EFF Says Obama Warrantless Wiretap Defense Is Worse than Bush
SonicSpike writes "The Electronic Frontier Foundation has just said that 'In the warrantless wiretapping case, Obama DOJ's new arguments are worse than Bush's.'"
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
Without much more than a speculative sentence in the summary, what is slashdot going to talk about? We're not going to RTFA no matter how hard you try!!
*WE SHALL WE SHALL NOT BE MOVED!!*
Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
If they don't tap the phones, how will they know that we're getting the "Change we can believe in"?
Tibbon
tibbon.com
Hey, you asked for a government that would listen to the people...
Now that you've got one, you're all mad and stuff. Man, this democracy stuff is weird. There's just no pleasing you people!
Are there any countries left that has citizens? I'm tired of being a subject.
Well.... he said change, and the EFF says his arguments are worse than Bush's, so I suppose that qualifies.
William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
It's quite simply one word: Hope.
of the 9/11s???!