Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Mentioned In Virginia Terrorism Report

megamerican alerted us to a leaked document (PDF) from a Virginia Fusion Center titled "2009 Virginia Terrorism Threat Assessment." The document is marked as "Law Enforcement Sensitive," not to be shown to public. Citizens for Legitimate Government has a write-up. Slashdot gets a mention on page 45 — not as a terrorist organization itself, but as one of the places that members of Anonymous may hang out: "A 'loose coalition of Internet denizens,' Anonymous consists largely of users from multiple internet sites such as 4chan, 711chan, 420chan, Something Awful, Fark, Encyclopedia Dramatica, Slashdot, IRC channels, and YouTube. Other social networking sites are also utilized to mobilize physical protests. ... Anonymous is of interest not only because of the sentiments expressed by affiliates and their potential for physical protest, but because they have innovated the use of e-protests and mobilization. Given the lack of a unifying creed, this movement has the potential to inspire lone wolf behavior in the cyber realms." According to the report, cell phones and digital music players have been used to transfer plans related to criminal activity, and therefore presumably could be grounds for suspicion. Podcasting is also suspicious.

75 of 779 comments (clear)

  1. A.C. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Lone wolf" sound MUCH better than anonymous coward!

    1. Re:A.C. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Anonymous working as a group is probably the biggest joke on the media I've heard in a while. It's like saying all unsolved murder mysteries are caused by the same terrorist group (until each murder is solved!)

      They just don't understand the joke, do they?

    2. Re:A.C. by Assmasher · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Genius. How great would it be if Slashdot changed 'Anonymous Coward' to Lone Wolf for a few weeks?

      --
      Loading...
    3. Re:A.C. by apostrophesemicolon · · Score: 5, Funny

      in related news,
      a coalition of persons of interest is growing at an exponential rate on the Internets. Members of the group, posting in various websites under the handle, Guest, often post provocative and sometimes unlawful comments. By using the handle name "Guest", they were afforded anonymity.

      Several related groups are Anonymous, Anonymous Coward, Public, Guest, and Unregistered.

    4. Re:A.C. by severoon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Anonymous consists largely of users from multiple internet sites such as...

      How can any member of Anonymous be "from" a site like fark? Do they issue Anonymous press pass credentials or something?

      This gets the whole idea of Anonymous wrong. Anonymous isn't "from" anywhere. The moment you start thinking you know something about Anonymous, the moment you start trying to put Anonymous into a box, you're no longer talking about Anonymous...you're talking onymous.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    5. Re:A.C. by rootofevil · · Score: 3, Informative

      i think what they are trying to imply is that the group coalesces around the named sites for communication and organization.

      also, im somewhat skeptical of them naming fark, and /.

      *chan on the other hand...

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    6. Re:A.C. by bwhaley · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes! This is a hilarious idea. How can we convince the Taco? We need to all band together. Perhaps we can submit an article to Digg about the idea and we can all Digg it :).

      --
      "I either want less corruption, or more chance
      to participate in it." -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    7. Re:A.C. by RobBebop · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From the U.S. Constitution, Ammendment 1:

      Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble , and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

      The keyword is "peaceably", but TFS seems to imply that they are trying to prohibit people from assembling, which is unconstitutional.

      The correct response, I believe, is to arrange a "peaceful assembly" on the front door of the "Virginia Fusion Center" and generate enough publicity from the press so these clowns in Virginia can be made to understand that internet sites like Slashdot.org don't make any attempt to rally any violent political movements.

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    8. Re:A.C. by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Funny
      "in related news,

      a coalition of persons of interest is growing at an exponential rate on the Internets. Members of the group, posting in various websites under the handle, Guest, often post provocative and sometimes unlawful comments. By using the handle name "Guest", they were afforded anonymity."

      Not only that...but, I hear there are people who actually register accounts with FALSE or misleading information as to their true identity. Pseudonyms and the like.

      What the hell is this country coming to?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:A.C. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Worst kept secret. Everyone knows you can take the output of a Slashdot article with comments where a website has been slashdotted, pipe that through a Perl script to filter for the coded messages, and print the message out backwards to be read in a mirror. :P

  2. Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    All your base are belong to us.

