Slashdot Mirror


German Bundeswehr Recruiting Hackers

bad_alloc writes "Heise.de tells us about the German Bundeswehr's idea of recruiting hackers in order to 'penetrate, manipulate and damage hostile networks.' (Note: The following passage has been translated from German into English: 'The Regiment is stationed in Rheinbach, near Bonn, and consists of several dozen graduates from Bundeswehr universities. They're training at the moment, but the 'hackers in uniforms' are supposed to be operational by next year. This regiment officially belongs to the "Kommando Strategische Aufklärung" (strategic reconnaissance) and is commanded by Brigadier General Friedrich Wilhelm Kriesel. The Bundeswehr has not said anything to this regiment yet.' You can find the full article in German."

156 comments

  1. Just asking. by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Funny

    So why does a beer company need Hacker Kommandos? Is it because they're Beglium now?

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Just asking. by Neoprofin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So I'm not the only one who read that as Budweiser!

    2. Re:Just asking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yo --pickup=the_phone echo "Wazzaap?!!!";

    3. Re:Just asking. by houghi · · Score: 1

      Why would that be confused with a beer brewery?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    4. Re:Just asking. by HangingChad · · Score: 1

      So I'm not the only one who read that as Budweiser!

      Just what I was thinking. Free beer and Euro-babes. Sign me up!

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    5. Re:Just asking. by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Using unnecessarily pretentious language (such as calling the German army "The Bundeswehr" instead of just saying "German army") is always a bad idea. On Slashdot it's positively dangerous!

    6. Re:Just asking. by pseudochaos · · Score: 0

      How is calling the German army by its official name in any way pretentious? 'Accurate' is more like it.

      --
      "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle
  2. Re:That's great and all, but... by andy1307 · · Score: 5, Funny

    what with this being an english site and all.

    This being slashdot and all, nobody would actually read the article anyway.

  3. Is this really news? by blool · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would think most modern nations employ hackers these days. I'm sure much of America's hacking talent make a tidy salary working for the NSA.

    1. Re:Is this really news? by arogier · · Score: 5, Funny

      But NSA hackers don't get spiffy uniforms. If a cyberspace world war breaks out Das Keyboard might become a documentary as opposed to just... a keyboard.

    2. Re:Is this really news? by Nathrael · · Score: 4, Informative

      NSA hackers don't, but USAF hackers do. The Air Force has it's own "Cyber Command". There even has been an article on /. about that some time ago iirc.

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
    3. Re:Is this really news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NSA hackers

      NSA Hackers sure do. There aren't many civilian NSA hackers. They're mostly army.

    4. Re:Is this really news? by arogier · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression the funding for the Airforce cyber command hackers was on the rocks for the time being...

    5. Re:Is this really news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps so, but NATO has a center of cyber defence in Estonia. I would be surprised if it had no hackers in uniforms.

    6. Re:Is this really news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "There are plenty of nuclear powers already, so I don't understand why it is news Iran may be trying to build nuclear weapons." :P

    7. Re:Is this really news? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Since they are hackers, they probably get T-shirts with some text on it, like "All your base are belong to us!"

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    8. Re:Is this really news? by laejoh · · Score: 1

      LOL! Beautiful! I bow(*) to you, sir!

      The bow of Das Boat of course! ;)

    9. Re:Is this really news? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1
      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    10. Re:Is this really news? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of opinion as to whether USAF uniforms are "spiffy". Some of us think they look like bus drivers...

    11. Re:Is this really news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, the AFCYBER program has been largely shelfed, mostly because of complaints by the Navy that it was unfair that they had no involvement. Additionally, have the Sec of the Air Force and some of the other top command fired due to other occurrences did not help their case.

    12. Re:Is this really news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmmm....http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/08/air-force-suspe.html

    13. Re:Is this really news? by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      USAF personnel have been noted for complaining that the current USAF uniforms just make them look like passenger airline pilots. Aside from the epaulets, there's really no difference between the USAF class A uniform and a moderately well cut civilian suit.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    14. Re:Is this really news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    15. Re:Is this really news? by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Would you want to be the commander of that unit?

      airman 1: Is my helmet on straight?

      airman 2: When do we get those female robots the recruiters promised us?

      airman 3: Where are the Doritos and Red Bull? These MREs really suck...

  4. In English by toppromulan · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:In English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need for bad translations. The article is available on english:
      http://www.heise-online.co.uk/news/Report-claims-German-armed-forces-setting-
      up-cyberwar-unit--/112595

  5. IT Work by snowgirl · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The first sentence of TFA says that "not only will it do the security of IT systems but also carry out..."

    Why does everyone focus immediately on the "black hat" side of the story, and neglect that the group is supposed to do BOTH sides, which in some ways, is a good aspect of ANY security team... just hopefully, your security team follows ethics.

    And I imagine that the Bundeswehr is going to follow ethics as well, "no hacking friendly networks......... overtly".

    --
    WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    1. Re:IT Work by Dreen · · Score: 1

      Same reason why exorcists are taboo topic regarding the church

    2. Re:IT Work by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``just hopefully, your security team follows ethics''

      Which, of course, isn't unique to security teams.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    3. Re:IT Work by meist3r · · Score: 1

      Why does everyone focus immediately on the "black hat" side of the story, and neglect that the group is supposed to do BOTH sides, which in some ways, is a good aspect of ANY security team... just hopefully, your security team follows ethics.

      Because in general, the military is not exactly known for it's humanitarian altruistic approach. Most military define security by going into the enemies home and screwing them there.

    4. Re:IT Work by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because there are other white hat units. Having a unit made in order to carry out black hat operations is News For Nerds, Stuff That Matters.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    5. Re:IT Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just hopefully, your security team follows ethics.

      Haha, that's a good one!

    6. Re:IT Work by Jens+Egon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why does everyone focus immediately on the "black hat" side of the story, and neglect that the group is supposed to do BOTH sides, which in some ways, is a good aspect of ANY security team... just hopefully, your security team follows ethics.

