Slashdot Mirror


Music-Swapping Sites To Be Blocked By Irish ISPs

An anonymous reader writes "Irish internet users are to be blocked from accessing music swapping websites, as internet service providers bow to pressure from the music industry. Eircom, the country's biggest internet provider, is to start blocking its internet customers from accessing music swapping."

194 comments

  1. Useless by wvmarle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Totally useless and a mere inconvenience for the die-hard file swappers. New sharing sites will pop up faster than I can say "First Post!" and new protocols to circumvent those blocks will have arrived by the time the mods have moderated "First Post" down to -1.

    1. Re:Useless by pwizard2 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Proxy demand increasing in Ireland in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1...

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    2. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...with a post like that, it seems you've never found yours. Perhaps ~you're~ the girrrrrl in this story ; )

    3. Re:Useless by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      Proxy demand increasing in Ireland in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1...

      I should start a business selling proxy services to Irish internet users. My connection will never be filtered in Australia.

    4. Re:Useless by Z00L00K · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And most protective measures on the net against this are leaking like a colander.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    5. Re:Useless by dooby_Monster · · Score: 1

      Is it not possible to just get this .torrent file from someone who does have access ??

    6. Re:Useless by eltaco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      apparently, you fail to realise, that eventually they don't care about the hardcore pirates. the "scene", for instance, has been alive for years and subject to many raids. those that know how to protect themselves are essentially untouchable by law. same goes for any criminal smart enough. (same goes for politicians!) enough! listen;

      the MAFIAA's interest is to stop the widespread, common and easily available sharing of media. the "sheeple" ,as people like to call them, who use whatever their popups claim to be the best.

      of-fucking-course the "scene" will still be alive. those people that know enough to evade prosecution, know enough to rip dvds too. but as long as you can discourage the general population (with lawsuits) from file-sharing, they might've made their point - legal and moral ambiguities as they may be.

      as soon as people get pissed off enough, another Bram Cohen will emerge. Either declaring a new method or meeting the MAFIAA eye to eye in the courts - or shaking their hand.

      --
      It's not about fate, it's about character.
      there be no shelter here, the frontline is everywhere!
    7. Re:Useless by oojimaflib · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Totally useless and a mere inconvenience for the die-hard file swappers. New sharing sites will pop up faster than I can say "First Post!" and new protocols to circumvent those blocks will have arrived by the time the mods have moderated "First Post" down to -1.

      True as this undoubtedly is, I think this is the wrong attitude to take. Simply saying, "OK, Mr. Government, if you want to block bits of the internet go ahead, we'll just work round you." gives the impression that they have the right and justification to censor bits of the internet at will and it's up to us to work round that.

      While the sort of people who read slashdot are able to circumvent this kind of thing, does that make it right to censor the internet for the rest of the less technically savvy population?

    8. Re:Useless by hyk · · Score: 3, Funny

      As an Australian, this makes me laugh, and also cry.

    9. Re:Useless by Kjella · · Score: 1

      but as long as you can discourage the general population

      Haven't we pretty much established that they can't? They've tried it every which way except capital punishment and I doubt that'd do any better. There's too many, they're not afraid and they don't agree. Even if they were afraid they'd use any one of the slightly more secure ways than public torrents or just share with their friends. Many of the pirates are also their best customers, buying much and downloading more. Downloading is getting cheaper, faster and more secure every day. For each passing year another of the "new generation" replaces the old, people that are already used to file sharing.

      That's why they're going after centrals like TPB, that's why they're trying to enlist ISPs and laws enforced by the government. You know there'll always be places like TPB to gather (remember suprnova? not like that was the end of anything). ISPs honestly don't want this death march towards impossible goals because customers will always find new ways to obfuscate data. Law enforcement seriously got better things to do than 15yo girls sharing music, even in the "War of" series the "War on Pirates" will lose to the war on drugs, terrorists, organized crime, pedos and whatever else.

      The future comes when we all have enough bandwidth we don't even care about "proxing" it to someone else, and then they'll have no chance of stopping friends-of-friends networks. Nobody needs to know of each other, we simply just pass it along so one friend of mine could download from another friends of mine without knowing each other, not even by IP. Today I wouldn't do that because my connection isn't that fast. Give me a 100Mbit or 1Gbps symmetric and I won't even care. That is just one of many ways they will keep on losing.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    10. Re:Useless by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Is there something wrong with creating a culture of internet-savvy and security conscious individuals?

      Maybe we can get them all to stop browsing the web with Administrator access and turning off their AV software because it was flagging that new Britney Spears MP3 as a virus, and we all know only .exe's can contain virii!

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    11. Re:Useless by Cormacus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It doesn't make it right, but it does reflect the general sort of hopelessness that (some? many? most?) people feel when they think about trying to get the government to write legislation that is in the public's interest rather than in the interest of large companies/corporations.

      --
      Mon chien, il n'a pas du nez. Comment scent-il? TrÃs mauvais!
    12. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an Australian, this makes me laugh, and also cry.

      As an American, I'd like to laugh too, and say, "Ha ... this here is the Yoo-nited States of America, where bad things don't happen." But I'd be fooling myself: won't be long before this happens here, what with a Department of Justice pre-loaded with ex-RIAA lawyers, and a Congress largely owned by big media.

      Yeah, we're screwed too. Just a matter of time.

    13. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do I encrypted connection?

    14. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's intended to bring back the flagging business that a lot of pubs have experienced in regards to the younger generation. If you're going to force things into sneakernet mode, then places that are convienient for trading your USB flash-drives are going to become popular. May as well make a night of the filesharing and have a few pints while you're there, right?

  2. Oh well by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    I guess it's back to the more private networks. How's that wireless mesh coming along to help get around these people?

    --
    What?
    1. Re:Oh well by howlingmadhowie · · Score: 2, Informative

      i don't know about ireland but in germany there is a debate as to the legality of having an unsecured wifi net.

    2. Re:Oh well by umghhh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In Germany many things are illegal ('verbotten') as long as citizens are concerned. This is immaterial as soon as some gov. agency breaks the law to get data on citizens for instance. I suppose that is what our constitution means by 'sozial'.
      It is interesting to observe how they are squeezing our rights with every occasion. I stopped buying CDs long time ago and did not move to illegal copying as I did not see anything useful to copy - it may be however that soon I will be paying tax to these bastards anyway. I wonder where does this stop? OC laws and actions that could help with spamming, cyber-criminality of any kind etc are left out as they are too difficult to handle and there is no lobby to pay the fee.....
      This all is very sad indeed.

    3. Re:Oh well by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      It's the threat of wireless mesh that provokes these laws. Gotta keep that grip. Of course they'll tell you it's fur die Kinder.

      --
      What?
  3. Good Old Racketeering by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, it's the virtual equivalent of paying thugs to block access to a store.

