Slashdot Mirror


Emulation Explosion On the PS3 Via Linux

Marty writes "The PlayStation 3 has recently seen an explosion of releases of emulators and games for the Yellow Dog Linux distro for PS3; once you have installed Yellow Dog Linux you then have the ability to try out MAME, SNES, Amiga, Dos, Commodore and Atari emulators (that's the tip of the iceberg) and such games as Quake 2, Duke Nukem 3D, Hexen 2 and Alephone. Time to start installing Linux on your PS3?"

42 of 425 comments (clear)

  1. Oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yo, Dawg! I herd you like playin' consoles so I put a console in yo console so you can play while you play!

    I now feel somewhat happier.

    1. Re:Oblig. by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You misspelled the typo. It's "I herd you liek[...]"

      I don't know how to feel about that...

      --
      It's been a long time.
  2. No by Tatsh · · Score: 4, Informative

    1. First of all, there are more options for PS3 then YD including Gentoo, Ubuntu, Fedora, and others.

    2. Access (due to Sony scared of people making good games for PS3 Linux for 'free') to the RSX (graphics card) is very restricted. A few firmware revisions ago it was accessible but of course that gets fixed. And without the latest firmware, you cannot play certain games.

    The PS3 is a flop anyway. If you want to emulate these mentioned systems, you are way better off with a PC, Xbox 1, or Wii.

    1. Re:No by Gerzel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Flop? I don't think that word means what you think it means.

      PS3 has made money. It might not have caught on like the creators hoped it would or like the PS2, but it is slowly getting its market share.

      It isn't a huge success story but I'd hardly call it a flop.

    2. Re:No by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'll drink to that. I got the NES and SNES emulators working on the Wii, and in all honesty I haven't played many modern games since. Getting back into the Megaman and Final Fantasy series is a pretty neat experience, especially on a new HDTV with a wireless controller. All my childhood dreams of having remote access to all of my games without having to blow in the cartridge have finally come true. Now kindly get off my lawn!

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    3. Re:No by Cyrcyr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not sure what your point is, but it is the "ecosystem" that is making money. If you sell something at a loss, but make more money on peripherals, you're still making money.

    4. Re:No by Cheapy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't know. When the company claims that a product is still for "early adapters" two years after it's release...that's almost flop-worthy.

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    5. Re:No by Elementalor · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, PS3 has not made any money and it may never make any.

      http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/IR/financial/fr/index.html
      Sony videogames division in the past three years (PS3 era+R&D, including PS2 and PSP):

      2006 ===== 75 (positive)
      2007 = -1,969 (negative)
      2008 = -1,265 (negative)
      2009 ===== 51 (positive)

      Total 2006-09 === -3,108

      (in million US$)
      http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=111003

    6. Re:No by Tatsh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The one thing I hate about console-proponents is that they exist. Each console has its pros and cons. Just because you bought a PS3 instead of an Xbox 360 or Wii does not make you better than someone else. AFAIK, nobody is paying you to advertise for Sony either.

    7. Re:No by CarpetShark · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, PS3 has not made any money and it may never make any.

      I haven't been keeping track of consoles much, but I can imagine that being true, from how many kids I've (dismayingly) heard talking about their XBoxes. Also, many kids and adults (a niche market which Playstations have traditionally been strong in) have gone with Wii.

      I've definitely do idea on the veracity of those figures. BUT, even if they've lost a ton of money on PS3, there is perhaps still light at the end of the tunnel for Sony. They based it on Cell, which is designed to scale easily. If that really happened in practice, and if the PS3 didn't bypass all that and just use the raw power without the scaleability, then it should be a relatively simple process to make a PS4, based on their existing, mass-producible tech, but with a few more Cell chips on the bus.

    8. Re:No by MadKeithV · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is that early adapter a 9v, 12v or 220v? Would running a higher voltage make my PS-3 faster?

