Slashdot Mirror


The Wackiest Technology Tales of 2008

coondoggie writes "Despite the daily drumbeat of new and improved hardware or software, the tech industry isn't all bits and bytes. Some interesting things happen along the way too. Like floating data centers, space geekonauts, shape shifting robots and weird bedfellows (like Microsoft and Jerry Seinfeld). What we include here is an example of what we thought were the best, slightly off-center stories of 2008."

23 of 97 comments (clear)

  1. Wow.. by Anrego · · Score: 3, Informative

    This sounded interesting.. but just really didn't hold my attention. Most of the stuff fell under one of two categories:

    1) stuff which is cool, but that I already knew about ..
    2) stuff which wasn't really all that interesting

    Additionally the little blurb of info the give on each was fairly dry .. .. and they have (at least for my browser) added some annoying anti-"just view the print version" stuff..

    AND GET THE HELL OFF MY LAWN!

    1. Re:Wow.. by syousef · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree, it was a boring slideshow...but what did you expect?

      IT and science aren't known for their amazing comic value (well unless perhaps you consider quantum mechanics - I'd call that stuff wacky). The wackiest things I see in IT are management decisions, particularly when they ask for something without a clue what it will take to build, then set a ridiculous time line. It's even wackier when a senior manager has a revelation and you realize that he's missed something big and lost the plot altogether. What isn't so much fun is explaining why a particular project won't work as intended, or trying to talk someone out of shooting themselves in the foot before losing their attention.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    2. Re:Wow.. by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 5, Funny

      (well unless perhaps you consider quantum mechanics - I'd call that stuff wacky)

      -Hey Electron, what are you doing? You'd better not be eating my Christmas cookies!
       
      -Nope, I'm over here!
       
      -Hey, my cookies are gone! Damn it Heisenberg, isn't there any way to compensate?
       
      -Judging by the size of your microscope, I'd say someone's compensating!
       
      Yep, the Subatomic Sitcom practically writes itself.

    3. Re:Wow.. by db32 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Two atoms are talking and one of them looks sad.
      Atom 1: Whats wrong?
      Atom 2: I lost an electron
      Atom 1: Are you sure?
      Atom 2: I'm positive.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    4. Re:Wow.. by tendrousbeastie · · Score: 3, Funny

      A neutron walk into a bar and orders a drink.

      "How much is that?" he asks the barman.

      The barman replies "For you, there's no charge"

  2. A slide show by techno-vampire · · Score: 5, Informative

    I tried to RTFA and found that the article was nothing but a stupid slide show with a vapid paragraph of comment for each. Unless there's a link to the complete text, there really isn't anything worth looking at.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
    1. Re:A slide show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes that website is awful. Everything on the page is grabbing for attention and it's quite hard to use. One of the worst sites I've seen in ages.

    2. Re:A slide show by bugnuts · · Score: 3, Informative

      Would've been a much better article if it didn't force use of javascript and didn't force you through some 30 pages of crap. 3 pages of crap would've sufficed.

      Interesting how the delivery mechanism is so hated by many techies, but so loved by others. /luddite

  3. How did this get approved for the main page? by VinylRecords · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There isn't anything relevant or newsworthy in the entire piece that was the subject of this post.

    The 'article' is merely a slide-show with some of the most poorly written reporting I have ever encountered. News today is usually infotainment and not information anymore and this is a prime example. Even entries to this piece that should be newsworthy are presented so awfully that I could barely muster the willpower to proceed to the last slide.

    Networkworld.com ... never visiting this website again.

  4. Even those with the attention span of a goldfish by Finallyjoined!!! · · Score: 4, Informative

    Would get bored with the article.

    Even the slides were boring.

    --
    If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
  5. One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Idle

  6. Favorite Error Message of 2008 by j-stroy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I had this (jpg image of my bios) displayed after a hardware failure. "Hard Dick Mode - Enhanced". I ROFL'D heavily, it was even better than the server msg "There has been an error, the error was sucess!"

    FYI m200 tablet with nvidia chip, The graphics had some lines in it, and the factory driver would bsod.

  7. Who cares? by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Might as well talk about Vegetarian Vampires, African-American KKK members, Atheist Christian Pastors, or Dotcom CEOS worth billions who still live in their Mom's basement. It just makes about as much sense as this story.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  8. On slashdot people use the subject line... by PachmanP · · Score: 4, Funny

    to start there sentences.