  3. Who is this anonymous? by rimcrazy · · Score: 3, Funny

    .. and what can we do to stop him!!!

    or her

    or it

    or them

    or they

    or ... no wait. It's me AAAAAAAAAhhhhhhhhhhhh

    --
    "TV, a medium as it is neither rare nor well done." Ernie Kovacs
    1. Re:Who is this anonymous? by sakdoctor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let's post our real names.

      I'm David.

    2. Re:Who is this anonymous? by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nice to meet you, Dave. I'm Spartacus.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    3. Re:Who is this anonymous? by idontgno · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's so weird, I'm Spartacus too!

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    4. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Bigbutt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    5. Re:Who is this anonymous? by gaderael · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm Spartacus!

      --
      Anyone got a light for my sig?
    6. Re:Who is this anonymous? by AnalPerfume · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm Spartacus & so is my wife.

    7. Re:Who is this anonymous? by marcop · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are some who call me, "Tim".

    8. Re:Who is this anonymous? by x_IamSpartacus_x · · Score: 5, Funny

      No seriously... x_IamSpartacus_x !!!!!

    9. Re:Who is this anonymous? by morethanapapercert · · Score: 4, Funny
      My name is Legion

      (Mark 5:9)

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    10. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Unnngh! · · Score: 3, Funny

      My name is Robert Paulson...

    11. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Chyeld · · Score: 4, Funny

      His name is Robert Paulson.

    12. Re:Who is this anonymous? by papasui · · Score: 3, Funny

      So when she yells out your name in bed do you ever think she's cheating on you with herself? Also pics.

    13. Re:Who is this anonymous? by AnalPerfume · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually it occurs to me if she's referring to the cat, who is also called Spartacus.

  4. Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm Anonymous.

    1. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, *I* am Anonymous!!

    2. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I am David

    3. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, not me.. I'm spartacus.

    4. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Will the real Anonymous please stand up?

    5. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dave? Dave's not here.

    6. Re:Me too by Hurricane78 · · Score: 5, Funny

      (nothing happens)

      Mr. Anonymous has learned the first lesson of not being seen: Not to stand up.

      Unfortunately, Mr. Anonymous chose a very obvious target.

      *BOOO...Euuuuuuaaahhhh...OOOM*

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    7. Re:Me too by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Voila! In view humble vaudevillian veteran, cast vicariously as both victim and villain by the vicissitudes of fate. This visage, no mere veneer of vanity, is a vestige of the "vox populi" now vacant, vanished. However, this valorous visitation of a bygone vexation stands vivified, and has vowed to vanquish these venal and virulent vermin, van guarding vice and vouchsafing the violently vicious and voracious violation of volition.
      The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta, held as a votive not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous.
      Verily this vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose, so let me simply add that it's my very good honour to meet you and you may call me V.

      --
      In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
  5. Is Slashdot a Terrorist Organization Or Not by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

    Points in favor
    * It hijacks internet bandwidth that could be used more productively
    * It performs DDOS attacks on an hourly basis.
    * Millions of hours diverted from productive programming to non-productive uses
    * CSS that makes site look like someone vomited on your monitor.
    * The Idle section

    Points against
    * Millions of anti-social, hormone filled misfits are kept off the streets where they could do real harm.

    We report the facts. YOU decide.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Is Slashdot a Terrorist Organization Or Not by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't forget:

      * Promotes non-mainstream, rabid devotion to fanatical religions--including Linux and OSS.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  6. of course! by Lord+Ender · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is well known that Commander Taco is actually a commander in the Judean Peoples' Front terrorist organization. Titles like "Cmdr" just aren't given out to anyone. He's their #2 man.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:of course! by spydum · · Score: 5, Funny

      Judean People's Front can suck it! People's Front of Judea 4 LIFE!

    2. Re:of course! by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Funny

      Judean People's Front?

      Splitter

      --
      An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  7. Terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since when were protests "terrorism"?

