Slashdot Mirror


Google Earth To Show Ocean Floor

f1vlad writes "Google is expected to announce the addition of ocean floor imagery to its Google Earth project, which will complete digital representation of our planet. 'The existing site, to which an estimated 400 million people have had access, already includes three-dimensional representations of large cities around the world and includes images from street-level and aerial photography covering thousands of miles across Britain and elsewhere. The new additions to the website are expected to include views of the ocean, and portions of the seabed. They will also provide detailed environmental data that will enhance information about the effect of climate change on the world's seas and oceans.'"

46 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. Well, there goes my plan by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone want to buy a slightly used underwater marijuana farm?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Well, there goes my plan by xch13fx · · Score: 5, Funny

      is it in international water? Cuz you could make it a point of interest and have boats come take "tours." Just don't let the Somalians find out.

    2. Re:Well, there goes my plan by wooferhound · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't even worry about my land-based marijuana farm in my hometown
      Google hasn't updated the maps around here for 10 years . . .

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    3. Re:Well, there goes my plan by Tridus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah it's the same here. They can get the ocean floors in, but can't get anything even resembling a recent image of my area.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    4. Re:Well, there goes my plan by spartacus_prime · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know a certain Olympic swimming who might be in the market.

      --
      If you can read this, it means that I bothered to log in.
    5. Re:Well, there goes my plan by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Plus Emilio Largo is going to have to move his secret operations.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    6. Re:Well, there goes my plan by Chyeld · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Since they just display the most recent imagery that their providers have, the issue isn't with Google but the fact that appearently no one considers your plot of land important enough to actually photograph. If you want an ego boost, find out how much it costs to charter one of the companies providing the aerial photography to do a fly by of your area.

    7. Re:Well, there goes my plan by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's really an excellent starter lair. I'm hoping to sell to a young evil genius couple. Though it's not really ready for world domination, it's probably just fine for country-wide domination. And while it's true that I had to turn the shark tank into a grow bed, everything is still wheelchair-accessible and cat-friendly. The laser cannon still works too, but the power bill is a real bitch if you use it.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re:Well, there goes my plan by berend+botje · · Score: 5, Funny

      Even better is that the imagery of my part of the world has regressed! Two years ago the data was quite current. Now, however, the data seems about five years old.

      So what's the deal with that?

    9. Re:Well, there goes my plan by ConanG · · Score: 2, Informative

      You make a good point. However, Google Earth now has an option to regress the date of the imagery along a timeline. You click the timeline button, and you can slide it back and forth and see older satellite images along with the date of the photo. My area, although fairly rural, has imagery back to '95 and as recent as '07.

    10. Re:Well, there goes my plan by Chyeld · · Score: 3, Informative

      Coincidently enough, your answer was published today.

      http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3927935&c=FEA&s=BUS

      Waiting for Profits in Space
      GeoEye Fights Delays With New Imaging Satellite
      By ANTONIE BOESSENKOOL
      Published: 2 February 2009

      Anyone who's used Google Earth has likely seen images from GeoEye, a Dulles, Va., Earth-imaging company. The Internet giant allows users to zoom in from a view of a continent to a car on the street by using images from GeoEye, along with ones from competitor DigitalGlobe, the U.S. Geological Survey and elsewhere.

      GeoEye has used its flagship Ikonos satellite to provide images for Google and the U.S. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), its biggest customer. But those customers - and investors - have been waiting for GeoEye-1, the company's newest satellite, to become fully operational.

      GeoEye-1 has faced delays from launch to operation, and as a result, the company has been missing out on revenues under a new NGA contract.

      GeoEye-1, a two-story-tall satellite built by a contractor team led by General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, is the world's highest-resolution commercial Earth-imaging satellite, according to the company. The first image the satellite took was of Kutztown University in Pennsylvania; a tennis player is visible about to serve the ball.

      GeoEye-1's launch, originally planned for the first quarter of 2007, finally took place last Sept. 6. Work went slower than planned, then the launch was bumped to allow Boeing Launch Services to give priority to a U.S. government launch. Once in orbit, the satellite suffered from delays in calibrating its accuracy and testing its software. The process, which normally takes up to three months, has lasted five so far, according to GeoEye spokes-man Mark Brender.

      GeoEye has told investors for several months that the company is nearing the end of this phase. Matt O'Connell, the company's president and chief executive, said the GeoEye-1 satellite should be fully operational at least by the end of the first quarter of 2009, though GeoEye is aiming for sometime this month.

      "We're still in the process of fine-tuning the accuracy," O'Connell said. "You make a change, you do a couple of orbits, you look at the imagery, you test it, you find what you think might be a bug, you do another change. So it's an iterative process, so it takes a while."

      The process now is focusing on aligning the positional accuracy of the satellite with the GPS grid, he said. "We're all disappointed that it hasn't gone faster. But we're excited that we are nearing the end of the tunnel."

      O'Connell said testing that he's seen lately makes him more confident that GeoEye-1 is getting closer to becoming fully operational, as more glitches are eliminated and the satellite is "hitting accuracy levels that are near our target."

