Slashdot Mirror


Which Distro For an Eee PC?

An anonymous reader writes "I've got an Eee PC 1000HD, and frankly, I can't stand XP. I know it's odd, because I actually like Vista, but XP is such a giant piece of crap on here that I struggle to use it day-by-day. Anyway, my question is this: which Linux distro should I run on it? Plain Ubuntu just doesn't have driver support. I tried Ubuntu-eee, which, to put it bluntly, does not work for me at all (slow, terrible battery life, even worse interface). I've heard that Jaunty Jackalope is going to have better netbook support, but that's all the way in April! Is there a distro out now that will free me from XP's terribleness without being terrible itself?" Getting wireless working on an Eee PC (though in my experience imperfectly) with stock Ubuntu is possible; for me it took some googling, though I've been told with great enthusiasm that it actually works "out of the box." What distros are you running on your netbook, and what problems do you find?

64 of 466 comments (clear)

  1. XandrOS or EeeOS? by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative
    Disclaimer, I do not own an eeePC (keyboard too damn small) so I have not tried any of these things. Two things I found while searching around is the Linux OS that is shipped with the eeePC Linux versions and that is XandrOS, a debian based Linux. You need to torrent it I think to avoid some $10 bandwidth fee. So search on your favorite torrent site.

    Also there is EeeOS which claims to be:

    EeeOS is designed to be a minimalistic Custom Debian Distribution that provides a base system (drivers, system tools, Xorg) and nothing more. The idea behind such a release is so that users of Eee Linux OS can configure and build their own Eee experience ... an EeeXperience if you will :P While systems like Ubuntu, Fedora, Suse and Xandros are all amazing in their own right, they often come pre-configured and with a lot of bloat. Some power users prefer to have complete control over their systems and it is with these users in mind that Eee OS was created.

    I was going to go on a lengthy explanation about how you could use Slackware or Gentoo to provide the optimal configuration you are interested in but after reading your summary, I doubt you're interested in this sort of devotion to squeezing your eeePC like a lemon over your enemy's eye.

    ... though I've been told with great enthusiasm that it actually works "out of the box."

    Ubuntu has worked "out of the box" for two of my DLink WiFi cards. It worked on a no name CompUSA brand rebate PCMCIA card on my laptop but there were ... annoyances ... with lack of encryption options.

    Also, why did you go with an Eee Ubuntu and not Xubuntu ... which I guess would be more widely supported?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by evilkasper · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a eee701 I've found this to be a handy resource http://forum.eeeuser.com/index.php Mostly I run Xandros on mine, just for convenience. I do however have several distros on thumb drives in case I feel like a change. Just curious because I'm used to people complaining about Vista and how they like XP, what about XP do you not like? Again just curious.

    2. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Stormwatch · · Score: 3, Informative

      Xandros and Novell signed those sick "covenant not to sue" deals with Microsoft.

      So I'll sign a covenant not to touch their crap with a barge pole.

    3. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just so you know ... EeePC 1000 keyboards are only 10% smaller than normal size.

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by jon3k · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually it's like 7-8% smaller, they're 92% or 93% sized keyboards. Also the 901HA (or one of the 900 series) has the larger keyboard as well.

    5. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Tetsujin · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 904 is the same size as the 1000 series, but with a 9" screen. Probably that's the one you're thinking of.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    6. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by kimvette · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're just small enough to throw off touch typing.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    7. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have an eee701 myself, and I played with several Linux OS's on it, but kept coming back to Xandros as well.

      There's apparently a guy who has an ongoing project to take the original Asus distribution of Xandros for eeePC and tweak, update and improve it.

      Links to his latest builds can be found over at http://www.xepc.org/en. (Unfortunately for me, the site is basically a blog written in Chinese, that gets run through a translator when you ask for the English version with the /en on the end of the URL. So it's still hard to read at times.)

      It doesn't look like he's posted anything new since the end of 2008 ... but if I understand it correctly, he's saying his last build of his customized Xandros was submitted to Asus to become an official update image at some point in the near future.

    8. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Zordak · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Typing this on a 904HA, which I've had for three or four weeks. The only thing that really throws off my typing is the right shift key. I don't know who made that design choice, but it was stupid. If not for that, it would be pretty much perfect. I paid $350 for the thing, including shipping, and it's perfect for using on the bus or plane when a regular laptop is just too cumbersome.

