Slashdot Mirror


UK Can't Read Its Own ID Cards

An anonymous reader writes "Despite the introduction of ID cards last November, it has emerged that Britain has no readers that are able to read the cards' microchips, which contain the person's fingerprints and other biometric information. With cops and border guards unable to use the cards to check a person's identity, critics are calling the £4.7bn scheme 'farcical' and a 'waste of time.'"

60 of 205 comments (clear)

  1. No readers? No surprise! by IBBoard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I won't go as far as being paranoid about "it was always the governments plan and they just want the data on everyone", it doesn't surprise me that our government isn't even capable of introducing both halves of an ID scheme at the same time.

    Until they fix it they've basically just introduced an over-expensive photo ID. Well done, Labour!

    1. Re:No readers? No surprise! by segedunum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I won't go as far as being paranoid about "it was always the governments plan and they just want the data on everyone", it doesn't surprise me that our government isn't even capable of introducing both halves of an ID scheme at the same time.

      I'm even more cynical than that. While the government will probably get some data on people, judging from other such projects that have gone before it will be extremely poorly coordinated and it will be a far bigger security risk than anything else because they won't be able to keep a lid on the data. It just strikes me that a lot of companies have got cosy with the government, promising them things that are almost certainly not going to work in order to fleece them of billions of pounds. Billions of borrowed pounds in the current climate, that is.

    2. Re:No readers? No surprise! by RegularFry · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm more convinced by "it was always the government's plan and they just wanted to dole out juicy contracts to the private sector."

      --
      Reality is the ultimate Rorschach.
    3. Re:No readers? No surprise! by Zumbs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think that it's more a question of whipping up fear in the population and then reap the popularity by appearing to "do something" to keep the population safe (and docile?). In any case, the fact that the ID cards can't be read, pretty clearly suggests that the "increased safety" argument were a load of horse manure.

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    4. Re:No readers? No surprise! by zeldorf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's actually worse than that, because they are so rare no one really knows what they look like!

      On two seperate occaisions I've seen someone trying to use national ID cards as proof of age when buying alcohol. Both times they were refused because the staff didn't recognise the card.

      The whole thing is a total waste of time and (our) money, all with the goal of filling a void that does not exist!

  2. privacy by justhatched · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is a security measure

    1. Re:privacy by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      except everybody BUT the gov't can read them...

      it's funny, but sad-funny.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:privacy by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean job security for the police. If they put the criminal element out of business with an ID program that works, then the government would need fewer police. With a half-ass ID program, both police and the criminal elements can breath easier.

    3. Re:privacy by Llanfairpwllgwyngyll · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's like "plug and play" - that worked 50% too. As in, "plug" always worked, it was just the "play" bit that had problems...

    4. Re:privacy by Hyppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How exactly does "an ID program that works" eliminate all crime?

    5. Re:privacy by Rigrig · · Score: 2, Funny

      Simple: you implement RFC 3514 on the passports.

      --
      **TODO** [X] Steal someone elses sig.
  3. Look at Belgium by houghi · · Score: 3, Informative

    Stop making fun at Belgium and follow in their food steps. The readers are available and the source is open Dutch: http://eid.belgium.be/nl/Achtergrondinfo/De_eID_technisch/
    Main thing is that you see there are Linux drivers for it.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Look at Belgium by u38cg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or alternatively, we could spend the money on something useful, like giving every child a pony.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    2. Re:Look at Belgium by Nick+Fel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mmmm... food steps.

    3. Re:Look at Belgium by AlXtreme · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Stop making fun at Belgium and follow in their food steps.

      *puts mayonnaise on his fries*

      Joking aside, it seems like the Belgians have done this right: You need a code to access the information from the passport, similar to your bank/creditcard. Not perfect, but at least it isn't readable by everyone.

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
    4. Re:Look at Belgium by michaeldot · · Score: 3, Funny

      Microchipped pony.

    5. Re:Look at Belgium by Goffee71 · · Score: 5, Funny

      and when the credit crunch really bites, pony sausages and a nice warm coat

      --
      If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
    6. Re:Look at Belgium by blaine+the+monorail · · Score: 3, Informative

      Interestingly, the first year the new ID cards were issued in Belgium, there was also a shortage of readers in police departments. If you had a new ID card, you were required to keep a printout of the data with you in case the police requested your ID :-) (it wasn't that bad though; the only information on the chip that isn't also on the front of the card, is your address)
      The police have enough readers now, so it's not necessary anymore.

    7. Re:Look at Belgium by rHBa · · Score: 5, Funny

      We could call it the OPPC project

    8. Re:Look at Belgium by sortius_nod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, not everyone, just the people with the desire to get the code... which won't be hard.

    9. Re:Look at Belgium by berend+botje · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm Dutch and we also put copious amounts of mayo on our fries. And even though "we" are in friendly rivalry with those wacky Belgians (well, the Flemish anyway) I will readily admit that the Belgians have the upper hand on us with regards to fries. And mayo, and certainly beer. Oh, and waffles. And chocolate.