    Call the lawyers.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Good Old Racketeering by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      no. it's more like paying thugs who then go block access to the wrong store.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    2. Re:Good Old Racketeering by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Good to see we can occasionally agree on something ;)

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:Good Old Racketeering by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Except that in this case, the thugs are the virtual equivalents of the local sheriff, and he things you're the bad guy in town.

    4. Re:Good Old Racketeering by knarf · · Score: 1

      More like paying thugs to block access to a roof overseeing a concert venue where people would otherwise congregate to listen without paying

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
  4. "Music swapping"? by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Informative

    The fucking article mentions Pirate Bay as one of these "music swapping" sites. So basically, they're after torrent trackers.

    I won't go into explaining the difference between a hypothetical "music swapping" site and a tracker. Insert here gun, car and other analogies.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:"Music swapping"? by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 3, Funny

      I won't go into explaining the difference between a hypothetical "music swapping" site and a tracker. Insert here gun, car and other analogies.

      So, basically, it's like Fannie and Freddie are angry because you drive your car way to fast in front of their subprime real estate and then hatch an evil plan to bring down the entire car industry. Awesome!

    2. Re:"Music swapping"? by Mozk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Irma, which represents major music groups EMI, Sony-BMG, Warner and Universal, is to begin compiling lists of websites that it claims are damaging its business.

      Does this include sites like Magnatune, which offer independent music at much lower prices or even for free? I mean, that's damaging to its business, right?

      --
      No existe.
    3. Re:"Music swapping"? by hattig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If only Ford, Chrysler and GM could compile a list of car salesrooms that are damaging their business!

      If the list was compiled by a disinterested party then it's one thing. But this is just an industry lobby group compiling a list of what it doesn't like, i.e., what the companies it represents doesn't like. Legitimate uses or not, surely it is only a matter of time before bittorrent traffic is filtered out at the network level, whether it is carrying a Linux ISO or a Project Gutenberg Archive.

  5. Worse than useless. by El+Jynx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yep. This is only going to stimulate: - a rapid development of secure p2p protocols. - a rapid adoption of encryption. - a lot of annoyance and public backlash. On the side, Ireland has one of the highest budget deficits in the EU. That means they're in a lot of financial trouble already, and lots of people are going to be out of jobs. But they aren't going to let "them" deny them access to their movies, songs and audiobooks; moreover, things like The Teaching Company (TTC) and BBC documentaries provide an extremely rich source of self-enrichment. People are going to be teaching themselves all matter of upgrades in their newfound free time. Anyway, all you Irish people can do now is roll out the Guiness and write your local political factions that this just isn't a good idea.

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it well worth the effort.
    1. Re:Worse than useless. by norpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If filtering like this begins to become common then I would imagine we would see systems similar to the large botnets start to emerge for torrent trackers, using fast flux and the likes to keep domains and IP addresses moving.

    2. Re:Worse than useless. by sakdoctor · · Score: 5, Funny

      We could trade files right here on slashdot.

      Bit of steganography and we could hide music in our rambling car analogy loaded posts.

    3. Re:Worse than useless. by digitig · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do you have a car analogy for that?

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    4. Re:Worse than useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they're encouraging R&D then? Cool!

    5. Re:Worse than useless. by ResidntGeek · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That's slow. Anyone who wants to trade unreleased live music by mail, send your trade list to residntgeek@gmail.com. I do audio and video trades.

      --
      ResidntGeek
    6. Re:Worse than useless. by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      People are going to be teaching themselves all matter of upgrades

      Upgrades? You mean they're going to go into the woods, kill lots of squirrels and level up? ;-)

    7. Re:Worse than useless. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Do you have a car analogy for that?

      You got a fast car
      I want a ticket to anywhere
      Maybe we make a deal
      Maybe together we can get somewhere

      Anyplace is better
      Starting from zero got nothing to lose
      Maybe we'll make something
      But me myself I got nothing to prove

      You got a fast car
      And I got a plan to get us out of here
      I been working at the convenience store
      Managed to save just a little bit of money
      We won't have to drive too far
      Just 'cross the border and into the city
      You and I can both get jobs
      And finally see what it means to be living

      You see my old man's got a problem
      He live with the bottle that's the way it is
      He says his body's too old for working
      I say his body's too young to look like his
      My mama went off and left him
      She wanted more from life than he could give
      I said somebody's got to take care of him
      So I quit school and that's what I did

      You got a fast car
      But is it fast enough so we can fly away
      We gotta make a decision
      We leave tonight or live and die this way

      I remember we were driving driving in your car
      The speed so fast I felt like I was drunk
      City lights lay out before us
      And your arm felt nice wrapped 'round my shoulder
      And I had a feeling that I belonged
      And I had a feeling I could be someone, be someone, be someone

      You got a fast car
      And we go cruising to entertain ourselves
      You still ain't got a job
      And I work in a market as a checkout girl
      I know things will get better
      You'll find work and I'll get promoted
      We'll move out of the shelter
      Buy a big house and live in the suburbs
      You got a fast car
      And I got a job that pays all our bills
      You stay out drinking late at the bar
      See more of your friends than you do of your kids
      I'd always hoped for better
      Thought maybe together you and me would find it
      I got no plans I ain't going nowhere
      So take your fast car and keep on driving

      You got a fast car
      But is it fast enough so you can fly away
      You gotta make a decision
      You leave tonight or live and die this way

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    8. Re:Worse than useless. by cypherwise · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the plus side:
      1) maybe more labels and artists will spring up that won't hamper their fans with such limitations or threaten them with lawsuits.
      2) secure p2p would be sweet
      3) ???
      4) Profit???! (maybe for proxy operators)

    9. Re:Worse than useless. by Ihmhi · · Score: 2

      It's like duct-taping a thumb drive to your undercarriage and driving across the border.

    10. Re:Worse than useless. by thenickdude · · Score: 1

      Oh lawdy, is dat some cp?

    11. Re:Worse than useless. by HailSatan · · Score: 1, Funny

      I can't believe this comment has the only instance of the word "drunk" in reply to an article about Irish people making stupid decisions

    12. Re:Worse than useless. by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      we could hide music in our rambling car analogy loaded posts.

      Do you have a car analogy for that?

      Sounds good to me

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    13. Re:Worse than useless. by kcbanner · · Score: 1

      Thanks, got "the package". *wink*

      --
      Obligatory blog plug: http://www.caseybanner.ca/
    14. Re:Worse than useless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get drunk enough, and you can hear Tracy Chapman sing about a "Fat Ass Cock" and a ticket to anywhere.

  6. Rapidshare? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So Rapidshare is blocked, then? And Megaupload? And Mediafire, Sendspace and Badongo? And the hundreds of other free filesharing services that seem to pop up everywhere?

