon.
... evidence of a Monolith Burger "near" our galaxy! :D
I can't call that English
Hungry astronauts/kosmonauts could simply open the window and take a bite!
If you ladies are done kissing
pix or it didn't happen
c++;
"The observations confirmed the presence of three lines of glycolaldegyde towards the most central part of the core of the region"
Three lines?
Umm I hate to mention it, but that's not sugar . . .
Pug
An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
... but I keep it sedated with chocolate.
Dear Will, the plums were poisoned. -- Cheese Club
Just because a substance is implicated in a particular phenomenon does not mean that the phenomenon is present where ever that substance is. There are compounds that are human neuromodulators that are also found in plants. Nobody would seriously take this to mean plants require neuromodulators.
TFA even states that the same compound was found in a region of space NOT likely to be conducive to the formation of life. TFA goes on blithely unaware of this statement before and after its appearance, because to be otherwise accurate TFA would have to simply state an organic compound found in some regions of space has been found in another.
"I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
That's not how it works.
The spectrum from a molecule is not the sum of its parts, but unique to that molecule.
If you hash a phrase, you do not get the same result as if you added the hashes of each of the words that make the phrase.
You're trying to over simplify.