    9. Re:No by supernova_hq · · Score: 5, Informative
      You mean like:
      • Raw Power
      • Linux install in the freaking menu (no cracking required)
      • Standard USB cable for controller charging
      • Free online play (no subscription BS)
      • Nearly flawless upnp video/music/image viewer (no need to install xmbc, etc)
      • Power adapter is BUILT IN (standard desktop power cord goes straight in the back)
      • Very low failure rate (unline some other console out there)
      • Can be run 24/7 without heat issues (I do folding@home CONSTANTLY while not playing games on it with no problems)
      • card reader built into the front (5 or 6 in one)
      • Folding at home (sponsored by sony themselves) as a native app

      Remember, some of us actually have REASONS for picking a particular console!

  3. Why do they always forget Freespace? by Vu1turEMaN · · Score: 5, Informative

    I cry everytime people don't remember the hardworking folks over at the Freespace SCP when it comes to Linux gaming....
    http://scp.indiegames.us/
    and
    http://www.hard-light.net/forums/index.php
    for more info.

    Over a million posts in their forum debugging an amazing game.

  4. Re:pist frost? rly? by socsoc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Fedora? Where do you get that? It's Red Hat/CentOS based.

  5. Linux on PS3? by DemonBeaver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I really can't see a good reason to install Linux on a PS3 except for once again proving that Linux goes on everything with a microchip. I'd rather buy a cheap pc for Linux, and have a working keyboard...

    --
    This message was brought to you by Sarcasm and Troll Feeders United (STFU)
    1. Re:Linux on PS3? by palegray.net · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm wasting mod points I used earlier in this story just to correct your idiotic point of view (I've seen this before, mostly from kids who have no clue that there's a world beyond gaming).

      Linux on PS3 clusters, used for scientific computing, is a huge success. Sony openly supported Linux from the start on their console with precisely this sort of work in mind.

      Get off the couch and go do something productive.

    2. Re:Linux on PS3? by Tokerat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      but why? why put yourself through the trouble of making it run, when you could run Linux on a computer way easier and keep playing games on the PS3?

      This is the fucking problem with geeks today, and why the dot-com boom ruined the tech scene.

      Why? Because you fucking CAN! There doesn't need to be a point. It's INTERESTING, and you can learn about a new system by doing it. Hell, maybe you'll even find a way to unlock the graphics hardware instead of waiting for someone else to do it so you can just download the patch and be all l33t.

      Now we've got all these lazy pseudo-geeks running around like "Oh, Linux on the PS3 is stupid, why not just use a PC?" and "Oh, pattern-recognition technology in video cameras is stupid, why not just use a bar-code scanner?" etc. Not sure if it applies to parent poster here or not (either way, shame on you, parent) but this is a result of all the people who went to school for computer science because it was the "hot new thing" and you could "get rich and retire when you're 30!". Now we have clusters of lazy, jaded nerds who resist change and new technology because they had a hard time leaning what little they know in the first place.

      </rant>

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    3. Re:Linux on PS3? by DemonBeaver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you are confusing actual research with "lets run Linux on everything including a toaster powered by a grandma on a hamster wheel". The PS3 is a gaming console. It was designed to run a specific type of software as smooth as (arguably) possible. You want to research it? Crack it? Fine. Have fun. Don't get all worked up over me buying it to play games on it. There are amazing technologies being developed as we argue here, but I doubt having emacs on a PS3 is creating the next great breakthrough.

      --
      This message was brought to you by Sarcasm and Troll Feeders United (STFU)
    4. Re:Linux on PS3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude, I would so love a Beowulf-Cluster of Linux Grandma powered toasters. Grandma would get her exercise. I would be able to start my toaster from my cellphone. Everyone would get toast. There could be toast preference presets that auto adjust with biometrics, I could sell my toast data to Google Trends and eat it too. EVERYONE WINS WITH GRANDMA POWERED LINUX TOASTERS!

    5. Re:Linux on PS3? by zwei2stein · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have seen what you loathe happen over and over again before .com. Your conclusions are too hasty.

      Certain percentage of geeks simply matures and "doing cool stuff" is not enough. Or maybe it is exposure to actual, non-academic, world of software development where cool ideas tend to work out as dumb waste of time.

      If you have your pet project, it also has to be useful. It needs to be something worthy your time when not with family/working. It ideally should give you job-translatable skills (haha). And you definitely do not want to reinvent wheel or spend time making someone elses reinvented wheel working.