      Because in general, the military is not exactly known for it's humanitarian altruistic approach. Most military define security by going into the enemies home and screwing them there.

      Which is why the majority of soldiers in the "Democratic" Republic of Congo has AIDS.

      I hope our German friends have better security than that.

  6. The German Bundeswehr by NineNine · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ahh, the German Bundeswehr. Of course! I was wondering what those guys were up to.

    Who or what is the German Bundeswehr and why should I care?

    Timmy, great article, by the way. 99% of your readers have no idea what it's about.

    1. Re:The German Bundeswehr by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2, Funny

      German Armed Forces. It's a reasonably well known term even in the English speaking world not to mention that it only takes a second to google it and it can be inferred fairly easily from the summary as well. Now, linking to an article in German without any kind of English translation, that is pretty dumb

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    2. Re:The German Bundeswehr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://letmegooglethatforyou.com/?q=bundeswehr

      oh, the German Armed Forces

      idiot

    3. Re:The German Bundeswehr by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

      It's the German army. I don't think it's that difficult to figure it out from context for English readers, but I speak German so I'm probably not the best person to make that judgment.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    4. Re:The German Bundeswehr by ImYourVirus · · Score: 1

      Right.

      --
      Why is common sense called that if it's not common?
    5. Re:The German Bundeswehr by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      Timmy, great article, by the way. 99% of your readers have no idea what it's about.

      Only 1% of Slashdot readers know how to use Google translate?

    6. Re:The German Bundeswehr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who or what is the German Bundeswehr and why should I care?

      Why don't you just shut up and listen?

    7. Re:The German Bundeswehr by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's the German Army.

      Now I'll yield the floor for Godwin.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:The German Bundeswehr by ImYourVirus · · Score: 1

      Wrong. But right on google, but were lazy here. ;) And yeah no translation = why the fuck did you post it.

      --
      Why is common sense called that if it's not common?
    9. Re:The German Bundeswehr by ImYourVirus · · Score: 1

      Dude translate is a bit dodgy at best, does the phrase 'do not want' ring a bell? Anyhow... lol

      --
      Why is common sense called that if it's not common?
    10. Re:The German Bundeswehr by nephridium · · Score: 1

      It's the German Army.

      Now I'll yield the floor for Godwin.

      Grandparent was as ignorant as a Nazi.. ;)

      Jokes aside though, one of the things the Germans learned from WWII was not to have an army only consisting of professional soldiers, who live in their own bubble and are shielded from contact with the 'normal' people (e.g. simply by just living in army bases). That way it is much easier to control them and give them orders normal people would not follow so blindly.

      The current Bundeswehr consists of people being drafted from the normal population.

      --


      And when you gaze long enough into the code, the code will also gaze into you.
    11. Re:The German Bundeswehr by aliquis · · Score: 2, Informative
    12. Re:The German Bundeswehr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats not really true
      the bundeswehr consists mainly of hired people just like the american army, the difference is that every male german over 18 has to spent 9 months serving the bundeswehr to get some basic training.

    13. Re:The German Bundeswehr by brezel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      being proud of you own ignorance sure makes you look like a hero!

    14. Re:The German Bundeswehr by nephridium · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ok I wasn't clear. From Wikipedia: "The Bundeswehr has 200,500 professional soldiers, 55,000 18-25 year-old conscripts who serve for at least nine months under current rules [4], and 2,500 active reservists at any given time." So 20% of the soldiers are still obtained from the "normal" population (and some of them will stay to become professional soldiers).

      --


      And when you gaze long enough into the code, the code will also gaze into you.
    15. Re:The German Bundeswehr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe you're rational.

    16. Re:The German Bundeswehr by SchwarzeReiter · · Score: 1

      Ahh, the German Bundeswehr. Of course! I was wondering what those guys were up to.

      Who or what is the German Bundeswehr and why should I care?

      Jeez, guys, nobody ever saw a WWII movie?

      Timmy, great article, by the way. 99% of your readers have no idea what it's about.

      It's not the fault of the poster, that you are all illiterate, and do exchange czech beer manufacturers (Budweiser) with one your few remaining allies, who's ass is still on line in your f**ked up war in Afganisthan. (Bundeswehr)

    17. Re:The German Bundeswehr by silanea · · Score: 1

      The current Bundeswehr consists of people being drafted from the normal population.

      (Emphasis mine)

      I would certainly contest that. The Draftees, for the most part, are a nice enough crowd, but God help us should we ever have to engage in a full-scale military operation against a traditional armed force. The median IQ on the "executional" level is not exactly stunning, to say the least.

      The Bundeswehr has quite a history of misplacing vehicles and weapons on their own exercise areas, and I had the questionable pleasure of experiencing first-hand how prone to getting lost even with maps and GPS a lot of the lower rank officers are. Horrifying, really. Our OpenStreetmap volunteers and geo cachers can muster better strategic movement than our citizens in uniform.

      There certainly are very fine men and women in our armed services, and I mean no disrespect to them. But the Bundeswehr as a whole is an embarrassment. Part of that is due to underfunding, part is due to infighting amongst branches, part is simply due to stupidity, and the rest gets whacked by politics: No-one wants our soldiers to go anywhere because of Germany's past image, so they get bad gear and budget cuts, but when an opportunity arises to look good internationally (so-called peace-keeping etc.) our politicians are all too eager to ship them out by the thousands in no time. Our army is too small and underpowered to defend us, but too immobile and too badly managed to attack anyone.

      --
      Rudolf Hess edited Mein Kampf. He was the very first grammar nazi.
    18. Re:The German Bundeswehr by rastos1 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Who or what is the German Bundeswehr and why should I care?

      Because everyone knows what is US navy or USAF ... You should care because US has just managed to pull whole world into financial crisis, so we would appreciate if you look a bit further then inside of your borders.

    19. Re:The German Bundeswehr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Jeez, guys, nobody ever saw a WWII movie?

