Slashdot Mirror


1,234,567,890 Seconds Since Unix Time Began

os2man was one of many readers to let us know that later on today, at 23:31:30 UTC (30 seconds after this story went live), the number of seconds since January 1st 1970 will be exactly 1234567890. January 1st, 1970 marks the start of the clock for the Unix operating system and many other operating systems. Here is a list of celebrations of the moment around the world.

187 comments

  1. FIRST by Mogget03 · · Score: 5, Funny

    first post of newepoch!

    1. Re:FIRST by __NR_kill · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:FIRST by Phusion0 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I didn't hear any gun shots or fireworks-- what gives?

      --
      Smokedot.org
    3. Re:FIRST by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      Really? I saw fireworks.

    4. Re:FIRST by lobiusmoop · · Score: 1

      So did I, while on the ##1234567890 channel, good clean geeky fun.

      --
      "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    5. Re:FIRST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um, the epoch hasn't changed.

    6. Re:FIRST by icebraining · · Score: 1

      good clean geeky spamming fun :P

    7. Re:FIRST by eln · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Really? I heard lots of gunshots. Come to think of it, I heard lots of gunshots last night too. Now I hear sirens.

      Maybe I need to move to a better neighborhood.

    8. Re:FIRST by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

      technically it's a dupe.
      http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/08/2043206

      Why do you hate us? Can't you just let us have our fun?

      (although I guess you are technically correct, which, after all, is the best kind of correct).

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    9. Re:FIRST by rts008 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Nah,man... just chill out dude.

      The gunshots you hear, you need not fear.

      Beware that outlier you don't hear that's here! - Burma Shave.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  2. Woo hoo! by Eternal+Vigilance · · Score: 3, Funny

    Happy 1234567890, everyone!

    1. Re:Woo hoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With deep regret, I must inform you that the 1234567890GET on 4chan has miserably failed.
      Closest contestant : http://img.4chan.org/b/res/116943628.html

    2. Re:Woo hoo! by Niris · · Score: 1

      You broke rule #1 and #2 *glare* granted... this is /.

    3. Re:Woo hoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Rules were made up by newfags.

    4. Re:Woo hoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, and it's friday the 1234567890th as well!

    5. Re:Woo hoo! by commandZ · · Score: 1

      Thanks Unix for spawning Linux and OS X....

  3. nth post by necrognome · · Score: 1

    Congratulations!? :D

    --


    Let's get drunk and delete production data!
  4. should we collect screenshots now? by daniel23 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    dp@tui:~$ perl -e 'print time(),"\n";'
    1234567890

    --
    605413? Yes, it's a prime.
    1. Re:should we collect screenshots now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer(ed):

      while true; do date "+%s"; sleep 1; done

    2. Re:should we collect screenshots now? by SIR_Taco · · Score: 1

      1234568297
      damn it I missed it!

      --
      I say don't drink and drive, you might spill your drink. Before you get behind the wheel just stop and think.
    3. Re:should we collect screenshots now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just `watch -n1 'date +%s'`?

    4. Re:should we collect screenshots now? by quangdog · · Score: 1

      Or, from the manpage for date we find this smoldering slagheap: date -j -f "%a %b %d %T %Z %Y" "`date`" "+%s"

    5. Re:should we collect screenshots now? by Bandman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My screenshot

      I used 'watch -n'

    6. Re:should we collect screenshots now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are people using perl for this?
      date +%s
      Much more simple.

      Whores.

    7. Re:should we collect screenshots now? by sjborch · · Score: 1

      dp@tui:~$ perl -e 'print time(),"\n";' 1234567890

      Thanks! My first perl script and I owe it all to you!

    8. Re:should we collect screenshots now? by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 1
      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
  5. zomg zomg let's party like it was 1111111111 !1!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    n/t

  6. Yay! by stygianguest · · Score: 1

    Happy 1234567890-day!

  7. Can't be good by nizo · · Score: 3, Funny

    First I find out today is Friday the 13th and now this. I'm surprised today isn't some cult's doomsday.

