Slashdot Mirror


Confusion Reigns As Analog TV Begins Shutdown

As TV stations across the country switch off their analog signals, uncertainty reigns. Some 691 stations will have converted to digital broadcasting by midnight tonight (some interpreted the mandate as going digital by Feb. 17, not during Feb. 17, and shut down yesterday). This represents about a third of TV broadcasters nationwide. No one can say how many of the estimated 5.8 million households unready for the transition are in areas served by the stations that are switching now. The FCC added to the uncertainty by imposing extra conditions, making it unclear until last Friday exactly which stations would be switching at the beginning of the transition period. The article quotes a former analyst at Barclays Capital who said the whole process has been "botched politically."

19 of 434 comments (clear)

  1. Once again... BFD by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why the heck are we getting a story posted on this almost daily? Who cares? I've read the threads, and it's not a big deal. Anyone with half a brain will be fine. Anyone else, well, maybe there are survival of the fittest selection standards still hitting us, on occasion. I don't see that as a bad thing.

    1. Re:Once again... BFD by hurfy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even tho that has nothing to do with reality?

      If they didn't get one yet, they are screwed anyway...well unless the CW was the only* station here that you wanted to receive tomorrow! Can even the half-brains watch that station and only that station all day ?!?

      I am confused as to why they made it more confusing.....

      *Disregarding Ion television which appears to be on a low-power transmitter.

    2. Re:Once again... BFD by Dallas+Caley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously, we've got more important things to worry about in this country that weather people can watch their soaps on channel 4. Why are we wasting money on this.

      Here's a wake up call to all those who are watching regular TV and can't afford to get a box. Perhaps they should stop watching so much TV and get a real job

    3. Re:Once again... BFD by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are also quite a few people who (probably for quaint religeous reasons), still rely on the analog wireless broadcasts to receive their pre-scheduled, pre-chosen video stream.

      Everyone I know who watches OTA TV does it by and large for one reason: It's free.

      Yes, you have to watch ads, nothing is free, blah blah blah, but the fact remains that once they've bought the set and the antenna they don't have to pay to watch TV. In my jurisdiction, basic cable is nearly $450 per year. Some people just choose to spend that $450 elsewhere.

    4. Re:Once again... BFD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The part he nailed on the head was that it's the networks who care, not the majority of the consumers. If the networks don't have anyone to watch their ads, they won't have anyone to buy ad space.

    5. Re:Once again... BFD by nick.ian.k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here's a wake up call to all those who are watching regular TV and can't afford to get a box. Perhaps they should stop watching so much TV and get a real job.

      Because anyone who can't work such a box into a tight budget obviously hasn't got a real job, right? Because your baseless judgement of other people's situations relative to your own just flat out reign supreme? Here's a wake up call to you and every last fake Libertarian shitbag who modded you insightful: yes, we know you've managed to obtain jobs just good enough to afford a few luxuries, not struggle vary hard, and yet, between all that exalted 80+ hours a week "real job" time, find time to bitch about the failings of the poor and lazy on Slashdot, and tip us off to the truth: you just robbed another lazy sad sack of a position, and if not for you, one more person could've bought the box already, or even cable, and done what you've done here.

    6. Re:Once again... BFD by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While I agree with the sentiment, the one serious counter-argument I'd give is that you need to ensure that people are able to receive public safety announcements. TV is much better than radio for dealing with severe weather, because being able to see the weather maps and storm tracks gives you a much better idea of what's going on. Going into tornado season in Oklahoma (where I grew up) without TV would make me a little uncomfortable.

      Recall that we (the people) give the broadcasters the right to use the airwaves in exchange for them providing public services: news, weather, and emergency announcements. We decided these things are important, so its important to make sure their accessible.

      But at the same time, this has been coming for a long time, people should have been able to figure it out by now.

  2. Re:My biggest problem with all of this... by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. I disagree - the amount per person is too small. It would be like one of those $1.60 checks you get in the mail for some class action settlement you'd rather not have been a member of.

