Slashdot Mirror


Edible "Intelligent Pills"

Ian Lamont sends along a brief note from the Industry Standard about "intelligent" pills that can help doctors record information about drug dosages, heart rate, respiratory rate, and other metrics. The pills, being developed by Proteus Biomedicals, have "digestible sensors" made out of food products and are activated by stomach fluids. A receiver that is similar to a skin patch picks up the data and can be passed on to a 3G mobile network, and from there to hospitals or doctors' offices. According to the Proteus site, the sensors cost a few cents per pill. The devices, currently in clinical trials, made #8 on Wired's list of the top technology breakthroughs of 2008.

105 comments

  1. Not what I need by Verteiron · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wake me when they have edible intelligence pills.

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
    1. Re:Not what I need by RichardJenkins · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it.

      Most exciting headline which turned out to be me misreading it EVER.

    2. Re:Not what I need by philspear · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wake me when they have edible intelligence pills.

      That's actually what they are, but the side-effect is either diminished typing skills or diminished grammar skills, not sure which yet though.

    3. Re:Not what I need by Sicily1918 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Waiting patiently for Mentats, eh?

    4. Re:Not what I need by hierophanta · · Score: 1

      those do exist - only you cant have any (HaHA [in nelson voice])

      no seriously they do exist - they are used for Alzheimer's and are very interesting. (actually when you think about it, any treatment for Alzheimer's would be one that makes you smarter ;)

    5. Re:Not what I need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Make sure they're edible ones, I'd hate to have some inedible pills.

    6. Re:Not what I need by Simulant · · Score: 1

          Or better yet, intelligence suppositories.

    7. Re:Not what I need by Starayo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not to mention buffout. Though I always tend to get addicted to the stuff.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:Not what I need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought this thread was about MenTats

    9. Re:Not what I need by JAZ · · Score: 1

      try Adrafinil.

      --


      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -- Homer Simpson
    10. Re:Not what I need by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      Nope. Mentos. The freshmaker...

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    11. Re:Not what I need by enemorales · · Score: 4, Funny

      If these pills are so smart, how is it they cannot avoid been eaten?

    12. Re:Not what I need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I was considering buying stock in the company and then going down the street shoving handfuls down people's throats. Anything. ANYTHING to get us up to the 19th century.

    13. Re:Not what I need by pm_rat_poison · · Score: 0, Redundant

      oh crap, you beat me to the punch and I don't even have a mod point to award you sir! Which kinda sucks, because I would have also increased your Karma. But I guess you can save Megaton and reach Excellent karma pretty fast

    14. Re:Not what I need by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know where your brain is, buddy. I'm not sure I want to know.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    15. Re:Not what I need by Offreality · · Score: 1

      yes yes! I want an Intelligence pill :(

    16. Re:Not what I need by MadUndergrad · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good news! It's a suppository.

    17. Re:Not what I need by ChangelingJane · · Score: 1

      You never know, some dinosaurs had bum brains...

    18. Re:Not what I need by Sinbios · · Score: 1

      I think they call it iodine.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    19. Re:Not what I need by Manuel+M · · Score: 1

      Wake me when they have edible intelligence pills.

      Could they be a substitute for food when we all become zombies and crave for brains?

    20. Re:Not what I need by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Like these? I'm kinda glad they're inedible.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    21. Re:Not what I need by maxume · · Score: 1

      How would a drug that partially compensated for a physiological defect necessarily make someone without the defect smarter?

      I would tend to think that it wouldn't.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    22. Re:Not what I need by __aajoqa250 · · Score: 1

      I have your 30 day supply right here.. I just need your credit card number.

    23. Re:Not what I need by __aajoqa250 · · Score: 1

      One of the awful side effects, though, is a bufferin overflow..

