Slashdot Mirror


Streaming March Madness On Linux?

neersign writes "March Madness is here and NCAA.com is streaming all of the games over the internet for free. The downside is they are using Microsoft technologies to do so. The standard player lists Windows XP/Vista, IE6, and WMP 9 as the base requirements. The High Quality Video Player requires Silverlight 2. So my question is: how would a Linux user be able to work around these requirements and watch the games?"

120 comments

  1. Faggots by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Call them a bunch of faggots for using Microsoft technology. Publicly. Declare whatever it is they're showing to be boring (wtf is march madness?) and take your dollars elsewhere--or to a campaign against them.

    1. Re:Faggots by Chabo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As unabashedly brutal as his wording was, I think he's absolutely correct. The technologically-oriented community must teach the rest of the world that things like proprietary formats, vendor lock-in, and all of the other various things we rail on about are bad.

      A high-profile example like the NCAA, which attracts many "Joe Sixpack" fans across the nation (does anyone outside the US watch basketball?), would be a perfect example of how closed formats hurt the average consumer.

      I know Mac users are about as likely as Linux users to watch basketball, but with the recent increased popularity of Macs, wouldn't that be a selling point for open formats? I can't imagine OSX has a good Silverlight implementation. I couldn't even find evidence of Moonlight being ported over.

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    2. Re:Faggots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It hasn't worked yet. How do you plan to "educate the masses" that what works so easily for them is bad?

    3. Re:Faggots by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has a native Silverlight plug-in for OS X. It's how Netflix was able to include OS X support for their streaming-video service, which is requires the kind of DRM that Silverlight offers.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    4. Re:Faggots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You don't have to be especially smart or sophisticated to buy a Mac (though it helps), so I'm sure there are plenty of Mac owners who are interested in watching this silly little sporting event.

    5. Re:Faggots by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1, Insightful

      you don't. You educate the asshole media companies by calling them assholes. If it's all 5 linux users that care, they'll ignore you; if it's 500 e-mails in one day, they might take notice.

      Or you could be like Twitter and talk about how evil Microsoft is in IRC channels and how Slashdot moderation is so unfair.

    6. Re:Faggots by codemachine · · Score: 4, Informative

      SIlverlight 2.0 is only supported on Intel Macs. So any PPC Mac owners are screwed.

      So are people with another platform without a Silverlight implementation, such as Linux, BSD, Nintendo Wii, Playstation, your phone, etc...

    7. Re:Faggots by Jamie's+Nightmare · · Score: 3, Insightful

      educate the asshole media companies by calling them assholes.

      I suppose you don't see the "pot and kettle" variety of irony in that method. But trust me, most people would see it.

      --
      "When you see a unixer brainwashed beyond saving, kick him out of the door." - Xah Lee
    8. Re:Faggots by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope, I don't. It's like walking into some dude's trailer when he's beating his wife, and beating him in the face with an empty trash can you found. Don't see the problem here.

    9. Re:Faggots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do.

    10. Re:Faggots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get Virtual Box or VMWare, get a copy of XP, install XP on Virtual Box/VMWare. Install silverlight and the plugin from the NCAA site on the XP desktop, watch and enjoy.

      PS you will need to enable Audio for that virtual machine

    11. Re:Faggots by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine OSX has a good Silverlight implementation. I couldn't even find evidence of Moonlight being ported over.

      I can't either, but that's because I don't have to. I have an Intel Mac Mini, and Silverlight/Netflix works perfectly - so well that I've replaced my cable service with Netflix and Internet TV.

      Sad that Linux isn't supported (yet) but I understand that Moonlight is making good progress...

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    12. Re:Faggots by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      You don't? Seriously? I suggest you start a train of thought somewhere around How-Would-Beating-Him-Up-Prove-Violence-Solves-Nothing station.

      See, you're trying to solve a problem with someone acting anti-socially by acting anti-socially. All you're telling them is that they're going about it the right way, but it's just their implementation that's wrong.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    13. Re:Faggots by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Which still kills the argument for Average Joe -- if he's switching to Mac, he's probably switching to a new Intel Mac, not a hand-me-down PPC. Silverlight will work fine, and the anti-DRM speech will get a "what's your point?"

      Because ultimately, if the argument is that you can't watch it on the PS3 (running Linux) on your TV, Average Joe will see that as a feature that "they" didn't add, whereas we see it as a basic right they took away.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    14. Re:Faggots by AkumaKuruma · · Score: 1

      look up the Moonlight project. its a Silverlight implementation for *nix that is being partially supported by MS.

    15. Re:Faggots by nfsilkey · · Score: 3, Informative

      I know Mac users are about as likely as Linux users to watch basketball, but with the recent increased popularity of Macs, wouldn't that be a selling point for open formats? I can't imagine OSX has a good Silverlight implementation. I couldn't even find evidence of Moonlight being ported over.

