Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Nudity Policy Draws Nursing Moms' Ire

HSRD writes "Web-savvy moms who breast-feed are irate that social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace restrict photos of nursing babies. The disputes reveal how the sites' community policing techniques sometimes struggle to keep up with the booming number and diversity of their members."

27 of 904 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Damn Puritans by corsec67 · · Score: 4, Funny

    What, pictures of babies eating is harmful to children?

    Eating babies maybe, but why babies eating?

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  2. Have karma to burn by Xelios · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously those infants are being exploited into performing sexual acts in front of a camera. You're damn right those pictures should be removed, think of the children!

    --
    Murphey's fighting Occam, and we're in the stands.
  3. Re:The nudity laws are unfair by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let's keep our heads cool. I strongly suggest that we gather more data before recommending a change to the laws.

  4. Re:Why is this news? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unless your tits are part of a comedy act

    My tits my be considered part of a comedy act, but I would think it more appropriate to invoke the Eighth amendment rather than the First.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  5. Re:whois nudebook.com by couchslug · · Score: 3, Funny

    "If you want to post your breastfeeding pics why not do it where it's welcome?"

    Toss them up on 4chan, where they will be treated with respect and archived for generations yet unborn.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  6. Re:whois nudebook.com by glueball · · Score: 5, Funny

    No bare breasts. What's gray about that?
    Will they ban beach pics of fat uncle Tony who has gynecomastia wearing just his shorts?

  7. Re:The nudity laws are unfair by Lord+Kano · · Score: 4, Funny

    More unfortunate would be the women with really puffy areaolae or the ones with the really big, stretched-out pancake areaolae.

    Funny that you mention this. One time, my girlfriend and her best friend were tickling each other (yes, I know how hot that is) and her friend's shirt and bra came down just a little bit. Her areolae were like saucers. They were absolutely enormous. I made a joke about it, and she didn't talk to me for a month.

    Big silver-dollar areolae require no explanation as they would be impossible to hide unless the baby is hydrocephalic.

    When she started to act embarrassed I say "It's ok. I swear I didn't see anything. Not even your big silver-dollar pancake sized areola."

    When she got angry, I tried to mitigate with little effect. I said "I didn't say that they were nice, they're just big".

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  8. Someone stop them! by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do you realize that for every one of us there are two, count them, TWO nipples? And almost half of us have some serious fatty tissue behind those nipples! I mean we can't have children seeing the things can we? Keep their shirst on! I mean the single best thing for a newborn to suckle on should be shameful and weird. Babies eat from bottles right? And watching a baby nurse ... well I know all kinds of people that it turns on ... OK not even one. Its a bewb - BAN it!

    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  9. Re:Damn Puritans by NickDngr · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think its ridiculous--but its how our society evolved.

    No, that's how our society was intelligently designed. Get it right.

    --
    Yoda of Borg am I! Assimilated shall you be! Futile resistance is, hmm?
  10. Re:Shut up, crybabies. by Isotopian · · Score: 4, Funny

    What the hell is a mammel?

    /irony

    --

    It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

  11. Re:whois nudebook.com by stypica · · Score: 5, Funny

    dear god, I hope so!

  12. Re:Shut up, crybabies. by kv9 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bet it tasted good when you had a couple of dozen braincells firing away going NOMNOMNOM.

    still does, man...

  13. Re:Damn Puritans by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 2, Funny

    Intelligence plays no part in it.

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
  14. Re:Damn Puritans by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's because it's _cold_. I'm looking at the weathermap of Ontario right now, and parts of Ontario are -20 degrees, Fahrenheit.

  15. Re:whois nudebook.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    There's a difference between a statue and a picture of real tits.

    Not according to the government.

  16. Re:whois nudebook.com by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1, Funny

    Will they ban beach pics of fat uncle Tony who has gynecomastia wearing just his shorts?

    I hope so.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  17. Re:whois nudebook.com by nightfire-unique · · Score: 5, Funny

    How about the obvious? Sometimes, babies need to eat wherever they are, regardless of social setting. No one NEEDS to have sex at any particular time. And, I'll add that if you think watching a couple have sex is as equally disconcerting as a mother breastfeeding, you may want to move to the nearest monastery. Nothing there should ever disconcert you.

    Monastery? While that might solve his problem, that is only treating the symptoms.

    If you find the sight of a mother breastfeeding highly disconcerting, you should probably see a psychologist. Your subconscious is clearly grappling with something unpleasant...

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  18. Re:whois nudebook.com by qbast · · Score: 2, Funny

    No. And neither did you.

  19. Re:Last year's news by MikeUW · · Score: 3, Funny

    Fortunately, nobody has to move just yet. Your comment just raised the quality of /. up just enough to keep us going a little longer.

  20. Re:Shut up, crybabies. by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Funny

    internet rule number 5: when you have no valid argument, attack spelling and grammar.

    You forgot to capitalize the first word of that sentence ;)

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. Re:whois nudebook.com by budgenator · · Score: 3, Funny

    Somehow I find the idea of unmarried Monks, Priests and Alter-boys more disconcerting than breastfeeding in public.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  23. Re:You jest... by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Look, breast feeding a 2 month old because it is hungry is just caring for your child. Having a 3 or 4 year old who has been eating solid foods for years suck on your nipples because it feels good is a sexual act. Getting your nipples sucked because it feels good is pretty universally considered a sexual act. If you don't consider it a sexual act, then I would love to get to know your wife. Will it also not be a sexual act if she returns the favor by sucking on parts of me? Whoo Hoo! Party at CrackedButters' house!

  24. Re:whois nudebook.com by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Funny

    This was a remarkably stupid statement even by slashdot standards. Last I checked, human males were "seriously perverted".

    Yes, well ... it's a relative condition. In fact, sometimes it involves relatives.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  25. Re:whois nudebook.com by MiniMike · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know what shady part of town you hang out in, but I have NEVER had a con artist try to breastfeed me in order to win my trust.

    Not that it might not work....

  26. Re:Stupid double standard by Al+Al+Cool+J · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, you've demonstrated that a clitoris is hard to find, and that dicks are everywhere. Not exactly an earthshattering revelation, is it?

  27. Great Idea !!! You've got a business plan. by DrYak · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey ! I think your onto something there :

    I think that just goes to show how stupid and dangerous it is to allow a central authority to gain such control, especially when there are other alternatives. {...} No, the real (but difficult) solution is to convince Facebook's users to start building a truly distributed social network, so that there is no one entity which gets to decide what's acceptable and what isn't

    I smell a great business plan !~

    We could, you know, imagine a distributed content system. With each content linked to each other.
    Doesn't need to be complicated.
    Sort of just text documents with pictures in them. But in addition of that with links between them : like some *advanced text*. All connected in all direction like some higher dimensional figure. But I can't find a name for it yet~

    But that sure is going to be a lot of complicated data. Maybe we should hire some guys to help us develop this linked-text format. I've heard that the people at the LHC have to deal with lots of data to publish on a regular basis. Maybe they could help us design with format~

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]