  2. 3G? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    Pills that cost a few cents, tied to a relatively expensive device that needs expensive airtime.
    Not the cleverest plan, especially if you want to bring this to the masses.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:3G? by philspear · · Score: 1

      I'm also confused. Why's everything got to be a phone app these days? Why does my sniper rifle need an ipod? Why's my doctor have to use his blackberry to tell me if I have the clap? Why can I use my phone when the plane is on the ground but not a calculator? ...I guess that last one really didn't have much to do with what I was whining about, but 3 examples just seems better than 2.

    2. Re:3G? by deraj123 · · Score: 1

      Why does my sniper rifle need an ipod?

      Why's my doctor have to use his blackberry to tell me if I have the clap?

      Why not? If somebody wants to produce it, and somebody else thinks it's worth paying for, why not?

    3. Re:3G? by genner · · Score: 1

      Why does my sniper rifle need an ipod?

      Why's my doctor have to use his blackberry to tell me if I have the clap?

      Why not? If somebody wants to produce it, and somebody else thinks it's worth paying for, why not?

      Because it's an abomnation unto the lord.

    4. Re:3G? by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

      cost is your main concern? I don't think your spleen is going to be doing much texting anyway. I'd be concerned about point blank cell phone band radiation. If living under a cell tower gives you cancer and putting the cell phone an inch from your brain maybe causes cancer, what's it going to do when it's touching your tissue? In fact, a year or two ago they had a story on wireless chips inside pets having a ridiculously high cancer rate in the surrounding tissue because of the point blank wireless signals. It's not dangerous at 1 foot away or one inch but the strength gets exponentially as you get closer so when it's 0.001 mm away from your living cells, you've got a problem. At that range, you could probably climb a cell phone tower and lick the transmitter and get less of an intense dose of radiation because you'd still be a couple inches away from the place it emits from.

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    5. Re:3G? by kklein · · Score: 1

      Yeah, progress in the merging of new and existing technology to better and lengthen lives is stupid.

  3. Problems... by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

    What happens when bugs in the software mess this up? In most fields, the computer is always right. And honestly, I don't want the data to be messed up that could cost someone their life.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:Problems... by Swizec · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh you mean like when the computer displayin MRI imagery screws up? Or the computer talking between the hospital and your insurance policy? Or the computer doing traffic lights? Or the computer running your car? Or the computer reading radar data for an air control tower?

      Seriously, there ARE other companies out there making software that are not diebold and can make something as simple as a counter ... hell, they can probably make the complex stuff work too since it's obviously worked rather well in the past.

    2. Re:Problems... by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      Add to this the fact you'd be able to swallow multiple of the same type of pill to ensure the results are correct and you have a decent system.

      No system is 100% failsafe, computerised or not. I really wish these luddites would stop posting on slashdot, it kind of goes against your philosophies.

      You know, what if what you type is malformed into something that deteriorates your character?

  4. Security? by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    can be passed on to a 3G mobile network

    So... how secure is this? I can't imagine anyone other than my doctor (and not even him, probably) are that interested in my biometrics, but I am not comfortable with the information being broadcast over a network.

    The summary links to a stub which links to the actual article, which describes how the network-enabled system could be used:

    Caregivers or relatives will know when and what pills patients have taken or if the patients failed to take their medications.

    So you can watch Grandma forget to take her pills - in real time!

    1. Re:Security? by Snaller · · Score: 1

      "So... how secure is this? I can't imagine anyone other than my doctor (and not even him, probably) are that interested in my biometrics, but I am not comfortable with the information being broadcast over a network. "

      But how else would skynet manipulate with your medicines in order to kill you so you wont start a revolution against it in the future?

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    2. Re:Security? by CompMD · · Score: 1

      Just try snarfing and decrypting CDMA data. Good luck with that.

  5. 8Th? by rcuhljr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Did subby read the article? it placed 9th on the list I saw.

  6. A boon to compliance monitoring by gd23ka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh this is going to be a boon to compliance monitoring. With that kind of 24/7 monitoring
    it becomes easy to really lock down a person's life. All kinds of monitoring comes to mind,
    from drug use to the absence of using prescribed medications, ingestion of approved or
    unapproved foods or even 'unapproved' activities say that raise heartbeat or blood pressure
    or again the lack of activities.