      What's hanging in the balance is a new Service Level Agreement with the NGA that would boost GeoEye's revenues. Once GeoEye-1 is operational and the NGA certifies GeoEye-1 images as meeting the agency's standards, NGA will buy $12.5 million in GeoEye-1 images a month under its NextView program. That will give GeoEye a consistent revenue source after somewhat bumpy revenues in recent quarters. Revenues were down 24 percent to $106 million for the first nine months of 2008.

      GeoEye's competitor, DigitalGlobe, won the first contract under the NextView program. Its satellite, WorldView-3, provides black-and-white images to NGA.

      "We're comfortable the GeoEye is on a path that's going to have [GeoEye-1] operational and available for NGA taskings," NGA spokesman Dave Burpee said.

      In the meantime, the NGA and Google keep buying images from Ikonos, which was launched in 1999 by GeoEye's predecessor company, Space Imaging. GeoEye was formed in 2006 when OrbImage, a company O'Connell also headed, bought Space Imaging, a Lockheed Martin-Raytheon joint venture.

  2. Two words. by AltGrendel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Marianas Trench.
    Can't wait to see how that looks.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:Two words. by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Marianas Trench.
      Can't wait to see how that looks.

      Really, really dark.

    2. Re:Two words. by ionix5891 · · Score: 5, Funny

      remember goatse? well think deeper and darker

    3. Re:Two words. by nevillethedevil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      remember goatse? well think deeper and darker

      What has been seen cannot be unseen.

      --
      Be gone from my sight or prepare to feel my flaming wraith!
  3. Whoops by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if a few of my "special jobs" as a concrete mixer will show up on these maps. If so, anyone got a list of countries without an extradition treaty with the U.S.?

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Whoops by Kickersny.com · · Score: 5, Funny

      If so, anyone got a list of countries without an extradition treaty with the U.S.?

      Wikipedia has a list for everything.

  4. Floating Garbage Islands in the Pacific Ocean by Vandil+X · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps now we'll be able to see those massive floating garbage islands in the Pacific Ocean that we're always hearing about.

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
    1. Re:Floating Garbage Islands in the Pacific Ocean by darkitecture · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps now we'll be able to see those massive floating garbage islands in the Pacific Ocean that we're always hearing about.

      You mean New Zealand?

    2. Re:Floating Garbage Islands in the Pacific Ocean by jammindice · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps now we'll be able to see those massive floating garbage islands in the Pacific Ocean that we're always hearing about.

      You mean New Zealand?

      I believe he meant Australia, he did say massive

      --
      - My uid ends in 69...
    3. Re:Floating Garbage Islands in the Pacific Ocean by foniksonik · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah New Zealand is just one big Hollywood back lot nowadays....

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    4. Re:Floating Garbage Islands in the Pacific Ocean by Ihmhi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You'd be modded Flamebait if any Aussies could actually get through their Internet filter to Slashdot.

    5. Re:Floating Garbage Islands in the Pacific Ocean by RabidMoose · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is it still flamebaiting, if those who would be baited are blocked?

    6. Re:Floating Garbage Islands in the Pacific Ocean by Ihmhi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, that's like... some Morpheus shit right there.

      Like... if a troll posts on a forum and there's no one to read it, does he still masturbate furiously to Buffy the Vampire Slayer / Willow lesbian fanfic?

  5. Slight modifications by Thanshin · · Score: 5, Funny

    And now they'll have to adapt the vans that do the street level photography. Some fish are going to be quite surprised.

    Who wouldn't want to spend a month in a van and take several hundred million identical pictures? (Any resemblance with your holidays is pure coincidence).

    1. Re:Slight modifications by owlnation · · Score: 2, Funny

      And now they'll have to adapt the vans that do the street level photography. Some fish are going to be quite surprised.

      Not to mention the van drivers will be surprised when they encounter the sharks with frickin lasers.

  6. in addition to shipwrecks... by wisebabo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are some other sites that not everyone will be pleased will be in the public domain.

    How about the locations of sunken nuclear subs like the Thresher and the Russian sub the Glomar Challenger went after? There are some nuclear warheads still down there!

    Aren't there also a couple of nukes still "lost at sea" but with the approximate locations known?

    Also, how about the plutonium in the Apollo 13 Lunar Module that was impacted in "the deep Pacific"?

    My point is with rent-a-submersible services available (I guess from primarily, you guessed it, Russian vendors) it might be possible to pick up some dangerous things. In addition there are a few ecological sites (some "black smokers") that Oceanographers have been trying to keep secret to preserve them. Other than that, it seems like a great idea!

