Slashdot Mirror


Testing Lenovo's ThinkPad W700ds Dual-Screen Notebook

MojoKid writes "Lenovo's ThinkPad W700 is a unique product, targeted squarely at mobile professionals who require the power, features, and performance of workstation-class product in a notebook. The machine has a few stand-out integrated features, like a Wacom Digitizer Tablet and X-Rite Color Calibrator. In addition, the ThinkPad W700ds version and adds a secondary, slide-out 10.6" WXGA+ display, which increases monitor real-estate by 39% spanning across its two panels. HotHardware's video demonstrates the machine's arsenal of toys for the graphics pro, in a somewhat portable desktop replacement notebook."

197 comments

  1. Well by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As usual, Portability = $$$$$$$$$

    I'm sitting in front of a hand built desktop that runs at 3.2 Ghz (Lenovo runs at 2.53) with 4 gigs of RAM and a terrabyte of hard disk space. I'm using an IBM model M keyboard (long live the king!) with dual 27" monitors from Dell, with S-IPA panels.

          Total cost? about 2 grand, and I put together the CPU unit 2 years ago.

    1. Re:Well by abhi_beckert · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, so your system is cheaper. But that's a *quad core* 2.53Ghz machine of the latest architecture. It's pretty damn fast. And the hard drives are 7,200 RPM and they're running on RAID 0, which is also very fast.

      Plus it has a bunch of features yours is probably lacking:
        - webcam
        - fingerprint scanner
        - Wacom tablet
        - VGA/DualLink DVI/DisplayPort
        - Display Calibrator
        - FireWire
        - Express/Smart Card expansion
        - WiFi/Bluetooth
        - Not to mention... fits in your backpack

      All in all, that thing isn't too bad a price for a truly mobile workstation. But it has a pretty small target market.

    2. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow I feel like you aren't telling us all the specs for an equal comparison.

      Newegg, Quad-Core 3.2 GHz processors I get two listed, one for $1000, one for $1550.
      (Desktop Processor - Filters on were Quad-Core, and every processor speed greater and equal to 3.2 GHz ) (If I turn on all the speeds from 2.5 up I get prices from $150-$1550)

      Somehow I doubt you spent only $2000 for a 3.2 GHz machine. Unless you might be running a single or dual core, lower graphics, etc?
      (Article is for a Quad-core (core 2 extreme) 2.53 GHz CPU, GFX: Quadro FX 3700 (which linked Evaluation says is the basis of the GF 9800 cards) )

    3. Re:Well by Forge · · Score: 3, Informative

      Let's look again at those features.


      - webcam -:$20.

      - fingerprint scanner -: $35
      - Wacom tablet -: $79
      - VGA/DualLink DVI/DisplayPort -: Probably already in a $2K desktop.
      - Display Calibrator -: Never seen this on desktop or Laptop before, don't know how well it works.
      - FireWire -: Probably already in a $2K desktop.
      - Express/Smart Card expansion -: 5 in 1 multicard reader. $15
      - WiFi/Bluetooth -: USB Bluetooth and PCI WiFi -: $30 total
      - Not to mention... fits in your backpack -: Back to the grand parent's point that "the extra cost really is just for mobility."

      $2,179 is still a hell of a lot cheaper than $6,209.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    4. Re:Well by abhi_beckert · · Score: 1

      $6,209 is the demo model. Actual prices start at "just over $3000", but I can't find what features you get for that.

    5. Re:Well by Anpheus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Intel's new Core i7 920 can be overclocked to 3.2GHz with the stock cooler (and without voiding the warranty,) and go much higher on marginally more expensive coolers. 3.8GHz easily on a $40 heatsink and fan, 4.0 GHz if you opt for the extremely high end heatsinks, 4.2 GHz I've seen on water running stable. And on more exotic coolers, you can hit 4.5-5.0 GHz.

      I imagine that is similar to his situation. The Core i7 costs $290 right now or so, and can easily beat the older Core 2 based $1550 processor you found in most benchmarks. Especially anything that hits the memory, as my i7 can hit 18GB/s (big B) to RAM. That's two and a half times what Intel's dual-QX9775 "Skulltrail" platform can do.

      My entire machine cost lest than that QX9775, by the way.

    6. Re:Well by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 0, Redundant

      If you had the skills to hand build a 3.2GHz CPU, I think you should be able to afford something more portable than a desk side furnace.

    7. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly they're talking about some shitty old Pentium 4.

      It's going to take awhile to beat the "HIGHER NUMBER = FASTER" bullshit out of people, when it comes to hertz.

    8. Re:Well by BrokenHalo · · Score: 4, Funny

      - Not to mention... fits in your backpack

      ...which you have to carry in a wheelbarrow (*not supplied). :-)

    9. Re:Well by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      $6,209 is the demo model. Actual prices start at "just over $3000", but I can't find what features you get for that.

      A one year discount pass to your local chiropractor.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    10. Re:Well by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't surprise me if he has an Intel E8500 or something such, but then he says two years old so who knows.

    11. Re:Well by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 1

      Seriously. 11 pounds?!? I complain about my old laptop and it's only 7 or 8 pounds.

    12. Re:Well by MrMista_B · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Alright, now take it down to Starbucks to work on stuff while you have a coffee.

      So much for boasting about '2 grand', huh? I agree with your point, but there are uses for expensive, portable computers, even uses that justify spending that kind of money.

    13. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Winning an argument on the internet -: Priceless.

    14. Re:Well by Zerth · · Score: 1

      A display calibrator is US$30-60

    15. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok so you have a 3.2GHz CPU, 4GB of memory, a 1TB hard drive and dual 27" displays. What kind of CPU, RAM, HDD and GPU do you have?

      I bought a laptop a couple months ago. It has a C2D 2.26Ghz, 4GB DDR3 memory, 360GB 7200 RPM SATA2 hard drive, Geforce 9600M GT GPU with 512MB GDDR3 memory, 18.4" 1920x1080 display, Dolby Surround 5.1 speaker system (5 speakers + subwoofer built into the laptop), DVD burner, full size keyboard with keypad, integrated webcam, fingerprint reader, 6 in 1 flash card reader, 3 USB, 1 eSATA/USB, HDMI, VGA and display ports. Cost, $1150. Add in the cost of my 1TB external eSATA hard drive and it's $1250.

      Excluding the dual 27" displays and assuming you are only using a single core CPU (since you didn't specify, it's logical), it sounds like my laptop beats your desktop in performance, power economy and portability. However, if I throw in 2 28" displays that adds another $700 ($350 each). The total cost would then be $1950, about the same as your cost except my setup would have 3 displays (2 of which would be larger), presumably better CPU, more HDD space, all of the other extras AND still be portable.

      I'm not trying to out e-peen your computer, I'm just saying that portability doesn't have to mean $$$. If you know what to look for and shop around, you can get great deals. The only reason this new Lenovo costs so much is exactly that, because it's a new implementation of technology.

    16. Re:well by bignetbuy · · Score: 1

      Horseshit. Lenovo still gets service/support through IBM. Try calling them instead of bitching on slashdot. I called them at 4:30pm on a Wednesday about a bad DIMM. They had a replacement sitting on my desk at 8:30am the following morning.

    17. Re:Well by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      That's why I said "CPU unit"...it's a legitimate term to describe the big black noisy box near my feet that contains all the guts of the computer. I know the CPU is actually just one chip in the box, but a lot of people call the whole box the CPU.