    This is completely futile.

    1. Re:Rapidshare? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Or youtube for that matter?, there are many times where I go on Youtube /just purely/ to listen to music.

      Will that be blocked aswell? :-)

    2. Re:Rapidshare? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure this is only the first step in a ongoing strategy to block access to unlicensed content. Once bittorrent is blocked, free upload sites, Usenet, eMule, DC and FTP will follow. Email attachments will be removed and http binary transfers will be interrupted.

      I wouldn't be surprised if we saw the perplexing headline "Internet to be blocked by Irish ISPs" before the end of the year.

    3. Re:Rapidshare? by Mozk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My problem with this is that sharing files is not illegal, nor is sharing music. Sharing copyrighted files without rights to do so probably is in Ireland, but forcing ISPs to block legitimate sites in a broad manner like this because they have the potential to "damage" your business is bullshit. And blocking the Pirate Bay is another brand of bullshit since the only file-sharing going on there is with .torrent files.

      --
      No existe.
    4. Re:Rapidshare? by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      Or youtube for that matter?, there are many times where I go on Youtube /just purely/ to listen to music.

      The RIAA and its conduits have agreements/contracts with Youtube.

      That being said, the RIAA is the Catholic Church of the new musical middle ages; they have far reaching powers beyond any political boarders, and they can ruin people. They can infiltrate and influence entire business sectors, and even entire governments.

    5. Re:Rapidshare? by legirons · · Score: 1

      Or youtube for that matter?, there are many times where I go on Youtube /just purely/ to listen to music.

      Will that be blocked aswell? :-)

      wait till they hear secondlife can stream music and block that...

    6. Re:Rapidshare? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nobody Expects the RIAA!
      Out chief weapons are suprise... Surprise and idiocy...

    7. Re:Rapidshare? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And IRC, and messengers, and usenet, and skype, and social pages, and...

      Does that leave anything but corporate sites open?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Rapidshare? by EvilIdler · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have they blocked *other users*? That is where the shared data is ACTUALLY coming from.

    9. Re:Rapidshare? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And blocking the Pirate Bay is another brand of bullshit since the only file-sharing going on there is with .torrent files.

      In addition to that, the majority of the stuff you can get your hands on by using the services of The Pirate Bay is actually legal to share.

      (Don't believe me? Check for yourselves. Pick a bunch of random .torrent files and analyze what content they describe. Your findings might prove enlightening. Oh, and that's not even mentioning the fact that no unauthorized distribution of material subject to copyright takes place on, from or through The Pirate Bay. None, whatsoever. A .torrent file has nothing in it except metadata about other stuff. But y'all already know that, of course.)

    10. Re:Rapidshare? by cliffski · · Score: 0

      hahahahaha

      you believe that?

      I just checked the top few movies in their top 100. Copyrighted. Wow golly gosh, what a surprise.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    11. Re:Rapidshare? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Cardinal Fang. Fetch...THE COMFY CHAIR!

    12. Re:Rapidshare? by shoemilk · · Score: 1

      What about google? That's where I search for torrents first...

    13. Re:Rapidshare? by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      They might as well block Quicktime in that case, since that's all Second Life uses to stream. SL isn't doing anything special, you'd have to go after the Shoutcast server operators, except that a large number of them actually pay licensing fees and broadcast legally.

    14. Re:Rapidshare? by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      hahahahaha

      you believe that?

      I just checked the top few movies in their top 100. Copyrighted. Wow golly gosh, what a surprise.

      Let's reflect on how you failed. You tried to follow the GP's sound statistical suggestion ("Pick a bunch of random .torrent files and analyze what content they describe.") but you hadn't yet learned the meaning of "random."

      I'll give you a hint. It doesn't mean "the most popular .torrents in the movie section." If you can figure out what random really does mean, you'll find that 80% of the .torrents point at legal content.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    15. Re:Rapidshare? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      > the majority of the stuff you can get your hands on by using the services of The Pirate Bay is actually legal to share.(Don't believe me? Check for yourselves. Pick a bunch of random .torrent files and analyze what content they describe...)

      I just checked the top few movies in their top 100.

      Google search define:random

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    16. Re:Rapidshare? by cliffski · · Score: 0

      Lets reflect on what you meant.
      over 95% of the content on the site is illegal.
      Happier?

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
  7. IRC? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are they going to block all IRC access as well? There are lots of files being shared via DCC send commands. I suppose some IRC servers might expect an increase in user numbers in the near future...

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:IRC? by orlanz · · Score: 0

      Shhh, the 1st rule of IRC, you don't talk about...

    2. Re:IRC? by ThePromenader · · Score: 0

      ...talk about what?

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    3. Re:IRC? by ThePromenader · · Score: 0

      Er, what's that? ...Does it like "sports"? Does it like "pic-tchaaas"? Nudgenudge winkwink?

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    4. Re:IRC? by yabos · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah because no one has ever heard of IRC

    5. Re:IRC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well they have now. Thanks for ruining the internet. Jerk.

    6. Re:IRC? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Are they going to block all IRC access as well?

      It's mostly kiddyporn there, rather than music.
      So blocking IRC is a lower priority.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  8. Meanwhile in financial news... by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All ISPs in the Irish Republic report reduced revenues and profits.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Meanwhile in financial news... by Nazlfrag · · Score: 4, Funny

      In other news, a huge spike in sales of VPN services was reported.

    2. Re:Meanwhile in financial news... by trawg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I just scanned the article but this looks like a misleading subject.. basically only one ISP is doing this (although it's the biggest), and the others have been threatened with legal action (just like what is happening here in Australia, with one of our ISPs targeted by the media industry and currently getting sued (disclosure: our site) for not taking action against file sharers).

      So, this is basically ISPs caving to legal threats - which I guess either means they're complete pussies, or they have deals with the ISPs to provide content themselves (ie, sell music to their subscriber base) so its in their financial interests to comply, or they've actually crunched the numbers with their lawyers and Irish law doesn't look so good for ISPs.

      If that latter is true, THEN I would believe reduced revenues might be likely - or if this ISP is just the biggest because it has a monopoly on infrastructure or whatever. If it's not though, users should just vote with their feet and jump ship on this ISP and go to one that is not going to tell them what they can and can't do with their Internet connections.

    3. Re:Meanwhile in financial news... by Synthlight · · Score: 2, Informative

      All ISPs in the Irish Republic report reduced revenues and profits.

      If the ISPs really do see a drop in profits then they may try to fight the decision, even if it's for the wrong reasons.

    4. Re:Meanwhile in financial news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or if this ISP is just the biggest because it has a monopoly on infrastructure or whatever.

      Yes, that's exactly what it is. Eircom was formerly the government owned telecoms provider. It was privatised several years(Which was a complete disaster as every attempt to privatise a national company has been in this country, see Aer Lingus) but it still owns and operates virtually the entire telecommunications network in the country.