    1. Re:Terrorism by Cornwallis · · Score: 5, Informative

      from the site: Seven Signs of Terrorism Certain activities, especially those at or near sensitive facilities, including government, military or other high profile sites or places where large numbers of people congregate, may indicate terrorist planning phases. Suspicious activities of interest that should be reported to law enforcement are commonly referred to as the 7 Signs of Terrorism. Surveillance: Recording or monitoring activities. May include drawing diagrams, note taking, use of cameras, binoculars or other vision-enhancing devices or possessing floor plans or blueprints of key facilities. Elicitation: Attempts to obtain operation, security and personnel-related information regarding a key facility. May be made by mail, fax, e-mail, telephone or in person. Tests of Security: Attempts to measure reaction times to security breaches or to penetrate physical security barriers or procedures in order to assess strengths and weaknesses. Acquiring Supplies: Attempts to improperly acquire items that could be used in a terrorist act. May include the acquisition of explosives, weapons, harmful chemicals, flight manuals, law enforcement or military equipment, uniforms, identification badges or the equipment to manufacture false identification. Suspicious Persons: Someone who does not appear to belong in a workplace, neighborhood or business establishment due to their behavior, including unusual questions or statements they make. Dry Runs/Trial Runs: Behavior that appears to be preparation for a terrorist act without actually committing the act. Activity could include mapping out routes and determining the timing of traffic lights and flow. Deploying Assets: Placing people, equipment and supplies into position to commit the act. This is the last opportunity to alert authorities before the terrorist act occurs.

    2. Re:Terrorism by kiwimate · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Dry Runs/Trial Runs: Behavior that appears to be preparation for a terrorist act without actually committing the act. Activity could include mapping out routes and determining the timing of traffic lights and flow.

      Dammit. A group of us did this in Auckland city one Friday night when I was a bit younger and we were bored. Any casual observer would've seen a group of six or seven of us carefully timing the traffic lights at the bottom of Queen Street for, oh, 20 or 30 minutes.

      After we'd figured out the timing perfectly, we executed our nefarious plot. As soon as the lights turned red, we rushed into the middle of the intersection with a small couch, a couple of chairs, and a lamp, set up a mock living room, quickly took some photographs, and rushed back to safety just as the lights turned green.

      And we thought we were just having some innocent fun on a Friday night!

    3. Re:Terrorism by Zelig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Since they demonstrate the tactical capacity to put a bunch of people in a place, at a time, without law enforcement getting a sniff of it beforehand.

      Don't think of it as terrorism per se: think of it as a people-organizing toolset, and it ought to terrify any police state who's paying attention. To the extent the US behaves like a police state, this is a threat.

      Take a look at Improv Everywhere's Cell Phone Symphony. Heck, much of what IE does is militarily relevant. It says, "We're a bunch of peaceful clowns. But if we'd wanted to get you, you'd have been got". It says "Your security theater is irrelevant".

  8. Ha! by mccalli · · Score: 5, Funny

    ""A 'loose coalition of Internet denizens,' Anonymous consists largely of users from multiple internet sites such as 4chan, 711chan, 420chan, Something Awful, Fark, Encyclopedia Dramatica, Slashdot, IRC channels, and YouTube. "

    In your face, Digg! Yeah!

  9. Re:Level Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Xbox Live Achievement Unlocked: You are now a terrorist!

  10. That silly Constitution by WCMI92 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How DARE citizens engage in the rights to:

    Free speech
    Assembly
    Petition the government (or government institutions).

    Why those subversives who not only wrote it into law, but preceded those rights with the words "Congress shall make no law abridging..." must have been terrorists or something.

    No wonder this was marked "not to show to public". How dare we engage in such subversion of the LAW enforcement establishment.

    The way I read this is that they are setting up pretexts for "probable cause" to detain and search people who engage in normal, legal behavior. Yet more evidence that the "war on terror" and the PATRIOT act are being used to expand law enforcement power over the law abiding, when instead such energy would be better spent guarding the porous borders or monitoring the FOREIGN FUNDED (Saudi) mosques (which is where most world wide terrorism originates).