      Wrong. Im a Mac user and I watched about 5 hours of tournament coverage last night (Go Horns!) over the intartubes via http://mmod.ncaa.com/video. Silverlight 2 worked like a champ in Firefox 3.0.7 atop OS X 10.5.6. It was pretty slick, and the quality of the stream was fantastic. Blew through over a gigabyte of transfer per hour of streaming. And I watched over the air on my couch. It was great.

      Once Silverlight showed up with OS X support several months back, both initial installation and subsequent upgrades 'just freakin worked'.

      But I likely wouldnt have had such a good night if I still pimped Ubuntu on a portable ... :/

    16. Re:Faggots by HellProphet · · Score: 0, Troll
      I laughed, when it told me I needed Windows, Windows Media Player, Internet Explorer.

      I want to barrage them with emails saying "So are you saying I cannot view this running Linux, with Totem, Using Firefox?"
      O boy what gives. LOL

    17. Re:Faggots by Chabo · · Score: 1

      We should also show kidnappers a good example of socially-acceptable behavior by giving them freedom, instead of holding them in an enclosed space against their will. Holding people against their will is what a kidnapper should do, and that's bad, so let's not do that.

      Do you really think that you'll be able to talk the guy out of beating his wife? With most violent people I've encountered, the only thing that will deter them from committing more violence is physical prevention. Most people aren't trained in restraint techniques, and don't carry around handcuffs, so beating them into submission is the only available recourse.

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    18. Re:Faggots by Chabo · · Score: 1

      From your grand-grandparent:

      I couldn't even find evidence of Moonlight being ported over.

      Already been discussed.

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    19. Re:Faggots by Chabo · · Score: 1

      Im a Mac user and I watched about 5 hours of tournament coverage last night (Go Horns!)

      I'd venture a guess that you're a statistical anomoly. ;)

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    20. Re:Faggots by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      Well done, you've managed to create false dichotomies, (the only thing you can do other than jail someone is free them, the only alternative to violence is discussion) and you've discovered the joys of anecdotal evidence.

      Would you like to try again?

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    21. Re:Faggots by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      You don't? Seriously? I suggest you start a train of thought somewhere around How-Would-Beating-Him-Up-Prove-Violence-Solves-Nothing station.

      You walk down the dark alleyway.

      You are in a dark alleyway. A man is holding a knife, forcing a young girl to disrobe. He seems intent on raping her.

      Obvious actions: [D]iplomacy, [K]ick his ass

      $ Diplomacy

      He seems uninterested, both in discussing it and in having witnesses. He stabs the young woman, and hurries after you to cut your throat!

    22. Re:Faggots by Chabo · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the third option, which is sadly the one most people take:

      [W]alk away, and pretend you didn't see anything.

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    23. Re:Faggots by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      That is the most asshole thing you can possibly do. Every problem in the world is not your problem, so it's obviously not your fault for not making a possibly ultimately failed attempt to help someone. Right. I'd carry a knife just on principle because of this, but I'm not comfortable with it; my hands are a better weapon for me, somehow, so I guess I'm already always ready to stand up for what's right.

      Everyone should learn some form of self-defense. It's the only decent thing to do. Put yourself between someone helpless and someone trying to hurt them, and then defend yourself.

    24. Re:Faggots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't kill the argument.

                It's easy to point out "These computers (PowerPC Macs) are x years old, and ONLY due to using non-open, rights restricted formats, they can't play this, this and this.. if it was open it'd play. The computer you get NOW may not play closed video formats in the near future just because some vendor doesn't want to support it any more. Support open formats, and you can use the current computer indefinitely." (Even among Windows users, for instance, Win98 and Win2000 do not have players for newer closed-format files, DRM especially just no longer supports 98 or 2K; I'm sure very soon after Win7 comes out Microsoft will make sure their new DRM will require Win7. They probably WOULD already have Vista-only stuff if Vista hadn't bombed so badly.)

                I'd also point out the numerous rights restrictions schemes recently that have shut down, leaving people completely unable to use the (mainly music) they paid for (Microsoft, Major League Baseball, several others have cut off authentication servers, screwing those who paid for files that now will not play). This won't apply for streams but at least should get attention.

                Finally, I comment "Do you want to be able to move music on and off whatever video or music player you'd like? Closed formats try to prevent this, open formats do not."

    25. Re:Faggots by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't kill the argument logically, but it absolutely neuters it. If I may play devil's advocate for a moment:

      These computers (PowerPC Macs) are x years old, and ONLY due to using non-open, rights restricted formats, they can't play this, this and this

      So what? My computer is new. Shouldn't new computers be able to do more stuff?

      if it was open it'd play.

      Still not getting me to care.

      The computer you get NOW may not play closed video formats in the near future just because some vendor doesn't want to support it any more.

      Well, in the future, I'll just buy a new computer and it'll support those formats, duh! I don't expect this computer to last forever.

      And in the future, I'll want to watch the game that's new then. If I need this game, it'll be on YouTube.

      Support open formats, and you can use the current computer indefinitely.

