Slashdot Mirror


Handset Vendors Plug Micro-USB Charge Ports

ketan324 points to a Register story touting an agreement among several phone makers to settle on Micro USB for their phones' charging ports, writing "It's about time for these cellphone manufacturers to wise up and design a universal phone charger. Although many manufacturers have already 'standardized' to a mini-USB interface, there are many more out there who use proprietary adapters. I wonder how Apple will feel about this? Will they finally realize that their oh-so-special adapter is nothing more than a fudged USB interface?" No legislation required.

59 of 363 comments (clear)

  1. And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have working USB on my computer. Why the hell do I need to install a Motorola XP driver to charge my RAZR?

    1. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 5, Informative

      Often the standard USB current isn't enough to charge a device, so you must install a driver which does nothing more than increase the USB power output.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    2. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by corsec67 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why the hell do I need to install a Motorola XP driver to charge my RAZR?

      Maybe Windows leaves sending the "You can take up to 500mA" signal to the driver for the device?

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    3. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by jandrese · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because of the way USB is designed. If your device does not get attached to a driver, it is stuck on low power mode, which is not sufficient for charging a phone. When a driver is attached, the driver can ramp the port up into high power mode and charge the phone. Often times if you know what you're doing you can avoid installing the whole "driver suite" and the crappy apps you don't want and instead just copy over a .dll file to let your computer charge the phone. Google is your friend in these cases.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by corsec67 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Voltages. The driver has to tell the computer what voltages it uses. It's from the USB spec,IIRC.

      No, USB Vcc is +5 volts.

      Per the USB spec, the device isn't supposed to draw more than 100mA from the port without authorization from the computer.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    5. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually I worked for a company that made things that charge of USB once and I talked to the person who decided such things. He explained the "not allowed to draw more the 100mA before enumeration" rationale. I showed him my USB hard disk. It has two plugs, one of which is just to leach power, so it manages to draw 500mA from each plug. And actually most USB widgets are dumb - no microcontroller - and draw more than 100mA. And I've never seen them fail to work on any USB host.

      I couldn't convince him to make the device charge without a driver though, even though enforcing the spec like this probably just pisses people off. Actually it's worse than that, there are wallwarts that supply 5V (often at 1000mA or more) to a USB connection but don't have a USB host. Devices that refuse to charge before enumeration won't work with those either.

      Actually I think there's an argument for drawing power off the bus, and only limiting current such that the 5V line stays in spec, i.e 5V±5%. That way you could safely draw more than 500mA from a USB wallwart which could supply it but did not enumerate.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    6. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by damaki · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Because that when the device is not identified by the OS, the power output is capped to 100mA. When identified, it can go up to 500mA.
      The evident solution would be to use a standard passive driver.

      --
      Stupidity is the root of all evil.
    7. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by swillden · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have working USB on my computer. Why the hell do I need to install a Motorola XP driver to charge my RAZR?

      Because Windows sucks.

      You didn't expect a different answer from slashdot, did you? ;-)

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    8. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nonsense. I have been able to charge both my previous phone (Motorola RAZR) and my current phone (LG Rumor) from my Ubuntu-powered PC, no drivers necessary. (Posted from my Rumor, BTW.)

    9. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by corsec67 · · Score: 4, Informative

      In Linux, it seems like the power negotiation is part of the USB driver, not the specific device driver, since every device should do that the same way.

      (So, even if there is NO Linux driver, or with the driver not loaded, the power negotiations can occur)

      Which is a good idea, really.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    10. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If your phone identifies itself as a USB Storage device, it can raise the power without its own driver, since it is recognized by the USB mass storage driver.

    11. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Informative

      The USB device driver does a Set Configuration

      And the max power (in specified in milliamps, freakin' software engineers) is part of the configuration descriptor.

      http://www.beyondlogic.org/usbnutshell/usb5.htm#ConfigurationDescriptors

      So the spec says you can draw upto 100mA until it gets a SET_CONFIGURATION request, and that is done by the device driver.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    12. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because of the way Microsoft's USB stack is designed. If your device does not get attached to a driver, it is stuck on low power mode, which is not sufficient for charging a phone.

      There, fixed that for ya.