    1. Re:A boon to compliance monitoring by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh this is going to be a boon to compliance monitoring. With that kind of 24/7 monitoring
      it becomes easy to really lock down a person's life.

      boon to compliance monitoring != an increase in compliance.

      Visit 1.
      Doctor: Patient, you need to do A,B,C
      Patient: Doctor, I understand that I need to do A,B,C
      Reality: XY% of patients do whatever they want

      Visit 2.
      Doctor: The tests show that you aren't making as much progress as you should be.
      Patient: I know, [endless list of excuses] is why I haven't.

      The only way to lock down a person's life is to literally lock it down.
      That's why everyone who can afford it does in-patient therapy/rehab/weight loss (or gain)/etc.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:A boon to compliance monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the GP had more Orwellian consequences in mind.

    3. Re:A boon to compliance monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      boon to compliance monitoring != an increase in compliance.

      Compliance monitoring != doctor does the monitoring

      Visit 1.
      Doctor: Patient, you need to do A,B,C
      Patient: Doctor, I understand that I need to do A,B,C

      Reality: Patient forgets to do A,B,C. Phone receives alert that patient forgot to do A,B,C. Phone alerts patient. Patient does A,B,C.

    4. Re:A boon to compliance monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've forgotten all the belligerent douche bags who think they know better than their doctor.

    5. Re:A boon to compliance monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rubbish.

      A lack of compliance with instructions given by doctors can signify several things: either the doctor didn't actually explain well enough why doing A,B,C is necessary or beneficial (particularly true when there's conflicting medical theories about what is best in any given case, and the patient has already talked to other doctors who gave different advice); or the patient simply isn't interested enough in having his condition cured.

      The latter isn't necessarily stupidity, either: it may well be a weighing of trade-offs. If my doctor told me that in order to stop my headaches, I repeatedly have to whack myself with a hammer every day, I wouldn't do that, either: the price I'd pay just wouldn't be worth the benefit.

      Same for weight loss and so on. (Therapy - at least psychotherapy - is a bad example insofar as that it doesn't require you to do actually do anything other than attend; your therapist may suggest you do certain things, but if you find you cannot, that's OK as well, and just means that you're not ready yet). Speaking as someone who's lost almost a hundred pounds last year, I can say that for me, the trade-off was worth it, but I can also see why it might not be to others.

      In the end, the problem is probably that people want to have their cake and eat it, too: they want to be cured of what ails them yet don't want to do anything for it.

    6. Re:A boon to compliance monitoring by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2, Funny

      It does if the pill, on its way out, releases Habanero juice into your guts if it detects that you've been a bad boy and not taken your meds.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    7. Re:A boon to compliance monitoring by DiamondMX · · Score: 1

      You appear to have forgotten that with the overpopulation problem, we could do with pruning a few belligerent douche bags who think they know better than their doctor.
      Let *them* ignore doctor's advice without good reason, see if it kills *me*.

    8. Re:A boon to compliance monitoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let *them* ignore doctor's advice without good reason, see if it kills *me*.

      Belligerent douchebags who think they know better than their doctor and, say, end an antibiotic regime too early allow the most resistant microbes to survive and breed, you catch the newly evolved superbug from douchebag, and bam, you're dead.

      Even without counting resistance increasing mechanisms, the douchebag can spread a serious infectious disease that would've been manageable with medications, or one that can be prevented from spreading by other means. Douchebag has AIDS, but doesn't bother about using prevention or telling you about it since he knows that it's not actually caused by a virus, despite what those stupid know-nothing doctors tell. And bam, you're dead.