      That sounds nice, but if by "support open formats" you mean "don't use closed ones", I'd rather watch my sports than not.

      I'd also point out the numerous rights restrictions schemes recently that have shut down, leaving people completely unable to use the (mainly music) they paid for

      That's why you go for the subscription services. If one closes down, you just switch to another, and re-download all your stuff.

      Finally, I comment "Do you want to be able to move music on and off whatever video or music player you'd like? Closed formats try to prevent this, open formats do not."

      Answer: I don't really care, that's complicated and hard to do anyway.

      Eugh. Now, speaking as myself...

      I do avoid all DRM in media, with two exceptions: Other people's systems (if I'm at someone's house, I won't insist it's a Mythbox before I use their DVR), and several video game DRM schemes (Steam actually makes a really good trade -- you have to be on the network all the time, but the network actually does benefit you, and it's not like you were going to play an open source game instead.)

      Oh, and I suppose you could count Windows itself, though I only boot it for games.

      But it's really hard to make that sale to people who haven't already been burned by DRM. Even once you do, it's even harder to convince people that this is something they should be enraged about, rather than something they should be annoyed about.

      Again: They see it as a feature that wasn't added, rather than a feature that was killed. Remember, for us, the ability to transfer large files between computers is as "easy" as scp, ftp, etc. For them -- once they understand that email can't handle it -- a brand-new service like yousendit, or copying everything to an external hard drive, is a brilliant innovation.

      The most important point to communicate, and the most difficult, is just how cool our lives get when you take away DRM. I try to demonstrate that as effectively as I can, by occasionally saying things like "Oh, that movie isn't on my laptop, but it's on the server upstairs. Ten minutes and it'll be transfered down over the wireless."

      And even then, it's still on the basis of individual features, not "freedom", that Joe understands this. Meaning that as soon as Microsoft adds enough DRM that you can do that (but only between Windows Media compliant machines), it deflates the whole argument.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  2. reverse engineer their website by spotter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    search deadspin, you'll find my site ;)

    1. Re:reverse engineer their website by spotter · · Score: 1

      and yes, I mean to be a bit obtuse about this. sorry. not hiding it, just not advertising it either.

      When my cable modem comes back up, I'm hoping to see if I can figure out how to get the HQ streams working, the streams I'm getting right now are viewable and smooth, but crappy resolution wise.

  3. Yahoo Sports by snl2587 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yahoo typically streams NCAA basketball games, and I've had success with opening the videos with Totem using GStreamer codecs (from the "bad" and "ugly" set, though).

    1. Re:Yahoo Sports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yahoo Sports links you to the same website, mmod.ncaa.com

    2. Re:Yahoo Sports by donaldm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      March Madness is here and NCAA.com is streaming all of the games over the internet for free. The downside is they are using Microsoft technologies to do so

      Has anyone asked if the games play on under MS Windows or as they are known "Games for Windows"? If this is the case then for the Linux user assuming you could download the game you would have to use a MS Windows emulator such as Wine. I think the average Linux user should ask if they are really that interested in playing these games since it is not native to Linux but even if you could download it you have to ask the question do I like sport games? Some people do some people don't.

      Basically like it or not Microsoft really commands the game market on PC's although it never ceases to amaze me that there are many millions of Linux users in the world and most likely as many as some of the consoles on the market today and yet these consoles have hundreds of games available for them. To me it seems that most PC games developers don't seem to care for the millions of Linux users which does actually translate to lost sales. If a company was brave enough to make native games for Linux they could also make a good deal of money as well. Of course they could loose as well but that is the chance you take and this equally applies to MS Windows and console games as well. If consoles are anything to go by then one to five million game sales (depends on the game) can actually make a profit and there are enough Linux users in the world to support this.

      At the moment there does not appear to be many innovative game developers, most are quite happy to bring out instalments 2, 3, 4, 5 etc of a so called franchise. You know who I am talking about. I know this type of approach makes money and in some respects I can't blame the developer since they are in the business of making money so in many respects it is the buyers fault for being happy with this. Some franchises can be well worth waiting for but many are really just an add on and an incremental add on at that still it appears many people like this.

      Finishing my console rant, my attitude to Linux gaming is if a game company can't make a native Linux game then they have just lost a possible customer. The loss of one customer is nothing and why should any company care, but millions? IMHO these companies are either drinking the Microsoft cool-aid or they are being subtlety threatened. Quickly puts back on anti Microsoft tinfoil hat :)

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    3. Re:Yahoo Sports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when will you come back to rant about either basketball, video streaming, or silverlight?

    4. Re:Yahoo Sports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that they're talking about WATCHING March Madness games, right? March Madness is the nickname for the annual NCAA men's basketball tournament. No one is talking about playing games, consoles, etc. Not sure where the hell you got that idea.

    5. Re:Yahoo Sports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol. I thought my dad was the king of missing the point, but you've claimed the crown. I salute you.