    18. Re:Well by dbIII · · Score: 4, Funny

      and I put together the CPU unit 2 years ago

      Cool! Not only do you have a model M but you also have a semiconductor fab plant!

    19. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did anybody ask you what YOU run? This isn't an article about ShooterNeo's new desktop that he so ingeniously built with spare parts (aren't you clever) and saved so much money. Try lugging your desktop and your 27in monitors around in the field, you asshat, then report back about how your desktop is so ubercool and better than Lenovo's offering.

    20. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, three-thousand?! There's no way that can be right!

    21. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes they do. Those people are not on Slashdot =P j/k

    22. Re:Well by ducomputergeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We just bought two Quad core desktop machines with 8GB of Ram & 750 GB hard drives for $550 each. Granted, one is for database development, and the other is an emergency, emergency emergency database back up for our live site. (If the other 3 hosting providers would some how fail).

      When I was more into the video production side of things, I lugged around a 17" powerbook. It was big, heavy, and inconvenient to use, especially on airplanes. That's why I moved to the 12.1 Powerbook that I am STILL using to type this.

      If you are going to get a 17" to sit and park on a desk, or move from the home to the office, for that amount of money, you could get a pair of really, really good desktops and an external hard drive or use VNC.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    23. Re:Well by flosofl · · Score: 1

      A display calibrator is US$30-60.

      Well, not a good one. Those are just cheapo models Datacolor, Pantone, and X-Rite make so Dad's family pictures will look "good enough" when printed. A pro-caliber color calibrator for serious graphic work will set you back $1500 for the low end. Even the portables for quickee on-the-fly calibration are going to run you at least $300.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    24. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a lot of people call the whole box the CPU.

      yeah, the same people who call internet explorer "the internet", and who google "ebay.com" because they dont know what an address bar is.

    25. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      desktop != notebook

    26. Re:Well by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps if you had a portable computer, you'd get out of the house more and have more exposure to people who know how to spell words like "hand-built" and "terabyte", and who know that while using "CPU" to refer to an assembled computer could be synecdochic, the term "CPU unit" is redundant and proof positive that you're just a housebound failure. You're also drawing a false comparison between what is most likely a Pentium 4 class rig, incapable of exploiting the 4 gigs you're running in it, and more modern hardware. Your 2 grand rig probably could have been put together for half that. Ironically, most of us probably agree with your conclusion, that the W700ds carries a ridiculous premium, but I for one wouldn't want to be on your debate team.

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    27. Re:Well by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      I built this machine 2 years ago. It has an e6400, overclocked to 3.2ghz. Yes, I've looked very carefully at the benchmarks : I could put another $1200 and upgrade to an i7 with an SSD, but I would only get an average of 20% more CPU performance.

    28. Re:Well by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      e6400. 50% overclock. PER core performance is within 20% of the top end CPU you can buy today, and the apps I run are not multithreaded, unfortunately.

    29. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignore these trolls.

      CPU stands for central processing unit. That is where processing is done. It is not done in your keyboard or screen but in the box. The fact that other things go on in there is not relavant. It's like saying we can't call the chip a CPU coz its also got cache ram on it. The ACs are too impressed with the fact that they know what a processor chip is. They don't really belong on ./...

      Posting anon to avoid undoing mods...

    30. Re:Well by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      This machine was built 2 years ago. I have a core 2 duo at 3.2 GHZ, several hard drives at 7200 rpm, an Geforce 8800 GT, sennheiser HD 580 headphones, and dual DVI ports (yours has only single, so you can't have 2 monitors like I do. Also, good quality 28" displays without a TN panel, comparable to mine, cost more like $800 each). So no, my e-wang is bigger. And, obviously, if I had built it today, it would be an i7 based system that would also e-spank your sleek new laptop.

      Still, that is a sweet system. Just, as always, for the same cost, desktops >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> laptops in performance and usability at the same price point.

    31. Re:Well by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      1. Yep, a housebound medical student during his basic science years, where my job is to study 8 hours a day.

      2. My browser doesn't have spell check, its a long story why.

      3. I am using XP 64 bit, and it's an e6400 chip overclocked by 50%. I recently considered upgrading, but found that it would not give me much more CPU performance per processing core. It would e-spank the W700d, however, at most tasks despite being 2 years old.

    32. Re:Well by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      I can tell you what you don't get for your 3 or 6 grand - you don't get a left handed model. This takes me right out of the market segment.

    33. Re:Well by Inda · · Score: 3, Funny

      The two screens, with the brightness set above seven, makes the laptop lighter.

      It was on page three of the article.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    34. Re:Well by V!NCENT · · Score: 1
      --
      Here be signatures
    35. Re:Well by V!NCENT · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not to mention that Lenevo (read = IBM) laptops are not 'just for mobility'. The built quality is just insane(ly good).

      Laptop makers like Dell & co are building their portables with predictable failure in mind. That ofcourse means the cheapest of the cheapest parts that they can get their hands on and it must die in a certain amount of years, while Lenevo is know for building laptops that last and can resist impacts (like the harddisk that stops working when the laptop sensing it is falling).

      So in other words you pay more money for a laptop that is built to last for as long as you'd wish. Lenevo is known for making Linux friendly computers, so you pay extra for the additional Linux testing. You also pay for the innovation that is really innovative (like the 'falling'-sensor so your FS doesn't get corrupted by a HD shock). The only thing that doesn't work yet is the fingerprint reader and the GPU switcher on Linux, but you can't blame Lenevo for that because there is simply no such functionality in Linux.

      The GPU switcher is software that is being worked on in X.org (but development/planning has stalled) that switches between the onboard GPU and the ATI/nVidia GPU based on power management.

      --
      Here be signatures
    36. Re:Well by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      Alright, now take it down to Starbucks to work on stuff while you have a coffee.

      So much for boasting about '2 grand', huh? I agree with your point, but there are uses for expensive, portable computers, even uses that justify spending that kind of money.

      Lol. No offense, but people who do real work don't do it at Starbucks. Have you ever tried to write a computer program or derive any complex theory in that environment? You can't string a series of connected thoughts.

      Starbucks is for emailing/websurfing while pretending to work while actually people-watching and showing off. Now if you said "take it to the airport," that would make more sense.

    37. Re:Well by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention that it comes with a portable nuclear power generator to keep this beast running.

    38. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I know, there is no such thing as a Core 2 Duo 3.2GHz. There is a Core 2 Quad at that clockspeed that was released last year, so unless you're overclocking/underclocking I don't know where you got your CPU from.

      As I said, I have 3 display outputs on this laptop. VGA, HDMI and DisplayPort. I could potentially have 4 displays if I wanted to "stoop" to using the VGA port as well.

      So you are saying you spent around $1600 for your 2 displays and were able to buy a Core 2 Duo 3.2GHz (if they even exist now, let alone back then), motherboard, 4GB RAM, 1TB hard drive, Geforce 8800 GT (which didn't come out until late 2007, less than 1 1/2 year ago), case/PS, keyboard, mouse, DVD drive and whatever standard components for $400 back in early 2007?

      Let's analyze this.

      1) A Core 2 Duo 3.0GHz costs about $150 and a Core 2 Duo 3.3GHz costs about $250 right now. Also, as I said earlier, I don't think the C2D was ever released at 3.2GHz clockspeed.

