Slashdot Mirror


South Carolina Seeking To Outlaw Profanity

MBGMorden writes "It looks like in an act that defies common sense, a bill has been introduced in the South Carolina State Senate that seeks to outlaw the use of profanity. According to the bill it would become a felony (punishable by a fine up to $5000 or up to 5 years in prison) to 'publish orally or in writing, exhibit, or otherwise make available material containing words, language, or actions of a profane, vulgar, lewd, lascivious, or indecent nature.' I'm not sure if 'in writing' could be applied to the internet, but in any event this is scary stuff."

31 of 849 comments (clear)

  1. Ouch by fyngyrz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Don't think it can't happen. The hysteria-over-liberty mode of thinking that pervades every level of our legal and court system has resulted in significant erosion of all manner of what would, to a sensible person, seem to be rock-solid and unmovable declarations of constitutional rights.

    We have seen the right to remain silent turn into the right to be tortured until you say what they want to hear; we have seen the 4th amendment turned into an irrelevancy by nattering idiocy about your papers being in digital form; we have seen the commerce clause turned on its very head; we have seen the establishment of "free speech zones" and other 1984-ish/esque crushing of liberties; censorship is the accepted norm for "solving" disagreements about what we see, say and hear insofar as it might offend some poor, weak-willed moron; screams of "save the children", "terrorists" and "global warming" drive legislators to write, and pass, the most odious, anti-liberty and outright anti-American legislation on a daily basis.

    There's no limit to this, either; we have seen the specific directive not to pass ex post facto laws ignored at the congressional level and then whistle right through the supreme court; we have seen the explicit directive of the 2nd amendment's operative clause turned into the most moronic and sophist idiocy about "what is a militia?", a non-issue mined blindly and moronically out of the prefatory clause.

    Don't think it can't get worse. Ask yourself instead, why should you expect it to get any better?

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Ouch by reeeh2000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      fuck, now i have to go to the fucking state house and tell Sanford and all the other asshole to gtfo. Who's with me! Imagine, a bunch of Slashdotters holding up signs that say Get the Fuck out. I hate living in this state with these fucking retards. Fuck!

    2. Re:Ouch by networkBoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      add to that:
      fucking first amendment baby!

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    3. Re:Ouch by Kymermosst · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Separation of church and state, don't forget that "under god" was added to the anthem and constitution in the 1950's unlawfully. This shit is getting out of fucking hand. Those mother fuckers.

      Which amendment to the constitution added "under god"?

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    4. Re:Ouch by Anthony_Cargile · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I live in South Carolina, and honestly this is one of the stupidest things I've seen my state do (did I mention we tried to secede from the union, still have a town named secessionville, AND re-enact a war we lost?)

      Since this will soon be illegal, please allow me to say it: FUCK THIS STATE

    5. Re:Ouch by Enderandrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Write a letter to State Senator Ford and tell him to fuck off.

      I'm not remotely kidding.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    6. Re:Ouch by Enderandrew · · Score: 5, Interesting

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Decency_Act

      They already tried it.

      And while people defended voting for something clearly non-Constitutional by saying Congress doesn't determine what is Constitutional, I think the spirit of the 14th Amendment suggests the government should not pass bills that remove our basic rights.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

      I will write him a letter and tell him to fuck off. Watch him attempt to prosecute me. I'll fight that all day long and expose him for the idiot that he is.

      When you are an elected official in this country, perhaps you should be familiar with the Constitution. There is a growing trend of elected officials who apparently have never heard of the thing.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    7. Re:Ouch by DarkSarin · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, those are the US Senators FROM SC. Ford is a senator in the SC State Senate. Very different beast. At least pay some attention to the facts on the ground.

      All that said...while I don't typically swear much, this guy's a moron and needs to be removed from office painfully.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    8. Re:Ouch by CaptCovert · · Score: 5, Informative

      The 'No Swearing' law got overturned by the State Supreme Court of Michigan back in 2002. http://articles.latimes.com/2002/apr/02/news/mn-35828

    9. Re:Ouch by El+Yanqui · · Score: 5, Insightful

      all you folks need to remeber that profanity is NOT covered in the first amendment, it protects political free speech, not calling each other names or the like.

      It's scary how misguided you are. Here's the First Amendment.

      Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

      Kindly point out where it states that only political speech is covered. Profanity is most definitely covered by the First Amendment. You are thinking of obscenity which is a different animal and one that has had a shifting definition. Saying you're a fucking nitwit is entirely within my rights.

      --
      Well, thanks to the Internet, I'm now bored with sex.
  2. Cancel my trip to Charleston by Bemopolis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fuck that shit.

    --
    "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    1. Re:Cancel my trip to Charleston by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You are fined two credits for violations of the Verbal Morality Statute.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:Cancel my trip to Charleston by Ecuador · · Score: 5, Funny

      Depends on your translation/edition. So, it could be:

      Shut the purgatory up, you condemned donkey harlot!

      Still a strong statement of course...

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    3. Re:Cancel my trip to Charleston by Phroggy · · Score: 5, Informative

      The word Purgatory doesn't exist in the Bible at all. Sheol (Hebrew) and Hades (Greek) do, though.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    4. Re:Cancel my trip to Charleston by mabhatter654 · · Score: 5, Funny

      God wrote the Bible in King James, it's the only "real" Bible. The Jews just got an early copy.

  3. Wha... by slugtastic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What about Freedom of speech?

  4. Definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well? What is it? You need to define profanity before you can outlaw it.

