Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu 9.04 Daily Build Boots In 21.4 Seconds

Pizzutz writes "Softpedia reports that Ubuntu 9.04 Boots in 21.4 Seconds using the current daily build and the newly supported EXT4 file system. From the article: 'There are only two days left until the third Alpha version of the upcoming Ubuntu 9.04 (Jaunty Jackalope) will be available (for testing), and... we couldn't resist the temptation to take the current daily build for a test drive, before our usual screenshot tour, and taste the "sweetness" of that evolutionary EXT4 Linux filesystem. Announced on Christmas Eve, the EXT4 filesystem is now declared stable and it is distributed with version 2.6.28 of the Linux kernel and later. However, the good news is that the EXT4 filesystem was implemented in the upcoming Ubuntu 9.04 Alpha 3 a couple of days ago and it will be available in the Ubuntu Installer, if you choose manual partitioning.' I guess it's finally time to reformat my /home partition..."

17 of 654 comments (clear)

  1. Oh YEAH? by Xtense · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well my TABLE LAMP boots in 50ms! Beat THAT!

    (And to all you electrotech-people, yes, i live in Europe, 50Hz here. You may laugh now.)

    --
    "We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams [...]."
    1. Re:Oh YEAH? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well my TABLE LAMP boots in 50ms! Beat THAT!

      Not using those new-fangled compact fluorescents, are you sonny?

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    2. Re:Oh YEAH? by Xtense · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well there you go, ruin all my fun with your silly math thingamabob. Thanks a lot!

      Oh, and to whoever modded OP as insightful:
      God damn it man, you need to leave your house once in a while.

      --
      "We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams [...]."
    3. Re:Oh YEAH? by Cthefuture · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have to admit, posting from your table lamp is quite impressive. What browser does it run?

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    4. Re:Oh YEAH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Lighthouse 1.8

      I'd like to see Navigator not crash on the rocks without Lighthouse. The Safari would never happen. The Explorer would stay at home.

    5. Re:Oh YEAH? by CannonballHead · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe Weimar has lots of schnitzel?

    6. Re:Oh YEAH? by Linker3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wow, imagine a chandelier of those!

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
  2. I booted up ubuntu just to post by colin_n · · Score: 5, Funny

    Booted into Ubuntu 9.04 just to say "first post". Let's just say the ubuntu folks still have some work to do.

    --

    --------- I have no signature
  3. Re:Also: does "shred" work with it? by elgaard · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, but at least the people make "wipe" are paranoid too:

    From the wipe man page
    ==
    NOTE ABOUT JOURNALING FILESYSTEMS AND SOME RECOMMENDATIONS (JUNE 2004)
                  Journaling filesystems (such as Ext3 or ReiserFS) are now being used by default by most Linux distributions. No secure deletion program that
                  does filesystem-level calls can sanitize files on such filesystems, because sensitive data and metadata can be written to the journal, which can-
                  not be readily accessed. Per-file secure deletion is better implemented in the operating system.

                  Encrypting a whole partition with cryptoloop, for example, does not help very much either, since there is a single key for all the partition.

                  Therefore wipe is best used to sanitize a harddisk before giving it to untrusted parties (i.e. sending your laptop for repair, or selling your
                  disk). Wiping size issues have been hopefully fixed (I apologize for the long delay).

                  Be aware that harddisks are quite intelligent beasts those days. They transparently remap defective blocks. This means that the disk can keep
                  an albeit corrupted (maybe slightly) but inaccessible and unerasable copy of some of your data. Modern disks are said to have about 100% trans-
                  parent remapping capacity. You can have a look at recent discussions on Slashdot.

                  I hereby speculate that harddisks can use the spare remapping area to secretly make copies of your data. Rising totalitarianism makes this
                  almost a certitude. It is quite straightforward to implement some simple filtering schemes that would copy potentially interesting data. Bet-
                  ter, a harddisk can probably detect that a given file is being wiped, and silently make a copy of it, while wiping the original as instructed.

                  Recovering such data is probably easily done with secret IDE/SCSI commands. My guess is that there are agreements between harddisk manufacturers
                  and government agencies. Well-funded mafia hackers should then be able to find those secret commands too.

                  Don't trust your harddisk. Encrypt all your data.

                  Of course this shifts the trust to the computing system, the CPU, and so on. I guess there are also "traps" in the CPU and, in fact, in every
                  sufficiently advanced mass-marketed chip. Wealthy nations can find those. Therefore these are mainly used for criminal investigation and "con-
                  trol of public dissent".

                  People should better think of their computing devices as facilities lended by the DHS.
    ==

  4. Re:Your Goal: One Second or Less by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 5, Funny

    You may enjoy your 26 seconds of pretending that "this is not really happening" - most other people don't.

    Why yes, I do enjoy that very much. I call it "sex".

  5. Re:Your Goal: One Second or Less by Malevolyn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh yeah? Well I optimized my sex down to 23 seconds. Top THAT!

    --
    Your ad here.
  6. Re:Your Goal: One Second or Less by hailukah · · Score: 5, Funny

    All this high technology, what ever happened to doing things by hand?

    --
    "What if I got hit by lightning while walking with an umbrella? Ban umbrellas! Fight the menace of lightning!" Doctorow
  7. Re:Your Goal: One Second or Less by enoz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because Installation of Automatic Updates has completed. Computer will automatically reboot in 5 minutes...

  8. Re:Your Goal: One Second or Less by Sebilrazen · · Score: 4, Funny

    meh, I type my 10+ character password (containing lowercase, uppercase, and numbers) so often that it takes less than 2 seconds.

    IDIOT! Now everyone knows your passwd is Ubuntu904

    I know your post was supposed to be funny, but while you passed the uppercase, lowercase and number criteria, you failed to pass the 10+ characters criteria mentioned.

    --
    "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
  9. Re:Your Goal: One Second or Less by linhares · · Score: 3, Funny

    you don't see the space there?

  10. Re:Your Goal: One Second or Less by camperdave · · Score: 5, Funny

    All I see is **********. Maybe someone else could post their password so we can check it.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!