Slashdot Mirror


Data Center Raid About Unpaid Telco Fees

craig writes "CBS11 News reports that the raid on Core IP networks is in the result of an investigation into unpaid telco access fees paid by CLECs and VoIP carriers to terminate calls on their networks. They also report that this raid is linked to the March 12th raid on Crydon Technology's datacenter, which also hosted VOIP providers. Anyone in the telco business will tell you access fees to other carriers are a total mess and lots of carriers have unpaid balances out there. It gives you the feeling that the FBI is acting as a collection agency for AT&T and Verizon."

174 comments

  1. Recession by telchine · · Score: 1

    Late payments are one of the signs that a company is about to go under. Is this another victim of the recession?

    1. Re:Recession by digitalchinky · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not really, reciprocal arrangements are made by telecommunications companies a thousand times every day, to say that they are complex is perhaps a bit of an understatement. Usually they work out pretty well and everyone is happy, but sometimes someone gets an agenda, or just plain greedy and this is the end result.

    2. Re:Recession by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      It is, but they'll blame the raid, not the lack of payment.

    3. Re:Recession by IonOtter · · Score: 3, Informative

      Late payments are one of the signs that a company is about to go under.

      Not if lawyers are involved?

      I'm seeing more and more of this in non-related businesses, but what it boils down to is this:

      Customer finds a discrepancy and needs to get it worked out, so they call an audit and find a MAJOR snafu. To protect themselves, they bring in the lawyers.

      All payments stop until the issue is resolved. Usually, the money is placed into an escrow during the legal proceedings, especially if the customer has the money to pay the bill.

      Provider's lawyers work with the customer, but this takes time. Take too long, and the statute of limitations will run out.

      More time passes. Customer has the money and can pay, but lawyers say no.

      Provider sends a final notice: pay up.

      Customer sends a letter: Our lawyers aren't done, and we can't send the money yet. Look! The money is right here in this account, just WAIT A FEW MORE DAYS!

      Provider turns to their lawyer: If you wait one more day, the statute of limitations will expire and they could walk away scott free.

      Now the provider has no choice? They MUST take action to protect their interests, so they seize the assets of the customer in some fashion. Most of the time this involves filing a lien on those assets, but in some cases-like this one-they can physically collect those assets.

      --
      [End Of Line]
  2. Favors by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It gives you the feeling that the FBI is acting as a collection agency for AT&T and Verizon

    Well, AT&T and Verizon did "favors" - Patriot Act - for the FBI, perhaps this is the FBI payin' them back?

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Favors by palegray.net · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In that case, the NSA is probably on the way as well.

    2. Re:Favors by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In that case, the NSA is probably on the way as well.

      Or long gone without a trace!

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:Favors by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Maybe they were there first... they were almost certainly "listening in" on a case like this, given their broad abilities in the field.

    4. Re:Favors by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      What crap. The spin on this story is outrageous. What is described in the article as "alleged fraud" is taken by the Slashdot submitter as "ZOMG, FBI is raiding people because they didn't pay their AT&T bill".

      TFA mentions Verizon going to the FBI months ago, believing it had discovered a plan to defraud the telcos out of fees (i.e. illegal access to and use of the telephone network, hence the FBI involvement).

      Seriously, it's days like this I hate Slashdot.

    5. Re:Favors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, it's days like this I hate Slashdot.

      The feeling is mutual.

    6. Re:Favors by ndavis · · Score: 1

      What crap. The spin on this story is outrageous. What is described in the article as "alleged fraud" is taken by the Slashdot submitter as "ZOMG, FBI is raiding people because they didn't pay their AT&T bill".

      TFA mentions Verizon going to the FBI months ago, believing it had discovered a plan to defraud the telcos out of fees (i.e. illegal access to and use of the telephone network, hence the FBI involvement).

      Seriously, it's days like this I hate Slashdot.

      Wow you must really dislike Slashdot as this is typical every day. Might as well just give up and read something else!

    7. Re:Favors by The+Moof · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The first article was spun into "FBI raids datacenter, believed to be because of MPAA requests on movie piracy." The entire piracy spin was added by slashdot (or the submitter, which should've been caught at the editor). There was no mention of it *anywhere* in the facts. Turns out it was false. They really seem to be trying to rile people against the FBI in this.

    8. Re:Favors by shadowbearer · · Score: 4, Insightful

        Perhaps we should all quit contributing to the spin until the exact reasons for this raid are resolved.

        The causes still seems pretty speculative, at this point. What's not speculation is that the FBI disrupted a whole lot of businesses in pursuit of what was apparently something that didn't involve all of them - which is wrong.

        Seriously, it's days like this I hate Slashdot.

        It's times like this that make me despise media journalists who don't bother to wait until the facts come out to get a story out, because they have to get "the scoop".

        Why, yes, I just finished re-reading Varley's "Steel Beach". Why do you ask?

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    9. Re:Favors by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are stupid people everywhere, it's good that you're one of few to check sources and actually think about what you read. Keep it up, keep complaining - we need more of you.

    10. Re:Favors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NSA vets all Telecom vendor support personnel with access to core networks. Not merely in the US, but also in those markets where US companies have a presence & support local telcos.

    11. Re:Favors by arkhan_jg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh COME ON. I know the feds have a bad rap on slashdot, but now you're accusing them of being back-scratching goons on behalf of AT&T?

      "Court documents show it's all part of an alleged massive fraud scheme against AT&T and Verizon."

      It's right there in the frikkin article. Large scale fraud is indeed the purview of the FBI, no conspiracy required.

      Though now I'll get modded down for this won't I. I better come up with some ludicrous conspiracy scheme instead.

      Verizon and AT&T did what they were told by our government overlords, and were protected. These companies didn't hand over their VOIP logs to the NSA like good little citizens, and now they have to pay. No doubt those records are on their way to the NSA right now! I bet they're looking for records of terrorist activies, and will just end up poring over the comm logs of honest upstanding americans, and sticking something on them when they don't find anything. And of course none of the mainstream media are covering it, they're in on it!

      There, that should do it.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    12. Re:Favors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why the personal attacks by the FBI to the CEO of the data center?
      Source:
      http://sites.google.com/site/mnsclec/index

    13. Re:Favors by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      What do you mean "trying to rile people against the FBI"? The last thread turned into a Ron Paul convention.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    14. Re:Favors by dshadowwolf · · Score: 1

      Actually, the whole 'Piracy' thing was speculated in the original article that the original summary linked to.

      However... If you RTFA you'll find that AT&T and Verizon are claiming that the owners of the datacenters are committing the fraud. If this is about interconnect fees I can see it, but from TFA it looks like it's about some other type of fee and the two big companies went to the FBI with claims of it being a massive violation of the RICO statutes.

      If TFA is to be trusted then they are trying to claim that the datacenter owners also own the companies that are defrauding them. The owner of one of the datacenters has vehemently denied this and states that the companies at fault are clients and the bills they owe the Telco's are not his responsibility. (which sounds logical enough to be true - though logic seems to have little to do with the majority of laws)

      ----

      And this post has probably blown what Karma I had...

    15. Re:Favors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I keep seeing the same agent (Allyn Lynd) from the same Dallas office in every "cybercrime" case that the media reports on I start to get quite suspicious. Most of the recent cases have involved a telephone as the primary tool of the crime. Most of them end up involving Adam Panagia of AT&T.

      It doesn't smell right.

    16. Re:Favors by bensch128 · · Score: 1

      Here's a simpler conspiracy for you: AT&T and Verizon have very good working relationships with the FBI due to the wiretapping business. AT&T and Verizon aren't being paid for the bytes being sent over their wires. So instead of waiting for the real collection agents to try to collect and let the normal court system do the job, they tell the companies to pay up or they will send the FBI after them. The internet companies don't believe them and call their bluff. After a couple of months, AT&T and verizon go to the FBI and request a raid because of a "massive fraud scheme against" them. The FBI dutifully goes in, grabs all of their equipment (their standard modus operandi) and walks out. The customers are pissed but if they were smart, they had everything on backups in secret vaults. AT&T and Verizon have just lost a ton of paying customers and are about to be slapped with several large lawsuits. QWest, MCI, sprint and covad get a ton of new business.

  3. Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by LordLimecat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So yesterday this very story was on how the FBI was acting as the RIAA's paid hitmen. Today we get a story about how theyre collection agents for AT&T (but no comments about wiretapping? im disappointed). I look forward to tomorrows article, Im sure it will be filled with useful, non-speculative bullshit. Incidentally, isnt it sort of in the FBI's realm to investigate large-scale fraud?

    1. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by palegray.net · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Incidentally, isnt it sort of in the FBI's realm to investigate large-scale fraud?

      Yes. We won't have any idea what the truth is until someone gets a copy of the federal warrants used in the raid, or until we get information that charges are being filed.

    2. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Incidentally, isnt it sort of in the FBI's realm to investigate large-scale fraud?

      Yes. But Slashdot users have a propensity for Libertarian anarchism.

      If it's the FBI doing its job in enforcing copywrite law then they're henchmen for the recording industry Mafiaa.
      If it's the FBI doing its job in enforcing fraud then they're henchmen for the telecommunications industry.

      Remember the government should be small to non-existant. And instead of changing legislation we should just be ignoring the laws that are on the books.

      Is it reasonable that a kid downloading a song is a felony? No. But that's a legislative and judicial issue. The FBI is in the executive branch and its job is to respect and uphold the law. That means if someone is believed to be breaking the law then they're obligated to enforce it.

      What's the alternative? Police officers deciding to selectively enforce laws on a case by case basis (which unfortunately does happen). I would much prefer the executive branch was consistent in enforcement instead of cherry picking cases than them attempting to make decisions of guilt and innocence before there being a fair and open trial. Obviously there has to be some exceptions to this rule (otherwise everyone would get arrested and have a day in court every time a crime is commited) but by and large I support the FBI actually doing its job when fraud is reported.

    3. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by j0nb0y · · Score: 5, Interesting

      /. wasn't upset because the FBI was enforcing the law. Most /.ers were upset because the FBI went in on a trumped up over-broad warrant and seized an entire data center. If they legitimately need to seize voip servers, that may be acceptable. But it's not okay to take servers of everyone who happened to be unfortunate enough to be leasing servers in the same datacenter.

