Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Releases Internet Explorer 8 RC1

mikemuch writes "IE8 has left beta as of noon Pacific time today. The development team now considers the browser platform- and feature-complete, but won't say how long until it goes gold. PCMag.com got an early look and has posted a full review of Internet Explorer 8 RC1. The release candidate differs only slightly from Beta 2, most notably in tweaks to its InPrivate Browsing feature, aka porn mode. That feature has been decoupled with InPrivate Filtering, which blocks third-party content providers from creating profile of your browsing habits. RC1 also improves on performance, especially in startup time, but still trails Firefox and Chrome in JavaScript speed. Protection against the relatively new threat of 'clickjacking,' where a site tries to get you to press buttons underneath a sham frame page, has also been added — the first browser to include such protections. Versions for 32-bit and 64-bit Vista, as well as for 32-bit XP are available, but Windows 7, which will ship with IE8, is stuck with an older beta for now."

31 of 319 comments (clear)

  1. No plugins like Adblock and NoScript by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They can keep all their little incremental security and interface updates. What use are a few little tweaks in IE8, when Firefox offers me add-ons like adblock plus, noscript, slashdotter, etc.? Besides, I can always open a site with IE Tab if I need to.

    Firefox is even nice enough to spell check my form entries for me (it caught me misspelling "incremental" just now).

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:No plugins like Adblock and NoScript by hansamurai · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If it weren't for Chrome and IE8's privacy mode, then that probably wouldn't be the top priority it is right now for Firefox 3.1. Competition is good in the browser market. They'd still be on IE6 if it weren't for the success of Firefox.

    2. Re:No plugins like Adblock and NoScript by not+already+in+use · · Score: 4, Funny
      If you're going to post here on slashdot, you will need to follow a few easy-to-remember rules:
      • Microsoft is inherently evil, their products are assumed to be inferior, whether or not you've actually used them.
      • Firefox and Linux are inherently good. Any shortcomings are to be overlooked. Any references to either must be qualified with "(PBUI)" or "Praise Be Upon It."
      • The only closed-source software in which praise can be given is Opera. You will receive bonus points for non-conformance, especially if you use the e-mail and bit torrent client.
      • Google is evil because they haven't yet ported their browser for a community who will refuse to use it until they also release a plug-in that circumvents their primary revenue stream.

      Thanks! And happy posting.

      --
      Similes are like metaphors
    3. Re:No plugins like Adblock and NoScript by peragrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and that my friend should be the whole point. MSFT basically stopped all browser development for 5 years. Then Firefox came along and showed people that you could have a free browser that could do more than IE(Opera wasn't free but adware). MSFT lost marketshare and then started to fight back.

      MFT is and always has been reactionary to change. If their products are good enough they don't get improved upon. If MSFT only had 60% marketshare I would be happy. as MSFT would be forced to fight to keep customers by improving software.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:No plugins like Adblock and NoScript by moderatorrater · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm 90% certain that there's no way for you to use firebug with IETab because firebug relies on hooks into the rendering engine that Trident won't provide. However, I do know that IE has a web developer toolbar that's moderately useful. I've used it when there's an IE specific bug that I can't narrow down without some help. It doesn't make IE as easy to develop in as Firefox + web developer toolbar + Firebug is, but it's better than nothing.

    5. Re:No plugins like Adblock and NoScript by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

      MFT is and always has been reactionary to change. If their products are good enough they don't get improved upon. If MSFT only had 60% marketshare I would be happy. as MSFT would be forced to fight to keep customers by improving software.

      It doesn't even have to be 60%. It has to be whatever it takes for the majority of Web developers to move from IE-only policy to cross-browser policy. Judging by the look of the Web these days, with even Microsoft itself having to support at least Firefox and Safari apart from IE (check the official browser support tables for various MS web-base products!), the present 20% Firefox market share is already enough to trigger that.

  2. Dear net-surfers: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you use any version of IE and you are not:

    1) Using it out of the box just to download another browser, or
    2) A web developer who needs it on a test box

    Then GTFO idjit.

    1. Re:Dear net-surfers: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Get a thumb drive and Firefox Portable, and all your problems will be solved.

    2. Re:Dear net-surfers: by aurispector · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Heh. The guy I work for has xp machines running on 256mb ram, unpatched ie6 & no sp3. The people he pays to "manage" his system send around a guy that runs spybot, ad-aware and some random virus scanner; He does not know what a rootkit is, nor does he insure all the machines are fully patched (a process that can be fully automated with a single click). When something breaks they order something expensive from Dell and mark it up.

      Bottom line? Morons make the world go around. Grab some popcorn and enjoy the show.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
  3. Clickjacking by DrYak · · Score: 4, Informative

    Protection against the relatively new threat of 'clickjacking,' where a site tries to get you to press buttons underneath a sham frame page, has also been added â" the first browser to include such protections.

    No, not the first. Maybe the first to be shipped with the functionality turned on by default.