    6. Re:Yahoo Sports by tepples · · Score: 1
      Anonymous Coward wrote:

      You do realize that they're talking about WATCHING March Madness games, right?

      Unless grandparent was supposed to be an ironic comment about the difference between participatory sports and spectator sports.

  4. If you could make it work under Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then you would be watching sports which would make you not a Linux user.

    *computer explodes from the incongruity*

  5. How about Moonlight? by doas777 · · Score: 2, Funny

    it's my understanding that moonlight is supposed to fill that gap.
    http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/05/15/moonlight-release-puts-Silverlight-on-Linux_1.html

    1. Re:How about Moonlight? by CannonballHead · · Score: 1
      Almost.

      Currently support for Silverlight 2.0 is in pre-Alpha stage, but if you want to test it, or contribute to the code, you will need to: ...

    2. Re:How about Moonlight? by Protocron · · Score: 1

      Last I read, Moonlight support for those specific features aren't available until Q3 this year.
      That said, you might try the Moonlight that let everybody stream the presidents inauguration address. I doubt it will work, but it's worth a try.
      http://www.go-mono.com/moonlight/

      --
      CAPS LOCK: ITS LIKE THE CRUISE CONTROL FOR AWESOME
    3. Re:How about Moonlight? by mike_sucks · · Score: 1

      Of course, this is why Mono's support of the .NET APIs in general, and Moonlight in particular, is bad for Linux: it is encouraging services to deploy Windows-specific technologies under the guise that it's actually "cross platform".

      Mono is a nice VM and C# is a reasonable language, but they should stick to implementing Free APIs, like Qt and GTK+.

      /Mike

      --
      -- "So, what's the deal with Auntie Gerschwitz et all?"
    4. Re:How about Moonlight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, where on this March Madness website does it say they chose Silverlight because it was cross-platform?

      You are an idiot. Man web developers are going to use whatever tools they feel like, whether it is cross platform or not. That is exactly why Moonlight is so important.

  6. Re:no fags allowed! by osiris247 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    get your faggot linux the fuck off our game. you fucking homos should just die and we'd hear no more of you or your faggot linux. go suck a dick.

    For the record, the next time you enjoy your Tivo, your using linux. Hope you like the taste of cock meat.

  7. VirtualBox by Protocron · · Score: 3, Informative

    Download VirtualBox

    http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads

    Install a version of Windows XP. If you don't have one find a torrent... cough cough blackxp cough.

    Watch March Madness on Windows on Linux.

    For the record, I don't watch sports, so I don't know that it work. That said, I have watched Netflix (uses Silverlight) on a licensed Windows in Virtualbox on Ubuntu.

    --
    CAPS LOCK: ITS LIKE THE CRUISE CONTROL FOR AWESOME
    1. Re:VirtualBox by shentino · · Score: 1

      and you're sure that going through a VM-VMM boundary won't slow things down?

    2. Re:VirtualBox by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention that it would require buying Windows to run in virtualbox.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    3. Re:VirtualBox by westyvw · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I hate that idea. I really do. I don't want to support it, not even in a backdoor method. I want web standards, not another flash player, and particularly nothing from Microsoft. That said, a VM with Windows is better then installing it on a drive anyways. There is no slow down, and once the computer is set up the way you want it, take a snapshot. No need for antivirus or spyware tools.

    4. Re:VirtualBox by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      On x86, it shouldn't. They all have 2d acceleration (on hardware level) which covers the acceleration features a video player would need too.

      What matters is RAM. XP should run on at least 768/1GB RAM and Linux overhead must be calculated along with it. It should be prevented from swapping (real swapping, not tactical one). The ''Virtual GPU'' should have 16 or 32MB of RAM too.

      Another thing is, if CPU has virtual machine acceleration, it should be enabled (disabled by default).

      Sun's Virtualbox comes with _very_ conservative settings, at least on a Mactel OS/X.

      One thing bugs me is... The DRM layer. Even some software (e.g. Symantec Home) are coded in a way that they will reject to run on Virtual machines. I guess site must have a test clip so it should be tested.

    5. Re:VirtualBox by MortenMW · · Score: 1

      What is this buying you are talking about? Do you mean sponsoring TPB?

    6. Re:VirtualBox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No - Windows Beta 7 is free. The license keys are free. No vista required. It SAYS it's not standalone, just select "Custom Install" and it will start from scratch.

      Granted, Beta 7 will only work up till July before acting up, but hey - 4 months will do a lot of NCAA.

    7. Re:VirtualBox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does work. I watched the Memphis game yesterday in VirtualBox on Ubuntu 8.1 32-bit. The video and audio were great except for a few hickups in the audio every 10 minutes or so. My video was actually working better than my friends video in a regular install of XP.

  8. Gibberish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    What is this 'bas-ket ball' you speak of?

  9. That's not a bug, it's a feature by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Given the fact that this is Sports, I suspect you'll find that using a closed, proprietary technology was spec'ed as a business requirement for this. The streams are probably wrapped in some kind of DRM, which is something that (as a practical matter) you'll only get by going with a single-vendor solution.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrong. I'm watching them in totem right now.