      There's another angle to this as well. Would the FBI ever seize telco equipment that belonged to an ILEC? No. The FBI and the courts would recognize that telephone is an essential service, and you can't just cut off someone's telephone service because their provider has been naughty. So if that's true for an ILEC, why isn't it true for a voip provider? Telephone delivered via voip is still an essential service. It's the best way to request emergency services (911). So why did the FBI cut off voip service to customers because their provider had been naughty? This is seriously unacceptable behavior.

      --
      If you had super powers, would you use them for good, or for awesome?
    4. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by LordLimecat · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Or until someone has more information than

      there are reports that it's related to video piracy, sparking unconfirmed speculation...

      oh wait, we DO have more info, from CBS news--and its exactly that--

      Court documents show it's all part of an alleged massive fraud scheme against AT&T and Verizon.

      So again, isnt this exactly the sort of thing the FBI is SUPPOSED to be investigating? And if you dont think the "court documents" are a reliable source, then why the hell are people jumping to conclusions based on a report of them? All we know for sure is that the FBI raided a location, they had a warrant, and a news organization saw court documents indicating it was within their authority and rights to do so. Or should i just shut up and let people mindlessly rant about the government for the next hundred or so replies?

      Yes. But Slashdot users have a propensity for Libertarian anarchism.

      Slashdot seems to recently have a propensity for digg-like posting--find an article with an inflamatory article that supports your viewpoint, and jump on the bandwagon with no regard for the reality of the situation.
      Seriously, has reasonable and intelligent discussion really disappeared from slashdot?

    5. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes. But Slashdot users have a propensity for Libertarian anarchism.

      Libertarians don't believe in anarchy.

      However, I think most of us would agree that instead of convincing the FBI to raid these businesses, AT&T and Verizon could have filed a lawsuit against the alleged offenders, and handled this matter through normal channels. But when you have connections, I guess you can skip a few steps.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    6. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Maybe because VOIP has NEVER BEEN A GOOD 911 OPTION.

      What happens when the power goes out?
      What happens when the internet goes out?
      What happens when...

      The list goes on and on and on and on which is why if you're really concerned about 911 you should have at least one land line phone plugged into an outlet. Why? Because the FBI doesn't need to worry about VOIP service. You should have a 911 phone available.

      If 911 was REALLY a problem then Comcast shouldn't be able to cut anyone's internet access... ever.

    7. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by Trepidity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Selective enforcement is precisely a lot of the concern. If my damage deposit is not returned by my landlord in accordance with the contract, that's illegal; if my landlord deliberately fudged documents to do so, that's fraud. But you will not find the FBI doing much on these sorts of things; it's generally up to the wronged individuals to file civil suits themselves. On the other hand, the FBI does seem to frequently enter the battle on the side of large companies alleging what amounts to contract violations, sometimes with allegations of fraud involved as well. The worry is that this further unbalances the judicial system. Large corporations are already the best equipped to pursue redress themselves, via civil suits demanding damages and/or injunctions; individuals are the worst equipped to do so, due to lack of in-house legal expertise or money to fund extensive litigation. The government intervening disproportionately often to help the side that is already best equipped to defend its interests does not help.

    8. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to work at a data center that housed several racks of equipment used by every prison in the state to track all their inmates in realtime. I can't even imagine how fun it would have been if the FBI had shut all that off.

    9. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by ArbitraryDescriptor · · Score: 1

      Is it reasonable that a kid downloading a song is a felony? No. But that's a legislative and judicial issue.

      Well it's a good thing that it isn't, and never was, a felony. I keep reading little offhand remarks like this that reinforce a completely inappropriate interpretation of copyright law; It's really beginning to concern me. The day will come when someone tries to expand existing copyright law with some outrageous provision; if the only public outcry to the measure is "I thought it already said that," we're all going to owe some some recognition the MP/RIAA for a job well done.

    10. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      What happens when the power goes out?

      If the power goes out as a result of a natural disaster, then I'm sure 911 is already aware of the situation. If the power goes out as a result of a burglar/murderer/whatever shutting it off, well, I'm sure the first thing he cuts will be the phone line anyway... so now what?

    11. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes. We won't have any idea what the truth is until someone gets a copy of the federal warrants used in the raid, or until we get information that charges are being filed.

      In other words, we don't know the real story and people are dreaming up uninformed speculation based on their personal political biases? I'm shocked.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    12. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the alternative? Police officers deciding to selectively enforce laws on a case by case basis (which unfortunately does happen).

      You dont know how often this actually happens. These days anyone in trouble for anything is the result of someone asking some to enforce the laws that are in place. We dont need more laws... we have plenty (too many in fact).

    13. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You should really join the real world already. Computer networks have moved beyond the 80s and 90s. When the power cuts out at my office, our generator kicks in and all the VOIP phones and wireless APs stay running by way of POE. Thanks to my docked laptop's battery I could be in the middle of a call remoted into a server somewhere and I wouldn't even notice anything other than the main lighting go out. And we have both a physical internet connection as well as a wireless point-to-point, so if one fails the other doesn't.

      The technology exists to make infrastructure more failure resistant and redundant. People are too lazy and/or afraid of the cost. POE could make networks and VOIP just as independent of the main power grid as POTS is.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    14. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      You aren't by any chance related to Miss Cleo, are you? :)

    15. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by perlchild · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If the FBI seizes the colo, then it's acting on the warrant and seizing EVIDENCE. If it's seizing equipment belonging to all the clients of a colo, then either the mandate didn't tell it which client had done the crime, so they have to seize them all, get the evidence, and convict the one, maybe apologize to the other, or else they're operating on a theory that they were all conspiring to either commit the crime together, or help hide it.

      I won't say we don't have a bias against the FBI doing anything but arresting "Criminals" with a narrow definition that mostly includes violent offenders. So far I find non-geeks do too. On the other hand, I find seizing a whole colo to be an awful lot of combing the desert(yay space balls reference). It leaves the impression(it can be mistaken) that it's sloppy work. It does a lot of geek-offensive collateral damage. The FBI wouldn't let allegations of frauds against all the companies in a building escape, because they can't be sure each one. The businesses in a colo are all co-tenants, why aren't they treated the same?

      Yes, us geeks have our own biases, one of them is that we believe if law enforcement can't understand something, it can't prosecute it, and needs to go back to school, not prosecuting everyone until it understands. That's our bias, and it's as irrational as everyone else's.

    16. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by lethargic8 · · Score: 1

      yea seriously, anyone who has studied the criminal justice system for more then 5 minutes knows how huge a role police discretion plays in the enforcement of laws. It is one of the huge variables in the system that people not familiar with the topic tend to ignore.

    17. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by dotgain · · Score: 1

      Right, sounds like you've got every eventuality covered there...

    18. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by twostar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe because VOIP has NEVER BEEN A GOOD 911 OPTION.

      What happens when the power goes out?

      My UPS kicks in supporting the modem, the VOIP router and the phone.

      What happens when the internet goes out?

      I assume you mean when your internet connection goes out. I've got DSL and I've had it go out once in three years and that was during a pretty nasty storm. I'm pretty sure the phone was out also though I had no way of checking. So as long as the phone system works my DSL and VOIP are probably up.

      What happens when...

      The list goes on and on and on and on which is why if you're really concerned about 911 you should have at least one land line phone plugged into an outlet. Why? Because the FBI doesn't need to worry about VOIP service. You should have a 911 phone available.

      Why should I be forced to subsidize an out of date POTS when I don't use it? Maybe we should all be forced to buy and maintain emergency radios so we can call first responders when the phone system goes out.

      If 911 was REALLY a problem then Comcast shouldn't be able to cut anyone's internet access... ever.

      Because the phone company has never disconnected anyone before either.

    19. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 3, Informative

      In the US, if I'm not mistaken, criminal charges (like fraud) are generally (or even exclusively) brought by a public prosecutor (state's attorney, DA, etc), not a private party. If it's an interstate crime, I think the jurisdiction for the investigation falls to the FBI. So FBI involvement alone doesn't really seem anomalous (although seizing the whole data center does). IANAL so feel free to correct me.

      --
      Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
      Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
    20. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Yes. But Slashdot users have a propensity for Libertarian anarchism.

        You are definitely new here.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    21. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      But you will not find the FBI doing much on these sorts of things; it's generally up to the wronged individuals to file civil suits themselves. On the other hand, the FBI does seem to frequently enter the battle on the side of large companies alleging what amounts to contract violations, sometimes with allegations of fraud involved as well.

        Politics.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    22. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "isnt it sort of in the FBI's realm to investigate large-scale fraud?"

      Yes. But the technical grounds to take so much equipment from a data center is pretty dubious. It's not the motivation that really has people up in arms, so much as the precedent that if one customer does something bad while hosted in a shared data center, EVERYONE in that data center could have all their gear confiscated and any business activities based out of that site would be cut off. That's kind of like shutting down an entire phone switching station in a major city, cutting off thousands of customers, because one of the phone lines happens to connect to a drug dealer or some other illegal business.

      If the guy running the data center is involved in the issue they are investigating, fine, dig deep, but you'd think the FBI would still understand that most of the customers in there are innocent bystanders, and therefore try to minimize the impact.

    23. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by Ghubi · · Score: 1

      Maybe tomorrow it will be a drug money laundering case and the seizure was due to asset forfeiture.

    24. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by mariushm · · Score: 1

      Most people here in Europe (well, at least in my country) have cellphones.

      There are very cheap plans and prepaid cards and the 911 equivalent (112) works (in theory, never had the need to test) even without a plan or a SIM card in the phone, it should simply scan and use the first network for the emergency call.

      At least in my country there are still problems with the 112 operators collaborating with the cellphone companies to determine very fast the location (the first is too lazy/slow to implement it and the second is too bureaucratic).

      But anyways, if you're that sick or hurt to not be able to say where you are, you'll probably die in the 5-10 minutes it takes for police/firemen/ambulance to arrive :)

      But back to the subject... I agree with what you say, I makes me angry to see the FBI just gathering all servers without thinking what businesses are affected by it.

    25. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by mellon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, plenty of Libertarians are into anarchy. Of course, anarchy can mean a lot of things, from bomb-throwing radicals who just want to destroy the rule of law to people who believe that ultimately what allows societies to work is that most people behave ethically, and that consequently there is no need for some single institution to have a monopoly on the rule of law. A lot of libertarians subscribe to this latter kind of anarchism. I'm sympathetic, personally, but don't think it's practical.