    1. Re:Can't be good by SIR_Taco · · Score: 5, Funny

      Doomsday?! No way man, we're celebrating with some blue kool-aid! It's the only way to

      --
      I say don't drink and drive, you might spill your drink. Before you get behind the wheel just stop and think.
  8. Exactly 1234567890 seconds? by aj50 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At 23:31:30 UTC, the number of seconds since January 1st 1970 will be exactly 1234567890.

    Except it won't because unix time doesn't account for leap seconds

    --
    I wish to remain anomalous
    1. Re:Exactly 1234567890 seconds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      +1, pedant.

    2. Re:Exactly 1234567890 seconds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not accounting for leap seconds is exactly why it will be.

    3. Re:Exactly 1234567890 seconds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The correct information was modded -1 the last time this topic came up, and the wrong information was perceived as +5 informative by the mods.

    4. Re:Exactly 1234567890 seconds? by qubicpotato · · Score: 1

      I was wondering who sits and works this stuff out but, someone actually considers leap seconds and I realise my first thought was irrelevant!

    5. Re:Exactly 1234567890 seconds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are 24 more seconds than 1234567890 between 1970-01-01, 00:00:00 UTC and 2009-02-13, 23:31:30 UTC. According to the POSIX standard, Unix time counts exactly 60 seconds per minute, 60 minutes per hour, and 24 hours per day. UTC is a timescale which is kept in sync with the slightly unpredictable motion of this planet. To that effect, 24 so-called leap seconds have been added to the last minute of 24 years since the inception of UTC. In Unix time, a leap second and the following second have the same time_t value, so they're effectively counted as one second.

    6. Re:Exactly 1234567890 seconds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And my (admittedly sarcastic) reply explaining why the +5 post was bullshit scored 0.

      Which is exactly why you shouldn't trust Wikipedia. The truth is not a popularity contest.

    7. Re:Exactly 1234567890 seconds? by againjj · · Score: 4, Informative

      The average person does not understand the difference between UTC and UT1. That is why Unix does not account for leap seconds. UTC uses SI seconds. Unix uses the rubber seconds that the average person understands. So, the correct statement is "At 23:31:30 UT1, the number of seconds since January 1st 1970 will be exactly 1234567890."

      Besides, it doesn't matter anyway, since this is simply for fun (and part of the fun is annoying pedants).

    8. Re:Exactly 1234567890 seconds? by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

      At 23:31:30 UTC, the number of seconds since January 1st 1970 will be exactly 1234567890.

      Except it won't because unix time doesn't account for leap seconds

      See here!

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    9. Re:Exactly 1234567890 seconds? by rts008 · · Score: 1

      +2, pedant

      Don't forget to add 'up' * the effect.

      *keep adding to +*, pedant to P,GP,GGP, and OP posts- pass it up!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    10. Re:Exactly 1234567890 seconds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it doesn't, which is exactly why that statement is *true*.

    11. Re:Exactly 1234567890 seconds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Neither do you understand the difference. The difference between UTC1 and UTC is less than 1 sec, so it cannot explain the 24 second difference.

      Want you really want to say is that you're counting mean solar seconds between 23:31:30 UTC (or UT1) and January 1st 1970.

    12. Re:Exactly 1234567890 seconds? by againjj · · Score: 1

      Neither do you understand the difference. The difference between UTC1 and UTC is less than 1 sec, so it cannot explain the 24 second difference.

      Want you really want to say is that you're counting mean solar seconds between 23:31:30 UTC (or UT1) and January 1st 1970.

      It's UT1, not UTC1. And they are kept in sync by adding seconds in UTC, since UT1 is mean solar time, counting mean solar seconds, and so the seconds in UT1 are longer than the seconds in UTC.

  9. Epoch win by VMaN · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Re:Epoch win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, har de har. Except your about the 15 000th person to link to that strip.

      Well done. Sheep.

    2. Re:Epoch win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yes. I am aware of the wrong "you're".

  10. What is everyone drinking? by Pathwalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've got 15 year old Laphoraig here.