      You haven't, apparently. Otherwise you'd know that it was the Wehrmacht back then, the Bundeswehr came to existence only a decade after the war.

    20. Re:The German Bundeswehr by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      Reichswehr
      Wehrmacht
      Bundeswehr / Nationale Volksarmee
      Bundeswehr

      Armed Forces. Means literally "Federal Defense"

    21. Re:The German Bundeswehr by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      Now, linking to an article in German without any kind of English translation, that is pretty dumb

      Why? Who here's gonna notice?

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    22. Re:The German Bundeswehr by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Now I'll yield the floor for Godwin.

      So, this is the WindowSS division ? Do their caps Death Head's have their skulls replaced with computers displaying the Blue Screen of Death ?

      Oh, I can smell the burning karma... at least I hope it's just karma.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    23. Re:The German Bundeswehr by SchwarzeReiter · · Score: 1

      Jeez, guys, nobody ever saw a WWII movie?

      You haven't, apparently. Otherwise you'd know that it was the Wehrmacht back then, the Bundeswehr came to existence only a decade after the war.

      Good point, but it would be interesting to know, what the 1955 Bundeswehr soldiers have done between 39-45. And don't tell me, that all of them were kids that time. Or can the leopard change his spots where you come from?

    24. Re:The German Bundeswehr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but those 55000 will never be used for actual combat!
      well maybe in a worst case scenario where germanys future is at stake or something but you wont find them in afghanistan!

    25. Re:The German Bundeswehr by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      So the grammar sucks. It's still better than the grammar of most posters here.

    26. Re:The German Bundeswehr by ImYourVirus · · Score: 1

      Well not only grammar but some of the words don't translate well either, or are in the wrong spot or left out entirely. Sometimes it makes no sense whatsoever, but anyways I digress...

      --
      Why is common sense called that if it's not common?
    27. Re:The German Bundeswehr by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      What do you mean, "do not want"? As soon as German-speaking people have "corrected" the sentences of this article on Google Translate it should be fairly readable...

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
    28. Re:The German Bundeswehr by ImYourVirus · · Score: 1

      It's from Starwars episode 2 translated from English to Chinese and then back to English again.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBsm2HiLubY

      Granted if they are fixed by people that actually know what it should say then that would be different, but when, if ever does that ever happen?

      --
      Why is common sense called that if it's not common?
    29. Re:The German Bundeswehr by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see! I never knew that that phrase actually had an origin. Interesting to know.

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
    30. Re:The German Bundeswehr by ImYourVirus · · Score: 1

      Yeah there's a whole slew of funny lines from that movie in other clips, I've seen some that are several minutes before, just have to search about for them.

      Happy hunting.

      --
      Why is common sense called that if it's not common?
  7. Hackers as the government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not have the hackers be the government? :)
    http://www.metagovernment.org/wiki/Main_Page

  8. Re:That's great and all, but... by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 0, Troll

    That doesn't mean we need to encourage them.

  9. Re:That's great and all, but... by tpgp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... it would be nice if you could post a link to a full article in English, what with this being an english site and all. No, babelfish doesn't count.

    Yes, we should ignore all foreign articles until they've been officially translated, even tho' translation tools are adequate to give you the gist of an article

    I mean - it's not like there's any Germans who read Slashdot & will translate in the comments or anything is it?

    --
    My pics.
  10. Sweet... by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Bundeswehr is recruiting hackers? I'm sure Bayern Munich will get the top recruits as they often do, though I'll keep rooting for FC Kaiserslautern (FCK). Football and hacking finally meet, and I'm in heaven.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    1. Re:Sweet... by Steemers · · Score: 2

      The Bundeswehr is german military.
      Did all you beer and football confused people not pay attention in school, or was the second world war only lightly touched upon?

    2. Re:Sweet... by cj1127 · · Score: 1

      -1, sense of humour failure

    3. Re:Sweet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Except during WWII the German armed forces were known as the Wehrmacht, not Bundeswehr.

    4. Re:Sweet... by Steemers · · Score: 1

      I thought the poster was talking about the Bundesliga, the (football) league, and that it was a mistake.

    5. Re:Sweet... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      You're not going to find many references to the Bundeswehr in histories of World War II. You're more likelly to hear about the Wehrmacht.

    6. Re:Sweet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Bundeswehr was called Wehrmacht in WW2, and Reichswehr before 1934.

    7. Re:Sweet... by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      It was called a "joke." You'll find numerous definitions and descriptions of a concept called "humor" if you search the web. Were you too busy paying attention in school to develop a sense of humor, or were you actually a participant of the first world war? Have a Budweiser, watch a Bundesliga match, and don't worry, no one was trying to mess with the Bundeswehr. (We know what happens when they get mad.)

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  11. very informative! by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    "And even if the cyber attack on Estonia in retrospect, not as a "war" browsed meanwhile shall any State which is a substantial electronic IT infrastructure operates, potential threats posed by cyber attacks seriously."

    1. Re:very informative! by raffnix · · Score: 1

      The actual source of the heise.de article seems to be an article on the website of the German magazine "Der Spiegel" which can be found here: http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/tech/0,1518,606096,00.html It seems that those guys are actually mostly graduates from Bundeswehr universities meaning the "recruiting hackers" theme is not really correct. (remarking this as a native German speaker). The rest of the article is rather uniformative though..

    2. Re:very informative! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny

      The rest of the article is rather uniformative though..

      (emphasize by me)

      Well, it's about military, so uniforms shouldn't be a surprise ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:very informative! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have to ask my Mexican maid to read it, she can translate it from her "English" to our English.

    4. Re:very informative! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get it, now. GP used the wrong word, it's not "uniformative", it should've been "unformative"! Right?

    5. Re:very informative! by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      uniformative

      Meaning they keep talking about these uniforms a lot?

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
  12. Re:That's great and all, but... by aliquis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jaja, aber Kartoffelbrei, ich bin mit der Fernsehturm verheiraten. I can fix it for you! Super hero acht klar!

