Slashdot Mirror


Conviction of Sen. Ted Stevens Is Thrown Out

A federal judge has thrown out the conviction of the senator who educated us all about the true nature of the Internet. Ted Stevens had been convicted last fall of lying about free home renovations that he received from an oil contractor, 8 days before he lost his Senate re-election bid. The judge blasted the US Department of Justice prosecutors for mishandling the case in ways that might rise to the level of criminality. "In 25 years on the bench, I have never seen anything approach the mishandling and misconduct in this case," Judge Emmet G. Sullivan said. He called the allegations "shocking and disturbing." According to the article, "Several jurors have told The Washington Post that the evidence against Stevens was overwhelming during a month-long trial that ended in October."

7 of 440 comments (clear)

  1. Re:This is bullshit by stonecypher · · Score: 5, Informative

    The practice of law used to require one book, when we found this nation maybe a 100

    This is complete fiction. The Shakers took years to produce our legal system, and produced nearly a thousand books to describe it. At no point has the legal system you described existed in this nation.

    Stop making points by making up stories.

    --
    StoneCypher is Full of BS
  2. Common Law by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yeah, considering that our legal system is a Common Law system, and that it inherited from British Common Law with all it's many-centuries history, it's ridiculous to think that legal practice was ever simple enough to be contained in only a hundred books, much less one.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  3. Re:No, Lets be REALLY clear by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Stevens in his OWN VOICE recorded talking with Allen:
    STEVENS: That's, that's the way it should be. But as a practical matter, the question is, what can they convince the jury, uh grand jury, to charge us with? That's the problem. But when I was a district attorney, I handled grand juries, lots of them. They're funny people, but they also are people from within the community. And your reputation and everything else comes into play, as far as grand juries are concerned ... We ought to just cool it. I told Ben the same thing: just cool it, you know, go about our business and smile and have a happy face ... Do the things you used to do and just keep going. If it's a violation of the elections law, that's a corporate violation. This thing, it shouldn't, it shouldn't get to your mind, old buddy."
    ALLEN: Well it has been, I'll tell you."
    STEVENS:...You've got to get a mental attitude that these guys can't really hurt us. You know, they're not going shoot us. It's not Iraq. What the hell? The worst that can be done, the worst that can happen to us is we round up a bunch of legal fees and might lose and we might have to pay a fine, might have to serve a little time in jail. I hope to Christ it never gets to that ...

    Oh yeah it sounds like an innocent man there, not one playing the odds that his massive Alaska support base will get him off of whatever he does. He *knew* it was illegal and did it anyway.

    He also readily admitted he didn't pay for many of the things he received; the grill, the furniture, the permanent generator, the massage chair. Yet he didn't disclose those things as he was *legally obligated* to do.

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  4. Re:Still Sounds Guilty to Me by sribe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, if you'd followed the trial, you'd know that he did a whole heck of a lot of renovations, and actually paid for a lot of them. In that context, not noticing having never received an additional bill for more work is at least plausible, unlike having never received the bill.

  5. Re:Is He Guilty by DrgnDancer · · Score: 4, Informative

    And again I feel compelled to mention that the President and AG during the this whole process were Republicans. Christ. This is the second brain dead: "The Dems trumped up charges to hurt a real conservative" post I've seen that totally ignores the fact that a Republican government did this. What did Obama go back in time and setup a "Shadow-DOJ" to do his bidding a year or more before his actual election?

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  6. Re:Still Sounds Guilty to Me by Moryath · · Score: 4, Informative

    See response to "PopeRatzo."

    The prosecutors involved in this malicious, illegal prosecution "just so happen" to be lifelong Democrats. The "Bush DOJ" had nothing to do with it.

  7. Re:Still Sounds Guilty to Me by ameyer17 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I bet he thinks Clinton was commander-in-chief on 9/11, too. Don't laugh. I've heard it said on "conservative" talk radio.

    To be fair, Clinton does deserve blame for some of what led to 9/11, even though he wasn't in office on 9/11.
    Then again, the blame goes at least as far back as Reagan giving Osama weapons to fight the Soviets with.