Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Mentioned In Virginia Terrorism Report

megamerican alerted us to a leaked document (PDF) from a Virginia Fusion Center titled "2009 Virginia Terrorism Threat Assessment." The document is marked as "Law Enforcement Sensitive," not to be shown to public. Citizens for Legitimate Government has a write-up. Slashdot gets a mention on page 45 — not as a terrorist organization itself, but as one of the places that members of Anonymous may hang out: "A 'loose coalition of Internet denizens,' Anonymous consists largely of users from multiple internet sites such as 4chan, 711chan, 420chan, Something Awful, Fark, Encyclopedia Dramatica, Slashdot, IRC channels, and YouTube. Other social networking sites are also utilized to mobilize physical protests. ... Anonymous is of interest not only because of the sentiments expressed by affiliates and their potential for physical protest, but because they have innovated the use of e-protests and mobilization. Given the lack of a unifying creed, this movement has the potential to inspire lone wolf behavior in the cyber realms." According to the report, cell phones and digital music players have been used to transfer plans related to criminal activity, and therefore presumably could be grounds for suspicion. Podcasting is also suspicious.

500 of 779 comments (clear)

  1. A.C. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Lone wolf" sound MUCH better than anonymous coward!

    1. Re:A.C. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Anonymous working as a group is probably the biggest joke on the media I've heard in a while. It's like saying all unsolved murder mysteries are caused by the same terrorist group (until each murder is solved!)

      They just don't understand the joke, do they?

    2. Re:A.C. by knghtrider · · Score: 1
      Especially 'Lone Wolf McQuade'..

      Chuck Norris floats like a butterfly and stings like a tomahawk missile. At mach 3. In the face..

      --
      In America today you can murder land for private profit. You can leave the corpse for all to see, and nobody calls the c
    3. Re:A.C. by Assmasher · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Genius. How great would it be if Slashdot changed 'Anonymous Coward' to Lone Wolf for a few weeks?

      --
      Loading...
    4. Re:A.C. by apostrophesemicolon · · Score: 5, Funny

      in related news,
      a coalition of persons of interest is growing at an exponential rate on the Internets. Members of the group, posting in various websites under the handle, Guest, often post provocative and sometimes unlawful comments. By using the handle name "Guest", they were afforded anonymity.

      Several related groups are Anonymous, Anonymous Coward, Public, Guest, and Unregistered.

    5. Re:A.C. by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      That's because of that third fist where his chin should be.

    6. Re:A.C. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      "Lone wolf" sound MUCH better than anonymous coward!

      I tried to register the username but it said it was too similar to a lot of names that already exist.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    7. Re:A.C. by funkyloki · · Score: 1

      Which you never see coming because of the beard.

      --
      Scientists now say the future will be far more futuristic than originally believed
    8. Re:A.C. by spirality · · Score: 1

      Similar thing happened in Missouri recently. See : http://www.unitedliberty.org/articles/ron-paul-supporters-terrorists

      The government is out of control... They should not be calling out places/groups/persons that express dissent. But this is what is happening. Hell it's been happening for decades, but that doesn't justify it... COINTELPRO?

    9. Re:A.C. by nine-times · · Score: 1

      They just don't understand the joke, do they?

      No, they don't. It's like Ted Stevens taking about the "tubes", or Oprah being very concerned about "over 9,000 penises". Lots of people, particularly those from older generations, have very little understanding of the technical and social workings of the Internet.

      It's not the worst thing-- there are plenty of technical issues and social interaction in life that I don't understand. But then, I don't try to control those things.

    10. Re:A.C. by severoon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Anonymous consists largely of users from multiple internet sites such as...

      How can any member of Anonymous be "from" a site like fark? Do they issue Anonymous press pass credentials or something?

      This gets the whole idea of Anonymous wrong. Anonymous isn't "from" anywhere. The moment you start thinking you know something about Anonymous, the moment you start trying to put Anonymous into a box, you're no longer talking about Anonymous...you're talking onymous.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    11. Re:A.C. by mea37 · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I guess Wikipedia is out of touch, too.

    12. Re:A.C. by rootofevil · · Score: 3, Informative

      i think what they are trying to imply is that the group coalesces around the named sites for communication and organization.

      also, im somewhat skeptical of them naming fark, and /.

      *chan on the other hand...

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    13. Re:A.C. by bwhaley · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes! This is a hilarious idea. How can we convince the Taco? We need to all band together. Perhaps we can submit an article to Digg about the idea and we can all Digg it :).

      --
      "I either want less corruption, or more chance
      to participate in it." -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    14. Re:A.C. by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      "Lone wolf" sound MUCH better than anonymous coward!

      Yeah, this certainly has a better ring than the counselling group for "ACA" - Anonymous Cowards Anonymous.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    15. Re:A.C. by RobBebop · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From the U.S. Constitution, Ammendment 1:

      Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble , and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

      The keyword is "peaceably", but TFS seems to imply that they are trying to prohibit people from assembling, which is unconstitutional.

      The correct response, I believe, is to arrange a "peaceful assembly" on the front door of the "Virginia Fusion Center" and generate enough publicity from the press so these clowns in Virginia can be made to understand that internet sites like Slashdot.org don't make any attempt to rally any violent political movements.

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    16. Re:A.C. by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Genius. How great would it be if Slashdot changed 'Anonymous Coward' to Lone Wolf for a few weeks?

      I would rather push for "OMG Ponies" instead, as this would certainly make the report more fun to read ;)

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    17. Re:A.C. by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Funny
      "in related news,

      a coalition of persons of interest is growing at an exponential rate on the Internets. Members of the group, posting in various websites under the handle, Guest, often post provocative and sometimes unlawful comments. By using the handle name "Guest", they were afforded anonymity."

      Not only that...but, I hear there are people who actually register accounts with FALSE or misleading information as to their true identity. Pseudonyms and the like.

      What the hell is this country coming to?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    18. Re:A.C. by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      How about "Anonymous Terrorist"? That would be a more effective way to make the point.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    19. Re:A.C. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Worst kept secret. Everyone knows you can take the output of a Slashdot article with comments where a website has been slashdotted, pipe that through a Perl script to filter for the coded messages, and print the message out backwards to be read in a mirror. :P

    20. Re:A.C. by soren202 · · Score: 1

      well I, for one, welcome our new anonymous overlords, as does Virginia, apparently.

    21. Re:A.C. by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      WTF does Obama have to do with the Virginia State Government?

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    22. Re:A.C. by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      I'am in my parents' basement, not understanding ur joke.

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    23. Re:A.C. by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      How about "Peacefully Assembling Anonymous Coward"?

    24. Re:A.C. by NoobixCube · · Score: 1

      I wonder if we could get moo- dammit 4chan! I mean I wonder if we could get CommanderTaco to do that for us :P

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    25. Re:A.C. by davolfman · · Score: 1

      Anonymous is a stand alone complex without the need for brain-altering cybernetics. People keep acting like it's some enormous organization with a hidden leadership structure. In reality it seems to be some sort of strange internet/society gestalt intelligence.

    26. Re:A.C. by unitron · · Score: 1

      Didn't you get the memo? Obama is now officially to blame for anything and everything. Just ask any Republican.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    27. Re:A.C. by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      The moment you start thinking you know something about Anonymous, the moment you start trying to put Anonymous into a box, you're no longer talking about Anonymous

      Are you sure you're not talking about the Tao?:

      The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao;
      The name that can be named is not the eternal name.
      * * *
      I do not know its name; I call it Tao.

      (from the Tao Te Ching)

    28. Re:A.C. by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      You just broke the first rule of ACA!

    29. Re:A.C. by anonymousNR · · Score: 1

      or how about Luvs2SPWG

      --
      -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle
    30. Re:A.C. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough this represents the whole danger of Anonymous. Not of course a dangerous organisation or even an actual organisation but, something that be be presented as a dangerous organisation, a illusions created to further the petty interests of incompetent political appointees.

      Think of the flip side, how exactly o you prove you are not a member of an organisation that doesn't exist when they accuses of being one. Due you attempt to refute their illogic by accurately defining the nature of 'Anonymous', they would simply take that as proof that you are indeed a member of 'Anonymous', perhaps even a 'ring leader', umm, by the demonstration of your knowledgeable understanding.

      So 'Anonymous' is the digital equivalent of the wind, it comes and goes, sometimes stronger, sometimes weaker, sometimes even a hurricane of activity, it has no centre (except of course for that hurricane simile but that comes and goes and shifts from issue to issue, disappears and reappears). So join an activity, anonymously, temporarily then for that time you also are a part of the 'Anonymous' faction that both does and doesn't exist ;).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    31. Re:A.C. by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Guess I'm not on the Republican party's spam list.

      Which I'm pretty glad for, really.

      Partisan politics just gets me pissed, regardless of who's side it is.....

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    32. Re:A.C. by zmnatz · · Score: 1

      Members of the group, posting in various websites under the handle, Guest, often post provocative and sometimes unlawful comments.

      That's hilarious. Just plain hilarious. Posts like this are why I bother reading the comments after the article.

  2. Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    All your base are belong to us.

  3. Level Up by kiehlster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looks like Anonymous has just leveled up. I wonder about a couple things. Who paid off Virginia state to label Anonymous as a terrorist organization, and how much of Anonymous will be loyal enough to stick around now that they are labeled as a terrorism threat.

    1. Re:Level Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How ignorant. A bunch of mall-goth imbeciles that happen to visit 4chan does not a terrorist organization make.

    2. Re:Level Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Xbox Live Achievement Unlocked: You are now a terrorist!

    3. Re:Level Up by Vanders · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who paid off Virginia state to label Anonymous as a terrorist organization

      Scientology. Or Habbo.com. Either could be the culprit.

      how much of Anonymous will be loyal enough to stick around

      That's such an illogical conjecture I'm not sure where to start. "Anonymous" isn't some sort of highly organised group. It's just a bunch of people on various websites. Going to those websites doesn't make you a terrorist, or a furry, or a protester, or whatever it is someone else is doing. "Stick around"? Makes no sense.

    4. Re:Level Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Anonymous is a microcosm of society. There is no formal method for joining. There are no membership lists or membership dues.

      There are people doing good things (for whatever you consider good), people doing bad things (for whatever you consider bad), people doing neutral things (for any other action), and people doing nothing.

      When someone says "Anonymous will do xyz", they're not charging everyone who associates themselves with the group to do xyz. They are simply invoking the protection of being lost in a crowd and the protection of free association.

      All things that, in and of themselves, are perfectly legal in the United States. However, what is done once under the cloak of these protections, on the other hand, may be illegal.

      Personally, Anonymous scares me a hell of a lot less than the far right militia groups (which, by the way, all do the same thing and are legal).

    5. Re:Level Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's such an illogical conjecture I'm not sure where to start. "Anonymous" isn't some sort of highly organised group. It's just a bunch of people on various websites. Going to those websites doesn't make you a terrorist, or a furry, or a protester, or whatever it is someone else is doing. "Stick around"? Makes no sense.

      That's basically what the report actually says about Anonymous. They got a mention and a small write-up in the report because a few individuals identifying with them committed minor acts of vandalism. It says that they aren't really an organized group. The main reason they're even mentioned seems to be to give an example of people coordinating protests or actions online.

      The "phones and ipod" section just gives examples of how terrorists and organized criminals were taking advantage of technology-- examples which are already pretty well-known, really.

      This isn't alarmism on the part of the Virginia government. The summary is silly.

    6. Re:Level Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Tell that to GameStop.

      I'm sure the mere mention of "battletoads" will immediately put you on a watch list sometime soon.

    7. Re:Level Up by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Church of Scientology?

      now that dissenting ANY church publicly is a "hate crime" organizing protests makes you "terrorists".

      the biggest problem with Anonymous is that they organize "flash mobs" quite effectively ... and effectively organizing large numbers of people in secret scares the HELL out of law enforcement, especially in places where they can effectively control protesters and political speech. what's really funny is that the biggest law broken by Anonymous is "protesting with out a permit" the violence and death threats have all come from the other sides (CoS,police, etc) yet it's "their" fault for protesting and brining up trouble.