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
    1. Re:That silly Constitution by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      when instead such energy would be better spent guarding the porous borders or monitoring the FOREIGN FUNDED (Saudi) mosques (which is where most world wide terrorism originates).

      [citation needed]

      Perhaps you're unaware of the terrorism that occurs in central Africa on a daily basis, that is conveniently ignored? Or does that not count because it doesn't greatly affect American economic interests?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:That silly Constitution by Raenex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A terrorist attacks civilian targets. Freedom fighters attack military targets. There is a big difference.

      You can be a freedom fighter and a terrorist. When will American history books call the people behind the Boston Tea Party terrorists? There's also the matter of a couple of nuclear bombs on Japan, and the fire bombing of Dresden.

  11. Re:Anon by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You laugh, but Ted Kennedy has already be caught up in this sort of nonsense.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  12. Re:Q: anonymous in an organization? by FroBugg · · Score: 4, Informative

    They're talking about the group Anonymous, mostly from 4chan. They were responsible for some reasonably large and well-organized protests against Scientology not too long ago. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_(group)

  13. VA better watch out! by rotide · · Score: 5, Insightful
    VA better watch itself, all of us Slashdoters may assemble, protest and overthrow their state government!

    Slashdot is known for being a terrorist hotbed of activity.

    Seriously though, is it getting just so utterly bullshit that they list Slashdot as a potential terrorist hangout? I mean, really? Is the government this god damned stupid? I suppose in the back of my mind I always knew it was, but wow.

    I don't want to come off as a nutjob here, but this country is falling down hard. A new revolution in the next 100 years appears to be more than possible at this point. Laws are getting absolutely ridiculous.

    I realize VA is far from the federal government, but this "OMG EVERY1 IZ TERRORIZT!" stuff is getting really scary.

    Terrorist.. This decades Communist.. Make lists and round 'em up, boys!

    Fucking scary.

  14. Re:Kind of funny by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Ethnic cleansing" would be a better description of what the founding of America was based on.

    Terrorism is something else and a term that gets abused to the point of making it meaningless.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  15. Re:Level Up by Vanders · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who paid off Virginia state to label Anonymous as a terrorist organization

    Scientology. Or Habbo.com. Either could be the culprit.

    how much of Anonymous will be loyal enough to stick around

    That's such an illogical conjecture I'm not sure where to start. "Anonymous" isn't some sort of highly organised group. It's just a bunch of people on various websites. Going to those websites doesn't make you a terrorist, or a furry, or a protester, or whatever it is someone else is doing. "Stick around"? Makes no sense.

  16. On /. by infuriatedweasel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anonymous is a coward, so I don't think they have anything to worry about.

  17. Re:Anon by cthulu_mt · · Score: 4, Informative

    In fairness though, we already know that Ted Kennedy is a murderer.

    --
    Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
  18. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by u38cg · · Score: 5, Funny

    I seriously wonder who the hell their base belong to when they come up with idiocy like this. 4chan? Terrorists? Yeah, they terrorise people with pictures of cats with bad grammar skills. Sometimes they post foolish people's personal details. Clearly a threat to the free world as we know it. *shakes head*

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
  19. Re:Level Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anonymous is a microcosm of society. There is no formal method for joining. There are no membership lists or membership dues.

    There are people doing good things (for whatever you consider good), people doing bad things (for whatever you consider bad), people doing neutral things (for any other action), and people doing nothing.

    When someone says "Anonymous will do xyz", they're not charging everyone who associates themselves with the group to do xyz. They are simply invoking the protection of being lost in a crowd and the protection of free association.

    All things that, in and of themselves, are perfectly legal in the United States. However, what is done once under the cloak of these protections, on the other hand, may be illegal.

    Personally, Anonymous scares me a hell of a lot less than the far right militia groups (which, by the way, all do the same thing and are legal).

