Shuttleworth Announces Karmic Koala
An anonymous reader writes to mention that Mark Shuttleworth has announced the next release in the horribly alliterative Ubuntu family, "Karmic Koala." The new version hopes to include a newer, shinier, faster startup, better small screen support, a spruced-up desktop look (no more brown), and many minor tweaks and updates. "A newborn Koala spends about six months in the family before it heads off into the wild alone. Sounds about perfect for an Ubuntu release
plan! I'm looking forward to seeing many of you in Barcelona, and before
that, at a Jaunty release party. Till then, cheers."
I've always been fascinated how the Debian (and derivatives) releases have functioned. Each branch is like a chamber in a revolver; as it reaches 'stable', it aligns itself with the barrel ready to be fired off to the masses.
Better yet, they passed up the chance of a snappy name like Karmic Khameleon Imagine the new colors they could bring to their new desktop scheme...
Disclaimer: I am not god.
We may not be created equal
But we can be treated equal.
Am I the only one who likes the brown color scheme?
I find that it's easy on the eyes without being outright drab, but maybe that's just me.
It only looks cute and cuddly. Actually try to cuddle a koala and it'll bite you, claw you, and shit on you.
Or so I've heard...
Best Slashdot Co
I was hoping for King Krimson.
I actually thought this was a joke when I first read it. Especially with the cloud computing bullshit.
Support my political activism on Patreon.
The ratings were pretty high for Kinky Klingons, but seems like they were cast aside for being less exotic.
I have a tendency to make things up
Face your daemons!
I just wonder if the next will be Leaping Lizard.
Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
They tried, but it had a bad effect on reliability. The system would come and go, would come and go-oo-oo...
kola...isn't that a KDE program? Then again, shouldn't this whole release be KDE-only? I mean, it's all K's...
... is that it scatters its seeds by explosion, into the remains of a forest fire (which it promotes via its extremely flammable sap and the tinder pile of leaves and shed bark it creates around itself - apparently "in the hope of" getting the fire started B-) ). A row of eucalyptus trees during a fire can become the equivalent of a walking artillery barrage targeting a fuel dump.
So I certainly wouldn't want to compute on a eucalyptus cluster - even if it is a "cloud" floating far away (like over the Berkeley Hills - high enough to be visible from I5 north of Sacramento). I'd worry about it taking out the data center and my data with it and "distributing" it up to the tropopause and onward with the prevailing wind.
As for my laptop, no WAY I'll install any eucalyptus package on that. It's got enough problem with those lithium batteries with the energy density of a hand grenade without adding something more with the energy density of napalm.
= = = =
And I thought Ubuntu had an unfortunate choice of names. Good grief!
Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
The system would come and go, would come and go-oo-oo...
On behalf of the entire Slashdot community, I thank you for getting one of the worst songs ever written stuck in everyone's head.
One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
It's 2009. Over twenty years since the original Macintosh was released. Twenty years since the fundamentals of UI element spacing, text rendering, text kerning, verticle and horizontal text alignment, colour usage...
And the latest Ubuntu, the 'gold standard' for Linux desktops, is a complete mess:
* Text kerning problems all over the place
* Alignment problems in almost every single text field or label
* Almost random colour choice for UI elements
* UI elements having no consistent alignment or spacing
* UI elements that look like they come from some amateur 1990s Mac/Windows clone
Honestly, the toy apps I throw together in Interface Builder look like polished commercial grade software compared to almost everything I see in Linux. I can only assume that there is no standard Linux UI building tool equal to Interface Builder.
Microsoft is on the ropes with Vista and frantically rushing Win7 out the door. Cheap netbooks are doing major damage to the OS profit margins.
And Linux continues to be a UI train wreck. Silly names. Stupid package management with insane dependencies. Redundant and competing desktops. License wars. Mass duplication of common apps with each version sucking in their own unique ways and no single app every getting to the point of being a drop in replacement for commercial Mac/Windows versions.
Even something as trivial as the damn Solitaire app looks like a complete piece of shit.
Boggle.
Awww crap. Kubuntu Karmic Koala. That won't be good for business.
/. trolls haven't picked up on that one yet.
Can't believe the
No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
Ah, that explains the "no more brown" bit.
How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
Shouldn't that read "the appallingly alliterative Ubuntu family"?
Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
...Stupid package management with insane dependencies. ...
And you say this as a Mac user, using an OS that doesn't even have a unified package management system (And no, .pkg files don't count, since they aren't unified and there's no built-in update of uninstall mechanism)?
Your post should have been marked troll, flamebait or Macfanboi, and I say that as a Mac user myself who owns three Macs.