      I wiped the second partition and added FC 10, which worked out of the box, including wireless.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    9. Re:XandrOS or EeeOS? by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If he wants Jaunty so much why doesn't he just use it? It's not officially released yet but obviously it exists. There are daily builds available for download.

  2. Ubuntu by DesertBlade · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ubuntu makes a nice EEE distro.

    But since you like Vista there may be nothing we can do.

    --
    Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
    1. Re:Ubuntu by metallicagoaltender · · Score: 4, Interesting

      +1 on Ubuntu. I picked up an Eee 1000H this past weekend and installing Easy Peasy (the poorly named Ubuntu Eee distro) via flash drive was ridiculously easy. Everything worked right off the bat without any messing around with config files. The "Netbook Remix" interface is sort of annoying, but very easy to turn off.

    2. Re:Ubuntu by onecheapgeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anyway, my question is this: which Linux distro should I run on it? Plain Ubuntu just doesn't have driver support. I tried Ubuntu-eee, which, to put it bluntly, does not work for me at all (slow, terrible battery life, even worse interface). I've heard that Jaunty Jackalope is going to have better netbook support, but that's all the way in April! Is there a distro out now that will free me from XP's terribleness without being terrible itself?

      Brilliant advice. Really, you are a model of reading comprehension.

    3. Re:Ubuntu by OolimPhon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not so. My son got a 901 and the wired network worked out of the box. For the wireless, about 5 minutes googling found us the answer - a misconfiguration problem that updating a config file (I forget which one - this was 6 months ago) fixed.

  3. eeebuntu by IMarvinTPA · · Score: 4, Informative

    You may wish to try http://www.eeebuntu.org/ which is NOT the same as Ubuntu-eee.

    It has worked decently on my 1000HD.

    IMarv

    1. Re:eeebuntu by oodaloop · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seconded. I'm using it right now on my EEE 900HA. I'm using the Netbook remix, which I really like so far. It's the standard Ubuntu load, plus a netbook interface over the desktop. Looks cool too.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:eeebuntu by lt.+slock · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'll second that. I've been using eeebuntu base on my 901 happily enough, battery life seems to be about 5 hours.

    3. Re:eeebuntu by theaceoffire · · Score: 5, Informative

      Like the others, I too support this version.

      Not only does it work well, but it remembers your Wifi settings and doesn't pester you, so that when you walk close enough to one setting you set up before it will auto connect...

      When I go from home to work, It swaps networks automatically.

      --
      I steal signatures. This one used to be yours.
    4. Re:eeebuntu by pmbasehore · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use eeebuntu as well on my EEE 1000. I'm normally not a big *buntu fan, but this has exceeded all of my expectations. It took a little bit of fiddling to get my hotkeys to work, but that would be true of any laptop on any distro.

      Works a darnsight better than that crap Xandros bastardization they OEM'ed it with!

      --
      $> man woman $> Segmentation fault. (Core dumped)
    5. Re:eeebuntu by jaaron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another +1 for eeebuntu here. Has worked great.

      --
      Who said Freedom was Fair?
    6. Re:eeebuntu by Tetsujin · · Score: 4, Funny

      You may wish to try http://www.eeebuntu.org/ which is NOT the same as Ubuntu-eee.

      It has worked decently on my 1000HD.

      IMarv

      Ah... Not to be confused with The People's Front of Judea!

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  4. Xubuntu by jfbilodeau · · Score: 2, Informative

    For what it's worth, I've been running Xubuntu on my Eee ever since I got it. 100% happy with it, and used it to develop a little control panel for my Eee PC using Anjuta.

    http://chronogears.com/2008/04/control-panel-for-eee-pc.html

    J-F

    --
    Goodbye Slashdot. You've changed.
    1. Re:Xubuntu by Fungii · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm the same, I've got Xubuntu and compiz running and it's perfect, get some minimal window decorations and you're sorted.

      Just do a standard installation, then head over to http://www.array.org/ and follow the instructions to install the kernel which will get your wireless and hotkeys working.

      http://www.eeeuser.com/ is an excellent forum if you have any more questions. There are a few threads there that have step by step guides to installing and configuring Xubuntu, but there really isn't much to it beyond getting a custom kernel.