      Although I can't imagine how drunk they must have been to invent 'tartarsauce' for on their fries... :-)

    10. Re:Look at Belgium by digitig · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe, but we were talking about eating it.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    11. Re:Look at Belgium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here in america we just slap in an unencoded RFID chip readable by anyone driving by. They tell us this makes us safer and more secure.

  4. Where exactly are these cards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The cards dont exist yet and wont until 2011 or 2012.

    Still, dont let truth get in the way of a good rant.

    1. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Its partly true, part headline grabbing. Some foreigners have been issued with cards, more as a trial than anything else, and readers outside this trial havn't been bought yet.

      Not much of a story really.

    2. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFA: "The first UK ID cards have already been issued - but no UK police officers or border guards have any way of reading the data stored on them.". They are already issuing them to asylum seekers, people freed from Gitmo, etc.

      Maybe thats the plan - just say "sorry, just wait over there until we can read your card. You should be allowed into the UK sometime soon".

    3. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by u38cg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, you can get one if you want one, and certain classes of people have to have them - asylum seekers, airport workers, and a few other categories. Perhaps gypsies and jews should be added to the list, *sigh*.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    4. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by Archtech · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, the first ID cards were issued last year (2008).

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    5. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not just asylum seekers, anyone here on a settlement visa. My wife's got to have a card now, even though she's here fully legitimately and I'm a full-fledged British citizen andsubject of HRH Queen Elizabeth the Second. And students are next in line, which as a PhD researcher means yours truly. If you refuse? Well, you lose your visa or your student status as appropriate. They're targetting those that are least able to object in order to build up an "installed base".

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    6. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by u38cg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you know the funny thing though? My girlfriend is Brazilian, and she resides in the UK through her father having dual Portuguese/Brazilian nationality. By European law, she can't be required to have an ID card (and no-one seems to have asked, either) and unless she goes for UK citizenship, never will. This amuses me especially because both Portugal and Brazil do have mandatory ID cards.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    7. Re:Where exactly are these cards? by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Informative

      For a troll with a supposed interest in history you don't seem to get that "limey" is an insult you'd use against an Englishman, and that England is a subset of Britain, not the whole. So you manage to fail basic trolling, basic geography, basic social history, and by implication would fail basic politics. That's an astounding failure rate for someone who takes so much time out of his day for lofty proclaimations and trolling on Slashdot. You'd think that you'd pick some of the basics up by osmosis if nothing else.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  5. Dad's Army by BBadhedgehog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is anyone really surprised? There are people out there who still don't believe that Dad's Army was an early example of reality TV. Government competence levels have not improved in the ensuing years.

    --
    Will you PLEASE F off with the Fing beta now?
  6. Identity crisis by RDW · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Right now most bookmakers will give you very good odds on the current government actually being in power by the end of 2010. Since the other lot are supposedly going to get rid of the scheme, and there's been no large-scale rollout of the cards to the general population, it probably doesn't make a lot of sense to buy all the readers just now. Not that 'sense' really comes into this, of course.

  7. You don't say. by greenguy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Britain has no readers that are able to the cards' microchip

    Hey, we all know how hard it can be to a card's microchip.

    --
    What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
    1. Re:You don't say. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I accidentally the card's microchip, is this bad? :(

    2. Re:You don't say. by BobisOnlyBob · · Score: 5, Funny

      That sentence no verb!! You have no idea how much that me. >:(

    3. Re:You don't say. by molecular · · Score: 5, Funny

      I accidentally the card's microchip, is this bad? :(

      not if you didn't the chip on purpose, then you only have to money, not to jail.

    4. Re:You don't say. by Rigrig · · Score: 2, Funny

      As long as you didn't the card's microchip you can just the card's microchip, that should the card's microchip. Just don't accidentally the card's microchip.

      --
      **TODO** [X] Steal someone elses sig.
    5. Re:You don't say. by Bazman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was going to explain this meme to people but someone seems to have accidentally the whole of encyclopediadramatica.org

      Google cache tiem:

      http://74.125.77.132/search?q=cache:w7oVzuVvJRYJ:encyclopediadramatica.com/I_accidentally_X+accidentally+encyclopediadramatica&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=uk&client=firefox-a

  8. Kids these days by jsse · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yesterday you rant about giving up too much piracy, today you rant about them not being readable? I pity those cluelessnesses' failure in appreciating the beauty of unbreakable security with Write-Only-Memory(WOM) technology from Sygnetics in 1972.

    Enough about it. Get off my lawn.

    1. Re:Kids these days by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can't you see the irony here?

      The government does something no one wants, acting as if it knows best, then fucks the implementation up in ways few thought about making it worthless for the time being. It's like the drunk who swears he is able to drive, refuses to give up his keys, then gets into an accident before he gets out of the parking spot.

  9. t Britain has no readers that are able... by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Funny

    Britain has no readers that are able to the cards' microchip,

    No problem, can't we just take them round to the Russian embassy? I'm sure that they are quite capable of reading all our microchips.

