Slashdot Mirror


Hadron Collider Relaunch Delayed

SpuriousLogic writes "There's been another delay in the schedule announced for getting the Large Hadron Collider switched back on — now it's September 2009, a year after it shut down due to a malfunction. Scientists had said they expected the $5.4B machine to be repaired by November 2008, but then pushed the date back to June 2009, before the latest delay."

27 of 223 comments (clear)

  1. Incredible by StupiderThanYou · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was only on a few days, and already they've achieved time travel.

    1. Re:Incredible by saintm · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've never seen one before - no one has - but I'm guessing it's a white hole.

    2. Re:Incredible by hikaricore · · Score: 1, Funny

      I've never seen one before - no one has - but I'm guessing it's a white hole.

    3. Re:Incredible by daniel_newby · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heavy? What is this obsession with mass?

    4. Re:Incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Is there something wrong with the Earth's gravitational pull in the future?

    5. Re:Incredible by Aceticon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually traveling to the future is extremely easy.

      The hard part is getting there faster than one second a second.

  2. Fast! by bablefisk · · Score: 5, Funny

    November 2007 was a bit optimistic, but september 2008 is still a really fast fix!

  3. That's more than just a typo... by Arancaytar · · Score: 4, Funny

    That entire news item is outdated. :P

  4. 2012 is fast approaching by VMaN · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have a sneaking suspicion the repairs won't be done till 2012... :| Making the prophecy come true after all.

    1. Re:2012 is fast approaching by aliquis · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mark my words, 2009 will be the year of atleast one prophecy!

  5. Re:NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    September 2008? Its 2009 you fucking idiots.

    No, the Large Hadron Collider already provoke a Time-Space anomaly.

  6. Re:NO by harry666t · · Score: 4, Funny

    > by November 2007, but then pushed the date back to June 2008

    They're living backwards in time, dude. They think that the year of Linux on the Desktop was^H^H^Hwill be 1972.

  7. Re:NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm really slipping, I wrote 1908 on a check today, instead of 1909.

  8. He said fucking idiots, so not modded up? by Alarindris · · Score: 2, Funny

    You fucking idiots, that's a blatant and stupid error in the summary, give this guy some love.

  9. Re:NO by mcfatboy93 · · Score: 3, Funny

    stop yelling at them... I still mess up the whole 2008/2009 thing.Its only febuary

    --
    Its not my fault, someone put a wall in my way.
  10. Re:Confusion about Dates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's not like anything happened in 2009BC. Well, not in Geneva

    As a resident, I can assure you that unless you have very deep pockets or actually work for CERN (and even then...), nothing happens here anyway. It's the Indianapolis of Europe.

  11. Analysis from the Washington Post by wiredog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here:

    'CERN* management today confirmed the restart schedule [translation: announced another delay] for the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) resulting from the recommendations from last week's Chamonix workshop. The new schedule foresees [not that you'd want to bet your life on it] first beams in the LHC at the end of September this year, with collisions following in late October. A short technical stop has also been foreseen over the Christmas period. The LHC will then run through to autumn next year, ensuring that the experiments have adequate data to carry out their first new physics analyses and have results to announce in 2010. The new schedule also permits the possible collisions of lead ions in 2010.

    'This new schedule represents a delay of six weeks with respect to the previous schedule, which foresaw the LHC "cold [sic?????] at the beginning of July". The cause of this delay is due to several factors such as implementation of a new enhanced protection system for the busbar and magnet splices; installation of new pressure-relief valves to reduce the collateral damage in case of a repeat [explosion] incident; application of more stringent safety constraints [no more drinking contests in the tunnel]; and scheduling constraints associated with helium transfer [because the scientists can't resist making their voices sound funny] and storage.'

  12. Launch?! by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm all for moving it to a less controversial, orbital location, but this feature creep is getting ridiculous.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  13. Re:NO by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

    September 2008? Its 2009 you fucking idiots.

    Please mind your language. What you meant to say was: "It's 2009 you fucking idiot." (singular). kdawson is indeed a fucking idiot; the other "editors" aren't necessarily fucking idiots by extension.

    I mean, they are, but we have to retain some sense of relative scale. They employ kdawson in much the same way that a bunch of plain girls always take a really fat, ugly one out with them to make them look better by comparison.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  14. Mod parent up by kdawson+(3715) · · Score: 5, Funny

    This one made me laugh. Honestly.

    Listen pal, it ain't as easy as you would think to do things as they are done here. You people keep whining about us not reviewing the submissions before they come in, and so we finally get around to doing it, and you troll about it. So what if it took five months to review the submission? That's a LOT better than not reviewing it at all, right?

    Sheesh!

    1. Re:Mod parent up by dotancohen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps you could elaborate? Many of us do difficult jobs and still know what year it is.

      See that big shiny thing outside your window that keeps track of days and months and years? People in their parent's basement don't have that luxury.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    2. Re:Mod parent up by Legion_SB · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think they should both be sacked, just to be sure.

      ... despite poor economy.

      --
      'a';DROP TABLE users; SELECT * FROM DATA WHERE name LIKE '%'... if you're reading this, it didn't work.
  15. Re:NO by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, the Large Hadron Collider already provoke a Time-Space anomaly.

    So that's what John de Lancie has been up to since Stargate SG-1 ended. I always knew the human race would be judged for our barbarism.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  16. One extra year... by wvmarle · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...for us to live until the earth is swallowed by a black hole that accidentally did not collapse.

    I have stopped paying my life insurance already because in a year I may be dead but there will also be no-one left behind to pay out the policy.

    Or to receive it for that matter.

  17. Obligatory Simpsons Quote by denvergeek · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Lousy Smarch weather..."

  18. Re:NO by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, the Large Hadron Collider already provoke a Time-Space anomaly.

    A guy walked into the Chicago campus where the particle accelerator sits in December, 2001 and proclaimed he was from the future. "I'm here to warn you, we built a device called the Large Hadron Collider that's bigger than the one in Chicago. When we turned it on it momentarily generated a black hole and a spacetime anomoly, and I got caught in the anomoly. I have to give you some details to prevent the error."

    The fellow says "That's interesting but it's hard to believe. How could I tell you're from the future? What's going to happen in the next few years?"

    "Well, the next President will be a black man who went to a Muslim school as a child, and and his middle name is Hussein. In 2008 we'll not only still be at war in Afghanistan, but we'll be at war in Iraq too."

    "Look buddy, I can almost swallow that time travel stuff but the rest of it is unbelievable bullshit."

    ---

    (Not original, but I can't remember where I heard it.)

  19. Re:NO by jscalbny · · Score: 2, Funny

    They think that the year of Linux on the Desktop was^H^H^Hwill be 1972

    Yes, but how would that properly be expressed in the Future Semi-Conditionally Modified Subinverted Plagal Past Subjunctive Intentional form?

    .