      So for most people in the country, there's only one ISP: Eircom. In Dublin there's a few more but all DSL providers are still Eircom by another name because they simply pay to use Eircom's network. There's just ONE Cable internet provider: NTL and it only serves a few areas of Dublin.

      This reflects the state of virtually everything in the country. There's just one choice for everything or the one or two alternatives are jokes. Usually even the one choice is a joke. The country doesn't even have a single hypermart.

    5. Re:Meanwhile in financial news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also the unfortunate incident (brought up in court) of Eircom high-speed broadband advertising appearing on Piratebay.

      http://www.mulley.net/2008/09/03/eircom-via-googles-doubleclick-advertises-on-piratebay/

  9. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  10. SWEET by orlanz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Next up, socially and politically insensitive speech, porn, nude/violent/graphic images, low price merchants, and communication with unenlightened societies.

    So many to choose from, it makes me dizzy just from thinking... oh, thinking!

  11. Free Music by troll8901 · · Score: 5, Informative

    For a related discussion on free (and non-RIAA) music, see:

    I've just downloaded one artist's Creative Commons songs, and it's not half bad. I'd imagine he might earn cash on freelance composition.

  12. NYCL by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    Call the lawyer.

    There, corrected it for ya.

    1. Re:NYCL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize, of course, that NYCL is ... American... and this is ... shockingly ... happening in Ireland, where NYCL means nothing?

    2. Re:NYCL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      There, I corrected it for you.

      :)

    3. Re:NYCL by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      *blushing furiously* (at being caught not RTFA)

    4. Re:NYCL by Mr+Abstracto · · Score: 1

      *blushing furiously* (at being caught not RTFA)

      ...or the title.

  13. That's brave of them by thewils · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Clearly, now the ISPs are responsible for any music-swapping that occurs since they've taken it upon themselves to determine what is or isn't legal.

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    1. Re:That's brave of them by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

      ...since they've taken it upon themselves to determine what is or isn't legal.

      No. They are just accepting IRMA's determinations.

      --
      Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
    2. Re:That's brave of them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's worse. Instead of being liable for their own decisions, which they could at least control, they'll be liable for somebody else's decisions.

  14. Far worse than useless. by ztcamper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Proxy. Nuff said.

    1. Re:Far worse than useless. by ameyer17 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or, if they implement this how I think they will, a quick DNS server switch should do the trick.

  15. Useless ISP's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good, I think we need to block internet access to all of Ireland then ;). The internet is meant to be uncensored. If you can not understand that then you don't need access. The people that want to do it will just use other ways like IP tunneling.

  16. Stupido lady there no ' for ISPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You stupido lady

    How many ISPs ?

    How many stupidos ?

    1. Re:Stupido lady there no ' for ISPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About 100,000 stupidos for every ISP.

  17. I can haz censorship? by mrraven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Between political correctness on the left, intolerance on the right, and pressure from crony capitalists to wall off their monopoly profits, pretty soon the only thing you'll be able to post on the internet will be cat pictures. :(

    --
    Tired of all the isms, don't exploit people as an employer, or a government, mmmmK?
    1. Re:I can haz censorship? by daveime · · Score: 1

      HAI
      CAN HAZ PROXY ?
      KTHXBAI

      (Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.) ... um no, it's called LOLCODE, get with the program, you stupid filter !!!

    2. Re:I can haz censorship? by GauteL · · Score: 4, Funny

      "pretty soon the only thing you'll be able to post on the internet will be cat pictures. :("

      How dare you?? Don't you know that underneath all that fur, those cats are completely naked?

    3. Re:I can haz censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they like to lick themselves *all over*!

    4. Re:I can haz censorship? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      LOLCAZ WINS!

      (insert relevant cat picture here)

      So it's true. The internet, once created to distribute knowledge, exchange ideas and generally contribute to propagate information is reduced to the same crap TV was reduced to a while ago.

      First they brought in the AOLlers. But I didn't speak up because they didn't step on the same turf I went, and I didn't care because "my" internet was vastly different and richer than theirs. Then they brought in the companies. But I didn't speak up because they had money, but I didn't care about their sites since I didn't plan to spend money on the internet past the online fee expense. Then they brought in the Social Networks, but I didn't speak up because I didn't want to participate in them.

      Now they take away my net. And nobody is speaking up because everyone's busy surfing, buying and "making friends" to care that a part of the net that was important to me, that I considered important enough to create an outcry should it vanish. Yet nobody notices it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:I can haz censorship? by knarf · · Score: 1

      Sure. Download two of those pictures, take a binary diff of the LSB of each pixel and out rolls the latest by U2... or download one kitty and a file containing random noise, decrypt the noise with kitty and Hello U2 again. This block will be sooooo effective...

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
    6. Re:I can haz censorship? by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Informative

      lolcode is worse than yelling. By quite a bit.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:I can haz censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean like this ? http://www.picato.net/cat/?CatID=5927&cID=115063&mp=4 (NSFW)

    8. Re:I can haz censorship? by tychovi · · Score: 1

      I know, REALLY! Think of the kittens!!! Has anybody considered their rights!

    9. Re:I can haz censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does someone shit in your cornflakes every morning, or was today special for you?

    10. Re:I can haz censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the cat wear cloth over it's fur? If not then the cat is even completely naked period.

      Drawoc

    11. Re:I can haz censorship? by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have a problem with the "cult of ignorance" that is springing up. We're celebrating people and their behaviour that would have caused ridicule only decades, maybe only years ago. Take "reality TV shows" like Big Brother. Moronic lowlives whose life was already uninteresting when they weren't monitored permanently become celebrities for, essentially, being unable to communicate or to do anything meaningful with their life. Or American Idol. Young people making a complete tool out of themselves for the minuscle one-in-a-million chance to become famous (not rich. Only famous). And I'm not talking about Springer, though at least there I could imagine it's scripted and just for "tha lulz".

      We live in a time when being a jerk becomes something praiseworthy. It makes you famous. Makes you some sort of role model in a way, judging by how many copycats spring up for every jackass idiot video of the "how stupid can a human being be and still be able to utter some sort of sound for communication" category on YouTube.

      lolcats fall into that category. It's not funny. It's simply retarded. It's about as much fun as laughing at the retarded kid that can't figure out how to drive his electric wheelchair in any but a circular pattern. That's fun for about 5 seconds. Tops. After that, it's just plain boring, repetitive, always the same ol' crap that, if you're really honest, wasn't even funny the first time. It's especially not funny to mangle the English language "4 tha lulz". My excuse is that English is my third language. What's yours?