    26. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by mellon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't buy this argument. The problem here is not that the FBI got involved with a fraud investigation - it makes sense that the FBI would get involved in a fraud investigation where the disputed amount is in the millions of dollars, and the crime was committed across state lines, but would not get involved with a case where the amount of the fraud was small and the fraud was committed within the confines of a single city.

      What is wrong about this case is that the FBI didn't recognize the colo provider as a common carrier and thus did not discriminate between the colo provider's customers. There's nothing wrong with the FBI investigating a crime, but there is something wrong with them doing it incompetently.

    27. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Maybe because VOIP has NEVER BEEN A GOOD 911 OPTION.

      True. Of course, I have a cell phone and a 9mm. The cell phone is good for weather related emergencies, adn the 9mm is good for hostile humans. I live in a decent area, so I only really need to worry about bad weather.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    28. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope, you'll still feel all smug about your office's very own power supply, when you need to call 911 from your home

    29. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1
      twostar writes:

      If 911 was REALLY a problem then Comcast shouldn't be able to cut anyone's internet access... ever.

      http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/fcc01j1.txt writes:

      We also invite comment on whether any advanced or high-speed services should be included within the list of core services. Commenters should address the questions set forth above, and should specify the standard or level of service to which the comments apply.

      In addition, we invite comment on whether "soft dial tone" or "warm line" services should be included within the list of core services. These services enable an otherwise disconnected line to be used to contact emergency services (911) and the local exchange carrier's central business office. In particular, we invite comment on the extent to which these services are essential to public health or safety, and how such connections to eligible telecommunications carriers may be provided consistent with the principles of competitive neutrality.

      Raise your hand if you have ever bothered to respond to an FCC request for public comments. I admit I have not.

    30. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by Trekologer · · Score: 1

      What happens when a car crashes into the utility pole or pedestal or a gardener digs up buried cable, or any number of other things happens?

      POTS isn't some magic that never has faults or vulnerabilities of its own.

    31. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by rackserverdeals · · Score: 1

      isnt it sort of in the FBI's realm to investigate large-scale fraud?

      Even if it's their job to investigate fraud, what they did in both these cases seems unreasonable.

      It would be like the FBI shutting down a shopping mall and confiscating all the inventory because one store was selling stolen goods.

      One of the reasons small sites colocate or go with dedicated servers is so the stupid actions of others on a shared hosting account won't bring their site down.

      --
      Dual Opteron < $600
    32. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by Yez70 · · Score: 1

      Cell phones work the same way here in the US too. They switch over to 'Emergency Service Only' status on the screen and only 911 works.

    33. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So if that's true for an ILEC, why isn't it true for a voip provider? Telephone delivered via voip is still an essential service. It's the best way to request emergency services (911).

      As someone who has been employed in the telephony industry, I'd like to point out that all the VoIP 'carriers' have gone to great lengths to be not considered an ILEC, or any kind of 'phone company' in the eyes of the law. It's the rules that govern the operation of an 'essential service' that has kept the traditional telephone systems limited in some of their features. It's also limited the Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (ILECs) to certain types of phone switch technology etc. VoIP providers were very happy to ignore the features that are hard (911 access) and run with the features that are easy, if you're ignoring all the regulations. They deserve this treatment, especially since they go out of their way to advertise how 911 does not work. In fact, some VoIP carriers recommend you keep an analog phone plugged in to the ILEC's wall jack, leveraging the fact that the ILEC is required to keep 911 dial tone running at a residence even after you stop paying. So, no, I don't accept the 'essential service' excuse from these jokers.

      And the FBI really should have some people on staff that understand what kind of server goes where.

    34. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for totally missing the point.

      POE works for 300 feet of cable. Look up any of the 10^n-Base-T specifications. Go ahead, I'll wait.

      POTS is a pejorative.

      Analog and digital telephone networks have self-powered wire loop distances in the 15,000 to 20,000 foot distance - 3 to 5 miles. There are some central office switches with load coils that can reach further than that.

      POE VoIP is fine in the office, but that does not make it an 'independent' service. There's just no economically justifiable way to get such short cable distances to be generator and battery backed in a carrier infrastructure model.

    35. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by JerryLove · · Score: 1

      Yes. But Slashdot users have a propensity for Libertarian anarchism.

      If it's the FBI doing its job in enforcing copywrite law then they're henchmen for the recording industry Mafiaa.

      Firstly: it's "copyright".

      Secondly: it's a civil matter (http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html), and so not in the general perview of law enforcement.

      If it's the FBI doing its job in enforcing fraud then they're henchmen for the telecommunications industry.

      We won't know until we see the warrant, but that part of "not paying the phone bill" involves criminal law or law enforcement? That would be another civil matter which should go straight to court.

      This also seems to a failure to elucidate. It is the FBI's job to investigate (some types of) fraud. You've not established that this is fraud.

      The FBI is in the executive branch and its job is to respect and uphold the law.

      Not a very typical attitude of the executive branch. Start with "the trail of tears" and move forward to Bush's many statements that he would not enforce laws he didn't like.

    36. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Hello, didin't seize an entire data center! Get some fucking facts. Core IP was made up of SOME racks on one floor of a multi floor data center that housed MANY more machines.

      You have bought into the marketing speak of a guy who bullshits people into thinking his company owns a data center. Renting a few cages in a data center does not mean you own a data center. Taking the machines in the racks of that one customer is not taking all the machines in a data center. They took all of Core IP's machine and Core IP, since they would never commit any sort of fraud, just keeps on trying to convience people too lazy to investigate a little more that an entire data center was raided.

      This guy had some servers and the FBI targeted him, they don't know which customers he had that were in on it, which were dummy 'customers' or anything else. Any computer security expert with half a brain knows the best thing to do is to power off the machines, pull the drives out, image them before doing anything else, then see what you can get from that.

      VoIP is hardly an essential service. It is not considered anything near real telephone service. If VoIP service was required to follow the same regulations for reliability as POTS, it would cease to exist overnight. 911 over VoIP is also considered a joke as it appears that VoIP providers can't pull their head out of their ass long enough to actually provide real information about the caller back to the call centers as required, and the call quality is generally far shittier than POTS. Just because you can't hear it when you're calling out from VoIP doesn't mean no one else can. At this point its pretty easy for me to tell when someone is using VoIP unless they have a practically flawless connection to thier provider. I have 3 VoIP (4 if you count my office which I'll ignore for now) service accounts right now, from 3 different companies, who all buy VoIP service from different companies, 2 of these accounts actually buy from the same upstream VoIP provider, who doesn't have their own service either! Its like one giant pyramid scheme that people are still buying into as if its the holy grail.

      Simply put, no one with a clue considers VoIP to be anywhere near the same level of service as POTS, it is a toy in its present state, it can't help but be a toy. You can't expect VoIP to perform at the same level as POTS when none of the IP networks that carry VoIP to end users are bound by the same rules as telecos.

      Do you know what a real T1 costs a fortune? Its a goverment regulated circuit. If you sell someone a real T1, not a T1's worth of bandwidth over something else, we're talking the real deal 24 channel T1, there are goverment requirements for its reliability and repair times. You pay for a T1 to your business, the provider is under law to provide a certain level of performance that FAR out weights anything any ISP in america has done on its best year.

      Because these services are not regulated as much by the goverment and have much more freedom to get by with bullshit, they also have a lot less sympathy from the goverment when they get caught doing shit wrong.

      So the goverment should leave the company running and breaking the law because the customers are going to be effected. So we leave them running hurting one group of people so they can provide service to another group. So let them keep selling stolen goods ... because the customers of the goods don't know its stolen? So since every crime you stop in some way effects customers of some sort, we should never stop any crime cause it would really inconviences someone. What about those the crime is hurting? They keep hurting because someone else made a promise they can't keep? It doesn't work that way in reality.

      The FBI didn't hurt Core IP customers and cause them to be without service, Core IP did that by either letting its customers commit enough fraud that the FBI came after them or in what I feel is the more likely case committing the fraud themselves and via dummy companies. The FBI doesn't bother with little guys you know, there are plenty of crooks to keep them busy.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    37. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      So when the tornado comes through your roof comes off, your cable modem is rain soaked and no longer working and your wife is bleeding to death next to you ...

      Are you going to be the guy that says 'sorry honey, our VoIP provider is being DoSed because they pissed off some script kiddy and they can't handle the traffic right now, I'm going to run to the neighbors wrecked house and see if they have anything' or are you going to be the guy who picks up the phone laying on the floor which is powered from the network, will likely work soaking wet assuming its a simple phone and using a network administered by people who have been doing it for years and which don't run around trying to limit your bandwidth because they've over saturated their own network.

      Maybe you'll tell her that you're sure they know there was a tornado, and of course they know they need to come to your house because your wife has serious injuries and needs priority treatment without you ever giving them a call. EMT's are awesome at their jobs, they can smell the wounded, thats why no one ever dies when tornadoes come through.

      As far as the burglar/murderer/whatever shutting it off ... obviously you aren't a criminal, or at least not a very good one, nor do you actually have an alarm system in your home. Most alarm systems have a wireless backup link, usually cellular but it depends on the provider and the area your in, so they still get the call from your house very shortly after the power goes out of the phone line looses dial tone. The systems will also run from internal battery for long enough to get the word out. Does your cable modem come that way from the provider? How about your Vonage phone? Or whatever VoIP provider you are using? Time Warner just recently started adding internal battery backup to their devices since they can't be network powered like a normal phone. They did this trying to avoid having the goverment start requiring them to be as responsible as REAL telephone companies.

      There is a reason VoIP is cheap, you get what you pay for in this case.

      In 20 years I'm sure it will be different, but today, if I'm in a disaster I'd MUCH rather have a nice dependable POTS line than a bunch of hacked together VoIP crap.

      Second, alarm systems don't call 911, they call monitoring centers.

      Finally, good luck finding a alarm monitoring company who will sell you service if you use VoIP service. Its not reliable enough for them to even bother installing the system. 2 local providers when asked about it for my home refused to use my VoIP services, neither the one provided by time warner nor my own asterisk setup to a couple VoIP resellers I use for testing.