    1. Re:What is everyone drinking? by jae471 · · Score: 1

      Jag bombs with all the other engineers. The countdown in the bar was quite funny.

    2. Re:What is everyone drinking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      30 day old PBR.

    3. Re:What is everyone drinking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coca-Cola. You feel free to kill your liver. I'm working on my pancreas.

    4. Re:What is everyone drinking? by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      Leffe Blond, Lefee Brune, Hoegaarden. It was on offer at the supermarket. What else is your average lonely computer nerd going to drink?

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    5. Re:What is everyone drinking? by isomeme · · Score: 4, Funny

      378,683,112 second old Glenfiddich for me.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    6. Re:What is everyone drinking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caffe' Mauro homemade cappuccino...

    7. Re:What is everyone drinking? by vyruss000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wasn't it actually more of a countup? :>

    8. Re:What is everyone drinking? by Device666 · · Score: 1

      Ardbeg The Lord Of The Isles 25 Yrs old But Laphroig 15 Yrs is also a winner. To be honest, no other whisky beats the peat of a neat Islay whisky.

    9. Re:What is everyone drinking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've just finished a surprisingly excellent bottle of Spar Rioja.

    10. Re:What is everyone drinking? by adolf · · Score: 1

      A dry Martini, with a big, fat, oil-soaked, blue-cheese stuffed olive at the end.

      That's what else.

    11. Re:What is everyone drinking? by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      Love your sig, man. Great album. What God wants, God gets, God help us all!

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    12. Re:What is everyone drinking? by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1
      May I beg to differ, and offer Talisker as a fine (and slightly better mannered) alternative?

      It's got the peat, but it's from Skye and is a little more subtle than either Ardbeg or Laphroaig (bigger island, so perhaps the influence of the sea is slightly less).

      But then I am Welsh, so inclined to perversity in my choice of beverage :)

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    13. Re:What is everyone drinking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even Better 568,080,000 second old Glenlivet.

    14. Re:What is everyone drinking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sturdy fermented Ecuadorean Pinoqachole. 58% Alcohol.
      The REAL stuff, not that cheap Mexican imitation.
      In Quito, we don't fool around.

    15. Re:What is everyone drinking? by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      I bought a 3 pack of Underberg and mixed them in a crystal goblet. No, really.

    16. Re:What is everyone drinking? by Tomfrh · · Score: 1

      Ardbeg whips Laphroaig.

    17. Re:What is everyone drinking? by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      La Chouffe of course, the best beer Belgium has to offer :)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  11. Timing == Everything by slimey_limey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't it a bit late to be posting the list of celebrations?

    1. Re:Timing == Everything by Dupple · · Score: 1

      Not if you were planning on going to the London celebration. That bar has to be one of the worst.

      --
      Watch those corners
  12. Wow by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 5, Funny

    Happy sequential Unix time day.

    I am spending it drinking alone on a Friday night and wishing I had a girlfriend. How are the rest of you guys celebrating?

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    1. Re:Wow by ed.mps · · Score: 3, Informative

      same here

      --
      !sig
    2. Re:Wow by Uthic · · Score: 1

      Same..well ok not drinking, but definitely the girlfriend part.

    3. Re:Wow by AaxelB · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'll also be wishing I had a girlfriend, but while drinking with other people. Most of whom are couples. Meh.

    4. Re:Wow by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I'm recovering from a stomach flu. My pregnant wife is watching TV while I work up the energy to play a video game to take my mind off the nausea. Tomorrow, assuming I'm recovered enough, we have a pregnancy class thing to go to...

      So not much celebrating here :(

    5. Re:Wow by fishthegeek · · Score: 1

      I'm married.... so BSG it is!

      --
      load "$",8,1
    6. Re:Wow by geekoid · · Score: 0, Troll

      I am spending it drinking alone on a Friday night

      I cant imagine why you don't ahve a girl friend.

