This article is about everything EXCEPT the camera itself. Apart from a crappy diagram in the middle, I learnt absolutely nothing about that piece of equipment.
Probably because they have been working with it for decades and it is a known quantity, instead of having to recertify, retest, remanaufacture cooling systems based on something else.
I am not a rocket scientist so this is an educated hunch.
The A380 fleet was never TOTALLY grounded at the same time like the 787. The 20 oldest ones were inspected and the other ones had the check incorporated in their upcoming regularly scheduled maintenance. You are right to say that every new aircraft has teething problems, but this 787 story is completely different and shows the inherent weaknesses of the certification scheme.
I left Fedora after using it for many years because of the Gnome 3 crap-fest. Been using MATE on Mint since then and have been very satisified. Understand that Fedora is cutting edge and used to test and develop new stuff for RHEL but Gnome 3 was unusable (for me, hate it when others make all the UI decisions for me, no minimize because it is against their philosophy, please...)
Going to take out F18 for a spin for sure, always nice to have options. And once again, not bashing Gnome 3, to each their own, it only failed from my point of view!
Rocks clusters (http://www.google.ca/search?gcx=w&ix=c1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=rocks+clusters)
CHARMM (http://www.charmm.org/)
Gaussian as an example of how academic-inspired software should NOT be commercialised (http://www.gaussian.com/)
Is it wise to run a browser (and when Chrome OS comes out, a full fledged operating system) pushed by the biggest advertising, tracking, and marketing company on the web? Wouldn't it be better to use something that does not have a vested interest in tracking everything you do online? Or is the source for this browser fully open so any nasty evil bits would be spotted by vigilant hackers and purged immediately?
Then just use Chromium, you can check the source code all you want to make sure the evil Googles is not getting any of your data...
NPACI Rocks without a doubt. Red Hat centric, you need to put in some work to understand how it ticks, once you so and set up your cluster properly, it is very solid and reliable.
You are correct that the UK and France have their own nuclear arsenal but the way they went about it was completely different. The UK is tied much more closely to US nuclear bomb technology because the US licenses the design to the UK. Of course, the UK maintains launch authority for their warheads. France, on the other hand, developped their nuclear weapons systems from scratch and are completely independent from the US from a manufacturing perspective.
The record companies still don't get that I would pay a decent monthly fee for the legal equivalent of something as well organized as Oink was with the same quality control on the files... Not that I have to anyways but I would.
I guess you think Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.x fails as well don't you? Maybe it is better that you don't use CentOS, don't worry its OK...
Guess you never heard of EPEL (Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux) run by the good folks at Fedora, sure seems GIT is in there (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL).
I know, not an official repo, but then the concept of binary compatibility would probably fly right over your head as well.
Yes because the switch-over to whatever the 'new' distribution would have been called would have been so complicated, I mean the developers even stated in the open letter that:
"(...)hot machines exist to allow for a cutover with a simple one time installation of one RPM package."
Debacle indeed...
Has any probe carried a mass spectrometer? If not that should be a high priority to find out which isotopes are being produced as well, would help answer the organic vs. volcanic question.
You must be too young to rememember when Reagan fired all the striking ATC's in the late 80's. Too bad no one doesn't have the balls to stick it to the unions like he did these days...
The problem is most probably that BT is using ALL your upload bandwidth, this affects every TCP packet coming into your network since there is no upload room for control packets.
In your BT client, limit the upload to 80% of your link's upload speed. For example, I have 1Mbit upload, I limit uTorrent to 80k/sec.
Voila, problem solved.
Videotron has done this with their 10Mbps home plan. You get 100GB/month and they don't throttle. My Bell Sympatico friends were laughing at me with their 'unlimited' bandwidth until they started throttling.
I download a fair amount and I don't even get close to the limit. You can also upgrade to the same speed but business plan if you need real unlimited.
Not saying I am a big fan but it hasn't wound up costing me any extra money, I get the advertised speeds. Comcast's proposed limit is 2.5x mine so it should be even less of a problem.
Slashdot Mirror
Probably because you have to release a french version as well and they do not want to pay the additional expense...
This article is about everything EXCEPT the camera itself. Apart from a crappy diagram in the middle, I learnt absolutely nothing about that piece of equipment.
Probably because they have been working with it for decades and it is a known quantity, instead of having to recertify, retest, remanaufacture cooling systems based on something else. I am not a rocket scientist so this is an educated hunch.