    Dieses hax0rs wollen siene gelÃck zu hax0r nicht-unsere aber others netwÃrk getesten. Jemand wollen SS uniformen zugaben before entlich der communist volk probieren sind!

    Or well, maybe I leave it to the native germans after all.

  13. Meh, typical reporting. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not impressed with their attention to details. For example, the Estonia situation they refer to as "a cyberwar that did not turn into a real war" was never even a cyberwar. This should be old news by now.

    But, if they had done proper fact checking they would know that it was caused by a 15 year old Estonian kid on his own who was angry the government of Estonia moved a communist era statue to a secluded spot. It is sort of scary that there are reporters who still believe it was a Russian cyberwar.

    That would be like people believing Columbine was a large-scale neo-nazi uprising, when in reality it was just a couple of disturbed/deluded 15 year olds with a chip on their shoulder, a copy of Mein Kampf, and too many hours playing Doom in god mode.

    1. Re:Meh, typical reporting. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      neo-nazi uprising, when in reality it was just a couple of disturbed/deluded 15 year olds with a chip on their shoulder, a copy of Mein Kampf

      That sounds just like all the neo-nazis before their first few years in prison.

  14. German Bundeswehr Recruiting Hackers by agrippa_cash · · Score: 3, Funny

    RE:German Bundeswehr Recruiting Hackers If it tastes anything like American Bundeswehr, they'll have a hard time keeping them.

    1. Re:German Bundeswehr Recruiting Hackers by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      If it tastes anything like American Bundeswehr, they'll have a hard time keeping them.

      No, this is Germany. They're more likely to drink Budweiser Budvar :)

  15. Re:That's great and all, but... by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If it's a major, huge, timely event, sure, fine. If it's some minor story about, okay, bundeswehr (who are they? why do I care?) recruiting hackers (because no other company/military/whatever the hell they are does that, clearly), then either translate it before submitting or wait for some English news source to pick it up.

  16. Re:That's great and all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps you could post a link to an English version of the article instead of just complaining that somebody else didn't?

    No?

    Perhaps you should just keep your whining to yourself then.

    P.S. If you don't like Babelfish, vielleicht sollst du Deutsch lernen.

  17. Oh god by whong09 · · Score: 1

    It's like Project Icarus all over again.

  18. Actually... by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Actually, the constitutional safeguards still work in Germany, so it will likely be more like "no hacking anyone else's networks ever, unless we've already properly declared war and the bureaucracy is done approving the paperwork." (At which point the war is probably over anyway.)

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  19. Finally... my chance to escape the MAFIAA! by macraig · · Score: 1

    Where do I sign up? Can we keep it quiet?

  20. Good times for security professionals by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Not that it will be really difficult keeping these pople out, but many networks have not been attacked because of lack of an attacker. One more group that fills the role and increases the need for working defenses. Incidentially, bad times for Microsoft as well and generally for systems without competent administrators. But then, a competent administrator was allways and likely will allways be a requirement for professional computing. C

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  21. Important issue missing in TFA by should_be_linear · · Score: 1

    If I sign, will they give me that cool german helmet?

    --
    839*929
    1. Re:Important issue missing in TFA by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you want the Stahlhelm or the Pickelhaube?

  22. The Essence of Military is Privateering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just goes further to show that anything and everything normally considered a criminal activity can be chartered from the state as either "military" or "intelligence" and then glorified.

    However, military networks could be fortified against hacking, rendering this kind of formations almost completely useless (at least against military infrastructure): just design them utterly paranoid inside, like e.g. TOR, and establish procedures and safeguards against social engineering, by dehumanizing personal interaction over networks: forbid voice communication, limit and supervise use of free form text, especially emoticons, forbid all improvisations, shortcuts and workarounds on tactical levels IT (reroute any such thing to "special circumstances" staff, who would be required to have elevated level of healthy paranoia).

    1. Re:The Essence of Military is Privateering... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      forbid all improvisations, shortcuts and workarounds on tactical levels IT (reroute any such thing to "special circumstances" staff, who would be required to have elevated level of healthy paranoia)

      You are in a war. There's that enemy airplane approaching you. You know that your armation will not survive the attack, so your only chance to survive is to shoot that plane. However, your weapons are defunct due to some computer problem. There's currently no "special circumstances" staff there. However there's someone there with the necessary knowledge to fix it, and he'd have a chance to fix it before the enemy plane arrives. But there's this damn directive that you are not allowed to improvise or workaround on tactical levels IT, and the IT department put every possible measure into the software to enforce this policy ...

      The last thing you'd want in a war is to forbid improvisation.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:The Essence of Military is Privateering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, obviously I had problem translating my thoughts into English. Improvisations I referred to were not all improvisations, like the one you described, where one of the crew is about to hack the weapon system on site (therefore, you can assure he is one of you), but improvisations in procedures over the communications link, where the person on the other side needs to trust you are who you say you are. In such situations, where trust is needed, were there could be something conspicuous going on, you should be forced to contact specialists who are trained to recognize and counter social engineering. All other communications ("normal", predicted situations) should be handled over limited channels which allow no chitchat.

  23. Heil? What's wrong with this taggers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with you guys? Looking at tags for many articles I am starting to think that this tagging system really doesn't work.

  24. Re:That's great and all, but... by Petrushka · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... it would be nice if you could post a link to a full article in English, what with this being an english site and all. No, babelfish doesn't count.

    Yes, we should ignore all foreign articles until they've been officially translated, ...

    And it's not as if this is specifically an English-language site anyway, is it? I mean, look at the URL -- ".org". Not ".us", ".uk", ".au" or anything nation- or language- specific. The URL clearly indicates that it's supposed to be a pan-national site.

    (Yes, I know what the FAQ says. The URL sends a stronger and more direct message than the FAQ, however.)

  25. Re:That's great and all, but... by Faylone · · Score: 4, Informative

    bundeswehr (who are they? why do I care?)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundeswehr In short, the German army/navy/air force/etc.

  26. Re:Sorry, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah you really want a gnome. Gnomes get the engineering racial.

