Slashdot Mirror


Emulation Explosion On the PS3 Via Linux

Marty writes "The PlayStation 3 has recently seen an explosion of releases of emulators and games for the Yellow Dog Linux distro for PS3; once you have installed Yellow Dog Linux you then have the ability to try out MAME, SNES, Amiga, Dos, Commodore and Atari emulators (that's the tip of the iceberg) and such games as Quake 2, Duke Nukem 3D, Hexen 2 and Alephone. Time to start installing Linux on your PS3?"

69 of 425 comments (clear)

  1. Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yo, Dawg! I herd you like playin' consoles so I put a console in yo console so you can play while you play!

    I now feel somewhat happier.

    1. Re:Oblig. by Joebert · · Score: 2, Funny

      Install a Linux emulating emulator and ask: Yo Dawg, Y U playin ya self ?

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    2. Re:Oblig. by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You misspelled the typo. It's "I herd you liek[...]"

      I don't know how to feel about that...

      --
      It's been a long time.
    3. Re:Oblig. by RMingin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Grammar Nazis for internet memes. *Now* I have seen everything.

      --
      The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
  2. No by Tatsh · · Score: 4, Informative

    1. First of all, there are more options for PS3 then YD including Gentoo, Ubuntu, Fedora, and others.

    2. Access (due to Sony scared of people making good games for PS3 Linux for 'free') to the RSX (graphics card) is very restricted. A few firmware revisions ago it was accessible but of course that gets fixed. And without the latest firmware, you cannot play certain games.

    The PS3 is a flop anyway. If you want to emulate these mentioned systems, you are way better off with a PC, Xbox 1, or Wii.

    1. Re:No by Gerzel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Flop? I don't think that word means what you think it means.

      PS3 has made money. It might not have caught on like the creators hoped it would or like the PS2, but it is slowly getting its market share.

      It isn't a huge success story but I'd hardly call it a flop.

    2. Re:No by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'll drink to that. I got the NES and SNES emulators working on the Wii, and in all honesty I haven't played many modern games since. Getting back into the Megaman and Final Fantasy series is a pretty neat experience, especially on a new HDTV with a wireless controller. All my childhood dreams of having remote access to all of my games without having to blow in the cartridge have finally come true. Now kindly get off my lawn!

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    3. Re:No by Cyrcyr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not sure what your point is, but it is the "ecosystem" that is making money. If you sell something at a loss, but make more money on peripherals, you're still making money.

    4. Re:No by Cheapy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't know. When the company claims that a product is still for "early adapters" two years after it's release...that's almost flop-worthy.

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    5. Re:No by Elementalor · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, PS3 has not made any money and it may never make any.

      http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/IR/financial/fr/index.html
      Sony videogames division in the past three years (PS3 era+R&D, including PS2 and PSP):

      2006 ===== 75 (positive)
      2007 = -1,969 (negative)
      2008 = -1,265 (negative)
      2009 ===== 51 (positive)

      Total 2006-09 === -3,108

      (in million US$)
      http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=111003

    6. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Prove 100%? No.

      But analysts have priced out the cost of components in the PS3. They came to the conclusion that the PS3 costs about $1000 a unit, based on what information Sony has been offering.

      And by "analysts" I don't mean "random nerds on websites" I mean "financial analysts who do this for a living to try and offer valuable information to investors to determine the financial health of companies." It was on Slashdot a while back, I don't feel like dredging it up. A Google search will turn it up.

    7. Re:No by ShadowFalls · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You think that is great? Get a big screen TV and play Super Mario Bros. 3 on big world.

    8. Re:No by Tatsh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The one thing I hate about console-proponents is that they exist. Each console has its pros and cons. Just because you bought a PS3 instead of an Xbox 360 or Wii does not make you better than someone else. AFAIK, nobody is paying you to advertise for Sony either.

    9. Re:No by CarpetShark · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, PS3 has not made any money and it may never make any.

      I haven't been keeping track of consoles much, but I can imagine that being true, from how many kids I've (dismayingly) heard talking about their XBoxes. Also, many kids and adults (a niche market which Playstations have traditionally been strong in) have gone with Wii.

      I've definitely do idea on the veracity of those figures. BUT, even if they've lost a ton of money on PS3, there is perhaps still light at the end of the tunnel for Sony. They based it on Cell, which is designed to scale easily. If that really happened in practice, and if the PS3 didn't bypass all that and just use the raw power without the scaleability, then it should be a relatively simple process to make a PS4, based on their existing, mass-producible tech, but with a few more Cell chips on the bus.