      You want a girlfriend you need to be social and meet some. I mean, drink alone all you want, but don't complain about.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Wow by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 4, Funny

      I spend every Friday night like that

    8. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I am spending it drinking alone on a Friday night and wishing I had a girlfriend. How are the rest of you guys celebrating?

      I have a girlfriend, you insensitive clod!

    9. Re:Wow by Cerberus7 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm spending it drinking at home with my wife. Pretty much the same.

      Also, thanks to her, I didn't get to actually see the numbers change at coolepochcountdown.com. I mean, ffs, I've had this page open for over an hour, watching the time countdown, and you wait until 10 seconds before the pivotal moment to ask me to do something, causing me to look away ever so briefly and miss it? ARGH!

      --
      I don't know about you, but my servers run on the power of cotton candy and happy thoughts. -Anonymous Coward
    10. Re:Wow by miro+f · · Score: 1

      you think you have it bad? In Australia it's valentines day as well, just to rub salt into our wounds...

      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
    11. Re:Wow by Ren.Tamek · · Score: 2, Funny

      First date in years :). It's like the gods of unix (linus himself?) came down from the heavens and sorted it out for me.

      Or maybe I just asked her out when we were drunk, one of the two.

      --
      "If you want a vision of the future, Winston, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever." - George Orwell, 1984
    12. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm recovering from a stomach flu. My pregnant wife is watching TV while I work up the energy to play a video game to take my mind off the nausea. Tomorrow, assuming I'm recovered enough, we have a pregnancy class thing to go to...

      So not much celebrating here :(

      "Boo hoo hoo, I'm feeling a little nauseated." You've got a wife and child on the way; you're not going to get much sympathy here mister.

    13. Re:Wow by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Me, too. Just don't tell my wife!

      (Just kidding, sweetheart! ;)

    14. Re:Wow by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm fully aware that I'm doing little more than complaining. Everyone deserves to complain once in a while...

    15. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happy sequential Unix time day.

      I am spending it drinking alone on a Friday night and wishing I had a girlfriend. How are the rest of you guys celebrating?

      Same thing, except I can't drink because I don't process alcohol correctly.

      Fuck.

    16. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, spend your time wishing for something more productive.

    17. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spent it drinking, like you, on a Friday night. But with my wife in the next room. Wishing I were free again.

    18. Re:Wow by just_another_sean · · Score: 3, Funny

      Happy sequential Unix time day.

      I am spending it drinking alone on a Friday night and wishing I had a girlfriend. How are the rest of you guys celebrating?

      About the same. Oh, except my wife is asleep in the next room.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    19. Re:Wow by FrankieBaby1986 · · Score: 1

      Ditto, just got dumped on monday after 13 months.

      --
      ERROR: SIG NOT FOUND (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?:
    20. Re:Wow by greg_barton · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm spending it at home with my wife and 18 month old daughter, who we named after the first computer programmer, Ada.

      Hang in there, Mr Geek. Your time will come.

    21. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If she's already pregnant then what's the class for?

    22. Re:Wow by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      It's a "third trimester" class... stuff like how to recognize when it's time to go to the hospital (before it's too late, that is), they give a tour of the hospital so you know where to go, some other stuff.

    23. Re:Wow by RichardJenkins · · Score: 1

      I spent it with my girlfriend wishing I was drinking alone.

  13. Screen grab. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a little screen shot to mark the occasion.

    Happy 23:31:30 UTC everyone! (Oddly a 13th Friday!)

    1. Re:Screen grab. by joggle · · Score: 1

      Yea, happy 1234567890 everyone! Looking forward to the next one.

      Let's see, that would be 12345678900 or 12345678901 right? Hmm, that works out to 2361/3/21 19:15:00 UTC. Err, maybe not. Variables using 32 bits to store the epoch time would have blown up before then anyway.

    2. Re:Screen grab. by assert(0) · · Score: 1

      The next one will be 2147483648, THAT will be worth celebrating. Patterns in base ten are kinda lame anyway.