      My point in responding to you? POTS is an extremely reliable and well working system. The hack that is VoIP currently is a complex, unreliable conglomeration of crap being marketed to people as a cheap alternative to a real phone. Its cheap because its not nearly as good as the real deal, people are buying it because its new and they don't know any better.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    38. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Except the POTS network was made resilient 30 years ago by government regulation requiring it to be a reliable service with a specific service level. Phone companies get fined for not providing a high enough level of service.

      IP networks are not at this level. Your office my use POE, pretty much everyone else doesn't. I don't know of any home anywhere that uses POE.

      Yes we can make VoIP more reliable, Its also theoretically possible to achieve faster than light travel using the Alcubierre drive, but I'm not betting on it happening in my life time.

      VoIP will never be AS reliable, you have ALL of the variables associated with POTS, and a shitload more because you're adding several more layers of packet switched virtual networking on top of the existing technology.

      And finally, its simple NOT considered the same level of service by anyone except uneducated consumers such as yourself. Even VoIP providers know they aren't there yet, they just have to keep you thinking they are great and you'll keep paying.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    39. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by sjames · · Score: 1

      Because the phone company has never disconnected anyone before either.

      Actually, cell phones without sim card and "disconnected" land lines can still be used to call 911.

    40. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by Earthquake+Retrofit · · Score: 1

      ...What's the alternative? Police officers deciding to selectively enforce laws on a case by case basis (which unfortunately does happen). I would much prefer the executive branch was consistent in enforcement instead of cherry picking cases than them attempting to make decisions of guilt and innocence before there being a fair and open trial. Obviously there has to be some exceptions to this rule (otherwise everyone would get arrested and have a day in court every time a crime is commited) but by and large I support the FBI actually doing its job when fraud is reported.

      I remember when registering for the draft was re-instituted in the Carter administration. Some stupid kid make a big stink and was made an example of. Today, the government is even more broke so 'show trials' will be even more common. That's how they select who to enforce on.

      --
      Fifty years of Yippie! 1968-2018
    41. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were no warrants, asccording to Core IP's CEO. Bummer.

    42. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If it's the FBI doing its job in enforcing fraud then they're henchmen for the telecommunications industry.

      What's the fraud? Even if what they are talking about here is true, is it fraud? No one lied, they just failed to pay fees in violation of law. Not fraud, but still illegal to fail to pay termination fees as required by law, if that is even it.

    43. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Libertarians don't believe in anarchy.

      You can have a Libertarian Utopia with no government. No other political setup can operate with a complete lack of government (well, socialism works best without a government, like in many tribes, co-ops, and communes, but the definition is essentially where all members are equal and all part of the government, where everyone voluntarily does what's best for everyone, rather than themselves).

      But, because it would work without a government, and many want "limited" government with no real minimum, it appears like anarchy. There are even "rights" which Libertarians claim they believe in that wouldn't exist. The Right to Travel can't exist with no public right of way. How can I have the right to travel if everyone else on the planet can refuse to let me pass their land to get to where I want to go? When a Libertarian can answer that, I'll think them more than pro-anarchy kooks.

    44. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by Maxmin · · Score: 1

      The one and only time my old POTS line winked out was around 4:30 PM on 9/11/2001, and that's because I lived below 14th St. in Manhattan. It took that long for the fires in and around the WTC to partially shut down lower Manhattan phone service. (I still have photos of the temporary repair facilities set up by NYNEX/Verizon on the west side, and the rather huge fiber cables they pulled up to splice, in the weeks afterward.)

      The several VOIP setups I used, over the years, have let me down countless times. Even my cell providers have been more reliable.

      Don't even get me started on Skype.

      --
      O lord, bless this thy holy hand grenade, that with it thou mayest blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy.
    45. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstood his meaning/intention. He wasn't poopoo-ing the importance of a reliable telephone in every home.

      He was merely replying to another guy ... by nitpicking and giving lame questions, thinking that his 'challenge' will push him 2 rungs up the ladder of intelligence.

    46. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Are you going to be the guy that says 'sorry honey

      No, I'm going to be the guy using his fucking mobile phone.

      Many people here moving into a new house don't get a fixed line phone. Between mobile and Skype (for international calls) they have all their telephony needs met.

      Which backwards country are you living in?

    47. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by mpe · · Score: 1

      Selective enforcement is precisely a lot of the concern. If my damage deposit is not returned by my landlord in accordance with the contract, that's illegal; if my landlord deliberately fudged documents to do so, that's fraud. But you will not find the FBI doing much on these sorts of things; it's generally up to the wronged individuals to file civil suits themselves.

      If you went to the local police they might well tell you that it was a "civil matter". They probably wouldn't be interested in the case even if said landlord was not doing anything to make being found difficult.

    48. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      While I'm not the sort to look to regulation as the answer, you've basically said that the POTS is reliable because it was made illegal for it not to be. Everybody seems to be forgetting that when phones came into existence a century ago that system was not reliable either. However people didn't throw up their hands and stick with the telegraph.

      These systems that work for corporate offices can be scaled down into new residential construction. The primary reasons that it's infrequently done today are a) it's somewhat more expensive and b) while some overlap exists, the vendors who do residential construction are frequently wholly different in skillset and method from those who do large-scale commercial construction.

      You're comparing a real, practical and deployed technology to FTL travel theory. Really? It's like you're trying to win a 'worst possible analogy' competition.

      'VOIP will never be as reliable' is the sort of absolute phrase a luddite would use. Why dagnabit, those first generation diesel engines will never develop to be as reliable as these 10th generation steam engines! The sort of sentiment which reprised itself I'm sure in the minds of luddites when diesel-electric was replaced by nuclear on submarines. And let's not forget that steam too was first thought of as ludicrous, as Napoleon Bonaparte once said: "What, sir, would you make a ship sail against the wind and currents by lighting a bonfire under her deck; I pray you excuse me. I have no time to listen to such nonsense."

      You call me an uneducated consumer. I support a successfully deployed VOIP system as part of my job function. Out of the last year, I believe there hasn't been more than an hour of system-wide downtime. Not perfect, but far from impractical.

      Like any other technology, development will solve problems. I can't understand the mindset of people who think that some technology is so special that it will never be replaced and that no newer technology 'will ever' be developed and refined enough to be useful. It's like looking back at the history of human progress, sticking your fingers in your ears and going LALALALA.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    49. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      If there were no warrants why did he unlock the doors? If the FBI or anyone else showed up where I worked and asked me open up the data center for them I would ask to see a warrant before handing over my RFID badge and if they came without a warrant I would direct them to the office of our corporate council.

      This is not because I have done, or think anyone else in my org has done anything wrong; quite the opposite in fact Its just common sense. You don't expose yourself to law enforcement without a reason for doing so. Its that same reason you NEVER let a police officer enter your home without a warrant. You might not think you have anything illegal or anything that might be probably cause to suspect a crime but It would suck to wrong. If you let them come in then they can act on and use anything they see; better to have a polite conversation on the front porch, give them their $10 donation to the fraternal brotherhood and send them on their way.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    50. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      This makes me wonder if there is more risk in hosting providers now that virtualization has taken off then then existed years ago?

      It used to be that you leased a physical box. It was your box and you would hope that if some sorta raid or something happen they would not need to disturb your equipment. It would unfortunate today if your e-commerce site got snatched up because it happened to be on the same SAN as some evil doers VM.

      I know that DDupe is the way of the world now too in that market but its likely that most of that is happening at the SAN level (most of the products I have worked with do) and the replica is going to end up seized as well because it will also have the accused stuff on it.

      That means you need multi-national sites, which might not be economical for smaller shops.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    51. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Come one there is a difference between a contract dispute and a fraud charge. If you thought your land lord altered documents after they were signed or materially stated something was working when you took passion and it was not and then tried to bill you; those things would be examples of fraud. You should go down the local police in those cases and file a complaint. I am sure the local prosecutor will be interested! Unless your landlord is his brother or something and then well your are screwed. This is why its almost always an elected position though so that corrupt prosecutors don't keep their jobs.

      Now if you think "responsible for keeping drains clear" means everything from the far end of the trap up, and your landlord thinks it means all the way out to the street, and wants to charge you for digging up the lawn to make a repair; that is contract dispute. Those are the types of matters for civil courts, and either per say representation or private attorneys.

      If you are the victim of a crime you really do have options most places. If you file a complaint someone will listen if there is merit, most of the time. These people want to get re-elected. They don't want you crying to the local paper how they failed to help you.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    52. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      The only thing I can think of is there is a "BIG" trust factor in the telecom world. I might have contracts that say I am supposed to route so much traffic on to your network, or must route traffic from networks X,Y, to you but am free to do as I wish with Z. There have been cases where call admission has been "messed" with to betterment of some convulsive parties. I can imagine something like this happening pretty easily.

      Sure AT&T you get to be the long distance carrier for my customers if you can give me a rate of 1.7c/min. They say ok. Now I am in the same "colo" in this case as some other VOIP entity. I should route all of net calls to AT but I collude with the other guy to cross connect our networks. We can route the would be off net calls across to each other when we are the end destinations. This lets us keep or exclusive contract with At&T who should be getting our business. While we still charge our customers the 2.5c/min offnet fee and just pocket the entire thing rather then buying time for At while we quietly move the data over our secret cross connect.

      Now we must carry this calls on our books so we can charge our customers but have to get creative be cause we are not getting At&T into the loop so to speak. This means we don't pay the taxes for call admission either. Which eventually shows up when one of the conspirators gets audited; or maybe AT&T notices gosh its strange our datawhare house says we consistently ran X calls a month between POP X and POP Y now we see almost none but calls going every place else for those points, they must be screwing us? This is where the FBI comes in and where it may really be fraud.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    53. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 1

      Real geeks check sources.

      They at least read the source article, in which case it's clear that the feebs didn't seize an entire colo. They seized the machines of one customer of a colo.

      A real geek might also have googled the company name, and noticed oddities - like zero web presence - no domain of their own. That just seemed weird to me.

    54. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 1

      I doubt that there are more than a hatful of "legitimate customers" - maybe not any.

      So far, the only outcry I've heard is for a huckster of "motivational speakers."