  7. Damn! Intelligent Pills don't make me smart by syousef · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone else reading the article think "Hot damn! Now I'll be able to do that PhD, get laid, get rich and retire in 5 years. I just have to pop lots of pills"? Sometimes reading the article (or even the summary in this case) can be a real bummer. I should've known better.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Damn! Intelligent Pills don't make me smart by Metasquares · · Score: 1

      I know you're joking, but wanted to allay a common misconception.

      A Ph. D. doesn't work that way, and however helpful intelligence might be to getting one, it isn't sufficient alone. You also need a large degree of tolerance for absurdity. Actually, I've found Ph. D. comics to be a pretty accurate portrayal of the sort of stuff that goes on in grad. school and academia.

    2. Re:Damn! Intelligent Pills don't make me smart by syousef · · Score: 1

      A Ph. D. doesn't work that way, and however helpful intelligence might be to getting one, it isn't sufficient alone. You also need a large degree of tolerance for absurdity.

      I know. I have a Masters. Part of me wonders if I'll regret never having gone for a PhD. However I could never tolerate the BS and it would be a hellish few years of my life with next to no pay....in a way it's too late for me anyway. I 33, married, and have a 5 month old. If I were going to get a PhD. I should have done it by now, before I had such responsibilities.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    3. Re:Damn! Intelligent Pills don't make me smart by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      add to that a tolerance for vindictive assholery too... or the willingness to out asshole the guy(s) with power over you...

      And the ability/willingness to choke back the truth when it tries to escape your throat... hardest thing I ever had to do as a Ph.D. student was not tell one of my committee members how frigging stupid he was when he asked a question that was answered by the previous 10 minutes of explanation in my defence... sort of like:

      me: and so if you put hot air in the balloon it expands and rises off the ground
      him: Hmmmm, well so do you think that we could get the balloon to rise off the ground if we put hot air in it?

      That example is only slightly over-simplified btw.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    4. Re:Damn! Intelligent Pills don't make me smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wanted the "Make you smarter" pills.

      Everyone else line up if you also thought they were these.

      Damn you science! Damn you!
      Give me Smarties, actual Smarties, not those phony kind that clog up your veins and make you dumber.

  8. Re:If it works, it will become part of society. by religious+freak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Um, because clearly students will want to monitor... their heart rates... while they're ... taking tests(?)... and teachers won't want that to happen? Wha...?

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  9. These pills taste like by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..rabbit shit!"

    "See, you're getting smarter already!"

    1. Re:These pills taste like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..rabbit shit!"

      "See, you're getting smarter already!"

      Ha ha! I was hoping someone posted that old joke :)

  10. Misleading description by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Proteus ingestible event markers (IEMs) are tiny, digestible sensors made from food ingredients, which are activated by stomach fluids after swallowing.

    The IEM is manufactured on silicon wafers...

    Last I checked, humans cannot digest silicon, so this thing is not entirely "made from food ingredients".
    Also, I would have been mighty surprised if food ingredients could transmit digital signals.

    1. Re:Misleading description by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      "Manufactured on" doesn't mean "manufactured out of" so I think you may be jumping to conclusions. The silicon may just form a working surface for the manufacturing process.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    2. Re:Misleading description by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but why would they use silicon at all, then? If they can do the DSP using food-based circuits, then they would not need silicon.
      I would definitely like to see more detail from them.

  11. Oblig. Futurama by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fry: I can't swallow that!
    Farnsworth: Well then, good news! It's a suppository.

    1. Re:Oblig. Futurama by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, as reference humor, IMO this situation calls more for a rephrasing of the line thus:

      Subject: Edible "Intelligent Pills"

      Good news! It's not a suppository!

      and waiting for someone to claim "edible pill" was redundant and posting it as a reply to that. But you've pulled the trigger on that joke.

      Instead now I'll have to find an opportunity to compare "Intelligent Pills" to to "Intelligent Deuterium Ore". Oh, I just did. Well, crap.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  12. Intelligent, edible, inflatable... by argent · · Score: 1

    Once this is combined with Dr Schlock's inflatable technology, Zuul will be unleashed as a giant intelligent edible marshmallow.

