Microsoft Ramps Up "Fix it" Support Tool
CWmike writes "Microsoft has ramped up its new Windows support assistant 'Fix it for me' nearly three months after it quietly released the automatic repair and configuration tool. The upgrade adds a 'Fix it' button to some of the support documents that Microsoft posts to its Knowledge Base. The blog introducing the changes lists some of the Knowledge Base documents that boast the 'Fix it' button, including one that prevents users from connecting a USB storage device — useful in protecting against one of the infection vectors of the 'Downadup' worm. Have ideas for the tool? In a forum on the 'WinVistaClub' Web site, someone who said he was part of the 'Fix it' team at Microsoft encouraged users to send feedback on the feature to the group at fixit4me@microsoft.com."
What happens when the "fix it tool" itself breaks?
I have a bad feeling about this...
This seems rather exploitable, I wonder how long before we have viruses that hijack this application when an infected user tries to use it. They are better off with a good online knowledge base for common problems than some 'fix it for me' tool. Education is the key to solving the most common issues. I remember removing a number of viruses and spyware from this one ladies computer. She would then promptly go back and download the 'games' that gave her the viruses in the first place. Great for income, not so great when the customers accuses of you not fixing a problem the first time around. More times than not I feel like I should be working on the user instead of the PC. I guess all this goes back to the teach a man to fish analogy.
The problem with her computer was between the chair and the keyboard. Anyway, to shorten the story, I asked her if she's ever Googled for answer to her problems or looked at the manual. Nope.
Folks like that who would actually benefit from something like that will never come across it because they don't even think of searching the net for a solution; let alone of actually reading the manual and following the trouble shooting guide in the back.
People like us, tech savy, will never trust a script like that from MS.
This is doomed to fail.
I've always thought it was strange how KB articles can get to have some really complicated actions, yet they can't just give you a script to do what they're telling you to do.
And then they have the nerve to tell us Linux is complicated.
It can be installed in one click too, so it would be great for this kind of thing (although i don't actually suggest we try that, it would make people think linux was just a virus or something).
That's a stupid idea anyway. Linux is about choice. We only take the willing :)
Amazing. This is what it takes to solve many Microsoft-related problems (ones that aren't "solved" by reinstalling something, which isn't a solution), yet thousands of Windows fanboys proudly thump their chests at how usable it is, while making snotty remarks if a Linux user has to so much as glance sideways at an xterm.
And at least in Linux, a cursory knowledge of any Unix-based system is enough to get around. There are manpages for stuff. There are things that explain what these options or those switches do, and logfiles to help you understand what's going wrong, so there are ways to figure out, on your own, what to do.
I'm a veteran user/admin of both systems and the above KB article, and tons more like it, completely flummox me. Sure, I could mindlessly execute the instructions but there's no way I'd ever figure out to do any of that on my own, and I don't see any way to deduce any of it either. To even understand half of it requires some knowledge of should-be-obsolete-by-now DOS hijinks. And just what the hell is "SET BLASTER=A220 I5 D1 P330 T3"?
It just astonishes me that gibberish like the above, or having to manually expand cab files, or alter hex values buried thirteen layers deep in the registry, or extract files out of a CD by hand, is considered okay by so many, but god forbid you instruct a user to "apt-get install" something, because ha! ha! that's just difficult and non-intuitive!
mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.