Slashdot Mirror


Amiga Community Collaborates On Restorative Gel To Brighten Your Old Plastic

jamie pointed out an Amiga community that took a discovery of how to restore old computer plastic, super-charged it, and then opened the process to the public domain. Time to spruce up those old dusty TRS-80s in the basement. "All of the initial tests were done with a liquid and we realized that for large parts this was getting expensive, so the next stage was to make a paintable 'gel' version that could be brushed onto larger surfaces. This was tried in Arizona in the sun and the UK under a UV lamp and was found to be just as effective as the liquid. We have now released this to the public domain for anyone to use as we can't patent it and we coined the nickname 'Retr0brite' for it, as it summed up what we were actually doing with it."

225 comments

  1. Skin by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

    Does this work on human skin as well? No? Damn.

    Man, the robots only cure their own disease these days. I'm starting to think they don't care about us humans anymore.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Skin by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Yes and it can easily cause burns on soft tissue and excess exposure is thought to be carcinogenic as well. This sounds very similar to standard tooth whitening gel many of which are light activated.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    2. Re:Skin by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to apply it to human skin? Are you trying somehow to cure Asian people?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:Skin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two letters enough?

      M
      J

    4. Re:Skin by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      that's funny, I read the hydrogen peroxide warning and (not having taken a chemistry class) had to research it. This inevitably led me to the problem with wikipedia where I eventually made the discovery that Michael Jackson's disease (Vitiligo) in fact causes him to create hydrogen peroxide which bleaches his skin.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
  2. From the wiki by FrameRotBlues · · Score: 4, Insightful

    However, a chance discovery was made in March 2008, by The CBM Museum at Wuppertal in Germany, that immersing parts in a solution of Hydrogen Peroxide could partially reverse the process.

    They accidentally immersed old plastic parts in Hydrogen Peroxide?

    Sounds like a "whoops" turned into a "cool!"

    1. Re:From the wiki by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or they were trying to bleach it and clean off all the accumulated crap, and found that it did that *and* changed the surface chemistry as well.

      I used to restore old watches -- the mechanical ones. They're jammed with grease and wax that mechanics didn't put there and usually that's a large part of why they're not working. It's fairly routine to dunk something that looks like the Antikythera Mechanism into a cleaner just to get all the horribleness out.
      (A note to anyone considering doing this: avoid ammonia. Those are very delicate little bits of brass. Ammonia works spectacularly well. If you leave a watch movement in there for an hour rather than just a few minutes, you'll come back to find all the wax *and* all the metal completely gone except for the steel and a few of the large pivots.)

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    2. Re:From the wiki by LoadWB · · Score: 1

      Actually, this was discussed on amiga.org in response to -- or concurrently with, I am not sure -- the amibe and a1k threads. H2O2 was discussed as a way to make this work, and several of us tried it and were pleasantly surprised with the results. I am not convinced this was a "whoops," but the result of many many years of listening and reading. Without having read the site yet, I have to imagine there is more to the story than straight H2O2. The gel idea is really nice, as it would eliminate a "bath."

    3. Re:From the wiki by iocat · · Score: 1

      This is so great. I can finally stop buying Apple //c's on eBay now, always trying to buy a "better" model that was never exposed to UV and yellowed. I have 11 //c's at thi point... Uh, i really, really, liked the Apple //c. Thanks a million to the retro community for this!

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    4. Re:From the wiki by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      Your sig is so on-topic, I just had to say something.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    5. Re:From the wiki by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Key questions I have:

      #1 - Will it work on my old NES/SNES and my HP Laserjet 4 printer?

      #2 - Do I really need a UV lamp or can I just do it and stick them in the sun on a nice bright day?

    6. Re:From the wiki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From reading TFA, I gather that, yes indeed it should work on the ABS casing for both your NES and your LaserJet, and sunlight is a successfully tested alternative to a UV lamp.

    7. Re:From the wiki by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at Wuppertal in Germany

      Well, if it works for creating blonds...

    8. Re:From the wiki by pipatron · · Score: 1

      Why don't you, like, click the link and find out?

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    9. Re:From the wiki by DZign · · Score: 1

      This solution sounds very interesting..

      now what I could use is a solution to restore yellowed clear plastic (acrylic) as used on pinball machines..

      I'll give it a try on some broken parts and hope it works too..

  3. offtopic, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is something special going on at the moment or why are all stories today getting hardly any replies?
    everyone jumping ship?

    1. Re:offtopic, but by Ninnle+Labs,+LLC · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      All the cool kids already left for Digg and Reddit after all the shitty idle posts kept coming to the front page.

    2. Re:offtopic, but by Chris+Ashton+84 · · Score: 1

      Slashdot's rss feed didn't correctly link to the article, so maybe people are having problems getting here.

    3. Re:offtopic, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm looking for alternatives, tired of the bullshit, erroneous and sensationalist anti-microsoft posts. Digg sucks, not sure about this Reddit, someone else suggested Arstechnica...

    4. Re:offtopic, but by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think it has something to do with Feedburner wigging out today... every time I click on a Slashdot link in Google Reader, I get a Feedburner error.

    5. Re:offtopic, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I figured all the Digg and Reddit folks are busy being sidetracked by their form of ilk - Idle. As I filter out Idle, I'm just not seeing them anymore.

    6. Re:offtopic, but by DECS · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're looking for Paul Thurrott's SUPERSITE for WINDOWS.

      He's the AM Radio of the tech industry and the intellectual force behind the Microsoft Party.

    7. Re:offtopic, but by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Reddit isn't too bad once you filter out the politics and atheism.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    8. Re:offtopic, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The preceding comment was paid for by Apple, Inc.

      Shills like you need a disclaimer.

  4. After so much silence.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Fuck computers. We're going into gels."

    1. Re:After so much silence.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Fuck computers. We're going into gels."

      I think KY already has a product for that.

    2. Re:After so much silence.. by duguk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Fuck computers. We're going into gels."

      I think KY already has a product for that.

      But that's only for Apple users ;o) /joke

    3. Re:After so much silence.. by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Where can I get one of these "fuck computers"?

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    4. Re:After so much silence.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      www.apple.com and get the iDildo.

    5. Re:After so much silence.. by fireman+sam · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or you can use the DIY Gentoo based computer called "Go fuck yourself"

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
    6. Re:After so much silence.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can use the DIY Gentoo based computer called "Go fuck yourself"

      I don't understand the Gentoo reference.

    7. Re:After so much silence.. by robthebloke · · Score: 1

      There's a typo in the parent post, it's the new "Fcuk computer"

    8. Re:After so much silence.. by fireman+sam · · Score: 1

      With the Gentoo distribution you get the sources and build it yourself.

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
  5. Amiga Community by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Both of them?

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    1. Re:Amiga Community by Tiger4 · · Score: 1

      My Amiga 1000 (512KB, with 68881 co-processor!) has been sitting in the bottom of the old coat closet, waiting for this development so it would be useful once again. They should call it "anti Obsolescence gel"

      --
      Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
    2. Re:Amiga Community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just watch if you had a real time clock too - early-amiga-era clock batteries have a VERY nasty habit of leaking onto the motherboard after a few years in storage, eating through circuit traces (not limited to amigas either, watch out on any computers from that era with battery-backed clocks)

    3. Re:Amiga Community by Jamie's+Nightmare · · Score: 0

      My Amiga 1000 (512KB, with 68881 co-processor!)

      For real? You purchased a math co-processor without a ram expansion?

      --
      "When you see a unixer brainwashed beyond saving, kick him out of the door." - Xah Lee
    4. Re:Amiga Community by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Yeah I still have my old Amiga 500 with Kickstart 2.0 it still runs great.

      But I use my Amiga emulator because it is faster and saves my Amiga from wearing out. Yes I do legally own a few Kickstart ROMs in order to use the emulator.

      My old Amiga 1000 broke down the floppy drive and keyboard and monitor, but it lasted about ten years from 1985 - 1995. I bought the Amiga 500 in 1996 to replace the Amiga 1000 at an Amiga convention.

      I am looking forward to AROS getting ready for prime time so I can develop applications for it. That is because I cannot afford the PowerPC AmigaOS 4.0 systems and I'd rather use an old PC with AROS instead.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    5. Re:Amiga Community by Tiger4 · · Score: 1

      No, the box came with 256K, and I expanded it up to 512K and co-processor with the Sidecar.

      --
      Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
    6. Re:Amiga Community by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "My old Amiga 1000 broke down the floppy drive and keyboard and monitor, but it lasted about ten years from 1985 - 1995." "

      Yuo bought the POS C= monitor right? You were supposed to listen to Joanne Dow and buy the Sony KV1311CR monitor. Mine is still working and has a great picture with better colors than the sukky C= monitor ever had. Ans they didn't arc, snap and blow up like those POSs did.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    7. Re:Amiga Community by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      My Commodore 1701 monitor (the C64 version, not the 1901 C-128 one) is still in use as my television set, for the odd occasion that I actually turn it on to watch something on television.

