Slashdot Mirror


Quick Boot Linux Hopes To Win Over Windows Users

Al writes "A company called Presto hopes to exploit the painful amount of time it takes for Windows computers to start up by offering a streamlined version of Linux that boots in just seconds. Presto's distro comes with Firefox, Skype and other goodies pre-installed and the company has also created an app store so that users can install only what they really need. The software was demonstrated at this year's Demo conference in Palm Desert, CA. Interestingly, the company barely mentions the name Linux on its website. Is this a clever stealth-marketing ploy for converting Windows users to Linux?"

7 of 440 comments (clear)

  1. Boot Time is the least of the pain. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am fairly sure faster boot times wont cause most people to switch. For most people it comes down to being able to run their apps, and not the sometimes poor GNU replacements of their apps.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  2. Making Linux Work by Useful+Wheat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Although I agree that a shorter boot time would be attractive, I doubt this will increase the number of people using Linux. A lot of the resistance to using Linux is tied up in the number of applications that don't port to the operating system, not the boot time. It doesn't matter how quickly the OS is available if you can't do anything once it turns on. If you could make it so that the majority of windows applications ran without resistance, I think that almost no boot time could make Linux revolutionary. Until then, I think you're wasting man hours on the wrong problem.

  3. Re:Who reboots? by InlawBiker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even Vista boots pretty quickly, at least to the login prompt. The excruciating delay comes from loading all of the apps - virus checker, printer/scanner tools, laptop vendor "helpful tools" that don't seem to do anything, etc. It's ridiculous.

  4. Re:Easier to DIY... by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are you kidding? When is the last time you used OpenOffice.org? If the version number was earlier than 2.4.0, I might agree with you; but OOo is at 3.0.1 now and it's quite good and fully integrated as a replacement for all MS Office -- the only thing it doesn't do well are Excel macros, and that's for a reason: they're broken and easily replaced. As for database apps, with Office you have Access, which is fine for very small databases, but more than a few thousand records you need to look at SQL anyway, which if you recall is a standard array of functionality (designed on purpose), so MySQL can do the job pretty well as MS' SQL Server, and sometimes better.

    ...and drawing apps

    What MS Office drawing app are you referring to? Would that be Paint? Paint is a POS, and even MS knows that (they really ought to replace it with Paint.NET)

    I can replace all my Office apps with free alternatives:

    MS Word = OpenOffice.org Writer
    MS Excel = OpenOffice.org Calc
    MS Access = OpenOffice.org Base
    MS PowerPoint = OpenOffice.org Impress
    MS Publisher = Scribus
    MS Outlook = Evolution
    MS Paint = GIMP or OpenOffice.org Draw
    Adobe Illustrator = Inkscape
    Adobe Acrobat = (practically any Linux application can create a PDF or PS file)

    The list can go on, and others here can easily tell you more applications, I only wanted to harp in on a few that you might be interested in (or didn't even think about.) The days of MS Office being the be-all-end-all of office application suites is over and has been for a while now.

  5. Re:Who reboots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How long does it take your oven to pre-heat? Honestly this is all apples to oranges. Most people simply don't care about the fact that their computers take a bit of time before they're ready to use.

  6. Re:Hibernation? by jmcvetta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We don't have anyone willing to use a shovel anymore to do real work.

    Here, let me correct that for you:

    "We don't have anyone willing to use a shovel anymore to do real work for less than a living wage."

  7. Re:Hibernation? by djtack · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Two reasons, I think:
    • Many of my coworkers running Ubuntu (and I've occasionally seen this with XP also) can't reliably sleep and wake without crashing.
    • Badly designed hardware, with short battery life when sleeping. My older PowerBook G4 could sleep for 2 weeks on a single charge; my newer MacBook gets about 1 week on sleep. Again, I've seen a lot of wintel hardware who's battery won't survive an overnight nap.

    I'm not saying this is a problem for everyone; just that there's enough issues that I think a lot of people are afraid or unable to use sleep.