  5. Easy Peasy by EverStoned · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Easy Peasy by mollymoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bootup time is a concern for the Celeron based Eees because sleep sucks so much power, but for anything else (including the Atom-based Eees) I just can't see any need to boot regularly enough for 30 seconds to matter. Just use sleep. I've never heard of a distribution which can boot to any desktop on any machine faster than Ubuntu wakes from sleep on my Eee (6 seconds, which feels glacial if your last laptop was a Mac).

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  6. You're best bet by Dishwasha · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you're struggling to use Windows XP on a daily basis, perhaps you should try something like this laptop. I'm certain you will find yourself struggling just as much and see just as much bloat with any kind of GNU/Linux distribution, so this can really cut down on the learning curve and usability issues.

    1. Re:You're best bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      this laptop [amazon.com]

      Pfft, I've installed BSD on one of those. It was easier than the toaster, as this at least has a keyboard.

      I was stumped by the dead badger though, but it is rumoured to be possible.

      I hear once you get BSD running on a badger you really have earned your stripes.

  7. Windows 7 by heffrey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you like vista why not stick windows 7 on it?

    1. Re:Windows 7 by wicka · · Score: 3, Informative

      First off, I submitted this, my bad on forgetting to put in a name. The reason I can't use 7 is because the 1000HD graphics chipset doesn't support Aero, and using Vista/7 without Aero basically renders the OS useless (especially in the case of 7, where the vast majority of the new GUI features require Aero). I was trying to be concise in the submission so I didn't want to get off in a tangent about how pissed I am that Intel refuses to write WDDM drivers for the GMA 900.

  8. What driver issues? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Informative

    What about the Eee 1000HA had hardware driver support issues?

    The Intel Atom restricts the platform enough that there's very little hardware variance between units. WiFi and card readers are about the only thing that varies. I know the Atheros WiFi chipset used in the Aspire One series has some issues with "out of the box" Ubuntu support, but if you connect once via wired Ethernet you can apt-get a package that includes drivers that work. See the ath5k entry in the release notes - http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/810

    The only hardware issues I've had with my Acer Aspire One and vanilla Ubuntu were:
    1) The above wifi issue
    2) Kubuntu's initial Bluetooth issues, this was resolved in the latest round of KDE updates. (This was with a third-party BT dongle, and KDE Bluetooth support was entirely broken on all systems with recent kernels.)
    3) Um... I think that's it?

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  9. Re:Which distro? Debian. by stevey · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seconded.

    I've been running Debian's Lenny release upon my Eee PC for the past few months. Everything works, from the power buttons, sound, video, camera, wireless.

    The only instructions I used were those on the wiki you link to.

    Still this question is going to receive the obvious replies - everybody will suggest the distribution they know and like the best (the two are often the same).

    I'd say "try a few, choose your favourite", but I suspect the better thing to do would just be to pick what you're using elsewhere, or whatever local people are using. Then if you have problems you'll have people to ask.

  10. eeebuntu by iTowelie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So far I have tried the following operating systems in this order:

    vLited Vista Home
    Ubuntu eee
    eeebuntu Standard
    nLited XP
    eeebuntu NetBookRemix.

    Just last night I switched back from XP to eeebuntu 2.0 NBR. Why? Well, it just works beautifully OOTB with my 701SD and the GUI works well with the 7" screen. All I had to do was edit my fstab to automatically mount my Airdisk and media shares on my Vista box and that was that. I use it to browse the web, edit/view spreadsheets and to remote into some of my home computers. ZSNES is also a crucial download.

    I honestly don't really notice the battery drain. If I want to compute for 2+ hours, I will use my desktop to avoid sore wrists by using the 701SD's small keyboard.

  11. Wait by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Funny

    You like Vista, but dislike XP?

    What's it like in your parallel universe? Can I visit?

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:Wait by MrZaius · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's like the event logs suddenly became human readable, the shell started to suck less, and a KDE-like start menu started letting me just type in what I want without navigating the typical Windows Start Menu hell. It's harder than you might think to go back to XP after a substantial period of time on an optimized Vista install.

      Not that there's any way at all that I'll defend its astoundingly slow file transfers and deletion speeds, after a service-pack and years of patches. Still, it works well enough in-game and does have some strong points from an administrator's perspective, given modern hardware and well-written drivers. (Albeit not well enough to get me to use it more than 20% of the time.)

    2. Re:Wait by greg_barton · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's it like in your parallel universe?

      In his universe Spock has no beard.