      --
      (founded 95,000,000 yrs ago, very space opera)
    3. Re:Screen grab. by joggle · · Score: 1

      Well, if nothing else at least a lot of us should still be alive to see that one (2038/1/19 03:14:08 UTC). That's always a plus in my book.

    4. Re:Screen grab. by Bandman · · Score: 1

      Cool. here's mine

    5. Re:Screen grab. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a little screen shot to mark the occasion.

      Obviously photoshopped.

    6. Re:Screen grab. by Alpha+Whisky · · Score: 1

      Someone mod the parent insightful.

      That is the biggie, I'll be retired by then, but that's when all the embedded equipment and old computer systems which store the date as a signed 32bit integer will go kablooey, it will make the millennium bug look like a picnic.

      --
      it's = it is

      its = belonging to it

  14. Thanks Unix! by HartDev · · Score: 1

    I am just really glad that there are some options as far as Operating Systems go, I am writing a paper about FOSS and how we can use it in education and how much money it will save, but most importantly, how fast technology can advance without being hindered by anti-competitive business practices.

    --
    To see a few of my Android apps goto: www.hartwired.com
  15. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Joss Whedons new series Dollhouse will start airing today. Will be friggin epoch :>

    1. Re:In other news... by rk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I figure Fox will cancel it after 13 episodes, just like they did to him last time. I used to think Joss was smart, but here he is, back with Fox, with a TV show with an interesting premise, and they've got him on Friday night again.

      If they do it to him again, I'll be disappointed, but I won't feel sorry for him this time.

    2. Re:In other news... by masterzora · · Score: 1

      I hope you're not using that as an excuse not to watch it! If you're not interested, that's one thing, but there are a lot of interested people that I've had to convince to actually watch it because they're afraid of it getting cancelled. Self-fulfilling prophecy, much? At least it looks like Fox is caring about this one, because they've done a pretty good amount of promotion for this, even if they did put it in the Friday night death slot. Here's to hoping!

      --
      Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
    3. Re:In other news... by rk · · Score: 1

      Oh, no, I tuned in. I am a member of the One True Church of Joss. I liked it. I didn't have that immediate "I'm in love with this show" that I did with Firefly, but it was definitely watchable and intend to keep watching it.

      I just hope he knows what he's doing... "fool me once" and all that. :-)

  16. Screen grab. by thesolo · · Score: 1

    Here's a little screen shot to mark the occasion.

    Happy 23:31:30 UTC everyone! (Oddly a 13th Friday!)

    (I swear I didn't check the AC box, weird.)

  17. Grumble... by AvoidTheNoid · · Score: 0

    I was hoping the nice Debian people would celebrate it by releasing Lenny. Grumble.

  18. Ummm... by SailorSpork · · Score: 0, Redundant
    1. Re:Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A post pointing out a dupe is modded redundant. The ironing is delicious.

  19. Next stop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next party is at Fri Jul 13 12:01:20 2012 (GMT) when UNIX time will hit 0x50000000.

    1. Re:Next stop. by mangu · · Score: 1

      And what will be the Unix time at December 21st, 2012 11:11 UTC?

    2. Re:Next stop. by e9th · · Score: 1

      Time to party like it's 12.19.17.19.19?

    3. Re:Next stop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $ date +%s --date="Dec 21 11:11:00 UTC 2012"
      1356088260

    4. Re:Next stop. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 0

      Well, Unix time is the number of seconds since the epoch, 1970-01-01 00:00:00. Like most people here, I figure you have a computer sitting in front of you, probably a calculator applet and at least one programming language installed, right?

      So why are you asking us? ;)

    5. Re:Next stop. by mangu · · Score: 1

      why are you asking us? ;)

      Who's asking anything?

    6. Re:Next stop. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      That's Bodging 101. Engineering 101 is almost, but not quite, completely unrelated.

      ~$ date -ud "December 21, 2012 11:11:30" +%s
      1356088290

      So, 1356088290 +/- 30(ish)

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    7. Re:Next stop. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      That was funny as hell? I see your point?

  20. FUCK YEAH by EvilBrak89 · · Score: 0

    Posting in a legendary discussion.