  27. Manually translated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Bundeswehr is reportedly assembling a "Cyberwar-Unit", which additionally to protecting the armed forces' IT infrastructure from attacks, is also supposed to scout and manipulate other computers or "adversarial networks". According to information available to the news magazine "Der Spiegel" the troupe consists of several dozen alumni of the universities of the Bundeswehr in computer-sciences and are stationed in Rheinbach near Bonn.

    The "Hackers-in-Uniform", as the Hamburg-based news magazine ["Der Spiegel"] called them, are currently in training and the troupe will be reportedly fully operational the next year. The strictly classified unit is subordinate to the Kommando Strategische Aufklaerung (Strategical Reconnaissance Command) under command of brigadier Friedrich Wilhelm Kriesel

    The Bundeswehr has issued no statement to the report. According to the Grundgesetz [German constitution], the German self-defence forces are prohibited from assuming interior tasks. There are, however, plans to abolish this ban.

    While experts are arguing world-wide, whether the term cyber-war is actually correct, as there are no casualties, there seem to be a consensus, that the defence of such threats is one of the task of the armed forces of a country.
    Regardless, whether in retrospect the cyber-attack on Estland is counted as a war, or not, every nation, which has a substantial IT-infrastructure, is taking the potential threat of cyber-attacks seriously.

    All links are leading to German pages. No guarantees on the accuracy of the translation, especially the military terms.

    1. Re:Manually translated by QuantumPete · · Score: 1

      Replace "troupe" with "unit" or "troop", though given the number of graduates the unit would more likely be company strength. Also, I'd replace "subordinate to" with "attached to" or "part of". And it's Brigadier General ;) QuantumPete

      --
      QuantumPete
  28. Beer company wants hackers? by syousef · · Score: 1

    German Bundeswehr's idea of recruiting hackers in order to 'penetrate, manipulate and damage

    You get the 'penetrate, manipulate and damage' with Budweiser or any beer, but why hackers only? Carnage for all I say!

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  29. Re:That's great and all, but... by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

    Great, now why wasn't any of this information in the story? :)

  30. Wait what? by meist3r · · Score: 1

    The constitutional safeguards still work? How exactly would the limits on the actions of the Bundeswehr be any different from the secret "Federal trojan" and other unauthorized methods which have been employed without constitutional authorization? Safeguards are a nice concept but you need people that are actually afraid of getting caught in them.

    1. Re:Wait what? by Moraelin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly when has the "Bundestrojaner" been actually used without authorization? No, seriously, I'm curious now.

      And how's it any worse than, say, the USA? You can find plenty of cases where the FBI planted a trojan or a keylogger on a _suspect's_ computer, which is all that the "Bundestrojaner" is supposed to do. The difference is that in Germany there has been a whole debate about it and it's been shot down on constitutional and privacy grounds repeatedly, while in the USA nobody even bothered wondering much about it.

      Let me repeat: the "Bundestrojaner" is supposed to only be used with a court mandate, only for a limited time, and only on the computers of people suspected of terror activities and the like. Plus a court is supposed to establish (as per the german supreme court decision) that the use does not pose any danger to a person's other rights, among which their freedom. It'll be interesting to see if they can use it at all then, but at any rate you can't use it, say, to intimidate your opponents.

      But seriously, how's that any worse than what the rest of the world already does? It seems to me like the USA just shipped such suspects to Gitmo for some waterboarding. I'll take a court-approved keylogger instead if I'm ever suspected of anything, thank you very much.

      And then you have cases like the NSA spying on its citizens without any court approval or legal mandate.

      Basically if you think that a law which sets clear limits is actually worse than no law, well, you're naive.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    2. Re:Wait what? by meist3r · · Score: 1

      So just because the press hasn't reported on it and the authorities deny it's existence no government agency has ever used illegal wiretaps or spy software to gather information. And you call me naive?

      The Bundeswehr Tornado Bomber is usually only used with a mandate as well and yet these things flew recon missions during the G8 summit. So what? Let's just agree that this kind of publicly funded technology isn't always used according to it's dedicated purpose.

      It's not any worse than in other countries but you claimed that "at least the safeguards are still in place" not really a soothing fact that we actually need to employ these safeguards to keep our politicians from abusing this power. Then again that is waht politics is.

      It doesn't have to be worse "not any better" isn't too re-assuring either. Germany tolerated and supported the illegal detention of suspected terrorists. Aren't you aware of that? At least the name Kurnaz should mean something to you. Our foreign affairs minister Steinmeier still denies that he ever knew of that, yet, when a German citizen is captured and taken hostage in some mountainous tourist region he's the first on TV to talk about their negotiations. Do you actually believe that the US doesn't tell us about stuff like that? Why else do you think they keep calling us an "important partner".

      You're trying to justify illegal means of intelligence gathering by giving me illegal rendition as a comparison? Sorry but you're out of your mind. Both are unacceptable in a free and democratic society. According to your definition all the real bad guys we catch with these illegal measures make up for all the innocent "Beifang" that we reel in. Since we strive to maintain both a democracy and freedom there is no way I can agree with you on this. This is the hard thing about freedom. You have to grant these rights to anybody even those that you suspect of being criminals, at least until you can definitely prove that they are guilty. It's called a Rechtsstaat.

      Basically if you think a law keeps people from doing certain things you are way more naive then I am. What happens when such a law governing intelligence gathering or treatment of suspects is broken? Who ever made the government take responsibility? When the Bundesverfassungsgericht stops some legal act they don't stop the agencies from doing their word. They simply refuse to give permission. The innocent victims are usually released and awarded a symbolic reparation by a court. That doesn't repair the harm done (lost jobs/spouses/friends), that doesn't keep the feds from breaking the law again, it doesn't take away the nagging doubt, insecurity and paranoia these people have to live through. What will Andrej Holm get for his troubles? What will the government learn from their erroneous behavior? In both cases the answer is "not very much". Simply because our country hasn't deteriorated into the mess that many other governments have become after 9/11 doesn't mean we're better. Apparently the people here simply take greater care in actually securing the freedoms that the US for example fought so hard to give us.