  20. Terrorism Report by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Our report on the terrorist group is complete."
    "What did you find?"
    "Well, for one thing, we think they have been using the web to visit popular websites."
    "Okay... what else?"
    "Our findings indicate they have been eating food, possibly sourced from restaurants. Also, we think they've been engaging in verbal communication."
    "That doesn't exactly narrow it down, does it? Based on that, almost anyone could be a susp... oh! I get it. Nice work!"

  21. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by LordKaT · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Who the hell their base belong to?"

    You've just terrorized my brain.

  22. Re:Anonymous defined by snsr · · Score: 5, Informative

    Church of Scientology are a bunch of deluded d-bags.

  23. Terrorist tools proliferation by Intron · · Score: 5, Funny

    According to the report, cell phones and digital music players have been used to transfer plans related to criminal activity, and therefore presumably could be grounds for suspicion. Podcasting is also suspicious.

    I am told that terrorists now have access to a medium that can't be wiretapped, can be folded or rolled up for ease of concealment, and can be destroyed in seconds with an ordinary match. I'm hoping that the authorities don't paper over this threat. This stuff is so cheap it practically grows on trees.

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  24. Re:Level Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's such an illogical conjecture I'm not sure where to start. "Anonymous" isn't some sort of highly organised group. It's just a bunch of people on various websites. Going to those websites doesn't make you a terrorist, or a furry, or a protester, or whatever it is someone else is doing. "Stick around"? Makes no sense.

    That's basically what the report actually says about Anonymous. They got a mention and a small write-up in the report because a few individuals identifying with them committed minor acts of vandalism. It says that they aren't really an organized group. The main reason they're even mentioned seems to be to give an example of people coordinating protests or actions online.

    The "phones and ipod" section just gives examples of how terrorists and organized criminals were taking advantage of technology-- examples which are already pretty well-known, really.

    This isn't alarmism on the part of the Virginia government. The summary is silly.

  25. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Funny
    4chan? Terrorists? Yeah, they terrorise people with pictures of cats with bad grammar skills. Sometimes they post foolish people's personal details. Clearly a threat to the free world as we know it.

    You may say that, but I have contacts within the inner circle of Anonymous, and I'm given to understand that they have a laser. And they're charging it. And they don't afraid of anything.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  26. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    remeber bretheren....

    4f 6e 6c 79 20 72 65 61 6c 6c 79 20 73 74 75 70 69 64 20 70 61 72 61 6e 6f 69 64 73 20 74 68 69 6e 6b 20 74 68 61 74 20 74 68 65 72 65 20 69 73 20 61 20 73 65 63 72 65 74 20 73 6f 63 69 65 74 79 20 74 72 79 69 6e 67 20 74 6f 20 67 65 74 20 74 68 65 6d 2e 20 20 20 50 65 6f 70 6c 65 20 69 6e 20 67 65 6e 65 72 61 6c 20 61 72 65 20 74 6f 6f 20 6c 61 7a 79 20 74 6f 20 61 63 74 20 65 6e 2d 6d 61 73 73 65 27 20 74 6f 20 64 69 73 72 75 70 74 20 74 68 69 6e 67 73 20 69 66 20 74 68 65 79 20 61 72 65 20 63 6f 6d 66 6f 72 74 61 62 6c 65 2e 20 20 49 66 20 79 6f 75 20 61 72 65 20 63 72 65 61 74 69 6e 67 20 6d 69 73 65 72 79 20 61 6e 64 20 64 65 61 74 68 20 66 6f 72 20 61 20 67 72 6f 75 70 2c 20 74 68 65 6e 20 62 79 20 61 6c 6c 20 6d 65 61 6e 73 20 77 6f 72 72 79 2e 0a 0a 42 75 74 20 74 68 65 73 65 20 70 65 6f 70 6c 65 20 61 72 65 20 73 69 6d 70 6c 79 20 63 6c 75 74 63 68 69 6e 67 20 61 74 20 73 74 72 61 77 73 2e 2e 0a

    It all goes down 4/20/09 at 16:20 local time. Tell the others!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  27. Re:Q: anonymous in an organization? by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Funny
    Depends which ones. It tailed off after a while as Anonymous got bored, to the point where only a few bothered to turn up, but the first couple of months got pretty good turnouts and reasonable amounts of press coverage. Lulz were had from Scientology representatives explaining about the terrorist organisation threatening them - scene cuts to a bunch of emo teens in Guy Fawkes masks with banners and placards mostly about cats of unusual length and Rick Astley.