      USB RFC standards lay out the process for increasing output current of a USB port, which should be a passive process. The USB device must simply apply a specific resistance across the USB pins to 'ask' the USB port to go into 'high power' mode. Whether the hardware or software vendor complies is a different story, but I've never had an issue charging high-power USB devices in linux.

    13. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by Why2K · · Score: 5, Informative
      From the USB standard, section 7.2.1 (emphasis mine):

      A unit load is defined to be 100mA. The number of unit loads a device can draw is an absolute maximum, not an average over time. A device may be either low-power at one unit load or high-power, consuming up to five unit loads. All devices default to low-power. The transition to high-power is under software control. It is the responsibility of software to ensure adequate power is available before allowing devices to consume high-power.

    14. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by damaki · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not about not charging, it's about charging slowly.

      --
      Stupidity is the root of all evil.
    15. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by xouumalperxe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My guess is that your MP3 player is showing up as a bog standard HDD unit, which is then treated as a fully identified device. The devices that need drivers are the ones that want to show up as something else that would require drivers to actually work properly (not just charge). I guess that's a reasonably smart behaviour that prevents some burnt devices. Your dumb LCD screen USB port probably couldn't care less about what's connected to it, so it gives juice to whatever asks for it.

    16. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by frieko · · Score: 4, Informative

      Clearly Motorola is either (a) being careful to comply fully with the USB spec, or (b) being dicks.

      I would say there's about a 50/50 chance of each.

    17. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually I think there's an argument for drawing power off the bus, and only limiting current such that the 5V line stays in spec, i.e 5V±5%. That way you could safely draw more than 500mA from a USB wallwart which could supply it but did not enumerate.

      Hmm, it turns out there is a standard way to detect wallwarts

      http://www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs/batt_charging_1_0.zip

      Basically host chargers short D+ and D-. If a device detects this it can draw a higher current.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    18. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by PitaBred · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Windows USB functionality is severely backwards... why is my damn phone a different device when I plug it into a different USB port? Does the port address somehow magically make it behave differently? Can you tell that it's annoying having to plug every new device into every single port on my computer and installing the driver so that I don't have to worry about that when I actually want to use the device?

      Glad I only use Windows for gaming and to update my Blackberry's software.

    19. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by torkus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seeing as how their phones don't like to charge with a plain-jane blackberry wall-wart I'm going to lean towards the phallic choice you suggest.

      Try explaining to a secretary why the "right charger" - 'look, it fits' won't charge her VP's phone when it clearly works 'it just charged his blackberry!'

      Ugh...

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    20. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by Annorax · · Score: 2, Informative

      I vote for (b), since they don't provide their special power adapting drivers for OS X. In my case, it's the same issue with their W385 phones -- no driver -- no charging.

    21. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by 2short · · Score: 2, Informative

      Which is a lovely spec, but it's fiction.

      All sorts of devices pull whatever power they can get regardless. It's so common that a port that doesn't supply 500mA regardless of enumeration must be considered de-facto defective.

      It may adhere to the spec, but if half the stuff made with the right plug on the end doesn't work when you plug it in, no consumer will care. And in fact, pretty much every USB port you find will happily supply 500mA to anything you stick across the relevant pins.

      As for the RAZR, I assume the driver supports other functions, it really ought work as some generic 500mA consuming device for just charging.

    22. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by 2short · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You don't (and can't) "detect" power on a line, nor can a hub "throw" power at them.

      The hub is supposed to keep the voltage at 5V. How many amps that causes to flow through a device is up to the device, which is supposed to be smart enough to limit itself to 100mA until has gotten permission via software to draw more. All manner of devices ignore this because it's a few cents cheaper to not include those electronics, and just pull whatever you feel like. Hub makers must deal with this or have their products melt and not sell, so they deal. But it's the device that is wrong. No machine maker in their right mind will include a port that can't supply 500mA right off the bat, because the standard is so universally ignored.

    23. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by Obfuscant · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yeah, I doubt it could change the computer to provide more, but it might be telling the phone "ok to charge at 5V". Dunno. Stupid to have to install a driver to do that anyway.

      I would suspect that the moto charger does 5.2 and that's how the phone detects "dumb" charger.