    8. Re:Level Up by kiehlster · · Score: 1

      And I'll bet they are the ones who marked my comment as off-topic. Just like they ignore the fact that 'if Anonymous-then Slashdot' is not the same as 'if Slashdot-then Anonymous'. I learned the difference between one-way and two-way implications back in grade school.

    9. Re:Level Up by AdamThor · · Score: 1

      This isn't alarmism on the part of the Virginia government. The summary is silly.

      Clearly, ANONYMOUS was here! OMGWTFBBQ!

      --
      -- "Oh. This guy again."
    10. Re:Level Up by jank1887 · · Score: 1

      buzzkill.

    11. Re:Level Up by Grym · · Score: 1

      This isn't alarmism on the part of the Virginia government.

      It isn't? You don't think it is slightly odd that Anonymous is mentioned on the same list containing Hezbollah, Hamas, or Al Qaeda? Think about that: Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas, and Anonymous... hmmm...One of these things is not like the other...

      These "fusion centers" seem absolutely desperate to find threats and justify their own incompetent existence and wasted funding. Did you not find it odd that nearly every group mentioned in the report is projected to see an increase in membership, funding, or influence? Now, maybe that's true--maybe we live in extraordinary times where our enemies are rising up all around us. However, I call bullshit on their "projections and research" because the section on Anonymous is practically copied and pasted from the Wikipedia entry . They even took the picture! I think they should have just been honest and defined the "intelligence gaps" as the space between their own ears.

      This isn't the first Fusion Center document to be leaked to the public. Recently, one of Missouri's Fusion center reports was leaked, and what was inside was pretty shocking. Apparently, voting for Ron Paul was deemed a suspicious action. One of the icons of this brand of extremism was claimed to be theGadsden Flag--a Revolutionary War flag carried by colonists against the British. The ignorance is astounding.

      There is no place for these organizations in a free country. These fusion centers, along with the NSA and other domestic surveillance operations are the American equivalent of the KGB. They should be opposed and ultimately dismantled before they get out of control and become a threat themselves.

      -Grym ("lone wolf extremist")

    12. Re:Level Up by Surrounded · · Score: 1

      There are no membership lists or membership dues.

      I think you are on to something... hmm... maybe we need a foundation, possibly called United Annoymous of Social Sites or U-ASS for short with an familar fee of 14.99 per month.

    13. Re:Level Up by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      I'm looking for this game...

    14. Re:Level Up by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      Personally, Anonymous scares me a hell of a lot less than the far right militia groups

      It doesn't so much scare me as worry me. I see a lot of people getting swept up in this sort of thing, thinking they're doing "the right thing". The problem is, this is a group of, essentially, vigilantes. They decided that Scientology is bad, and they were going to do something about it. Whether or not Scientology is bad, vigilantism is worse because it relies on mob "logic" which has proven throughout history to make poor decisions. This is what brought us Lynchings, Burning Crosses, Witch Hunts, etc..

      What's worse, in my opinion, is the fact that a group of people are taking it upon themselves to judge a (theoretical) religion as "false" or evil. Whether or not you believe Scientology is a religion, many of the people who are members do in fact view it as a religion. Anonymous is effectively persecuting people based on their religion. It doesn't matter if the founders of that religion are scam artists and using people, the catholic church can be considered to be doing that.

      Anonymous does, in fact, meet the criteria of a terrorist organization. What's terrible is that it's members are otherwise intelligent people who end up doing stupid shit, and not realizing exactly what it is they're doing. Mobs are bad. All it takes is one spark to set them off. Like the DDoS attacks against Scientology that also affected thousands of other sites.

    15. Re:Level Up by kiehlster · · Score: 1

      No, it's more likely that there'd be "Moonlight Mobs". Surprised I haven't heard much of "Wiki Mobs". Now that would be scary.

    16. Re:Level Up by soren202 · · Score: 1

      if anything, this'll become a big joke on *chan and the other sites. I'm sure that, if anyone even notices, the only reaction will be laughter and mocking, as is generally the case on the internet.

    17. Re:Level Up by dogeatery · · Score: 1

      militia groups, nothin'! How about the so-called "neopatriots" planning a "revolution" on april 15?

    18. Re:Level Up by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      There are people doing good things (for whatever you consider good), people doing bad things (for whatever you consider bad), people doing neutral things (for any other action), and people doing nothing.

      Anonymous people play Dungeons and Dragons. Check! Therefore anyone playing Dungeons and Dragons *must* be a terrorist threat. Dungeon masters are really the leaders of terrorist cells.

      I knew those nerdy looking guys were up to *something*.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    19. Re:Level Up by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      on the other hand "Anonymous Coward" is a pretty prolific poster and says some scary shit! I'm sure law enforcement has freaked-the-hell-out when a group with the same name appeared on the street protesting. Ack! AC is leaving the tubes... AC is everywhere!!!!

  4. Who is this anonymous? by rimcrazy · · Score: 3, Funny

    .. and what can we do to stop him!!!

    or her

    or it

    or them

    or they

    or ... no wait. It's me AAAAAAAAAhhhhhhhhhhhh

    --
    "TV, a medium as it is neither rare nor well done." Ernie Kovacs
    1. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Andoman78 · · Score: 1

      They're a loose knit group of Scientology destroying Japanese fighting robots.

    2. Re:Who is this anonymous? by sakdoctor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let's post our real names.

      I'm David.

    3. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm David.

    4. Re:Who is this anonymous? by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nice to meet you, Dave. I'm Spartacus.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    5. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, I'M DAVID!

    6. Re:Who is this anonymous? by idontgno · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's so weird, I'm Spartacus too!

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    7. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Bigbutt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    8. Re:Who is this anonymous? by LordKaT · · Score: 1

      Shut up Sean

    9. Re:Who is this anonymous? by linhares · · Score: 1

      David here

    10. Re:Who is this anonymous? by gaderael · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm Spartacus!

      --
      Anyone got a light for my sig?
    11. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm Brian of Nazarus. ...and so's my wife.

    12. Re:Who is this anonymous? by AnalPerfume · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm Spartacus & so is my wife.

    13. Re:Who is this anonymous? by marcop · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are some who call me, "Tim".

    14. Re:Who is this anonymous? by x_IamSpartacus_x · · Score: 5, Funny

      No seriously... x_IamSpartacus_x !!!!!

    15. Re:Who is this anonymous? by spartacus_prime · · Score: 1

      Stop saying that!

      --
      If you can read this, it means that I bothered to log in.
    16. Re:Who is this anonymous? by DM+Zero · · Score: 1

      I'm Ron Burgundy.

    17. Re:Who is this anonymous? by BenFenner · · Score: 1

      I'm Ben. 100 Internets to the first person to guess my last name.

    18. Re:Who is this anonymous? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Franklin?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    19. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have a vewy gweat fwiend in Wome called 'Biggus Dickus'.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    20. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      John Jacob Jingleheimer Spartacus,
              His name is my name too.
              Whenever we go out
              The people always shout,
              "There goes John Jacob Jingleheimer Spartacus."
              Dah, dah, dah, dah, dah, dah, dah
              John Jacob Jingleheimer Spartacus,
              His name is my name too
              When ever we go out
              The people always shout
              There goes John Jacob Jingleheimer Spartacus
      (repeat ad nauseam)

    21. Re:Who is this anonymous? by ildon · · Score: 1
    22. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      INCONCEIVABLE!

    23. Re:Who is this anonymous? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Dover?

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    24. Re:Who is this anonymous? by somersault · · Score: 1

      And I'm PC!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    25. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Pervaricator+General · · Score: 1
      I am Spartacus

      Or is this Sparta?

    26. Re:Who is this anonymous? by apostrophesemicolon · · Score: 1

      The name is Bond, Sheik Yerbond Bond.

    27. Re:Who is this anonymous? by morethanapapercert · · Score: 4, Funny
      My name is Legion

      (Mark 5:9)

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    28. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Unnngh! · · Score: 3, Funny

      My name is Robert Paulson...

    29. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Deadgrass · · Score: 1

      Call me Ishmael.

    30. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      am i doing it rite?

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    31. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Kagura · · Score: 1

      There goes a manta ray!

    32. Re:Who is this anonymous? by DarrylM · · Score: 1

      Well, you could say "Dennis."

      And I'm 37; I'm not old!

    33. Re:Who is this anonymous? by yascha · · Score: 1

      Denny Crane

    34. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Chyeld · · Score: 4, Funny

      His name is Robert Paulson.

    35. Re:Who is this anonymous? by notarockstar1979 · · Score: 1

      Spartacus Spartacusson? Is that you?

    36. Re:Who is this anonymous? by pelrun · · Score: 1

      I thought you were Patrick!

    37. Re:Who is this anonymous? by jabithew · · Score: 1

      In walked a jelly fish!

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    38. Re:Who is this anonymous? by zenneth · · Score: 1

      His name was Robert Paulson.

      --
      The Chronic *WHAT* les of Narnia!
    39. Re:Who is this anonymous? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Garibaldi?

    40. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Phroggy · · Score: 1, Informative

      I cannot lie either. If you haven't heard this version, click the "Play the song" button.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    41. Re:Who is this anonymous? by papasui · · Score: 3, Funny

      So when she yells out your name in bed do you ever think she's cheating on you with herself? Also pics.

    42. Re:Who is this anonymous? by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      My name is Humpty. Pronounced with an "ump-tee".

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    43. Re:Who is this anonymous? by AnalPerfume · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually it occurs to me if she's referring to the cat, who is also called Spartacus.

    44. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Eternal+Annoyance · · Score: 1

      We're all Spartacus, except for Dave who is HAL 9000 in reality.

    45. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Niris · · Score: 1

      There goes a dog fish!

    46. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Nice to meet you, Spartacus. I'm Spartacus10000221, the 10000221st of the name.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    47. Re:Who is this anonymous? by dbc · · Score: 1

      Do you mean an African or European swallow?

    48. Re:Who is this anonymous? by baegucb · · Score: 1

      my name is baegucb. It's pronounced phonetically as "John"

    49. Re:Who is this anonymous? by mpatmcg · · Score: 1

      Dave's not here.

      --
      We will keep re-defining success until we are sucessful.
    50. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      Dover?

    51. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Quothz · · Score: 1

      Let's post our real names.

      This is my real name, you insensitive clod!

    52. Re:Who is this anonymous? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Harold, by thy name.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    53. Re:Who is this anonymous? by paul.opensource · · Score: 1

      My name is leeeeeegions for we are maaaaaaany....

    54. Re:Who is this anonymous? by TuaAmin13 · · Score: 1

      Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.

    55. Re:Who is this anonymous? by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      or ... no wait. It's me AAAAAAAAAhhhhhhhhhhhh

      Um...doesn't the fact that you posted with a registered account instead of AC kind of mean that it's definitely not the quoted possibility?

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    56. Re:Who is this anonymous? by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      I'm blue da ba dee da ba die...

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    57. Re:Who is this anonymous? by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      Offer me money.

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    58. Re:Who is this anonymous? by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      If it's "Fenner", then I win.

      If it's "Ten", then you are part of the Rebel Alliance and a traitor.

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    59. Re:Who is this anonymous? by pongo000 · · Score: 1

      They call me Mister Tibbs.

    60. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Liath · · Score: 1

      His name is Robert Paulson.

    61. Re:Who is this anonymous? by street_astrologist · · Score: 1

      His name is Robert Paulsen.

    62. Re:Who is this anonymous? by samriel · · Score: 1

      I am Spartacus

      Or is this Sparta?

      THIS

      IS

      SPARTACUS!!!

    63. Re:Who is this anonymous? by samriel · · Score: 1
    64. Re:Who is this anonymous? by SPARTlCUS · · Score: 1

      NO I AM SPARTICUS!

      Whoops! Wrong spelling...

    65. Re:Who is this anonymous? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      ur all freaks thats what u r

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    66. Re:Who is this anonymous? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      That's actually:

      "Goo-goo-g'jube"

      Not that it makes much difference, as it's drug-induced, either way.....

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    67. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      Hi, David. I'm James.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    68. Re:Who is this anonymous? by Siridar · · Score: 1

      Well...cats DO have rough tongues...

    69. Re:Who is this anonymous? by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1
  5. Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm Anonymous.