  21. Decimal bias? by Sybert42 · · Score: 1

    The binary milestones are more interesting. They might have actual implications.

  22. I missed it by ChienAndalu · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wrote a countdown script but then I got confused. Guess I have to wait for the 64-bit one :-(

    1. Re:I missed it by russlar · · Score: 1

      Guess I have to wait for the 64-bit one :-(

      Good luck with that.

      --
      Anybody want my mod points?
  23. Slow news day... by 278MorkandMindy · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...well expect for the fanboys..

    So I don't get "trolled"

    Imagine that many linux machines in a beowulf cluster!

  24. Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The google logo was changed for a few minutes to celebrate it, did anyone get a screenshot?

    1. Re:Google by CaptCovert · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is this what you're looking for?

    2. Re:Google by moteyalpha · · Score: 1

      I believe this is it. I did not see it. http://nion.modprobe.de/blog/archives/660-123467890.html

  25. I was so close... by Paul+Wolfe · · Score: 5, Funny

    > time.pl
    1234567889 (Fri Feb 13 23:31:29 2009)
    > timepl.
    timepl.: Command not found.
    > time.pl
    1234567893 (Fri Feb 13 23:31:33 2009)

    Stupid typo!

    1. Re:I was so close... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most of us use command recall. Let this be a lesson to you.

    2. Re:I was so close... by Bandman · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Though I just used watch -n 1 to make sure I caught it

  26. numerology: factors of 1234567890 by cats-paw · · Score: 4, Informative

    123456890 = 2 * 5 * 17 * 751 * 967

    Aaargh ! If only it had been prime.

    Oh, wait just 1 more second.

    1234567891 is prime :-)

    --
    Absolute statements are never true
    1. Re:numerology: factors of 1234567890 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      sorry to break it to you but the set of even primes is quite small.

    2. Re:numerology: factors of 1234567890 by FrangoAssado · · Score: 5, Funny

      sorry to break it to you but the set of even primes is quite small.

      True, an even prime is really odd.

    3. Re:numerology: factors of 1234567890 by fire4ever · · Score: 0, Informative

      The number 2 is even and it's prime.

    4. Re:numerology: factors of 1234567890 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what makes it odd!

    5. Re:numerology: factors of 1234567890 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah 2 is quite odd

    6. Re:numerology: factors of 1234567890 by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      that's not even funny

    7. Re:numerology: factors of 1234567890 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re:numerology: factors of 1234567890 (Score:5, Funny)

      by FrangoAssado (561740) on Friday February 13, @07:28PM (#26851615)

      sorry to break it to you but the set of even primes is quite small.

      True, an even prime is really odd.

      False, this just isn't funny.

  27. I want a day off! by macraig · · Score: 1

    Eh, call me when they decide to make it a national holiday and give me the day off. Bah, humbug!

  28. Aquarius by waterford0069 · · Score: 1

    And just before the dawning of the Age of Aquarius. w00t!

    1. Re:Aquarius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, there are barely 600 years left.

    2. Re:Aquarius by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately, living in a basement makes it difficult to "let the sunshine in".

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  29. It looks like by fishthegeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google got in on the action too.... here's the screen grab.

    Google 1234567890

    --
    load "$",8,1
    1. Re:It looks like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You linked to the snipurl link to a picasa-hosted screengrab, when the direct url to the logowould have sufficed.

      You're the reason we can't have nice things.

  30. Dr Who! by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

    Hey I'm helping run a Dr. Who convention this weekend in Los Angeles, we have our own TARDIS. I'll celebrate it as many times as I want!

  31. In case you wondered what is special by Bromskloss · · Score: 2, Funny

    about the number in question, I might have found an explanation. Consider the sum, as n goes from zero to b-1, for some base b, of n*b^(b-n). For the case of b=10, which seems to have a special meaning to some people, the sum results in the celebrated number.

    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
  32. drinking game by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    every time 0 = timestamp % 0; drink! May be a short night.