      2) A Geforce 8800 GT is probably about $100 right now. It was originally released in late 2007, which was less than 1 1/2 years ago so the card didn't even exist when you claim to have built your PC.

      3) A 1TB hard drive is probably about $100 right now. The first 1TB hard drive was released in May 2007, less than 2 years ago and would have cost about $300-400 back then.

      Now rewind 2 years ago when you say you built your computer. Either the components didn't exist or the combined cost of just the CPU, video card, hard drive and displays would have been well over your stated $2000 cost. I'm sorry, but that all sounds a little fishy to me.

      Regardless, laptops get cheaper and cheaper all of the time. In contrast to what the cost difference between a desktop and laptop used to be, laptops will soon be as inexpensive as their desktop equivalents.

    39. Re:Well by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      So a medical student doesn't feel the need to be able to spell, independently of a computer ?
      Sorry Miss Jones when I wrote hypoglycemic I meant to write hyperglycemic and your so your notes were dangerously wrong. The nurse pumping you full of glucose was my computers fault because the spell checker didn't catch it.

    40. Re:Well by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I agree with your basic point that portable computing power cost more money, but I hate it when people compared over-clocked stuff to other stuff, because 1) It's not supposed to run at those speeds and may not do it reliable and maybe more importantly 2) The other part can also be over-clocked so who gives a shit, it's still better.

      Your CPU is still slower, both per core and from having less cores.
      I doubt you'd say "oh no thanks I don't want it, I already have a E6400." if someone offered you to switch CPUs.

    41. Re:Well by cheftw · · Score: 1

      ... when I wrote hypoglycemic I meant to write hyperglycemic and your so your notes were dangerously wrong. The nurse pumping you full of glucose was my computers fault because the spell checker didn't catch it.

      I feel utterly compelled to let you know that if your spell checker can tell which of those two words is appropriate then I would like to subscribe to your newsletter post haste.

      Ironically enough my Firefox 3 with standard British (correct) English spellcheck flagged both words as wrong.

      What do you guys hate about the "ae" diphtong?

      --
      Always back up, never back down. ---- Think you're cool 'cos your uid is prime? Take mine, modulo the one digit integers
    42. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now guess which type of calibrator is built-in to the Thinkpad.

    43. Re:Well by Blademan007 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Not to start a fanboy flamathon, but Apple Mac laptops have had built-in display calibrators for years.

    44. Re:Well by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I know, I was pulling your chain, more or less.

      But I think it's a low bar to set to say that one "hand builds" something when it's just assembling six prefabricated components. By that standard, just about every computer is "hand built", it's just a matter of who did it and where.

    45. Re:Well by nametaken · · Score: 0

      Does your wheelbarrow have an outlet? I'm guessing that battery lasts about 8 seconds on a full charge.

    46. Re:Well by Kraeloc · · Score: 1

      The bathroom is the place I shit. I do that not in my shed or my car, but in my house. The fact that other things go on in there is not relevant.

      CPU refers to a specific component with in a device. Redefining it to mean the entire device simply confuses things.

    47. Re:Well by Forge · · Score: 1

      For a time (7 months or so) my Laptop case contained 2 laptops with chargers, an external floppy drive and a spare battery for one of the Laptops. (One was a turnkey configuration for a project I was working on). I never put it on a scale but I am pretty sure that bag weighed in at over 25 Lbs,

      Which brings up another point. portability is subjective and heavily dependent on the size/strength of the person expected to carry the machine. I was comfortable with my "double pack". The other person on the project went through 7 months of misery.

      My point is, if you can haul this beast without slipping a disk or dislocating a shoulder and can afford the steep price-tag, go right ahead. It looks like a useful feature rich tool/toy.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    48. Re:well by ani23 · · Score: 1

      well i did have the suckiest experience. not to mention the random products they are throwing out which ibm never did. e.g. i got a thinkpad reserve from one of our local dealers cos no one buys em. he sent it by mistake instead of a regular X61. they have this concierge service for it. the guy never picked up although it was 24 X7. on monday someone answers and promises to call back but i never hear back. they have a website dedicated to it. i forget the name. that website doesn't even pull up anymore. definitely not IBM material anymore.

    49. Re:Well by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      ...well, it should play the 'Look at me, I am rich' wav file similar to that iPhone app, at least once during bootup.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    50. Re:Well by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "Back to the grand parent's point that "the extra cost really is just for mobility." "

      Fine. Let us get back to that and put it to rest so we never have to hear it again.

      Lenevo is NOT taking the same components as found in a desktop machine and repackaging them. When you go from Desktop to Laptop almost everything changes. Everything needs to be super fast, but weigh as little as possible and consume very low power. The CPU used, the North and South Bridge, and various other ICs and chipsets are different . They cost more. Everything cost more. Manufacturing costs are higher. Engineering costs are much higher, because they need people who understand all of this.

      So no , the cost is not "just for mobility".

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    51. Re:Well by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 1

      Lenevo is NOT taking the same components as found in a desktop machine and repackaging them. When you go from Desktop to Laptop almost everything changes. Everything needs to be super fast, but weigh as little as possible and consume very low power. The CPU used, the North and South Bridge, and various other ICs and chipsets are different . They cost more. Everything cost more. Manufacturing costs are higher. Engineering costs are much higher, because they need people who understand all of this.

      Yes, exactly.

      So no , the cost is not "just for mobility".

      WTF? That pretty much directly contradicts everything you just said.

    52. Re:Well by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      You can buy little things with wheels to move such weights! Very durable, good for at least 2000 km of walking or even running, and costs about $15.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    53. Re:Well by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I think you are looking at the phrase "just for mobility" as meaning "mobility, and all of the many added costs incurred in providing that mobility." In my opinion the OP used the phrase as "paying way more than appropriate for a pretty box and attractive packaging." The operative word is "just" in this case. You are not paying more "just for mobility" (for repackaging the same old thing in a smaller form factor), you are paying more because what you get is significantly different .

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    54. Re:Well by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      20%? You need to more closely examine the benchmarks.

    55. Re:Well by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      PER CORE. AKA, for tasks limited to single CPU core.

    56. Re:Well by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      Not true : you can't overclock laptops very well. They don't have the cooling for it, and overclocking the CPU would double power draw and cut battery life in half.

    57. Re:Well by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      I think I spell pretty well. Doctors mostly use abbreviations anyways. I don't see how mispelling hyperglycemic like "hyperglicyemic" would change the meaning any.

    58. Re:Well by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I was speaking in general, I'm not stupid enough to over-clock so in my case it win already on stock speed anyway.

    59. Re:Well by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      This thing is one of their main selling points. They'd be pretty harebrained to skimp on that.

    60. Re:Well by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      Well, don't argue over language in English, where people don't drive in a driveway, don't park in a parkway and don't rest in the restroom. At least some people still bathe in their bathrooms sometimes.

    61. Re:Well by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      When doctors make mistakes, people die. Be sure to double check the abbreviations for milligrams and micrograms, just in case.

    62. Re:Well by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      So a medical student doesn't feel the need to be able to spell, independently of a computer ?

      Does it matter? Doctors' writing is illegible anyway.

      Sorry Miss Jones when I wrote hypoglycemic I meant to write hyperglycemic and your so your notes were dangerously wrong.

      Yes. You're certainly an authority on how to write correct English.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    63. Re:Well by toddestan · · Score: 1

      He just said 3.2Ghz, but not anything else. It's probably a Pentium D, that would be about right for 2 years ago, and the 3.2Ghz version was very popular.