    1. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, *I* am Anonymous!!

    2. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I am David

    3. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Like my intelligence coach always said, there is no 'i' in 'Anonymous.'

      Slashdot should change "Anonymous Coward" to "Anonymous Terrorist" and claim anyone posting as such is enough for an admission of guilt ... just to screw with these reports.

    4. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, not me.. I'm spartacus.

    5. Re:Me too by Archimonde · · Score: 1

      No! I'm anonymous!

      --
      Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
    6. Re:Me too by hbr · · Score: 1

      I'm Anonymous, and so is my Dad.

    7. Re:Me too by Archimonde · · Score: 1

      Oh, wait... D'oh!

      --
      Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
    8. Re:Me too by snspdaarf · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm Batma... uh...Anonymous!
      Oh, hell....

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    9. Re:Me too by HangingChad · · Score: 1

      I'm Batman!

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    10. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Will the real Anonymous please stand up?

    11. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dave? Dave's not here.

    12. Re:Me too by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      THIS IS AN ANONYMOUS CITY-STATE!!!

      (darn /. filters taking wind out of jokes)

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    13. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No. You're just cus.

      Because I am SPARTAAA!

    14. Re:Me too by Hurricane78 · · Score: 5, Funny

      (nothing happens)

      Mr. Anonymous has learned the first lesson of not being seen: Not to stand up.

      Unfortunately, Mr. Anonymous chose a very obvious target.

      *BOOO...Euuuuuuaaahhhh...OOOM*

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    15. Re:Me too by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Coach: "Sit down!"

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    16. Re:Me too by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Sincerely yours, Anne

      oh my god it's a fed! HEY GUYS! THERE'S A FED HERE!

      FTFY

    17. Re:Me too by SlashReality · · Score: 1

      His name is Robert Paulson

      --
      "/"Reality
    18. Re:Me too by spitek · · Score: 1

      I'm David #2

    19. Re:Me too by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Voila! In view humble vaudevillian veteran, cast vicariously as both victim and villain by the vicissitudes of fate. This visage, no mere veneer of vanity, is a vestige of the "vox populi" now vacant, vanished. However, this valorous visitation of a bygone vexation stands vivified, and has vowed to vanquish these venal and virulent vermin, van guarding vice and vouchsafing the violently vicious and voracious violation of volition.
      The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta, held as a votive not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous.
      Verily this vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose, so let me simply add that it's my very good honour to meet you and you may call me V.

      --
      In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
    20. Re:Me too by Shard.Oglass666 · · Score: 1

      I'm Mickey Mouse!

    21. Re:Me too by kingturkey · · Score: 1

      David Davidson here.

    22. Re:Me too by kingturkey · · Score: 1

      Shit forgot to post anonymously, woops.

    23. Re:Me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Bam! To behold, a public bulletin board, built of both brilliance and barbarity by bastards with boners. This bastion, no mere bulwark of boredom, is a brutal barrage of blistering bullshit, barely benevolent... but behind the bigotry and boobs, beyond the bitter broadcasts of bragging buffoons: Here be the body politic. A brotherhood of blasphemy, blessed with more balls than brains, battling the bland, the bogus, the benign. bedlam? Bring it on. But i babble... better to be brief. You may call me /b/.

    24. Re:Me too by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      No, you're all individuals!

  6. Is Slashdot a Terrorist Organization Or Not by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

    Points in favor
    * It hijacks internet bandwidth that could be used more productively
    * It performs DDOS attacks on an hourly basis.
    * Millions of hours diverted from productive programming to non-productive uses
    * CSS that makes site look like someone vomited on your monitor.
    * The Idle section

    Points against
    * Millions of anti-social, hormone filled misfits are kept off the streets where they could do real harm.

    We report the facts. YOU decide.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Is Slashdot a Terrorist Organization Or Not by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't forget:

      * Promotes non-mainstream, rabid devotion to fanatical religions--including Linux and OSS.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Is Slashdot a Terrorist Organization Or Not by Caboosian · · Score: 1

      * The Idle section

      Nuke it from orbit, its the only way to be safe!

    3. Re:Is Slashdot a Terrorist Organization Or Not by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Is slashdot linkable to acts or threats of violence designed to inculcate fear among the populace in order to forment social or governmental changes to meet the social, religious, or political goals of slashdot?

      If not, and I feel safe in saying NOT, then slashdot and most if not all those sites do not belong in this report.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    4. Re:Is Slashdot a Terrorist Organization Or Not by Plunky · · Score: 1

      * Promotes non-mainstream, rabid devotion to fanatical religions--including Linux and OSS.

      Sorry, but is that for or against?

    5. Re:Is Slashdot a Terrorist Organization Or Not by bughunter · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the other threat to government and industry information policy: The EFF.

      (On that note: please donate to the EFF.)

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    6. Re:Is Slashdot a Terrorist Organization Or Not by SlipperHat · · Score: 1

      * Millions of anti-social, hormone filled misfits are kept off the streets where they could do real harm as well as procreate.

      Fixed that for you.

    7. Re:Is Slashdot a Terrorist Organization Or Not by budgenator · · Score: 1

      There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels. ...

      Warning: taking the Church of Emacs (or any church) too seriously may be hazardous to your health.

      Saint IGNUcius, the Church of Emacs

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    8. Re:Is Slashdot a Terrorist Organization Or Not by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      But is that a "Point for" of a "Point against"?

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    9. Re:Is Slashdot a Terrorist Organization Or Not by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      * Promotes non-mainstream, rabid devotion to fanatical religions--including Linux

      Oh no, Slashdot makes the Linux Zealots come out. Quick, if we zergling rush /., we can take out the pylon that powers their default gateway!

  7. oh yeah, beware the slashdot terrorist by wakim1618 · · Score: 1

    People who wear glasses are terrorists.

    People who read are terrorists.

    People who have independent thoughts are terrorists.

    Well that means that the anti-terrorist good guys are illtrate ... well my money is on the guys that wear glasses.

    1. Re:oh yeah, beware the slashdot terrorist by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Or they are stupid and cant set up their own freenet.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    2. Re:oh yeah, beware the slashdot terrorist by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know there is one down side to the internet.
      On the internet no matter how totally whacked out your idea maybe odds are you will find at least 100 people that will agree with you.
      Once you find people that agree with you all of a sudden you can believe that your idea has merit.

      Some where their is a discussion board about how it is to have orgies dressed up as giant stuffed animals. And the people on it will be convinced that they are perfectly normal people.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:oh yeah, beware the slashdot terrorist by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

      I find your ideas intriguing and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

    4. Re:oh yeah, beware the slashdot terrorist by SalaSSin · · Score: 1

      Where's that site???

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice - Grey's Law
    5. Re:oh yeah, beware the slashdot terrorist by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      I thought the down side to the internet was Rule 34. Or, is it the other way 'round?

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    6. Re:oh yeah, beware the slashdot terrorist by linhares · · Score: 1
    7. Re:oh yeah, beware the slashdot terrorist by xmundt · · Score: 1

      Greetings and Salutations...
                As Adam Corolla used to say on Love Line - "perfectly natural, perfectly normal"...

      http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/Furry

      regards
      dave

      By the by...the government SHOULD fear "anonymous" more than anything, because that is tht group of people who are MOST likely to expose its failures, evil-doing, and, general incompetence. However, to include that group in a list of terrorists and enemies of the state is another step on the slippery slope to totalitarianism.

      --
      YAB - http://blog.beemandave.com/
    8. Re:oh yeah, beware the slashdot terrorist by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      Why the hell is this modded flamebait? It's true. The Internet acts as a support group for weirdos and conspiracy theorists. I realize that can be a good thing as well (like if you're the only gay person in a small town). But for the most part, it's linking together socially retarded adults and delusional children who believe that Dragonball Z is real. I'm not dissing the Internet, I mean, total respect to it, but that's one part of it. You can't deny it, no matter how you try.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    9. Re:oh yeah, beware the slashdot terrorist by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      While may statement is true I really did mean the post to be more of a joke than anything. After all the best jokes are based on true observations. In the movie Oh God there was a great question to God and his answer.
      "Why is there evil in the world?"
      "Because I never figured out how to make something with only one side."
      But yes the internet is a support group for whack attacks.
      I also fear that it really helps to breed intolerance and polarization. Take a look at the posts here some time. Very few people seem to have the ability to politely disagree anymore.
      Hey I am on the internet and Slashdot so of course I don't think it is all bad.
      Oh and BTW there really are people that do dress up as stuffed animals and have sex parties. And yes they do think they are normal. And yes they are as normal as the German Democratic Republic was a Democratic Republic.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    10. Re:oh yeah, beware the slashdot terrorist by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Funny so far what I have seen is that they torment a kid that is trying to get other kids not to use foul language and some poor grandmother with mixed race grandkids.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    11. Re:oh yeah, beware the slashdot terrorist by u38cg · · Score: 1
      furry.wikia.com

      Well, you *did* ask.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  8. of course! by Lord+Ender · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is well known that Commander Taco is actually a commander in the Judean Peoples' Front terrorist organization. Titles like "Cmdr" just aren't given out to anyone. He's their #2 man.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:of course! by spydum · · Score: 5, Funny

      Judean People's Front can suck it! People's Front of Judea 4 LIFE!

    2. Re:of course! by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Funny

      Judean People's Front?

      Splitter

      --
      An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    3. Re:of course! by viridari · · Score: 1

      And Natalie Portman is commander of the Peoples' Front of Judea.

    4. Re:of course! by jameseyjamesey · · Score: 1

      no, the People's Front of Judea!

    5. Re:of course! by Duradin · · Score: 1

      Splitters!

    6. Re:of course! by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      Oh yea? How much do you *really* hate the Romans.

      '...a lot.'

      Oh, ok, you're in.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    7. Re:of course! by Kagura · · Score: 1

      ...I wonta 'ave a baby.
      .
      .
      .
      And from now on, I want you to call me 'Loretta'.

      .

    8. Re:of course! by FishAdmin · · Score: 1

      WHO DOES #2 WORK FOR?!!!

      --
      Last night I played a blank tape at full volume. The mime next door went nuts.
    9. Re:of course! by uberjoe · · Score: 1

      Dont forget the Popular Peoples Front. Bunch of splitters!

      --

      The days of the digital watch are numbered.

    10. Re:of course! by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      You are Number Six.

    11. Re:of course! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Austin Powers in a Monty Python thread?

      FAIL.

    12. Re:of course! by Tirhakah · · Score: 1

      Where's it gonna gestate? In a box !?

    13. Re:of course! by oracle128 · · Score: 1

      But, who does Number Two work for?

    14. Re:of course! by o'reor · · Score: 1

      Romani, ite domo !

      --
      In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
  9. Anonymous terrorists? by b0ttle · · Score: 1

    Oh no, let's declare war on the internets, I head there's some oil there too

    1. Re:Anonymous terrorists? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Snakeoil, mostly.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Anonymous terrorists? by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      Snakeoil, mostly.

      Which sells for more than crude oil without having to produce any actual product. Drill the internet!

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  10. Sic Semper Tyrannis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Remember, Virginia, that you yourself may be the Tyrant. Americans today pay far more in taxes than they did under George III - and get very little in return.

    Signed,
    "Moved with my feet"

  11. Q: anonymous in an organization? by hal9000(jr) · · Score: 1

    Are they talking about anonymity in general or a group that called Anonymous? Confused.

    1. Re:Q: anonymous in an organization? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I think they're talking about that "Anonymous Coward" guy that posts here a lot. I hate that guy.

    2. Re:Q: anonymous in an organization? by FroBugg · · Score: 4, Informative

      They're talking about the group Anonymous, mostly from 4chan. They were responsible for some reasonably large and well-organized protests against Scientology not too long ago. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_(group)

    3. Re:Q: anonymous in an organization? by abigsmurf · · Score: 1

      Well organised? Are these the same protests of 100 people that lasted about an hour and barely got any press coverage that I saw?

    4. Re:Q: anonymous in an organization? by aetherworld · · Score: 1

      Coincidentally, members on other websites who wish to remain anonymous are also given the nickname "Anonymous". I'm convinced that has nothing to do with the fact that they wish to stay anonymous but rather that they, too, must be members of a secret and dangerous group called "Anonymous"!