  33. Have a nice Doomsday! by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Doomsday cults are based on weird ambiguous predictions by lost civilizations, medieval seers, or some crazy dude who just knows how to rant in an entertaining manner:

    I turned to see the voice that spoke with me. Having turned, I saw seven golden lampstands.
    And among the lampstands was one like a son of man, clothed with a robe reaching down to his feet, and with a golden sash around his chest.
    His head and his hair were white as white wool, like snow. His eyes were like a flame of fire.
    His feet were like burnished brass, as if it had been refined in a furnace. His voice was like the voice of many waters.
    He had seven stars in his right hand. Out of his mouth proceeded a sharp two-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining at its brightest.
    When I saw him, I fell at his feet like a dead man. He laid his right hand on me, saying, "Don't be afraid. I am the first and the last, and the Living one. I was dead, and behold, I am alive forevermore."
     

    Against competition like that, some silly pattern in a computer clock simply doesn't rate!

    1. Re:Have a nice Doomsday! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Against competition like that, some silly pattern in a computer clock simply doesn't rate!

      No shit Sherlock. Computers don't get the good drugs that people get. And we want to keep it that way.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Have a nice Doomsday! by fm6 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I take it you didn't recognize the book I'm quoting from, and you think it was written by some hippie on LSD. Well, by some definitions he's a hippie, but it definitely wasn't LSD!

    3. Re:Have a nice Doomsday! by rts008 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      ...and you think...

      Wow! You can read minds...over the internets!?!?

      Read mine please, because I don't understand my own thoughts!

      signed,
      Some Hippie on Peyote...'cause "...it definitely wasn't LSD!" [extreme sarcasm implied]

      Just because someone does not:

      a. Subscribe to the same reading list as you
      b. Does not share your beliefs
      c. Has better things to do than track your world view
      d. All of the above in addition to relevant points left out ...mean that you are the "End all" and "Know all" of information and doctrine/dogma for the rest of us.

      I will willingly admit to ignorance about the 'book' you were quoting, but I will entertain the question of it's application here as being relevant to the discussion.

      If it is a 'religious text', don't bother trying to 'enlighten' me, as it is all just mindless, psychotic, delusional ramblings as far as I am concerned. If not religious, then use this opportunity to 'educate us/the unwashed masses'.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    4. Re:Have a nice Doomsday! by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I can read your mind. No psychic powers, just transparent thought processes.

    5. Re:Have a nice Doomsday! by rts008 · · Score: 1

      So then enlighten me, asshat...because I am calling BullShit.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    6. Re:Have a nice Doomsday! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OKAAAAYY...
      Here it is:
      You are a dork.
      And everyone here agrees.

    7. Re:Have a nice Doomsday! by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      I googled the text the previous poster quoted and apparently it's from "revelations" which I'm pretty sure is part of "the bible" so it's only natural that most regular people can't recognize the quotes from it while most jews (mostly the post-messianic ones) seem capable of throwing out a seemingly endless number of random quotes from it.

      I would've been more impressed by a quote from Principia Discordia but I suppose the bible has it beat when it comes to the sheer amount of insanity.

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    8. Re:Have a nice Doomsday! by daveime · · Score: 1

      Except Revelations was tacked onto the end of the bible based on the prophecies of some old guy living in a cave for 40 years, somewhere around 300 AD I believe. Sounds like a case of one too many magic mushrooms to me.

    9. Re:Have a nice Doomsday! by fm6 · · Score: 1

      What he said.

  34. 23:31:06 UTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2009-02-13 23:31:06 UTC - 1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC = 1234567890 seconds. 24 seconds later, Unix time was the same number. POSIX compliant Unix time doesn't have leap seconds, but UTC does.

  35. epoch = 0x49999999 is on monday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    % date -ud @`hextodec 49999999`
    Mon Feb 16 16:51:37 UTC 2009

    And no, 0x50000000 isn't one second after that.

    1. Re:epoch = 0x49999999 is on monday by ais523 · · Score: 1

      Although 0x50000000 is also a Friday 13th, in 2012.