    64. Re:Well by Forge · · Score: 1

      Rolling luggage works on tile and carpet. It's barely usable on Asfault or course concrete and completely useless on the beach, on a farm or in a deep rural village.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    65. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The i7 would still be better. It has turbo boost which will automatically boost the CPU speed beyond stock speed when not using all cores. Core 2 CPUs based on Merom or later also have something similar called IDA (Intel Dynamic Acceleration) which will overclock a single core when running non-MP aware applications. Your Conroe based E6400 doesn't have either of those technologies.

    66. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason they cost $1500 is because your company will pay for it.

      Other than the fees to Pantone(because they invented colors!), a calibration sensor doesn't cost much more than a webcam to manufacture. Because it is just a camera that has its color response mapped out precisely for every batch of silicon.

      If you know somebody in China who can get them from the factory sidedoor, you can probably get them for $10-20 bucks+shipping.

    67. Re:Well by Shaper+of+Myths · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually I've gotten the fingerprint reader to work on my T60 in Ubuntu, even from the command line. My guess is that it wouldn't be too terrible to get it working on this machine either...

      http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/How_to_enable_the_fingerprint_reader_with_ThinkFinger

  2. The Thinkpad Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the Thinkpads began doing our thinking for us, it really became there world, not ours anymore.

  3. Dual Screen? by SYSS+Mouse · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    with slide out display?

    I thought it is dual screen as in.. one on top and another at bottom. *cough* Nintendo *cough*

    1. Re:Dual Screen? by conlaw · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I wonder if the dual screen will sell any better than the "butterfly" keyboard that was part of the IBM Think Pad in the 90's. Apparently, at that time, IBM thought that what laptop users wanted was a larger keyboard, so there was some sort of mechanism by which the keyboard on the laptop spread out. IIRC, this setup didn't work as well in practice as it did on paper, and didn't last very long.

      http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Expandable+keyboard+puts+new+IBM+ThinkPad+in+a+class+of+its+own-a016694636

    2. Re:Dual Screen? by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      I had the misfortune of working at an IBM authorized warranty repair place at the time, and was certified on those pieces of crap. I still have the occasional nightmare that includes replacing a 701 keyboard.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    3. Re:Dual Screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be a tough job for someone doing repairs but for someone using it it was great. I wish the keyboard on my current laptop would feel as nice as the one on my 701CS.

  4. 4 Months ago by olddotter · · Score: 1

    Not more than 4 months ago I was thinking someone should make a note book with slide out screen. In fact I would mind 2 slide out screens. More and more often I an very greedy for additional screen real estate.

    Working with a standard 15" notebook screen is like drafting on a napkin with a magic marker. Its good for making notes. but not for serious detailed work.

    1. Re:4 Months ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      ...Working with a standard 15" notebook screen is like drafting on a napkin with a magic marker...

      Not so terrible with a really high-rez LCD display. I was really surprised by how much more they can display over the usual 1280X800 displays. Text looks a whole lot better, too.

    2. Re:4 Months ago by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

      Assuming that your eyeballs don't suck like hell.

      I've had to ramp up the font size on my desktop, just to be able to run it at a fairly sensible 1280x1024. I'm getting more content on screen than in the olden days, but not much more than someone with regular-sized fonts on 1024x768. And this is all on a 17'' screen. I can't even read stuff on my girlfriend's Macbook.

      The worst part is, I'm 26. Not looking forward to when I start losing vision due to age.

    3. Re:4 Months ago by kantier · · Score: 1

      Seems to me this can help you: http://blag.xkcd.com/2009/02/25/kindle-2/ . Munroe was looking for a portable (as in not heavy), hi-res display laptop. Found two that met his criteria, the Vaio P and the ThinkPad X200s. Original request for help here: http://blag.xkcd.com/2009/02/11/a-math-problem/

      But if what you're looking for is a phisically bigger screen, then go desktop.

    4. Re:4 Months ago by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Working with a standard 15" notebook screen is like drafting on a napkin with a magic marker. Its good for making notes. but not for serious detailed work.

      It's not so bad if you can find one with a 1920x1200 resolution screen. You'd have to move to 24" screen on a desktop to get the same resolution. Though admittedly, the 1280x800 15" screens on many cheap laptops are pretty much crap.

  5. Yo Dawg by bpkiwi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yo Dawg, we heard you like LCD screens, so we've put an LCD screen inside your LCD screen. So now you can look at things while you look at other things.

    We also heard you like pointing devices, so this baby has three of them!, with two sets of buttons!

    1. Re:Yo Dawg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We also heard you like pointing devices, so this baby has three of them with two sets of buttons!

      +1 WTF were they thinking?!

    2. Re:Yo Dawg by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      We also heard you like pointing devices, so this baby has three of them with two sets of buttons!

      +1 WTF were they thinking?!

      "When Steve Jobs hears about this, his head's going to explode."

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    3. Re:Yo Dawg by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because Steve Jobs know much better what you need and want than you do!

    4. Re:Yo Dawg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder where they got their inspiration?

    5. Re:Yo Dawg by Aranykai · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      +1 Best post ever. Seriously, that was epic. You'r already +5 so I figured I would post instead of use mod points.

      --
      If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    6. Re:Yo Dawg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for illustrating why slashdot needs a "-5 cancer please DIAF" modifier.
      Please Return from where you came.

    7. Re:Yo Dawg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twitter - MrXtoThaZ

      Someone wants you to do something.

    8. Re:Yo Dawg by uniquegeek · · Score: 1

      I was at a computer store last week where a customer started prodding the buttons on a monitor, asking if these were "the manual mouse operating device". I guess he figured it would be a good idea to have a backup in case the mouse broke down.

    9. Re:Yo Dawg by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Bah, those LCD display's aren't high-resolution at all! I saw the demo video, and it didn't look any cleaner than on my current laptop.

      In fact, it looked about as clear as a video streamed over the internet!

      (srsly, why do they bother with demoing hi res screens on low-res video?!?)

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    10. Re:Yo Dawg by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like this laptop was made by Pizza Hut.

    11. Re:Yo Dawg by toddestan · · Score: 1

      +1 WTF were they thinking?!

      If it's anything like mine, you can customize how they work with the included utility. I have my Trackpoint set up as the mouse, and the touchpad as kind of a 2D scrollwheel of sorts, which works well as you don't have to worry about how imprecise touchpads are when you're just using them to scroll around.

  6. Re:A "miss" on 2 security features being crippled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck is wrong with you? Stop spamming this shit all over the place, you pathetic man.

  7. Genuine Windows by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the specs:
    Operating System: Genuine Windows Vista Business 64

    It's a good thing the put "Genuine" in there to clarify things. Otherwise people might assume IBM was shipping this $6,000 notebook with a pirated copy of Windows to keep the price down.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Genuine Windows by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 1, Funny

      When Win7 releases they'll probably play catch up to Apple and rebrand it "iGenuine"

    2. Re:Genuine Windows by gbrandt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lenovo is not IBM

    3. Re:Genuine Windows by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Lenovo is not IBM

      And it's a Chinese company, isn't it?

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    4. Re:Genuine Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's no backronym!

    5. Re:Genuine Windows by ani23 · · Score: 1

      was probably a requirement from microsoft. still funny

    6. Re:Genuine Windows by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      How long ago did Lenovo Buy the thinkpad rights? Cause to this day, if you need a BIOS or driver update, or need to read the knowledgebase, or their SPM site, its all at ibm.com. Seems kinda pathetic, really...