      How fucked up is that?

    3. Re:Wait by LordEd · · Score: 5, Funny

      In his universe, objects in Soviet Russia don't actually do anything to you.

      Old people and young people use things in North Korea.

      Scientists have solved the ??? and have profited.

      The anti-spam solution checklist has (x) That's a great idea. You solved it!

  12. I'm sorry to the XP-hater by commodore64_love · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't take seriously someone who claims he loves Vista AND considers XP to be crap.

    I can kinda, sorta understood someone liking Vista's pretty new interface, but I've been using XP for 7 years now, and it's far from being crap. It's the most stable OS I've ever used, second only to the Mac OS. Vista on the other hand..... I can't even get it to play video on cnn.com or foxnews.com. It's not the worst OS I've ever used (Windows 3 was worse), but it's still pretty sad.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    1. Re:I'm sorry to the XP-hater by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can't take seriously someone who claims he loves Vista AND considers XP to be crap.

      I can kinda, sorta understood someone liking Vista's pretty new interface, but I've been using XP for 7 years now, and it's far from being crap. It's the most stable OS I've ever used, second only to the Mac OS. Vista on the other hand..... I can't even get it to play video on cnn.com or foxnews.com. It's not the worst OS I've ever used (Windows 3 was worse), but it's still pretty sad.

      The OP certainly has weird taste in somehow hating XP but liking Vista. They're not that different. XP is stable, and Vista is more stable. Vista is faster for most daily tasks (remember that our /. story showing 7 faster than XP in something like 19 of 22 tasks also showed Vista faster than XP in most tasks). Vista is slower for disk manipulation, which is baffling. They're equivalent for gaming - Vista is no longer any slower, but DX10 is still useless. Vista doesn't slow down over time like XP did, though this was never a problem for knowledgeable users anyway.

      There's no difference between the two in playing videos from cnn or that other place. The least computer literate people I know, people who can't understand what a pixel is, what a network connection is, or that there's a difference between a "computer" and "software" can do that with absolutely no problem.

      Your sig is stupid, btw.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  13. Ubuntu 8.10 + Netbook Remix by GweeDo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a Dell Mini 9 that I run stock Ubuntu 8.10 + the Netbook Remix interface on and love it. There is a good 3-4GB left on the 8GB SSD even with OpenOffice 3 and a few other bigger apps.

  14. Re:I'm sorry to the reality-hater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I can't take seriously someone who wants to watch videos on foxnews.com.

  15. I recommend... by n3tcat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Windows 7. I'm sure it would rate the performance of your EEE PC in the 3.5 range.

  16. Re:don't want to sound elitist by agrounds · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think I speak for all of slashdot when I say this.

    No, you really don't. You just speak for judgmental, obnoxious pricks that believe the world should operate only according to their narrow-minded rules. People like you are the reason linux only enjoys a 1.2% marketshare.

    A lot of us actually would like to see better market penetration and a system that is universally accessible and enjoyed by users of all proficiency levels. This is a requirement for the big software houses to want to port their products to *nix.

  17. mandriva 2009.0 by marros · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a MSI wind and installed Mandriva 2009.0 and everything worked from the start. The hardware on the wind is almost the same as the eePC, and Mandriva was designed with netbooks in mind.

  18. Use? by mattpm · · Score: 2, Informative

    What exactly are you using your EeePC for? If you are simply using it for email and internet I don't see how XP can be so frustrating. I use XP on my 901 and it works like a charm for what is essentially surfing, msn (with miranda client of course) and taking lecture notes. I find the secret to increased usability and efficiency with XP on a small screen is to disable all desktop icons, move the taskbar to the top and keep your start menu organized.

  19. Stock Ubuntu by jalefkowit · · Score: 5, Informative

    I found stock Ubuntu Intrepid with a few tweaks to be easier to set up and more pain-free than any of the "easy/tuned" distros are. Once I had everything working (including wireless), I wrote up a HOWTO explaining how to go from bare metal to a fully working system so that others wouldn't have to go digging through a dozen forums to find the info. Check it out, might be all you need to get up and going.

  20. wifi drivers, atheros and ralink by bcrowell · · Score: 3, Informative

    I bought a Eee, with Linux preinstalled to give to my wife for her birthday last week. The wifi didn't work. Called Asus tech support, and they figured out that the problem was that the machine had an RaLink wifi card, but the only one they had working drivers for was Atheros. They weren't able to offer any solution other than returning it, so I did.

