Slashdot Mirror


Methane On Mars May Indicate Living Planet

Riding with Robots writes "NASA is announcing today that the definitive detection of methane in the Martian atmosphere means the planet is still alive, at least geologically, and perhaps even biologically. 'Methane is quickly destroyed in the Martian atmosphere in a variety of ways, so our discovery of substantial plumes of methane in the northern hemisphere of Mars indicates some ongoing process is releasing the gas,' said one agency scientist. The gas was detected with observations made over over several Martian years with NASA telescopes at Mauna Kea, Hawaii. Both biological and geological processes could explain the methane."

47 of 200 comments (clear)

  1. SBD by Mud_Monster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mars is farting, hehe.

    1. Re:SBD by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Funny

      "We cannot risk contamination of Earth cows' genetics from six-legged Martian cows."

      Oh come on! Everyone knows there are no cows are Mars. Mars has buggalo!

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    2. Re:SBD by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 2, Funny

      "We cannot risk contamination of Earth cows' genetics from six-legged Martian cows."

      What about six-legged turkeys? They'd be great for Thanksgiving and John Madden would no longer have a monopoly on them.

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. UK has the comic character on Mars! by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  4. Greenhouse gas! That stuff is worse than CO2 ... by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 5, Funny

    They'll destroy their environment! If they don't slap some limits on those gas emissions, or come up with a workable credit-trading plan, they'll end up with a dry, dusty, desert planet in no time!

    --
    I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  5. Martian planetary defence system by chebucto · · Score: 4, Funny

    So the martians weren't knocking out our probes because they thought we were attacking - they were just embarrassed about the smell. And to be honest, this revelation does lower my opinion of martians. I think a few eons of evolution might help to teach them some manners.

    --
    The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    1. Re:Martian planetary defence system by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This joke and others like it would be a lot funnier if not for the fact that methane is odorless. It's not the methane you smell in farts, it's all the other stuff the gas picks up on its passage through, well, a tube full of shit.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:Martian planetary defence system by domatic · · Score: 4, Informative

      In particular, mercaptans, hydrogen sulfide, and other sulfur compounds are responsible for most the disagreeable oder of flatus.

  6. Lovelock - Gaia hypothesis strong evidence against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    over 40 years ago Lovelock pointed out that you can tell there is life on earth because the atmosphere is HUGELY out of chemical equilibrium.
    And it is maintained that way due to life on earth.

    He also argued that by the same reasoning, there ain't life on Mars.

    I suspect this bit of disequilibrium is not enough
    to indicate life.

  7. Re:Martian Global Warming by alta · · Score: 2, Funny

    :) Obviously we caused Marsian warming. Or at least us conservatives did it. Do you know how much fossil fuels it takes to get from here to there.

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
  8. It's comeing form the under grround citys there by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's coming form the under ground city's there.

    1. Re:It's comeing form the under grround citys there by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bravo, you misspelt "cities" in two different ways! A good day for humankind indeed.

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    2. Re:It's comeing form the under grround citys there by Hillgiant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yet he misspelled "from" consistently.

      --
      -
  9. Methane On Mars May Indicate Living Planet by wallywam1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Meth on Mars may indicate Martians who need to go to rehab.

  10. Re:*insert martian fart joke here* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    OK, but I don't really care about Methane on Mars. I'm REALLY worried about Methane from Uranus.
    There... is that the joke you were expecting?

  11. Re:Greenhouse gas! That stuff is worse than CO2 .. by mhall119 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not worse than CO2, because it decays relatively quickly in the atmosphere. That's why this find is significant, it means the methane hasn't been in the atmosphere that long, which means there's still an active process on Mars that's putting it there.

    --
    http://www.mhall119.com
  12. Mass Spec by jfp51 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has any probe carried a mass spectrometer? If not that should be a high priority to find out which isotopes are being produced as well, would help answer the organic vs. volcanic question.

  13. Methane on Mars, 2004 by mbone · · Score: 5, Informative

    This was reported by Mars Express in 2004.

    1. Re:Methane on Mars, 2004 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but that's the ESA and the BBC. This time it's an AMERICAN agency reporting on it, so it's newsworthy goddammit!

    2. Re:Methane on Mars, 2004 by sighted · · Score: 5, Informative

      IANAS, but it appears that since these findings were obtained by a completely different process, they provide important confirmation of the Mars Express data--and extend that knowledge in an important way by adding location-specific information. From TFA: "According to the team, the plumes were seen over areas that show evidence of ancient ground ice or flowing water. For example, plumes appeared over northern hemisphere regions such as east of Arabia Terra, the Nili Fossae region, and the south-east quadrant of Syrtis Major, an ancient volcano 1,200 kilometers (about 745 miles) across."