    10. Re:No by MadKeithV · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is that early adapter a 9v, 12v or 220v? Would running a higher voltage make my PS-3 faster?

    11. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      > It was on Slashdot a while back

      Yes, it really was a very long while back.

      You obviously haven't noticed the several revisions it has went through since then.
      It is significantly cheaper for them to build it now.

    12. Re:No by supernova_hq · · Score: 5, Informative
      You mean like:
      • Raw Power
      • Linux install in the freaking menu (no cracking required)
      • Standard USB cable for controller charging
      • Free online play (no subscription BS)
      • Nearly flawless upnp video/music/image viewer (no need to install xmbc, etc)
      • Power adapter is BUILT IN (standard desktop power cord goes straight in the back)
      • Very low failure rate (unline some other console out there)
      • Can be run 24/7 without heat issues (I do folding@home CONSTANTLY while not playing games on it with no problems)
      • card reader built into the front (5 or 6 in one)
      • Folding at home (sponsored by sony themselves) as a native app

      Remember, some of us actually have REASONS for picking a particular console!

    13. Re:No by Cowmonaut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      +1 Underrated / Insightful.

      That really can't be put more fairly, and is true more so now than in the past. The Xbox360, PS3, and Wii all have their high points and low points. For the Xbox, it seems to be getting "all" the games (and woo i get to use it as a bridge from my PC to my TV without buying a TV tuner card that wouldn't fit on my already fully loaded motherboard), the Wii gets a lot of "just plain fun" games that are also great with groups of people, and the PS3 gets some pretty games and is the only bluray player worth buying if Sony hasn't stopped changing the format already. And all of them get Rock Band / Guitar Hero which are a pretty solid money making fad (and unusually fun for a rhythm game).

      There's something for everyone. The pissing contest is kind of moot.

    14. Re:No by supernova_hq · · Score: 2, Informative

      First of all, ANY console in a closed cupboard will overheat, but leave a PS3 and XBOX360 in the middle of the floor, and there will be a CONSIDERABLE heat difference. You would think that moving the power adapter inside would make it warmer, which it probably does, but considering it's still cool to the touch after 4 straight days of gaming+folding@home is pretty remarkable.

      As for failures, it's true, I was mainly comparing it to the 360, but every person I know (save 1) who ever bought a wii played with it for a week (or maybe 2), then put it in the closet till they had a party. Wii fail less partly because the hardware is not as powerful (less heat), but mostly because you don't get as many hours worth of use out of them.

    15. Re:No by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      All this fanboy talk can cease.

      Sony's gaming division lost $1.24 billion in 2008. This means that anyone who lost less than 1.24 billion dollars in 2008 is more profitable than Sony's gaming division. Sony did NOT make money on the PS3 in 2008.

      That said, your other statement is more accurate. Third party developers have finally stepped up and begun releasing games people might actually want to play, and Sony finally lowered the price of the console, leading to an increase in sales of 156%. Their share of the market increased by about 5% in 2008, but it's still a tiny slice of the market.

      By most measures, the PS3 is a flop. It's trailing both it's competitors by double digits in market share, their gaming division is losing money while both competitors are making money hand over fist, and there's very little light on the horizon, since they're selling the most expensive console in the middle of a recession. The only real upside for Sony is everyone who wanted a Wii and 360 has bought one, so the PS3 is next on the list.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    16. Re:No by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know, when I bought my Wii, it was becuase it represented a new paradigm in gaming, and the games that were already available for it were incredibly fun and interesting.

      When I bought my 360, I knew it would be the PS2 of this generation, filled with the interesting titles other consoles wouldn't bother publishing. I just finished Braid this weekend.

      When I bought my PSP, I thought it was really cool I could hang out in front of a hotel and press a few buttons and have any one of a huge selection of playstation games at my fingertips for less than a meal at McDonald's.

      When I bought my DS, I was impressed by the massive library of dependably solid titles, as well as backwards compatibility with the GBA.

      So you're saying your PS3's power cable plugs right into it? That's great...

      --
      It's been a long time.
    17. Re:No by default+luser · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. The small EDRAM is not the sole reason games aren't pushing 720p. It's because the graphice hardware in both consoles cannot display 1280x720+ without giving-up framerate or details. Since details sell (why they keep increasing), and framerate is mandatory, designers have been pushing things at the cost of resolution.

      Even many PS3 games don't run at 720p these days, and there's no EDRAM to make that happen.

      I owned a 7900, and I'm well-aware of what it can do. Oblivion brought the card to it's knees (had to settle for 1152x864, medium settings, HDR). They were able to run it at 720p on the 360, despite the 10MB EDRAM limit, and despite the overhead of HDR.