      I love to communicate and exchange ideas. That's what I like about the internet. It allows that. The drawback is that it also allows the exchange of braindead memes.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:I can haz censorship? by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      Political correctness kind of *is* intolerance, though. Just as a sidenote.

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    13. Re:I can haz censorship? by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      I kinda agree with you, but I think LOLCODE is different (from lolcat). It's a cool hacker toy.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    14. Re:I can haz censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but I myself prefer my pussies hairy anyway

    15. Re:I can haz censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mate, you're taking this way too seriously. Lolcats are just a characterisation of animals, and what they might say if they were able to speak. As for it dumbing people's intelligence down, well maybe that's true, but only if it's the only thing you do. You shouldn't preach to people what they should do in their spare time, maybe they've taxed their brains enough for the day, and just want to chill out.

      For example, I know an English professor who's had a one of their lolcats posted on the front page of icanhascheezburger.com Is that person stupid, just because they're not spending all their time analysing Shakespeare's plays, writing treatise, or pontificating?* I often take ten minutes in the day to look, and laugh at, lolcats. That doesn't mean I'm too stupid to read 'real' literature later on (currently reading Bleak House and before that The Brothers Karamazov), you're whole complaint is based upon a lame false dichotomy, that people who enjoy being silly are incapable of taking part in serious pursuits.

      You should stop judging people, it's mean, rude, pompous and -- since you're not perfect yourself -- it's hypocritical.

      * rhetorical question, the answer is 'no'.

    16. Re:I can haz censorship? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      pretty soon the only thing you'll be able to post on the internet will be cat pictures.

      I can haz internet?

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    17. Re:I can haz censorship? by Yetihehe · · Score: 1

      Now they take away my net. And nobody is speaking up because everyone's busy surfing, buying and "making friends" to care that a part of the net that was important to me, that I considered important enough to create an outcry should it vanish. Yet nobody notices it.

      Just post video on youtube how you cut yourself because they are taking away your freedom. And say you will bring gun to your local school.

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    18. Re:I can haz censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do I.

  18. Podsafe Music by eggman9713 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If they "accidentally" block Podsafe Audio http://podsafeaudio.com/ (All Creative Commons licensed content) that will prove how incompetent and underhanded the music industry and the ISPs are. I will be waiting for this to throw back into their faces.

    1. Re:Podsafe Music by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...that will prove how incompetent and underhanded the music industry [is]

      Incompetent? No. just that they see no need to actually verify that the content actually violates their copyrights. Besides, according to TFA, the agreement is that IRMA will supply lists of site they deem harmful to their business. Clearly, in their view, indy artists giving away music is harmful to the businesses of IRMA.

      --
      Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
  19. 1984 by mail2345 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Then anything that causes increased level of brain activity.
    The first thing any good dictator needs to prevent is critical thinking.

  20. Re:Just to be clear, these are music STEALING site by sleigher · · Score: 1

    Just so you know, I am pretty sure no one listens to April Wine anymore. Although, if you post that, 'Harder' and 'Faster' maybe some will listen.

    Look, I Like to Rock and I will Say Hello Tonite because I am a Ladies Man. Before The Dawn we'll have Babes In Arms so you Better Do It Well so you don't become a 21st Century Schizoid Man.

    --
    All points of time and space are connected.
  21. Re:Just to be clear, these are music STEALING site by mail2345 · · Score: 1

    Not always.
    They have legal uses.
    Like <insert car/gun/ect analogy>.

    Take for an example, the The Pirate Bay, they have otherwise censored documents about Scientology.

    Other positive uses include:
    Sampling
    Content that the makers no longer profit from
    Spreading legal material
    Getting around technical DRM issues(ahem Spore)

  22. I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what's the point? there are virtually thousands of anonymizing, privacy and proxies, trying to "block a site" is useless.

    To me it sound more like the ISPs are telling the music industry "shut the fuck up".

  23. Why do the music cartels have so much influence? by zooblethorpe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Simply in terms of gross earnings, the music companies make peanuts compared to some other very big industries being negatively impacted by all this anti-piracy hullabaloo (sure, corporations probably don't pirate music, but this DRM and filtering and other BS all carry a cost for anyone working online). Are they just that much better at lobbying? Have they somehow nobbled all the right people? What gives?

    Confused,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  24. So Ireland isn't a free country once again by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

    That's it, really.  How sad.

    1. Re:So Ireland isn't a free country once again by thermian · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's it, really. How sad.

      Freedom isn't defined by the ability to download music for free.

      This does amuse me. All these measures do is bring about new technology for sharing files. Well, that and win the people who came up with the idea promotions/votes.

      Anyone who thinks of things like this should be sat down and made to watch a film about prohibition. Then they might just realise how stupid they're being. Just arguing that they're doing the wrong thing won't work, because they don't think they are, and anyone who says they are is 'uninformed'.

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    2. Re:So Ireland isn't a free country once again by Gunstick · · Score: 1

      > prohibition

      Reminds me of the Simpsons episode with the bowling balls as beer containers.
      Just create virtual bowling balls and put the files in there (steganography or simple encryption)

      --
      Atari rules... ermm... ruled.
    3. Re:So Ireland isn't a free country once again by tg123 · · Score: 1

      time to migrate...

    4. Re:So Ireland isn't a free country once again by cliffski · · Score: 1

      well said.
      I love the kids who sat on their ass playing halo when guantanomo bay was set up and when the USA invaded iraq on the pretence of finding WMD that didn't exist, and which the USA had sold them anyway, but OMFG LOOK OUT! TAKE TO THE STREETS! because they might have to pay for music like honest people.

      Some people have weird priorities and senses of what is right and wrong

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
  25. Unexpected Win by Bob+A+Trollmuncher · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here in NZ we have been about to suffer one of the most draconian media industry walkovers that made the DMCA look like a wet bus ticket ... But then something entirely unexpected happened - the government actually after some shiny grassroot protests like the blackout thing that shut down many public sites here in NZ for the day. I might actually have some hope for democracy after all. http://creativefreedom.org.nz/

    --
    come to the dark side, we have penguins.
    1. Re:Unexpected Win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, your government accidentally the whole shiny grassroot protests?

    2. Re:Unexpected Win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously?!

      the government actually after

      You mean they didn't actually before? That's ... that's astounding!

  26. Re:"Music sites." Really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Do these conspiracy theories ever come true? They sure do rack up the karma...

  27. Oh no by Goffee71 · · Score: 2, Funny

    How will I get all those denim-clad, teen-spirited, Bewitched classics now?

    --
    If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
  28. Swapping by sneakernet by Bragador · · Score: 1

    If they do that, people will simply start forums where people can swap their collections by sending their 32 and + GB usb flash drives through the mail. I bet it would save them money doing that too since the Internet costs so much...