The check-in part at least is nothing new, Fairmont has offered email check-in/out for a few years at least.
My father blew his brains out, I think he took the cowards way out. Only non-victim in a suicide is the person who does it in my opinion...
The A380 fleet was never TOTALLY grounded at the same time like the 787. The 20 oldest ones were inspected and the other ones had the check incorporated in their upcoming regularly scheduled maintenance. You are right to say that every new aircraft has teething problems, but this 787 story is completely different and shows the inherent weaknesses of the certification scheme.
I left Fedora after using it for many years because of the Gnome 3 crap-fest. Been using MATE on Mint since then and have been very satisified. Understand that Fedora is cutting edge and used to test and develop new stuff for RHEL but Gnome 3 was unusable (for me, hate it when others make all the UI decisions for me, no minimize because it is against their philosophy, please...) Going to take out F18 for a spin for sure, always nice to have options. And once again, not bashing Gnome 3, to each their own, it only failed from my point of view!
Rocks clusters (http://www.google.ca/search?gcx=w&ix=c1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=rocks+clusters) CHARMM (http://www.charmm.org/) Gaussian as an example of how academic-inspired software should NOT be commercialised (http://www.gaussian.com/)
Is it wise to run a browser (and when Chrome OS comes out, a full fledged operating system) pushed by the biggest advertising, tracking, and marketing company on the web? Wouldn't it be better to use something that does not have a vested interest in tracking everything you do online? Or is the source for this browser fully open so any nasty evil bits would be spotted by vigilant hackers and purged immediately?
Then just use Chromium, you can check the source code all you want to make sure the evil Googles is not getting any of your data...
NPACI Rocks without a doubt. Red Hat centric, you need to put in some work to understand how it ticks, once you so and set up your cluster properly, it is very solid and reliable.
I am guessing this doesn't include the boatload of private tracker torrenting going on...
... a good number people won't even notice...
You are correct that the UK and France have their own nuclear arsenal but the way they went about it was completely different. The UK is tied much more closely to US nuclear bomb technology because the US licenses the design to the UK. Of course, the UK maintains launch authority for their warheads. France, on the other hand, developped their nuclear weapons systems from scratch and are completely independent from the US from a manufacturing perspective.
The record companies still don't get that I would pay a decent monthly fee for the legal equivalent of something as well organized as Oink was with the same quality control on the files... Not that I have to anyways but I would.
I guess you think Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.x fails as well don't you? Maybe it is better that you don't use CentOS, don't worry its OK... Guess you never heard of EPEL (Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux) run by the good folks at Fedora, sure seems GIT is in there (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL). I know, not an official repo, but then the concept of binary compatibility would probably fly right over your head as well.
Yes because the switch-over to whatever the 'new' distribution would have been called would have been so complicated, I mean the developers even stated in the open letter that: "(...)hot machines exist to allow for a cutover with a simple one time installation of one RPM package." Debacle indeed...
Just download the Rocks Cluster distribution and you will have an operational cluster in about an hour. Doesn't get much more efficient than that
We are using Ganglia for our Rocks cluster and have been very happy with it. Some Rocks installations are huge and it apparently scales very well.
Has any probe carried a mass spectrometer? If not that should be a high priority to find out which isotopes are being produced as well, would help answer the organic vs. volcanic question.
You must be too young to rememember when Reagan fired all the striking ATC's in the late 80's. Too bad no one doesn't have the balls to stick it to the unions like he did these days...
And this is news how? Congratulations Steve Jobs, Apple has become the new Bose!
The problem is most probably that BT is using ALL your upload bandwidth, this affects every TCP packet coming into your network since there is no upload room for control packets. In your BT client, limit the upload to 80% of your link's upload speed. For example, I have 1Mbit upload, I limit uTorrent to 80k/sec. Voila, problem solved.
Videotron has done this with their 10Mbps home plan. You get 100GB/month and they don't throttle. My Bell Sympatico friends were laughing at me with their 'unlimited' bandwidth until they started throttling. I download a fair amount and I don't even get close to the limit. You can also upgrade to the same speed but business plan if you need real unlimited. Not saying I am a big fan but it hasn't wound up costing me any extra money, I get the advertised speeds. Comcast's proposed limit is 2.5x mine so it should be even less of a problem.
I will see your Verilog and raise you an Intercal!
Canada has the Competition Act and also a common law framework that provides the legal basis.