    24. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by Aczlan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Though I've got no actual hard evidence to back it up, I seriously believe there's some sort of ultra-cheap DRM built into the chargers and phones to prevent you from buying reasonably priced travel/home replacement chargers.

      It APPEARS that the difference is that some USB chargers put out 5.2 volts instead of 5. The phone likes 5.2V. It doesn't appear to like the 5V, but I think it is charging ok anyway. I've never run it down far enough to know for sure, so I can't swear that it does.

      Everything else I charge on both warts charges ok, so I just swap the two if the green light on the phone doesn't come on.

      The "Cheap DRM" is almost correct, the issue is that the "OEM Motorola" chargers have a resistor between pins 2 and 3 (center pins) of the mini USB plug, no USB communication (from a computer), or resistor and the phone wont charge.

      Aaron Z

      --
      "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote
    25. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by digitalunity · · Score: 2, Informative

      The OS controls the USB host controller which sets maximum current per port. Assuming the drivers are available for your host controller, Windows and Linux can both direct the host controller to operate within spec.

      Unidentified USB devices are limited to a lower current than identified devices. This was done to prevent 'dumb' electronic devices from sinking too much current and breaking the output drivers on the host controller.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    26. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by jacksonj04 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They don't get the power they need to operate, but may think that they do. I spent ages trying to figure out why an external DVD drive wasn't working properly because it had enough power to tell the host it was there, appear as a device etc but not enough to actually function.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    27. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is a very simple solution to this that does not involve any drivers - USB HID devices.

      I create my own USB devices (http://denki.world3.net) and almost always use HID instead of a special driver. Even if the phone is not a "human interface device", you can just create a special kind of HID device that the computer will basically ignore. You can still do any custom communications you like but the device will install on Windows/Linux/Mac without the need for a driver, and you can specify the amount of current you want.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    28. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by maxume · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is it drawing 0.5 amps?

      Are you sure it isn't using the built in mass storage driver?

      Etc.?

      0.1 amps is fine for overnight charging of small devices, but it really isn't all that nuts for people to expect their phone to charge completely in a couple of hours. That you don't care isn't necessarily relevant.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    29. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by justzisguy · · Score: 4, Informative

      You certainly can pull 500 mA from a port without the device asking politely, but it won't be compliant with the spec. From the USB 2.0 spec, 7.2.1, "Devices must also ensure that the maximum operating current drawn by a device is one unit load (100 mA), until configured."

      The 5.0 V rail, VBUS, does not monitor the sourced current, making sure that no devices are drawing more than what they've politely asked for. The current limiting is done to protect against a direct short, often limiting a single port to 1 A (or more for ganged ports higher)

    30. Re:And why the hell do I need a driver for this? by sjames · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I couldn't convince him to make the device charge without a driver though,

      GOOD! If you think charging slowly will piss people off, see what dragging down vcc until every device on the hub mysteriously and randomly malfunctions will do! Or if the hub is smarter, try no charging at all because the device violated spec and the port was shut down to keep it from causing problems for compliant devices.

      Keep in mind that if several devices all try your strategy, it's quite likely that one or more will introduce terrible ripple. It's also possible that some poor hub that's perfectly compliant (though a bit fragile) will be damaged.

      There is, however, no reason the phone shouldn't present itself as one of the standards defined devices so that a generic driver can enable it for full power.

      At the same time, there IS a battery charging specification for USB. A dumb charger can comply just by having a current limiting resistor across the data lines. A USB port can also use the spec to agree to provide 1.5A to the device if it is designed to do so.

      By staying within the spec, the phone gets to charge, won't damage anyone's hardware, won't cause random malfunctions, and WILL be permitted to bear the appropriate USB logos. One of the best things about USB is that there are actual specs and most everything obeys them reasonably. That's why USB devices tend to just work if the OS has decent USB support. The last thing we need is for a bunch of phones to start cheating and turn USB into a random crapshoot like Plug'n'Pray.

  2. Yay! by Nerdposeur · · Score: 3, Insightful

    About time.

  3. data, audio, and power by goombah99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    cell phone cables need to be able to support digital data, power and analog multi-channel audio input(microphones) and output (speakers). Some also need to support RGB or S-video out

    USB can do the first two. I may be mistaken but I don't think that USB can support those analog channels.

