Slashdot Mirror


A Peek At DHS's Files On You

kenblakely writes "We've known for a while that the Department of Homeland Security was collecting travel records on those who cross US borders, but now you can see it for yourself. A Freedom of Information Act request got this blogger a look at DHS's file on his travels. Pretty comprehensive — all the way down to the IP address of the host he used to make a reservation."

63 of 241 comments (clear)

  1. Time to recycle a "meme". by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All your data are belong to us!

    1. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 4, Interesting

      DHS are the gestapo. They have been explicitly referred to as the Gestapo by two lawmakers, Luis V. Gutierrez(D-ill) and Sam Farr(D-CA).

      They have been placed in charge of thoughtcrime and IP enforcement among others.

      Are these the guys you want banging at your door at random for the inevitable(give it a few more years) state-sponsored "health and wellness" checks?

    2. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by CannonballHead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A politician said it so it must be true.

    3. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by Chabo · · Score: 4, Funny
      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    4. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Funny

      Only when corroborated by a /. post.

    5. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Read the article. That anyone can say, in the United States, with a straight face, that "words matter" when someone calls law enforcement "the Gestapo" is problem enough.

      The basis for a defense against any such accusations should be to point to their actions. But no, the defense here was to say "words matter" and to try to silence the people making the claims. That's the action of a totalitarian mindset, which, coming from an official of ICE, adds credence to the claims of the politicians.

    6. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't you fucking remember 9/11, when terrorists flew pirated mp3s and child pornography into the twin towers?

      Never forget.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    7. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by genner · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't you fucking remember 9/11, when terrorists flew pirated mp3s and child pornography into the twin towers?

      Never forget.

      They might have. Since we didn't check their laptops we will never know.

    8. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by andy_t_roo · · Score: 4, Funny

      all evidence has some *finite* weight, besides 10,000 lemmings can't be wrong ....

    9. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please. If they were the Gestapo they'd have cool uniforms. If they were thought police they'd make you do situps like in 1984.

      I'm no fan of DHS, but have some perspective. As repressive police state functionaries go, DHS doesn't even rate. I'd put them somewhere between a pre-Miranda rural US Sheriff's Office and the Canadian Mounties.

    10. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I still cannot believe this gets modded insightful. Let's start with the basics:

      First, you compare something with Nazism that doesn't even being to start to even pale in comparison. This either means you are truly incapable of understanding the difference (unlikely) or you are being dishonest but are trying to score rhetorical points (more likely). That goes for you and the Representatives that said the same thing.

      If you want to try to define the various things that Operation Predator as "thoughtcrime", go right ahead but the vast majority of Americans think that individuals that take concrete steps to, say, have intercourse with a young child ought to be punished. IAAL and, in all instances that I'm aware of, no individual was convicted without having taken concrete steps towards committing a very serious crime. Please enlighten me if I am mistaken.

      Finally, I have no idea where you got the idea that compulsory home-visits for anything are "inevitable" but I can tell you this: barring a dramatic shift in the way the fourth amendment is interpreted, that isn't going to happen. As it is now, you need not answer anyone at your door sans a warrant.

    11. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by LinkX39 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Furthermore an ILLINOIS politician said it so it must be true. Here in Illinois we have such honest, civic-minded politicians after all.

    12. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by DirePickle · · Score: 3, Funny

      So that's what melted the girders!

    13. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by lawpoop · · Score: 3, Informative

      There was a case from Ohio, I believe, where a prison inmate had kept a diary. This person, IIRC, was a sex offender. In this diary, he wrote down a fantasy he had involving minors. The diary wasn't private, but part of his therapy, and of course the authorities read it. He was charged with creating and possessing child pornography, IIRC. It went either to the Ohio Supreme Court, I believe --

      Actually, I got a lot of the details wrong. It was a private diary, and it went to the common pleas court. But he did get charged 11 years for posession.
      Story.