      Today, games look even better than Oblivion, and take more graphics power to render. The only solution is to reduce the resolution, or your framerate will go all to hell.

      And no, Sony didn't intend Cell to supplement shaders - they intended Cell to BE the shader. That's why RSX wasn't added to the PS3 until the last-minute, once they realized that Cell wasn't fast enough to render 3D.

      And yes, you could use Cell to do supplemental effects, but that's a difficult undertaking: you have to properly synchronize the Cell thread so that the GPU isn't waiting on it, and you have to make sure that your shader isn't cannibalizing too much memory bandwidth (rendering is bandwidth-intensive, usually heavily-offset by the complex cache architecture of the GPU, something an SPE can't do).

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    18. Re:No by cbreaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't worry. There's a lot of PS3 haters out there, and they love to be heard. The folks that like the PS3 don't care enough to post how much they enjoy the system.

      I have a PS3 and I like it a lot. I don't play too many games on it, but I do play some. I play a lot of media with it - it's my main media head to my collecton of music, movies, etc. The uPNP media support is superb.

      I have played around with Linux on it a lot and it's great being able to do so. Boots a little slow, but it works pretty well.

      I like that I can attach any USB mouse, keyboard, drive, etc to it. I like that I can charge the controllers with my cell phone charger.

      And I have about 40 bluray movies to play on it so far.

      It's a great machine. Never a glitch or problem to speak of. It just works, and it's fun. I don't really care if 360 sales are higher. Why would anyone? Does that make the PS3 any less awesome to me?

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  3. Why do they always forget Freespace? by Vu1turEMaN · · Score: 5, Informative

    I cry everytime people don't remember the hardworking folks over at the Freespace SCP when it comes to Linux gaming....
    http://scp.indiegames.us/
    and
    http://www.hard-light.net/forums/index.php
    for more info.

    Over a million posts in their forum debugging an amazing game.

  4. Re:pist frost? rly? by socsoc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Fedora? Where do you get that? It's Red Hat/CentOS based.

  5. Linux on PS3? by DemonBeaver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I really can't see a good reason to install Linux on a PS3 except for once again proving that Linux goes on everything with a microchip. I'd rather buy a cheap pc for Linux, and have a working keyboard...

    --
    This message was brought to you by Sarcasm and Troll Feeders United (STFU)
    1. Re:Linux on PS3? by palegray.net · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm wasting mod points I used earlier in this story just to correct your idiotic point of view (I've seen this before, mostly from kids who have no clue that there's a world beyond gaming).

      Linux on PS3 clusters, used for scientific computing, is a huge success. Sony openly supported Linux from the start on their console with precisely this sort of work in mind.

      Get off the couch and go do something productive.

    2. Re:Linux on PS3? by Tokerat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      but why? why put yourself through the trouble of making it run, when you could run Linux on a computer way easier and keep playing games on the PS3?

      This is the fucking problem with geeks today, and why the dot-com boom ruined the tech scene.

      Why? Because you fucking CAN! There doesn't need to be a point. It's INTERESTING, and you can learn about a new system by doing it. Hell, maybe you'll even find a way to unlock the graphics hardware instead of waiting for someone else to do it so you can just download the patch and be all l33t.

      Now we've got all these lazy pseudo-geeks running around like "Oh, Linux on the PS3 is stupid, why not just use a PC?" and "Oh, pattern-recognition technology in video cameras is stupid, why not just use a bar-code scanner?" etc. Not sure if it applies to parent poster here or not (either way, shame on you, parent) but this is a result of all the people who went to school for computer science because it was the "hot new thing" and you could "get rich and retire when you're 30!". Now we have clusters of lazy, jaded nerds who resist change and new technology because they had a hard time leaning what little they know in the first place.

      </rant>

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    3. Re:Linux on PS3? by DemonBeaver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you are confusing actual research with "lets run Linux on everything including a toaster powered by a grandma on a hamster wheel". The PS3 is a gaming console. It was designed to run a specific type of software as smooth as (arguably) possible. You want to research it? Crack it? Fine. Have fun. Don't get all worked up over me buying it to play games on it. There are amazing technologies being developed as we argue here, but I doubt having emacs on a PS3 is creating the next great breakthrough.