    2. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      care to give a link to a stream or explain your setup?

    3. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is the deal...Everything is dependent on Silverlight 2.0. You can't access the "normal" or "HD" stream without it. As far as I'm aware the SVN Moonlight code still only supports up to Silverlight 1.0 specs. In other words, we are shit out of luck...

    4. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by AlexBirch · · Score: 1

      Can someone sue?
      They don't stipulate in the fine print that you need Silverlight 2.0.

    5. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... They don't stipulate that you need electricity either. What on earth would you sue over... failing to teach you what a lawsuit is?

    7. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't stipulate that you need electricity either.

      False analogy. Electricity is not proprietary and is a reasonable expectation. Silverlight is proprietary and is not a reasonable expectation.

    8. Re:That's not a bug, it's a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a perfectly good analogy, retard; sorry if the point whooshed over your head: He doesn't have a fucking clue what a lawsuit is if he thinks that having system requirements is grounds for one.

  10. Forget about their crappy online stream by lordtoran · · Score: 1

    Just watch it on TV. And tell them you are forced to do that because you cannot watch the games your non-Windows computer, your smartphone, your Playstation etc.

    --
    Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
    1. Re:Forget about their crappy online stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps she doesn't have a TV.

    2. Re:Forget about their crappy online stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, I'm watching it on my linux laptop and my palm treo :)

    3. Re:Forget about their crappy online stream by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Seems kind of silly to subscribe to cable for just one month and just one sport.

      A better suggestion is to take that $125 installation fee and $80 for the month and pay off your bar tab at the local sports bar :) The games are more fun there than hunched over a Linux laptop...

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  11. Re:no fags allowed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just posted to /., you used Linux

  12. It worked last year by steltho · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was able to watch the games online last year using the mediaplayerconnectivity plugin for firefox and vlc. I tried this year, but they block all non-IE browsers from accessing the video streams. I was able to get past this check by using the UserAgentSwitcher plugin, but now it won't let me get to the streams because I don't have windows media player.

    1. Re:It worked last year by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      I succumbed today and downloaded Silverlight 2 at work today so I could watch the games in high quality. Worked in Firefox, but I felt a little dirty.

  13. You have no idea what you're talking about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The entire point to doing this is because CBS' coverage rotates amongst all the games unless you're in the major market of one of the teams and in that case you only get that game.

    The bottom line is their coverage sucks. The solution to this is to watch online. Thus, we're back at the problem presented in the summary.

  14. digital broadcast by Molochi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Kinda off topic but in Atlanta the CBS affiliate has activated OTA digital channel 46-2 as NCAA CBS. Sadly quality is only 480i (the game on 46-1 is in 1080i) but it's there to watch. I'm wondering if NCAA CBS is a national addition to the OTA Digital lineup?

    --
    "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  15. so, vlc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...needs some sort of user player spoofer plug in?

  16. Yay for consumerism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Oh hooray, we're back to the the "my $SERVICE_PROVIDER doesn't give me what I want, when I want it, for the price I want to pay for it and in the format I desire, so breaking the law by contravening the DRM is absolutely justified" school of thought.

  17. Works great in OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does Silverlight not work in Linux? The streams run & look great in Mac OSX in both Firefox & Safari.

  18. MOD Parent up by keithpreston · · Score: 1

    Where are the mod points when I need them. Thanks Molochi, you just doubled my Tournament coverage. My 768k internet just doesn't stream well, but my 12ft antenna picks up High Quality Basketball. The second channel is in 480i, but that is mostly because if they wanted two HD feeds they would have to turn down the bitrate and that would annoying the 99% of people watching the main channel.

    1. Re:MOD Parent up by leenks · · Score: 1

      That doesn't seem to bother Sky in the UK - where sports are a fuzzy mess of mpeg artifacts. Yummy.

  19. Screw them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can put up with a bit of a delay, download the games you want to see later from the usenet (posted in HD 720p, mkv), and watch them on the system of your choice at your leisure. That's what I'm going to do. To h-e-double-hockysticks with the NCAA if they want to kowtow to Microsludge

  20. IEs4Linux is one solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd say try it at least, not bullet proof but works most of the time.

    I have to use it to access my local bank's website which doesn't work with FF :(

  21. Send them a message by AlexBirch · · Score: 1

    Please be sure you're not part of the quiet minority: http://www.cbssports.com/login?xurl=/help/askmmod&p_next_page=ask.php

  22. Anyone try Moonlight? by benwaggoner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd be curious to hear how well it works.

    Their Silverlight 2 support's in alpha now, targeting beta in May and final in September.
    http://www.mono-project.com/MoonlightRoadmap

    Less than 11 months until the Vancouver WInter Olympics in Silverlight! I'm sure they'd appreciate any help in their Hackathon:

    http://www.mono-project.com/Moonlight2Hacking

    1. Re:Anyone try Moonlight? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Their Silverlight 2 support's in alpha now, targeting beta in May and final in September

      Just in time for September Madness!