      More on topic:

      Installing Linux on PS3 is easy. Installing emulators on Linux is easy. Its nothing to write home if you do both. Hell, its wasted time if you do it because you could be actually look for those hidden hardware gems instead making videos of you playing Mario.

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    6. Re:Linux on PS3? by numbski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're missing a very valuable piece of information here, which is that anyone that openly supports Linux on their platform deserves praise. Sure, it's annoying that they abstracted away the hardware, but STILL. They are trying to protect their IP (gawd, did I really just say that???), but instead of locking it down to the hilt, they provided abstraction and gave us Linux anyway. It's hard to complain about. Given time, that hardware abstraction will probably be bypassed for good - of course it will be after the PS3 is past it's prime, and despite the sales numbers, the hardware itself definitely has a few more good years under it.

      No - I won't open fire on Sony on this one. I really wish they would license the ability to get direct hardware access for a reasonable price for homebrew, but I won't hold my breath.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    7. Re:Linux on PS3? by numbski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Um...

      Why are you blaming this on the dot-com bust exactly? I can and should be as jaded as anyone else. I worked for a dot-bomb, and I've even since started, run, and failed at my own business.

      I don't think this has anything to do with dot-com, and everything to do with a trend that's been going on for a LONG time now: each generation is lazier than the last. The last generation had mortgages and homes, this generation didn't know the work involved and presumed buying a home was and should be easy, greedy people accomodated, and here we are: trashed economy (I'm over-simplifying of course). There are kids straight out of college (I'm only 10 years out myself!) that my wife administers at work, and their expectations of what they should have and be able to do while on business time is ridiculous. They're LAZY. I was and still am lazy to a degree, but it's as though they saw my lazy and took it to a whole new level.

      I'm not saying every single person coming out of college right now and for the last 3 years is a useless pile, but it's a trend that is going to continue - the next generation is going to see how lazy THIS one is and take THAT to a whole new level. The economy getting trashed like it is might be the best thing for us. Once upon a time, people were encouraged to grow gardens in their yards for food, to go out of their way to work not just for themselves, but the betterment of everyone around them. I would hope it doesn't come to that again, to people living in Hoover^H^H^H^H^H^HBushvilles, etc, but dang it - we all need to become less lazy.

      How does that translate? Well - "Linux on the PS3 is stupid, why not just use a PC?" really translates to "That's too much work, I can just use a PC instead." LAZY.

      Being a really good geek - I don't care what area of technology or science you work in - requires a desire to learn. You soak up new information like a sponge, and you're always looking for new information. The desire to hack something at it's core comes from that desire for new information, along with a healthy dose of ADD usually. ;) OOOH! New! Shiny!

      But hey, I'm talking like the old man here, and I'm 31. I've been in my career for almost 13 years now - did some of my time while still in college. If I'm talking this way about 21, 22, and 23 year olds now...woooh boy. My own niece and nephews, the oldest is soon to turn 12 - they're laziness just oozes from their pores. I'm sure I didn't appear much better to my parents, but the way they demand that everything be given to them without any work being required - it's not a value my family has bestowed upon them that I can tell. It's a societal trait.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    8. Re:Linux on PS3? by swillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Certain percentage of geeks simply matures and "doing cool stuff" is not enough. Or maybe it is exposure to actual, non-academic, world of software development where cool ideas tend to work out as dumb waste of time.

      This argument doesn't hold water.

      Yes, geeks mature, get families and jobs that take up a lot of time so they lose interest in doing geeky stuff "just because".

      But real geeks never lose the understanding that cool hacks are their own reward, and never start asking "why would you bother", because they remember when they would have bothered, and are perfectly capable of being impressed by the cool and the useless, even if they don't have time for it.

      No the "Why bother?" arguments come from the posers, who never did see the value in doing something just because it was there to be done.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  6. from the like-your-very-own-time-machine dept. by skreeech · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most of those programs worked on the PS3 day one. I am not aware of what makes this a new development.

    --
    [20:36] wwwdot/.dotorg
  7. What explosion? by seebs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Please name an emulator which works on the PS3 today and didn't in 2007.