      --
      This message was brought to you by Sarcasm and Troll Feeders United (STFU)
    4. Re:Linux on PS3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude, I would so love a Beowulf-Cluster of Linux Grandma powered toasters. Grandma would get her exercise. I would be able to start my toaster from my cellphone. Everyone would get toast. There could be toast preference presets that auto adjust with biometrics, I could sell my toast data to Google Trends and eat it too. EVERYONE WINS WITH GRANDMA POWERED LINUX TOASTERS!

    5. Re:Linux on PS3? by zwei2stein · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have seen what you loathe happen over and over again before .com. Your conclusions are too hasty.

      Certain percentage of geeks simply matures and "doing cool stuff" is not enough. Or maybe it is exposure to actual, non-academic, world of software development where cool ideas tend to work out as dumb waste of time.

      If you have your pet project, it also has to be useful. It needs to be something worthy your time when not with family/working. It ideally should give you job-translatable skills (haha). And you definitely do not want to reinvent wheel or spend time making someone elses reinvented wheel working.

      More on topic:

      Installing Linux on PS3 is easy. Installing emulators on Linux is easy. Its nothing to write home if you do both. Hell, its wasted time if you do it because you could be actually look for those hidden hardware gems instead making videos of you playing Mario.

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    6. Re:Linux on PS3? by numbski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're missing a very valuable piece of information here, which is that anyone that openly supports Linux on their platform deserves praise. Sure, it's annoying that they abstracted away the hardware, but STILL. They are trying to protect their IP (gawd, did I really just say that???), but instead of locking it down to the hilt, they provided abstraction and gave us Linux anyway. It's hard to complain about. Given time, that hardware abstraction will probably be bypassed for good - of course it will be after the PS3 is past it's prime, and despite the sales numbers, the hardware itself definitely has a few more good years under it.

      No - I won't open fire on Sony on this one. I really wish they would license the ability to get direct hardware access for a reasonable price for homebrew, but I won't hold my breath.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    7. Re:Linux on PS3? by numbski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Um...

      Why are you blaming this on the dot-com bust exactly? I can and should be as jaded as anyone else. I worked for a dot-bomb, and I've even since started, run, and failed at my own business.

      I don't think this has anything to do with dot-com, and everything to do with a trend that's been going on for a LONG time now: each generation is lazier than the last. The last generation had mortgages and homes, this generation didn't know the work involved and presumed buying a home was and should be easy, greedy people accomodated, and here we are: trashed economy (I'm over-simplifying of course). There are kids straight out of college (I'm only 10 years out myself!) that my wife administers at work, and their expectations of what they should have and be able to do while on business time is ridiculous. They're LAZY. I was and still am lazy to a degree, but it's as though they saw my lazy and took it to a whole new level.

      I'm not saying every single person coming out of college right now and for the last 3 years is a useless pile, but it's a trend that is going to continue - the next generation is going to see how lazy THIS one is and take THAT to a whole new level. The economy getting trashed like it is might be the best thing for us. Once upon a time, people were encouraged to grow gardens in their yards for food, to go out of their way to work not just for themselves, but the betterment of everyone around them. I would hope it doesn't come to that again, to people living in Hoover^H^H^H^H^H^HBushvilles, etc, but dang it - we all need to become less lazy.

      How does that translate? Well - "Linux on the PS3 is stupid, why not just use a PC?" really translates to "That's too much work, I can just use a PC instead." LAZY.

      Being a really good geek - I don't care what area of technology or science you work in - requires a desire to learn. You soak up new information like a sponge, and you're always looking for new information. The desire to hack something at it's core comes from that desire for new information, along with a healthy dose of ADD usually. ;) OOOH! New! Shiny!

      But hey, I'm talking like the old man here, and I'm 31. I've been in my career for almost 13 years now - did some of my time while still in college. If I'm talking this way about 21, 22, and 23 year olds now...woooh boy. My own niece and nephews, the oldest is soon to turn 12 - they're laziness just oozes from their pores. I'm sure I didn't appear much better to my parents, but the way they demand that everything be given to them without any work being required - it's not a value my family has bestowed upon them that I can tell. It's a societal trait.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    8. Re:Linux on PS3? by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Which frankly was about the stupidest damn thing they could have ever done! Hell I wouldn't be surprised if it was 360 supporters writing all those "supercomputing on PS3" articles, because Sony takes a bath on the sale of every PS3 and has to try to make it up in software(which last I saw the all important games-to-console sell through ratio was 8-1 for 360 and 3-1 for PS3 so they are getting crucified) and when you buy a cluster of PS3s they are taking a bath MULTIPLE times and are never going to see squat in profit because nobody is building clusters to game with, therefor no sell through. If I was the head of Sony the guy that came up with that "cluster of PS3s for supercomputing" BS would be living in a van down by the river.