  13. And the Aliens by JumpDrive · · Score: 4, Funny

    And all this time the aliens have been probing my ass, when all's they had to do is make me swallow a pill.
    Those bastards.

    1. Re:And the Aliens by bronney · · Score: 1

      are you sure they're aliens?

    2. Re:And the Aliens by sorak · · Score: 1

      What do you think they were looking for? Have you ever tried to pick up a 3g signal in a corn field?

  14. Re:If it works, it will become part of society. by Esc7 · · Score: 1

    Wow, yeah I think this is a new low for slashdot, not only did he not RTFA he didn't RTFS and apparently only RTFH.

  15. Re:If it works, it will become part of society. by gd23ka · · Score: 1

    "After another era it will become accepted for use, and finally required. It's not hard to imagine a course that along side of the necessary books lists the prescription for the drugs you'll be required to take.
    Don't get me wrong though, it's not a bad thing. It's simply society changing. I for one welcome it (and I'm not just playing on the /. gag)"

    You' gotta be kidding but if that's how you feel, I think you're going to really enjoy whatever is coming your way. Don't cry when they drag you off to
    have mandatory prostrate surgery because you're in the age group say 40+ and have a "risk gene". Or maybe they'll put you on a regimen of mandatory
    prophylactic hormone surpression that will make you lose all interests in sex .. yet certain other men find the breasts it is growing you really
    attractive. Or how about some extra Xanax or Paxil to cheer up your days, never mind that the Xanax is giving you extra anxiety at the dosage
    they want you to take it.. hehe nothing to worry about right? It's just society changing and boy you're sure going to welcome that :-)

    Damm I really wish I could see you go through all those mandatory prescriptions and treatments with a smile on your face. I would inject you myself
    with whatever and without any qualms, because you deserve it.

  16. Space Ghost by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

    Thom Yorke: Do you take those... those intelligence drugs?

    SG: I don't need intelligent drugs, Thom, because I don't know what they are. But I will put anything into my mouth that's offered to me, whether it's meant to go there or not! Because... I'm different.

    Thom Yorke (laughing): It's because your weird!

    --
    Read Pynchon.
    1. Re:Space Ghost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tentacle porn?

  17. Is it OK .... by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... to mix these intelligence pills with booze? That way we could break even.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Is it OK .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misread (I think everyone did at first glance); they are intelligent pills. They won't make you smarter, but it will allow a lot more people to know information about your body.

  18. Re:If it works, it will become part of society. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't cry when they drag you off to have mandatory prostrate surgery

    Believe it or not, I actually prefer to be lying down when they operate on me.

  19. Re:If it works, it will become part of society. by Zerth · · Score: 1

    Gym class. Keep your heart rate on target, knock back some sugar just as your blood glucose dips, pop some taurine when your lactic acid starts to rise, etc.

    Or, alternately, atheletes. Those guys will try anything that isn't explicitly outlawed, and many will keep going after it is.

  20. Wired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's number 9 on Wired's list.
    Not eight. :)

  21. Smart pills? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ah! These are the opposite of the stupid pills Mr. Potato head spoke of. Interesting.

  22. Oblig Fallout 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No kidding! I've got terminals to hack.

  23. Digestable intelligent pills by joeyblades · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nit pick, but suppositories not withstanding, most pills are edible...

    Actually, most suppositories are probably edible... but I digest...errr... digress ;-)

  24. 2 cents to make... by jazcap · · Score: 5, Insightful

    200 bucks to buy. That's what I have trouble digesting.

    1. Re:2 cents to make... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      2 cents to make... marginal cost.

      Fixed costs (product development, research, testing, manufacturing equipment, etc) are far higher unless they are selling millions of the pills.

      I know, pharma costs are super high, and the sales/marketing expense side is just disgusting... but it's really annoying when people look at the marginal cost to produce a good and forget that the retail price is influenced by other costs as well.