    1. Re:t Britain has no readers that are able... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      can't we just take them round to the Russian embassy?

      The embassy of USA would be more appropriate - that's where all this crap is coming from.

  10. Re:"in response to an FoI request"?!? by Xest · · Score: 4, Informative

    About 9 years ago.

  11. Re:Offtopic? by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is offtopic. "Dad's Army" was at best tangentially related to the government.

    What you want is "Yes, Minister". Down the corridor, third on the left.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  12. It was never about reading the cards at the border by getuid() · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It was about biometric databases, computer-recognizable photographs and humongous amounts of fingerprints.

  13. Be careful by Archtech · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's easy, and quite tempting, to react to this news with patronizing contempt - and think, "Well, at least we're fairly safe - such a bunch of bunglers couldn't do any real harm".

    Unfortunately, a look back at history reveals that appalling inefficiency and incompetence have usually gone hand-in-hand with authoritarian government. But whereas we can still laugh about it, the time may come when doing so is distinctly unwise. People made fun of Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini throughout their careers, and some got away with it. Others were arrested, beaten up, imprisoned, tortured, shot, or hanged with piano wire.

    --
    I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  14. Why is this news? by DavidR1991 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They've only just started finalising and using these cards. Why is it surprising that there are no readers around?

    It's akin to saying that Blu-Ray or DVDs were a waste of time because initially there were no players for them - Hello, you need to wait for people to catch up, especially if the equipment is expensive (and although they're not consumer products, the same rules apply - places need to wait for grants or work out their budgets before buying or using said machines).

    Besides, practically no-one has these cards yet - and I doubt anyone will for a while, especially since they cost cash to get (It was ~£50 last I heard)

    1. Re:Why is this news? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, at least with BluRay and DVD, there were people who actually wanted them. Yes, really, these people did exist.

      Now show me one border patrol person that is eager to get yet another thingamajig into their hands that means more work for the same pay?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  15. Re:"in response to an FoI request"?!? by Davidis · · Score: 5, Informative

    Freedom of Information Act 2000 Only exceptions to this in government is the Official secrets act. which means the information comes out in 50 years. this is better than the US where 90% of it never comes out at all. The Act

  16. Re:"in response to an FoI request"?!? by Archtech · · Score: 2, Funny

    the uk has a FOIA? srsly, when did this happen?

    I can't disclose that. It's a state secret.

    --
    I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  17. Re:"in response to an FoI request"?!? by JohnBailey · · Score: 5, Funny

    About 9 years ago.

    It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying "Beware of The Leopard.

    --
    It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
  18. /oblig "fixed that for you" by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny

    What you want is "Yes, Minister". Down the corridor, third on the left.

    I'm sorry, this is abuse. You want "Yes, Minister". Down the corridor, third on the left.

    Stupid git.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  19. Re:"in response to an FoI request"?!? by XSpud · · Score: 5, Informative

    Exceptions include information other that that covered by the Official Secrets Act.

    There are also a whole lot of exemptions, such as data that is commercially sensitive, related to criminal investigations or where disclosure would contravene the Data Protection Act etc. When a request is refused the reason for the exemption must be given to the requester.

    In practise the Act has meant a lot of information is now public where it wouldn't have been before.

  20. HRH Queen Elizabeth the Second?! by pjt33 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Her Royal Highness? Did Her Majesty abdicate?

    1. Re:HRH Queen Elizabeth the Second?! by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is why I normally use the Royal Etiquitte Add-On for Firefox. Stupid work PC.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  21. The readers aren't important by rabbitfood · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It's admittedly odd that taxpayers are forced to pay for the scheme, targeted minorities are forced to buy the cards, the but the authorities can decide whether or not it's a sensible use of money.

    On the other hand, there isn't much point having the readers unless there's a reason to suspect the bearer's identity. As the scheme is voluntary, those with suspect identities won't be the first in the queue for the cards. As law-enforcement will only interested in those without cards, then there's not much point buying in them buying readers. That doesn't, on the other hand, invalidate the cards, which do still serve a purpose.

    At present, the standard identification document is the gas bill which, naturally, discriminates against tenants, people without a gas supply and people who have pre-pay meters (usually the poor). The cards therefore improve the ability of poor people to pay for the privilege of 'interacting with government', and thus improve both 'social mobility' and 'engagement'. In addition, a card with a picture on it has to be arguably more reliable than a piece of paper that can be borrowed out of a dustbin by anyone with a mind to.

  22. No problem by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2

    I'm sure someone found a way to read them and the data will be uploaded to the net soon like a lot of government data.

  23. Google will fix it by Kupfernigk · · Score: 2, Insightful
    They'll have drive-by readers for their Google locate-a-UK-citizen webapp.

    The thing that worries me is that the downturn means that people now working at Google, Microsoft etc. will be released into the community and will then get Government jobs. One thing worse than pervasive Govt paranoia and spying is efficient pervasive government paranoia and spying.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  24. Re:"in response to an FoI request"?!? by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Act is really good, and you can tell that because it is annoying the fuck out of the present government.

    --
    "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."