    So the connectors are not "oh so special" they are actually accomodating what is needed.

    If you want a minimalist approach of having a single docking connector then you need to have all that functionality.

    the alternative is to have a lot of different input/output ports or even mulitle ways of doing it.

    For my simple cell phone, I say yes! all I want is a USB charger so I can charge it off my laptop with any available cable. That's great. But for people with those uber-phones well USB is not going to hack it so it is kind of silly to complain.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:data, audio, and power by jandrese · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You have a phone with S-Video out? Anyway, if you have a phone with a bunch of obscure ports like that, wouldn't it be better to have a separate connector for the power/data/digital audio from whatever weird ports you also have? Separate headphone jacks are hardly unique.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:data, audio, and power by nine-times · · Score: 4, Informative

      iPhones don't need RGB or S-Video

      They do if you have movies on them, and want to output those movies onto a TV screen. People probably don't do that very often, but you can do that.

      Audio input and output do not (or at least should not) use the same plug as power/data (otherwise you can't charge your phone and use the headset at the same time).

      iPods and iPhones have 2 different audio outs-- one being the headphone jack, which on the iPhone can also be used for headsets. So you can use that headphone jack while charging. The other audio out is in the dock connector, and it makes it so you can drop the iPhone into the dock and have the dock connect to a stereo. If not for that audio out, you'd have to drop it into the dock and then plug an additional cable from your stereo into the headphone jack.

      Not only would that be slightly annoying and inconvenient, but it's my understanding that the audio from the dock is also handled differently than the headphone jack. I'm not a real audiophile, so I don't remember what the deal is, but it's something like the dock connector not running the audio through the iPhone's built-in amp. The idea is you're going to feed it into a stereo and have volume control through that stereo anyway, so it shouldn't need to deal with that. Instead you (supposedly) get cleaner audio out to your stereo.

    3. Re:data, audio, and power by Phroggy · · Score: 3, Informative

      iPhones don't need RGB or S-Video, so no, they're connectors don't need to be anything other than USB. Audio input and output do not (or at least should not) use the same plug as power/data (otherwise you can't charge your phone and use the headset at the same time).

      Choose Component or Composite A/V cables to connect your iPhone to a TV. Included in the box is a USB charging adapter, so you can charge your iPhone while playing movies if you don't want to connect it to a computer. All of this connects via the single dock connector, which is standardized across both models of iPhone and several recent models of iPod (see the list at the bottom of each page). So, once you get everything hooked up, you can just leave the cable in place, and whenever you want to connect your iPhone (or your friend's iPhone, or your other friend's iPod) it's just one plug to connect it to your TV and charge the battery at the same time.

      Remember, the iPhone has a built-in camera. Why wouldn't you want an easy way to plug it into a TV and show your family and friends the pictures you've taken?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    4. Re:data, audio, and power by glennrrr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      USB can supply everything and the sooner a giant like Apple is pushing it, the sooner we all get these ridiculous cables out of our living rooms and offices.

      There's no need for video-out, there's no need for line-level audio out.

      This is just not very well thought out. USB is only useful when connected to a master computational device, almost always a Mac, PC or Linux box. It's ridiculous to expect it as a means to connect to the stereo system of a car. It's also ridiculous to force people to use a non-line level output to connect into a stereo. What would you have me do in my 2003 Civic? Install an onboard computer which somehow knows about some non-existent protocol to get a digital stream of music out of my iPhone. Use the headphone jack so I have the joys of balancing the audio every time I plug in?

      Or maybe I can use good old analog line level out of my iPhone's dock connector. Plug it in to a single cable which charges the phone and gives me a line out. I can even keep the headphones plugged in and in one ear so I can handle incoming calls or conveniently controlling the audio with the clicker button.

      Honestly, where do these memes come from? USB is a horrible hack of a connection protocol (spoken as someone who's written the occasional USB driver), which does a slow, shoddy job as a charging connection, and who's only benefit is ubiquity. I'm still unhappy Apple dropped Firewire charging mode, at least that was a decent power connection, not this pathetic 500mA USB mode.