    3. Re:Wait what? by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      So basically you're proposing that the civil servants in Germany are so much better than those in the USA, that they can actually keep something like that a secret if it actually happened?

      At any rate, you're asking me to believe... what? That something happened although you have absolutely no evidence, nor even wild claims of it?

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    4. Re:Wait what? by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      The "Federal Trojan" is a political troll.

      What the whole debate revealed was that the inner security agencies were apparently unable so far to hack computers to get information.

    5. Re:Wait what? by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      I didn't hear Andrej Holm complain except that his wife made a agitprop case of it.

    6. Re:Wait what? by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      German Beamtenschaft is actually a technocratic class of its own. They are not just employees of the government.

      The funny thing in the US is that people really do hate administration and still they have fat administration, their federalism is a mess, etc.

      "So basically you're proposing that the civil servants in Germany are so much better than those in the USA, that they can actually keep something like that a secret if it actually happened?"

      Yes, but they possibly wouldn't do it in the first place.

    7. Re:Wait what? by meist3r · · Score: 1

      I didn't hear Andrej Holm complain except that his wife made a agitprop case of it.

      Excuse me, the last thing you do if two words you've used in a scientific paper brought you constant surveillance and months of imprisonment is to give the people who still think you are a terrorist any reason to want so "silence" you even more. I would guess he keeps back with that because every word he says in his own defence would be interpreted as a terrorists denial.

    8. Re:Wait what? by meist3r · · Score: 1

      I will assume that you are able to read German:

      http://www.searchsecurity.de/themenbereiche/bedrohungen/viren-wuermer-trojaner/articles/107236

      http://octo.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/sammelsurium-der-grausamkeiten-aus-allen-lander-polizeigesetzen/

      http://octo.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/bundesregierung-legt-einsatz-von-trojanern-beim-voip-abhoren-nahe/

      These are just a few that I found quickly Scroogling for it. Please excuse my lack of diversity in sources but I don't have that much time and you can find follow up literature through those on your own, I guess. I can't access my bookmarks from here so I couldn't give you the best but this should make my point just fine. As you might notice these are from two years ago, looong before any public discussion about the rightfulness of other means was even introduced. There was no legal basis for this mode of operation but it's a reality. This to me is enough proof that a lawful definition of "federal spyware" wasn't needed and is merely symbolic policy. Like I said, the people who are innocently subjected to these measures are seldomly reimbursed for their damages and in many cases of clandestine "Hausdurchsuchungen" not even notified.

      Some of the things here come from official agency papers that suggest these measures in investigations (without any legal basis I might add). Especially the Skype "Quellen-TKÃoe" surveillance is characteristically done via clandestine software which is introduced into the users system. This is been done, there are documents which exemplify specific pricing ranges therefore, I believe, it can safely be assumed that this is not merely a theoretical possibility.

      Sorry I didn't link to the file with the VoIP prices mentioned but I can't find the link at this moment. And yes, compared to the American system German bureaucracy has always been superior especially in terms of secrecy. There are gaps and mishaps everywhere but in Germany we also don't have this common "virtue" of wanting to blow the whistle. As you might know large parts of German history are coined by secret organizations and people that protect or ignore these proceedings because they are too afraid. Americans, strangely, seem to have a different approach and whistleblowers "sacrifice" their own good for justices sake more freely than here. This at least is my observation.

    9. Re:Wait what? by ZerzaDha · · Score: 0

      Let me repeat: the "Bundestrojaner" is supposed to only be used with a court mandate, only for a limited time, and only on the computers of people suspected of terror activities and the like. Plus a court is supposed to establish (as per the german supreme court decision) that the use does not pose any danger to a person's other rights, among which their freedom. It'll be interesting to see if they can use it at all then, but at any rate you can't use it, say, to intimidate your opponents.

      In theory that's all fine and dandy. The problem however is that judges are giving court mandates left and right. Just look at the way home searches, for which you need a court mandate too, are handled today. These are supposed only to be used in cases of serious crimes. And yet in practice you have a metric shitload of unconstitutional searches every year. You can get your home searched for like 20 Euro. The court mandate's become a laugh, nice words on paper, nothing more. There's no reason to believe it will be different for those electronic searches, which in the future will be even easier and with less hassle to do than those physical searches.

      Also "Fruit of the poisonous tree" doesn't work in Germany. Even if you get searched unconstitunional, possible evidence is still vaild. Even chance discovery of evidence they didn't originally come for can be used to make a case.

    10. Re:Wait what? by he-sk · · Score: 1

      The law does state clear limits on the usage of the Bundestrojaner, but those don't mean squat if the courts just rubber stamp requests from law enforcement.

      Which is exactly what is happening with phone wiretaps in Germany right now. A court request for a phone wiretap is basically a simple form with a line that says "check here to authorize" and that's it.

      Unsurprisingly, Germany is the country with the most wiretaps per capita in the EU by a very large margin.

      In fairness, I should add that the requirements are more stringent in theory in that the judge has to argue in writing why the Bundestrojaner is required in a case. (The CCC calls it "Richtervorbehalt 2.0".) But it remains it be seen if that has any practical effect and personally I am skeptical given the current political climate.

      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
    11. Re:Wait what? by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      I would not buy into that propaganda.

      He is no simple scientist.

    12. Re:Wait what? by meist3r · · Score: 1

      I would not buy into that propaganda.

      He is no simple scientist.

      And even if he is a left-wing activist so what? The accusations made against him and the other alleged members of the "mg - Militante Gruppe" were arson charges on vehicles. That justifies total surveillance and remand even though there is no apparent connection between the alleged arson and him? At least that is what is communicated about the case. You don't hear much from the government side of things, they're probably too embarrassed to even admit to the proceedings. I, for one, have never heard an official explanations for the things I keep hearing. If there was no such thing, why not prove it? Or at least deny it? They don't. Usually that is already more than you'd get from the feds. In most cases they deny anything until there is proof. This time there is a plethora of accounts and evidence and they don't deny. Usually that means they've been caught but can't admit to it because that would weaken their position.