      It's been my TV for 20 years, and it's still doing just fine.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    8. Re:Amiga Community by Lord+Pillage · · Score: 1

      My original 1989 Gameboy has been in my bottom drawer just waiting for this occassion. Finally I can restore its original Dot Matrix Awesomeness!

      --
      try { Signature mysig = new CleverAttempt(); } catch(NonCleverSignatureException e) { postanyway(); }
    9. Re:Amiga Community by teknopurge · · Score: 1

      amiga 1000 owner reporting.

    10. Re:Amiga Community by teknopurge · · Score: 1

      I have the sidecar too, plus the 256k front plug-in.

      The golden age of personal computers......

    11. Re:Amiga Community by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Nice to meet you, Amiga 3000 here. Maybe I should have said "both of us."

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    12. Re:Amiga Community by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      I bought the 1080 Commodore Amiga monitor as a bundle for my Amiga 1000.

      I didn't learn about the Sony monitor until later. But I replaced the Commodore Amiga 1080 monitor with a generic one designed for the Commodore 128 and it worked quite well.

      There were Amiga to SVGA adapters for multi-synch SVGA monitors by Sony etc to eliminate the interlace flicker problems. I just wore polarized sunglasses to avoid the flicker.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  6. How many other uses? by netruner · · Score: 1

    It sounds to me like this concept has a lot more potential uses. There are likely many other types of plastic where the same protection chemicals were used. While this probably won't help anyone dealing with plastics exposed to other environmental hazards (like dashboards which fade out under too much sunlight), it may prove useful in restoring other items.

    What other items can you think of?

    --



    DISCLAIMER: This post was not checked for speling and grammar- if you complain- you're a whiner
    1. Re:How many other uses? by jimboisbored · · Score: 1

      I didn't RTFA but if it's the same reason for discoloration the SNES and Norstar phones usually get pretty yellow.

    2. Re:How many other uses? by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I immediately thought of old toys, like my precious ships for the star wars action figures, the imperial shuttle or b-wing whose plastic is all faded and yellowed. Now I can run around the room with them making laser noises and re-enact scenes from ROTJ just like I did when I was eight. Awesome!

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    3. Re:How many other uses? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      It sounds to me like this concept has a lot more potential uses.

      I wonder what type of plastic is used for the lenses in headlights?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    4. Re:How many other uses? by budgenator · · Score: 2, Informative

      I assume that they are an acrylic, although polycarboanate plastic is also a possibility. I also assume that they are the thermoplastic variety rather than the thermosetting type. Acrylics often use an amine catalyst which tends to cause yellowing. Moisture and UV exposure causes embrittlement, clouding, cracking and crazing in acrylics.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    5. Re:How many other uses? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      This ought to work for yellowing SNES's and early Macs/IIGS's too.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:How many other uses? by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      I have an original Game Boy that could benefit from this procedure.

    7. Re:How many other uses? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      This was also what I immediately thought of - my poor old faded Millennium Falcon will ride again!

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    8. Re:How many other uses? by Fireye · · Score: 1

      Clearly that's due to Cheetos and Cheesy Poofs, not bromide or any other chemical in the plastics.

    9. Re:How many other uses? by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      If they come up with a way to restore the tightness of the joints in my GI Joe and Star Wars action figures, then we'll be in business. I've been using those thin rubber bands used in packaging produce.

    10. Re:How many other uses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds to me like this concept has a lot more potential uses.

      I wonder what type of plastic is used for the lenses in headlights?

      That was my first thought too...
      I think that anyone that can come up with a quick, rub on, rub off gel headlight lense restoring solution ( without using sandpaper ) will probably become rich in no time.

  7. mind in the gutter, I blame the intartubes by Scrameustache · · Score: 1, Funny

    It sounds to me like this concept has a lot more potential uses. There are likely many other types of plastic where the same protection chemicals were used. While this probably won't help anyone dealing with plastics exposed to other environmental hazards (like dashboards which fade out under too much sunlight), it may prove useful in restoring other items.

    What other items can you think of?

    Used dildos?

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  8. now to try it on legos by theycallmeB · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this would work on LEGO bricks? Particularly the white ones that fair very poorly in the sun. That a good method for polishing out scratches would make the day of many a LEGO collector.

    1. Re:now to try it on legos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      an buffing wheel with some appropriate grit would do it. Watch out for heat legos melt at a low temp.

      I know a dude who used to own a cd buffing station. That would probably work as well if you could hold the piece down.

  9. Find your old nintendos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally a way to Bring that shine back to my NES case!

  10. New Business Opportunity? by meerling · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, makes you wonder if there is a niche market around for making those dingy office machines look like new.

  11. Hydrogen peroxide attacks some plastics by hcdejong · · Score: 5, Informative

    You'd have to be careful with at least PET, because that degrades when exposed to H2O2 for more than a minute or so. So I'd check for possible side-effects before attempting to spruce up your preciousss with this.

    1. Re:Hydrogen peroxide attacks some plastics by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Funny

      You'd have to be careful with at least PET, because that degrades when exposed to H2O2 for more than a minute or so

      No no, they're talking about restoring AMIGAS, not those angular early 8-bit Commodore computers.

    2. Re:Hydrogen peroxide attacks some plastics by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      You'd have to be careful with at least PET,

      Well it looks like the Commodore 64 survived, and the PET was a lot more solidly built :-)

      (Sorry. I'll get my coat)

      (Anyway, ISTR the PET was made out of metal...)

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    3. Re:Hydrogen peroxide attacks some plastics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Anyway, ISTR the PET was made out of metal...)

      Yes, yes they were made out of metal. Here's a helpful hint for all you kids out there- Don't use the side of the (metal) monitor enclosure to store a spare speaker by sticking the magnet to the metal.

      Oh, one more hint- Don't forget to save to tape regularly- every once in a while the whole system would seize up when you hit return, and everything in RAM (on a PET, that was everything), would be lost. Like for example, the program you just spent 10 or 20 hours straight writing, with almost no notes...

    4. Re:Hydrogen peroxide attacks some plastics by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      every once in a while the whole system would seize up when you hit return

      ...and when you tell that to young people today, they don't believe... Oh, wait..

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  12. Wow. Bleaching. How novel!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's been lowering the IQ of brunettes for years.

    Obviously the submitter has no idea what the predominate color of a TRS-80 is.

  13. not news: bleach alternative cleans things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next they'll be posting how (diluted) acetone takes marks off metal computer cases.

    1. Re:not news: bleach alternative cleans things by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem here is that it's not that the plastic is 'unclean' but that the material has chemically reacted with UV and fire retardants to fade the plastic itself. It's the MacBeth of stains - you scrub and it never comes out.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    2. Re:not news: bleach alternative cleans things by sexconker · · Score: 1

      We call that "Bundy Yellow".

  14. The original Macs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember reading about a process that could be applied to the original compact Macintosh boxes (the ones with the 9-inch CRT black and white screens) to restore the case plastic that tends to yellow or darken noticeably as they get older (most of them are 20+ years old by now, so this is to be expected). Anyone know about this?

  15. Soft Scrub by amigabill · · Score: 1

    I've in the past used Soft Scrub cleaner to clean up my old Amiga stuff. This way may be better than what I've done, possibly easier than the gentle scrubbing I did, and I did have to individually scrub each keyboard keycap, which was not particularly fun. I may try this as I get some old stuff ready for ebay.

  16. Strong oxidants and glycerine? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Better make it only in small batches. B-(

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Strong oxidants and glycerine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a pretty stupid sig you got there.

  17. Amiga TRS-80? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ah yes... the venerable Amiga TRS-80. As much as I appreciate the requisite throwaway jokes in summaries, you really couldn't think of any Commodore Amiga product? Even a C64 jab would have been better.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Amiga TRS-80? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I thought it was the Commodore TI/994A.

    2. Re:Amiga TRS-80? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      If Jack Trmaiel was dead, he'd be rolling in his grave. As it is, you better watch your back.

      Remember son, business is war. And ole' Jack intends to win!

    3. Re:Amiga TRS-80? by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      Luckily Jack was to Business as Joseph Bonaparte was to War. Completely ineffective.

      Yes, I'm a bitter owner of two Atari ST's.

    4. Re:Amiga TRS-80? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I'd watch who you're calling "ineffective". I don't see you cratering any multi-billion dollar markets, thus allowing you to purchase the largest gaming company in the sector for little more than a song.

      Ole' Jack may not have been an admirable business man, but he did have an effect. He even managed to leave the market with a significant amount of money in Atari's bank! (Go figure.)

  18. Don't knock the Amiga by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Back in the day, Ami was a real contender.