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    7. Re:Genuine Windows by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      All thinkpad drivers and updates are available on Lenovo's site and it has been this way for a while. If you try to go to support on the IBM website thinkpads aren't even listed.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    8. Re:Genuine Windows by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      Not to nitpick, but the Thinkpad line was sold to Lenovo ages ago. IBM isn't shipping this notebook at all.

  8. Re:A "miss" on 2 security features being crippled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you know it is a man? It is women who generally tend to go on and on about things...

  9. Re:Offensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, could your grandmother use it?

    Unless your grandchild is reading the article, your entire point is invalid, since the implication of your post seems to be that you're a grandmother and able to use it.

    Calm down - it's just an expression based on grandparents (usually) being less tech-savvy than their 16-30 yo grandchildren. I have a feeling that you're well aware of that, but somehow - in a self-righteous fit - convinced yourself could be ignored.

    I've heard the expression "so easy your grandparents could do it", is that better? (But my grandparents are dead - they don't even get a chance to do it, you insensitive clod! Discrimination! Bloody murder!)

    And "agist" - please... You think you can just add -ist to anything and start screaming "oppression!"? Get over yourself and find another hobby than arguing semantics.

  10. But will it ... by AigariusDebian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... run Linux?

    And this time it is no meme, but a real question. What good are slide-out screens and fancy fingerprint readers if they are based on such obscene hardware hacks that a normal operation system would be unable to use it all.

    That is something reviews would actually be useful for.

    1. Re:But will it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that OS must evolve then, eh?
      The Samsung SyncMaster 2263DX has a 22"+ 7" screen and works fine

    2. Re:But will it ... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      ... run Linux?

      I think it probably will. I'm not quite sure how the screens link up, but the fact that it uses an nVidia GPU is promising, as these are well supported. If you prefer to use nVidia's own drivers with their Twinview, that might present a challenge (not sure), but I've had lots of practice at setting up Xinerama, and I think it should cope.

    3. Re:But will it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is actually something I'm somewhat interested in knowing. I don't tend to believe in desktop replacement laptops, but this does have some pretty nice features. However I don't like Windows, so I would rather not need to use it to make the hardware go.

      Unfortunately some of the design decisions do prevent me from really wanting one. Among them is the presence of the clitmouse, and having ports on the front and back of the unit. I know a lot of people are going to think I'm nitpicky about the latter, or outright out of my mind about the former, but I don't care.

    4. Re:But will it ... by DaemonKnightVS · · Score: 1

      Of course it will run linux. Slide out screen will function the same way as running dual monitors. Finger print scanner? HP has had them for years. So have lenovo probably. Infact I've seen linux software to run finger print scanners in the past! Wacom tablet? Bloody well ought to. Everything else will be fine. Don't understand why you were modded insightful.

  11. Re:Offensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Troll post and you fooled for it.

  12. well by ani23 · · Score: 1

    I am sick of lenovo and their customer service. I remember how I used ot get knowledgeable reps for thinkpad services with IBM. with lenovo it has hit such a low point I dont think I will be continuing my loyalty to thinkpads anymore.

  13. The screen is on the wrong side by harmonise · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The screen is on the wrong side. Because of the numeric keypad, the home position for typing is to the left side of the computer. This means that you are facing the left side of your screen while typing instead of facing the center of the screen. Putting the second screen on the right makes this even worse. You'll type while always looking slightly to the right. If the screen had been placed on the left side, at least a user could sit in front of the computer, type, and be facing the center of the two screens.

    --
    Cory Doctorow talking about cloud computing makes as much sense as George W Bush talking about electrical engineering.
    1. Re:The screen is on the wrong side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah I would tend to agree with you, but for some reason most graphic designers put the pallets to the right of the screen. Just habit I guess, but old habits are hard to break. I think they most likely looked and where people placed pallets and put the screen there.

    2. Re:The screen is on the wrong side by Random+Destruction · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're thinking like a coder, not like a graphics pro. The wacom tablet is the main input device, not the keyboard.

      --
      :x
    3. Re:The screen is on the wrong side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most graphics pros don't use wacom boards, and factor in the tiny size of it along with the price and you should get a good derisive laugh. Replacing or adjusting copy, which is where having a laptop rather than just a hard copy could be a lifesaver on important trips, isn't really helped by a wacom tablet.

      This thing's got a very limited market, even among the people most of us would think could use it. Some people doing field work in video/film could get it in their budget, and some web designers who waste their money on the latest gadgets will buy it.

    4. Re:The screen is on the wrong side by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      if you put a designer to choose between this baby or an MacBookPro 17" guess what.. Seriously, this kick ass almost for the same price.. a RAID and a Quadro FX WTF it's a tank. Can't see why a company launching a very targeted machine can be bad, But not just for designers, that little screen can be useful in games, to put the media players, rss readers, desklets, torrent client, all that little stuff that you run while doing actual work.

      Maybe designers waste a lot in visual related gadgets because they work with their eyes (Yes, coders do use the eyes too, but is not an issue if the mono type font it's a little bit off the pantone right? or do color matching creates bugs in code or something?), having visual problems can really hinder your productivity being a designer and shortens your work "half-life" because nobody hires designers that because of shitty screens and bad illumination now can't really tell the difference between 5% increase in a given ink.

      And yes designers crave/salivate/rape for good looking things, I blame the fact that they are designers, who would have think about it.

    5. Re:The screen is on the wrong side by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

      Habit, or the dominance of right-handed mousing ;-)

      I know that every time I've had multi-monitor set up, it's the left-hand monitor that I use as my primary monitor, and my right-hand that I use for overflow/constantly up things.

    6. Re:The screen is on the wrong side by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Looks like it's on the correct side to me. Most people seem to have their 2nd monitor on the right, rather than left, from what I've seen. The fact that it has a built-in Wacom tablet should have clued you in as to who this laptop was designed for. If you use one hand on the keyboard and the other hand on the tablet or an external mouse on the right, the the screen is better off on the right. Either way, I'm not sure that I buy your idea of it being a big problem to begin with.

    7. Re:The screen is on the wrong side by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      As a graphic designer and photographer, I can tell you that professional graphic designers use the keyboard all the time. They just spend a lot of time with only one hand on the keyboard. Keyboard shortcuts are a graphic designer's best friend.

      Still, I think the screen is on the correct side, even though I don't like the laptop very much. Perhaps there is enough of a "Windows graphic designer or photographer on the go" market to make it worth it, but it wouldn't surprise me if it flops in its target market.

    8. Re:The screen is on the wrong side by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd rather have the Macbook Pro. I know it may not seem like much sense at first, but no laptop with a 2nd screen is going to make me feel at home like a nice, big desktop set-up will -- it's always going to be a compromise, and a compromise which also compromises the portability of the laptop. Compromises all around. Not what I want in this case.

    9. Re:The screen is on the wrong side by GuerillaRadio · · Score: 4, Funny

      They just spend a lot of time with only one hand on the keyboard.

      Must...resist...

      --
      If a man empties his purse into his head no man can take it from him. An investment in knowledge pays the best interest.
    10. Re:The screen is on the wrong side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in china their text is right-to-left top-to-bottom, no?