    "Explosion" implies that there are many such emulators, and that they all showed up recently. In fact, I don't know of any at all, and it's hardly an "explosion" for a Linux system to have access to a bunch of common Linux packages. What next? "Emulator explosion on the Eee" headlines because my specific Eee has access to more emulators than it did when I bought it?

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  8. The madness by hee+gozer · · Score: 3, Funny

    All those fancy cell cores with their gigahertzes and gigaflops, the hdd with its gigabytes and then bluray, just to play a game of Hunt the Wumpus! Hunt in shiny HD ascii!

  9. The reason is the same as it has always been by zaffir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The reason to put Linux on a PS3 is the same as it has been since release day: access to the wonderfully (sinfully?) complex Cell.

    If the thought of 6 128-bit wide vector processors hanging off the back of a general purpose CPU gets you all hot and bothered, the Linux on the PS3 is a great place to start.

    --
    "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
  10. Re:Sweet! by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'd recommend not to. It's dog slow because you can only use 256 MB RAM, you don't have video acceleration, last time I checked I didn't have bluetooth (which means no wireless keyboard and mouse and no sixaxis), and Sony regularly (mostly unintentionally) breaks the system with firmware updates (at least up to the point you need to spend time to get it booting again). Unless you really want to program the Cell CPU Linux on the PS3 is pretty much worthless. Aside from some simple emulators for ancient systems you can forget doing anything useful on it.

    The PS3 programming scene is also about as dead as it can be. I've been lurking on ps2dev for years and it's still the same 5 people and nothing has really been achieved yet...

  11. Re:pist frost? rly? by hawkinspeter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Or you can try Xubuntu for the ppc - they now simultaneously release for the ppc architecture.

    --
    You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
  12. Re:Yay. by Tokerat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sony locked it down with a firmware update. My biggest complaint about Sony is they're not very friendly to homebrew game developers (not that any of the console makers are).

    And seriously? "It'll look stupid compared to someone running MGS4?" Is that REALLY supposed to compare? You don't find it in the least bit awesome that you can get all your favorite old games (that you own already, obviously) on your HDTV with a wireless controller? Are you really saying that the PS3 would be better if it did less? What kind of geek are you?

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  13. Re:Sweet! by salmaklak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You've obviously never used Linux on the PS3 at all and are trolling. I've used my bluetooth keyboard on Linux with the PS3 since first installing it 2 years ago. That's on YDL, Ubuntu, and Fedora. Secondly, all the RAM has been usable for some time now so once again you are trolling.

  14. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bzzt.. Wrong...

    YellowDog 6.1 allows access to the GPU memory too...

    It's the only distro that ships with the kernel patches that allow it to do so, but there is nothing stopping any distro picking up the kernel patch.

    http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9858/

  15. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    not too much

    indeed you are right about bluetooth, but using the video mem is not of much help with the ram shortage

    why?

    because its video mem

    you can copy very fast into it, so swapping out to it works well

    -but- reading from it is painfully slow, and all in all using hdd's for swap is more convenient

    i wish we would get some more acceleration than using the cpu dma for pushing data around - that would make ps3 linux quite usable

    but in its current state it is really only for those usable, like me, who wish to train cell programming (which is not that difficult as some like to explain in the media)

  16. Re:Sweet! by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I said 'last time I checked' the bluetooth did not work, after which I haven't bothered to check on it again because it was already obvious it sucks for anything but Cell development.

    And using the ps3vram driver you do _not_ have full access to the 256 MB video RAM, you can use it, but the bandwidth is terrible because it actually uses the GPU to DMA memory back and forth to a window in (directly accessible) XDR memory, because the bandwidth of the 2nd half of memory to the CPU is about 8MB/s (or something similarly slow, you get the point). The way it's used with ps3vram this is only useful as swap space, and even then swapping to the HD is almost as fast.

    You obviously don't really know much about how PS3 linux works at all and are astroturfing.

  17. Don't get too excited by themildassassin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It strikes me that people who try to hype up the PS3's emulation under linux have never tried it.

    I have, ignoring the large amount of tweaking to get a distro working properly with the PS3 hardware/HDTV (I've tried yellow dog and ubuntu), the emulation just isn't very good.