    Buy an A1000 and run some graphics demos on one. Then try to remember that it was made in 1985.

    I've always dreamed of what the world would be like if modern computing had gone this route. Imagine your OS as a bank of roms, and your PC as a fully integrated machine rather than a patchwork of PCI cards and third party drivers.

    Seriously, Amiga was an excellent design.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Seriously, Amiga was an excellent design.

      Too bad it was made by Commodore. How's that joke again... if Commodore ran KFC, they'd advertise it as 'dead warm poultry'.

    2. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Skylinux · · Score: 1

      ahhh gaming consoles come to mind .... just like my Amiga 500, with memory extension card the size of an old PCI modem.

      Amiga 500 > Insert Floppy ..... wait .... game loads
      Random Console > Insert media ... wait ... game loads

      Amiga 500 > Insert Amiga Workbench floppy ... wait ... AW loads
      Random Console > Insert Linux CD ... wait ... Linux Desktop loads

      --
      Everyone who buys Wild Hunt will receive 16 specially prepared DLCs absolutely for free, regardless of platform.
    3. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yea. Amigas can do anything!

      That aside, Bones is actually a pretty good show if you can ignore the "scientific" leaps.

    4. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Imagine your OS as a bank of roms, and your PC as a fully integrated machine rather than a patchwork of PCI cards and third party drivers.

      You mean, imagine your PC as a Mac? (Classic Macs had the OS in ROM, and the integration goes without saying.)

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    5. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by mdwh2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've always dreamed of what the world would be like if modern computing had gone this route. Imagine your OS as a bank of roms, and your PC as a fully integrated machine rather than a patchwork of PCI cards and third party drivers.

      But in many ways, I'd argue that modern computing has gone the Amiga way: consider how most motherboards now have everying on board, and it's only the graphics card that people might optionally have as an extra for performance. (Whilst drivers can be a pain, they have the advantage of allowing standardisation through an API - the Amiga was moving towards a driver model for graphics and so on, and I'd have thought it a great advantage for any modern machine taking advantage of 3D hardware, so chances are that a hypothetical modern Amiga would have drivers too. Chances are they would've dropped the ROMs too - AmigaOS 3.5 onwards came entirely on CD.)

      Consider: today I run a multitasking OS, with combined GUI and command line. The machine I use has dedicated graphics and sound chips, and everything's integrated on the motherboard. Finally, I'd argue that today's machines are modern Amigas. Compare that to the DOS based PCs, or single-tasking non-command-line and no-chipsets on the classic Macs. Looking back, it's laughable how people back then tried to justify their expensive primitive purchases (e.g., claiming that it was better not to have a GUI), when we see how computers are designed today. The Amiga was written off as a games machine, but what is it that now drives the 3D graphics industry, and arguably the personal computer industry as a whole? Yes, I like having a fast machine with decent graphics in front of me, rather than a boring command line operated piece of business furniture, or a black and white interface that doesn't let me do things the way I want it. The only thing stopping it being a modern Amiga is the trademark.

    6. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by mmontour · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Buy an A1000 and run some graphics demos on one. Then try to remember that it was made in 1985.

      Remember also that many of the main features of Microsoft's Windows 95 (32-bit code, preemptive multitasking, long-filename support) were present in the original "Amiga 85" OS.

    7. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOS3.5 was distributed on CD, but it used the 3.1 ROM.

      No surprise they used a CD instead of 6+ floppies.

    8. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Imagine your OS as a bank of roms, and your PC as a fully integrated machine rather than a patchwork of PCI cards and third party drivers.

      Uh, Apple did that for, what, 15 years or so? They gave it up, which makes me think the "patchwork of PCI cards" must be superior on some way, at least.

    9. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      True, but I mean they updated it with patches that were stored on hard disk, rather than releasing a new ROM.

      A ROM made more sense when hard disks were expensive and few people had them in lower end machines. Just because we're hypothesising about a modern Amiga doesn't mean that everything had to stay the same - it would be like thinking modern PCs should be running a very fast version of DOS. In fact, I'd suspect that if Commodore had stayed in business, then any modern "Amiga" would share little other than the name - just like as happened with Macs, or Windows. (Indeed, some of Commodore's plans for future Amigas at the time included switching to a new CPU, replacing AmigaOS with NT, and a new graphics chipset that was incompatible with the existing chipset.)

    10. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Saffaya · · Score: 1

      >>Amiga 500 > Insert Amiga Workbench floppy ... wait ... AW loads

      Compare to:

      ATARI ST > Switch on > under GEM within 3 seconds

    11. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Classic Macs had a toolbox in ROM.. really nothing more than BIOS plus some QuickDraw routines.

      It's a far cry from the "OS". At least Apple IIs had BASIC and the Monitor in ROM so you could actually use them sans-disk.

    12. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by commodore64_love · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Everyone blames Commodore, but let's face it, the early 90s was a rough time for the computer industry. Atari went bankrupt (goodbye ST), Commodore went bankrupt (goodbye Amiga), and Apple would have gone bankrupt too (goodbye Macintosh) if it had not been saved at the last minute by Gates. The industry was consolidating around the Intel 486 platform, and I don't think ST, Amiga, or Macintosh would have survived even if run by someone as brilliant as Andrew Carnegie. What they offered looked unattractive to early 90s computer users who believed alternative platforms were as obsolete as newspapers today, and that everyone should be using the soon-to-arrive Windows95. In fact I can still remember the near-hatred from my fellow students: "You use an Amiga??? Everyone knows companies use IBM, and so too should you. You wasted your money."

      Statistics show that less than 7% were interested in a non-IBM-compatible platform in 1994. That was quite a blow to Commodore who just eight years earlier controlled 40% of the market. Even now I can't believe Macintosh is still alive (3% share). I suspect if Gates focused his energies, and stopped Ballmer from making boneheaded decisions, he could kill-off the Mac fairly easily..... just as he almost succeeded in doing circa 1994.

      Point - Nothing could have saved Commodore. Just as nothing could save JVC from losing its VHS market. The market had changed. (link - http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2005/12/total-share.ars/10 )

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    13. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Twinbee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm guessing the 'patchwork' allows more competition for companies to one-up each other, and also allows for a more modular design. I loved the Amiga, but as long as decent interfaces and standards are used, it makes sense to modularize.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    14. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd bet AAA would have been compatible enough.

      After that they'd probably have enough OS support to make sharper turns in chipset design though.

      That and I don't think NT could be a serious thought around anyone in C= that was actually responsible for making anything work.

    15. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad it was so dependent on hardware chipsets for various tasks. That really hindered its growth and acceptance.
       
      Heck, all those things the Amiga did were pretty trivial given it's dependence on specialized chips.

    16. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      That's no coincidence. The PS1 games often have the same "feel" as an Amiga game: insert disc, power up, wait about a minute for the game title to appear. The menus follow a similar style as well, such that I feel like I'm back in the late 80s/early 90s again.

      And the old Genesis games, even though they lack a disk drive, often were direct ports from the Amiga or ST computers. When I play Genesis Populous it looks and acts just like my Amiga Populous. Only the music is different (inferior).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    17. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by jrumney · · Score: 1

      The software on the Amiga, on the other hand, was modularized. Want PNG support? Install a PNG-IFF filter and all apps that read and write bitmap images using the standard OS APIs can now read and write PNG. OpenDoc promised the same thing in the early 1990s, but never materialised, so we are still stuck with OS designs in all the major OS's that force you to deal with file formats directly.

    18. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by hattig · · Score: 1

      Hahahaha but I like the custom case mod.

      Maybe Bones is set in an alternate universe where Commodore didn't sit on their arses, and they released the A1200 in 1987 (as per the clip) with full 3D capability and massive IBM PC add-on for the 5.25" disk drive. Sheesh, they could have just shown Gloom or Alien Breed 3D...

    19. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>You mean, imagine your PC as a Mac?

      Yeah basically, but the Mac was missing the key element of "helper" coprocessors. In 1985 the Mac couldn't display 4096-color movies (only black-and-white), or 8-bit music files. Or multitasking. I pushed my Amiga 500 to the limits one time, and I had 30 animated programs all open at the same time, before it finally started to show some slowdown. Impressive for a machine that only had a 7 megahertz 68000. (I'm not sure even a modern PC could do that; whenever I encounter a webpage with lots of animated ads, the computer almost freezes it becomes so slow.)

      In essence the Amiga was a next-generation Commodore=64 - it adopted the same CPU+GPU+SPU integrated design and pushed the boundaries, thereby creating the first multimedia PC that could play full-sized movies and music. In 1985. It wasn't until ten years later that the Macs and IBM/Windows machines finally caught up.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    20. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. Today's PCs are not Amigas, but they are the result of copying the Amiga philosophy. Computer makers aren't stupid. They may have dismissed the Amiga as "just a gaming machine" like they did with the C=64, but they also saw that Amigas were being used by Disney to animate movies, by NBC and WB to create special effects, and by desktop publishers for integrating graphics into print media like magazines.