    11. Re:The screen is on the wrong side by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      In addition to being a computer professional, I'm a Wacom-using designer/illustrator... and the secondary display is on the wrong side for me as well. I've always been used to finding tool palettes on the left side of my display, so when I added a second display as a place to put them (so I could have the main display for my work itself), I put it on the left side. It feels more natural to reach for them there, maybe because it simulates how an artist would hold a physical palette of paints: in his left hand. Not that I would be likely to buy a neither-fish-nor-fowl monstrosity like this regardless, but the fact that it's "backwards" to my way of working nixes it completely.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    12. Re:The screen is on the wrong side by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Does it have a seperate numeric keypad? Most lenovos have them as numlock overlays.

    13. Re:The screen is on the wrong side by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      What stops you from putting the image on the slide-out monitor and the tools on the attached monitor? You *do* realize that the distinction between "main" and "secondary" monitor is completely arbitrary and can be changed at any time, right?

    14. Re:The screen is on the wrong side by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      You can bet your arse that anyone who uses a tablet as their "main input device", and already carries a laptop of this size around, won't use the tiny built-in tablet this laptop provides. I mean, I'm an amateur and my A5 tablet seems a bit cramped at times.

    15. Re:The screen is on the wrong side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, the display on the right is a low quality one by design. The high quality display with the calibration tool is on the left.

    16. Re:The screen is on the wrong side by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      If you had even glanced at the computer we're talking about, you'd realize what a stupid suggestion this is. The distinction between a 17" primary display and a 10" secondary display is not at all "arbitrary".

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    17. Re:The screen is on the wrong side by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      Since Thinkpads are the best looking laptops on the market, that's one more plus for it over the Apples. =)

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
  14. Re:A "miss" on 2 security features being crippled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See this for more details.

  15. Re:Information about Lenovo ThinkPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Typical monkeylover ranting. GTFO.

  16. WTH by Eil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So the engineers at Lenovo have pretty much crammed more "computer" into this laptop than any laptop has had crammed so far. Two screens, nearly full keyboard, two pointing devices, a digitizer tablet, along with a metric crapload of CPU, video, disk, memory, along with the usual gamut of notebook options. It'll set you back between 3000 and 8000 cool US dollars.

    And it still comes with a built-in dialup modem inside.

    What. The. Hell.

    1. Re:WTH by narcberry · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But does it have an LPT port?

      --
      Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
    2. Re:WTH by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      It'll set you back between 3000 and 8000 cool US dollars.

      I'm personally waiting for ThinkPad Reserve Edition of this: http://www.engadget.com/2007/06/15/thinkpad-reserve-edition-unveiled/

      What? $8000? . . . that's chump-change.

      So the engineers at Lenovo have pretty much crammed more "computer" into this laptop than any laptop has had crammed so far. Two screens, nearly full keyboard, two pointing devices, a digitizer tablet, along with a metric crapload of CPU, video, disk, memory, along with the usual gamut of notebook options.

      But wait . . . if you order NOW, we will include the Spiral Slicer (tm) as well!

      . . . and a Ginsu:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ginsu

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:WTH by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      In designerland, only old people print with the LPT port.

    4. Re:WTH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe they can get them for something like half a buck these days, and they don't think it's worth the trouble to alter the motherboard design to remove it. Or maybe they just made a good deal in 1999 to purchase 3 million mini-PCI modems a year for the next 15 years. Who knows?

      BTW, the thing actually has three pointing devices: the Wacom style tablet, a touchpad and a trackpoint (the tiny joystick-like thingy between the G, H and B keys).

    5. Re:WTH by gringofrijolero · · Score: 1

      It's also a fax, right? Can be pretty darn convenient.

      --
      Todos mis movimientos están friamente calculados
    6. Re:WTH by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful
      WTH with you, buddy? If I'm paying top dollar for a laptop, it better have every input/output port known to man.

      Guess what? Outside of the giant city where I'm going to assume that you live and spend 99% of your time, modems are useful. Faxes and dialup get the job done. There's never any internet at the factories I visit in China, but just hook up the phone and dial 16300 and I can get my emails.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:WTH by denzacar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And it still comes with a built-in dialup modem inside.

      What. The. Hell.

      Last summer we got together at my friend's summer house to celebrate the international worker's day (and the resulting 4-day weekend) by spending some time away from the smog and eating large quantities of barbecued meat.
      We even had some of our friends from Croatia come over. One of them is a photographer for a daily newspaper.
      He had to juggle-up some free time since he was supposed to be "on the call" that day, but he managed to get a colleague to do that for those couple of days.
      Still, as he is better with color correction - he had to bring his laptop just in case some photos had to be checked before being sent to print.

      Naturally, there is no wireless, DSL, cable or any other kind of dedicated internet connection at the summer house.
      There is a phone line though.

      And you can bet your ass that there WAS an emergency, and that the integrated modem DID come in handy.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    8. Re:WTH by yttrstein · · Score: 1

      I liked it better when IBM made those Thinkpad things.

    9. Re:WTH by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

      Uh, why wouldn't you want a modem? They're cheap and take up almost no space, and they're the kind of component you almost never need nowadays, but when you do need it, you're really glad you have it. A few months ago my cable internet went out for a few hours, and of course my boss chose that time to call and tell me there was some sort of issue with one of our servers. I could have driven around looking for some wireless, or cracked the nearby WEP APs, or I could.. plug into the phone line, use the modem, and do what I need to do. Sure was nice to have a modem right then.
      >
      Also handy when visiting elderly relatives who haven't caught on to the whole broadband thing and probably never will.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    10. Re:WTH by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      You forgot DisplayPort, DVI, and VGA connectors, an ExpressCard slot, Firewire, and an integrated colour calibrator.

      I'm surprised they don't have serial and parallel ports on this thing as well, but I guess they needed to make room for the four exhaust ports for the cooling fans. Something tells me that this 11 lbs behemoth moves a lot of air. I wonder what the battery life is, an hour maybe?

    11. Re:WTH by evilviper · · Score: 1

      And it still comes with a built-in dialup modem inside.

      What. The. Hell.

      I dread the day that modems and RS-232 cease to be available on computers.

      First, because of the "dumb terminal" capability... While practically no-one uses it for text these days, it's still of TREMENDOUS benefit for sys admins and others.

      Modems are still a nice option for sending or receiving faxes, not to mention voice modems which can be provide full-fledged voice-mail/PBX capabilities.

      And if nothing else, we've got a couple centuries of history and legacy tied-up in our modems... They can still connect to the earliest and slowest modems, and might well be able to drive an old stock ticker, on which early teletypes were based.

      It's unfortunate modems haven't be improved over the past few years to provide DSL, ISDN, or T-1 (CSU/DSU) capabilities instead of just traditional dial-up features... I'd certainly opt for a PCI "modem" in my OpenBSD firewall, instead of an external DSL box with it's own wal-wart, and requiring an ethernet card.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    12. Re:WTH by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I dread the day that modems and RS-232 cease to be available on computers.

      We might be at that point for RS-232 and laptops. I haven't seen a new laptop with a serial port for a while now, which is a bummer because those USB-Serial adaptors suck.

    13. Re:WTH by evilviper · · Score: 1

      What problems, with USB to RS-232 adapters, are you referring to?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    14. Re:WTH by owlstead · · Score: 1

      It's probably in the chipset, and this laptop is not waterproof anyway. It'll cost them the connector and a tiny space on the side of the computer. If there is only 3/4% of the people happy to have a backup modem in the computer, adding about 1% more sales, it's probably worth it (as long as you don't deliver full technical support: modems are nightmares for technical support).