    As for numbers, I doubt any individual protest ever got more than a couple of hundred at a time, but worldwide at peak it's estimated that there were over 9000 out on the streets.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  28. Social Science Research Gone Bad by HikingStick · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This report is just an example of Social Science research gone bad. Someone picked up on the fact that some individuals use "Anonymous" logons for ill, and they made a generalization that this must apply to all persons who use "Anonymous" logons. That's a cardinal sin in social science research. While a goal of such research is to make generalizations about a group, such theories must be tested before they can be asserted as even mildly authoritative. Had they simply done a little more research (or hired an outside researcher who wasn't already looking for "the devil"), they also might have learned that ordinary people will often use anonymous logons for other reasons:
    • They don't want to hassle with registering on yet another site.
    • They are using a public computer and don't want to enter their account information there.
    • They are replying to another post on a highly sensitive topic, want to speak frankly, but don't want that thread tied to their primary user identity.
    • They fat-fingered their password too many times and just don't want to bother with the reset at the time.
    • They know that others in the physical world have learned their moniker and visit the same sites, and they want to make comments that might not be well-received by their real-world counterparts.
    • They could be making political commentary and want to protect themselves from government sanction. Hey, the founding fathers did it, and it seems that we (in the United States) may have more and more reason to do that as time progresses since our government is taking on more characteristics of Big Brother lately.

    There might be dozens of other reasons why people would legitimately want to stay anonymous.

    Oh, yes, I realize I posted this one while logged in. Let them mark me an enemy of the state if they so desire.

    [I hereby raspberry those segments of United States government, or any other agencies for that matter, that conduct such shoddy research and make generalizations based on fear and incomplete information.]

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  29. Re:Level Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tell that to GameStop.

    I'm sure the mere mention of "battletoads" will immediately put you on a watch list sometime soon.

  30. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by Shark · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, they got me last year...

    --
    Mind the frickin' laser...
  31. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by FooAtWFU · · Score: 5, Funny

    Phew. For a moment I thought you were going to say "09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0". We would have been doomed.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  32. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes! We are Anonymous, we are legion, we do not...

    ...Oh bugger.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  33. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by Stephan202 · · Score: 5, Informative
    For those too lazy to make the conversion, here's Lumpy's message:

    "Only really stupid paranoids think that there is a secret society trying to get them. People in general are too lazy to act en-masse' to disrupt things if they are comfortable. If you are creating misery and death for a group, then by all means worry.\n\nBut these people are simply clutching at straws..\n"

    (Python: ''.join(map(chr, map(lambda x: int(x, 16), s.split()))))

  34. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by dimeglio · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is Coward the only member of Anonymous? That's not much of a threat.

    --
    Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
  35. Anonymous by mrsquid0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anonymous's ideology sounds intriguing. How does one go about joining them? I would like to subscribe to their newsletter.

    --
    Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
  36. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by dfdashh · · Score: 3, Informative

    Perl hint: s/([a-fA-F0-9]{2})/chr(hex $1)/eg;

    --
    df -h /my/head
  37. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by fugue · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm betting it goes something like this:

    People who blow shit up are likely to be antisocial.

    People on slashdot, 4chan, etc., are likely to be antisocial.

    Therefore people who read slashdot are likely to blow shit up.

    Can't blame them, really, given the quality of education we as a society have decided to give our citizens. Makes me so angry I want to blow some shit up. Who's with me?

    --
    "The biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has taken place."
  38. Re:They are very ignorant, and can be destructive. by superbus1929 · · Score: 4, Funny

    If it means KDawson gets locked up, then I welcome our new Governmental overlords.

    --
    Let's stop dilly-dallying and just change "-1: Overrated" to "-1: Disagree" or "-1: Doesn't Subscribe to Groupthink".