      It was only natural, rather than lose those users to Commodore, the computer makers adapted. They produced the Sound Blaster to create music. They produced graphics cards that did 16 colors than 256 colors than 65,000. It was a slow process that took around ten years time (1985-to-1995) but eventually PCs became "gaming machines" themselves. Except they wisely called it "multimedia" rather than "gaming".

      Oh well. The business people did what they are paid to do - dismiss the competition as non-relevant "gaming junk" while secretly copying those same ideas into their own machines, until they can co-opt the market for themselves. It's not personal; just business.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    21. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by iocat · · Score: 1

      Try saving your work...

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    22. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Informative

      >>>ATARI ST > Switch on > under GEM within 3 seconds

      Uh. Amiga Workbench was no different. Turn-on, boot from floppy, and done in 2-3 seconds. ----- If you go directly to a CLI then it's virtually instantaneous (the OS is in the kickstart ROM).

      Jeez.

      I can't believe I just got sucked into another ST versus Amiga argument. I thought that nonsense ended twenty years ago. Well at least the Amiga could play music straight out of the box, thanks to its Paula sound chip. The ST sound sucked; like an old 1978 Atari 8-bit, or a touchtone phone. Beep-boop-beep. Even the lowly NES sounds better than an ST.

      Zing. I've still got it. ;-)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    23. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      First off, the Amiga 1200 didn't exist in 1987.

      Second, the Amiga didn't sit "on top" of old IBM PC cases.

      Third, the Amiga didn't use 5 1/4" floppies. It's used 3 1/2".

      Fourth, the Amiga did have the power to do three-dimensional shooters. Like Elite. Or Federation of Free Traders. Or Hostages. Doom may not have been released until the 1990s, but it certainly was not the first 3D shooting game, and creating such a game in 1987 was impressive but not radical.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    24. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      It could have been worse. They could have shown us a 3/4" Umatic tape machine, and claimed it was "amazing technology for 1987". No on second thought, that clip already was that bad.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    25. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To bad GEM was a horrible OS that could not multi task worth beans.

      Fix: Load OS into RAD, soft reset in ~2 seconds ..

      Or get an HD. =p

    26. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 2, Informative

      Too bad it was made by Commodore.

      Hey, now. The original Amiga--the technical foundation of the entire line of systems--wasn't designed by Commodore. It was primarily the brainchild of Jay Miner, the same IC guru that designed the Atari 2600's graphics chip, TIA.

      What's really too bad is that it was marketed by Commodore.

    27. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by schon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's really too bad is that it wasn't marketed by Commodore.

      There, fixed that for you. :)

    28. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Spit · · Score: 1

      Yeah it was a great design in the day, but every PC component has had DMA for a long time now so there would be no real advantage. There were many advanced features in the AmigaOS such as drivers, plugins and mountpoints but some things may have ended up as security nightmares if they continued as legacy. Arexx ports and lack of memory management come to mind.

      --
      POKE 36879,8
    29. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it is. The tight integration with the custom chips was one of the things that killed the Amiga. Those chips were great in '85 but looked considerably less impressive when cheap VGA cards hit the market.
      Apple's shift from proprietary tech to commodity tech didn't happen all at once but now they what they sell are essentially PC hardware. The resulting cost savings I would imagine is significant.
      ADB dropped for USB, Nubus for PCI, PowerPC for Intel etc.

    30. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Mononoke · · Score: 1

      ... and Apple would have gone bankrupt too (goodbye Macintosh) if it had not been saved at the last minute by Gates.

      Wrong. So, so wrong.

      Funny, though.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    31. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by mewsenews · · Score: 1

      Imagine your OS as a bank of roms, and your PC as a fully integrated machine rather than a patchwork of PCI cards and third party drivers. ... like an iphone?

    32. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      BeOS also had that feature. I think that a lot of commercial software companies, frankly, don't like stuff like that and OpenDoc... after-all, if a small OS plug-in is all you need to open and edit Photoshop files, you might not need Photoshop.

      I'm not paranoid enough to believe those companies made any effort to kill the technology. We all tried OpenDoc, and it was a buggy mess.

    33. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by rs79 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Nothing could have saved Commodore."

      I should just repost old comp.sys.amiga threads and save eevrybody some time, and subtitle it "why am I doing this, I know better?". But anyway.

      I had an Atari 400, and made some hardhacks and sw for it. I had an A1000 with a HARD DRIVE. Yes, I rawked, utterly. I worked on a thing that was the precursor to flash, it came from the Amiga.

      One thing would have propelled the Amiga into stardom: Lotus 1-2-3. Lotus set the world on fire in PC land and you had to had one if you pretended you were in business. Word Perfect was the other one. These two were the first PC killer apps. VisiCalc was cute, Lotus sold computers.

      1-2-3 didn't run on the Amiga. Word Perfect did, but way too late and it sucked to the point where it wasn't as good as the MS-DOS version on PCs, remember this is all pre-windows.

      The Atari hung on cause it did Midi well. DTP and art queers kept the Mac alive. The Amiga was the coolest, but back then cool didnt't matter/drive sales. Lotus did.

      And before you freak out, some of my best friends are art queers.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    34. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by keeboo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I never could understand Atari ST users.

      Choosing a ST over Amiga they saved, what, 100 USD and got a good processor, a OK display, a horrible sound output and a mediocre OS (the MIDI output was nice, but how many people actually used that?). Atari had some good software, let's be fair.
      But then they started that ridiculous holy war vs Amiga. If they were so frustrated, why didn't they buy an Amiga in the first place?

      Atari ST was an OK machine back then, but comparing to an Amiga was just ridiculous.

    35. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by keeboo · · Score: 1

      BeOS was, in many ways, an Amiga-ripoff.

      I remember Be, years ago, calling Amiga users to BeOS since it was (so they said) the philosophical successor of Amiga and, differently from the Commodore machine, it had a future and bla bla.
      "Don't waste your time with Amiga, it's gone. Go to BeOS" they said.

      How ironic now.

    36. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Just to add, I remember the Video Toaster fondly. Granted, it was a niche platform; not something that would really propel the Amiga into homes in the '90s, but by '94-96 when I and many others were using 3D Studio (later 3DS Max) and Lightwave on the PC, there was less of a need to rely on the Amiga. As utterly craptacular as the IBM-PC was, once the DOS and Windows software base boomed, there just wasn't a need for my Amiga. I ended up using it for enjoying demos and games.

    37. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by chthon · · Score: 1

      Yep, I even enjoyed elite on a ZX Spectrum, 48k and 8-bit Z80 processor. Wire drawn 3D.

    38. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Atario · · Score: 1

      nothing could save JVC from losing its VHS market

      Maybe, but to be fair, JVC sucks ass. (This I know from personal experience.)

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    39. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Franklin+Brauner · · Score: 1

      You neglect to factor in the time value of innovation. It's arguable that since it took this long to achieve where the Amiga was that we've actually lost well over a decade waiting for PC's to catch-up. Imagine where we might be now had we started innovating from the Amiga on? Imagine what computers will be like 10 to 15 years from now. Who'll be talking about "primitive purchases" then?

    40. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if they ran the same ads in other parts of the world (I live in Sweden). But in the mid 80's, Microsoft run advertisements proclaiming that DOS was a "real operating system" (ha! as if) "made for getting real work done", because you couldn't play (a lot of) games on it!

      The scary thing was, at that time, the Commodore PET was a still superior as a (Swedish) office computer because a user had developed software that was suitable for the Swedish users and the DOS software available was the same kind of half-assed modifications of foreign software that we have to endure today (look how spellchecks used in "Swedish locale" software, still treats Swedish as if it was either English or German; or the Å Ä Ö UNICODE problem: the UNICODE consortium and most foreign software treat åäö like characters with a diacritic, that would be as if they treated G W Y Z B like characters with diacritics in the English language, there are characters with diacritics that look similar to åäö in other languages, but they don't use them as standalone characters, there is no reason mix those two very different sets of glyphs, just because the look slightly similar (no they don't even look the same in (most) pre-computer typography and handwriting)). For running industrial equipment, the Swedish computer ABC 80 (originally a gaming platform from 1978) still beats a "PC" in most user cases (there is still million dollar equipment running that is controlled by them, they never ever fail, in the mid 90's they where still legio in the Swedish industry), the ABC 80 cost 1/10 of a PC in 1983 and 1/20 in 1982.

    41. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You neglect to factor in the impossibility of predicting what would have happened in an alternate, Amiga dominated timeline. We may have been better off, but then again, we may have been worse off.