    Since they have RaLink on some of their machines, and they say they don't have working Linux drivers for RaLink, it sounds like some of the Windows versions have RaLink, and therefore the OP should check that before trying to switch to Linux.

    If you look at the Amazon reviews for the model I bought, you'll see a lot of people complaining that they bought the Linux version, installed Windows, and then Windows didn't work right. On all of those, I clicked the "NO" link next to "Was this review helpful to you?," because that's just silly. If you want Windows, you buy the Windows version. Installing an OS on a desktop tends to be a hassle, doing it on a standard notebook has many more pitfalls, and doing it on a netbook is even more difficult to get right. It's pretty silly that these people are blaming Asus when essentially they just bought the wrong model.

    The OP seems to be making the same mistake, but in reverse, which seems even less sensible to me. It means that MS is getting a Windows tax from him for an OS he doesn't like and isn't going to use. Great way to support an illegal monopoly when you didn't even have to, as well as creating huge hassles for yourself. My advice at this point would be either to return it if he can, or sell it on eBay, and then buy one with Linux preinstalled.

    BTW, a little googling will show that a lot of people are receiving Eees with nonfunctional wifi. I'm really looking forward to the day when Linux-based desktop and laptop machines are so cheap and good that it puts MS out of business. Unfortunately, that day hasn't come yet. The quality just isn't there yet. I've bought PCs with Linux preinstalled from a variety of vendors (Great Quality, WalMart, Asus) over the last 5 years or so. The best that ever happened was that the hardware was fine but the version of Linux that came preinstalled (ThizLinux, gOS) was lousy, so I wiped the disk and installed something else (FreeBSD, Ubuntu). The worst that ever happened was this experience with the Eee.

    1. Re:wifi drivers, atheros and ralink by cide · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's the rule of thumb I've followed... however I've only tested this with the Linux version. (I wasn't aware that Windows EeePC 901s use Atheros)

      EeePC ==701SD: Realtek Wifi
      EeePC <900A: Atheros Wifi
      EeePC >=901: RaLink Wifi

      As a result, the modules, depending on the version of Linux you're using varies.

      Atheros Wifi on <=2.6.24: ath_pci (madwifi) external driver
      Atheros Wifi on >=2.6.26: ath5k internal driver
      RaLink Wifi on < 2.6.28: rt2860sta external driver
      RaLink Wifi on > 2.6.28: rt2860sta internal driver*
      Realtek Wifi on < 2.6.28: rtl8187se external driver
      Realtek Wifi on > 2.6.29: rtl8187se internal driver

      * Heres the crux, as of 2.6.28, the rt2860sta internal driver uses version 1.8.0.0, but this version has broken WPA/WPA2 support. If you somehow ended up with 1.7.0.0, it too has broken WPA/WPA2 support.

      However, rt2860sta v1.7.1.1 appears to be good.

      I've been working on porting the changes introduced in v1.7.1.1 into v1.8.x.x for 2.6.29. So far it works for me, but I still need to submit this as a patch into the kernel:

      http://git.array.org/?p=kernel/stable/linux-2.6-stable.git;a=commit;h=ee8834f5551943b7bd2db49bbad9ba3c24ce6f67

    2. Re:wifi drivers, atheros and ralink by cide · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think this is the reason why the eeepc and other netbooks have been so cheap.

      They tend to use newer hardware components that do not have a track record for rock-solid support in linux and windows. Manufacturers (Asus isn't the only one) select bids from the vendors with the lowest price.

      Its not a coincidence that other non-Asus products end up with similar wifi/ethernet cards as Asus (Acer Aspire One, MSI Wind specifically), and thus have the exact same problems in support on linux.

      What makes this rt2860 driver particularly unusual is that there are existing internal (community supplied) Linux kernel drivers for other ralink hardware available, but this rt2860 deviates from them so much, existing drivers useless for this hardware.

      Coupled with the fact that Ralink has done such a poor job with version control, IMHO, (See reasons #2 and #3 above) it only causes endless greif for someone who automatically assumes that the latest version is always the greatest.

      "Huh?.. rt2860 v1.8.0.0 doesn't contain anything fixed from v1.7.1.1?? But its got a higher number! WTF?"