    1. Re:Swapping by sneakernet by RichM · · Score: 1

      You could be on to something with this. Maybe not flash memory but I can certainly see it being done with data DVDs full of the latest tracks.

  29. Horray, I get to use this again! by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

    President Madagascar!

    1. Re:Horray, I get to use this again! by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      Oh goddamnit, the one motherfucking time I enthusiastically click "submit" and there's a typo. Yeah, Murphy? You and your law can both go fuck yourselves.

      *ahem* anyway... President Madagascar!

    2. Re:Horray, I get to use this again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lulzy

    3. Re:Horray, I get to use this again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BitTorrent protocol encryption buys you no anonymity whatsoever, it's purely to evade traffic shaping. Indeed BT has no anonymity by design, it was never intended for mass copyright infringement and focuses solely on being as fast as possible.

      Freenet and i2p offer meaningful security, unfortunately this comes at a significant performance cost pretty much by definition. (Actually freenet is good for bulk transfers of somewhat popular data once your node is well-integrated, but it's still inherently high latency.) Also, they're harder to use and orientated towards anonymous censorship-resistant publishing rather than p2p. Perfect Dark may be a good option if your connection is fast enough (minimum 100k upload), however it's closed-source and windows only.

  30. I wonder if that also means.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are gonna have one headache keeping track of all the different torrent hosting sites o.0

  31. Re:Why do the music cartels have so much influence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I live here. They're my ISP, for about another ten minutes.

    Ireland is notoriously corrupt. Eircom didn't even fight the court case. I smell brown envelopes.

  32. personally I'm disappointed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I'm disappointed that my telecommunications provider does not block access to the landlines of brothels, drug dealers and anyone with an ongoing legal claim against them.

    1. Re:personally I'm disappointed... by Ashriel · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

      That's got to be the most apt and insightful analogy to situations like this I've seen on /.

  33. Lists by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

    Irma, which represents major music groups EMI, Sony-BMG, Warner and Universal, is to begin compiling lists of websites that it claims are damaging its business.

    Reminds me of the Red-scare issue when activist groups were creating lists.

  34. Is anyone surprised? by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    Ireland is a small country that has been riddled with political corruption for a long time. It has few natural resources (and as Brian O'Nolan once observed, the only words of Irish you really need to have a conversation on the West Coast are those for downpour, eternity, whiskey and potatoes. And he was Irish...)

    So Irish governments have had the idea of making Ireland a tax haven for "creatives" - writers, musicians and artists. Given the current financial doo-doos, caused in part by the diversion of so much of the EU infrastructure budget to other purposes, they will naturally turn to trying to keep the recording industry onside. And with Dell going, and Apple deeper in bed with the recording industry, they have no incentive to support anybody else's business model.

    Still, I expect the Irish communities around the world, full of people with enough go in them to want to escape, will welcome the influx of young well-educated people.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Is anyone surprised? by grarg · · Score: 1

      Sad but true. If I hadn't tied myself to a 35 year mortgage at the height of our property bubble (whyyyyy?), I'd have left by now.

      Ireland was a backward little shithole until the nineties and now, after 10 years of nouveau-riche boomtime spending, like white trash winning the lottery, we've spent all the money, we've nothing to show for it and the bailiffs are knocking.

      --
      The conclusion of your syllogism, I said lightly, is fallacious, being based on licensed premises
    2. Re:Is anyone surprised? by cheftw · · Score: 1

      In case you find yourself there;
      downpour -- dur -tun
      eternity -- shee - or - eee - uckt
      whiskey -- fwish - ke (alternatively ishka ba-ha)
      potatoes -- praw - tee

      I'd put the real Irish but slashdot would just eat all the nice accents.

      --
      Always back up, never back down. ---- Think you're cool 'cos your uid is prime? Take mine, modulo the one digit integers
    3. Re:Is anyone surprised? by VariableRob · · Score: 1

      Nah, that was just Haughey pretending to be cultured. "We may be poverty stricken with mass emigration, but look! We have A Singer! All is well in Ireland!"
      The most depressing thing is that it actually worked.

      --
      The seriousness of the above post is not guaranteed.
  35. "swapping" by cliffski · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Nice attempt at spin, but when you copy music from someone else that isn't swapping, unless you automatically delete your copy.
    Its copying, and with copyrighted music, its copyright infringement. Renaming it 'swapping' is just a silly piece of spin that holds no water with the law, nor should it.

    --
    DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    1. Re:"swapping" by Mascot · · Score: 0

      What spin? It's the word used in the newspaper article. I can't discern a shred of bias in that article.

      As for the word, I don't see any issue. Swapping implies giving and receiving. Exchanging. P2P services do just that. Unlike "theft", for example, the definition of "swapping" does not require the loss of access to what they exchange. At least not in the dictionary I checked.

      It does not infer legality in any way.

    2. Re:"swapping" by howlingmadhowie · · Score: 1

      that depends on the copyright.

  36. Re:"Music sites." Really. by unlametheweak · · Score: 2

    Do these conspiracy theories ever come true?

    Where have you been for the past 10 years? Haven't you ever heard of the banking industry?

  37. Re:Why do the music cartels have so much influence by Xest · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It goes something like this:

    Music industry lobby
    Lobbyist: Hi Mr MP, how would you like to meet Bono?
    MP: OMG HE WAS MY IDOL AS A CHILD I'D LOVE TO
    Lobbyist: Okay, just implement these laws otherwise Bono will be a very very sad person and might not want to come out and see you
    MP: Sure!

    IT industry lobby
    Lobbyist: Hi Mr MP, how would you like to meet Richard Stallman?
    MP: Who?

    More seriously though, I think the issue does seem to be at least from my experience of reading into comments from various British MPs that the music industry is much better connected and MPs are much more likely to bow down at their feet simply because although some people of their generation are the founding fathers of IT as we know it, many more simply missed the boat with the IT thing and MPs nearly always fall into the latter- they just don't get IT, but they ALL know who Bono and so on is and they all worship these types of people. We don't have any IT literate MPs here and I'm not sure it's much different abroad, Obama is one of the first politicians I've seen that actually seems to have a decent grasp of technology.

    I think the crux of it is that people in the music industry and politicians seem to get on well, they just seem to have the same mindset whilst IT and Science simply don't seem to get on with politicians as well. In that scenario it doesn't really matter what an industry is worth, most politicians don't seem to take a logical approach to decision making like that. They're more fallable to arguments such as "Piracy is wrong, it's illegal, it always has been, it must be stopped" than they were to reasoned arguments producing statistics showing piracy is only bad for the major labels but probably good overall for the population as a whole. If politicians did follow a logical, reasoned way of thinking then in the UK at least we wouldn't be seeing this consistent push for ID cards despite the population, the opposition parties, ex-security service leaders, employers/businesses being against it and costs for the scheme ballooning into many many billions of pounds- no logical or reasoned thought would lead to the conclusion that continuing such a scheme is a good idea.