      A modern PC is a pretty damned powerful machine. I started on a Kaypro 8086 with a CGA display and looking through all of the progress that has been made in that relatively short amount of time, I can't help but be impressed.

    42. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone blames Commodore, but let's face it, the early 90s was a rough time for the computer industry.

      C= did nothing to help themselves. They couldn't market a perpetual motion machine. The story goes that Apple and IBM cacked themselves when the Amiga was launched, but after six months they realised that C= were so inept they had nothing to worry about.

    43. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by robthebloke · · Score: 1

      (the MIDI output was nice, but how many people actually used that?)

      If you had an atari and didn't use the midi output, you looked like a bit of a muppet with a pointless computer (On which the lemmings wouldn't say 'Oh No!' when they blew up - which is actually the only reason I bought an Amiga).

      Anyhow, everyone who owned an ST used the midi output to ensure they didn't look like a complete twat. IIRC the school ranking was

      Amiga > Spectrum 48k > ST > Amstrad

    44. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anyone who denies Apple was near-bankruptcy circa 1994 is in denial. I was there. I recall reading the news articles and wondering if Apple would make it, or if my Macintosh would soon become a paperweight like my Amiga had become.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    45. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      I don't know about JVC as a whole, but JVC does make the best VCRs. Just as Commodore made the best computer, Amiga, but the market in both cases had collapsed. No amount of miracle management could have have saved VHS or Amiga.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    46. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>I never could understand Atari ST user

      Me neither. Atari ST was developed to use Amiga coprocessors, but when that deal fell through, Atari had to scramble to replace them with other chips. The replacements were adequate, but not at the same level as the actual Amiga. The video was bland; the sound was little better than the old Pokey chip from 70s computers.

      I suspect a lot of the users were simply being loyalists. They owned Atari 400s/800s, and then upgraded to a 16-bit machine without considering any other brand except Atari. Later they tried to justify their mistake...er, purchase.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    47. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>> Amiga > Commodore 64 > Atari 800 > Spectrum 48k > Atari ST > Amstrad

      Fixed That For Ya. ;-)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    48. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the video didn't show wireframe. It showed solid walls, which is not something either a Spectrum or Commodore would be able to do. It would be too slow.

      But the Doom-like FPS shown in the video could be done quite easily on a 1987 Amiga. After all the Amiga could do the much-harder task of digitized Dragon's Lair and Space Ace video.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    49. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      I think computers in 2019 won't look much different from computers today. Computers are reaching a plateau where there's little room for growth. Example: Right now I'm using a computer that's 6 years old (3000 megahertz P4), and I don't feel any need to upgrade. Progress has slowed dramatically such that even with a six-year-old machine I can still run everything I desire. It plays CD-quality sound and displays any video upto 1600x1200. Why upgrade? I can't think of any reason.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    50. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Gates no longer heads Microsoft you know.
      Microsoft needs Apple (and Linux) for several reasons:
      - So it can say it is not a monopoly
      - So it can let others invent things, and then copy them.

      I still have an Amiga 512k somewhere, a Macintosh with 512K of ram. Today I use Linux for work, and a little bit of Windows

    51. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by nasch · · Score: 1

      You're right. I tried running 4 videos at once with VLC on Vista, and even after turning off transparency effects my 1.8 GHz dual core with 3 GB RAM (and onboard video card) couldn't play them smoothly. Why you would need to do that I'm not sure, but the fact that a 20-year old computer can do it ~10 times better is still remarkable.

    52. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by metamatic · · Score: 1

      The Amiga was really overpriced in Europe. The difference was over $100 there, and the prices of both machines were higher to start with.

      Also, I borrowed an Amiga 1000 and saw it eat a bunch of floppies. I gather that bug was later fixed, but...

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    53. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Franklin+Brauner · · Score: 1

      You sound suspiciously like my father. ;-)

      Progress doesn't slow, but people do. My father still gets by with his 8086, because he can still run the antiquated version of AutoCAD he never grew out of. He became, I'm afraid to say, comfortably numb.

      (In full disclosure, I still do most of my writing on an Apple eMate 300 -- because it has a terrific battery life and does what I want it to do.) I'll wager you a peso that in 2019 computers won't look ANYTHING like they do today. Because just when you think you've reached the perfect solution, something new and better comes along.

    54. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by GPool · · Score: 1

      Too true. :(

    55. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Atario · · Score: 1

      JVC does make the best VCRs

      In fact, it was specifically their crappy VCRs that gave me the wisdom never to buy anything from JVC again. After having had four top-of-the-line SVHSes (~$600 per) develop incurable picture problems within a year of purchase, I vowed never to darken their coffers again.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    56. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      Just to add, I remember the Video Toaster fondly. Granted, it was a niche platform; not something that would really propel the Amiga into homes in the '90s, but by '94-96 when I and many others were using 3D Studio (later 3DS Max) and Lightwave on the PC, there was less of a need to rely on the Amiga.

      That is true, but not just because of the amiga. NewTek did some very good things, and are still around as a company, while there current line runs in XP.

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
    57. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by nubbs · · Score: 1

      Thanks. We did a good pile of serious thinking to get it where it was. The Commodore purchase was necessary as we were out of money and Atari was about to kill us. I guess we were dead either way. But still, the great thinking of the designers lives on. Thanks.

    58. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me neither. Atari ST was developed to use Amiga coprocessors, but when that deal fell through, Atari had to scramble to replace them with other chips.

      The ST never used Amiga coprocessors at any point in its design process. The early history of the ST and the Amiga was intertwined, but only at the corporate / money level, not the technological level.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atari_520ST#Amiga_contract

      In summary, the ST was designed by Tramiel Technologies engineers (former Commodore engineers who left with Jack Tramiel when Tramiel departed Commodore), who became Atari employees when Tramiel bought Atari.

      The Amiga was designed by a startup partially funded by pre-Tramiel Atari; the startup's engineering team was essentially ex-Atari. When Tramiel bought Atari to get its operations network to bring his new computer to market, he also acquired Atari's interest in Amiga, and was close to acquiring full rights to Amiga before Commodore swooped in and bought Amiga out.

      I've never heard of a version of this history in which there was any exchange of ideas or technology between the two engineering teams. They each did their own thing.

      (The irony is that had Tramiel not left Commodore due to executive infighting, Commodore would've made the ST (or something like it) and Atari would've had the rights to Amiga, though it's unclear what they would have done with said rights given the ineptitude of the Time Warner ownership. Instead, Commodore and Atari effectively swapped 16-bit platforms.)

      The replacements were adequate, but not at the same level as the actual Amiga. The video was bland; the sound was little better than the old Pokey chip from 70s computers.

      The Pokey chip (and the rest of the Atari 8-bit chipset) was, ironically, the technological father of the Amiga. The ST just used a standard off-the-shelf Yamaha YM-2149 sound chip.

      I suspect a lot of the users were simply being loyalists. They owned Atari 400s/800s, and then upgraded to a 16-bit machine without considering any other brand except Atari. Later they tried to justify their mistake...er, purchase.

      A lot of the users were simply being pragmatic. The ST was dramatically cheaper than the Amiga, and it could do most of the things Amigas could, if not as well. Amiga was also hurt badly by how terrible the early versions of AmigaOS were; the OS was a much more interesting design than Atari's TOS (which was assembled from off the shelf components much like the hardware), but the actual implementation of AmigaOS was legendarily bad in the early days. (And the GUI was... well, the less said the better.)

      The hardware battle wasn't as one-sided as you think, either. CPU performance mattered. Atari had a win there: the Amiga was clocked at 7.16 MHz, the ST at 8.0 MHz, and (more importantly) the ST had a double-speed 16 MHz memory system which interleaved chipset access with CPU access, such that the CPU and chipset could access all memory with zero wait states. The Amiga partitioned its memory into 'fast' and 'chip' RAM, with the chipset only able to access 'chip' memory, and the CPU taking a significant penalty to access 'chip' memory.

    59. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure who you are, read your profile and there aren't any hints there. But if you were on the design team for Amiga, all I have to say is Wow. And thank you.

      I have never owned a computer that I've enjoyed more. It was miles ahead of everything else. It made those IBM beige boxes look pathetic.

      The design was absolutely elegant.

      And it still makes my PC with it's Athlon X2 4400 look silly in a way. The PC has roughly 2*2.20Ghz/8mhz = 550 times the computing power of my old Ami. But it sure as hell doesn't have 550 times the performance. Pound for pound the Amiga is probably one of the best computers that has ever been.