      So it was a win for privacy and rationality. But, you can see where the law enforcement folks want this to go. Maybe you'll be arrested for owning a copy of the movie "The Aristocrats".

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    14. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Finally, I have no idea where you got the idea that compulsory home-visits for anything are "inevitable" but I can tell you this: barring a dramatic shift in the way the fourth amendment is interpreted, that isn't going to happen. As it is now, you need not answer anyone at your door sans a warrant.

      As I found out when a teacher reported my family for child neglect, (she had mixed up my daughter and the girl she often played with), you do have the right to refuse a child protection officer entry without a warrant. They, in return, have the right to have the police enter and seize your children, without a warrant, until the CPS officer has determined that the situation is safe. Refusing entry is considered an admission that an unsafe situation exists. Oh, and when I denied that there was a problem, I was told that if I didn't cooperate, it could take over six months before it would be deemed safe for my children to be returned. And of course, there are the random "followup" visits, to ensure you're still a good parent. Once you have an open file with CPS, they can check up on you at any time, for no reason beyond someone wants to. Even if you were found innocent of the original accusations.

      So technically, you are correct, I can refuse to answer the door. I just need to give up my children to do it.

      I've been kind of amused over recent years, to see the amount of howling and whining that's happened when other people get subjected to the lack of rights that parents have been living with for decades.

    15. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by EbeneezerSquid · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Before giving the government a new job, don't just think twice, think three, four, twenty times. If you still think it's a good idea, you still probably shouldn't.

      Every job, like airport security, that can be done by a private company, will be done better by a private company than the government will.

      If you give a government bureaucrat power, it will be abused and expanded.

      The Best that can be hoped for is for government to do a very few jobs, poorly.

    16. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by ryanov · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you stupid? Yeah, why have a government that WE elect do something when we can have profiteers do it instead.

    17. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by OzoneLad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, it's much better to have elected profiteers take care of it.

    18. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by Disfnord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Conservatives are only about small government when the Democrats are in power.

    19. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by Leafheart · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, sorry, I don't feel bad. Parents are constantly bleating how "we" need to "protect the children." Well, guess what? Statistically speaking, parents ARE the biggest threat to their children. So, sorry I don't feel bad when parents are put over the coals.

      Even when they are innocent? Hmmm interesting concept there.

      --
      --- "When you gotta do something wrong. You gotta do it right. (Fighter)"
    20. Re:Time to recycle a "meme". by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe they had Sony batteries in their laptops.

  2. I wish by bugs2squash · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wish they would also track credit card spending in the same file.

    Perhaps I could then just forward the DHS records for my travel expense reports.

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:I wish by QuasiEvil · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps I could then just forward the DHS records for my travel expense reports.

      That would rock and save me so much time.

      DHS, are you listening? Oh wait, of course you are. If you could just forward this post to the "suggestions" bucket, I'd appreciate it.

  3. Who can request that? by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's a shame he didn't explain how much identification was required to request this information and how well that identification was checked. I imagine ex-spouses and employers would love a list of where you've traveled and who paid for the ticket.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Who can request that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      From what I gathered from TFA, all that's required is enough information to identify one single person, and for you to not be a private corporation or group. I.e., anyone who found your passport laying forgotten at an airport could find out where you had been in the last 15 years, and who knows how much more (and scarier) info.
       
      CAPTCHA: answers

    2. Re:Who can request that? by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a shame that we don't live in a world that contains a worldwide network of information where answers to many questions can easily be found.

      Even if such a network existed I'd wager that people would just use it to find porn.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:Who can request that? by againjj · · Score: 4, Informative

      Access to records are ruled by the Freedom of Information Act. For non-personal information requests, you need give your name, address, daytime telephone number, information on the records you are looking for, and an agreement on amount of fees you are willing to pay. For personal information, you also need a bunch of info on the person (subject), a notarized signature or Under Penalty of Perjury Statement (see third link), and a statement authorizing you to receive the subject's personal information (assuming you are not the subject).

