Slashdot Mirror


FSF Files Suit Against Cisco For GPL Violations

Brett Smith writes "This morning the Free Software Foundation filed suit against Cisco for violations of the GPL and LGPL. There's a blog post with background about the case. The full complaint is available too." The short version, as excerpted by reader byolinux, is that "in the course of distributing various products under the Linksys brand Cisco has violated the licenses of many programs on which the FSF holds copyright, including GCC, binutils, and the GNU C Library. In doing so, Cisco has denied its users their right to share and modify the software."

23 of 409 comments (clear)

  1. This is why copyright laws are bad by Throtex · · Score: 5, Funny

    They allow abusive entities such as the Free Software Foundation to go after Cisco. If only the software was distributed without cumbersome GLP and LGPL licensing restrictions, and was truly free like software wants to be, then Cisco wouldn't have been forced to violate the licenses.

    For shame.

    1. Re:This is why copyright laws are bad by jalet · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you joking ?

      --
      Votez ecolo : Chiez dans l'urne !
    2. Re:This is why copyright laws are bad by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dammit, if you had kept that going longer than 3 minutes i would have had some entertainment for the afternoon

    3. Re:This is why copyright laws are bad by calmofthestorm · · Score: 4, Funny

      I agree, copyright law is stifling innovation by preventing large American corporations from using the work of small, independent inventors without contributing in kind. Clearly there should be a fee to copyright works, to ensure that only properly-licensed corporations, using licensed, trusted compilers, can produce them.

      I'm Ted Stevens, convicted felon, and I approved this message*!

      * California v. Drew Disclaimer: No I'm not.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    4. Re:This is why copyright laws are bad by LtGordon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Replied Cisco, "Curse you, Stallman!"

    5. Re:This is why copyright laws are bad by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 5, Funny

      Replied Cisco, "Curse you, Stallman!"

      Actually, their exact words were, "Curse you, Stallman! We'd have gotten away with it, too; if it wasn't for you meddling kids!"

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    6. Re:This is why copyright laws are bad by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

      How "free" is your iPhone?

      Free as in stolen.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    7. Re:This is why copyright laws are bad by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      All the customers of their product will also need to pay an extra 25% of the cost because they need to add redoing the wheel software development. Before Linksys started to use the GNU tools Hubs even small ones were expensive. After Linksys incorporated GNU you can for relatively cheap get a Router, Switch and Firewall which is good enough for most people and small businesses. If you choose GNU as a developer you really forfeit a lot of your rights to your code. So if a big corporation takes your code and uses it on a loophole in the licence, you don't have much recourse.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:This is why copyright laws are bad by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Funny

      We woosh that the RIAA would offer music under the GPL!

    9. Re:This is why copyright laws are bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's what she said!

      Oh...uhhh, nevermind.

    10. Re:This is why copyright laws are bad by calmofthestorm · · Score: 4, Funny

      I suppose you're right. It's especially important that Cisco use quality, trusted software developed in-house or offshore, rather than trusting the danger-fraught open source community. Even aside from patent violations and other blatant disregard of others' IP rights, and the far lower quality of code produced by enthusiastic volunteers as compared to paid, apathetic employees, can you really trust that these self-described "hackers" haven't put in backdoors for their Russian friends? There's just no way to know with open source, and given all this, and studies showing that open source has an astronomically higher total cost of ownership, this is probably the last straw.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    11. Re:This is why copyright laws are bad by hansamurai · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stallman's beard?

    12. Re:This is why copyright laws are bad by dkleinsc · · Score: 2, Funny

      That sounds like it ought to be an exclamation, along the lines of "Stallman's beard! I wasn't expecting that error."

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  2. Re:The thing about these lawsuits by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You are an enabler, you enable people to avoid RTFA :D

  3. The horror by LtGordon · · Score: 3, Funny

    You guys just don't get it. The FSF protects software. Then Cisco went and muddied it all up like your sister's proprietary, tattooed boyfriend. Now every time you use GCC, it'll be thinking of Cisco.

    1. Re:The horror by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then Cisco went and muddied it all up like your sister's proprietary, tattooed boyfriend. Now every time you use GCC, it'll be thinking of Cisco.

      Grunting from the next room disturbing your chain of thought, eh?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  4. Re:The thing about these lawsuits by hmar · · Score: 2, Funny

    "You are an enabler, you enable people to avoid RTFA :D" For which we thank you

  5. Re:"Oh Jeez, not this shit again!" by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's what scrollbars are for. Thank God they're under the GPL license, or I might not be able to scroll past this tired old discussion.

    --
    <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
  6. Re:Maybe this wasn't intentional. by Tetsujin · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's a lot of posts accusing of Cisco of intentionally violating the GPL; even an alleged ex-employee saying that Cisco "didn't care".

    It could be a misunderstanding of the GPL or bad advice from an expert. Why, if I asked a question about the GPL, I would get dozens of posts each having their own and differing "expert" opinion of what is meant.

    ...Generally prefixed with "IANAL"...

    Well, Cisco has to consult some people who do not anal... Those people should have a much less ambiguous view of the GPL.

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  7. Re:The thing about these lawsuits by BlargIAmDead · · Score: 4, Funny

    (3) That the Court order Defendant to account for and disgorge to Plaintiff all profits derived by Defendant from its unlawful acts; [...]

    So am I the only one who thinks disgorge is an awesomely awkward word. All I can see is something like "2 Routers 1 Port!"

  8. Re:"Oh Jeez, not this shit again!" by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Funny

    We reenact this important drama annually, lest we forget.

  9. Get the name right by SnarfQuest · · Score: 5, Funny

    Get the name right. It's Gnu/Cisco.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  10. hitler was evil by emmons · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hitler is evil. Microsoft is evil. Microsoft uses software licenses. That makes software licenses tools of evil.

    Therefore software licenses are tools of Hitler and must be destroyed!

    There.. can we be done with this now?

    --
    Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.