    2. Re:Anyone try Moonlight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did but the taxman didn't like it.

      Fuck Micro$oft and anything they touch.

  23. But Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm no big fan of basketball, so its no big deal to me. If they wanted to stream this to everyone on the internet, they would have done so. Either someone was being an incompetent boob when they did this, or they went out of their way to be a pain in the ass. Certainly mickeysoft would have been cheerful to cut you off (they go far far out of their way to do this at every opportunity). In a case like this, when its streaming entertainment, its only really annoying (but you won't die). When the US department of disaster services or whatever immediately after the disaster in New Orleans, keeping to mickeysofts locked-in, us-only formats meant people did die. For that, its a pity that mickeysoft and the US government were not held criminally responsible.

  24. FTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Complain to the FTC en-masse so they force Microsoft to make a version of Silverlight for Linux?

    Seems to me that Microsoft have just won the desktop war, for the next ten years, thanks to more shitty proprietary format lock-in.

  25. Ooo, Ooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know, why don't you use Windows - I hear Silverlight and other Microsoft applications tend to work pretty well with that particular OS

  26. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a copy of Windows, ya cheap-skate!

    1. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unsuccessful troll is unsuccessful.

  27. VirtualBox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get virtualbox (free) and install Windows Beta 7 (free) & Silverlight - job done.

    Cheating, I guess - but it'll work.

    FYI - Hardware acceleration only appears to work with 32-bit guest OS's at the present time.

  28. Erm, what? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 0

    For the benefit of the 90-odd percent of Internet users *not* in the US, wtf is "March Madness" and NCAA.com? The site is slashdotted, or broken, or something.

    1. Re:Erm, what? by grassy_knoll · · Score: 1

      Try the all-knowing wikipedia:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAA_Men's_Division_I_Basketball_Championship

      The NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Championship is a single elimination tournament held each spring featuring 65[1] college basketball teams in the United States. This tournament, organized by the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), was first developed by the National Association of Basketball Coaches in 1939 and was the brainchild of Kansas coach Phog Allen[2][3] The NCAA would take over the tournament the following season. Colloquially known as March Madness (as the tournament takes place mainly during the month of March) or the Big Dance (as opposed to the now smaller and less prestigious NIT), the tournament takes place over three weeks at sites across the United States, and the national semifinals (the Final Four) have become one of the nation's most prominent sporting events.

  29. Mega March Madness has all games on direct tv and by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Mega March Madness has all games on direct tv and some bars are likely to have it.

  30. Telling the situation and solution? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Well, a company named Real Networks ships a fully supported Linux player and you see the feedback they get. I don't know if they can DRM on Linux, on OS X and Symbian they can.

    He will probably accept 10s of MS patents in process, have a Mono framework but he will likely watch it with that Moonlight thingie. It is not evil right?

    MS missed a huge opportunity by not shipping official Silverlight 2 to Linux and PPC/OS X right from Microsoft.com. Some could really believe they have changed their 1990s model. If they have managed to ship a 64bit player for Linux before Adobe did, imagine the feedback they would get.

    They spend their money and power to bribe the low ethics ''sports'' admins and suits instead. It is the 1990s for you, ''Watch it with our exclusive (insert dead dotcom codec) technology!''. H264 and MPEG4 SP and even simple http streaming took over, it is only MS not admitting it. Even Real moved to AAC (plus) and some variant of h264 in rv10.

    1. Re:Telling the situation and solution? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, a company named Real Networks ships a fully supported Linux player and you see the feedback they get.

      Mostly because RealPlayer absolutely sucks, on any platform. It's cool that they ship a Linux player, but it's still not something I want.

      Kind of like how MySpace probably works well on Firefox. Great, I can use it on Linux, but I still really don't like it.

      H264 and MPEG4 SP and even simple http streaming took over, it is only MS not admitting it. Even Real moved to AAC (plus) and some variant of h264 in rv10.

      Firstly: It's actually between these and WMV.

      Second: While h.264 and aac support is generally better than the latest wmv (or vc-1) and the latest wma codecs, keep in mind that all of these are exactly as proprietary, and exactly as patent-laden.

      So, if you really want to be open, put theora and vorbis in either ogm or matroska.

      Finally: All of this is really quite irrelevant. It's not the codec, it's the encapsulation. In this case, they are likely wrapping vanilla vc-1 and wma9 (or whatever) in a wmv container, and encrypting that. While I agree that it's the 90's again, they aren't even trying to hide that they have the content, and you need to install the software to get the content. They're not even trying to sell it to the consumer as being cool or innovative -- as far as I can tell, they try to sell Silverlight to developers, and then try to sell the finished Silverlight product to users.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    2. Re:Telling the situation and solution? by spotter · · Score: 1

      wrong, they are not encrypting anything. if you can figure out how to get to the streams, they play fine in mplayer, vlc and totem-xine (albiet not totem-gstreamer, as no support for windows media audio v3).

      and yes, I have figured out how to get to the streams. someone even posted my setup to this thread already.