      --
      (1)DOCOMEFROM!2~.2'~#1WHILE:1<-"'?.1$.2'~'"':1/.1$.2'~#0"$#65535'"$"'"'&.1$.2'~'#0$#65535'"$#0'~#32767$#1"
  36. list of celebrations... by mevets · · Score: 1

    more like places to avoid.

  37. Happy Unbirthday by Stickerboy · · Score: 1

    Congratulations on your 1001001100101100000001011010010 seconds, Unix!

    --
    Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  38. google front page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    google briefly changed their logo the below graphic:

    http://www.google.com/logos/unix1234567890.gif

  39. My unix age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool, I was born in the first year of Unix! Seriously, I may be the Unix messiah! I'll start by commanding "We must learn to forgive our fellow Unix people for their transgressions.*"

    * except for Darl McBride

  40. Re:zomg zomg let's party like it was 1111111111 !1 by mkiwi · · Score: 1

    I've always wanted to say to Prince (queue Dave Chappelle accent):

    1999 called- it wants its party back.

  41. 2,000,000,000 = May 18 2033 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As here.

    Linux will be on the desktop in 2033!

  42. I almost missed it by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I got a screen capture but I almost missed it because I was thinking about the epoch in the scene on my background image. That is Apollo 17, Station 6 at about 91918279.

  43. Nice party, let's do it again by Rhone · · Score: 1

    Great party guys! I'll see you all 2361 to celebrate 12345678900!

  44. Only 123.4567890 Seconds Since... by ComputerPhreak · · Score: 1
  45. Not actually the new epoch by EZLeeAmused · · Score: 1

    Get your facts right. Because there wasn't a 0, the new epoch actually began at 1234567891

    --
    Some see the vessel as half full; others see it as half-empty; We pour it out on the floor and laugh
  46. Heh by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    I suspect most of the posters in this thread need no excuse to be "celebrating", but rather it is a regular occurrence. Tsk Tsk.

    Meanwhile, this "auspicious" has happened on (dum, de dum, dum dum!) a Friday the 13th! Seems suspicious to me, like someone planned it, for nefarious reasons, no doubt.

    If I make a "paper boat", that is large enough, from tin foil, will that count?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  47. Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Satu by cmdrcoffee · · Score: 1

    Ignignot: Aqua Teens! Come on out and meet your doom. For we are Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday! Rabbot: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday... Ignignot: No, one week is enough.

  48. Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... missed it by 7583 seconds!

  49. 1431655765 seconds by amchugh · · Score: 1

    1073741823 or 1431655765 seconds would have been a more appropriate celebratory milestone considering it's stored in binary form.

  50. date -r 1234567890 by gsa700 · · Score: 1

    $ date -r 1234567890 Fri Feb 13 17:31:30 CST 2009

    --
    "You do not support the root but the root supports you." - Romans 11:18
  51. this is comment number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    123

  52. Web page in Catalan? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Linked page is in Catalan?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catalan_language

    Weird.

    --
    No sig today...
  53. Missed It by maz2331 · · Score: 1

    Now the only thing I have to live for is for it to progress to 0x12:3456:7890 - which is a long time away.

  54. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seconds count you!

  55. ... please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh please... get a life people.. seriously.

  56. This does not impress me. by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 1

    I am only amused that the world did not end again. I mean, based on past experience.

    --
    I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
  57. On 3141592654 day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we should eat one billion pies!

  58. 1234567890 forever bound to love by mattr · · Score: 1

    Hello,

    I think 1234567890, falling on Valentine's Day for everyone between Paris and the Pacific, is now a date inextricably bound up with love. It's a once in a lifetime (once in history?) event and is just right to express the idea of sharing an instant in eternity with someone special.

    I made a special valentine card entitled, 1234567890 - Be Mine Forever that you can freely use any day, any year, to express your love for someone who might find the idea charming.

  59. This count is still inaccurate. by destruk · · Score: 1

    By solar mean time, it does not account for leap seconds between 1970 and today. Can any computer get a concept such as time, correct? And does anyone else care?