      Sources:
      http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/privacy/privacy_pia_cbp_ats.pdf (section 7.1)
      http://www.state.gov/m/a/ips/
      http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/103067.pdf

  4. Nice... by gillbates · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Officials use the information to prevent terrorism, acts of organized crime, and other illegal activity.

    Does the DHS have even one documented case of this information preventing said activity? Maybe I'm setting myself up in the wrong way here, but AFAIK, the DHS and TSA combined have never thwarted a terrorist attack or busted the mafia. Perhaps they've used to convict people of violating those administrative rules which no one is allowed to see, but I'm not aware of any evidence which suggests this information actually prevented terrorism or organized crime.

    I mean sure, the FBI has busted criminals, but with regular gumshoe detective work.

    With journalists like these, who needs a terrorist?

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:Nice... by volkris · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Speculation.

      Unfortunately we have no way of knowing. For all we know this information might have actually stopped another major attack or two, saving thousands of lives. Certainly some in the government would like us to believe that.

      But the fact is we don't know and FIOA requests are unlikely to get us the answer.

      Better oversight is definitely needed, but in the mean time we shouldn't assume this stuff has not prevented terrorism. Mainly we should just assume we don't know.

    2. Re:Nice... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Does the DHS have even one documented case of this information preventing said activity?

      I doubt it. I drive through one of these about once a month and I always chuckle at the sign which reads "Terrorist threat level -- yellow".

      I've ranted about them before so I'll just quickly say that they're there to catch low-hanging fruit like personal drug use and DUI to scare other citizens and fatten the county's coffers through citation. But I have a recent, true story to add:

      A VERY law-abiding acquaintance(we'll call him "Jack") who is a retired State government worker was stopped at one of the checkpoints. They ran a dog around the car and the dog went apeshit. The CBP officers asked if they could search the car, even going so far as to say, "look, if you have something small like a joint, maybe we can make a deal". Of course, there were no drugs in "Jack"'s car so Jack told them to fuck off and get another dog. They did, and whaddya know, the other dog didn't smell shit and so they sent "Jack" on his merry way.

      [tinfoil hat]They probably train a dog to scratch at every fifth car to instill fear among the others who have to watch and to see if they can generate an excuse to tear the car apart looking for bad stuff.[/tinfoil hat] And why not? It worked for FISA and all the retroactive "probable cause" bullshit associated with its gutting of our privacy.

    3. Re:Nice... by DragonWriter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Effective security should stop attacks in the planning stages when the terrorists realize their plan cannot work, not at the last possible moment.

      And how are secret measures that it takes a herculean effort even to reveal exist going to do that, especially when combined with the much more well publicized failures of DHS components (e.g., TSA) to do basic thinks like spot images of bombs on baggage screening scanners?

      Heck, even if these measures were publicized, its hard to see how they would help: terrorists, particularly suicide terrorists, aren't going to be particularly concerned that after they blow up the plane they are on, DHS might figure out who they were and where they bought their ticket.

    4. Re:Nice... by schon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unfortunately we have no way of knowing.

      Of course we do. You said it in your next sentence:

      this information might have actually stopped another major attack or two, saving thousands of lives. Certainly some in the government would like us to believe that.

      DINGDINGDINGDINGDING!

      If any of this was used in any way to detect or prevent a terr'ist attack, Dick Fucking Cheney himself would be all over the news talking about how the evil terr'ists had been thwarted by the Republicans, and how they need to be given more powers to "protect" you.

      The fact that *nobody* has said that this has been useful in stopping what they claim it stops means that it isn't.

    5. Re:Nice... by volkris · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, now you're just factually wrong: officials HAVE come out and said that such information has thwarted attacks.

      As I said, oversight is needed to determine whether those claims have merit.

      Anyway, by your reply you seem far too into the "evil Bush" mindset to discuss this in any intellectually honest way, so I'm not going to bother.