      Of course the hard part for a PC gamer in all this "360 VS PS3" is that BOTH companies are giant douchebags so it kinda makes it hard to root for anybody. Sadly after the rootkit, the funky proprietary formats, and screwing PS3 owners by sticking an expensive BD player in the PS3 just to win a VHS/Betamax format war I'm going to have to go with Sony being the bigger douche this round. MSFT, after getting their asses royally handed to them over the RROD has at least boosted the warranty and from what my console gamer buddies tell me the new 360s are actually good. Sony on the other hand with their "we WANT the console to be hard to develop for" gets double douche points for trying to be elitist while being stuck firmly in last place everywhere on the planet except Japan.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    9. Re:Linux on PS3? by Nursie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Don't get all worked up over me buying it to play games on it."

      Umm, he's not, did you even read his post?

      He's getting upset at people criticising him for playing with linux on it. That's what. That all these people pretending to be geeks are now criticising folks for playing with new things on new systems.

      You want it to play games, fine, but asking why he plays with other options for it, telling him (or me for that matter) that it's stupid and a waste off time is not acceptable, intelligent or inquisitive.

      What if Torvalds had rolled over and decided Linux was a waste of time because it would be quicker just to buy windows?

    10. Re:Linux on PS3? by swillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Certain percentage of geeks simply matures and "doing cool stuff" is not enough. Or maybe it is exposure to actual, non-academic, world of software development where cool ideas tend to work out as dumb waste of time.

      This argument doesn't hold water.

      Yes, geeks mature, get families and jobs that take up a lot of time so they lose interest in doing geeky stuff "just because".

      But real geeks never lose the understanding that cool hacks are their own reward, and never start asking "why would you bother", because they remember when they would have bothered, and are perfectly capable of being impressed by the cool and the useless, even if they don't have time for it.

      No the "Why bother?" arguments come from the posers, who never did see the value in doing something just because it was there to be done.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    11. Re:Linux on PS3? by deek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are being a tad cynical, but I do generally agree with you.

      I've often thought about this issue. Each generation has generally been more prosperous than the last. This prosperity leads to levels of expectations that exceed the previous generation. We are, in a way, a victim of our own successes. Or, in other words, we're being spoilt.

      Each generation of children have been given more, without much effort at all. It's only human nature that they learn to expect to be given what they want. This is just a natural consequence of having a high standard of living, and is very difficult to overcome. It takes conscious effort on the part of the parent, to teach children that life will not give them what they want. That they've got to work hard to achieve their goals, and even then it's no guarantee.

      People, all people, not just children, generally appreciate what they had only after it's gone. This is the crux of the issue; the real difficulty of parenting. It's hard for a parent to deprive their child. You want to give your child every opportunity, want to make sure that they're well provided for, and that they have many choices in life. Problem is, if you give it to them, they cannot understand what they've been given. It has to be taken away before they can truly understand the value of it.

      I do believe it's possible to appreciate what you have, without being deprived of it. It takes conscious effort, and continual reminders. Giving thanks before meals is a good example, although I guess most people don't really listen to the prayer, but just recite it by rote. Another good example is to wake up every morning and think "how lucky I am that I have a bed, a house, and food on my table". It's not something I'd expect of children though, as it takes considerable maturity to really appreciate that statement.

      As far as children are concerned, it's a tough issue. Getting them to work for their basic needs can help. Education, in all forms, should also be able to increase their awareness. Not sure what else can be done, but whatever it is, I'm sure it'll involve hard work for parent and child. .... and to drag this post, kicking and screaming, back on topic ... I've already installed Linux on my PS3. Why? Because. No real reason, other than to experience it, to learn what it's capable of, and to have it as an option to solve a possible future need.

  6. from the like-your-very-own-time-machine dept. by skreeech · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most of those programs worked on the PS3 day one. I am not aware of what makes this a new development.

    --
    [20:36] wwwdot/.dotorg
  7. What explosion? by seebs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Please name an emulator which works on the PS3 today and didn't in 2007.

    "Explosion" implies that there are many such emulators, and that they all showed up recently. In fact, I don't know of any at all, and it's hardly an "explosion" for a Linux system to have access to a bunch of common Linux packages. What next? "Emulator explosion on the Eee" headlines because my specific Eee has access to more emulators than it did when I bought it?

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  8. The madness by hee+gozer · · Score: 3, Funny

    All those fancy cell cores with their gigahertzes and gigaflops, the hdd with its gigabytes and then bluray, just to play a game of Hunt the Wumpus! Hunt in shiny HD ascii!