    It's just that, with FireFox, anything that isn't related to bare simple display of HTML pages, is usually tucked into separate plugins.
    But the Noscript plugin has featured click-jacking prevention almost from the next day after click-jacking came in the news.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Clickjacking by EvanED · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, not the first. Maybe the first to be shipped with the functionality turned on by default.

      It's more than "turned on by default"; that suggests there's a checkbox somewhere that is just off. The support isn't even installed by default.

      Noscript may have deserved mention in the summary, but there is a difference between "including such protections" and "has such protections available in an add-on", and the difference is much more than between "including such protections turned on by default" and "including such protections turned off by default".

  4. Standards by Mrs.+Grundy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't really care about their tabs, 'Awesome Address and Search Bars,' privacy or really anything else while they still only score 20 on the Acid3 Web standards test. IE has historically been such a pain in the ass for the entire world because of poor adherence to standards. The article says Microsoft takes standards seriously but the test says otherwise.

    1. Re:Standards by Sporkinum · · Score: 3, Informative

      Pretty funny.. I ran it on firefox (which I can't update due to IS) and got 71, Opera (which I can't update due to IS) 85. IE Version 7.0.5730.11 (which IS may or may not update) and it was unintelligble (couldn't even see score), and IE 6 in Citrix which got an 11.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    2. Re:Standards by heffrey · · Score: 5, Funny

      None of the browsers I have tried pass the Acid 3 test so I have given up using the internet. There's really no point if you can't get Acid 3 to go to 100/100.

  5. I just want 6 to go away by bitcastle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah the obligatory complaint about those 30% or so that keep using 6 (according to my stats). Maybe with 8 out 7 will become the 6.

  6. I need stability by skomes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I still use Opera + IE6. Why IE6? Stability. These damn browsers never give up the memory they've taken, although chrome does a better job because it actually runs each tab in a seperate process. With IE6 I open a window, browse youtube, close site, and the memory is returned. I use Opera with javascript turned off, a low overhead browser that will save all my pages if a crash occurs.

  7. Re:No shortcuts by conureman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The only way to open IE at the house is in the "run" tab, the wife and kid don't know where that is.

    --
    The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  8. Awesome compatibility for developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was about to install it when I noticed: Internet Explorer 8 Beta 2 and Visual Studio .NET (version 7.0 from 2002) are currently incompatible. If you install Internet Explorer 8 Beta 2, Visual Studio .NET will crash. No workaround is currently available. Yeah, I kind of need .NET 1.1 to work for some parts of my job.

    1. Re:Awesome compatibility for developers by the+99th+penguin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't worry, there is a way to target .NET 1.1 with VS 2005 and even with VS 2008.

  9. Re:Something to credit Microsoft for by Bogtha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hope that those who loathe Microsoft for whatever reason, now have something to credit it for.

    Yes, when Internet Explorer 8 is released, Microsoft will finally have implemented decent support for CSS 2, a specification published over a decade ago. I hope everybody here on Slashdot will join me in welcoming Microsoft to 1998. Truly, they deserve all the credit they are going to get for being so ahead of the curve. Keep innovating, Microsoft! Don't let those slow-coaches at the W3C hold you back!

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  10. Competitive support for W3C Standards? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No? What's that? Microsoft closed out the bugs as "works as intended?" Fail.

    Something to credit Microsoft for

    In case it's not clear, I have a firey hatred for IE8. Not so much the product itself, but what it represents. What it represents is a flagpole in the ground stating, "We're going to stand in the way of progress for our own selfish reasons".

    While I can understand that Microsoft feels that the market is slipping from their grasp, I cannot support their methods of attempting to compete. Which is to say that they are using their power to prevent competition rather than building a superior product. As Joel pointed out in his excellent article on the Windows API being lost:

    Which means, suddenly, Microsoft's [Windows] API doesn't matter so much. Web applications don't require Windows.

    It's not that Microsoft didn't notice this was happening. Of course they did, and when the implications became clear, they slammed on the brakes. Promising new technologies like HTAs and DHTML were stopped in their tracks. The Internet Explorer team seems to have disappeared; they have been completely missing in action for several years. There's no way Microsoft is going to allow DHTML to get any better than it already is: it's just too dangerous to their core business, the rich client. The big meme at Microsoft these days is: "Microsoft is betting the company on the rich client." You'll see that somewhere in every slide presentation about Longhorn. Joe Beda, from the Avalon team, says that "Avalon, and Longhorn in general, is Microsoft's stake in the ground, saying that we believe power on your desktop, locally sitting there doing cool stuff, is here to stay. We're investing on the desktop, we think it's a good place to be, and we hope we're going to start a wave of excitement..."

    If you truly want to understand what is wrong with this browser, take some time and go through these examples:

    http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/wrongWithIE/

    Those only scratch the surface of what is really wrong with IE and Microsoft's stance on improving their web browser. For further reference, RC1 of IE8 gets a 20/100 on ACID3. This compares poorly to FireFox3's 56-59/100, Webkit nightly's 100/100, and Opera dev version's 100/100(!).