    2 & 3. I'm sorry it didn't work out for you. For me, I got only a few fuzzy channels before with severe ghosting and now I have all the major networks, crystal clear with only occasional drop-outs. I almost never turned on broadcast TV before, and now the picture is good enough to watch hockey. I guess this is very much a YMMV situation.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  3. Why keep pushing back the deadline by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If grandma hasn't upgraded the old Philco black & white by now, she probably never will (until forced). As for the coupons, there was no reason they couldn't have extended the coupon program but still kept the original timeline.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Why keep pushing back the deadline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because Obama's advisor for the DTV transition works for a company that benefits from the delay. Until that chunk of the spectrum becomes available to the people who paid for it (mainly Verizon & AT&T), his company has less competition.

  4. Re:Revolt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Good point. Americans are likely to get extremely angry when [1] they can't watch TV, and [2] the price of gas breaks a psychological barrier, like $2. The problems?

    - What percentage of Americans receive their TV over the air?

    - Congress is currently experiencing approval ratings rivaling David Duke at the Million Man March, yet over 90% of the current Congress was re-elected. I voted 100% anti-incumbent this fall, and maybe Americans should wake the freak up and stop just voting party lines. Congress is well aware of this: they can do anything [and I mean, ANYTHING], and they WILL get re-elected.

  5. Re:most are the elderly many alone and without fam by Propaganda13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If people haven't heard what to do then they're not watching enough tv. They've had plenty of test blackouts scheduled with numbers to call if they are not receiving a digital signal.

    My 90 year old grandmother was ready 6 months ago. She watches the least amount of TV of anybody I know. I really don't think it's old people that aren't setup.

  6. Re:Across the country? by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nobody said US-only. It's a lot simpler to make up a point than to actually make one, isn't it?

  7. Re:My biggest problem with all of this... by CodeBuster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Today, they broke compatibility and they've failed to offer enough to justify it.

    I disagree. The UHF spectrum was simply to valuable for society to continue to allow a few analog TV holdouts to continue squatting on some of the most valuable parts of the EM spectrum for free or minimal cost. Part of the reason why wireless services in the United States are so behind Europe, Japan, and even China is because there are lots of legacy squatters occupying prime pieces of EM spectrum real estate for peanut change. The EM spectrum rights should go to whomever is willing to pay the public the most for them, and nowadays that is wireless telecom companies such as Verizon, AT&T, and Sprint/Nextel not grandma with her Philco black and white analog TV that she has not upgraded since 1964. if the remaining analog TV users wanted to continue using the UHF spectrum, preventing the rest of us who are willing to pay from getting next gen wireless services, then they should have bid against the telecoms in the auction. Analog TV lost because other uses are worth more to more people, plain and simple.

  8. The scrolling text on my screen will be over soon by theurge14 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Over 12 months of wall-to-wall "PLEASE UPGRADE YOUR TELEVISION BY FEBRUARY 17, 2009!" covering the entire bottom of my screen.

    If you haven't seen that by now and made plans you deserve to have your TV dropped on your head.

  9. Re:Revolt by jalefkowit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I doubt even 50% of the people polled even understand that Congress and Senate are part of the same government branch...

    Actually, it's the House of Representatives and the Senate that are part of the same government branch, which is collectively referred to as the United States Congress.

    If you're going to be calling half the people in the country idiots, make sure you're in the other half first ;-)

  10. Oh yeah... It is time for action by Shivetya · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After this wonder demonstration of government incompetence I say let us let them manage our Health Care and Health Care records!

    At least we know they are demonstrably bad at most of what they do, so we won't have higher than normal expectations.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  11. Last one to leave-- turn out the lights... by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Finance has crashed, housing has crashed, oil is crashing, retail is crashing, now here begins the media. Maybe now I can get some peace and quiet.

  12. the near-sighted geek by westlake · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Seriously, we've got more important things to worry about in this country that weather people can watch their soaps on channel 4. Why are we wasting money on this.

    Because it affects our most isolated and vulnerable populations. the elderly, the poor, and the disabled.

    Look around you.

    Find out where these people live.

    How these people live.

    Four hours spent on a rural bus run can be very educational.

    The third-rate nursing homes.

    The group homes and apartments built on barren agricultural lots five miles from the nearest traffic light.

    The tenant houses and run-down trailer parks you never gave a thought to.

    $90 a month as a personal allowance.

    Out of which will come your co-pays for therapy and drugs and blood work.

    Capped at perhaps $300/yr.

    Life-Line phone service at 10 cents a minute.