      So thanks for the great machine. I still miss her.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    60. Re:Don't knock the Amiga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are welcome. I still have one. I have not turned it on in a few years (its high on a top shelf in my office, always visible, to remind me of the great old days). Every once and a while, one of the other Amiga guys borrows it to take to a show, and it still works. It is serial number '1', I carried it home from Japan on my lap after the ceremony. Flying was a different experience back then. I tried to get it a home at the San Jose Computer Museum, but they said no to my conditions. I wanted it on and running all the time, with the keyboard and mouse accessible to the kids that visited the museum. But, nope, they wanted only a unit for the storage shelf. So I have kept it here.
      As to who I am, I find myself still shying away from most recognition, but I do enjoy the puzzle.
      If you like, we can play 20 questions. I will be honest and direct. If its too frustrating to play (and I know how that gets) just tell me and I will let you know.

      A starting hint: My first job at Amiga was 'clean up guy' in the lab. I swept the floors, put away tools, moved stuff around.

      And, yes, Nubbs was really my nickname then, although its not now.

  19. UV Light by White+Flame · · Score: 1

    It's kind of cool that raw UV exposure is the commonly accepted culprit of yellowing, and the restoration process involves basking the gelled surface in UV as well.

  20. Osborne 1! by ninjagin · · Score: 1

    Oh, an old Ozzie one! My heart leapt at the sight of it, as if I had seen an old friend. It's a shame I don't have mine anymore.

    --
    .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
    1. Re:Osborne 1! by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      My O1 died a few months ago. Just displays random garbage on the CRT with a constant whine coming from the speaker. I still have the carcass and full set of floppies.

      Compare that to the life of newer laptops or portables. That thing was built in 81.

    2. Re:Osborne 1! by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      The Osborne 1 is old hat. I'm holding out for the Osborne Executive.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    3. Re:Osborne 1! by ninjagin · · Score: 1

      You are clearly ahead of the curve. I find your insights quite cromulent. I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
  21. The only thing that I will let touch my Amiga... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is the ShamWow.

  22. Did you try oven cleaning foam? by abrax5 · · Score: 1

    My sister's bf refurbished his monitor by using classic oven cleaner foam. Excellent results.

    1. Re:Did you try oven cleaning foam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will only help if it is dirty or stained by nicotine. You cannot simply just clean it when the plastic itself is discolored from UV.

    2. Re:Did you try oven cleaning foam? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Fact: Oven cleaner and bleach are the only two household chemicals you will ever need.

  23. tooth whitening anyone? by DnemoniX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Really sounds like tooth whitening gel to me. Some of those procedures use high energy light to excite the peroxide which speeds up the process.

    1. Re:tooth whitening anyone? by evanbd · · Score: 1

      No way am I smearing urea-based chemicals all over my precious computer hardware. Keep your piss off my computer and in you tooth-whitening paste where it belongs!

    2. Re:tooth whitening anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, you're on slashdot. We know your keyboard is covered in bodily fluids anyway.

  24. One man's patina... by RevWaldo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...is another man's sickly yellow. The basic rule of thumb for antiques/collectibles is to never remove its patina e.g. all that crap that's built up on its surface over the years, as it's an undeniable indication of its age (plus sometimes it just looks cool.)

    Then again, vintage car fans don't hesitate to break out the paint and the rust remover.

    Will diehard technology collectors prefer plastic as yellow as a smoking lounge drop ceiling, or returned to its brilliant off-whiteness?

    1. Re:One man's patina... by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      Depends on how many times you can 'restore' the equipment before the chemicals used damage the plastic.

    2. Re:One man's patina... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah but the process is reversible back to the brown. All you need is 1 uv lamp... Which you conveniently have if you are using this process.

    3. Re:One man's patina... by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "Then again, vintage car fans don't hesitate to break out the paint and the rust remover."

      That's not exactly true - if a car has original paint, it's worth more money. You just polish it so it looks like new.

      Likewise on old furniture and guns - refinishing bad, cleaning and polishing good.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    4. Re:One man's patina... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I ran into this veiwpoint when someone asked me about polishing an old and relatively expensive sword - I made the mistake of telling him what seems like the obvious act that you are removing a bit of the surface to polish it. Here as well you are damaging the plastic - the secret is to damage only a few microns in depth just like polishing.

    5. Re:One man's patina... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just not true. I have a friend with a genuine 60s Mini Cooper whose paint looks like crap... but he won't respray it because it was the original.

  25. Oh sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... if you want your computer to be part-Cylon.

    1. Re:Oh sure... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      ... if you want your computer to be part-Cylon.

      If it's not the "kill all humans" part, who wouldn't?

      Though now that I think of it, by Friday that part will probably sound pretty good too...

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  26. Now my film can take place... by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

    I have a greenlight from Hollywood to film the Jack Tramiel Story. Starring Jack Black as Tramiel. It's a heartwarming story of him escaping the Warsaw Ghetto and Nazi oppression (cameo by Ralph Fiennes as Josef Menegele) and headed to the Bronx to repair office machines.

    The film ends in Triumph as he founds Commodore and wins over Bill Shatner (played by Bill Shatner of course) to be his spokesperson.

    The only thing holding back production was that nobody in Hollywood could get an old C64 to look fresh again.


    THANK GOD MAN! THANK GOD!

    1. Re:Now my film can take place... by machine321 · · Score: 1

      The film ends in Triumph as he founds Commodore and wins over Bill Shatner (played by Bill Shatner of course) to be his spokesperson.

      That won't work, Bill Shatner looks too young for that part. Too much hair too.

    2. Re:Now my film can take place... by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

      His agent assures us that Bill can reach for that "extra something"

  27. Didn't know this was a problem by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    The last time I confronted this, I used a little Simple Green and a bristle brush. The part looked brand new in seconds. I guess I could've waited a decade for someone to invent a workalike, but it didn't occur to me.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  28. TRS-80s?! by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

    Holy sh*t! TRS-80s? Boy, are YOU showing your age. Wait ... I used to work on those things.

    Aw, damn. {whimper}

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  29. RTFA - not bleaching by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    It's not bleaching - they use it to undo the yellowing chemical reaction on a gray Atari 130XE. It goes from yellow-brown right back to gray.

    It's absolutely amazing.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:RTFA - not bleaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It IS bleaching, dipwit. Simple chemistry.

    2. Re:RTFA - not bleaching by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      Really? Go back and look at those Atari pictures. The gray is darker after the process.

      I challenge you to get a sun faded t shirt and bleach it back to a darker color. Let me know how that works out for you.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    3. Re:RTFA - not bleaching by machine321 · · Score: 1

      Huh, they turned a C64 into an Atari.

    4. Re:RTFA - not bleaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really.

      The pictures actually aren't that good. Compare several of the before and afters, and not only does the plastic change, but so does the background. Go ahead...take a closer look yourself.

      The lighting on many of the before and afters is not the same. Apparently some is under incandescent, some under florescent, and others probably swamped by flash. Or some may have been over-worked in something like photoshop. In any case, the lighting and other camera settings were not held constant for the photos, which diminishes their worth.

      Also, much of the yellowing they're seeing isn't due to UV, but also to cigarette smoke. UV yellowing doesn't make it to all sides and underneath of a device like cigarette smoke will. Of course, a bleaching agent helps take care of that.

    5. Re:RTFA - not bleaching by mollymoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      The in-depth explanation of the chemistry on the site describes the relevant reaction as a reduction of the free bromine produced when the flame retardant decomposes.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    6. Re:RTFA - not bleaching by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      It IS bleaching, dipwit. Simple chemistry.

      I don't think by definition it is. The process restores the plastic color by removing (or reversing) the yellowing process. When dark hair gets "sun bleached", you don't attack the hair with a bleaching process again to restore the dark color.

      For the plastic, they are reversing the effects of the bromine "free radicals", created from UV exposure, that move to the surface of the plastic in search for oxygen to bond to. The bromine content, and it's location in the ABS plastic, is what's creating the yellowing.

      The chemical process replaces the oxygenated bromine (bromide?) with hydrogen. You now have bromine bonded with hydrogen. This has both a stronger bond than with oxygen, and changes the chemical properties (it's not yellow anymore). The original plastic color remains.

    7. Re:RTFA - not bleaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't get it. The bromine complex is what's being bleached out.

      Sheesh....amateurs.

  30. The story goes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else read this as:

    Someone online "discovered" that others had cleaned the plastics using hydrogen peroxide and decided to do the same, then proclaim that they had discovered a way to clean the plastics and generusly donate the recipy to the public?

    Where exactly is it that they did anything more special then a google search to figure out that others had already solved the problem?

    1. Re:The story goes.. by fan777 · · Score: 1

      I think the story here is that they figured out a way to make it into a gel so rather than dunking a large item into a bath of H2O2, you can paint / smear it on. At least that's what I got from reading the summary.

    2. Re:The story goes.. by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      They also added a catalyst so that it can be done in a reasonable timescale.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  31. I know some politicians and actresses who should by rcamans · · Score: 1

    I know some politicians and actresses who should try it out. They need it bad.