      Have a nice day.

  5. Re:I noticed a dhs.org redirect once by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More likely your browser was pre-fetching search results and one of your search results was on a dhs.gov web page.

  6. Re:I'm going to request mine by Anthony_Cargile · · Score: 3, Interesting

    well you might also find your FBI record interesting as well.

  7. Sent off for mine this morning.... by (H)elix1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was curious to see what was in my file, as I've had a devil of a time trying to come up with my travel via stamps in the passport. The airlines were not helpful past 2005. I sent in for mine, based on the notes in that article, like this...

    U.S. Customs Service
    1300 Pennsylvania Avenue
      NW., Washington, DC 20229
    January 6, 2009

    To: Freedom of Information Act Request
    From: [helix]
    Subject: INFORMATION RELATING TO ME IN THE AUTMATED TARGETING SYSTEM

    I am requesting information relating to me in the Automated Targeting System. My request is made pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552). I wish to have a copy of your records made and mailed to me without first inspecting them.

    [helix]

    Born [redacted] in [redacted].

    Passport number: [redacted], issued [redacted], expired [redacted]
    Passport number: [redacted], issued [redacted], expiring [redacted]

    Please mail the information to my home address:

    [redacted]

    Sincerely,

    [redacted]

    and addressed to

    Freedom of Information Act Request
    U.S. Customs Service
    1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.
    Washington DC 20229

    1. Re:Sent off for mine this morning.... by The_Wilschon · · Score: 3, Informative

      You might find the e2 node about getting your FBI records useful, as was posted above.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
  8. Fun with FOIA... by Chabo · · Score: 3, Funny

    I remember an episode of Law and Order: SVU from last year where Richard Belzer's character requests his own file under FOIA. He's telling them where they can park the trucks to deliver it, but he's sorely disappointed when he gets his file and it only contains a single sheet of paper. The writers of the show must be Douglas Adams fans, cause the paper said something fairly equivalent to "Mostly harmless." Belzer's character complained about this, along the lines of "But I was a violent revolutionary!"

    --
    Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
  9. Is this busy work or an effective measure? by john.picard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I believe I read somewhere that there are, at any given moment, 60,000 people in the air over the United States alone. That's a tremendous amount of information and more accumulates every day, so much that I cannot imagine how anybody or any software could sift through all of it effectively.

    1. Re:Is this busy work or an effective measure? by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Informative

      And two of these are always US Air Marshals.

      I'm being facetious, but not that much: http://www.cnn.com/2008/TRAVEL/03/25/siu.air.marshals/index.html.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

  10. Re:"passenger activity" and IP addys by chris_mahan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Let's say the traveler cancels at the last minute, and the plane blows up. They go check it out, because maybe he/she was tipped off by a friend not to get on the plane.

    I knew a guy who was supposed to be on flight 800 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TWA_Flight_800) but that morning he fell down carrying his metal trash down the stairs and injured himself. He went to the hospital and was OK but he had missed the flight. The next day the FBI came over and wanted to know why he had not been on the plane. He had to convince them that he had gone to the hospital. They went and checked out his story.

    --

    "Piter, too, is dead."

  11. What a great way... by Killer+Orca · · Score: 2, Funny

    To get them to start a record on you. Begin record: "Subject requests non-existent record of self, begin monitoring immediately after non-record is given."

  12. Should have used the Privacy Act, not FOIA by karl.auerbach · · Score: 5, Informative

    The person made his request under FOIA. That was not the best vehicle for this.

    A much better law to use to get information about yourself is the Privacy Act.

    The two laws have confusingly similar numbers: 5 USC 552 for FOIA and 5 USC 552a for the Privacy Act.

    The Privacy Act is a much bigger hammer for getting information about yourself. Agencies have many fewer excuses and the deadlines are far shorter. And agencies generally can't make you pay for you to get their information about you.

    Yes, the Privacy Act has many loopholes, but they are much fewer than those in FOIA.