    At least with an NES emulator you'll be able to run a game at full speed. However, good luck getting it fit to the screen properly or get it working with PS3 gamepad (again more tweaking). Other systems, SNES, GENESIS, don't have an emulator that is going to run at full speed on the PS3.

    Other software suffers from the same problems, lack of selection and slow performance. Maybe this will change in the future, but right now linux on the cell isn't that great for desktop style apps. Yet I see it hyped up all the time, but people who either haven't bothered to try it, or are fine with a lot of tweaking for a extremely sluggish emulation/desktop experience. Just because you can do it, doesn't always mean that it is worth doing.

  18. Re:Wow, Guess That Makes The 360 A Massive Failure by supernova_hq · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does that 28.9M include replacements for the dead ones? ;)

  19. Depends on the scaler by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You think that is great? Get a big screen TV and play Super Mario Bros. 3 on big world.

    Oh God, the pixels, the pixels are coming to get me!!!!

    It depends on which emulator you're using. If you're using the official Virtual Console emulator, it'll look blocky because vcNES uses nearest-neighbor resampling. But if you're using an emulator that supports Scale2x, hq2x, or some other smart resampling method for line art, you can get NES games to look better than TG16 in some cases and Super NES games to look nearly PS1-quality.

  20. Re:Sweet! by Phasma+Felis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Only" 256MB RAM? Accurate or not, what do you think we're emulating here? The SNES had a total of 256 kilobytes of RAM, with cartridge ROMs topping at 6MB. Quake 2 ran on a Pentium/90 with 16MB.

    The PS3's specs might be a problem for a Windows box that demands half a gig for OS overhead, but Linux isn't supposed to have those problems.

  21. Re:Sweet! by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are several projects, like spu-medialib and mesa3d, which accelerate PS3 graphics/video on the Cell's SPEs. spu-medialib is actually a general framework for acceleration, while mesa3d offloads OpenGL onto the SPEs as a GPU. Why don't you put some of those people you say you're training to program the Cell onto those projects and give something back to the community that's given you the programmable platform?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  22. Re:Can someone answer a few questions for me? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are several projects, like spu-medialib and mesa3d, which accelerate PS3 graphics/video on the Cell's SPEs. spu-medialib is actually a general framework for acceleration, while mesa3d offloads OpenGL onto the SPEs as a GPU.

    There's a narrative tutorial for installing the spu-medialib mplayer driver, with links to files, that plays video on the SPEs quite well, including 1080p HD videos.

    The USB works fine, so an external HD should work fine. I don't know whether there are PPC (the Cell's application core) drivers for a USB tuner card, but you should try it. If it doesn't work, make it work with some programming. That's what Linux is all about :).

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  23. Re:Sweet! by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Listen, I've tried PS3 linux before, I know what the hardware is, and I know what the limitations of PS3 linux are. These have not changed (apart from the bluetooth thing), and these are not bound to change. ie: the 2nd half of memory will always be basically useless, and the RSX will never be fully accessible from PS3 linux.

    So effectively, there is no hope PS3 linux will get more useful than it already is, which is how it was when I checked it out. I've been running it for a few months which was about a year ago, and back then it broke 3 times on firmware updates. How you would know better how much time I spent with it eludes me...

    If you don't believe what I'm saying about PS3 linux: go ahead and try it anyway, I couldn't care less, not my PS3, not my spare time. Just find out yourself how terrific it works and how much I'm trolling here. Don't see why I would be trolling about PS3 linux on Slashdot anyway but hey, some people here obviously feel better screaming troll all the time.

  24. Re:Sweet! by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually I know the guy who's working on spu-medialib, he's unsolo from ps2dev.org. I've actually been exchanging some thoughts with him back when I was playing around trying to do video decoding on the PS3. Anyway, spu-medialib is far from complete and doesn't nearly make up for the lack of GPU acceleration, there hasn't been any major improvements since back when I was playing around with PS3 linux. You can still forget even getting 720p playback on PS3 linux. Don't know about the state Mesa/Gallium/anything else to do 3D on the Cell, but judging from the activity on PS3 dev forums there's nothing interesting for end-users there either.