  31. Works on my dad's Intel Imac with Silverlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Works fine on my dad's Intel Imac with Silverlight on Safari. I imagine it would work fine with Moonlight under Ubuntu, but I am not near my machine to test it or poke around with it.

  32. Re:no fags allowed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your Linux trolling is redolent of teh fail. Stay with sports fans trying to look down on people for having active sex lives, that part's funny.

  33. Bootup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Complain, complain, complain. File bug reports people.

  34. not a sports fan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also refuse to install silverlight, because I do not want Microsoft gaining control of Internet multimedia. Flash is acceptable because it isn't developed by a rival OS manufacturer who has a history of shady tactics.

          For me, it's not about demanding free software, it's about refusing to adopt technology that is under the control of an enemy.

  35. Don't. by argent · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    You're just encouraging them.

  36. How about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turn on the TV. This is one of those annoying Linux questions. Here's another, Q: I can't get "Y" to work on Linux?, A: boot into windows or OSX. This has been another addition of basic Linux problem solving.

  37. Justin.TV by Nishi-no-wan · · Score: 1

    Try Justin.TV Sports. That's how many expats get sports from their home countries while away. It's also a great resource for getting sports (and other programming) not generally available in your own country.

    This works on Macs (Intel and Power). I thought it worked on Linux with the latest Flash plugin, but I've had one Linux user tell me that it didn't. (Then again, I don't know what version of Flash he was using.) Please give it a try and report back what happens on Linux. I'd like to know for sure myself.

  38. forgot about that little bit by nimbius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    that states "express written consent of the NCAA and the -insert major network here-" thanks to lock-ins, black-outs, exclusivity rights, and licensing agreements, and the crushing monopoly the NCAA maintains on their franchise, what led anyone to expect they would allow people to watch the game in any other format but one of the most coontrolled and restrictive? if this were PBS it might be news for nerds on some level, but this highlights a greater problem with monopolistic entertainment industries.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  39. NCAA.com is not the only site streaming the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10200699-93.html

  40. Re:no fags allowed! by HellProphet · · Score: 1

    hah probably using a router in your house that uses some form of unix.

  41. How does DRM-free 1080i in MPEG-2 sound? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you need is an antenna and a TV-tuner, and you can receive many games free over the air via local CBS affiliates. (No $h17light required) In many cities, the local CBS affiliates are running additional subchannels (rescan if you don't see 'em) to carry additional simultaneous games.

    If you have digital cable, your cable company may be providing NCAA feeds too.

  42. Use Virtualization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can install a some virtual ware (Sun's VirtualBox or VMWare), install a MS client and then stream the content. It's how I get radio at work.

  43. What is a non-free API? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Of course, this is why Mono's support of the .NET APIs in general, and Moonlight in particular, is bad for Linux: it is encouraging services to deploy Windows-specific technologies under the guise that it's actually "cross platform".

    If a publisher tests its Silverlight app on Moonlight, then how is it not cross-platform?

    but they should stick to implementing Free APIs, like Qt and GTK+.

    What makes an API itself non-free, as opposed to its implementation?

    1. Re:What is a non-free API? by mike_sucks · · Score: 1

      If a publisher tests its Silverlight app on Moonlight, then how is it not cross-platform?

      Then great! But I would suggest that the majority of publishers won't, since if they are deploying a silverlight app they are going to be Windows-based anyway and not care.

      Also, unless Mono's implementation is 100% up to date with Microsoft's, you're going to lose anyway since effectively no one is going to not use the latest and greatest version of Microsoft's technology, as soon as it is released.

      "To view this site you need Silverlight 2.0, click here for a free download from Microsoft."

      What makes an API itself non-free, as opposed to its implementation?

      I didn't talk about "non-free APIs", why are you asking about them?

      I said they should stick to providing access to APIs for Free software, rather than helping to increase Microsoft's market share and harming users of Free software in the long run by implementing Microsoft's APIs and technologies.

      /Mike

      --
      -- "So, what's the deal with Auntie Gerschwitz et all?"
    2. Re:What is a non-free API? by tepples · · Score: 1

      "To view this site you need Silverlight 2.0, click here for a free download from Microsoft."

      How many web sites are going to require Windows Internet Explorer 8 the month it comes out?

      they should stick to implementing Free APIs

      What makes an API itself non-free, as opposed to its implementation?

      I didn't talk about "non-free APIs"

      To "stick to" something implies that something has an opposite from which one should abstain. As I understood it, the opposite of "free APIs" is "non-free APIs".

      I said they should stick to providing access to APIs for Free software, rather than helping to increase Microsoft's market share and harming users of Free software in the long run by implementing Microsoft's APIs and technologies.