    So, if people are going to do this they should make sure that they make their request under the Privacy Act. They can still use FOIA, but they should do so under a separate cover because the agencies will intentionally conflate the two laws so that they can avoid fully complying with either.

    See: http://www.cavebear.com/archive/nsf-dns/laws.htm

  13. Re:Measure of Effectiveness by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Granted, I don't find the TSA extremely effective per-se, as they let a caught a relative with a pair of 4" scissors who accidentally left them in her sewing bag, but then let her on the plane with them anyway

    The TSA does more than check passengers for box cutters. This incident (besides being anecdotal) says nothing about the TSA, other than that one TSA agent is not a droid and used some common sense. As many have pointed out, the era of small melee weapons being effective hijacking tools is over. Seriously, what do you think would happen if someone pulled out a pair of scissors and said "this is a hijacking"? Remember Richard Reid, the "Shoe Bomber?" They had that fucker hogtied and sedated within minutes of smelling a burning match. The 9-11 attacks were only successful because the "aircraft suicide bomb" gambit had never been done before and people were conditioned to go along with hijackers and wait it out.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  14. Re:Some reductions there by sentientbeing · · Score: 3, Funny

    Meh. Vegetarians are murderers and those populist vegans are a sell out. I'm a seventh-level vegan.

    I don't eat anything that casts a shadow.

    --

    ------
    beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
  15. Stupid, expensive, and ineffective. by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The billions of dollars spent on the security theater we put up with at airports would buy a hell of a lot of good old-fashioned counterintelligence work, infiltrating organizations that mean to do us harm. The idea that a perp won't go through with an attack if you just suck down a couple more terabytes of data and feel up every woman in the security line is nothing but fantasy.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  16. Re:I noticed a dhs.org redirect once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    dhs.org is a dns redirector. I have an account with them.

    LOL i actually got asked once if i worked for DHS when i provided someone with an email address using that redirector. I've had the account with them long before the DHS office ever existed.

  17. Gestapo? by mi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    DHS are the gestapo.

    If there is one reason I can't wait 'till January 21st, it is the reinstatement of the Godwin's Law:

    Godwin's Law /prov./ [Usenet] "As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one." There is a tradition in many groups that, once this occurs, that thread is over, and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever argument was in progress.

    With Bush in power the law got suspended and it got most fashionable to compare American Government with 3rd Reich — instead of losing the argument instantly, one gets a +5 moderation...

    Not after the upcoming inauguration, one Hopes.

    Does anyone have records of Gestapo mailing a German a copy of their file on them? Oh, never mind...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Gestapo? by FiloEleven · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm all for reinstating Godwin's Law, but when our country is like Nazi Germany in all but name and lack of schnitzel, there are more important things to worry about!

    2. Re:Gestapo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, like, "Where's my damn schnitzel!?"

    3. Re:Gestapo? by corbettw · · Score: 3, Funny

      Which sucks, because if you're going to have an intrusive government with no regard for civil liberties, you might as well have decent pork sausages.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    4. Re:Gestapo? by daveime · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's been outsourced to Israel

    5. Re:Gestapo? by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, there was a time Nazi Germany didn't have death camps either, and the GGP didn't specify exactly what year. Perhaps he meant 1939 Germany.

    6. Re:Gestapo? by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 3, Funny

      I maintain, that without the death camps, a very important piece is missing

      *sigh*.. fine, I'll set up a death camp. Will that make you happy?

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
  18. No longer do I need to keep my own records by mi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is a saying, that a married man need not remember his mistakes — his wife will always remind him.

    Similarly, there is, it seems, hardly a need to maintain one's own travel records (such as for tax purposes) as the Government will always be ready to mail a neat envelope with 20 copies...

    The only offensive part here is that although — according to TFA: "Since 2002, the government has mandated that the commercial airlines deliver this information routinely and electronically " (emphasis mine), the records aren't delivered to the citizens neither routinely (only upon request), nor electronically (20 copies by mail?). Oh, and the request, apparently, needs to be filed on bad old paper.