    Developers need to band together and stop hacking our sites for IE. Users who wish to use IE should either be directed toward download links for one of the many alternatives, or forced to deal with a degraded view of the site with a polite comment to upgrade. And by degraded, I mean "it works, but looks awful". If that right there doesn't sell users on getting an alternative browser, I don't know what will.

    (Yes, I am aware that many businesses can't take the hit. But we have to start somewhere. And that somewhere can easily be everything from your personal site to your new venture that's betting on early adopters of advanced web technology. IE's market share is already plummeting. If we can get enough momentum, we can near-eliminate this unsightly browser from the web. Remember Netscape 4's inability to keep up? This is the exact same situation all over again, except this time the solution is not a total mono-culture.)

    1. Re:Competitive support for W3C Standards? by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'd like to note that the latest Shiretoko (Firefox 3.1) nightly gets around 93/100 on Acid3, since you're comparing nightly versions of Webkit and Opera. I also think it's been at 93/100 for a while, and I don't think they're focusing on getting 100% for 3.1 as much as just getting it out the door at this point.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
  11. Interesting statistic by elashish14 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IE shipping with a feature before FF has it ( private browsing mode).

    Well that's something you don't see every day.

    --
    I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    1. Re:Interesting statistic by Matthieu+Araman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      humm, both IE8 and Firefox 3.1 will include a private browsing feature but neither have "shipped".
      But you're right that IE included it before in a beta and that increased the priority on the firefox people...
      Time will say which of these version ship the first (in a non beta, non rc mode)

  12. after how you've treated me? by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There may be a number of good technical and use-oriented reasons not to bother with IE8. I don't know the details on it just yet. But it could be twice as good as the next browser and I still wouldn't use it. Not after what Microsoft did to us all with earlier versions. The standards compliance problems have been infuriating for developers. How much human effort has been wasted trying to cope with this? And the vulnerabilities have made popular computing a diseased seething mass. How many geeks have had to spend evenings or whole weekends taking care friends and family members' systems?

    All of that and Microsoft let IE rot for how many years? Half a freakin' decade in the midst of humanity's glorious ascension into a networked era? It took competition forcefully wedging its way into IE's monopolistic stranglehold before Microsoft got off their asses to do anything.

    Well, it's too late. Fuck off.

    I'm no battered wife. I know that MS isn't "really a good husband, he just..." whatever. I'd rather other people not drag me into another round of this same neglected-until-it-matters-to-Microsoft bullshit. The fewer people who use IE, the better.

  13. Re:Getting verrry old by malakai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This has been a very active couple of days for MS stories. Lots of big things happening between layoffs and beta releases.
    Let's look at some facts though.

    30% of the postings on any given page are given over to MS. That goes beyond happenstance and statistical probability, right into an obvious bent for the evil empire. An empire that never deserved ink in the first place.

    Windows marketshare is 90%.
    IE's marketshare is 70%
    Slashdot users run somwhere between 47% and 70% MS Windows based OS.(http://slashdot.org/pollBooth.pl?qid=1516&aid=-1, http://slashdot.org/pollBooth.pl?qid=848&aid=-1)

    In the last four days Slashdot has had 9 MS stories ( source: http://slashdot.org/search.pl?tid=109)
    In the last four days Slashdot has has 97 stories posted ( source: http://slashdot.org/search.pl )

    What percentage of stories about MS have run in the past four days?
    9/97 = 0.092 * 100 = 9.2%

    Facts hardly look as bad as you make them out to be.

  14. One Additional And Vital Posting Rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    * When you are composing your +5 Insightful masterpiece of a post that utterly eviscerates a company for an alleged GPL copyright violation you have to do so while listening to your multi-terrabyte pirated(aka copyright violation) music collection.

  15. Re:No shortcuts by PitaBred · · Score: 4, Funny

    If his gay lover is anything like IE, I'd certainly hope so. No one should be exposed to that kind of depravity.

  16. Re:Something to credit Microsoft for by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, when Internet Explorer 8 is released, Microsoft will finally have implemented decent support for CSS 2, a specification published over a decade ago. I hope everybody here on Slashdot will join me in welcoming Microsoft to 1998.

    You'd have had a point if, in 1998, there was any other browser, released or in beta, that had full CSS2 support. But there wasn't. In fact, the one that was closest to supporting it at that time was... IE.

  17. Re:Something to credit Microsoft for by gbarules2999 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ubuntu 8.04 shipped with Firefox 3.0 beta.

  18. Excuse me, did you say IE 4,234.5 ? by unity100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    as a web developer, im still having to deal with IE6 to ensure cross browser compatibility, and a little lost on the versioning now. how many shitface versions of ie out there that i have to test for x browser compatibility as of now ? 3 ? 5 ? 234,643 ? will it ever end ?