      /sarcasm

    5. Re:Q: anonymous in an organization? by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Funny
      Depends which ones. It tailed off after a while as Anonymous got bored, to the point where only a few bothered to turn up, but the first couple of months got pretty good turnouts and reasonable amounts of press coverage. Lulz were had from Scientology representatives explaining about the terrorist organisation threatening them - scene cuts to a bunch of emo teens in Guy Fawkes masks with banners and placards mostly about cats of unusual length and Rick Astley.

      As for numbers, I doubt any individual protest ever got more than a couple of hundred at a time, but worldwide at peak it's estimated that there were over 9000 out on the streets.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    6. Re:Q: anonymous in an organization? by kv9 · · Score: 1

      ...banners and placards mostly about cats of unusual length and Rick Astley.

      cat of unusual length is unusually lengthy

    7. Re:Q: anonymous in an organization? by discord5 · · Score: 1

      Lulz

      Guy Fawkes masks

      cats of unusual length

      Rick Astley

      over 9000

      You know, at some point in time I wrote a tfidf weighted naive bayesian classifier for classifying documents into categories in python. Simply to amuse myself I fed it tons of RSS feeds (including those from 4chan). For some reason I think that this post would automatically be classified in the same category as the 4chan rss feeds.

      I think I've got to contact these fools in Virginia to tell them I have a tool that will automatically recognize anonymous on the internet. If the report concludes that they're terrorists, they might be dumb enough to buy my python scripts.

    8. Re:Q: anonymous in an organization? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I find it funny how TFA quotes Wikipedia almost verbatim.

      From Wikipedia: "A "loose coalition of Internet denizens", the group is banded together by the internet, through sites such as 4chan, 711chan, 420chan, Something Awful, Fark, Encyclopedia Dramatica, Slashdot, IRC channels, and YouTube."

  12. Terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since when were protests "terrorism"?

    1. Re:Terrorism by Cornwallis · · Score: 5, Informative

      from the site: Seven Signs of Terrorism Certain activities, especially those at or near sensitive facilities, including government, military or other high profile sites or places where large numbers of people congregate, may indicate terrorist planning phases. Suspicious activities of interest that should be reported to law enforcement are commonly referred to as the 7 Signs of Terrorism. Surveillance: Recording or monitoring activities. May include drawing diagrams, note taking, use of cameras, binoculars or other vision-enhancing devices or possessing floor plans or blueprints of key facilities. Elicitation: Attempts to obtain operation, security and personnel-related information regarding a key facility. May be made by mail, fax, e-mail, telephone or in person. Tests of Security: Attempts to measure reaction times to security breaches or to penetrate physical security barriers or procedures in order to assess strengths and weaknesses. Acquiring Supplies: Attempts to improperly acquire items that could be used in a terrorist act. May include the acquisition of explosives, weapons, harmful chemicals, flight manuals, law enforcement or military equipment, uniforms, identification badges or the equipment to manufacture false identification. Suspicious Persons: Someone who does not appear to belong in a workplace, neighborhood or business establishment due to their behavior, including unusual questions or statements they make. Dry Runs/Trial Runs: Behavior that appears to be preparation for a terrorist act without actually committing the act. Activity could include mapping out routes and determining the timing of traffic lights and flow. Deploying Assets: Placing people, equipment and supplies into position to commit the act. This is the last opportunity to alert authorities before the terrorist act occurs.

    2. Re:Terrorism by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Damn. Sounds like Wednesday night's Shadowrun game.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    3. Re:Terrorism by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

      Seven Signs of Terrorism

      Certain activities, especially those at or near sensitive facilities, including government, military or other high profile sites or places where large numbers of people congregate, may indicate terrorist planning phases. Suspicious activities of interest that should be reported to law enforcement are commonly referred to as the 7 Signs of Terrorism.

      Surveillance: Recording or monitoring activities. May include drawing diagrams, note taking, use of cameras, binoculars or other vision-enhancing devices or possessing floor plans or blueprints of key facilities.

      Acquiring Supplies: Attempts to improperly acquire items that could be used in a terrorist act. May include the acquisition of explosives, weapons, harmful chemicals, flight manuals, law enforcement or military equipment, uniforms, identification badges or the equipment to manufacture false identification.

      Suspicious Persons: Someone who does not appear to belong in a workplace, neighborhood or business establishment due to their behavior, including unusual questions or statements they make.

      Dry Runs/Trial Runs: Behavior that appears to be preparation for a terrorist act without actually committing the act. Activity could include mapping out routes and determining the timing of traffic lights and flow.

      They just described life on a typical college campus.

      ALL YOU UNDERGRADS ARE TERRORISTS!

    4. Re:Terrorism by bencoder · · Score: 1

      Our new formula is scientifically proven* to combat the 7 signs of terrorism.

      Using our patented Neutrokillusall formula you can be guaranteed to reduce the 7 signs, maintaining a fresh, healthy population.


      *In warzone studies, 8 out of 10 governments noticed a significant reduction in the 7 signs of terrorism

    5. Re:Terrorism by kiwimate · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Dry Runs/Trial Runs: Behavior that appears to be preparation for a terrorist act without actually committing the act. Activity could include mapping out routes and determining the timing of traffic lights and flow.

      Dammit. A group of us did this in Auckland city one Friday night when I was a bit younger and we were bored. Any casual observer would've seen a group of six or seven of us carefully timing the traffic lights at the bottom of Queen Street for, oh, 20 or 30 minutes.

      After we'd figured out the timing perfectly, we executed our nefarious plot. As soon as the lights turned red, we rushed into the middle of the intersection with a small couch, a couple of chairs, and a lamp, set up a mock living room, quickly took some photographs, and rushed back to safety just as the lights turned green.

      And we thought we were just having some innocent fun on a Friday night!

    6. Re:Terrorism by idontgno · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, we all know that counterculture role-playing games are just training grounds for crime. The obvious solution is raids on all their "publishers" (as the terror cells call themselves) and arrests of all their active trainees.

      Please stand by. Agents of the DHS will be there shortly.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    7. Re:Terrorism by aetherworld · · Score: 1

      Since when were protests "terrorism"?

      Since the day when being "tortured" requires you to suffer from organ failure or death.

    8. Re:Terrorism by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like the "Seven Signs of another 'Ocean's Eleven' sequel" to me....

    9. Re:Terrorism by kent_eh · · Score: 1
      Signs you might be a model railroader

      Surveillance: Recording or monitoring activities. May include drawing diagrams, note taking, use of cameras, binoculars or other vision-enhancing devices or possessing floor plans or blueprints of railroad facilities.

      Elicitation: Attempts to obtain operation, security and personnel-related information regarding a railroad facility. May be made by mail, fax, e-mail, telephone or in person.

      Tests of Security: Attempts to measure locomotives or other equipment before some rent-a-cop shows up to push his considerable weight around

      Acquiring Supplies: Attempts to improperly acquire items . May include the acquisition of rocks, old track spikes, equipment manuals, track plans or train schedules.

      Suspicious Persons: Someone who does not appear to belong in a workplace, neighborhood or business establishment due to their behavior, including questions they ask.

      Dry Runs/Trial Runs: Behavior that appears to be preparation for train watching. Activity could include mapping out routes and determining the timing of traffic lights and flow.

      Deploying Assets: Gathering lumber, assorted metal and plastic items, along with powders (such as plaster)and chemicals (such as glues ans solvents, casting resin). This is the last opportunity to alert authorities before the modelling act act occurs.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    10. Re:Terrorism by Zelig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Since they demonstrate the tactical capacity to put a bunch of people in a place, at a time, without law enforcement getting a sniff of it beforehand.

      Don't think of it as terrorism per se: think of it as a people-organizing toolset, and it ought to terrify any police state who's paying attention. To the extent the US behaves like a police state, this is a threat.

      Take a look at Improv Everywhere's Cell Phone Symphony. Heck, much of what IE does is militarily relevant. It says, "We're a bunch of peaceful clowns. But if we'd wanted to get you, you'd have been got". It says "Your security theater is irrelevant".

    11. Re:Terrorism by gebbeth · · Score: 1
      These aren't necessarily limited to "terrorism". It seems that these signs could be used in preparing for any number of crimes and perhaps even some legitimate activities (if you were a private investigator for example, there may be others...).

      Why is it that nowadays any significantly high profile criminal activity has been reclassified as terrorism? I thought that terrorist acts were supposed to invoke terror in the pursuit of some political end by blowing up/killing buildings/planes/hostages, the idea being that a population would be in so much fear (terror) that they would pressure their government to give in to the demands of the terrorists.

      The answer is that there are probably too few of the above classification of terrorists to actually have a war against (as in the war on terror) here in the United States. Those in control need to expand the definition of terror so as to actually have something to have war against. Why have a war on terror at all? Many people are willing to cede their liberty and freedom to catch terrorists of the ilk that perpetrated 9/11 (a la the war on terror) and the government is using that sentiment with regards to the newly reclassified definition of terrorist (pretty much anyone they don't like that they are willing to label as terrorist...protesters, constitutionalists, libertarians etc etc etc. See Missouri's MIAC report which associated supporters of Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr, three presidential candidates all espousing constitutional government)being associated with terrorists. The Bush administration (and now Obama administration) has taken full advantage of the flexibility of the term "terrorist" to assault personal freedoms on an unprecedented scale.

      If you see the scales of freedom tipping in the wrong direction, get involved. There are left and right leaning organizations that are trying to restore our freedom:
      American Freedom Campaign
      The Pen
      DownsizeDc.org
      The Campaign for Liberty
      Restore the Republic
      Young Americans for Liberty

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
    12. Re:Terrorism by Kindaian · · Score: 1

      Not one of those activities are illegal in US! ;)

    13. Re:Terrorism by Kindaian · · Score: 1

      And most of them constitue a reputable profession called... Journalism.

    14. Re:Terrorism by Quothz · · Score: 1

      Someone who does not appear to belong in a ...neighborhood ... due to their behavior, including unusual questions or statements they make.

      Men, take notice! New reason not to ask for directions: "But if we pull over and ask, we could be reported as terrorists, honey."

    15. Re:Terrorism by Niris · · Score: 1

      Reputable? Psht. :p

    16. Re:Terrorism by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      And we thought we were just having some innocent fun on a Friday night!

      That's what you say, but this was clearly a dry-run for your plan to move your living room into the intersection permanently. You must be stopped!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    17. Re:Terrorism by alexo · · Score: 1

      terrorism [ter-uh-riz-uhm]
      -noun
      1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes.
      2. the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism or terrorization.
      3. a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.
      4. any activity that the current administration disapproves of.

      terrorist[ter-er-ist]
      -noun
      1. a person, usually a member of a group, who uses or advocates terrorism.
      2. a person who terrorizes or frightens others.
      3. (formerly) a member of a political group in Russia aiming at the demoralization of the government by terror.
      4. an agent or partisan of the revolutionary tribunal during the Reign of Terror in France.
      5. any individual that the current administration disapproves of.

    18. Re:Terrorism by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      "Activity could include mapping out routes"
      better not tell em about openstreetmap.org then

    19. Re:Terrorism by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

      OMG. They have a whole office - or cell? - of people locally who match that description - they even boast of their "agents".

      Do you suppose "Humans Enraged at Reality" is what the "HER" stands for in HER Realty?

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
  13. Only terrorists use anonymous posts by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    So anywhere you can be anonymous must be stamped out. in the name of fighting terrorism.

    Open wifi, not keeping weblogs, ISPs not keeping logs forever... you get the idea.

    Need a national registrar of mac addresses ( ok, i know they can be spoofed, but has reality ever got in the way before? )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Only terrorists use anonymous posts by Zumbs · · Score: 1

      What if anonymous hid by taking on a user name? So, in fact, everyone posting are terrorists! Let us all join (vitual) hands, and sing as we walk to the local police station and turn ourselves in for Un-American Activities!

      Dam-damm dam-dam ... from sea to shining sea ...