    Time for FOIA-2.0...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  19. Re:"passenger activity" and IP addys by cdrguru · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since the airlines stopped paying them, I don't think there are any more travel agents. At least I haven't heard of anyone using one in the last 6 years or so. I guess they might still exist, but you have to pay them for anything except cruise ships - I think they still get a commission on those.

    Airfare? Last time was at least 2002, maybe before that.

  20. Then that's not a well-trained dog by Chmcginn · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dunno. Does Jack have a dog? Maybe the checkpoint dog smelled something innocent like dog piss.

    The entire point of bomb & drug dog training is to make them ignore the things that interest normal dogs (dogs of the opposite sex, food, dogs of the same sex, and people, generally in that order) and pay attention to the things that their trainers are interested in (high-nitrate compounds, processed coca leaves, or even DVDs).

    If a detection dog is getting distracted by other scents while on duty, it calls into question whether or not they should be used as a cause for further investigation.

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  21. Elephants! by kbahey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This one is easy ...

    Ever since the DHS has been setup, there are no terror attacks on the USA. So, obviously what the DHS is doing prevents terrorism.

    Is is the same up here in Canada. We sprinkle black pepper on our lawns to prevent elephants from messing then up.

    But there are no elephants in Canada you say? See, more proof that the black pepper works ...

    1. Re:Elephants! by BloodyIron · · Score: 2, Funny

      Black pepper is just a hoax generated by the government. Clearly my evidence holds precedent. That being that by doing nothing, no elephants have trampled my lawn.

  22. This is a standard CO PNR by hemp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Before everyone gets all tinfoily, this is merely a PNR (Passenger Name Record) from Continental Airlines reservation system (System One) made through their online website. Most employees at Continental would have access to this.

    Its relatively easy to decode:

    1 CO 40H 20JUN FR EWRFCO HK1 525P 745A 27B

    1 -1st leg
    40H -Flight number + ?
    CO -Continental Airlines
    20Jun -Departs June 20
    EWRFCO -Flight is Newark to Rome
    525P -Departs 5:25 pm
    745A -Arrives 7:45 am
    27B -Seat number

    2 ARNK -ARrival uNKnown, means legs are not continuous

    3 CO 103V 06JUL SU AMSEWR HK1 920A 1150A 27b

    AMSEWR -Return flight is Amsterdam to Newark

    IP Address stuck in case of credit card fraud.

    Most airlines have something very similar that is created every time you make a reservation.

    --
    Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
  23. Re:"passenger activity" and IP addys by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Suppose you go make a reservation on an airplane, from an IP address that is currently mapped to tor.

    If you were in the FBI, would that be a flag for you to dig deeper?

    What if you made a reservation on an airplane, from an IP address that is currently coming from a proxy.

    You get the idea.

    Is there a way to get the mac address of the pc if it connects to a commercial wifi service (like Hotspot, for example?) Would Dell, HP, ASUS or any other identify the purchaser of a specific mac address owner?

    There are many ways to find out who is who if you are the government and you tap the internet tubes, and you have secret rooms in the communication companie's headquarters, and you know what you are doing, and the NSA is helping you out.

    I know I would be digging for that sort of stuff if it was my job.

    --

    "Piter, too, is dead."

  24. Re:Schnitzel by Strawser · · Score: 2, Informative

    Schnitzel is an Austrian dish, not German.
    Just an FYI.

    So was Hitler, so I think it's kind of appropriate.

    --
    The louder he talked of his honour, the faster we counted our spoons. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
  25. Re:I'm going to request mine by El+Yanqui · · Score: 2, Funny

    I figure one of these days I'll just get the data from a disc left on a train seat next to me. Won't have to pay anything for it.

    --
    Well, thanks to the Internet, I'm now bored with sex.