    --
    You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    1. Re:On slashdot people use the subject line... by MikeUW · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Er...I was hoping to get modded funny. But now I think maybe your post is funnier.

    2. Re:On slashdot people use the subject line... by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Funny

      Their.
       
      Congratulations you're qualified to work in an Indian call center!

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    3. Re:On slashdot people use the subject line... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know, every time I call tech support the guy is saying "there" and not "their", except when he's supposed to say "their", then he says "there".

      And those apostrophes they put in "its" are really annoying too. A misplaced apostrophe sounds like nails going down a chalkboard.

      Anyway, those are my two principle complaints.

  9. Pah! Imposter! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're not a patch on the real New Here. That guy's posted exactly the same comment (and subject) over 200 times in the last 5 years.

    You've done it.... twice. And you couldn't even maintain consistency for those two comments.

    Pah, imposter I say. (I won't even get started on your grammar.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Pah! Imposter! by Zwicky · · Score: 3, Funny

      (I won't even get started on your grammar.

      Lest anyone else gets started on your punctuation... ;)

      It was awfully nice of you to provide the closing parenthesis for him.

      --
      "Three eyes are better than one" -- Lieutenant Columbo
  10. It's 'their', by AndrewNeo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    not 'there'.

  11. Let's make a deal... by Dzimas · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone caught submitting slide shows featuring minimal content smeared over 43 colorful but vapid pages should be punished. I recommend death by stoning, preferably using a truckload of rusty 486s and a pallet or two of 14" monitors instead of boulders. As for the clever soul who deemed the content on the front page, I can only assume he/she/it is blind and suffering the after-effects of a decades-old untreated case of syphilis.

    No. Wait. This must be a sign that slashdot has been secretly acquired by Condé Nast. I anxiously await the premiere issue of Linux Vogue. Sigh.

  12. The Gates/Seinfeld thing. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While discussing the Bill Gates/Jerry Seinfeld ad spots Microsoft ran a few months back, we chanced upon perhaps the real thinking behind it. . .

    Universally hailed as a magnificent failure, we wondered exactly how with Microsoft using all the expertise of the P.R. giant, Waggener Edstrom, and the quarter-billion dollars spent on the project, such a thing could be possible. How could, with those kinds of resources, anybody achieve such a catastrophic P.R. failure?

    Then we realized, "No. It wasn't a failure at all. It was a brilliant success!"

    Here's the logic:

    After the self-destruction of Vista, Microsoft was in free fall. Investors were mightily distressed at Balmer's ineptitude. And so, as happens when huge corporations are desperate, they went to Waggener Edstrom for a rescue plan.

    The P.R. firm sat down and worked out the psychology and set up the following three act show: Act I involved subtle media manipulation presenting Balmer as the idiot he is, the weak link responsible for Vista's failure. This has been accomplished.

    Act II involved running a bunch of ads which were designed to do two things:

    1. Make sure that people knew that Gates was still involved with Microsoft; that he'd gone walkabout, but was still there in the wings.

    2. Show Gates being a hopeless geek. --He was portrayed as an awkward fool who couldn't act and had no screen presence. The whole series left you feeling painfully embarrassed and despite yourself, kind of sorry for him. --Think about that! When EVER has the world felt sorry for Bill Gates? But investors don't want him to be a charismatic actor. They want him to be a hopeless geek/genius who will rescue their share values.

    Now, act III involves the placement of the upcoming Windows 7 in the public conscious, which, surprise, surprise, is getting lots of positive response and sympathy, general good-will and a collective hope that it won't suck. (At least from the general population; Slashdotters are a breed apart.)

    Not a bad bit of P.R. work. Sneaky and manipulative, playing on those hidden aspects of the human mind to achieve its objectives. That's why Microsoft pays Waggener Edstrom 250 million dollars a year. The most powerful advertising happens when you think it isn't working.

    -FL

  13. Re:That's a tad far fetched. by dangitman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Occam's razor leads me to conclude that the Seinfeld/Gates ad campaign was a failure, not a step in some grand plan.

    I don't think Occam's razor has ever applied to Microsoft. Things that look like genius strategic moves turn out to be blind luck, while things that are absolute disasters emerge from what appears to be their most insightful thinking.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.