    One final note is that a few weeks back David Cameron mentioned that if the Conservative party made it into power next that he would appoint someone from the creative industry to be in charge of deciding the UK's broadband future. One has to wonder what on earth the logic behind that is when he could choose someone from the technology industry. That coupled with his speech to the BPI a couple of years ago that was full of ignorance and many other comments and events through the past few years along similar lines are a pretty good demonstration that David Cameron and the Conservatives are strongly tied to big media. I do not think Labour is any different judging by their actions. So one thing is for sure, their actions and comments in favour of big media over technology certainly add weight to the idea that yes, they have a much stronger lobby at very least or simply offer more "incentives" to MPs than technology does.

  38. Re:Why do the music cartels have so much influence by Aceticon · · Score: 1
    • Most celebrities work in Media (TV, Movies, Music)
    • Politicians like to be seen/endorsed with/by celebrities
    • Most voters are dumb enough to let themselves be influenced by the glam that surrounds celebrities

    With the notable exception of Bill Gates (because he's filthy rich and does good charity work) and Steve Jobs (because Apple is as much a fashion company as a technology one) there is nobody in the technology sphere that has anywhere the celebrity power of most media stars.

  39. Heh, by msimm · · Score: 1

    I think you forgot Russia. I expect they'll have to cut off .ru and .cz, just to be thorough.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  40. Finally! by msimm · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Someone's finally just thinking of the children. Too bad that seems to include all of Ireland, but that's a small price to pay for safety!

    --
    Quack, quack.
  41. Re:Why do the music cartels have so much influence by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

    I think Europe tends to follow the United States in terms of policies. I would imagine it's because the trading with the US is so important, they want to stay on the good side of the US. Also, there's probably a strong lobby in Europe as well.

    The music industry's war against its consumers is a guaranteed losing battle. We have already decided that music costs too much and we are refusing to pay their artificially high prices. They can either change or die. They chose to die. So this is just their attempt to survive.

  42. Similar crap in New Zealand by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    http://creativefreedom.org.nz/blackout-homepage.html Check that page out, follow the links. Maybe Ireland can start a similar movement.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  43. Are you from Ireland? by PinkyDead · · Score: 4, Informative

    You must be to describe IRMA so prefectly.

    It must be noted, however, that IRMA is fighting to protect the meagre incomes of people like U2 and Enya - who are all just managing to survive with one castle each.

    Sarcasm aside, due to the fact that musicians have a tax exemption (cos lord knows U2 need it) - there are unfortunately a lot of them here, and they also have great wadges of cash. This in turn makes IRMA far more powerful than it should be.

    I still don't think the other ISPs are just going to rollover - Eircom is a joke. They are largest because they were originally a monopoly - and there is a large number of users that are slow to change.

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    1. Re:Are you from Ireland? by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling they'll be quick to change now...

    2. Re:Are you from Ireland? by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you have any idea how much money it takes each day just to feed a single U2 band member's ego? That's not chump change, my friend.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Are you from Ireland? by PinkyDead · · Score: 1

      Depends on which single band member we're talking about.

      You know who I mean: starts with B, ends with Oh No! and rhymes with shutthefuckupbonoyouselfabsorbedgit.

      --
      Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
  44. Shut down online file sharing if you can by morghanphoenix · · Score: 0

    but there will always be the sneakernet.

  45. Re:Why do the music cartels have so much influence by sakdoctor · · Score: 5, Funny

    We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in .com.fr,
    we shall fight on the web and on usenet,
    we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Internet, whatever the cost may be,
    we shall fight on the servers,
    we shall fight on port 443,
    we shall fight in the VPNs and on P2P,
    we shall fight in the darknets;
    we shall never surrender, and even if, which I do not for a moment believe, this Internet or a large part of it were subjugated and censored, then our digital Anarchy beyond the web, armed and guarded by thepiratebay fleet, would carry on the struggle, until, in good time, the New Internet, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old."

  46. To be fair by james.mcarthur · · Score: 1

    I hope that the block includes legitimate sources of music as well. After all, it wouldn't be fair just to block p2p to competitors^H^H^H^H^H^H^H err, "illegal" file sharing sites would it? Oh, what was that.. this isn't about justice..

  47. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eircom was privatised years ago, its the biggest ISP in ireland. no wonder it "caved" into legal threats, have you ever heard of Cartel monopolies?

    what eircom is doing is quite smart, their banning All (that they can find) file sharing sites and programs, and if you are caught 3 times downloading "illeagle music" they stop feeding you your connection,but still charge the contract.

    Basically to sum it up - their going to make alligations over their extreme high bandwith users,and since you cant appeal these alligations, they could cancel your service, and viola less server usage.

    I'll see you in court bitches.

    1. Re:Anonymous Coward by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      have you ever heard of Cartel monopolies?

            What, like the US Federal Reserve? :)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  48. Darwinism and Irish People by fluch · · Score: 1

    As a consequence Irish People will be the first to develope good skills in circumventing internet blocking. Easy to use software to get around those things will be developed there for the use of us all if ISP's around the world get into the habit to try the same nonsense. Hey! I love darwinism! :-)

  49. How about some counter-threats? by Kjella · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1. Find some reasonably popular band who is sharing, or is willing to promote their music on torrent sites.
    2. Throw out a little press, get a reasonably large number of people outside Ireland to download/seed.
    3. Sue the IRMA for tortious interference with contract, anti-trust, whatever shit you can make stick.
    4. Profit?

    Since it's not the government you can't really demand your rights from a private ISP but it seems to me that they're then also opening themselves up for lawsuits based on interference with business, something you couldn't do against a law.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:How about some counter-threats? by ladadadada · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Didn't Nine Inch Nails already do steps 1 and 2 ?

      I'm not Irish so I can't help you with step 3.

      --
      Sig matters not. Judge me by my sig, do you?
  50. Re:"Music sites." Really. by DrXym · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The problem I see here for Eircom, is once they cave into one group, what is their defence against other groups who wish to block sites? What if Scientology decides it wants Eircom to block Xenu.net and uses the same lame excuse that it might enable sharing of copyright materials? Or what about blocking usenet (and all conduits to obtain it) for all the potentially infringing or defamatory stuff there?

    Once they go down the road of blocking sites they can no longer make the perfectly reasonable defence that they're a service provider, not a censor. It *is* a slippery slope and only harm will come from it. If all ISPs give in, then the next thing will happen is the government will "helpfully" step in with a national firewall and force all providers to go through it. Internet access will become as repressive as it is in Australia or other countries that think they can control people by restricting what they can see.