  4. the oh-so-special adaptor is more than just USB... by bstreiff · · Score: 2, Informative

    To be fair, the iPod dock connector carries more than just USB. And the USB dock cables work on pretty much any model iPod.

  5. oh-so-special? by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder how Apple will feel about this? Will they finally realize that their oh-so-special adapter is nothing more than a fudged USB interface?"

    Oh, like Apple is just using the dock connector to be "special"? It's true that the dock connector is *mostly* USB, but it also can carry audio and video so that, with only a dock, you can output to a stereo or TV. Also, the audio put out through the dock is supposedly different from what comes out of the headphone jack (I believe they aren't amplifying the audio from the dock), meaning you can get better quality for outputting to a stereo.

    So I don't know why the submitter has to turn this into an Apple-bashing thing. Apple actually uses standards pretty often. And often, when they do stray from a standard, it's in order to provide specific functionality-- and even then they often release the specs for their version, allowing others to adopt it. For example, I believe they released the specs for their custom "mini display port" that they're using without requiring any kind of licensing fees or anything.

    1. Re:oh-so-special? by Theaetetus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So I don't know why the submitter has to turn this into an Apple-bashing thing. Apple actually uses standards pretty often.

      Apple was the first to push widespread adoption of USB, IEEE1394, 802.11n, and MPEG-4, among many other standards.

    2. Re:oh-so-special? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      On the other hand, they specifically implemented an authentication chip that prevents video output on newer ipods if you use anything but officially blessed cables. There are certainly reasons for the dock connector; but that doesn't change the fact that Apple's approach toward accessory makers has pretty much been "flip over and shake until money stops coming out".

    3. Re:oh-so-special? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a line level signal as opposed to headphone level signal. There's a difference. If you're running the signal through an external amplifier, you want line level.

    4. Re:oh-so-special? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Funny

      So I don't know why the submitter has to turn this into an Apple-bashing thing.

      You must be new here.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    5. Re:oh-so-special? by Logic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Excellent point. Just to head off other people talking out of their ass (wishful thinking, I know), the pinout for the iPod/iPhone connector ought to be required reading before commenting on what it can and can't do. That connector provides interfaces for USB and Firewire, audio in/out, video out (composite and s-video), serial, and dedicated power.

      It's not an ideal situation, but a single cable covers just about every possible use case. That's a big deal, ergonomically, and it means Apple can standardize internally on an interface across multiple product lines.

      It's unfortunate: the knee-jerk reaction to "we need a universal charger" will miss the opportunity to standardize on a SINGLE interface cable for mobile devices, rather than using USB for power and data, a headphone jack for audio output, and who knows what proprietary arrangement for audio input and video output.

      --
      -Ed Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.
    6. Re:oh-so-special? by bucky0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      [Citation Needed]

      I have a new iPod touch that works fine with some handmedown generic cables.

      --

      -Bucky
    7. Re:oh-so-special? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This and this are examples of the genre.

      I've yet to see much in the way of technical breakdown of the issue; but it is unequivocally the case that they, deliberately, added proprietary secret sauce to the iPod video out process, in order to capture a larger percentage of accessory revenue.

      This article is also worth a look. I doubt that they are doing anything illegal; but Apple is anything but a fuzzy friend of standards with respect to the dock connector.

  6. No legislation required.... by try_anything · · Score: 5, Funny

    The threat of legislation was enough.

    I'm sure the handset makers are deeply saddened by this. Clearly, this unwelcome meddling by government will hurt consumers by ending competition in this vital technical matter. Why, instead of buying the latest high-tech replacement cable custom optimized for advanced synergy with their handset, people might replace a lost cable with an abandoned, misbranded, maybe even second-handed cable from an older handset. This could cost consumers literally incalculable amounts of synergy and innovation. Why won't the government just let capitalism work?

    1. Re:No legislation required.... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds like we need an astroturf group to take up the cause. I wonder if "Consumers for handset innovation" is taken?

    2. Re:No legislation required.... by db32 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know! I was going into the comments to see what other amusing jokes may have been made and was stunned to see all of these people frothing about the post. I don't know if I should applaud the GP or be deeply depressed by so many people not getting the PAINFULLY obvious sarcasm.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  7. China and South Korea already did this, no? by Dekortage · · Score: 3, Informative

    We discussed this issue back in 2006, though for a different continent. But if South Korea and China can do it, why not the rest of the world? Seems like it would be a win-win for manufacturing, if nothing else.