    Frankly I find skinny good looking women who wear too much clothing to be vulgar. I find the number three pronounced as free offensive. I think puppies are indecent

    However, I find skinny good looking women who wear next to no clothing - acceptable.

  5. Bertrand Russell & Robert A. Heinlein weigh in by terrahertz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Obscenity is whatever happens to shock some elderly and ignorant magistrate." - Bertrand Russell

    "Of all the strange "crimes" that human beings have legislated of nothing, "blasphemy" is the most amazing - with "obscenity" and "indecent exposure" fighting it out for the second and third place." - Robert A. Heinlein

    --
    Slashdot? Oh, I just read it for the articles.
  6. Re:Pah! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...did you elect a pack of retards

    The quality of politicians often mirrors the majority of the voting population.

  7. This was tried in Michigan and failed by techess · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Michigan had an anti-profanity passed in 1897. It outlawed cursing in front of woment or children. In 1989 a canoeist was charged with violating the law after hitting a rock with his canoe and releasing a stream of profanities in front of a family.

    He was actually found guilty the first time around. The court of appeals though threw out his case and the law. Here though if he had been convicted it would only have been a $75 fine and community service.

    http://www.freedomforum.org/templates/document.asp?documentID=15992

    --
    Don't anthropomorphize computers. They *hate* that.
  8. Unenforceable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unless S.C. wants to outlaw all language altogether, they're looking at something that's not even enforceable. So they ban your standard fucks, shits, and cunts. Awesome. Are they thinking new euphemisms and curses aren't going to spring up to fill the void? Failing creation of new words, are they going to prosecute the intent behind words used? If I can't express my displeasure about my boss in South Carolina using traditional profanity, will they go after me if I call him a doody-head?

    Funny thing about language. It's creative and evolves. Even profanity is changing and twisting meaning - in some (usually male) teenagers today, 'fuck' is used like 'like' or 'um' might be used by certain other groups of people. There may not necessarily be any obscene intent behind the word, and may just be used as filler.

  9. Re:Saelorn by Thiez · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reminds me of this: http://www.bash.org/?178890

  10. Re:What the fuck is wrong with South Carolina? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think there is something anybody could say or write that is obscene as flying the Confederate battle flag of the army of North Virginia from the state house of state with a large black population.

  11. You know what they say by DesScorp · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you outlaw profanity, only outlaws will have profanity.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  12. oy by Ethanol · · Score: 5, Funny

    As my five-year-old son used to say when he was experimenting with profanity but hadn't gotten the hang of it yet, "Oh, for heaven's fuck."

  13. A miracle of stupidity. by dweller_below · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought that my legislators were 'World Class' crazy (Utah).

    It looks like we aren't even playing in the big leagues.

    This level of crazy is a delicate balancing act. You have to be dumb enough to think that this is a good idea, but somehow manage to keep from drowning in the shower.

    Is there any way to tell if the responsible parties have indoor plumbing? How do they avoid rain?

    Miles

  14. CALM DOWN by sourcehunter · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ok folks - I live in SC - So I can say with some certanty - CALM DOWN.

    1) This is just a BILL introduced in the Senate. I don't see anything on the House calendar indicating that it was also filed there, and if there was a SERIOUS push to make this happen, you'd see a similar bill in the house.

    2) He submitted this SAME BILL the last THREE sessions. Thats the last 6 years. See session 117, 116 and 115. Quite frankly I didn't go back any further but he may have introduced this same bill before that, too. EVERY TIME this bill has been introduced, it has died in committee.

    3) This guy has a terrible clearance rate. ZERO general bills on which he's the primary sponsor have passed in the last few sessions .

    4) I bet if you look, you'll find this same type of legislation popping up in other state houses or county councils... and dying just as quickly. Someone's always going to try - doesn't mean they'll get anywhere and DOES NOT mean to freak out.

    --

    quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Juvenal
    1. Re:CALM DOWN by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 5, Interesting

      OK. So who keeps electing this genius?

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  15. there are no words that everyone can agree are bad by trolltalk.com · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think you're wrong.

    I think everyone can agree that this word is definitely bad.

  16. Vagueness doesn't stop bills from passing by billstewart · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No, there's no law that says you can't pass bad laws. Courts can strike down laws that violate the Constitution, or laws (or more usually, parts of laws) that are too vague to be enforceable, but that's after the law gets passed, and usually not until somebody tries to enforce it.

    But this law isn't "void for vagueness" - courts, including the US Supreme Court, have allowed obscenity laws that have "community standards" rather than explicit definitions, and Justice Potter Stewart famously said about obscenity "I know it when I see it". This law's sufficiently clear and way over-the-top about what it's trying to prohibit, it's just blatantly unconstitutional.

    The real question is why the politician is trying to propose such a law when he should know better. Is he really ignorant enough not to know better (unlikely, but quite possible)? Is he trying to excite his base so they'll give him more money next election? Is he following a promise he made when he was running? Is he trying to get some other politicians to oppose the bill so he can accuse them of being in favor of profanity and obscenity? Or is he just being rude to the public?

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  17. Contact Senator Ford by Enderandrew · · Score: 5, Informative

    * Robert Ford [D]
            Developer
            Dist. No. 42 - Charleston Co.
    (H) P.O. Box 21302, Charleston, 29413

            Bus. (843) 813-1777 Home (843) 852-0777
    (C) 506 Gressette Bldg., Columbia, 29201

            Bus. (803) 212-6124 Home (803) 798-9220

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.