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    2. Re:Only terrorists use anonymous posts by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Actually, that idea of hiding behind a fake name needing to be prevented has already been floated.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:Only terrorists use anonymous posts by linhares · · Score: 1

      What a stupid idea. --Tyler Durden

  14. Ha! by mccalli · · Score: 5, Funny

    ""A 'loose coalition of Internet denizens,' Anonymous consists largely of users from multiple internet sites such as 4chan, 711chan, 420chan, Something Awful, Fark, Encyclopedia Dramatica, Slashdot, IRC channels, and YouTube. "

    In your face, Digg! Yeah!

    1. Re:Ha! by rarity · · Score: 1

      Where is this "IRC Channels" website? I wish to join.

    2. Re:Ha! by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      ""A 'loose coalition of Internet denizens,' Anonymous consists largely of users from multiple internet sites such as 4chan, 711chan, 420chan, Something Awful, Fark, Encyclopedia Dramatica, Slashdot, IRC channels, and YouTube. "

      In your face, Digg! Yeah!

      Never mind Digg, the list's missing an important entry here. Anyone who's ever been raided knows perfectly well that Anonymous come from ebaumsworld.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:Ha! by Loadmaster · · Score: 1

      Easy, go to the Usenet website, take a left, go about 10-30 feet. Stop, talking to Joe my old plumber. He's not my plumber anymore. I don't know what he does now. Probably retired. Anyway, he'll give you directions to his brother, Jeff, who will give you the URL to the IRC website. Don't go directly to it. Instead, head over to your local Gopher hole. Ok, that's enough.

  15. That silly Constitution by WCMI92 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How DARE citizens engage in the rights to:

    Free speech
    Assembly
    Petition the government (or government institutions).

    Why those subversives who not only wrote it into law, but preceded those rights with the words "Congress shall make no law abridging..." must have been terrorists or something.

    No wonder this was marked "not to show to public". How dare we engage in such subversion of the LAW enforcement establishment.

    The way I read this is that they are setting up pretexts for "probable cause" to detain and search people who engage in normal, legal behavior. Yet more evidence that the "war on terror" and the PATRIOT act are being used to expand law enforcement power over the law abiding, when instead such energy would be better spent guarding the porous borders or monitoring the FOREIGN FUNDED (Saudi) mosques (which is where most world wide terrorism originates).

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
    1. Re:That silly Constitution by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Please come with us, we need to talk.

      ( joking aside, i agree and its damned scary )

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    2. Re:That silly Constitution by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Free speech
      Assembly
      Petition the government (or government institutions).
      ...
      No wonder this was marked "not to show to public". How dare we engage in such subversion of the LAW enforcement establishment.

      Generally speaking, those three things are not directly equivalent to "subversion of the LAW enforcement establishment".

      This is more generally indicative of a new age of governmental and police paranoia where anywhere and everything is a potential place or tool for Bad Things(TM). And they're right. They just haven't figured out how to accurately assess the risk levels yet.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:That silly Constitution by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Why those subversives who not only wrote it into law, but preceded those rights with the words "Congress shall make no law abridging..." must have been terrorists or something.

      What is the difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter besides the outcome of the war?

      I mean, in the current definition, not the one found in encyclopedias.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:That silly Constitution by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      when instead such energy would be better spent guarding the porous borders or monitoring the FOREIGN FUNDED (Saudi) mosques (which is where most world wide terrorism originates).

      [citation needed]

      Perhaps you're unaware of the terrorism that occurs in central Africa on a daily basis, that is conveniently ignored? Or does that not count because it doesn't greatly affect American economic interests?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    5. Re:That silly Constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know which is scarier, the fact that there should be people actively employed in writing this kind of nonsense, or the fact that they are so hideously misinformed?

      The fact that they put "anarchist extremists" such as, erm, Slashdot people, right up there with groups who have actually, erm, killed people, tells me that they're worried about what kind of authority-subversion is going to come out of the Series of Tubes next.

    6. Re:That silly Constitution by Gutboy · · Score: 1

      A terrorist attacks civilian targets. Freedom fighters attack military targets. There is a big difference.

    7. Re:That silly Constitution by JGalt2009 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Shhh! Don't wake the American people! They have slept through the making PERMANENT of the PATRIOT ACT and the declaration of the Supreme Court that the government can take your land and give it to a developer to build a shopping mall. So what is it that makes you think the American people care one whit about freedom?

    8. Re:That silly Constitution by Raenex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A terrorist attacks civilian targets. Freedom fighters attack military targets. There is a big difference.

      You can be a freedom fighter and a terrorist. When will American history books call the people behind the Boston Tea Party terrorists? There's also the matter of a couple of nuclear bombs on Japan, and the fire bombing of Dresden.

    9. Re:That silly Constitution by Shark · · Score: 1

      The only way to make sense of this mess is to view it from a different angle.

      Try to trade 'war on terror' for 'war on individual liberty'. It'll make a heck of a lot more sense then.

      I'm so glad Obama is here to put an end to all this nonsense like domestic spying and the Patriot Act and the war in Iraq. Of course the troops have to make a little detour through Afghanistan and maybe a bit in Pakistan first, but they're coming home right away, just as promised.

      --
      Mind the frickin' laser...
    10. Re:That silly Constitution by rthille · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not all that up on the history of the Boston tea party, but I don't think it was intended to terrorize anyone. Sure, the people guarding the tea on the boats might have had violence committed against them, but the goal wasn't terrorism.

      The other two, yeah, they were designed to produce terror in the populace and get them to work to change their government's stance.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    11. Re:That silly Constitution by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Oooh, clever troll. Wait, let me turn on the applause light for you.

    12. Re:That silly Constitution by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      Or Gen. Sherman in the Civil War, who pioneered the concept of "total war" by destroying the South's economy and burning as he went.

      In my home county of Loudoun, one would be hard pressed not to draw some comparisons between the Loudoun Rangers (Union) and Mosby's Rangers (Confederate) and terrorism. I'm not saying they're equivalent, but there was a lot of indiscriminate burning of the houses and barns of the other side's supporters (or the Quakers, who got hit by both sides for being neutral).

    13. Re:That silly Constitution by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      That's really all Anonymous is about; protecting their rights to FAP. I know I would never give up my right to FAP, the government would have to take it over my cold, dead body!

      Everyone! Rise up and protect your right to FAP!

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    14. Re:That silly Constitution by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I think his point was that Gutboy's method of differentiating was slightly fatu... insufficient.

    15. Re:That silly Constitution by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I'm not all that up on the history of the Boston tea party, but I don't think it was intended to terrorize anyone.

      Ok, I'll grant that "terrorist" isn't a very good label, though I'll note that the tea certainly wasn't a military target. Also, property damage is always a violent act, even if nobody gets hurt. Finally, the government likes to throw around the word terrorists for exactly the kinds of acts like the Boston Tea Party:

      When protesters become 'terrorists'

    16. Re:That silly Constitution by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I think you can come up with better examples than that.

      The Boston Tea Party was destruction of property, not terrorism. If there were any casualties, they were collateral to the act, not the aim.

      I could possibly buy the Dresden fire bombing, although I regard that as debatable, given the circumstances of WWII.

      The use of nuclear bombs on Japan as terrorism, however, is extremely debatable, given the intransigence of the Japanese in coming to terms when it was clear that they were defeated. The defiance of an attacker who has clearly won invites pillage and massacre. That is one of the older and more clearly understood rules of war, and its aim, paradoxically, is to save lives on both sides by a recognition of the inevitable.

      If the opposing army refuses to surrender in that circumstance, then all they are hoping to do is kill as many of you as possible before every person in their country dies first. I see no reason why a loser, and an aggressor at that, has a right to expect that we will feed our troops into a meat grinder when there are other options we can use. That civilian lives were lost was extremely regrettable, but if Japan itself had been invaded, I can't imagine that there would have been any fewer civilian casualties at all.

    17. Re:That silly Constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You seem to have forgotten the Rape of Nanking, the Bataan Death March, the attacks on Russia, the concentration camps, and the continuous indiscriminate shelling of London (which went on for YEARS).

      Japan and Germany deserved everything that happened as a result of their viciousness. They worked really hard to earn those counterattacks, and it would have been selfish of us not to supply them. We are nothing if not generous...

    18. Re:That silly Constitution by rthille · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, I'm certain the Crown felt they were 'terrorists', or they would have if they were like our recent govt. But I still think it's a stretch for historians to claim so :-)

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    19. Re:That silly Constitution by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      To be fair, 'terrorist' is used for lots of things it shouldn't - people who set up roadside bombs in Iraq are labeled insurgent and terrorist, when they're attacking military targets and already live there. FARC are labeled as terrorist when they're actually revolutionaries. Seems that terrorist just means 'someone we don't like'.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    20. Re:That silly Constitution by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      "Well, if firefighters fight fires, and crime fighters fight crime, what do freedom fighters fight?"

      -George Carlin

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    21. Re:That silly Constitution by idontgno · · Score: 1

      obHistoryPedantry: the safest thing one might say is that Sherman didn't so much pioneer it as perfect its practice on the North American continent. He wasn't even the first in the U. S. Civil War, really; Sheridan gave the Shenandoah Valley a taste of scorched earth a few months earlier, destroying the economy, foodstocks, and anything that might give the Confederate military logistical or moral support.

      Particularly, don't forget the ancient practice of salting the soil of a conquered enemy.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    22. Re:That silly Constitution by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      That's a fair correction. Thank you.

    23. Re:That silly Constitution by unitron · · Score: 1

      Or Gen. Sherman in the Civil War, who pioneered the concept of "total war" by destroying the South's economy and burning as he went.

      "Carthago delenda est"

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    24. Re:That silly Constitution by insllvn · · Score: 1

      Cunning linguistics? Isn't that sort of thing illegal under Sha'ria law?

  16. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Government ( followed by religion ) is the biggest terrorist organisation EVER !

  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. Kind of funny by anarkavre · · Score: 1

    Wasn't the United States kind of founded by terrorism? Stealing other peoples land and making them promises and then later screwing them over. I remember the Anonymous protest against Scientology in Pittsburgh and as far as I can tell it involved no violence.

    --
    "Without curiosity and knowledge, the mind is a vast void. Without the mind, curiosity and knowledge are nonexistent."
    1. Re:Kind of funny by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Ethnic cleansing" would be a better description of what the founding of America was based on.

      Terrorism is something else and a term that gets abused to the point of making it meaningless.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Kind of funny by anarkavre · · Score: 1

      You are right there. If you don't match the Western way then GTFO.

      --
      "Without curiosity and knowledge, the mind is a vast void. Without the mind, curiosity and knowledge are nonexistent."
    3. Re:Kind of funny by eltaco · · Score: 1

      agreed. terrorism is the act of spreading fear and intimidation. unfortunately, nowadays this word is being used for anything the gov't doesn't like.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism

      --
      It's not about fate, it's about character.
      there be no shelter here, the frontline is everywhere!
    4. Re:Kind of funny by idontgno · · Score: 1

      "I celebrated Thanksgiving in an old-fashioned way. I invited everyone in my neighborhood to my house, we had an enormous feast, and then I killed them and took their land." -Jon Stewart

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    5. Re:Kind of funny by Shark · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I find the government's actions these days quite fearsome and intimidating.

      --
      Mind the frickin' laser...
    6. Re:Kind of funny by The+Moof · · Score: 1

      Terrorism is something else and a term that gets abused to the point of making it meaningless.

      Them's sounds like terr'st words to me!

    7. Re:Kind of funny by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Native new-worlders died due to old-world disease. Wars over land killed only a tiny tiny fraction of the population.

      If you want to make accusations of ethnic cleansing, blame the germs.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    8. Re:Kind of funny by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      No no. Terrorism is like torture. It's not the same thing as when WE do it.

    9. Re:Kind of funny by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Native new-worlders died due to old-world disease. Wars over land killed only a tiny tiny fraction of the population.

      If you want to make accusations of ethnic cleansing, blame the germs.

      Especially the ones that the blankets were steeped in before we gave them to the natives...

      Let's go easy on the whitewash, eh?

    10. Re:Kind of funny by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Ethnic cleansing is when you kill people because hundreds of years ago, your ancestors and their ancestors didn't get along.

