It's Not the 15th Birthday of Linux
Glyn Moody writes "There's been a spate of celebrations of Linux's 15th birthday recently. What they're really marking is the 15th anniversary of version 1.0. But do version numbers matter for free software? The 'release early, release often' approach means there's generally little difference between version 0.99.14z, say, and version 1.0. In fact, drawing attention to such anniversaries is misguided, because it gives the impression that free software is created in the same way as traditional proprietary code, working towards a predetermined end-point according to a top-down plan. So how should we be choosing and celebrating free software's past achievements?"
It's an excuse for a party! I celebrate Christmas to but I don't believe in santa.
Who? Who is but the form following the function of what and what I am is a man in a mask.
when Linus says it is. He has final approval on any birth date.
Start celebrating the years when someone says, "This will be the year that Linux will take over the desktop."
I've always thought "release early, release often" is a terrible idea.
My wife tells me the same thing.
After about the 100th anal-retentive jackass to smugly point out "2001 is the ACTUAL start of the millennium, you know!" I just started punching them.
SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
So how should we be choosing and celebrating free software's past achievements?"
Booze. Lots and lots of Booze. And strippers. Lots of strippers. And pie. Gotta have some pie.
Sent from your iPad.
I believe the most logical choice for the Linux birthday is to take whatever date is median to Linus Torvald's birthday and UNIX's birthday.
When things get complex, multiply by the complex conjugate.
We all know that Linux was made in 1979.
[yes this is a joke post]
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
I, for one, do not plan to attend the parade, now that I know it's all a misguided sham...
well, the point is to get people to test it so you can know if it's carp or not
Damn straight. I always want to know if there's anything fishy about the software I use.
http://marriedmansexlife.com/
That post is more akin to Linus announcing he was pregnant. I would regard the 1.0 release as the birth, with initial coding of the 0.x releases akin to baby showers and painting nurseries.
The conception, like most, was the result of a drunken night in front of a computer terminal, filled with unwise and hasty decisions. When Linus woke the next morning, with the most schocking hangover, he saw before him the beginnings of an x86 OS kernel, with drunken documentation and to do lists, and no memory of how any of it came to be on his hard drive. He took it from there.
I mean, no one honestly decides to write a kernel when they're sober, do they?
May the Maths Be with you!
It can be carp as long as it scales well.
Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.