  21. Mandriva 2009.1 by edit0r · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mandriva 2009.1 everything works out of the box

  22. Wireless by Nutty_Irishman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you replace the wireless card with an intel based wireless card, you should have no problems with any linux distro. I replaced my wireless card on my MSI Wind with the Intel 3945 and have no problems in linux http://www.google.com/products?q=intel+PRO+3945

  23. HP MIE by sam.haskins · · Score: 2, Informative

    The HP "Mobile Internet Experience" Distro, designed to be only used on their netbooks, but _excellent_ on others, including my Lenovo S10 is my recommendation. You install it by using HP's "recovery usb key" tool :) Get it at http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/softwareList?os=2020&lc=en&dlc=en&cc=us&product=3860346# It's very usuable, and fits right into the idea of a personal device as a resource to you. Plus, it's Ubuntu underneath, so you can add whatever you want :)

  24. ArchLinux? by lwsimon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm planning on using ArchLinux when I get mine. They seem to have good community support, and it doesn't come with any fluff you don't need.

    It is a bit more difficult to install, though.

    --
    Learn about Photography Basics.
    1. Re:ArchLinux? by killeena · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I installed Arch on my 701, and I have been really happy with it so far. I only have what I need installed on it, and the thing boots in like 20 seconds. There is actually a good article in the works on the Arch wiki on how to set it up on the eee. There are custom kernels that are ready to go and everything. If you know your way around linux good enough, I would recommend giving it a try.

      --
      Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices. -Theodor Adorno
    2. Re:ArchLinux? by Kadoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The latest archlinux ftp install worked without custom kernel on my 701, wifi and all. The img file makes it easy to install on the cd-less computer.

    3. Re:ArchLinux? by polemistes · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you want an optimized system, Arch Linux is not more difficult than any other distro. You just don't have the choice to install a complete desktop system with lots and lots of things you don't want, configured in ways you don't like, so that you can uninstall almost everything and then install what you want, from obscure package repos, so you get library confusions etc, for then to reconfigure almost everything, so it works the way you like it to.

      The Arch Linux installer lets you:

      1. Install a very basic system
      2. Configure the most important things in one simple configuration file (or a few more if you want or need to)

      Then you boot into your basic system and:

      1. Update your system with one command
      2. Install the programs you need. The package manager will take care of all dependencies.
      3. Configure them the way you want them
      4. Enjoy!

      Of course, I agree, this is more difficult than letting someone else make all the choices for you.

      By the way, I use Arch Linux on a Eee 901, and it works perfectly. There are some tricks to speed it up. Mounting the /tmp and /var/log and /var/tmp as a ram disk makes it a lot more responsive. Turning off disk cache in firefox is also a good idea.
      Driver support isn't a problem for me at least. Everything works. You might need to install a customized kernel package for the wireless card, but from 2.6.29 there will be support for the card in the kernel (This is for the 901, I don't know about the 1000HD).

  25. Why? by darthservo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I realize that there is some intent of humor behind the post, but really why would it be so hard to believe that someone actually gave Vista a serious look as opposed to having a blog-formed bias against it before using it? Yes, XP is not "giant piece of crap" but Vista is better.

    Sorry, I'm just tired of hearing crap flung against Vista when people don't give it a serious look. I look forward to Windows 7 for somewhat similar reasons as the Vista-haters - we won't hear any more about Vista. But the difference is that I'm hoping it will take the bias away as well.

    --

    Prove it.

  26. Re:Ubuntu - Easy Peasy by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have the Asus 1000 (solid state drive) and use Easy Peasy (I think www.geteasypeasy.com). It works well with suspend/lid closing/wifi. I don't know if this is typical, but it even worked correctly with my Verizon Wireless EVDO aircard, so I'm happy.

  27. Abandon all hope by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you truly prefer Vista to XP, then the only course of action I can recommend for you is euthanasia.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  28. Re:don't want to sound elitist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "You just speak for judgmental, obnoxious pricks that believe the world should operate only according to their narrow-minded rules."

    Like he said, he speaks for all of slashdot.

  29. Vanilla Ubuntu + Adamm's kernel by lolocaust · · Score: 3, Informative

    On my eeePC 901, I'm using the standard Ubuntu 8.10 install and then using a wired connection I have installed Adamm's kernel which fixes all the hardware issues. The instructions are simple to follow and are available at http://array.org/ubuntu/ (if you can use apt-get you can follow these instructions).