      Given time, and a mature product and market, perhaps wholesale price will come down somewhat near marginal cost of the pill... but all that overhead still needs to be paid for.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:2 cents to make... by jazcap · · Score: 1

      The marginal costs to produce pharmaceuticals are significant, and often unpredictable. This is especially true of R&D. And drug companies are entitled to recoup those costs, as well as make a reasonable profit. But are they entitled to make a *disgusting* profit? On a product that literally means life or death to the consumer? The pharmaceutical industry is consistently among the most profitable in the world. In several years during this past decade, they have been *the* most profitable. Is this morally justified? In addition, as a taxpayer, I have funded some small part of the vast research efforts that went into the technologies upon which the new developments depend. Doesn't this give me some right to ask my government to place limits on the returns drug companies can expect on their investments? In the absence of regulation, corporations will charge what the market will bear for any good. They will reap whatever profit, obscene or otherwise, that they can-- without regard to the public weal. In the case of pharmaceuticals, this works decidedly *against* the good of the society, as today's out-of-control health care costs clearly demonstrate.

    3. Re:2 cents to make... by djp928 · · Score: 1

      They are "entitled" to make exactly as much profit as the market will bear.

    4. Re:2 cents to make... by jazcap · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, the beloved 'free market'.

      When a free market works against the public good, that market should be regulated. Examples where such control already exists, by one mechanism or another: corporate monopoly, price gouging in times of emergency, the length of the work week for wage earners, the cost of commuting by rail, the price of electricity.

      Admittedly, market controls are difficult to implement, and should be used with caution. But just because things are a certain way, doesn't mean they can't be made better.

      For example, it doesn't seem unreasonable for the American people, as a whole, to negotiate a group rate for medications.

  25. Re:If it works, it will become part of society. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    I have a feeling this will take the same course. It'll be used at first for medicine, yea. But eventually it'll find its way into classrooms, to the disdain of the teachers. After another era it will become accepted for use, and finally required. It's not hard to imagine a course that along side of the necessary books lists the prescription for the drugs you'll be required to take.

    Don't get me wrong though, it's not a bad thing. It's simply society changing. I for one welcome it (and I'm not just playing on the /. gag).

    Everything you think, do, and say
    Is in the pill you took today.

    In the year 4545....

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  26. Re:Yes! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I for one welcome our intelligent pill overlords

    At least they'll be better than our intelligent deuterium ore-valords.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  27. Drink me, eat me. by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This looks like something from "Inner space" sans Dennis Quaid character "Lt. Tuck Pendelton".

  28. "SOMA" brave new world - join the tranqforce by rawdirt · · Score: 1

    from wikipedia...

    "All members of society are conditioned in childhood to hold the values that the World State idealizes. Constant consumption is the bedrock of stability for the World State. Everyone is encouraged to consume the ubiquitous drug, soma. Soma is a hallucinogen that takes users on enjoyable, hangover-free "vacations"."

  29. Re:If it works, it will become part of society. by majpue · · Score: 1

    IntelligenT, not intelligenCE. They record your vitals, not make you smart.

  30. Re:If it works, it will become part of society. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Ain't gonna need your teeth, won't need your eyes
    You won't find a thing to do
    Nobody's gonna look at you...

  31. Re:If it works, it will become part of society. by Belial6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Honestly, that isn't fair. They won't start doing that to the current adults. They will just make it 'mandatory' for entrance into public schools, kind of like immunizations. Then it is just a matter of waiting for it to become universal.

  32. This gives a whole new meaning... by IonOtter · · Score: 1

    ...to the phrase, "Take two of these and call me in the morning."

    --
    [End Of Line]
  33. Re:If it works, it will become part of society. by Hordeking · · Score: 1

    Sounds a bit like THX1138, and not the modern "remaster" that shows people getting out of the way (instead of knocked off the scaffolding).

    --
    Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
  34. activated by stomach fluids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taco Bell?

  35. haha by HermMunster · · Score: 1

    Got to be pretty dumb to swallow that one.