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
  8. Re:Voltage and current by Otto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I take it this means that if I have a USB hub then my cell phone is always on low power charge mode. Otherwise I don't see how a computer could decide how much current to supply when multiple devices are attached in parallel via a hub.

    USB hubs are more than mere wiring, they have to have some minor amount of intelligence. There's two basic kinds of hubs: bus-powered and self-powered. Self-powered hubs have a separate power source (wall outlet, etc) and are allowed to provide up to 500 mA to devices connecting to them, which is the same as the high-power mode for normal USB ports. This allows those devices to charge. Bus-powered hubs can't do this, they're basically limited to the amount of power they get from the USB port itself.

    A second question is, why don't devices supply their own drivers when you plug them in?

    Because that's not possible in the USB specification. The "no-driver" devices really use a default set of drivers that have their characteristics predefined in the USB specs.

    Also, it's a bit of a security risk for a device to be able to send executable code to the PC and actually have it get executed.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  9. Apple connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I too wouldn't mind a more standard charging connector, I see no reason why a mini-usb for getting power, AND a custom plug with more ability than simply power and a slow one to one data comm protocol for one host (the PC)

    http://pinouts.ru/Devices/ipod_pinout.shtml

    That link shows both the iPod and iPhone connector. I am actually in the process of designing some nice attachments to the iPhone using a combination of USB, firewire, and a ttl serial port.
    None of those things outside of the one USB connection would be found in USB.

    Mini-USB won't let me get composite video out, or audio out to plug in my car stereo, or audio IN.

    However, the practice of bastardizing the USB jack so it is only useful for power, and rare (or nonexistent) data purposes, totally needs to die.

    I mean, I can understand if the phone doesn't Have those abilities at all, then of course the USB jack shouldn't. But just using iPhone as an example, plugging it in with the USB connector only makes it show up as a camera device to access pictures. Nothing else. And those antics are BS and should go.

  10. Nope, just getting in on the cable racket. by raehl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Legislation (or threat of legislation) had nothing to do with it. The legislators are already all bought and paid for.

    The problem is that selling replacement chargers only works from a profit perspective when the profit from the replacement chargers you're selling offsets the cost of the free chargers you're including with the phone. That worked for a little while, but then generic manufacturers got involved, and the money made selling replacement chargers stopped beating the money spent including free chargers.

    So the phone companies are switching over to the printer+USB cable/HD TV+HDMI cable model. With standardized chargers, they don't need to include a charger with the phone anymore, saving them money. And then the retailers can sell you a phone, and then also sell you a $2 charger for $80. $120 if it's gold plated. $180 if it's gold plated and made by Monster.

    1. Re:Nope, just getting in on the cable racket. by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gold plated Monster cables make the phone charge faster, you philistine!

      Pffft, I bet you're driving around on tires inflated with used air.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  11. Re:Voltage and current by compro01 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes. I have a small generic self-powered USB hub that does exactly that. Worked nicely for charging by Motorola KRZR, at least until I lost that phone.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  12. Mod parent as +5 VDC by Rayban · · Score: 4, Funny

    And 500 mA of good idea.

    --
    æeee!
  13. Depends on the model by DrYak · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some hubs will start providing 500mA on each port right after plugin in.
    Some hubs will stay off and wait to be enumerated before powering up.

    I've had both type in my possession.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  14. Re:Voltage and current by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Posting as AC because i can't log in from work, so i hope this gets seen. I have a USB modem from novatel wireless that has a small amount of memory onboard, and when plugged in mounts itself as a cdrom drive under windows or mac, and pops up to install it's own drivers. (under linux it uses the standard kernel driver for CDMA modems, no extra driver needed). I think it's a pretty cool idea, no matter what OS you're using, two clicks at most from plugging it in and it just WORKS, no driver cd, no needing to download drivers, nothing.

  15. I love it! by SupremoMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So they decide on universal ports for chargers.... but nothing about accessories. I love it! Even funnier, they say nothing about this generation micro-USB chargers working on next generation phones! Don't worry guys, they'll find a way to fleece us yet!