      Maybe it's a clever political move by some witty left-wind terrorists that just tell us these stories about their kids being watched and about their gear being spied on to prepare for the downfall of the government. Yeah, that must be it.

      Gentrifikation, Praekarisierung ... there, I said it.

  31. Re:That's great and all, but... by SchwarzeReiter · · Score: 1

    ... it would be nice if you could post a link to a full article in English, what with this being an english site and all. No, babelfish doesn't count.

    Can't read the German one? Bad luck, Bro.

  32. Re:That's great and all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1) Because it's common knowledge 2) If you didn't know, I've been told that idiots commonly use www.google.com to bolster their grasp of simple facts

  33. I wouldn't buy a parser from you by Dr.+Hok · · Score: 5, Funny

    So I'm not the only one who read that as Budweiser!

    Incidentally Hacker is a brewery.

    --
    Say out loud: I'm an Aspie and I'm somewhat proud, I guess. Uh. Can I write an email in all caps instead? Hm...
  34. English version of article. by Dj · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.heise-online.co.uk/news/Report-claims-German-armed-forces-setting-up-cyberwar-unit--/112595

    --
    "You know you want me baby!" - Crow T Robot
  35. Re:That's great and all, but... by Tellarin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And .us would also not mean English-language as the the US has no official language.
    And Hawaiian is an official language in the state of Hawaii.

  36. Re:That's great and all, but... by Niedi · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'll give it a shot. The page this article is from (heise.de) is probably the closest to a german ./ there is. The original article that is referred to in this text was published in the Spiegel (Translation: mirror), a well-known german magazine.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Der_Spiegel

    The Bundeswehr is said to set up a "Cyberwar unit", which won't only protect the (army's or Germany's, not explicitly stated) own IT-infrastructure but is also supposed to carry out reconnaissance or manipulation "in opposing networks".
    According to information of the Spiegel, the troup is made out of a few dozen computer science alumni of the Bundeswehr's universities.
    According to the Hamburg-based news magazine the "hackers in uniform" are still in training at the moment but should be fully ready next year.
    The top secret (har har) unit is supposedly under the command of the "Kommando Strategische AufklÃrung" (like they said in the ./ article) and is led by the Brigade General (whatever rank that is)Friedrich Wilhelm Kriesel. There haven't been any comments from the Bundeswehr regarding this report. According to the Basic Constitutional Law the German army is not allowed to carry out any functions/missions in the inland (meant is that they may not carry out police or secret service work, etc.... within germany) but there have been plans to abolish that restriction for quite some time.
    While experts are still debating wether a term like Cyberwar is correct since there are neither killings nor injuries in such a war, there seems to be an agreement that the defense against such threats should be one of the duties of a nation's army. And even if the Cyberattack on Estland wasn't termed a "War" afterwards it's true that every state that runs a substantial IT-infrastructure is taking potential threats of cyberattacks seriously.

    Americans mangling up random german words never fail to amuse me ;)

  37. Re:That's great and all, but... by Jens+Egon · · Score: 1

    (Yes, I know what the FAQ says. The URL sends a stronger and more direct message than the FAQ, however.)

    It's not as if 'US-centric' necessarily means English only. Other languages are spoken there.

  38. Re:That's great and all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vieleicht solltest Du auch erst einmal deutsch lernen ...

    Why does /. abound with pretentious twerps?

  39. Re:That's great and all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod parent up, puhleeze! This is a prizeworthy contribution - I'm sure Chaplin, never mind the Pythons, would approve - and so rare on /. these days.

  40. Look at the bottom of the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about http://www.heise-online.co.uk/news/Report-claims-German-armed-forces-setting-up-cyberwar-unit--/112595 ?

  41. Translation (by native speaker) by molecular · · Score: 1

    The "Bundeswehr" (german military arm) is currently in the process of building a "cyberwar unit", which does not only protect it's own infrastructure from attacks, but also conducts reconnaissance and manipulation operations on foreign computers, respectively in foreign networks. According to information from "der Spiegel" (a german weekly newspaper), the unit consists of a couple of dozen computer science degree holders barracked in Rheinbach close to Bonn. Currently the "hackers in uniform" are still training, bound to be operational not before next year.

    Organisatorily the top secret unit is part of "strategic reconnaissance" and is lead by brigade general Friedrich Wilhelm Kriesel. No comment on the report was to be had from the Bundeswehr as yet. According to the constitution, the "german defense army" is not allowed to conduct tasks within the country, although there have been plans to remove this prohibition for some time.

    While experts are debating worldwide wether such a term as "cyberwar" is correct or not, because in such a war there are no dead or wounded, there seems to be agreement that defending such threats is the duty of the armed forces of a country. Even if the cyberattack on estonia cannot be said to have been a war in retrospect, every nation that runs any substantial electronic IT-infrastructure takes potential threats by cyperattacks seriously. (pem/telepolis)

  42. Re:That's great and all, but... by Fred_A · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, we should ignore all foreign articles until they've been officially translated, even tho' translation tools are adequate to give you the gist of an article

    Quite. After all this being the Internet, it's not like it interconnects any networks all over the planet, or if /. had been around for any amount of time and had drawn English speaking people from all kinds of places.

    So let's stick to articles from the US or (very occasionally) Air Strip 1. After all all other people must hate freedom as shown by their willingness of living outside of the US (and speaking funny languages with weird characters that aren't even proper ASCII).

    I mean - it's not like there's any Germans who read Slashdot & will translate in the comments or anything is it?

    Now that's just crazy talk.

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  43. Re:That's great and all, but... by mcvos · · Score: 3, Funny

    Vieleicht solltest Du auch erst einmal deutsch lernen ...

    Are we going to get faulty spelling flames in German now?

  44. Re:That's great and all, but... by nutshell42 · · Score: 1

    No?