    1. Re:in addition to shipwrecks... by furby076 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      These objects aren't just lost because they don't know where they are (satellites have been able to bypass the water for object detection for a while now). The problem with retrieving these items is the depth, or danger. So to retrieve these items you need to have advanced submarine technology...and if you have that, you probably have nuclear weapons. But even if you have that, submarines still cannot penetrate the deepest parts of our oceans, and even if they could --- how does a submarine wrap a hook on another object? It would need robotic arms (the pressure would kill a scuba diver). So while a potential issue, it is VERY hard/impossible to retrieve such objects with todays technologies.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
  7. 10% coverage to start - I find that impressive by Bearhouse · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "FTA: Although, so far, there has been only limited data collected about the sea floor, with just 10% of the habitat mapped at any useful scale for science..."

    I wonder how is going to work, since I'm guessing they cannot really 'map' the bottom of the ocean in the same way they do surface objects. Satellites with radar, ships with sonar?

    Stil, considering how vast the oceans are, even 10% coverage is pretty impressive.

  8. Hasn't this already happened? by Sir_Dill · · Score: 4, Informative
    I was perusing Google earth the other day and I noticed that the sea floor was already shown with some coastal areas being VERY detailed.

    check out the northwest coast of the US for a good example.

    I don't know if this is an example of whats to come or if whats to come is going to be even better but I welcome higher resolution imagery of our planet.

    1. Re:Hasn't this already happened? by ignavus · · Score: 3, Funny

      but I welcome higher resolution imagery of our planet

      but I welcome higher resolution imagery of sunken treasure ships.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
  9. Ocean, the (short term) final frontier by gmuslera · · Score: 3, Funny

    In the land version we can see even people and cars. What we will see there? Submarines? Fishes? Coral formations? Our sunken economy?

  10. Re:Google's world domination by TeXMaster · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    "I'm never quite so stupid as when I'm being smart" (Linus van Pelt)
  11. This will backfire bigtime. by tjstork · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The ocean is so large and so vast, that, if Google codes the images honestly, that, people will readily see that for the most part, the bottom of the ocean is generally unexplored, that measurements of deep waters are infrequent and not in very many areas. They will see a few tiny areas where things have been photographed extensively, but, those will be but small points on a very, very large map. All of this unknown will open up ocean climate claims to ridicule, as if, measuring a drop of water in the shallow end of the swimming pool can somehow categorize the whole thing.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:This will backfire bigtime. by Spinalcold · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's one of the points, to show people how little we know of the ocean. It could possibly help the science community exchange ideas on the ocean or maybe even fuel more interest into exploring those large expanses.

    2. Re:This will backfire bigtime. by tjstork · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's one of the points, to show people how little we know of the ocean

      Oh, I agree that it could be that, and I also agree that we should be exploring the bottom of the ocean more, in fact, we ought ought to be monitoring it with a permanent deep sea measuring network.

      --
      This is my sig.
  12. Re:"street-level and aerial photography " by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In Google Maps and Google Earth, Massachusetts is all aerial photography, because the state pays for and supplies it under an open content (but perhaps not Open Content) license. If you zoom in on the northeast US, you can see Massachusetts very well defined from a pretty high zoom.

  13. Thor's twins? by sl8r · · Score: 3, Funny

    Finally, the russians will be able to find Red October!

  14. Re:"street-level and aerial photography " by nmg196 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nearly all the street-level photos on Google Maps are aerial rather than satellite. If you can see windows in houses or road markings, then they are definitely aerial. Publically available satellite imagery is rarely much better than 1m resolution but some of the best govenment operated satellites claim to have resolutions comparable to aerial photos (I've not seen any samples myself though).

  15. Re:What is next? by iceteep · · Score: 2, Informative

    already done.... http://www.google.com/mars/

  16. Re:Ooops.... This is what happens... by fifedrum · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ha! the street view car that hit the deer, the accident occurred about 3 miles from my house. In their defense, there are thousands of deer roaming the area, so many that car deer collisions are a daily thing, and it's not at all uncommon to see a carcass on the side of the road.

    The undersea stuff is interesting because it might give a top-down view of wrecks if the wreck is in shallow water.

  17. how about updating the existing terrestrial maps.. by slashdout · · Score: 2

    The terrestrial maps are outdated, I would love to see updated terrestrial maps instead of gazing at the ocean floor.

  18. Re:Ship Wrecks by furby076 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well this will only detail the top, and maybe slightly angular, shots of wrecks. This will helpe us find lost wrecks. But as a diver I can tell you this will not replace scuba diving by any means....to see gorgeous coral, fish life, and go inside caves/wrecks is something you can only experience in person....video doesn't begin to capture the feeling...of being dinner for a school of barricuda :D

    --

    I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
  19. Re:Ship Wrecks by Chyeld · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, myself... I'm waiting for them to get Streetview of the ocean floor....

  20. Update the Land Imagery by winjama · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would be more impressed if they updated all of the above water land maps. I live in Belize and our imagery hasn't been updated in about five years. Dave

    --
    Ubi est voluntas, ibi est via
  21. Sigh... by CobaltTiger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Living in Iowa, I'm still waiting for my house not to look like a white blob. Random jungles and deserts already have better resolution than most of our state, and now it sounds like the sea floor will as well. I know Iowa isn't the biggest state out there, but can't we get a little love?