    15. Re:WTH by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Most of it has to do with timing. USB is a shared bus, so you can't guarentee the timing depending on how the time slices get alotted. That means sending a command can take 15ms once time and 50ms the next time, which can be pretty annoying if timing is critical (though if it's really critical I suggest using GPIB and not RS-232, at least as instrumentation goes). Another problem is that USB devices can't initiate a transfer (unlike RS-232), which means that the host (PC) has to periodically poll the adaptor to see if something is trying to talk to it, which once again messes with the timing. Plus, some just seem to drop data - the worst of the ones I played around with seem to be about 0.2-0.3% of the time, so it's intermittent enough to be annoying but not perioditic enough so that the problem is obvious. At least until I wrote a quick program where I had a serial device echo back what cammands I sent to it, and found that 20-30 times out of a thousand something happened so the PC didn't get back what I sent (with no errors reported back by the OS, which made trapping this somewhat tricky). Running the same program using the onboard serial resulted in a 100% success rate.

      Then some devices, for reasons I don't fully understand, simply refuse to work with the USB serial adaptors. Maybe it has to do with the timing, I'm not sure. Though I have seen the opposite a few times (the device works on a USB adaptor but not the onboard on certain PCs), so maybe some devices just suck too.

  17. RAID-0? by FSWKU · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can understand having RAID-0 on there from a performance standpoint, but it's downright STUPID on its own. For one, there's the obvious pitfalls of running the entire thing on such a setup (queue the old "the 0 stands for how many bytes you can recover if something goes wrong" joke). Secondly, if I'm going for pure performance, I'm NOT putting my OS and my scratch space on the same volume. If they want to be serious about this, they need to ditch the optical drive altogether and have room for another HDD for the OS and non-throwaway things. Granted, you should be making regular backups. But at least if one drive fails, the data is still a lot easier to get back than if it were thrown across two drives.

    And yes, this is honest constructive criticism here. I'm a proud ThinkPad owner myself (T60 to be exact).

    --
    "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    1. Re:RAID-0? by Aranykai · · Score: 1

      Statistically speaking, a raid 0 is no more likely to fail than a single disk. Obviously it pales in comparison to a mirror for redundancy, but this system is about performance.

      --
      If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    2. Re:RAID-0? by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

      I think, actually, it is. Not by a huge factor, but it changes from being simply the possible failure rate across one disk, to being the possible failure rate across both disks. The likelihood of any one disk failing within X is slightly lower than the likelihood of any one of two disks failing. Additional, ultra-tiny failure chances are added by the addition of other points of failure (the RAID controller could fail, etc) and two hard drives in a laptop certainly stress the cooling system more ;-)

      That said, it's a really, really small difference.

    3. Re:RAID-0? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      If you're working with graphics, especially serious graphics, the storage on the laptop is basically nothing but temp storage. You'll put it on your desktop or your array or whatever when you get back into the office. I see no reason for "scratch" space and the OS to not be on the same disk, or even array. You load the OS, you load your app, most of it's in memory. You aren't going to get a lot of contention.

    4. Re:RAID-0? by jps25 · · Score: 1

      I see someone does not understand probability.

      A raid 0 is indeed more likely to fail than a single disk.
      Let's say the probability of one disk failing within 5 years is 2.5% and we have a 2-disk raid 0.
      Then the probability of the raid 0 failing is
      P(X>=1) = 1 - P(X=0) = 1 - (1-0.025)^2 = 0.049375

    5. Re:RAID-0? by evilbessie · · Score: 1

      RAID is not a backup and unless you have oodles of cash to go for very fast flash RAID-0 7k2 disks are probably the fastest drives you can get in a laptop. and for some people (not many) speed and 'portability' is what they need.

    6. Re:RAID-0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is probably a difference in failure rates between manufacturers and models. That number is probably more significant, yet either is unknown or neglected. The failure rate due to defects or physical accidents is also unknown and likely more significant than the danger of RAID 0. Anyone concerned about data loss must therefore produce backups. Since the only relevant probability calculation then involves the simultaneous failure of the master copy and backup, and this probability is lower than the simultaneous failure of one's brain and the master copy (fatal car crash, fire, etc.), the probability of the usefulness of probability calculations is 0.

    7. Re:RAID-0? by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      probabilistically speaking, if p is the probability one disk will crash and burn within a period of time, p + p(1 - p) (strictly more than p) is the probability you'll have a RAID0 crash and burn within that same period of time.

    8. Re:RAID-0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is probably a difference in failure rates between manufacturers and models.

      that's p, or in the example 0.025

      That number is probably more significant, yet either is unknown or neglected.

      what? are you retarded?

      The failure rate due to defects or physical accidents is also unknown and likely more significant than the danger of RAID 0.

      no, it's not.

      Anyone concerned about data loss must therefore produce backups.

      incorrect conclusion but what a revelation...
      who would have thought backups make sense...
      really...

      Since the only relevant probability calculation then involves the simultaneous failure of the master copy and backup, and this probability is lower than the simultaneous failure of one's brain and the master copy (fatal car crash, fire, etc.), the probability of the usefulness of probability calculations is 0.

      you truly are retarded.

  18. Opps by Lordnerdzrool · · Score: 4, Funny

    Uh, boss. We accidentally put two screens on this laptop. What should we do?

    Hm... Charge people twice the price and call it a feature!

  19. What a ripoff. by tjstork · · Score: 1

    For six thousand bucks, I could buy myself a 16 way server, use it as a workstation, and pay someone to carry it around for me.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:What a ripoff. by ani23 · · Score: 1

      so considering that your 16 way server is free f cost and you expect to use the lcd, system and generator for at least 2 years ur guy will luge the shit around for $300 per month. hook me up

  20. Canyonero? by sortius_nod · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did Homer Simpson just join the Lenovo design team?

    1. Re:Canyonero? by NoPantsJim · · Score: 4, Informative

      Homer did not design the Cayonero, he designed "The Homer". The Cayonero was not designed by any major character, but was promoted by Krusty the Klown when he got into stand up comedy.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oh_Brother,_Where_Art_Thou%3F

    2. Re:Canyonero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA-HA!

    3. Re:Canyonero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you Comic Book Store Guy!

    4. Re:Canyonero? by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Thank you for clearing that up, Comic Book Guy. :)

  21. The electronic equivalant of this sandwich by tjstork · · Score: 1

    Wow, Lenovo made the computer equivalent of the big mac chicken patty sandwich.

    http://thisiswhyyourefat.com/

    This uber notebook is a total redneck thing. AS a redneck, I'd like to say, that's why I like it. If they shipped it with a good buck knife and a DVD on hunting in the field, then we'd be styling.

    --
    This is my sig.
  22. Re:A "miss" on 2 security features being crippled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all rather cruel. It's just nasty to bully someone so obviously mentally ill. While I don't condone APK's rude behaviour, I think that much worse behaviour can be found in the people hounding him - e.g. this Jay Little character deliberately provoking him and getting his websites shut down. Not pleasant.