    Yes.

    --
    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
  45. Re:FIRST?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it, you Window fan boi's are always late to the party, and then you keep trying to put Balmer's ugly ass in our face? In the Linux world, We prefer this over yours and Balmer's work.

  46. this doesn't bode well for freelancers by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    the best hackers are still freelancers. Is hacking going to become an act of war in the future?

    If that's the case, the freelancers are going to send us all back to the dark ages.

    They won't stand for cyber-terrorism by the world's armies.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
    1. Re:this doesn't bode well for freelancers by chrisG23 · · Score: 1

      the best hackers are still freelancers. Is hacking going to become an act of war in the future?

      It already is potentiallay an act of war. Countries (and by that I mean official government entities, not random groups of people that hack for fun and profit and are concentrated in a single government) do not overtly mess with other countries computer networks. Covertly (meaning unprovable/untraceable or requiring some diplomatic smoothing over if caught), yes.

      If that's the case, the freelancers are going to send us all back to the dark ages.

      It could happen, sure.

      They won't stand for cyber-terrorism by the world's armies.

      Because every individual with hacking skills subscribes to one set of morals, in every country and culture of the world. Right.

  47. Re:That's great and all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy screwed the translation seriously up, here is the correct one:

    The Bundeswehr is said to set up a "Beerwar unit", which won't only protect the (army's or Germany's, not explicitly stated) own brewing infrastructure but is also supposed to carry out reconnaissance or manipulation "in opposing beerworks".
    According to information of the Spiegel, the troup is made out of a few dozen brewing science alumni of the Bundeswehr's universities.
    According to the Hamburg-based news magazine the "brewers in uniform" are still in training at the moment but should be fully ready next year.
    The top secret unit is supposedly under the command of the "Kommando Strategische AufklÃfrung" and is led by the Brigade General Friedrich Wilhelm Kriesel. There haven't been any comments from the Bundeswehr regarding this report. According to the Basic Constitutional Law the German army is not allowed to carry out any functions/missions in the inland (meant is that they may not carry out police or secret service work, brewing, Hax'n roasting etc.... within germany) but there have been plans to abolish that restriction for quite some time.
    While experts are still debating wether a term like "Beerwar" is correct since there are neither killings nor injuries in such a war, there seems to be an agreement that the defense against such threats should be one of the duties of a nation's army. And even if the beerattack on Estland wasn't termed a "War" afterwards it's true that every state that runs a substantial brewing infrastructure is taking potential threats of beer attacks seriously.

  48. Re:That's great and all, but... by couchslug · · Score: 1

    "This being slashdot and all, nobody would actually read the article anyway."

    It's easier, in this case, to just wait for Godwin to show up.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  49. Re:That's great and all, but... by jguevin · · Score: 1

    Yes, yes, we all should google things we don't know. But it's not really common knowledge--I just asked 5 intelligent, educated people, and none of them had any idea. But hey, now you can feel even more superior!

    And was there really any reason not to say "German military"?

  50. Re:That's great and all, but... by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

    What do you call someone who speaks three languages?
    Trilingual.

    What do you call someone who speaks two languages?
    Bilingual.

    What do you call someone who speaks one language?
    American.

    --
    'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  51. Re:That's great and all, but... by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

    Bundeswehr is an established word which describes German armed forces. It is used in many languages not only german. And this word is in Oxford dictionary too.
    It is similar to Sputnik, for example. Not that uncommon for any language to use foreigh words, you now...

  52. Where do I sign? by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

    Ok, I can crack a WEP network in under 30 minutes, does that make me qualified?

    If you get your own "Das Keyboard" in the Bundeswehr -- I'm all for it.

    1. Re:Where do I sign? by the_other_chewey · · Score: 1

      Ok, I can crack a WEP network in under 30 minutes, does that make me qualified?

      No. Everything above 5 minutes - on weak netbook hardware - proves that you are not. ;-)

  53. I want to become a "government hacker" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, do you know if any government hires new grads or security professional from foreign countries? Usually you need to be a citizen of that country and have Top Secret security clearances, but do I have anyway some hope (in Italy there isn't anything like this, yet, and besides this I don't want to work in Italy)?
    You can contact me at billsmith@mailvault.com

  54. Re:That's great and all, but... by mattr · · Score: 1

    mod grandpappy up puhleeeeeezzzzee!

  55. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The German Bundeswehr hacker regiment has just taken over all the servers of the French Armée de Terre.

  56. And what about police, WTU, Interpol? by Max_W · · Score: 1
    I think the task of policing the network is of, well, the police, Interpol, UN WTU world telecommunication union, but not by a small secret army unit.

    We do need a protection of our websites and services, but not by a small secret army unit.

    What we need is training the civil police in every country, in every city, in every village all over the world to take care of vandals, extortionists, etc. by an organized international effort. With the participation of the programmers' community.

    Instead they invented the wheel again, a small isolated secret unit. Instead of the global work, which is indeed to be done, they do nothing and cover it up by a pseudo-news.

  57. Re:That's great and all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This being slashdot and all, nobody would actually read the article anyway."

    It's easier, in this case, to just wait for Godwin to show up.

    You people are a bunch of fucking Troll Nazis! Worse than Hitler! Feed me! I eat Godwins for lunch!

  58. Re:That's great and all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vieleicht solltest Du auch erst einmal deutsch lernen ...

    "Vielleicht" has two ls

    Pot, meet kettle.

  59. Re:That's great and all, but... by oreaq · · Score: 0, Troll

    A German spelling Nazi. What an unexpected development.

  60. Re:That's great and all, but... by tchall · · Score: 1

    You could always read the English version in the UK edition... http://www.heise-online.co.uk/news/Report-claims-German-armed-forces-setting-up-cyberwar-unit--/112595 It's a pretty good translation

  61. Re:That's great and all, but... by dreamsofcaffeine · · Score: 1

    Sollte wohl niemanden ueberraschen, da man ja nach ``de Joden'' zu einem neuen Feind gehen muss. :-)