    55. Re:Looking forward to more inflammatory articles by jaydonnell · · Score: 1

      libertarianism and anarchism are essentially the same thing from different angles. For example, Noam Chomsky described anarchism as the philosophy that any coercive power held over people must have benefits that overwhelmingly outweigh the loss of freedom.

  4. Hm by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

    It seems like there's a better way to handle unpaid bills than by punishing the innocent customers. Even if this were outright fraud as accused, there should be a way to migrate customers first, especially 911 services.

    1. Re:Hm by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      there should be a way to migrate customers first, especially 911 services.

      Personally, I think they shouldn't pull the servers until they've at least seeded 110%.

    2. Re:Hm by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 1

      No real obligation to do so.

      If the company you do business with is a crook, and get's their plug pulled, you suffer as well.

      Sorta like being unknowingly in possession of stolen property.

      Upon discovery, you lose it immediately, not when it's convenient.

      Do business with a company with a good reputation instead of chasing every nickel os "savings" and you're a lot less likely to get burned.

  5. Civil vs criminal law by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "It gives you the feeling that the FBI is acting as a collection agency for AT&T and Verizon."

    Wouldn't that be a civil matter rather than criminal? I call unlikely.

     

    --
    Deleted
  6. Now that we don't have a website... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 5, Informative

    During the raid, CMG's owner, Joe Condit, says his website and business went down. "It's crippled us completely. Now that we don't have a website, we have no business, and a lot of speakers are without representation."
     
    Without saying that this raid should have occurred in the way that it did, what's stopping this guy from setting up a webserver elsewhere and getting his business back online?
     
    In an emergency, I'm pretty sure I could have a basic but "adequate" webserver for most small businesses up and running on just about any Internet connection within about 6 hours, even if I had to buy a new computer to install it on and find another Internet connection. Point the DNS records to the new address and he's back in business.
     
    He would be in exactly the same situation if the colo building burned down. Why risk your business that way? If it's important to you, back it up and have some idea of what you're going to do if it goes down.

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    1. Re:Now that we don't have a website... by kkrajewski · · Score: 4, Funny

      Back up data? Hmm. Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    2. Re:Now that we don't have a website... by ximenes · · Score: 4, Informative

      A lot of places are not prepared for a complete site loss. They may be very redundant within the site, with multiple hosts and backups and redundant power / AC / networking, but not have a single piece of equipment not located at that colocation center.

      Consider that even if they did have off-site backups (which are really the bare minimum, although a lot of small operations overlook it anyway), they probably don't physically possess any equipment to run it on or have an agreement with another colocation center to put that equipment in.

      So right now they need to put an order in with Dell and Cisco and whoever to get duplicate equipment (that they probably don't have a budget for), find another colo on short notice, wait for the equipment to arrive (1-2 weeks), do the physical installation work, and then restore all of their systems types from backups that may or may not represent the complete bare metal system image.

      Most disaster recovery plans only account for disasters within a finite period of time (the power goes out for a few hours) or for partial losses (you lose 2 of 4 web servers), because redundancy is the most expensive part of any computer deployment.

    3. Re:Now that we don't have a website... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 4, Informative

      Consider that even if they did have off-site backups (which are really the bare minimum, although a lot of small operations overlook it anyway), they probably don't physically possess any equipment to run it on or have an agreement with another colocation center to put that equipment in.
       
      This sounds like a very small business that probably doesn't require Cisco gear and all the trimmings. A cable modem with a static IP and a computer purchased at Staples to run Centos, Apache and sendmail would carry the load for at least a short time. The owner could run it in his living room.
       
      Even if it's slow, it's better than being out-of-business.
       
      Once he's online again in any fashion at all, he has bought himself the time to find a "real solution", if he even requires one.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    4. Re:Now that we don't have a website... by ximenes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I'm not sure what this particular site requires. I do know from prior professional experience that the 'second site' was always a very tough sell (and actually, of the places I've worked, only Yahoo was good about that sort of thing).

      It's more than just the hardware too, it's the processes in place to ensure that there are very seriously no dependencies on one site. For instance, maybe you deploy everything simultaneously to both sites, you buy equal hardware in both places, you do BCP failover tests regularly to ensure the second site works as expected, and so forth.

      But where do you build new packages? Where is your source control repository? Not being able to use your normal workflow can be almost as bad as a public outage, and can lead to one as well.

      In this case, maybe the guy could just slap something together, but even so the amount of effort to do what you're talking about would probably take a few days to iron out. You lose a lot of time right off the bat just figuring out what happened and whether or not you are going to be seeing your equipment again anytime soon. Plus some things are just out of your control; getting a DSL or cable hookup with a static IP, if you didn't already have one, can literally take weeks.

    5. Re:Now that we don't have a website... by mlts · · Score: 1

      This makes for an interesting business opportunity. A service similar to Mozy Pro except with better provisions for encrypting data [1] before it gets sent to the cloud. Then, should a business lose its colocated servers, they can be rebuilt from another location.

      [1]: Data encryption is solid, but what is needed is a good enterprise-level key management system so if one employee leaves or goes rogue, the data can still be recovered with another key, and the rogue key removed

    6. Re:Now that we don't have a website... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without saying that this raid should have occurred in the way that it did, what's stopping this guy from setting up a webserver elsewhere and getting his business back online?

      Yes, that's easy to say to someone complaining about their website being offline.

      What about the numerous companies that rely on coreip for origination on their DIDs? Those numbers are offline now and it will take weeks to port them (assuming they're even portable by then..)

    7. Re:Now that we don't have a website... by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Insightful

        Yeah, sure. All these businesses that were being hosted there can just go and set up this themselves, or find someone on extremely short notice to do it for a price they can afford - on their local cable providers network (nevermind that the business owners cable provider probably doesn't allow servers, WHICH IS LIKELY WHY THEY HAD A OUTSIDE PROVIDER IN THE FIRST PLACE)

      Right.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    8. Re:Now that we don't have a website... by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't you still have to wait for DNS caches to clear?

      Setting up the failover web site is the easy part. If you aren't planning for this in advance, though, your public internet services are still down.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    9. Re:Now that we don't have a website... by Maxmin · · Score: 1

      That's a nice thought, but for the under-prepared business owner, they're just as likely to be shit-outta-luck. Especially if they don't possess the technical chops to piece it all back together. They'll have to go find the freelance programmer / sysadmin who set up all their customized shiznitz, to get it up-and-running again -- even with a backup.

      The desktop machine-based website is good enough for a "Sorry, we're closed online until further notice" site. Especially if their website relied on any amount of costly-to-reproduce custom programming.

      I've lost track of the number of times I've been rung up by old friends whose website suddenly disappeared when their colo|rental machine's hard drive crashed. (Sorry, buds, no backup, no restore.)

      --
      O lord, bless this thy holy hand grenade, that with it thou mayest blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy mercy.
    10. Re:Now that we don't have a website... by mhollis · · Score: 1

      I am trying to get a webhost (AT&T, incidentally) to give me permission to move a client's domain name onto one of my servers. AT&T is saying that they have to push the domain to my server.

      I contacted my technical people and they confirm that.

      Without explicit cooperation from both sides, CMG is SOL because his web hosting provider cannot push diddly in a "blackout" situation where the FBI agents have removed power pending the conclusion of their investigation.

      My article on this issue is here.

      --
      Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
    11. Re:Now that we don't have a website... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      I am trying to get a webhost (AT&T, incidentally) to give me permission to move a client's domain name onto one of my servers. AT&T is saying that they have to push the domain to my server.
       
      If you own a domain name, you can (or at least, should be able to) point the DNS record to any IP address that you choose to enter. So, set up a webserver (mailserver,what-have-you), point the DNS record to the IP address of said server. Done.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  7. Does this mean... by basementman · · Score: 1

    So does this mean we can't blame the RIAA/MPAA for this? Damn...

    1. Re:Does this mean... by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Even better! We can blame the telecos for this one! I can't remember the last time I got to use my sardonic AT&T-Death Star Logo!

      --
      Demented But Determined.
  8. errr by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm still not sure the force exerted was necessary. Something else has to be going on here.

    First the Wolverine story from yesterday, now this? I find it hard to believe that this is really over some unpaid bills.

    --
    The game.
    1. Re:errr by Ghubi · · Score: 1

      I'm 100% sure the force exerted was NOT necessary. That leaves us with the question, was it malice or incompetence?

    2. Re:errr by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Also you don't send the swat team to the house of a company's CEO because one of their customers didn't pay their bills on time.

      This sounds fishier than the Wolverine story....

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  9. So to punish the colo by Bandman · · Score: 1

    they take down every client colocated there?

    Talk about punishing the innocent.

  10. Someone mod parent up, please by Bieeanda · · Score: 1

    ...because Jesus, this is the only level-headed post in the batch. Even the bloody tagline reads 'what they want you to believe'.

  11. Total Mess? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for link to the 5 year old article explaining complex bills are hard to figure.

    "Hey, this is confusing, we don't need to hire the staff to figure it out, just stop payments."

  12. Government agencies as the long arm of capitalism by BlackSabbath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > It gives you the feeling that the FBI is acting as a collection agency for AT&T and Verizon.

    "I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents."
    - Maj.Gen.Smedley Butler, 1935, awarded 2xCMOH

    Discuss the use of Federal agencies in protecting commercial intersts of large corporations. 2000-3000 words. Citations in Harvard style.

  13. a hit against small biz by AT&T and Verizon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As for Joe Condit, he's hoping his company can survive. "We're all for catching the bad guys and the criminals. It also has to be recognized that young, small businesses can't take a hit like this, especially in this time."

    Only a fool would think AT&T and Verizon aren't counting on exactly that.

  14. Still unreasonable seizure - cause irrelevant by Torodung · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Doesn't matter what the motive or rationalization is: Unreasonable seizure by the federal government is forbidden in the Constitution.

    There's no way they needed all this "evidence" for some unpaid bills. Nice story, but I call bullshit.

    God knows what is really going on here, but I hope it eventually sees the light of day. This is reminding me of Waco, with 98% less people being burned alive involved.

    --
    Toro

    1. Re:Still unreasonable seizure - cause irrelevant by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Thats a pretty good analogy actually.

      I really don't buy that these guys are innocent, but, just like Waco, if the FBI would listen to some more experts in the area, they might have caused less collateral damage. Waco could have been a lot cleaner had the listened to the local cops telling the big bad FBI guys not to run in there thinking they could just overrun a bunch of dug in well armed men. A geek on staff might have saved them some time.