  23. Dual screen? More like 1 1/3 screen! by syousef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Calling this thing dual screen is not too different to calling an old tv with an lcd display of the channel number dual screen. Okay that's a _slight_ exaggeration. Only slight. The second "screen" looks like it's not worth the trouble. Good for task lists and the like but not much else, yet oh so breakable. The headline had me envision something like a tablet pc with a second screen - instead I see something about the size of a size mirror on a combi van. More gimmick than useful. Farq off.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Dual screen? More like 1 1/3 screen! by Enleth · · Score: 1

      I think it's intended to be a holding place for Photoshop toolboxes, and for this task it's just the right size. You see, it makes an enormous difference if you can just maximize your work on one screen without obscuring it with any tool windows and put those on a separate screen, especially if you're working with huge, high-resolution images.

      --
      This is Slashdot. Common sense is futile. You will be modded down.
  24. why not a SSD/HD combo by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    64G SSD for the OS and bits...
    320G HD for Applications/Data/mp3s/movies.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:why not a SSD/HD combo by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      Not only would an SSD lower power consumption, but it would probably be faster too. I can't imagine what kind of battery this thing packs. They should have added a few more disks in a RAID5 configuration to make things ever faster!

  25. Rearview mirror. No wait, backup monitor. by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

    This would be useful for Gimp and other software with floating tool bars. Put the content on the main (color-calibrated!) screen, and keep the tools on the side.

    --
    Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
  26. More GHz != More Performance by Francis · · Score: 1

    It's unfortunate that CPUs have gotten so complex, but clock speed is not a particularly good indicator of performance, even on seemingly similar CPUs.

    Once upon a time I was curious to do a rough benchmarking of the various CPUs I have access to, just to get a sense of which ones were faster. What I did was to write a simple single threaded traveling salesman solver (http://morbo.cs.pdx.edu/traveling_salesman.c) and run it on all the machines and see how long it took. (Extra detail: The main part of the TSP solver uses less than 4KB of memory, so it should all fit in the CPU cache.)

    I got one of my most surprising results when I compared my laptop to my desktop.

    Desktop machine: Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 3.00GHz
    Laptop: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 2.53GHz

    Both are dual core "Core 2 Duo" CPUs. Intuitively, I would have guessed that the desktop machine would have been faster because the desktop is not designed to be as power-conscious, and it has the faster clock speed. I was wrong.

    For this particular test, it turns out that the laptop was about 50% faster than the desktop, even though they're both Core2Duos and the desktop has almost 20% "more GHz".

    --

    --
    #include <malloc.h>
    free(your.mind);
  27. Is it an 8-bit panel? by GleeBot · · Score: 1

    They'll talk up all the other specs, but anyone who works in graphics is going to want an 8-bit panel on this fancy laptop of theirs. That one feature is probably worth more to a real professional than all the rest of the bling.

  28. Ummmm, why wouldn't it? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Modems don't take up much space, nor cost much money. So unless you are dealing with a very small laptop (you aren't) or a cheap one (again not) why wouldn't you include a modem? The idea of laptops is to be able to take them on the go. Well guess what? Some places you go may not have high speed Internet. I know for the geek that has never left the city this might seem impossible but it happens. There are places where high speed just hasn't gotten to yet. However phone lines, well those are pretty wide spread. While it isn't impossible to find a location without a phone line, it is far more difficult than finding a place without high speed Internet.

    Thus you include a modem, so that if it is needed, it's there. No reason not to when you've got the space and the $5 for the hardware isn't a major part of the price.

    So while I wouldn't get a modem for a desktop, I'm glad my laptop has a modem, I've actually made use of it. My grandma finally did get high speed Internet because my uncle got tired of her not having it and set it all up, but until very recently she didn't. So when I went to visit her, it was dialup or no access.

    It isn't as though the computer is just dialup. It also has a wired Ethernet connection, and WiFi. It just includes dialup as a fallback option.

    1. Re:Ummmm, why wouldn't it? by Eil · · Score: 1

      It just seems to me that by now broadband is so popular that it would make more sense to leave the modem out and instead sell an optional external USB modem like Apple does. Hardly anyone would miss it and it would bump their profit margin up a bit. I could see the case for a dialup modem in a netbook or mid-range laptop but anyone lugging around this beast of a portable graphics workstation is not typically going to find themselves in some dusty back-country with only a phone line to the outside world.

  29. rather unique?? by MagusAptus · · Score: 1

    Cannot RTFA. It hurts too bad.

    Something is either unique or it is not. It cannot be /rather unique/.

  30. Re:Offensive by Hal_Porter · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    From the article:

    "This thing is so well designed, your grandmother could use it."

    As a 48 yo grandmother, feminist, and longtime C programmer, I find that offensive. It's agist and sexist. No one would have said "...your grandfather could use it."!!

    If you stayed in the kitchen you wouldn't be in any danger of reading offensive stuff on the internet.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  31. Aah... but... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Can you also afford to buy enough cable to power it everywhere you go?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  32. Lefty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure would be nice if they had a mirror-image version with the writing pad on the left side of the mouse. Anybody left-handed is going to have a lot of trouble using this toy.

  33. Check out Sager NP9262 for a bargain by kjhambrick · · Score: 1

    Max out out this one http://www.sagernotebook.com/product_customed.php?pid=29175&action=customize/ for a bargain luggable Workstation

    1. Re:Check out Sager NP9262 for a bargain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alas, no trackpoint...

  34. This is what Intel's Matrix RAID is for. by CoffeeBen · · Score: 1

    What would really be ideal is Intel's Matrix RAID, which allows you to either stripe or mirror individual partitions. That way you could carve up your two-drive volume however you'd like. Stripe your swap/scratch partitions for performance, then mirror your OS and data partition(s) for fault tolerance. I'm truly surprised Lenovo didn't think to include this versatile chipset.

  35. Actually, no need for the "unit" qualifier by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    There seems to be a huge amount of revisionist history being produced by people who don't know theirs in response to your correct use of the term CPU. The term CPU predates the invention of the microprocessor. CPU is absolutely a valid term for the unit that can run computer programs. In fact, with the exception of SoCs (System on a Chip) the use of the term CPU to describe the microprocessor, while prevalent (I do it myself in fact), is actually a misnomer - unless of course you can run a program without RAM, for example.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    1. Re:Actually, no need for the "unit" qualifier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, a CPU is a central processing unit.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cpu

      Nothing but that little piece of silicon in a modern computer is the central processor.

      The correct term for the "CPU unit" is called a "computer". It refers to the CPU and all necessary supporting electronics as a whole. It would even be more acceptable to call the computer the "case" or the "chassis" (although technically those are incorrect too), but never a "CPU unit"; you might as well call it the "hard drive unit" or the "power unit".

  36. HD park - Apple by arete · · Score: 1

    Maybe IBM did it first, I have no idea - but I know the Macbook Pros, at least, have been doing this for a while now, too.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
    1. Re:HD park - Apple by nekokoneko · · Score: 1

      Indeed, IBM did it first.

  37. Who is this thing aimed at???? by gun26 · · Score: 1

    I don't get it. This is a super-expensive product and the extra screen and digitizer tablet, combined with the high end processors and GPUs available, would aim it squarely at graphics professionals, and successful wealthy ones at that. But isn't that whole industry using Macs anyway? I don't see a graphics art type abandoning his Mac for this. (And yes, I agree with the previous posters that the slideout screen is on the wrong side for most users, who tend to keep tool palettes on the left side.)

    One thing about creative types is how appreciative they are of attractive industrial design. I think that's part of the reason these people gravitate to Macs in the first place. But this computer seems to be continuing the old Thinkpad tradition of butt-ugliness. Any creative guy buying it is going to make himself a laughingstock among his colleagues.