  9. The reason is the same as it has always been by zaffir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The reason to put Linux on a PS3 is the same as it has been since release day: access to the wonderfully (sinfully?) complex Cell.

    If the thought of 6 128-bit wide vector processors hanging off the back of a general purpose CPU gets you all hot and bothered, the Linux on the PS3 is a great place to start.

    --
    "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    1. Re:The reason is the same as it has always been by Erwos · · Score: 2, Informative

      The parent here makes it sound like you should be able to just write a few lines of code and set a compile flag to have your program start using the SPEs on the Cell. That's completely untrue - you'd need to write some very specific, very custom code to use them, as they're basically just very fancy DSPs with regards to C coding.

      As a point of reference, no one's ported x264 to use the Cell for encoding, and that's the sort of application that the Cell is supposed to be very good with. IIRC, part of the issue was that each SPE only has 256kb of cache on it, which is rather marginal for high resolution rendering (you can't fit a whole 1080p frame into the SPE).

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
  10. Re:pist frost? rly? by diamondsw · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just because it's called Yellow Dog Linux v6, does NOT mean it's based on Fedora 6. Rather, it's based on the latest RedHat and CentOS code, and is much more similar to an upcoming version 6 of these products.

    --
    I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
  11. Re:Sweet! by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'd recommend not to. It's dog slow because you can only use 256 MB RAM, you don't have video acceleration, last time I checked I didn't have bluetooth (which means no wireless keyboard and mouse and no sixaxis), and Sony regularly (mostly unintentionally) breaks the system with firmware updates (at least up to the point you need to spend time to get it booting again). Unless you really want to program the Cell CPU Linux on the PS3 is pretty much worthless. Aside from some simple emulators for ancient systems you can forget doing anything useful on it.

    The PS3 programming scene is also about as dead as it can be. I've been lurking on ps2dev for years and it's still the same 5 people and nothing has really been achieved yet...

  12. Re:pist frost? rly? by hawkinspeter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Or you can try Xubuntu for the ppc - they now simultaneously release for the ppc architecture.

    --
    You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
  13. Re:Yay. by Tokerat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sony locked it down with a firmware update. My biggest complaint about Sony is they're not very friendly to homebrew game developers (not that any of the console makers are).

    And seriously? "It'll look stupid compared to someone running MGS4?" Is that REALLY supposed to compare? You don't find it in the least bit awesome that you can get all your favorite old games (that you own already, obviously) on your HDTV with a wireless controller? Are you really saying that the PS3 would be better if it did less? What kind of geek are you?

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  14. Re:linux on ps3 haha by Arker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why would I want to play 9 year old+ games on a new entertainment system?

    Someone who's noticed that most games these days suck perhaps?

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  15. Re:Sweet! by salmaklak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You've obviously never used Linux on the PS3 at all and are trolling. I've used my bluetooth keyboard on Linux with the PS3 since first installing it 2 years ago. That's on YDL, Ubuntu, and Fedora. Secondly, all the RAM has been usable for some time now so once again you are trolling.

  16. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bzzt.. Wrong...

    YellowDog 6.1 allows access to the GPU memory too...

    It's the only distro that ships with the kernel patches that allow it to do so, but there is nothing stopping any distro picking up the kernel patch.

    http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9858/

  17. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    not too much

    indeed you are right about bluetooth, but using the video mem is not of much help with the ram shortage

    why?

    because its video mem

    you can copy very fast into it, so swapping out to it works well

    -but- reading from it is painfully slow, and all in all using hdd's for swap is more convenient

    i wish we would get some more acceleration than using the cpu dma for pushing data around - that would make ps3 linux quite usable

    but in its current state it is really only for those usable, like me, who wish to train cell programming (which is not that difficult as some like to explain in the media)

  18. Re:Yay. by Giometrix · · Score: 2, Informative

    Much more friendly than the accursed Microsoft though, still no progress (real) towards Linux on there, makes me wish I bought a PS3 :-/

    Microsoft has the XNA API for homebrew games.... and they let you sell games on their network. I'd say that's pretty friendly.

    --
    Download free e-books, lectures, and tutorials at bookgoldmine.com
  19. Re:Sweet! by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I said 'last time I checked' the bluetooth did not work, after which I haven't bothered to check on it again because it was already obvious it sucks for anything but Cell development.

    And using the ps3vram driver you do _not_ have full access to the 256 MB video RAM, you can use it, but the bandwidth is terrible because it actually uses the GPU to DMA memory back and forth to a window in (directly accessible) XDR memory, because the bandwidth of the 2nd half of memory to the CPU is about 8MB/s (or something similarly slow, you get the point). The way it's used with ps3vram this is only useful as swap space, and even then swapping to the HD is almost as fast.