      Personally, I would have taken all the equipment myself anyway if I was doing it if I thought for a second the owner or company itself was involved.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:Still unreasonable seizure - cause irrelevant by Torodung · · Score: 1

      The chain of evidence issues are enormous. How the hell do you secure a crime scene, with probable cause and warrant in hand, when it is potentially critical infrastructure, not to mention that the infrastructure simultaneously serves as physical records, physical assets, forensic evidence and perhaps a common carrier?

      What the heck are the "rules of evidence" for that mess? It can't be the same as the rules for shutting down a moonshine operation. I imagine those rules are soon to be written.

      --
      Toro

  15. FBI doing what they can to help the economic stimu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sad thing is the number of innocent companies they hurt by pulling all of their equipment. Oh, but the best thing is that the FBI was willing to return the equipment AFTER they had a copy of the data. Unfortunately, the hacks that work for the FBI with their A+ certs don't know how to reconnect the enterprise-level equipment they confiscated anyhow. Worse, they weren't prepared to receive that amount of data. I think the phrase I heard was, "we've got a couple of 1U servers here you can use." Sheesh!

  16. Re:What is this about, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's next, they'll say they want to recover a lost human embryo mistakenly packaged inside a server rack?

    Oh no! That's exactly where I put those test tubes! How did they ever find them?!

  17. Re:Government agencies as the long arm of capitali by BlackSabbath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While poignant, I hardly think a quote from damn near a century ago is particularly relevant. You might as well be quoting Shakespeare.

    Because the world is so different now?

    Let's update it a little then:
    "I helped make Iraq a decent place for the Haliburton boys to collect revenues in....I tried to bring light to Afghanistan for the Unocal Central Asian oil pipeline in 2002."

    The first step in repeating history is failing to see the relevance of past lessons. Whenever someone says "but things are SO different now" my bullshit detector goes off. Human beings aren't any different now than they were a thousand years ago.

  18. Re:Government agencies as the long arm of capitali by dotgain · · Score: 1

    Maybe the point of using a quote from "damn near a century ago" was to illustrate that such things have been going for, at least "damn near a century"

  19. Re:Government agencies as the long arm of capitali by Shark · · Score: 1

    The word you are looking for here is fascism, not capitalism.

    Fascism is when you have merger of big business interests with government (usually military) muscle.

    --
    Mind the frickin' laser...
  20. Wouldn't it have been easier if... by rennerik · · Score: 1

    ... AT&T and Verizon just cut off service to the DC and sued them? That way the entire datacenter, and innocent customers, wouldn't be taken offline (assuming they had other upstreams) and their servers wouldn't be in an FBI warehouse somewhere getting violated by scanning software.

    I still think the FBI took a broad swing at this, unless something else is going on here that we don't know about (which is entirely plausible).

  21. This is from the CEO of the company.... by RagnarIV · · Score: 5, Informative

    index
    Matthew Simpson
    Core IP Networks LLC

    Dear Customers,

    Today at 6:00am, the FBI conducted an unwarranted early morning raid of our 2323 Bryan Street Datacenters, on the 7th and 24th floors.

    I received a phone call at 6:05am from our NOC that the entire network was powered off. I called Capstar Commercial and TELX, our landlord, and was told that the FBI was in the datacenter with a search and seizure warrant. I asked that the agent in charge call me immediately.

    I received a call 15 minutes later from FBI Agent Allyn Lynd. Mr. Lynd would not tell me why he raided our datacenter or what he was looking for. He also accused me of hiding inside my house in Ovilla, Texas. I was actually in Phoenix, Arizona when this happened. I told him that, and he told me that he was "getting the dogs" after me, and hung up on me. I found out from an employee that there were 15 police cars and a SWAT team at my home in Ovilla.

    The FBI has seized all equipment belonging to our customers. Many customers went to the data center to try and retrieve their equipment, but were threatened with arrest.

    Neither I, nor Core IP are involved in any illegal activities of any kind. The only data that I have received thus far is that the FBI is investigating a company that has purchased services from Core IP in the past. This company does not even colocate with us anywhere, much less 2323 Bryan Street Datacenter.

    Currently nearly 50 businesses are completely without access to their email and data. Citizen access to Emergency 911 services are being affected, as Core IP's primary client base consists of telephone companies.

    If you run a datacenter, please be aware that in our great country, the FBI can come into your place of business at any time and take whatever they want, with no reason.

    I can be reached for further comment at: mnsclec@gmail.com
    Further information will be given as it becomes available.

    Yours,
    Matthew Simpson
    CEO, Core IP Networks, LLC

    direct link: http://sites.google.com/site/mnsclec/index //Just made an account to post this.

    1. Re:This is from the CEO of the company.... by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

      Today at 6:00am, the FBI conducted an unwarranted early morning raid of our 2323 Bryan Street Datacenters, on the 7th and 24th floors.

      A lie in the very first sentence? Sorry, fail. As myself and a few others pointed out yesterday when this story first popped up, sounds like something fishy is going on at Core IP.

    2. Re:This is from the CEO of the company.... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      To him the raid had no justification and was groundless. Where's the lie?

      http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/unwarranted

    3. Re:This is from the CEO of the company.... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      An amazingly poor word choice considering the context.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  22. Re:Government agencies as the long arm of capitali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well since we're apparently modding copy pasta from Wikipedia up to +5 Insightful today here then is my contribution of a couple of little quotes that somehow got omitted as well as my conclusions drawn from them.

    "When Major General Wendell C. Neville died in July 1930, many expected Butler to succeed him as Commandant of the Marine Corps.[21] Butler, however, had criticized too many things too often, and the recent death of his father, the congressman, had removed some of his protection from the hostility of his civilian superiors. Butler failed to receive the appointment, although he was then the senior major general on the active list."

    and

    In 1934, Butler came forward and reported to the U.S. Congress that a group of wealthy pro-Fascist industrialists had been plotting to overthrow the government of President Franklin D. Roosevelt in a military coup and had approached him to lead the coup.

    and

    Butler took up a lucrative career on the lecture circuit.

    So it would appear that Smedley didn't know when to keep his mouth shut and Daddy's untimely exit prevented him from covering Smedley's ass resulting in Smedley's career going down in flames. This was just two years after Wall Street went down in flames so Smedley was out of a job. He went on the lecture circuit to make ends meet where he starting developing his conspiracy theory with proto-Fascist industrialists playing a big role, which must have been popular with the common folks since someone had to be to blame for the stock market crash.

    In summary, Smedley Butler, a highly decorated Marine, torpedoes his own career with his mouth and then has to find someone other than himself to blame thus he attempts to shift the blame to shadowy industrialists who make much dinero from wars.

  23. Re:Government agencies as the long arm of capitali by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Isn't it amazing how some people seem to think that society has become this magical nice place to live in all of a sudden? ;)

      Great post.

    SB

    --
    It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  24. Hold on! something stinks about this by argoff · · Score: 1

    If verizon and AT&T were being defrauded, why not use the civil court system and file a law-suit? Why not just cut off services? What kind of fraud requires the FBI to raid datacenters right now, it's not like they're going anywhere? If they had enough evidence to raid, they should have had enough evidence to arrest the owners and press charges first at the very least.

    How do you defraud ATT and verizon anyhow? splice into their network? reverse bill them? Set up a 2nd tier provider dummy corp, provide services, and then fold it when the bill comes due? I mean, this isn't some fly by night scheme is it?

  25. Another type of DOS risk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets hope Slashdot has redundant datacenters. Never know who the FBI will strike next.

  26. me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so did you work in Costa Rica?they gained independence in 1981, i'm sure you had part of that.

    oil interests in 1914, your joking.

    funny haha, prove a point.

  27. Whats with these guys? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    Why is it every time I read a story related to these data center take downs, the people running the equipment write stories about the incident as if they were 12 year old kids who are trying to convince you that they didn't do anything wrong and it was someone else that was framing them.

    They also seem to always be involved with companies that don't last very long for one reason or another.

    In between their little 'its not my fault' whining and their history, these people are starting to look pretty questionable. I mean, I remember being twelve, I did this kind of stuff too, but then I grew up. Well, mostly grew up.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:Whats with these guys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't grow up and now they making a million bucks at AT&T expense, and you, so grown up, are still make a salary somewhere.
      Man, grow up!

  28. McFeds. by geekmux · · Score: 1

    "...It gives you the feeling that the FBI is acting as a collection agency for AT&T and Verizon.

    Ah, after the obscene confiscation of a LOT of hardware, and potential impact to hundreds of thousands of people, I'd say I have more than a "feeling" here.

    Note to self: Put the local FBI office on speed dial for the next time I get screwed in the fast food drive through. Since it seems damn near anyone can use these guys for strongarm tactics, I might as well jump in and take advantage of some of my tax money they're busy pissing away with shit like this.

  29. In the last story... by sudotron · · Score: 3, Interesting

    the speculation was that the FBI raided the data center for IP piracy. Which would, assuming they in fact had a warrant, be within the scope of criminal law, e.g. The Copyright act.

    However, I was under the impression that, in America, it was no violation of the law to owe someone money; at least until that person or corporation showed that money was owed or a contract was breached in a CIVIL suit.

    Or has the Federal Government legislated itself into that area as well?

    IANAL, etc.

    1. Re:In the last story... by shentino · · Score: 1

      Dodging a subpoena is contempt of court, and that IS a crime.

      Also, if there is a scam or a fraud at the root of the non-payment, that too is a crime. They call that theft of services.

  30. The important question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which judge authorized this, and what is our response as the defenders of the constitution. This is, ultimately, why we have the 2nd ammendment.

    1. Re:The important question by Toonol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is true, one of the reasons for the 2nd amendment is to put down an out of control government.

      However, one of the responsibilities that we have as possessors of the right to bear arms is to not start shooting with out good reason and clear heads. You, I, and everybody else on Slashdot don't know yet what the purpose of the fed's action was. Maybe the CEO is a criminal, and a number of the businesses are fronts. Maybe there was some clear and eminent danger that required a (legally warranted) search of the CEO's house and servers. We just don't know, the coverage of this event has been lousy. Don't run off half-cocked.