    --
    wake up and hold your nose
  32. Pluses and minuses by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What you're doing is applying an oxygenating bleach to the surface. Works quite well to remove the yellow. But anytime you apply oxygen to a surface you speed up the rate of .... oxidation!

    So while you're whitening it, you're also speeding up the deterioration of the plastic.

    If you've ever used an "ozone generator" to remove smoke odors you know it does that job very well, and it also destroys every rubber band, ballpoint pen, and bicycle tire in the area.

    1. Re:Pluses and minuses by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Use this shit in an office and every printer/copier/etc will need new rollers.

    2. Re:Pluses and minuses by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      My gut reaction to this process in general is that it sounds cool and useful... but that it might be a good idea for most people to wait a few years before doing it en masse- just to see what (if any) side unforeseen effects it's had on the restored computers.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    3. Re:Pluses and minuses by rhook · · Score: 1

      Plastics photodegrade, I doubt oxidation speeds up this process.

    4. Re:Pluses and minuses by chiark · · Score: 2, Informative

      I *think* that it's not oxygenating at all: the chemistry is replacing oxygen that is bonded to a bromine (or bromide? dunno) compond with a hydrogen compound. Or something like that.

      I think it's absolutely not oxidation: the "vanish oxy action" is used for its TAED content which may act as a catalyst, not the oxygenating properties.

    5. Re:Pluses and minuses by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      IANAC (chemist), but I have 4 amigas and have been following this topic with great interest on the amiga forums. From what I understand, this isn't oxidizing anything. Rather, it's unoxidizing. The ultraviolet light destabilizes the oxygen atom on the fire retardant chemical. The peroxide ensures that there's a convenient place for the oxygen atom to go.

      Also, you're right about the catalyst. It's added to speed up the process.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  33. Whitening by Mishotaki · · Score: 1

    Was that the process that Michael Jackson used?

  34. So why couldn't they patent this? by k_hokanson · · Score: 1

    was it because it was 'published' on the internet or something? Ethics? Just because they didn't want to?

    At least in the US, I know that Processes and Compositions are patentable.

    I suppose I should just ask them.

  35. Re:Wow. Bleaching. How novel!! by idontgno · · Score: 1

    More to the point, how the TRS-80 got that predominant color: paint. Silver satin paint over, I think, gray ABS.

    Try their "Oxy boost" peroxide experiment on a TRS-80 and see what you get. I'm sure it won't be minty-mint.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  36. Re:From the wiki ... At first i thought by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Polyrazzmatazz... PolyGLYCOAT... Polyrazzmatazz... PolyGLYCOAT.... (too damn many TV commercials in my Texas youth)

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  37. Re:Wow. Bleaching. How novel!! by styrotech · · Score: 1

    More to the point, how the TRS-80 got that predominant color: paint. Silver satin paint over, I think, gray ABS.

    Yep, I remember the paint wearing off in front of the keyboard on my fathers Model III - must've been due to playing too many games of Cosmic Fighter and Meteor Mission hehe. Under the speckly silver paint it was light grey plastic.

  38. There's existing alternatives by scdeimos · · Score: 1

    Twenty years ago or so, when I was working as a tech in an Apple Service Centre, we were using a leather softening agent for saddlery called "Gee-Y" (or "Gee-Why" depending on what part of the world you're from) to clean the ABS cases of hardware like this. A rag dipped in Gee-Y used to polish the burn out.

    Worked brilliantly for restoring the original colours of computer equipment that had been getting browned from sitting in direct sunlight, and it wouldn't affect the printing on cases and key caps.

  39. This post needs the boing ball icon. by keptwench · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember seeing one here on slashdot a few years back. if you don't know what a boing ball is/was, don't talk to me about Amigas. :)

  40. Re:you can tell kdawson didn't bring this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    didn't they fire all you guys? how do you remember which site you're trolling on?

  41. This might not be a good idea. by sleepy_sanchez · · Score: 1

    Are we 100% sure that this is not the Cylon gooey matter? Rogue AIs and networked computers don't mix.

  42. Value in whose eyes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That as always depends very much on how you judge the value...
    Are you interested in the monetary value?
    Or are you more interested in the value to you?
    Or perhaps you'd just as well have a newly produced one, if you could.
    And of course to some people only the tech counts and an emulator is as good as the real deal.

    It's the same question as to what to do with a Roman house... leave it in the ground? Carry it to a museum? Leave it derelict in the landscape? Or build an imitation at a new site as an amusement park? I've seen Roman buildings in all these states and I must stress that at least to me these approaches are all valuable in their own way.

  43. This is great news. by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

    I could use something to soften old vinyl cables used on 40 year old Tektronix gear. I have a few probes (P6032, P6042) that have stiff cables. This is bad because it puts a lot of strain on the conductors inside since the cable no longer flexes as before.

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
  44. Obligatory Nelson quote: by rts008 · · Score: 1

    Ha! Ha!

    LOL!! Until your post on this thread, I was happily remembering helping my buddy code a war game in BASIC on his TRS 80. He was converting the table top w/dice(think D&D style game in WW2, with rulebook and dice taking the DM's place) game they developed/modded into a computer game. The goal was to recreate the tabletop game on the PC.
    The idea came about from the group playing chess with each other over modem. LAN COOP play in the early/mid 1980's!
    The game was very similar to what ended up as Panzer/Allied/People's General style turn-based strategy games in the 1990's. (not claiming 'me first!!', just trying to provide a reference for what we were doing on the TRS80)

    Good times! But now thanks to you, I too am showing and feeling my age. Oh yeah, "you insensitive clod!". Almost forgot...damn senility is messing with my mind. No, I don't mind. What? Wait, is this a trick question? Who are you?...

    'Have pink flamingo, will travel'[Harry Aldrich]

    I hope to be Harry someday...(movie worth watching-good family fun!*spoiler* especially watching 'mom and pop' find ways to get themselves killed for the insurance money)
    Good Clean Fun(tm), yet still entertaining...a recommended 'must see', if convenient.(purely dished up as IMHO)

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  45. Bingo - exactly by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah basically, but the Mac was missing the key element of "helper" coprocessors.

    That's it exactly. Amiga was years ahead of the competition. The design was simply brilliant. We didn't have a lot of speed. The processor is 8 freaking MHz. But with clever and elegant design, the thing could do miracles.

    And the thought I have now is - what if this had been the main thrust of computing? What if this had become the dominant design paradigm? Add 20+ years of work and research onto that idea rather than the IBM beige box. Take the Amiga design concept and move that into a 3Ghz processor realm, with nVidia doing the Angus chip equivalent.

    Computers today would look like the things we see in sci-fi movies. It'd be unreal.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Bingo - exactly by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      I was just looking at an old Windows 95 laptop on Ebay, which ran at 33 megahertz and 12 megabytes of RAM.

      It was only 1 dollar so I almost bought it and then I thought, "Why?" Even though it has better specs, that Win95 machine can't do even half as much as an Amiga with just 8 megahertz and 1 meg of RAM. Windows 95 was the first decent IBM-compatible OS, but still inferior to the Amiga and Mac operating systems of the same period.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:Bingo - exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the thought I have now is - what if this had been the main thrust of computing? What if this had become the dominant design paradigm? Add 20+ years of work and research onto that idea rather than the IBM beige box. Take the Amiga design concept and move that into a 3Ghz processor realm, with nVidia doing the Angus chip equivalent.

      What makes you think the modern 'beige box' isn't just what you want?

      Agnus contained:
      * Blitter
      * Copper
      * Video timing generator
      * Clock generator
      * DMA controller
      * Memory controller

      A modern PC has every single one of these things, in a form which makes the original Amiga chipset look like a crude flint hand axe next to a modern assault rifle.

      (Actually, I take that back. Modern graphics chips have no direct equivalent to the copper. But that's mostly because the copper is a hopelessly obsolete concept today, rather than a deficiency in their design. For that matter, the blitter is kinda vestigial these days and may have even been replaced in recent designs by writing shader programs to emulate one.)

      Old Amiga enthusiasts sometimes get trapped in worship for the good old days and imagine that the Amiga's design was something almost mystical. It wasn't, it was just hardware. What's more, it wasn't nearly as revolutionary as you guys tend to think. (If for no reason other than the fact that Amiga was Jay Miner's second computer design, and his first -- the Atari 8-bit series -- has some very obvious family resemblances.)

      Much of the stark contrast between Amiga and the IBM PC had to do with different goals, not supreme mastery of technology. IBM had no interest in designing their computers to use fuzzy low res TV sets to display games or full color images. They were targeting boring business applications. Therefore they designed for their target: high res monochrome monitors suitable for displaying a lot of very legible text which could be stared at for hours without eye fatigue. Early Amigas literally could not do that, just as PCs could not wow you with an amazing game. Do you really think IBM could not have designed something like the Amiga if that was their goal? They just didn't do it because they were IBM.