      --
      Saddle up: Riding with Robots
  14. Re:Greenhouse gas! That stuff is worse than CO2 .. by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    there's still an active process on Mars that's putting it there

    Oh, that's just James. He had beans for lunch again.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  15. Re:Martian Global Warming by Hordeking · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think I heard somewhere that methane gas contributes to Global Warming. If Mars is going through Global Warming shouldn't it be renamed to Solar, or even Universal, Warming?

    No. Global refers to the local planet in context. As for universal warming, fat chance of that. Given the universe's expansion and the laws of thermodynamics, the universe will eventually cool to somewhere around 0K (but probably not exactly at 0K, due to quantum vaccuum energy) See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe

    --
    Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
  16. Re:Greenhouse gas! That stuff is worse than CO2 .. by MBGMorden · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think we need a qualifier for "relatively quickly" and "that long" when talking about geologic timescales. When dealing with this sort of thing "relatively quickly" could mean anything from a few months to several million years.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  17. Both are good by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If Mars is geologically active, then it may make geo-thermal power a very real possibility. At the same time, it gives heat for a station as well as greenhouse. If it is biological in nature, all the more interesting.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  18. Re:fart jokes anyone? by PsyciatricHelp · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet Uranus has tons of Methane emmisions.

  19. Re:Lovelock - Gaia hypothesis strong evidence agai by moderatorrater · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I suspect that we don't know enough about how planets with atmospheres but no life behave to be able to determine if there were a chemical equilibrium or not. I also suspect that the people at NASA and most credible scientists believe that the chance of other life in our solar system is very small, but should be investigated anyway.

  20. Let's take that seriously for a moment by Kupfernigk · · Score: 5, Insightful
    We've only explored one planet seriously, and looked at a tiny bit of a moon with extreme temperature variation. Almost everywhere we look on the planet - water, air, surface, crevices in rocks - we find lots of living things and the remains of even more. We find things like thiobacter concretivorans chewing up nuclear reactors. We find complex features that arise through different biological routes - image forming eyes evolve separately at least twice. We find a variety of body plans. We find two different data storage systems, DNA and RNA. The evidence so far is that life appears all over the place and can inhabit moderately sever environments so long as it has a source of energy, an electrolyte, and some stuff around the place suitable for building molecules based on carbon backbones.

    Putting aside some books written by people who thought the Earth was flat, the evidence to date is that where life is possible, there you find it. If you even half accept Popper's falsificationism, it is up to the people who believe that life doesn't appear wherever it is possible to prove that there is no life on Mars. People who believe that life on Mars is probable are actually just accepting that the cumulative evidence of experience is likely to be correct.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Let's take that seriously for a moment by PapayaSF · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I generally agree, but the Gaia hypothesis says a trace amount of methane probably isn't evidence of life. Lovelock's argument regarding Mars was that if there was any life there, it would be easy to tell. The fact that extremophile life exists in niches on Earth doesn't really show that a small amount of extremophile life exists on Mars: over the eons it would have evolved, spread, and altered the Martian environment in ways easy to see. The theory doesn't rule out the possibility that there was once life on Mars that died out, though.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    2. Re:Let's take that seriously for a moment by Shimmer · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are confusing two different concepts. This should be an argument about the prevalence of abiogenesis (i.e. the creation of life from non-life), not the ability of life to adapt to harsh environments.

      On the other hand, it could turn out that there is life on Mars that was carried there from Earth (e.g. via a chunk of rock that was ejected from Earth and landed on Mars). In that case, we're back to marveling at the resilience of our single tree of life.

      --
      The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
    3. Re:Let's take that seriously for a moment by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

      over the eons it would have evolved, spread, and altered the Martian environment in ways easy to see.

      What would you be looking for that would be easy to see?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:Let's take that seriously for a moment by khallow · · Score: 2, Informative

      Atmosphere well out of chemical equilibrium, lots of fossils in martian meteorites, dried husks of large martian life littering the landscape, funky soil types with concentrations of whatever elements martian organisms like.

    5. Re:Let's take that seriously for a moment by E++99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's nothing inherent in life that suggest that it a) be visible to humans, b) cover the surface of the planet, c) visibly (to humans) change the landscape, or even d) ever live on the planet's surface.

      I don't know if the methane is produced by life forms or not. But if it is, I don't think the discovery will be as earth-shattering as it is typically made out to be. I think most people pretty much assume there are other life forms out there somewhere. It could lead to scientific insights once we're able to bring a sample back to earth to examine, but that will be a very long time, and if it ends up looking pretty much like earth life, there won't be that much insight to glean after all.

  21. Oblig. Futurama ref. by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The gas was detected with observations made over several Martian years with NASA smeloscopes at Mauna Kea, Hawaii."

