Slashdot Mirror


Is Alcohol Killing Our Planet?

Andy_Spoo writes "Something that I've been trying to get an answer to: Is alcohol killing our planet? Alcohol is a byproduct of yeast, but another is CO2. As we all know (unless you've been asleep for years), CO2 is helping to warm our planet, sending us into destruction. So how much is the manufacture and consumption of alcohol contributing to the total world CO2 level? And don't forget that bars and pubs force beer through to their pumps using large compressed cylinders of CO2. Does anyone know?"

6 of 468 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Bloody hell! by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh, and regarding the actual article, no CO2 from the alcohol industry is on a wholly different scale from CO2 emissions from industry and transport.

    It's like wondering if you peeing in the ocean when you go for a swim is making a difference to global oceanic warming because, after all, your pee is quite warm.

    --
    I hate printers.
  2. what matters is where the carbon came from by petermgreen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Carbon from biomass is just cycling in and out of the atmosphere, no big deal.

    The problem is digging up carbon that has been buried for millions of years and releasing it (either directly into the atnosphere or into a place where it is likely to get released).

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  3. NO! by dmomo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Slow News day? Correlation is not Causation? This thread is useless without pics? Whatever it takes; NO!

    For the love of all that's sacred... the answer is NO NO NO! Please dear God.. NO! Because without Alcohol .. does a world even exist?

  4. Re:Bloody hell! by reiisi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, there _are_ parts of the planet where bread is not the staple starch source.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  5. Re:Bloody hell! by azav · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lame. I'll bet you pronounce nuclear just like Bush as new-que-lurr. Look, if you don't pay attention to at least adhering to a simple standard, you'll look like sloppy to the people who do. Mastering grammar school English composition is a commendable achievement. But if you're going to be sloppy and not pay attention to the details, you inflict your lack of standards on everyone who has to read your work. It's a case of "if you want to look like a sloppy person who does not even proofread his own work, that's fine, but please keep it away from us who don't want to see your lack of attention to detail." Remember that you're penning/typing your message not for yourself but for others to read, you should at least be respectful of the people reading and proof your own work.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  6. Re:Perfect opportunity for a Simpson's quote by compro01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or that he doesn't want Canadians to take over the world. Dunno why. The world would assuredly be a better place if we were in charge.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time