    --
    Why does my post history abruptly stop? I want to laugh at the stupid things I posted as a kid.
    1. Re:Vanilla Ubuntu + Adamm's kernel by don.g · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thirded! Most (all?) rehashes of Ubuntu for the Eee break things in fundamental ways, such that things like upgrading the kernel break your machine. The array.org method does things the right way (proper packages, proper repository), and things don't break.

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
  30. FreeBSD by sremick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not bad for a "dead" OS:

    http://wiki.freebsd.org/AsusEee

  31. I'm glad you asked! by malevolentjelly · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, I've been fooling with a much smaller and lower-end Eee over the last week or so (the $200 900a), and I'm just brimming with nasty experiences to share.

    First and foremost- if you are a fan of Windows and your Eee has a non-SSD HDD, you really need to be using Windows 7. They are still passing out serial numbers and the disk images themselves are easy to find on bittorrent sites. It's honestly fantastic. Everything you like about Vista is just better in Windows 7 and most of what you didn't like is gone- plus the performance, damn.

    Second, let's talk linux: running Linux on the EeePC is a real Monkey's paw sort of experience. With every upside is a cruel and awful downside-- and such. For instance, you can run Ubuntu Netbook Remix which uses Intel's LPIA architecture instead of i386-- that's really cool because it does a lot of static scheduling (I believe) and SSE3 optimization that is really great for the Atom processor... but it's not going to support you hardware perfectly. It's an OEM product so no time has been devoted to working out issues with the Asus ACPI. Basically, you're supposed to be paying Canonical for a working branded experience like HP and Dell did... unless you feel like doing the work yourself.

    Easy Peasy 1.0 has all the hardware support down, but once more you're going to be running Ubuntu Netbook Remix's interface. I mean, let's face it- The EeePC 1000 is not just a device, it's a full computer. You probably want to treat it like an actual system not a toy. UNR's interface is really attention deficit and designed for serial single-tasking. Besides, I like to stay away from custom spins and stay on the mainline to receive better support and more timely upgrades/security updates. I'd rather not my system's health be dependent on some random stranger's freetime.

    Honestly, you need to look into Mandriva. It's a fantastic and very pretty home distribution with full official support for the EeePC. I would recommend keeping a tiny FreeDOS partition (or usb key) around for bios updates, which come pretty frequently and often work in concert with system updates on Mandriva. You really should try it-- it might be just what you're looking for if you want solid support and to avoid headaches. Furthermore, if you want to get really creative you can always set up a custom system with LXDE-- I can link to a guide if anyone asks.

    Personally, I run Asus Xandros on my machine with unionfs disabled to conserve diskspace (I only have 4 gb!). It's a well adjusted distribution with full support for the ACPI and a great CPU frequency profile. Also, it comes with all the codecs you'll need and uses all mplayer by default (no gstreamer, no pulseaudio-- simple and practical). The only downside (on the 900a) is that the touchpad's tap functionality is just awful when using the elantech X driver. I am not sure if it would be the same case on a 1000. If you want the Xandros distribution, you can probably torrent it- it doesn't use CD keys or anything.

    Alternatively, you could also try HP's MIE image (Mobile Internet Experience). It's pretty close to an Eee 1000, so just get the support tool from HP that's designed to make a "recovery image" for you and just "recover" your EeePC. That's a custom spin of UNR + software and codecs-- not a bad way to go.

    So, in conclusion:

    1. Windows 7 (as supported as Vista)
    2. Xandros (if you have it) (fully supported)
    3. Mandriva 2009.0 (Gnome) (fully supported)
    4. HP MIE (possibly supported)
    5. Ubuntu Netbook Remix (partially supported)
    6. Easy Peasy 1.0 (fully supported but crappy)

    And there ya go.

  32. Re:don't want to sound elitist by tprime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why did you feed the troll??

    I am a beginner to intermediate level desktop user of Linux who is getting ready to buy a Samsung NC10 netbook and plan on dual booting it with ubuntu. I am COUNTING on the linux community to help me along the way. From what I have seen, it isn't assholes like the AC who keep linux from getting any traction, it is the overwhelming amount of information out there about the 'alternative' free OS. The linux user community and their willingness to help others is the reason that it is UP to 1.2%

    These cheap netbooks will keep the % going up.

    --
    http://www.tomandemily.com