      But now, 25+ years later, IBM doesn't steer the PC, requirements for business and fun computing have converged, and the result is that even the cheapest PCs with video chips that most geeks turn their nose up at (Intel integrated graphics) have capabilities which would've astonished the Amiga engineering team in 1985.

      And no, the result wouldn't be fundamentally better if it had evolved from the Amiga rather than the PC. Besides the fact that the modern PC has very little left in it from 1982, if you're pining over the lack of coprocessing hardware, you're not paying attention: we've got so much of it available today it's not even funny. There are high end graphics cards capable of over a teraflop peak computing throughput. The Amiga had nothing on a modern GPU. Nothing.

  46. enough with the "saved apple" BS by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    Apple would have gone bankrupt too (goodbye Macintosh) if it had not been saved at the last minute by Gates.

    Gates didn't "save apple". Microsoft bought $150M in non-voting-rights stock.

    At the time, Apple had BILLIONS of dollars in CASH (well, not real cash, but in bank accounts of course.) It was losing money, but it wasn't in need of a bailout or rescue- and the money "bought" MS a couple of things, one of which was IE being the default shipping browser. More info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Apple#The_Microsoft_deal

    Let me make that perfectly clear: the amount of money involved in the deal was insignificant to BOTH parties, and Microsoft got what it paid for.

    Furthermore, Office for the Macintosh has always been one of Microsoft's most profitable products.

    PS:It wasn't Jobs that was responsible for OS X. It was Amelio- he bought NEXT after BeOS stuck its thumb up at Apple and demanded a fortune. Jobs repaid the favor by manipulating the stock price and ousting Amelio.

    1. Re:enough with the "saved apple" BS by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      I edit my previous sentence so I don't offend the Christians... ooops, I mean the Apple zealots:

      >>>Apple almost went bankrupt too (goodbye Macintosh).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:enough with the "saved apple" BS by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      PS:It wasn't Jobs that was responsible for OS X. It was Amelio- he bought NEXT after BeOS stuck its thumb up at Apple and demanded a fortune. Jobs repaid the favor by manipulating the stock price and ousting Amelio.

      That's one way of looking at it, but there's a lot of truth in the saying that NEXT bought Apple for -$400m.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    3. Re:enough with the "saved apple" BS by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let me make that perfectly clear: the amount of money involved in the deal was insignificant to BOTH parties, and Microsoft got what it paid for.

      If the money involved in the deal was insignificant to both parties, then why did money change hands, and why did Microsoft actually get something for it other than a big lump of stock? I call shenanigans.

      PS:It wasn't Jobs that was responsible for OS X. It was Amelio- he bought NEXT after BeOS stuck its thumb up at Apple and demanded a fortune. Jobs repaid the favor by manipulating the stock price and ousting Amelio.

      From where I was sitting it looked very much like Apple wanted Jobs back, and Jobs came with NeXT and no other way. But then, I wasn't an Apple fan at the time. I outgrew that when Apple was insulting us with 68040s.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  47. Hydrobromic acid by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    Some of their materials chemistry in the theoretical background there is a bit iffy, but the main thing that jumps out at me is that they reckon they're reducing bromine compounds (bromine oxides, which are brown) by converting them to hydrobromic acid. Of course I've not worked out the whole scheme yet, it's possible they're just forming bromate salts in practice, and it's tiny amounts anyway, but I'm curious as to how much (or little) hydrolysis of the polymer you get from that in the long run.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    1. Re:Hydrobromic acid by MerlinUK · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... I know I dumbed down the science a hell of a lot for the non-science folk, but even I doubt we are getting hydrobromic acid; I was just trying to get a concept across and didn't expect to be taken literally. We may be getting bromoacetic acid derivatives via a reaction of peracetic acid (from the TAED) with bromine, but without analytical kit to see what's happening it's hard to work out what it going on. Some high-powered chemistry help wouldn't go amiss here....

  48. Great, but what about the flame retarding property by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the flames still be retarded?

    Or not?

    Or even fueled by added oxygen in the material?

  49. Hi - Let the flamefest begin....... by MerlinUK · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hi, I am the guy that wrote the Wiki. Now, I know that there are skeptics out there and I may have over simplified the science a bit so that non-nerds can understand what's going on, but I am open to listen to anyone who can explain the chemistry that is actually going on in a coherent way. I may have made it too simple I suppose. Regarding the ABS polymer itself; consider that black car bumpers and trim are made from (yes you've guessed it) ABS. These tend to go white (not yellow or brown) over a long time in sunlight. This is the ABS polymer degrading to the hydroperoxide via oxidation. The computer parts only go white if you use too strong a peroxide solution, so what is reacting under UV so quickly? My theory is it's the TBBP-A flame retardant which is active under UV and decomposes. There is also the phenomenon of migration, where ingredients can move within the plastic matrix and eventually get to the surface. I believe that the degradation products of TBBP-A migraet through the ABS and this is what make it discolour as the molecules attract oxygen molecules. There have also been comments elsewhere that the site is a hoax and that the photos are faked; if this were so, how could the photographs post in the various forums threads I added to the Reading section of the Wiki this morning be faked? They aren't, simple as......... I know I risk feeding trolls with this but this isn't a hoax. As this uses properietary products as part of the mixture, it couldn't be patented, however, I suppose I could have patented the use of H2O2 with TAED in a use for treating plastic. I chose not to and so it was released for all into the public domain. Don't flame me; try it for yourself. Let the flaming begin...........

    1. Re:Hi - Let the flamefest begin....... by larpon · · Score: 1

      There have also been comments elsewhere that the site is a hoax and that the photos are faked; if this were so, how could the photographs post in the various forums threads I added to the Reading section of the Wiki this morning be faked? They aren't, simple as........

      I can see you are used to the amiga community's scepticism in regard to everything "new" they hear about :)
      It's almost a standard disclaimer you can attach if you bring any news into the community

    2. Re:Hi - Let the flamefest begin....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't trust this bull or the so-called guy who wrote the wiki.

    3. Re:Hi - Let the flamefest begin....... by chiark · · Score: 1

      I know he asked for the flamefest, but that's a tad obvious is it not? ;-)

  50. Re:now to try it on Lego pieces by cnj5 · · Score: 1

    I was bathing grey and white Lego pieces in just hydrogen peroxide and sunlight (outside) in 2005/2006. It took a few hours and worked very well but definitely needed something to speed it up.

    The Lego pieces don't seem to have been affected since doing this after just checking the model.

    I have used Brasso (liquid) or jeweller's rouge on bricks with fine scratches (build a wall and do a side at a time) to a least get finer lines in the same direction.

  51. Retr0bright by MerlinUK · · Score: 1

    There are fanboys everywhere, if you look hard enough ;) To be honest, We've been goven such a hard time about this, it's a wonder I got the motivation to write it up at all... Criticism is easy and requires no effort at all, actually coming up with a logical scientific explanation for this requires a lot more, and that's where the fanboys lose interest. This process works, I know it's related to bromine chemistry in the flame retardant, I just don't happen to have an HPLC or a GC at home to be able to prove this, that's all. Harpo at Atari Age is a more quaklified chemist than I and he was able to follow my reasoning and say that I was on the right track; it's just that it's a complex thing to pin down since there are so many ways the TBBP can react. nyhoo, don't take my word for it, prove it to yourselves....

  52. How to make the solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many parts of what to what? What concentration of Hydrogen Peroxide?
    thanks

    1. Re:How to make the solution? by MerlinUK · · Score: 1

      Read the Wiki - 10 to 15% H202 (40 Volume) - the recipes are in the Wiki.

    2. Re:How to make the solution? by chiark · · Score: 1

      Just a thought, but why not read the link? It's all in there, in the Wiki. I've had success with both 6 and 9%, and others have had success with as low as 3%.

      For me, an hour strong sunlight (I say strong, it's all relative: think February in Northern England) was preferable to overnight with a UV lamp... Not really surprising, I suppose.

      Get the stuff, be appropriately careful with it, and have a go.

      My results are at the eab gallery

  53. TRS-80's were painted.... by Skitt+1 · · Score: 1

    TRS-80's were painted silver. The stuff won't work on them properly.

  54. Why Super Nintendos Turn Yellow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This 2007 VC&G article covers the yellowing issue quite well. It was the first on the Net to examine the chemistry of plastic yellowing in plain english. I have the feeling it inspired the Retrobrite guys to do their amazing work:

    http://www.vintagecomputing.com/index.php/archives/189

    It also mentions many possible solutions to the problem (including Retrobrite) and preventative measures.

  55. Re:Great, but what about the flame retarding prope by Rozzin · · Score: 1

    Will the flames still be retarded?

    On Slashdot? Yes, surely there are plenty of retarded flamers....

    --
    -rozzin.