    You obviously don't really know much about how PS3 linux works at all and are astroturfing.

  20. Don't get too excited by themildassassin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It strikes me that people who try to hype up the PS3's emulation under linux have never tried it.

    I have, ignoring the large amount of tweaking to get a distro working properly with the PS3 hardware/HDTV (I've tried yellow dog and ubuntu), the emulation just isn't very good.

    At least with an NES emulator you'll be able to run a game at full speed. However, good luck getting it fit to the screen properly or get it working with PS3 gamepad (again more tweaking). Other systems, SNES, GENESIS, don't have an emulator that is going to run at full speed on the PS3.

    Other software suffers from the same problems, lack of selection and slow performance. Maybe this will change in the future, but right now linux on the cell isn't that great for desktop style apps. Yet I see it hyped up all the time, but people who either haven't bothered to try it, or are fine with a lot of tweaking for a extremely sluggish emulation/desktop experience. Just because you can do it, doesn't always mean that it is worth doing.

  21. Re:Wow, Guess That Makes The 360 A Massive Failure by supernova_hq · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does that 28.9M include replacements for the dead ones? ;)

  22. Re:Sweet! by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Depends on your idea of what is a fun game. If I can have an Atari 800 emulator and M.U.L.E. on my PS3, that pretty much doubles the entertainment value of the machine for my family.

    Yeah, GT5 is more impressive, but racing split-screen isn't nearly as easy or fun as playing a highly multi-player oriented game like M.U.L.E.

  23. Depends on the scaler by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You think that is great? Get a big screen TV and play Super Mario Bros. 3 on big world.

    Oh God, the pixels, the pixels are coming to get me!!!!

    It depends on which emulator you're using. If you're using the official Virtual Console emulator, it'll look blocky because vcNES uses nearest-neighbor resampling. But if you're using an emulator that supports Scale2x, hq2x, or some other smart resampling method for line art, you can get NES games to look better than TG16 in some cases and Super NES games to look nearly PS1-quality.

  24. Re:Can someone answer a few questions for me? by Tongsy · · Score: 2, Informative

    1. So, has anyone here tried using something like VLC or Mplayer to play h.264 and Xvid? Is playback smooth? Does it use Xv?

    When I tried it 10 months ago, it wasn't smooth at all. Xvid was good, though.

    Does the hypervisor restrict access to usb? Ie, will other devices such as an external hard drive and a tuner card work?

    No, it doesn't. External USB drives should work fine, as should your tuner card if you have the driver

  25. Re:Sweet! by Phasma+Felis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Only" 256MB RAM? Accurate or not, what do you think we're emulating here? The SNES had a total of 256 kilobytes of RAM, with cartridge ROMs topping at 6MB. Quake 2 ran on a Pentium/90 with 16MB.

    The PS3's specs might be a problem for a Windows box that demands half a gig for OS overhead, but Linux isn't supposed to have those problems.

  26. Re:Sweet! by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are several projects, like spu-medialib and mesa3d, which accelerate PS3 graphics/video on the Cell's SPEs. spu-medialib is actually a general framework for acceleration, while mesa3d offloads OpenGL onto the SPEs as a GPU. Why don't you put some of those people you say you're training to program the Cell onto those projects and give something back to the community that's given you the programmable platform?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  27. Re:Can someone answer a few questions for me? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are several projects, like spu-medialib and mesa3d, which accelerate PS3 graphics/video on the Cell's SPEs. spu-medialib is actually a general framework for acceleration, while mesa3d offloads OpenGL onto the SPEs as a GPU.

    There's a narrative tutorial for installing the spu-medialib mplayer driver, with links to files, that plays video on the SPEs quite well, including 1080p HD videos.

    The USB works fine, so an external HD should work fine. I don't know whether there are PPC (the Cell's application core) drivers for a USB tuner card, but you should try it. If it doesn't work, make it work with some programming. That's what Linux is all about :).

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  28. Great! Now where is my PS2 emulator? by chopper749 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As soon as I can play my PS2 games on a PS3, I might look into buying one.

  29. Re:linux on ps3 haha by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I disagree.

    We're in an age where some incredible games are being released. The indie scene is more alive than it's been since the days of Doom. When I bought my first indie game, Pontifex, back in 2000, it was a strange thing. Today, for the first time in history, you can actually buy an indie game right from your xbox. I bought Braid and N+ this weekend and it took about 20 seconds. The commercial scene has some incredible players, like Valve Software, who keep on churning out unique titles like Left 4 Dead and Portal.

