Beatles Rock Band Game Coming In September
An anonymous reader writes with news that The Beatles: Rock Band has gotten a release date: Sept. 9th. Today's announcement also included details about the contents of the game. Quoting Kotaku:
"The Beatles: Rock Band will allow fans to pick up the guitar, bass, mic or drums and 'experience The Beatles extraordinary catalog of music through gameplay that takes players on a journey through the legacy and evolution of the band's legendary career,' according to the release. The game will also have a limited number of new hardware offerings modeled after instruments used by John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison and Ringo Starr throughout their career."
They had some really good songs, and some really bad ones. I'd like to know which group it is. I'd consider getting it if its stuff like Yesterday and Sgt Peppers, but I have no interest in their boy band phase and stuff like "I want to hold your hand" and "She loves you yeah yeah yeah".
I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
FTFA: "Giles Martin, co-producer of The Beatles LOVE album project (2006), is providing his expertise and serving as Music Producer for the game..."
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/gotten FOr all those who troll about vocabulary, I ask: How can you be Freedom Fuckin Luving Indie Geniuses if you can't accept that it ourselves that contribute and construct a language. Language is more a people's right than anything in the constitution. The emergence of language comes about upon an organic self-organizing set of processes that act, survive, and change within and with sets of dynamic and chaotic constraining principles of human communication. Simply put, you cannot capture that dynamicism in a dictionary and grammatical guide.
A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.
I don't know about that - it seems like a great way of breathing life back into his music, bringing it to a new generation with no obvious drawback.
If I have to roll through the early 60's to get to some of their better stuff, I'll do it, so long as it's not 50/50 in terms of boy band and "experimental" music. Are they going to release a sitar style controller to document their time with Ravi Shankar? Some of those tunes were extremely "inspiring." I am honestly very pumped about this...now only if they release the Dead on a track pack for those of us with a PS2...
As much as I love the Beatles they weren't really known for their Raging Guitar solos or 8 minute Drum twatting sessions, and for me the best bits in both GH and RB were the difficult but rewarding sections that I really just don't seem to remember the Beatles having.
It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
Must...not...feed...the...trolls...
So I'm not even pushing my 30s yet, but I grew up on this stuff. As a kid I would go through my dad's vinyl collection and dub them to tape (yar, I be a pirate at a young age!). It's interesting that in my teenage years I still listened to them and noticed a lot of influences from the Beatles in some of the more contemporary music of the day.
Billy Corgan of The Smashing Pumpkins, for example, attempted a Sgt. Pepper's-esque album with Machina, and though I don't think it had the same effect, you could see him trying to take the band in a new direction by being this fictional psuedo-band like the Beatles did to get a refresh thirty years earlier.
And that's what makes them culturally significant--that thirty years after their disbandment and half of quartet are dead, their music still has a major impact.
We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
Does anyone actually like the Beatles?
I'm torn between a smartarse comment about bears, and another smartarse comment about the Pope...
Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
When Captain Morgan buried his ill-gotten gains on an island?
Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
This is all well and good but why should we have to shell out sixty dollars a game for each artist especially when the basic game already exists? Sure following in a band's footsteps might be nice but it is really a once and done thing whereas the general game (GH or RB) has much better replay value. Also, if one version of the game has certain songs and the next one doesn't, then you have to switch discs just to play certain songs. Rock Band did well when it allowed gamers to transfer RB1 songs to RB2 and for that and many other reasons RB will have my loyalty for a long time. What I would like to see is all the songs on this new game as DLC. That way I can still play the songs without having to switch discs in between. Why can't we just have one game that plays all the songs?
...shaped like a Hofner violin bass for those authentic McCartney riffs ?
Squirrel!
It just can't be a coincidence.
Month: Number nine...
Day: Number nine...
Year: Number nine...
does it come with a sitar controller?
I was amused that on the Slashdot home page, the Today/Yesterday links were right under the title for this story.
They're bigger than Jesus you know.
John Lennon (or rather, his reputation) had the "benefit" of being shot dead before he got old and did all the sell-outy and trading-on-their-past things that musicians do when they get older.
Wasn't his final (and "comeback" album that ironically probably led to his death) considered the rather drippy and MORish work of a contended family man? (Yes, it's often said that settling down and being happy ruins an artist's work).
Would he have sold out? Who knows.
"Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
what complete and udder waste of slashdot