    --
    You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
  36. Straight from Fallout by Kingrames · · Score: 1

    should call them "Mentats."

    --
    If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  37. Blue or Red? by TheCybernator · · Score: 1

    I would prefer the Blue one. Thanks.

  38. Pain meds by agwis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I imagine this is not good news for a number of reasons...but one I can think of personally is pain medication users. Doctors nowadays are hesitant to prescribe schedule II meds because it is closely monitored and there are numerous cases where they have been reprimanded because of it, if not outright losing their licenses and possibly even facing criminal charges.

    Chronic pain sufferers that have sought relief from strong meds inevitably build up tolerance to them, and in turn need to take more to achieve the same effect. Many Doctors assume addiction or worse, that patients are selling their meds (because of the high price they can get on the streets for them) when confronted with requests for higher dosages or quantities. Usually at this point, they try to pawn their patients off to pain clinics (which isn't generally a bad thing), refuse the request, or cut the patient off entirely. Either they don't understand titration or they just don't want to have patients who consume large quantities of pain meds to get the relief they need. Apparently certain types of drugs are monitored and one patient that has a high tolerance can affect the Doctors prescribing ratio, sending a red flag that he needs to be watched more closely. Because of this, many patients subsidize their prescribed drugs with street drugs to achieve the relief they need in order to maintain a decent quality of life. Illegal? Yes. Necessary? Sadly, in more cases than people realize.

    I've seen where Doctors have forced patients to sign contracts with all kinds of stipulations...the consequence of any being broken that they would be immediately cut off and labelled a 'drug seeker'. When this happens, good luck to them getting prescriptions elsewhere. Surely if these 'reporting' pills are cost effective and reliable...it won't be long before most Doctors are requiring all pain patients to use them. Whether it's a lack of trust or not in the Doctor/patient relationship...they need to protect their livelihood and this may end up being the best method.

    1. Re:Pain meds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, this is terrible news! I'm one of those who buy pills off the street (for recreational purposes, of course). I don't want this to screw up the market!

    2. Re:Pain meds by jazcap · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this technology could be used to produce the opposite effect.

      A doctor could know the amount of pain medication a patient was *actually* taking (as opposed to selling on the street, etc.). Also, the doctor would have a record of this usage, to provide CYA.

      The new pills could also provide protection against unscrupulous or incompetent "Dr Feelgoods" who are creating and supplying patients addicted to anti-anxiety medications.

  39. 1970's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dr. Walter Bishop created intelligent pills in his lab back in the 70's.

  40. Re:If it works, it will become part of society. by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    I actually heard that song on the radio the other day. I remember hearing it for the first time at my uncle's house on a 45 - I played it over and over. Sci-fi meets pop music. In case you don't know what we're talking about, it was a song that took a stab at predicting the future in 1010 year increments starting in 2525. I was 4 in 1969 when it was released. Sheesh, that makes me feel old!

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  41. Re:If it works, it will become part of society. by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

    More like an edible (transportable) lie detector? Isn't that what current lie detectors do, check heart rate changes? Even though they can be false, doesn't mean they will always be false.

    --
    Disclaimer: I am not god.
    We may not be created equal
    But we can be treated equal.
  42. Dr. Hanky? by whitelabrat · · Score: 1

    Poo bots? Hiiideee ho!

  43. Re:If it works, it will become part of society. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Ain't gonna need your teeth, won't need your eyes
    You won't find a thing to do
    Nobody's gonna look at you...

    The line is, "You won't find a thing to chew." Hence the lack of teeth.

  44. Here's step two. by vmerc · · Score: 1

    Heck, why don't they just put these intelligent pills in the meds, thereby creating a mandatory monitoring system if you take a prescription drug? If they're so cheap it won't impact the cost of the meds significantly. Since we'll all be on federal welfare health care soon; this, I'm sure, will be on the top of the to-do list. (Referring to US health care of course. All you other suckers around the world are already screwed with national healthcare.)