    Sure there are brownfest WWII shooters, but that's always been the case. Download a rompack for the SNES and NES, and see how many games are actually any good. You'll be shocked at the massive amount of crap you have to sift through to find the diamonds.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  30. Re:Sweet! by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Listen, I've tried PS3 linux before, I know what the hardware is, and I know what the limitations of PS3 linux are. These have not changed (apart from the bluetooth thing), and these are not bound to change. ie: the 2nd half of memory will always be basically useless, and the RSX will never be fully accessible from PS3 linux.

    So effectively, there is no hope PS3 linux will get more useful than it already is, which is how it was when I checked it out. I've been running it for a few months which was about a year ago, and back then it broke 3 times on firmware updates. How you would know better how much time I spent with it eludes me...

    If you don't believe what I'm saying about PS3 linux: go ahead and try it anyway, I couldn't care less, not my PS3, not my spare time. Just find out yourself how terrific it works and how much I'm trolling here. Don't see why I would be trolling about PS3 linux on Slashdot anyway but hey, some people here obviously feel better screaming troll all the time.

  31. Re:Sweet! by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually I know the guy who's working on spu-medialib, he's unsolo from ps2dev.org. I've actually been exchanging some thoughts with him back when I was playing around trying to do video decoding on the PS3. Anyway, spu-medialib is far from complete and doesn't nearly make up for the lack of GPU acceleration, there hasn't been any major improvements since back when I was playing around with PS3 linux. You can still forget even getting 720p playback on PS3 linux. Don't know about the state Mesa/Gallium/anything else to do 3D on the Cell, but judging from the activity on PS3 dev forums there's nothing interesting for end-users there either.

  32. Re:Sweet! by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Informative

    I get 1080p HD playback (and all the lower frame/bitrates, too) just fine using unsolo's spu-medialib mplayer -vo driver on my PS3, as I have for about a year now.

    The mesa3d project is highly active, including this month, on their dev email list.

    There seems to be quite a lot of interest in PS3 programming to both developers and to end users - like playing video (directly to an HDMI TV) on a $400 PS3 that would crush a PC costing 2-5x as much, that includes all that other stuff like Blu-Ray, Bluetooth, and lots of games (in GameOS mode).

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  33. Re:Sweet! by Phasma+Felis · · Score: 2, Informative

    Quake 2 ran on a Pentium/90 with 16MB.

    Sure you're not talking about Quake 1 here (at least for software mode)?

    I didn't say it ran well. ;) You'd want a fair bit more to get best performance out of it, but 90mHz/16MB is the official minimum spec. Either way, the PS3 should have no trouble handling it.

  34. Re:Sweet! by Khyber · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of my pals here in SoCal is getting closer and closer to destroying the hypervisor restrictions. He's managed to get a few commands directly to GPU and memory, and once he figures out how to get all commands to it (although from what I'm told there is a performance hit of about 40%, for reasons I'm not technically competent enough to understand,) then it's going to be a much more fun system to play with. Hell, if I could run games and whatnot through the PS3 with Linux I'd unhook my PC from the TV and just let the PS3 handle it instead. There is serious power potential in the PS3. Sony should have unlocked it and dropped the price another 50 bucks. I'm willing to bet that would have a LOT of new customers coming to it.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  35. Re:Great! Now where is my PS2 emulator? by Khyber · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Buy the 80GB model, which does allow you to play PS2 games, natively as they added the hardware.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  36. Re:Sweet! by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 2, Informative

    You sound a lot like that unsolo dude himself you know? Like a Sony/IBM advertisement.

    Anyway, I'm not calling you a liar, maybe you do have some video's that somewhat work in 1080p, maybe you don't, I don't know but I highly doubt that you actually have a setup that reliably plays random 1080p videos. The reason is that no-one I know of can confirm an OSS player exists that can do that, and there's loads of people confirming even 720p MPEG with mplayer -vo ps3 is choppy and h264 is a slideshow. In other words just like it was a year ago. I can't find any videos on Youtube that seem very suspect to be fake either, and there's no-one on the dev forums saying he got 1080p h264 working either. But all the better if you can prove me wrong...

    If I'd be able to write a codec on the SPE's: I don't know. I gave up when all hope for GPU acceleration on linux was lost. Just like most other people hacking away at the PS3. There's hardly a scene left for PS3 linux, mostly straightforward porting of simple emulators, and besides that some research stuff like Gallium3D.