      GNU got started by implementing AT&T's UNIX APIs. Inventing new APIs to be deliberately incompatible with non-free software smacks of NIHism. Besides, Silverlight/Moonlight has an advantage over Gtk# in that Silverlight/Moonlight is intended to run as part of a web application, unlike Gtk#.

    3. Re:What is a non-free API? by mike_sucks · · Score: 1

      How many web sites are going to require Windows Internet Explorer 8 the month it comes out?

      None, because Microsoft is implementing an open standard, rather than someone implementing a Microsoft technology.

      To "stick to" something implies that something has an opposite from which one should abstain. As I understood it, the opposite of "free APIs" is "non-free APIs".

      Sorry, I thought I spelt it out enough the second time around. Lets try again: They should stick to providing access to APIs for Free software, where the important point is the "access to Free software" part, not the API.

      GNU got started by implementing AT&T's UNIX APIs. Inventing new APIs to be deliberately incompatible with non-free software smacks of NIHism.

      Dude, you need to check your reading comprehension skills. I said "access to Free software", I didn't say "reinvent crazy new shit to replace stuff that already exists". I even gave the explicit example of GTK+ and Qt. How is this NIH? Hint: it's not.

      So, yes, Mono's VM is great, C# is a great language, Mono's implementation of the ECMA standards is great (assuming deployers don't get sued for any submarine patent encumberance, like those GPS guys (Garmin?) recently did) and so is the fact you can write great GTK+ and Qt apps using it.

      However whenever they implement something to make it easier for people to justify the use proprietary software elsewhere, for example, Moonlight, then they are harming the Free software community in the long run.

      /Mike

      --
      -- "So, what's the deal with Auntie Gerschwitz et all?"
  44. Go away, you're not 21 by tepples · · Score: 1

    A better suggestion is to take that $125 installation fee and $80 for the month and pay off your bar tab at the local sports bar :) The games are more fun there than hunched over a Linux laptop...

    It'd be a pity to be a freshman or sophomore in college and not be able to watch your own school's team because you're too young to get into a bar. I haven't seen a lot of sports bars with family rooms.

    1. Re:Go away, you're not 21 by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I'm sure a lot has changed in the 16 years since I was a freshman, but we certainly had no problems finding places to drink, let alone to watch March Madness.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  45. Rehabilitation by Chabo · · Score: 1

    the only thing you can do other than jail someone is free them

    But isn't that a true statement? So far as I can tell, "in jail" is a binary state: you either are, or you aren't. I mean, unless you add in the possibility of death.

    As for force, most of the time it is the only alternative to discussion (I'm speaking of personal, face-to-face violence by the way; I'm ignoring disputes between nations for the purposes of this thread).

    When someone acts violently towards you, or someone in the same room as you, you have only three basic options: run away or ignore the problem, use logic and reason to talk the aggressor down, or force him to stop.

    -Running away isn't always possible.
    -Ignoring violence committed against other people is even more anti-social than committing the violence in the first place. (hence Burke's famous quote: "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing")
    -Some people aren't willing to listen to logic and reason.

    That leaves force. It's not the solution to every problem, but some problems require it. Anytime you call the police because someone's acting violent, you're asking them to stop him, using force if necessary -- lethal force if necessary -- on your behalf. The police cannot always be there though; would you really be willing to sit there, waiting for the police to arrive to stop a murder when you could do it yourself, because "violence is wrong"?

    --
    Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    1. Re:Rehabilitation by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      The police cannot always be there though; would you really be willing to sit there, waiting for the police to arrive to stop a murder when you could do it yourself, because "violence is wrong"?

      And this is exactly why hyperextensions are awesome. It's so easy to get yourself up against an opponent, where they can only awkwardly reach you with the opposite arm, and in one quick twist of your body and one smooth motion SNAP their elbow isn't supposed to go that way. They are no longer trying to stab you with a knife.

      Sorry but yeah, you come at me with a weapon, you're trying to kill me. If I break your arm, you're not dead. You should be thanking me for letting you feel blinding, excruciating pain.

    2. Re:Rehabilitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So far as I can tell, "in jail" is a binary state: you either are, or you aren't.

      Yeah, that's why you're wrong.

  46. How to watch on linux a workaround by yours truly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For anyone who wants to watch the games go here and get the firefox user agent switcher https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/59
    Then go here and get the moonlight add-on which a plugin for silverlight implementation. Then go to tools>user agent switcher> and select windows internet explorer 7 and go watch some MARCH MADNESS!!!

  47. We need to get the support behind HTML 5... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...with Ogg Vorbis and Theora to heavily compete with Adobe Flash and Microsoft Silverlight. Multi-platform and seamless compatibility is key and the likes of Adobe and Microsoft are not going to focus on that goal over other goals. HTML 5 with Ogg Vorbis and Theora would be the true open standard to streaming audio and video over the Internet versus the corporate gorillas who don't care about open standards (or the need to protect such standards).