  31. Re:Government agencies as the long arm of capitali by BlackSabbath · · Score: 1

    Hilarious. The guy was twice decorated with the Congressional Medal of Honour and literally dedicated his life to the service of his country, while you snipe at his contribution from the safety of an AC shield. Chickenshit. You think he earned those medals because daddy was a congressman? I don't think so.

    These days of course, Generals tend to end up on the boards of the companies whose interests they serve so the embarassment that could arise from a new Smedley is vastly reduced.

  32. Re:Government agencies as the long arm of capitali by praksys · · Score: 1

    I tried to bring light to Afghanistan for the Unocal Central Asian oil pipeline in 2002.

    So that's the reason we invaded Afghanistan? Makes me wonder what Maj.Gen.Smedley Butler was leaving out of the original version.

  33. Re:Hold on! something stinks about this by mellon · · Score: 1

    Presumably the idea is that if there's warning of the raid, whatever records exist on the machines could be erased. So you hav to go in, cut the hardline, and take all the machines, or else your data will be gone.

    Although given that there was another raid on March 12, it's hard to imagine that someone who intended to erase records would not already have done so.

  34. Re:Government agencies as the long arm of capitali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [SARCASM]Oh we are, we have technology, and laws, and people fighting for democracy![/SARCASM]

  35. If its really about lost telco money by jonwil · · Score: 3, Informative

    If its really about money owed to the telcos by these VoIP providers, the right way for Verizon, AT&T etc to get their money back is to cut off whatever VoIP->PSTN gateway setup is being used. If its a 3rd party gateway, the third party gateway should be responsible for paying the telco and then the VoIP provider should be paying the 3rd party gateway.
    In any case, its possible to shut down whatever links are used to connect to the telcos networks

    1. Re:If its really about lost telco money by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      So the fix whatever is allowing them to commit th fraud. The guy committing the crime notices this happening and realize their on to him. Immediately he destroys all records of the fraud ...

      I'm not a cop and I can come up with about 20 different reasons why the should do EXACTLY what they did, all of which are completely justified in the right context.

      Too bad you're making assumptions without knowing any actual details.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:If its really about lost telco money by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Yeah, makes sense. If they cut them off, the dodgy VoIP providers will simply close up shop and reopen somewhere else under a new name and continue to find ways to place calls to the PSTN without paying for it.

    3. Re:If its really about lost telco money by bensch128 · · Score: 1

      Maybe AT&T and Verizon were worried that the VoIP providers would switch to other common carriers like MCI and Sprint if they only cut off the service.

      Maybe they wanted to crush all of the businesses at once by grabbing as much expensive hardware as possible.

      Wow, the FBI really do sound like a bunch of paid-off thugs in this scenario...

  36. Re:Government agencies as the long arm of capitali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As long as power is wielded at the discretion of human beings who can be influenced by wealth, capitalism will always tend toward fascism.

  37. Backwards by Unoriginal_Nickname · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The main sign that a company is about to go under is when they get the law involved. For some examples see the record labels, film studios and patent trolls. Even Apple is infamous for being excessively litigious prior to their current windfall.

    Normally business arrangements are reciprocal and it's in the best interests of a company to avoid publicizing that their partners are in breach of a contract. There are plenty of collections agencies in the private sector that they could have consulted instead, but instead it's being treated as a criminal matter. This is the sort of behavior you see when a company realizes that their business model is flawed.

    1. Re:Backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up +5 finance

  38. You bet! by toby · · Score: 1

    And now Obama's elected, all that bad stuff is stopped and it's never gonna happen anymore!!

    --
    you had me at #!
  39. Oh? by glwtta · · Score: 1

    So it wasn't about Wolverine like some jackass "speculated" for no reason? Shocking!

    Why do nerds always think the world revolves around the stupid crap only they care about? It's embarrassing.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
    1. Re:Oh? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      No, today its about VoIP fraud.

      Yet there is still no real evidence about what happened.

      Its good to see that news for nerds is just as sensationalist as fox news!

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  40. Concur by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    One of the original bits was that the FBI raided the house of the network service's CEO. This does not sound to me like an investigation of one of their customers. If it was, they would subpoena the information relating to the charges, and then determine what to do. Raiding the house of a corporate executive and siezing all computers under their control suggests that this is not about their customers at all.

    This smells fishy.

    But then, 911 changed everything. It was so bad, the FBI had to interrupt the service!

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  41. still seems fishy by einhverfr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mr Simpson said that he found out that his home was raided as well.

    You don't raid the HOME of the CEO of a company because you think their customers are involved in fraud. That makes less sense than the copyright violation speculation.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:still seems fishy by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      If you're searching for evidence of fraud, you go to where the subpoena says you can go. It makes no difference if the data resides on a backup tape or a memory stick in the dresser drawer of the CEO.

      They obviously believed that he had some evidence on his personal systems (accounting records, perhaps)

      I said it in the previous article and I'll say it again here.

      I actually know Matthew Simpson (we are not friends) and fraud is right up his alley. This raid couldn't have happened to a more deserving prick!

      This isn't his first run-in with the FBI!

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    2. Re:still seems fishy by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      A subpoena by itself usually isn't a cause for the SWAT team to show up. Furthermore, usually the subpoena'd party is given a chance to challenge the subpoena. This seems like a search and siezure warrant, not a subpoena. These are different processes.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    3. Re:still seems fishy by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you're absolutely right. Subpoena'd parties are obliged to comply.

      I was thinking warrant....

      Either way, I hope they find what they need this time. It would make my day to send him some lingerie in prison.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
  42. Re:Government agencies as the long arm of capitali by BlackSabbath · · Score: 1

    I tried to bring light to Afghanistan for the Unocal Central Asian oil pipeline in 2002.

    So that's the reason we invaded Afghanistan? Makes me wonder what Maj.Gen.Smedley Butler was leaving out of the original version.

    I take it you're referring to the attack on the Twin Towers. That was certainly a reason to go after Al-Qaeda - which was never a state or state instrument. Afghanistan however is not Al-Qaeda. The Taleban were certainly standing by Al-Qaeda when the world demanded they be handed over, yet invasion of a historically unconquerable place was never going to achieve the goal of routing Al-Qaeda out (perhaps leaning on the Saudi's to reign in the mullah's and Pakistan's ISI may have been more effective). By the way, where is Osama these days? Sunning himself in the Swat valley in Pakistan perhaps? Oddly, we've failed at both the overt and covert goals in Afghanistan. The Talebanisation of Pakistan continues apace while thugs like Baitullah Mehsud threaten new attacks on US soil. In fact, there are so many past lessons that have been ignored in Afghanistan they will provide future historians with ample fodder for a great many books.

  43. Looking forward to more fact checking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "/. wasn't upset because the FBI was enforcing the law. Most /.ers were upset because the FBI went in on a trumped up over-broad warrant and seized an entire data center."

    And "/." couldn't get even THAT right. It wasn't an entire data center. Just CoreIP's 50 machines.

    "Telephone delivered via voip is still an essential service. It's the best way to request emergency services (911). So why did the FBI cut off voip service to customers because their provider had been naughty? This is seriously unacceptable behavior."

    No, it's because VOIP isn't a telecommunications service and is usually stated in most TOS that they're under different regulatory treatment.

  44. Uwwwb.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The website of the guy they were after on the March 12th raid just went down today. It was www.uwwwb.com - he had a really excellent writeup of what had happened to him. He also said that he'd register uwwwb1.com and 2 etc if it was taken down, which as of now is not routed/pingable. This unjustice must end.

  45. Tin-foil hat time! by storkus · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who suspects that this isn't about unpaid fees or MPAA/RIAA mafiaa business, but rather about good old-fashioned tradecraft--i.e., state secrets. Remember, it's the CIA's game to spy, but the FBI's game to catch enemy spies and their drops and information. If this was the case and they didn't know where to look, they would just make up a bullshit story and seize everything, perhaps with a FISA warrant (which also explains why no one has actually seen it!).

    1. Re:Tin-foil hat time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and the worst part is they are trying to silence the people involved. Faulkner's website (uwwwb dot com) is down as of yesterday. He had a very detailed explanation of what he went through when they raided his house. I found a copy here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/13974347/mirror-of-wwwuwwwbcom-FBI-indiscriminate-actions-in-fascist-america

      BONUS: My captcha was 'repress' - hah.

  46. Something isn't right? by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

    What kind of crime requires a SWAT team to be dispatched to the CEO's house?

  47. Re:Hold on! something stinks about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I found out from an employee that there were 15 police cars and a SWAT team at my home in Ovilla"

    I believe they think you are guilty of something. One or more of your customers may have screwed you.

    Time to get a lawyer, and straighten this out. Maybe get the other customers equipment back.

  48. Re:Government agencies as the long arm of capitali by inKubus · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but so what? The "capitalists" are the ones paying for most of the government. And they are doing it so that they can provide you will all the luxuries you enjoy every day. If everyone in the US suddenly got a clue and cut back, you can rest assured they would be out of there faster than hell. But right now, we want stuff and we want it cheap, and therefore the government helps them out as much as possible. Everyone KNOWS, it just isn't talked about a lot in public. But it has done a LOT for America. Now, yes, it's starting to look like the tail is wagging the dog a little. That's why they are trying to increase the size of government again, to hopefully curtail that by sucking up all of the capital into slow moving bureaucracy. But that's the cycle, that's how the country is set up, and really how markets naturally function. America is simply the pinnacle of it due to the unprecendented freedoms we have here. Now, with all the freedom flowing around the world (possibly militarily imposed), since we've figured out it kinda works, you're seeing global enterprises. This is a period of great change for the country and the world. But the move towards globalism--and the conquering of countries to develop new markets--is not new, correct.

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  49. So what? by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

    Would you rather live in America, benefitting from the fucking of others, or live in those places, being fucked for the benefit of America?

    Sorry to tell ya, this is the way of the world. You either fight to get on top, fight to stay on top, or suffer at the bottom. You likely enjoy the standard of living you have today BECAUSE of the dirty deeds of your nation. This goes for France, Germany, England, Russia, the USA, Canada, the list goes on.

    In capitalism, man exploits man. In communism, it's the exact opposite.

    You can't change the game, you can only change the players

  50. Balogne!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It gives you the feeling that the FBI is acting as a collection agency for AT&T and Verizon.