      In America, we kill people because they're in the way. It's completely different.

    11. Re:Kind of funny by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      "Ethnic cleansing" would be a better description of what the founding of America was based on.

      No. Ethnic cleansing is trying to murder your neighbors who have lived among you for centuries, based on their ethnicity.

      What happened in the US with the natives is simply called "conquest".

    12. Re:Kind of funny by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      What percentage of the population was killed in that incident? Could I come up with an anecdote about some group of native americans brutalizing a european colonist, then make a statement about all native americans?

      No, I could not. That would be misleading. You are simply being dishonest.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    13. Re:Kind of funny by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      If it was one incident, sure.

      On the other hand, if you consider that we're talking a period of a few hundred years here (really stepped up in the 15th century), you can get a good idea of just what kind of sick fucks humans can be.

    14. Re:Kind of funny by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      The contaminated blanket thing went on for a few hundred years? I'll have to ask for your source on that.

      Fighting over land is not interesting. All dirt on the planet exchanged hands due to fighting. There are no rightful owners of land.

      Exterminating entire populations is a different thing entirely. A crime against humanity. But the European colonists did not exterminate the native population. They died off due to disease--A natural thing, insignificantly impacted by that blanket tactic.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    15. Re:Kind of funny by superwiz · · Score: 1

      agreed. terrorism is the act of spreading fear and intimidation. unfortunately, nowadays this word is being used for anything the gov't doesn't like.

      Pretty sure you dropped "via random acts of violence" from your definition of "terrorism". And I am not sure why anyone would link to Wikipedia for a definition... Wikipedia is a moderated collection of opinions -- not facts.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  19. LOOK ! by Anynomous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Here I am, a coward by any name.

    --
    I'm not a coward by any name.
  20. Re:Anon by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You laugh, but Ted Kennedy has already be caught up in this sort of nonsense.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  21. VA better watch out! by rotide · · Score: 5, Insightful
    VA better watch itself, all of us Slashdoters may assemble, protest and overthrow their state government!

    Slashdot is known for being a terrorist hotbed of activity.

    Seriously though, is it getting just so utterly bullshit that they list Slashdot as a potential terrorist hangout? I mean, really? Is the government this god damned stupid? I suppose in the back of my mind I always knew it was, but wow.

    I don't want to come off as a nutjob here, but this country is falling down hard. A new revolution in the next 100 years appears to be more than possible at this point. Laws are getting absolutely ridiculous.

    I realize VA is far from the federal government, but this "OMG EVERY1 IZ TERRORIZT!" stuff is getting really scary.

    Terrorist.. This decades Communist.. Make lists and round 'em up, boys!

    Fucking scary.

    1. Re:VA better watch out! by rotide · · Score: 1

      Nice try you government propagandist! We see through your guise!

    2. Re:VA better watch out! by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --I realize VA is far from the federal government--

      Your dead wrong about. We are very near to the government. DC is just across the border you know. God bless those government employees. They are the only ones buying anything right now and a lot of companies will agree with this just because of politics.

      I don't personally care but it is a crazy waste of money that you would think they could have spent better somehow.

    3. Re:VA better watch out! by Gutboy · · Score: 1

      What's scary is your obvious coded message. I noticed that each line begins with a capital letter (VSIITF), which is obviously code for "Very Serious Information, Initiate Task Five".

    4. Re:VA better watch out! by rev_sanchez · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I completely agree that "terrorism" is the fashionable word to bludgeon enemies with. One of the more ridiculous examples was from Ron Paige, President Bush's first Secretary of Education, who once referred to the National Education Association as a terrorist organization. It's essentially Godwining public discourse.

      The biggest problem with this particular instance is that, unlike the Ron Paige matter, technophobes won't be able to dismiss it as the grossly hyperbolic bullshit it is. It's highly irresponsible for public officials to label non-violent protesters as terrorists in a nation with a frightened, well armed public. This seems by far more of an act of terrorism than anything Anonymous has done.

      --
      If you didn't come to party don't bother knocking on my door. Prince '1999'
    5. Re:VA better watch out! by Shark · · Score: 1

      I realize VA is far from the federal government, but this "OMG EVERY1 IZ TERRORIZT!" stuff is getting really scary.

      When you describe terrorism as a way to coerce a population through fear... Makes you wonder who's doing it.

      Communism couldn't be maintained, they tried during the cold war so as to keep having an enemy but ultimately it failed. All you need to keep 'terrorism' going indefinitely is a bomb going off here and there any time the paranoia level goes too low to let you do whatever you want in the name of protecting people from the big bad enemy.

      --
      Mind the frickin' laser...
    6. Re:VA better watch out! by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Come off it. Some poor dumb sucker had to write a report. He had to do research. It had to contain words. So he went to yahoo and typed "Anonymous," as that was the name used by the 4chan hooligans. Slashdot came up because it uses the term "Anonymous Coward."

      This is what happened. Laziness. Probably, no one will ever act based on this portion of the report, because it's obvious BS. And if they do, and they seize slashdot servers or something, the legal system will eventually recognize it as BS (checks and balances).

      It's not a perfect system, but it's not the end of the world or of America. There always were and always will be lazy and incompetent people who will make mistakes like this.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    7. Re:VA better watch out! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Task Five? *checks code book*

      Oh gods, it's hitting the fan now... we've just got the go message for inseminating Brittany Spears with goat gametes!

      Oh, the humanity!

    8. Re:VA better watch out! by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, is it getting just so utterly bullshit that they list Slashdot as a potential terrorist hangout? I mean, really? Is the government this god damned stupid? I suppose in the back of my mind I always knew it was, but wow.

      Is there really any doubt that the American government, and indeed, the populace in general, really is that stupid?

      In the '90s rather than electing Ross Perot to the presidency, we chose that oversexed ass clown Bill Clinton

      Then, we replaced him with that poor down syndrome individual, George Duhbya Bush. Granted, we only barely dodged the bullets of having a tree-worshipping pantheist (Al Gore) for President, and a media-whoring playboy (Kerry) for president, so I guess it could have been worse.

      And now, we have socialist, anti-American Barack Hussein Obama, an Islam sympathizer, who thinks the best way to bring us back to prosperity is to raise taxes as our president. But then again, he's a better choice than Hillary Clinton, who isn't merely socialist, but a communist at heart with her "it takes a village" bullshit.

      Here in Taxachusetts we keep reelecting that flaming hothead socialist Barney Frank and the would-be fascist (not to mention verified murderer) Ted Kennedy to Congress.

      Yes, the government really is that stupid, and yet, we're even more stupid for putting these ass clowns into office in the first place. We need to smarten up on election day if we want an intelligent government.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    9. Re:VA better watch out! by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      They have FBI agent's in WoW. These guy's are jsut making excuse's to get into every nook of people's live's.

      No, they're making excuses to get paid for playing World of Warcraft all day. Oh, and by the way, the local greengrocer want's hi's apostrophe's back.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    10. Re:VA better watch out! by richard+tarantula+ · · Score: 1

      A lot of people are talking about "how bad it is getting" and yeah, I'd say in some instances, sure, the economy seems bad. Hmm. . . rouge countries with nuclear weapons -- yeah, bad. GOP congressmen saying there are 17 socialists in the House. The humanity!

      Majorities come and go, and they tend to say the same exact things. It's really kind of exhausting. Maybe it will get out of hand. . . at least that would be less predictable and more exciting.

      Joking aside, what scares me is that there are a lot more of "them" than us who are willing to listen to the bombastic rhetoric and take it truly to heart -- much of it laced with the most amazing revisionist and gross misinterpretation of basic history I've ever heard.

      It's just another bump in the road my friend, a road that was considered long ago. . . Polybius actually wrote about such a thing via Plato and Aristotle -- see anacyclosis.

      I wish more people would consider some lessons of the past, the REAL past, and not the one that is being manufactured as we go.

    11. Re:VA better watch out! by Nekosudachi · · Score: 1

      welcome to the united states of america sadly

    12. Re:VA better watch out! by Reziac · · Score: 1
      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    13. Re:VA better watch out! by spanky+the+monk · · Score: 1

      I don't want to come off as a nutjob here, but this country is falling down hard. A new revolution in the next 100 years appears to be more than possible at this point. Laws are getting absolutely ridiculous.

      perhaps sooner that you think. It seems you're not the only nutjob:
      State Sovereignty Movement Quietly Growing.
      more .

    14. Re:VA better watch out! by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      VA better watch itself, all of us Slashdoters may assemble, protest and overthrow their state government!

      But I need to stay at home and watch my code compile. Besides, SC2GG Commentator Idol is on...

      Can we do it next week? Besides, I'm not american.

  22. Obligatory (no grits) by bradorsomething · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome myself as our new tyrannical overlord.

  23. Read Between the Lines! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    Evil plans spread through /. sigs!
    How sneaky!

  24. Actually i don't have time for Terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    gotta do so much posting. Could tell you more, but i have more important things to do. Someone is wrong on the internet... again! And i have to prove it to him over and over...

  25. Well at least they don't know about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    W.A.S.T.E the secret underground postal box system used by the Illuminati.

  26. So now I know! by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2
    I always wondered who that prolific commenter 'Anonymous Coward' was. Now I know that s/he is acting to expose that bunch of dangerous lunatics: the scientologists -- so s/he has my respect as someone involved in a good fight.

    On another note: if Anonymous is going after others who are detrimental to society (eg scientologists) I suppose that we should attach the label vigilante - normally not seen as the right way of going about things. However: the authorities have completely failed to protect us from these murdering crooks (by which I mean scientologists) which is why Anonymous is doing something. What they have done is to make a lot of noise, get up the crooks' noses, etc - all legitimate, so why are they listed here ? -- is it because the govt does not like anything that it cannot control ?

    1. Re:So now I know! by stim · · Score: 1

      anonymous does allot more than fags getting dressed up and holding longcat signs up in front of Scientology churches... Their is an impressive laundry list of real crimes committed, nearly daily. While chanology is defiantly the highest profile, its actually a small percentage of the total actions.

      --
      Browse at -1 to keep an eye out for abuses.
    2. Re:So now I know! by JJJK · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if I'm supposed to mock or fear people who completely misunderstand something and then get angry at their hallucinations.

      It was kind of funny when the media reported on the "internet hate machine" and "internet terrorists" calling themselves anonymous. Or when they got Oprah to say something about "over 9000 penises". But I think this is more serious, because there seem to be people making decisions who did not even do the research to find out that calling anonymous a group is a JOKE. Even "the atheists" are more of an organization than that (that's another similar misconception...).

      Maybe they should find something better to do, like fighting windmills.

  27. Damn kids by MasseKid · · Score: 1

    GET OFF MY LAWN!!!!

  28. lone wolf activity? by catbertscousin · · Score: 1

    I prefer to think of it as a stand alone complex.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
  29. What a bunch of idiots. by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Don't want "anonymous" posts? OK, fine, I'll just get an email address from one of a jillion places, like Microsoft or Yahoo or Google, and post using my "real name", CHEWTOY347RGB, because that is SO much more REAL than being an Anonymous Coward.

    Actually, why bother? Seriously. My name REALLY IS Ralph Spoilsport. I live in Ukaipah on Rhode Island School of Design Terrace. Every morning I commute to work at Ralph Spoilsport Motors, over in West Gommorah.

    And about this "Terrorism" meme floating since 9/11. What these people don't understand is violence. When it flows from the top of the social hierarchy down, it is invisible (like being forced to work to feed yourself) or rationalised (viz. warfare).

    When violence flows UP the hierarchy from below, it is condemned (as terrorism, laziness, whatever) and persecuted (with invasions, arrests, assassinations, gitmo, etc.)

    I don't see middle eastern terrorists flying planes into towers in Oslo, or the USA invading China to remove its brutal totalitarian government. Why? Because Norway hasn't been an invasive empire since the Vikings called it quits centuries ago, and China has the ability to readily defend itself, unlike Iraq in 2003, or (as it was perceived at the time) Viet Nam in 1964, or Poland in 1939.

    If you want to stop terrorism, renounce your Empire and leave people the fuck alone. Eventually you won't be targeted for being a belligerent asshole, and you won't have to worry about scribblings by anonymous douchebags.