    I'd add that sites like the pirate bay are service providers too. It may well be that most of their content is copyright infringing, but not all of it. Furthermore, they just host tracker files so Eircom isn't even preventing piracy by shutting off that site. It wouldn't surprise me either if distributed search, trackers and crypto make it extremely difficult for Eircom to EVER shut off piracy or say with certainty who is downloading the latest Ubuntu and who is just downloading the latest copy of Windows.

    By the way, does anyone know a decent and affordable VPN service in the US I can subscribe to?

  51. Thank God! by mangu · · Score: 1

    pretty soon the only thing you'll be able to post on the internet will be cat pictures

    You mean at least one website is still safe? So, the internet won't be entirely gone then?

  52. Re:Why do the music cartels have so much influence by tg123 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh God !!! Why did you have dig him up ???

    Never liked Churchill but why destroy such a great speech?

    heres a decent quote that fits the situation

    "Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear." --Harry S. Truman, message to Congress, August 8, 1950

  53. www.google.ie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No matter what you search, the result is always the same

  54. Re:Just to be clear, these are music STEALING site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just so you know, I am pretty sure no one listens to April Wine anymore.

    I know you're being funny (?), but April Wine is on the active playlist of every "classic rock" radio station here in Canada. So basically... lots of people listen to April Wine and you're wrong.

  55. I know you're half-joking, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...Ireland is one of the most conservative countries of western Europe. Remember that access to information about abortion thing? Apparently abortion isn't just still banned in Ireland, a situation which is by the way fairly representative of the general state of Irish law, but Ireland even tried (from 1983 to 1993) to ban access to information on abortion. Fortunately, it couldn't possibly work, not unless they would pull a China on us.

  56. they should block google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they should block google because that's how most people find music to swap.

  57. Re:Why do the music cartels have so much influence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't Bono dead?

  58. Counter sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the music business can sue ISPs for "damaging their business", the ISPs should counter sue because blocking filesharing is damaging their business (selling bandwidth)... Would be a fun trial...

  59. Re:Why do the music cartels have so much influence by Heddahenrik · · Score: 1

    The industry that prints CDs and DVDs is totally dependent on the monopoly given to them. Everyone suffering from this isn't so dependent. Therefore these monopolists will fight until their death, but people will not fight until their deaths about the right to use the last percentage of their own equipment.

    But it's your own fault. You have bought CDs and DVDs! Every time you do, a bit on the Internet and your computer is stolen from you.

    The end story is that we simply don't need CD and DVD-producers. The world would be far better off without them.

  60. This will work for sure! by muffen · · Score: 1
  61. Re:Just to be clear, these are music STEALING site by sleigher · · Score: 1

    They tour a lot too. I wish they would come to The Bay Area.

    --
    All points of time and space are connected.
  62. Re:Why do the music cartels have so much influence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trading with the US isn't as important as you might think. For the vast majority of cases it's easier and cheaper to trade within Europe or the East. Europe looks as if it's following the US but I think it's more a case of the West in general moving in the same direction as all the politicians want the same sorts of things. You'll probably even find that the US is following as many European leads as Europe follows US leads.

  63. Re:Why do the music cartels have so much influence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah but good luck finding an MP (or TD as we call them here) young enough to have had bono as a childhood hero. Most of them still think in shillings.

  64. Re:Why do the music cartels have so much influence by VShael · · Score: 1

    "Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear." --Harry S. Truman, message to Congress, August 8, 1950

    1950 eh? So this was around the time that the entire country went bug-nuts over rounding up and silencing the dreaded communists?

  65. So how do I get around whatever walls they put up? by fronto · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty much tech plebian who little of DNS switches and proxy ports. So how will I get around whatever screens the ISPs will inevitably put up? I'm with BT, who unlike Eircom haven't had a law suit brought against them and haven't had to filter anything yet - but the precedent Eircom have set kinda makes it an inevitability that they will. What tricks will I have to pull to still get to my darling torrents?

  66. Social Benefit used to fund DDoS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eircom today suffered yet another outage, due to the increasing dissatisfaction of their customers. Many customers, fraught at losing their access to websites which Eircom classify as 'file sharing' have been donating cash, some of which from Social Benefit to fund DDoS attacks on key parts of the Eircom network.
    When will the madness end?

  67. Irish Evil by ultranova · · Score: 1

    Totally useless and a mere inconvenience for the die-hard file swappers.

    But on the good side, it's the one story where it's appropriate to talk about Irish Evil ;).

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  68. Re:Why do the music cartels have so much influence by tg123 · · Score: 1

    "Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear." --Harry S. Truman, message to Congress, August 8, 1950

    1950 eh? So this was around the time that the entire country went bug-nuts over rounding up and silencing the dreaded communists?

    thinking about that not the best quote is it ?

    new quote .......

    "We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people."

    John F. Kennedy

    Hows that for a quote ?

    Blocking music swapping sites is internet censorship and thats what really worries me here. I mean following the Ideas/polices of Capitalist-Communist [thats a weird combo] China ???

  69. Re:Just to be clear, these are music STEALING site by sleigher · · Score: 1

    BTW, you should lighten up a little. Don't take my bad jokes about April Wine so personally. I wasn't aware people even remembered that band.

    --
    All points of time and space are connected.
  70. Blank Cheque Horay! by cheftw · · Score: 1

    If all the file sharing sites are blocked then whatever particular site a citizen is on could not be illegal. The illegal ones are blocked aren't they?

    Either they filter or they don't, and if there is a filter then what gets needn't be looked at.

    Btw, American posters, Ireland is a very different place in terms of how people see the law.

    --
    Always back up, never back down. ---- Think you're cool 'cos your uid is prime? Take mine, modulo the one digit integers
  71. Apologies to Frederick Weatherly by mudshark · · Score: 1

    Oh Download boy, the pipes, the pipes are crawling
    Eircom's gone and blocked the pirate sites
    No mp3s, and torrents are appalling
    'Tis all because of nutty IP rights.
    But come ye back armed with your faithful proxy
    Or simply find new URLs to parse.
    'Tis not the science of the flying rocket
    Oh Download boy, the law it is an arse.

    --
    In other news, astrophysicists have announced that they now know what all that dark matter is: it's stupidity.
  72. finally by adeelarshad82 · · Score: 1

    I'm glad someone is taking a step to stop piracy. People invest a lot of time and money on these things and I don't think its fair that their efforts go unawarded.

  73. Re:Why do the music cartels have so much influence by afxgrin · · Score: 1

    YAARRRR!!!!

  74. but its... by jaggeh · · Score: 1

    Eircom.... they are the most technically inept company in ireland. The only problem is that any isp that supplies a DSL service does so at the sufferance of eircom. Eircom networks still own 90% of the phone cabling in ireland, magnet is slowly chewing away at that margin but every other ISP may find the pages getting blocked too.

    --
    I would give everything i own for a little bit more.