  22. Lovelock - Gaia hypothesis strong evidence against by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I also suspect that the people at NASA and most credible scientists believe that the chance of other life in our solar system is very small, but should be investigated anyway.

    Or perhaps it is just that the people at NASA have figured out that holding up the _possibility_ of other life in our solar system is their surest bet for justifying their continued employment? It is obviously a geologic process, but planetary science is boring... "little green men", on the other hand, is a subject that really gets the ignorant taxpayers excited.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  23. Re:Send in the drill by lwsimon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is the question "Is there oil on Mars?"

    --
    Learn about Photography Basics.
  24. Mars Rovers? by TheSync · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Are any of the Mars Rovers near the methane plume sites?

  25. Re:Yes there could be Life on Mars or... by pclminion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Science doesn't investigate only those things which seem "likely." If we operated that way we'd be nowhere by now.

    Coming from a background of ignorance, how "likely" would you think it was that a lump of some rare metal could be made to explode with the force of thousands of tons of TNT?

  26. Methane is everywhere in the solar system by flyingfsck · · Score: 2, Informative

    Our sun and solar system is a second generation system, made from the rubble of a previous star that went nova billions of years ago.

    Jupiter, and Uranus have red spots that indicate Methane in their lower atmosphere. Some moons of Saturn have lakes and rivers of methane (Titan and Europa). That indicates that methane is older than the solar system and was created in the previous solar system that this one is made from.

    Consequently, the presence of Methane doesn't say anything about the presence of life.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Methane is everywhere in the solar system by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you miss the bit about methane having a very limited persistence in the Martian atmosphere, because of the UV?

    2. Re:Methane is everywhere in the solar system by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Er, no. Just... no. Why would a previous solar system be needed if we can't (by your implicitly logic) form it in ours?

      Methane can easily form in the protosolar nebula and because it was so cold far from the protosun, freeze into ices. The ices went on to compose much of the giant planets and their moons. Since carbon is a relatively abundant element in the universe (and hydrogen is obviously even more so), a lot of methane would have formed. All you need to put the two elements into proximity and wait a bit, no need to invoke a previous solar system. (You do need a previous generation of star to make the carbon, though.)

      Methane on Mars is a different story. You don't expect methane there in any abundance because a) it never was there in large quantities (no ices in that region) and b) what was delivered there can quite reasonably be expected to have broken down by now.

      Also, Europa has no lakes, methane or otherwise.

  27. Re:Lovelock - Gaia hypothesis strong evidence agai by wilder_card · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey, if it's "obviously" a geologic process, would you mind exactly WHAT process it is? Keep in mind that Mars has no current volcanic activity. And if there is/was no life, it's not a fossil fuel.

  28. Deep Hot Biosphere by jdagius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the biggest myths of modern times is the belief that coal and oil are the fossil remains of prehistoric plants and animals. These deposits were created from abiotic hydrocarbon gases deep within the earth. This discovery of methane on Mars may lead to the further discovery of hopanoids or hydrocarbon fuels on Mars and possibly a biomass of organisms similar to ones that are found deep within the earth. Thomas Gold predicted all of this years ago(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Gold). His seminal paper "The Deep,Hot Biosphere", which explains this is available here: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=49434 -Johanus

    1. Re:Deep Hot Biosphere by ColaMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Regarding coal:

      So all the layers of ferns and trees that I find imprinted throughout a 30 foot thick seam of coking coal aren't evidence enough?

      The process of forming coal is well known (Living biosphere -> swamps/peat bogs -> compression from overlying strata -> 5+ million years -> coal, generally)

      Regarding oil: If oil *is* being made 'down there', it sure as hell ain't being made in the quantities we currently use daily.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  29. Methane by mqduck · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wait, methane = life? So that's why aliens always begin with our anuses when studying us.

    --
    Property is theft.
  30. Re:Greenhouse gas! That stuff is worse than CO2 .. by dryeo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Reading this article http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/090115-mars-methane-news.html gives the impression that they're talking months. From the article.

    The methane plumes started to show up in the northern hemisphere spring of Mars, gradually building up and peaking in late summer. At one point during the study, the primary plume contained about 19,000 metric tons (21,000 tons) of methane, comparable to the amount produced at the massive hydrocarbon seep at Coal Pit Point in Santa Barbara, Calif.

    ...

    Short-lived

    Outside of the plumes, methane concentrations were very low, showing that the gas didn't get very far or last very long in the atmosphere. In fact, its lifetime was even shorter than expected or could be explained by the usual method of methane destruction, photolysis (reaction with sunlight).

    So it sounds seasonal.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  31. This story is from 2004! by Iowan41 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Stale, stale, stale. There is nothing new here. Except that the Princeps-Designate is opposed to human space exploration and NASA might be trying to drum up public interest.