    It's not a problem WITH civilisation, but more the problem OF civilisation and its inherent unsustainability. If you want a better explanation, read Endgame vol 2 by Derek Jensen.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:What a bunch of idiots. by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

      When it flows from the top of the social hierarchy down, it is invisible (like being forced to work to feed yourself)

      You must be the progenitor of the Eloi tribe. You might want to read all the way to the end of the book to see how that works out.

    2. Re:What a bunch of idiots. by maxume · · Score: 1

      Historically, it has been quite necessary to work in order to feed oneself. Hell, if you use a pedantic definition of work from physics, it seems more desirable to work to feed oneself than to not.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:What a bunch of idiots. by woboyle · · Score: 1

      [quote]If you want a better explanation, read Endgame vol 2 by Derek Jensen. [/quote]

      This makes the presumption that the idiots read! They likely get their news, and political direction, from Fox "News".

      --
      Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
    4. Re:What a bunch of idiots. by Cathbard · · Score: 1
      As Voltaire put it:

      It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets.

      Same shit, different day.

      --
      "A cynic is what an idealist calls a realist" - Sir Humphrey Appleby
  30. suspicious by internerdj · · Score: 1

    Talking is also suspicious, suspicion is also suspicious. You think maybe we could just lock up the guys naming suspicious things and have a safer world?

  31. On /. by infuriatedweasel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anonymous is a coward, so I don't think they have anything to worry about.

  32. Re:Anon by cthulu_mt · · Score: 4, Informative

    In fairness though, we already know that Ted Kennedy is a murderer.

    --
    Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
  33. Wrong. by I)_MaLaClYpSe_(I · · Score: 1
    From the actual document:

    Anonymous A "loose coalition of Internet denizens", Anonymous consists largely of users from multiple internet sites such as 4chan, 711chan, 420chan, Something Awful, Fark, Encyclopedia Dramatica, Slashdot, IRC channels, and YouTube. Other social networking sites are also utilized to mobilize physical protests. Anonymous has no leader and is reliant on the collective power of individuals acting in such a way that benefits the movement. Actions attributed to Anonymous include: Habbo raids - Unwanted and prohibited behaviors in the Habbo online community Internet vigilantism reports - Self-identified Anonymous members tracked down and helped authorities capture an online sexual predator Epilepsy Foundation forum invasion - Hackers changed the coding of the website to random flashing patterns in an apparent attempt to induce headaches and seizure. Anonymous denies responsibility for this and has claimed that the Church of Scientology actually staged the attack as Anonymous in an effort to discredit the movement. Project Chanology - an ongoing electronic and physical protest campaign against the Church of Scientology

  34. Anonymous has always been a threat to power by sgt+scrub · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The US government takes fingerprints, footprints, blood type, and DNA information from people when they are born. Later they take dental prints. Until a few years ago they enforced traceable information to be placed on products that can be used destructively. Now everything has RFID tags. Communicating by phone or mail can easily be monitored, and arguably is. No thing and no body is anonymous in the physical world. Now something existing that tears down that wall, anonymous communication. Ironically, it originated by the US government so they (the government) could be free in case of a power switch. I guess there is nothing more frightening to power than freedom you must share.

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  35. 4148488291 6447060957 5270695722 0917567116 by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

    2106611863 0674427862 2039194945 0471237137 8696095636 4371917287 4677646575 7396241389
    0865832645 9958133904 7802759009 9465764078 9512694683 9835259570 9825822620 5224894077
    2671947826 8482601476 9909026401 3639443745 5305068203 4962524517 4939965143 1429809190
    6592509372 2169646151 5709858387 7745649803 5593634568 1743241125 1507606947 9451096596

    Death to all who oppose us! Glory to the Sin'dorei!

  36. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by u38cg · · Score: 5, Funny

    I seriously wonder who the hell their base belong to when they come up with idiocy like this. 4chan? Terrorists? Yeah, they terrorise people with pictures of cats with bad grammar skills. Sometimes they post foolish people's personal details. Clearly a threat to the free world as we know it. *shakes head*

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
  37. Re:solution to the 'anonymous' problem: by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Hah! Bet when those terrorists were promised 70 virgins, they didn't think of THAT!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  38. Terrorism Report by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Our report on the terrorist group is complete."
    "What did you find?"
    "Well, for one thing, we think they have been using the web to visit popular websites."
    "Okay... what else?"
    "Our findings indicate they have been eating food, possibly sourced from restaurants. Also, we think they've been engaging in verbal communication."
    "That doesn't exactly narrow it down, does it? Based on that, almost anyone could be a susp... oh! I get it. Nice work!"

    1. Re:Terrorism Report by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      Clearly the lack of the flag lapel is the only sure indicator. It's foolproof.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    2. Re:Terrorism Report by cagrin · · Score: 1

      It is very sad many people will try and make fun of this kind of news, which i believe is the definition of apathy. Our freedoms have been gradually taken away from us now for almost a hundred years and many people aren't even aware of this or bring themselves to care...very sad :(

      For those capable of opening their eyes: interview with George Green.

      --
      ~ awaiting spiritual enlightenment ~
    3. Re:Terrorism Report by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      Relax. Humor is a useful tool for highlighting absurdities, and a healthy way to deal with things that make us uncomfortable.

    4. Re:Terrorism Report by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Why not profile people who attend mosques?

      While it's true that not all Muslims are terrorists, so far, all the terrorists have been muslims!

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    5. Re:Terrorism Report by taniwha · · Score: 1

      except for the ones that weren't (the US is pretty late to the target of terror game) - remember Oklahoma city

      It is fair to say that almost all islamic terrorists are muslim ....

    6. Re:Terrorism Report by kimvette · · Score: 1

      He was a treasonous militant who targeted a government building.

      There is a difference.

      Granted, there were civilians and children there, but that is often true with strictly military targets as well (well, children are less likely to be there but there is a high likelihood of civilian presence).

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  39. Could A.C. be a wheat/chaff solution? by parc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This raises an interesting question: could I actually create an alternate communication method using A.C. postings alone? Using a cipher symbol alphabet consisting entirely of sensible words or sentences, I could hide inside of the more popular systems that allow anonymous posting and probably not even be noticed (I mean hell, how many people do more than scan the A.C. posting to see if it makes sense?).

    1. Re:Could A.C. be a wheat/chaff solution? by lord_sarpedon · · Score: 1

      I propose that an excerpt from /dev/random must be appended to every post.

      Perhaps our efforts can divert a substantial amount of government time and resources towards cracking the evul Anonymous cipher. You know, so they have less time to get actual work done. Slashdot is quite good at that in the general case, but in this case, these are jobs that nobody should be doing.

      I wonder if this could count towards my community service...

      --
      "Strangers have the best candy" -Me
    2. Re:Could A.C. be a wheat/chaff solution? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Yes it is very easy.

      Post AC on several boards. pick an order... Say 4chan,slashdot,lolcats.

      post a 3rd of the message on each... for example..

      This is agent Y checking in, ready to recieve orders becomes....

      Guvf vf ntrag L

      purpxvat va, ernql gb

      erpvrir beqref

      In a simple Rot13 spread across 3 sites. prepend each with...

      PISSOFF:Guvf vf ntrag L
      PISSOFF:purpxvat va, ernql gb
      PISSOFF:erpvrir beqref

      and now a simple perl script on the evil doer's pc can easily find and reassemble the message.

      It would be easier to use usenet and twitter though or any website that gives you an RSS feed of comments in a story. Post the message across stories in one site as well.

      TONS of way to communicate.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Could A.C. be a wheat/chaff solution? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Funny

      This raises an interesting question: could I actually create an alternate communication method using A.C. postings alone? Using a cipher symbol alphabet consisting entirely of sensible words or sentences, I could hide inside of the more popular systems that allow anonymous posting and probably not even be noticed (I mean hell, how many people do more than scan the A.C. posting to see if it makes sense?).

      What did you think slashdot memes were?

      All your base reference == mission accomplished.
      Natalie Portman reference == target acquired
      Beowulf Cluster reference == Law enforcement involved

      You didn't think people actually beat those dead horses for humor, did you?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  40. It's just a happening. by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

    --this movement has the potential to inspire lone wolf behavior in the cyber realms.--

    I don't think it's even a happening much less a full blown movement. I thought it was all kids being kids and playing pranks.

    Looks like the prank is on the State of Virginia. Is everyone of interest?

  41. What they are truly looking for... by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

    Slashdot / Anonymous terrorists?
    Nah, they are just looking for a scapegoatse.

  42. Re:Old guys to youngsters: New fangled tech scares by u38cg · · Score: 1

    Mmm. With any luck, this might be recognised as the moment that the terrorism witch-hunt jumped the shark.

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
  43. Re:Anonymous defined by Brandee07 · · Score: 1

    The short version is this:

    Anonymous is a group that has grown board of trolling each other and has started trolling people in real life.

  44. Reminds me of an experience by david.emery · · Score: 1

    When I was in college (Norwich University, a military college) we tried to pay a "friendly visit" to the Coast Guard Academy (our big football rivals, "little Army/little Navy") for a prank. We were all camouflaged up, etc, etc, but despite that we all got caught by their campus security.

    I was scared frankly shitless that I was going to be busted, fined, kicked out of school, lose my scholarship & Army career, etc. A couple of us are sitting in the security office in handcuffs, and the one 'rental cop' says on his walkie-talkie "Be advised, judging by their dress they may be hiding out in the bushes." That (intuitive grasp of the obvious) remark was the first hint that I just might survive the experience.

    Same thing applies here: High quality tech fora are the kinds of places you'd expect hackers to at least monitor, if not hang out.

    dave (who did make it to graduation and commissioning in the Army... All of our guys were caught but one, who spent 6 hours low-crawling from bush to bush to get off campus.)

  45. New rules for what qualifies as a terrorist. by 3seas · · Score: 1

    If you don't like grape jelly on your peanut butting and jelly sandwich, you are a terrorist.

    But as a matter of fact, there are anonymous remaillers and other such support for genuinely anonymous internet based communications even set up on servers at universities of law.

    Of the reasons for this is that supporting freedom of speech for those who may otherwise be subjected to restricted speech laws in the country they reside.
    Where there is wrong doing going on and victims of such, the victims are provided a way to communicate that provides some level of anonymous.

    In regards to terrorism, if you were a terrorist, would you not want some verification of who you are communicating with regarding your associates in regards to committing a terrorist act?

    So the reality of this connection between anonymous and terrorism is no more valid than claiming anyone with a motor vehicle is a terrorist.
    It is actually more an act of showing intent to suppress freedom of speech and supporting terrorism.

    Language is a tool that is onl as useful as the two or more parites who use it with an agreed upon meaning of the abstraction used.
    With this in mind and knowing a terrorist party could easily devise double talk vocabuilary that could easily slip b y NSA or other security agencies in teh world, we are all suspect of being terrorist simply because we communicate.

    Don't like grape jelly on your peanut and jelly sandwich ... who is to know that is NOT a code phrase to initiate acts of terrorism?

    But the genuine honesty of the mater is much simpler.

    The how to stop terrorism and the ability of those interested in committing terrorism from being able to enlist the help of others, is to remove reason for anyone to commit a terrorist act.

    for starters What The World Wants as opposed to what military supporters want.

  46. "From" sites? by Bazman · · Score: 1

    These people don't understand something. Nobody is 'from' Slashdot, or 4chan, or any other websites. They are just users 'of' Slashdot or 4chan. To say they are 'from Slashdot' shows a pretty basic misunderstanding of the user-website relationship.

  47. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by LordKaT · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Who the hell their base belong to?"

    You've just terrorized my brain.

  48. Virginia Fusion Center are terrorists. by Ant+P. · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Groups that exist to deny us basic freedom in the name of their religion are terrorists, aren't they?

    1. Re:Virginia Fusion Center are terrorists. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      I read all the way through the summary, wondering why a nuclear fusion facility was interested in 4chan. Okay, now I know what they are, I'm wondering why a bureau that puts out "anti-terrorism" documents of this nature is called a "fusion center". Did they just think it sounded cool?