    Yes, it does. and that infuriates me! Why is our government, our tax-dollars being spent to provide collection services for telcos, the RIAA, and the MPAA? WTF!

    OTOH, I this 'unpaid telco fees' could just be a cover story...

  51. Re:Government agencies as the long arm of capitali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heroism and insanity aren't mutually exclusive (and sometimes one might say the first *requires* the second).

    The part about Smedley's father shielding him is right in the wiki entry, by the way. Note that the guy you're calling "Chikenshit" for being anon up above didn't say anything about the medals coming from that connection (and the wiki specifically cites FDR as being the one who did the paperwork for the second medal). Not that "Black Sabbath" is much of a non-anonymous identity either...

  52. agreed, superb point, they'd never seize ILEC hw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    agreed, superb point, they'd never seize ILEC hardware, never, never ever, never ever, the only reason they did here was they knew they could get away with it, they took out a small guy, totally unacceptable, in every way. True, we do not know all the facts yet, and I am not commenting on the facts as I do not know them yet (like the rest of us). But the turn-off customer's phones because someone stole something is insane. They could have cut-off the pipe the data center if they were really concerned about that. They didn't turn-off the pipe, they didn't subpoena data on the drives, they didn't confiscate just the drives, they didn't even arrest the supposed people in charge of the company first, or at the same time, if theyre so guilty, why not? They couldn't wait one more day to get the people at the same time as the data? If ATT & Verzion say someone is not treating them fairly (which by the way is laughable that *they*, of all people, would darn to say that) then go in & sniff their traffic for a week & see if its true. They didn't do that. They seized a van load of millions of dollars of gear & drove away. Including other people's gear. Something aint right here people.

  53. Re:Government agencies as the long arm of capitali by BlackSabbath · · Score: 1

    Not that "Black Sabbath" is much of a non-anonymous identity either...

    Everyone's identity here is anonymous (except to the admins and the authorities if they cared). The difference is that everyone with an ID carries the history of their postings which forms a record of their discourse. Whether I disagree with others here or not, I respect those that have the balls carry with them their past opinions. AC's wipe the slate clean with every post. With AC's I can't tell if I'm dealing with one or many. While there are definitely valid reasons for posting AC, as a longtime slashdotter I much prefer posts by IDs than ACs.

    Anyway, I think I better stop before I disappear up my own arse.

    The name's Mike by the way. I live in Melbourne, Australia. And that's about as un-anonymous as its gonna get online (my surname is quite unique, to the point where everyone in Australia with my surname is a direct family member and everyone in the world with my surname is clan related).

  54. Cache Uwwwb.com (March 12th raid on Crydon..link) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello, this is CygonX. Our Hosting Data Center has suffered a major disaster: Namely the FBI storming the Data Center and the company's owner's home (that's me). The FBI took an entire data center, hundreds of servers, routers, switches, UPS system, cabinets, monitors, printers, and even power strips...as evidence.

    You would expect this kind of totalitarian storm-trooper activity in the name of the war on drugs, the war on terror, or etc. But the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation actually did NO investigation. They took the statements of two ex-employees of the company, one of which was fired for drug use, and the other of which was also fired...and has a pending FBI investigation against him that he is desperately trying to snitch his way out of...by making up crazy stories about his past employer.

    What were they looking for? Well thatâ(TM)s a tricky question, and I am not even sure they know, but the short answer is $6.1 Million Dollars. Hang in there, the story gets more interesting.

    As many of you may know I have played the role of Network Security guy Sean Dillion, AKA CygonX for many years. Truthfully, that wasnâ(TM)t even my real name. CygonX was a lot like Santa Claus, and has actually been played by many people over the years in order to manage the site, but I am the original and current owner. My real name is Mike Faulkner, and I have hosted the Network Security forum and community at this domain name since sometime in early 2002. However, I am not a lowly Network Security guy, and never was.

    I was the CEO of a small tech company when I took over the site, and I hosted it off my own network on a pair of T1s. That company went under, taking most of my money with it, and UWWWB was actually hosted off a cable modem for a period of time from an equipment rack in my home. This is my forum and community that I have nourished for years.

    Over the years, I have bought, sold, and built a large number of small tech companies. I worked my way up, with 100 hour work weeks, and by taking almost no money out personally for many years. For the past few years I have been a very active venture capitalist. Investing in various small technology businesses, and using them to support each other. My VoIP Companies used my Hosting Companies, which leased space in my Data Centers, and etc. This was the Crydon Capital Corporations family of companies. Crydon Technology, was the data center and hosting company that the FBI raided in Dallas MArch 12th, 2009. UWWWB was tucked away on a tiny server in the data center for years, and we never even got a single complaint from RIAA, or MPPA, or anyone. This is not just about UWWWB, although the FBI certainly is holding it against me for running a security site.

    Here's what happened: March 12th, 2009, at about 5:AM in the morning, my home alarm system goes off. I get up to see whatâ(TM)s going on, on maybe 3 hours of sleep, and my wife points out there are two people with flash lights in my back yard. Now, this may not be unusual for everyone, but I live in a $700,000 home in Southlake Texas, the United States highest per-capita income city for 2008. A very nice community, virtually no crime, and excellent schools. That is to say, I do not live in a shack in the hood, this is the high-income suburbs, no one had any business in my backyard at 5:AM. So I run out the back door of my home, thinking I was about to confront some crackheads trying to steal the copper off my AC unit or something. And although I couldnâ(TM)t quite see them yet I heard the very authoritative voice of what appeared to be law enforcement officers, with the radio noise to go with them. They proceeded with the expected dialogue, "stop", "show me your hands", "hands in the air" etc. They didn't shoot me, and sadly that really was the highlight of my day. I assumed my alarm had triggered by itself and the cops had been called, as we had problems with the alarm system before. They handcuffed me, while I was telling them I was the home owner. No big deal, they

  55. Sounds like my own experience with the FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This sounds eerily similar to my own experience with the FBI. Our tiny basement apt was raided a few years ago by about a dozen armed agents for a relatively minor copyright case involving my husband's website. They seized every computer they could find, handcuffed us, pointed guns at us, and started asking us questions that made it clear they thought the money involved was literally 10,000x more than it actually was.

    A few days later, we got a lawyer who got a copy of the affidavit upon which the warrant was based, and it was full of many gross errors - factual errors such as background checks run on the wrong social security number, references to cease and desist notices that were never received because they were sent to an email address at nonexistent domain, etc.

    Consulting lawyers from the EFF and Stanford said that if represented properly he would probably eventually be found innocent, but only after a protracted appeals process that would disrupt our lives for years. In the end, he pled to a misdemeanor. Basically they wore us down.

    When I hear things in the news about FBI raids, I would be very skeptical of the initial statements from the law enforcement side. Because apparently the FBI does not have to have an accurate accounting or understanding of the facts. Yet most people assume they do. I certainly did before this happened to us. The difference between my prior impression of the FBI's competence and integrity vs what I actually experienced over the course of the next several years - it was immense.

  56. toyotabedzrock by toyotabedzrock · · Score: 1

    Since when is it the FBI job to handle late payments? Either they have far overstepped there bounds or this is not the real reason. If you don't pay a bill you get disconnected then sued.

  57. Covering story by mhollis · · Score: 1

    I have been covering this story and hope to talk to the FBI and the CEO of Core IP on Monday. Any questions you want asked?

    Story is here.

    --
    Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
    1. Re:Covering story by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 1

      examiner is as bad as slashdot.

      There is no news there - just ill informed opinion and wild speculation.

      Move along, troll.....

  58. 800 Phone bills are unlikely to be the issue by isdnip · · Score: 1

    First off, I am acquainted with the owner of Core IP, and am aware of what he was doing with 800 numbers in 2005-2006 (when the 800 rules changed). The FCC rules for intercarrier compensation are not clear and he thought he was exploiting a real loophole, to allow dial-up Internet access to rural areas.

    The FCC writes orders and rules for specific point cases, not general rules, so as things change, the rules don't cover them. That's how VoIP happened -- it is not in the rules and you can argue about what rules actually apply when. And they've not fixed this for 12 years. 800 had some ambiguities too.

    The 800 issue was about direct calls between local carriers. You could point an 800 number at a local carrier to receive the call, and that carrier would get billed by the caller's carrier. A third party would own the 800 number itself and not get billed. Someone told Matt that there was no charge for such calls. In fact, Verizon didn't know how to bill for them (they fixed this) so they looked free, and in SBC's case, a contract quirk meant they really were free. But some smaller phone companies were really angry and they got the 800 system fixed to require more consent in setting up the numbers.

    When this type of thing happens, the phone companies send out bills and argue about them. ISP servers have no connection. Core IP was not the company doing the 800 stuff.

  59. FCC says no, go to FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AT&T has tried this method in the past and been slapped down by the FCC in apparently similar cases. Apparently the new game is to call it criminal fraud instead of a civil fraud were the FCC has repeatedly said no. See AudioText International, Ltd. v. AT&T

  60. re: It's days like these, I *respect* Slashdot! by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    WHY do people continue to think it's ok for the federal government to barge in and start seizing things willy-nilly, before any charges are filed - and disrupting business for people who have NOTHING to do with what they're after??

    Additionally, it's well known that the big telcos can't be 100% trusted when it comes to "fees owed"! I agree that we don't have enough facts yet to say exactly what's going on, but I choose to err on the side of the company intruded upon, right now. One only has to look at their OWN monthly telco bill from someone like AT&T to see how shady they are about raising prices in the form of "taxes", "tariffs" and impossible to decipher fees. Or look at the contracts they lock people into for as long as 5 years at a time for a simple T1 circuit, only to charge insane fees to break the contract if the circuit no longer meets the needs or best interests of the buyer. (And yes, I realize nobody forces anyone to sign a contract -- but all too often, AT&T and one of their circuits provides the ONLY reasonable way for a given place to get connected to the Internet, or to run their PBX system, thanks to their physical location.)

    None of this even touches on AT&T's willingness to stomp on our collective privacy rights with the wiretapping nonsense!

  61. WISH I COULD MARK YOU UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish I could mark you up!

  62. Re: It's days like these, I *respect* Slashdot! by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 1

    I choose to err

    [Edited for brevity and clarity]