    2. Re:Virginia Fusion Center are terrorists. by street_astrologist · · Score: 1

      You may have missed the part where during the last year or so, a large number of "fusion centers" have been set up across the nation as public-private partnerships between DHS and local governments/business leaders, to share information (spying) and to better secure/control industrial and civic affairs. Do a web search, this is not secret information.

    3. Re:Virginia Fusion Center are terrorists. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      As I said, I know what they are (now). But I still think it's a stupid, misleading name.

  49. Fark...anonymous terrorists... by reverendbeer · · Score: 1

    Rorschach's Journal. 10 April 2009. Heard a joke once: Man goes to doctor. Says he's depressed. Says life seems harsh and cruel. Says he feels all alone in a threatening world where what lies ahead is vague and uncertain. Doctor says "Treatment is simple. Get on 4chan tonight. Make humorous post mocking others. That should pick you up." Man bursts into tears. Says "But, doctor...I am Drew Curtis." Good joke. Everybody laugh. Roll on snare drum. Curtains. Fade to black.

  50. Re:Anonymous defined by snsr · · Score: 5, Informative

    Church of Scientology are a bunch of deluded d-bags.

  51. Re:Anonymous defined by Brandee07 · · Score: 1

    board = bored.

    /more coffee

  52. List of sites where people are NOT anonymous by captainpanic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Isn't it easier to list those websites where people are NOT allowed to be anonymous?

    If I were in the Virginia govt., I would block all internet, tv, radio, phone. You'll feel much safer if you don't know what's happening in the evil outside world.

  53. Yes, Virginia, by pedalman · · Score: 1

    There is an Anonymous, AND a Slashdot.

    --
    Friends don't let friends line-dance.
  54. FEAR by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

    Fat, greasy, smelly nerds with mustard stains on their dragon shirts, pot bellies, and techno soundtrack in their car... the new face of terrorism? No wonder law enforcement is up in arms, being as most police officers were the jocks they're desperately afraid of REVENGE OF THE NERDS.

    Also, SA as one of their hang out spots? All SA has is shitty photoshops and their own dumb internal memes. They're as irrelevant as genmay is, nowadays.

  55. Terrorist tools proliferation by Intron · · Score: 5, Funny

    According to the report, cell phones and digital music players have been used to transfer plans related to criminal activity, and therefore presumably could be grounds for suspicion. Podcasting is also suspicious.

    I am told that terrorists now have access to a medium that can't be wiretapped, can be folded or rolled up for ease of concealment, and can be destroyed in seconds with an ordinary match. I'm hoping that the authorities don't paper over this threat. This stuff is so cheap it practically grows on trees.

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    1. Re:Terrorist tools proliferation by LordKaT · · Score: 1

      Well considering the amount of ear rape Leo Laporte does on a weekly basis, I'm pretty sure podcasting IS terrorism.

  56. Potential is what the feds fear most by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Accurate intelligence gathering is hard with slashdot.
    Slashdot does not have a real leader's server to raid.
    There is no focal point for the feds to direct their rage.
    There is nothing to infiltrate, entrap and destroy.
    The feds hate the thousands of different one liners and links exposing and opposing them.
    Slashdot is a thousand posts of resistance.
    Like a story which moves up the firehose when needed and disappears when not, so the exposure of the Virginia Fusion Center is spread.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  57. Re:Anonymous by eltaco · · Score: 1

    once you've posted anonymously in a thread you cannot moderate the thread anymore and the comments you have moderated lose their score.
    sounds a lot like the "post anonymously" option doesn't disclose your name and keeps your karma from getting touched.

    otherwise, I'm sure they know every posssible detail there is to know about every AC and non-AC post.

    --
    It's not about fate, it's about character.
    there be no shelter here, the frontline is everywhere!
  58. While it's nice to see your name in print... by doc6502 · · Score: 1
    ...it's good to know that colleges and universities (especially colleges and universities for African-Americans) is still a "presence". From Page 9:

    Terrorist/Extremist Group Presence A wide variety of terror or extremist groups have links to Division 1 [area around the capital]. Richmond's history as the capital city of the Confederacy, combined with the city's current demographic concentration of African-American residents, contributes to the continued presence of race-based extremist groups. This area is also the site of several community colleges and urban universities that attract a diverse range of domestic and international students and professors; two area universities are designated as Historically Black Colleges and Universities. While the majority of individuals associated with educational institutions do not engage in activities of interest to the VFC, it is important to note that University-based students groups are recognized as a radicalization node for almost every type of extremist group. A small number of Division 1 area college students also align themselves with anarchist or animal and/or environmental groups.

  59. Maybe it's just me by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    But they VERY clearly regard Anonymous as a "terrorist threat." Perhaps more of a potential threat than an actual one, but don't kid yourselves, the way that they wrote about it on pages 45-46 demonstrate that they clearly take it seriously as a trouble-maker with terrorist potential. I was surprise to see Harrisonburg listed as a site of interest for Virginia and Anonymous, but it would make sense. Harrisonburg has James Madison University, one of the largest Virginia state universities, and is on a direct path between Virginia Tech and Northern Virginia, which would make it a perfect meet up point for Anonymous members at both universities and in metro DC.

  60. Re:Missed an opportunity here, folks by Qzukk · · Score: 1

    You had to post logged-in, didn't you?

    Actually, I do, since slashdot is doing their part to combat terrorism and blocking me from making more than one AC post every few hours.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  61. Hey! I want to be an onymous! by Provocateur · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do I get a free T-shirt?

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  62. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Funny
    4chan? Terrorists? Yeah, they terrorise people with pictures of cats with bad grammar skills. Sometimes they post foolish people's personal details. Clearly a threat to the free world as we know it.

    You may say that, but I have contacts within the inner circle of Anonymous, and I'm given to understand that they have a laser. And they're charging it. And they don't afraid of anything.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  63. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by somersault · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the world would be a better place without 99% of those who comment on YouTube. Kill them evil terrorists I say!

    --
    which is totally what she said
  64. Obligatory mous by Anonymice · · Score: 1

    P: Gee Brain, what do you want to do tonight?
    B: The same thing we do every night, Pinky - try to take over, the world!

    1. Re:Obligatory mous by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      Pinky, Are you thinking what I'm thinking?

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    2. Re:Obligatory mous by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I think so, Brain, but if we didn't have ears, we'd look like weasels!

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  65. infowars.com? by nike2422 · · Score: 1

    Couldn't help but notice the url for this pdf link. Do we consider anything from Alex Jones legitimate news now?

    --
    What Would Scooby Do?
    1. Re:infowars.com? by hackersword · · Score: 1

      Well ... thats kinda the point. Do you really believe that only "truth" is what ABC,NBC,CBS,FOX tell us and that if not being mention by them, must n ot be happening? Putting aside conspiracy theories, do you seriously not believe that MSM is largely and wholly corporate controlled and VERY filtered and biased? Infowars.com may not have the best reputation, one of the largest benefits of 'social media' sites or aggregators like slashdot/reddit, etc ... they can put focus on stories that are ignored or lost in the signal/noise ratio and might not have made prominence. If going to one of these sites now can put you in same category as a "miltia" or "homegrown terrorist" and establishes "probable cause" .... that is scary. Sit back and passively take the news in from the tube, anything else and your 'dangerous'. Oh, and you probably even shouldn't criticize government policy out in public, you might be labeled a terrorist.

    2. Re:infowars.com? by moxley · · Score: 1

      You are aware that the actual report didn't come from Alex Jones right?

      I'll admit that his style can be off-putting and conspiracy-centric - but he is an honest guy who is trying to expose a lot of corruption, and who really does give a fuck about freedom, the constitution, and America. I will take reporters like him any day over compromised corporate propagandists.

      He does sometimes make mistakes, or over speculate; and the conclusions he draws on some things may be different than what you or I may come to - but in general when it comes to the facts contained in his reporting he takes it seriously and if he fucks up he prints retractions.

      He has broken a lot of important stories that may not have come out any other way.

      For this particular story (as far as the leaked pdf is concerned), it's my understanding that cryptome.org had it first.

    3. Re:infowars.com? by nike2422 · · Score: 1

      It took just a short amount of effort searching to find another link for the pdf.

      http://www.legitgov.org/vafusioncenterterrorassessment_b.pdf

      And I know that the corporate owned MSM is just that, which is why I haven't watched it in years. I get my news from alternative sources. Unfortunately Alex Jones doesn't have the best reputation, despite the news stories he has broken.

      --
      What Would Scooby Do?
  66. Isn't it comforting by HangingChad · · Score: 1

    To have such l33t haX0r at the helm of cybersecurity? Someone who understands and can divine the true identities of the Anonymous, an elite cabal of terrorists bent on flooding the internets machine with p0rn and clogging the tubes. Slashdot, you're blown. Now the whole world will know that all this tech talk is just a veneer of respectability....except without the veneer.

    To the Bat Cave!

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  67. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    remeber bretheren....

    4f 6e 6c 79 20 72 65 61 6c 6c 79 20 73 74 75 70 69 64 20 70 61 72 61 6e 6f 69 64 73 20 74 68 69 6e 6b 20 74 68 61 74 20 74 68 65 72 65 20 69 73 20 61 20 73 65 63 72 65 74 20 73 6f 63 69 65 74 79 20 74 72 79 69 6e 67 20 74 6f 20 67 65 74 20 74 68 65 6d 2e 20 20 20 50 65 6f 70 6c 65 20 69 6e 20 67 65 6e 65 72 61 6c 20 61 72 65 20 74 6f 6f 20 6c 61 7a 79 20 74 6f 20 61 63 74 20 65 6e 2d 6d 61 73 73 65 27 20 74 6f 20 64 69 73 72 75 70 74 20 74 68 69 6e 67 73 20 69 66 20 74 68 65 79 20 61 72 65 20 63 6f 6d 66 6f 72 74 61 62 6c 65 2e 20 20 49 66 20 79 6f 75 20 61 72 65 20 63 72 65 61 74 69 6e 67 20 6d 69 73 65 72 79 20 61 6e 64 20 64 65 61 74 68 20 66 6f 72 20 61 20 67 72 6f 75 70 2c 20 74 68 65 6e 20 62 79 20 61 6c 6c 20 6d 65 61 6e 73 20 77 6f 72 72 79 2e 0a 0a 42 75 74 20 74 68 65 73 65 20 70 65 6f 70 6c 65 20 61 72 65 20 73 69 6d 70 6c 79 20 63 6c 75 74 63 68 69 6e 67 20 61 74 20 73 74 72 61 77 73 2e 2e 0a

    It all goes down 4/20/09 at 16:20 local time. Tell the others!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  68. Re:solution to the 'anonymous' problem: by Banichi · · Score: 1

    The thing about being a virgin in prison is you won't stay one forever. D:

  69. Re:Have to say, I'm disappointed by NoisySplatter · · Score: 1

    I'm too scared to be unidentified.

    --
    In Soviet Russia meme tires of you!
  70. Not funny at all by hackersword · · Score: 1

    How can people even really joke or find this funny? Sure 4chan was mentioned, and they are oh so hilarious. But anyplace where people are meeting for active discussion, dissent, countering MSM bias the government can now label "possible terrorist organization" and establish "probable cause"? That is horrifying

    1. Re:Not funny at all by street_astrologist · · Score: 1

      This behavior is not new on their part, so many of us now resort to jokes to dull the pain.

  71. If they make anonymous illegal, by Potor · · Score: 1

    only the criminals will be anonymous.

  72. err? by Vexorian · · Score: 1

    According to the report, cell phones and digital music players have been used to transfer plans related to criminal activity, and therefore presumably could be grounds for suspicion. Podcasting is also suspicious.

    Does this mean channels of information can be used by criminals? Shocking.

    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  73. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1, Insightful


    That is why international monitoring of shark sales is so critical. Should laser-possessing members of Anonymous get their hands on one, then they will finally have everything that they need.

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  74. Social Science Research Gone Bad by HikingStick · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This report is just an example of Social Science research gone bad. Someone picked up on the fact that some individuals use "Anonymous" logons for ill, and they made a generalization that this must apply to all persons who use "Anonymous" logons. That's a cardinal sin in social science research. While a goal of such research is to make generalizations about a group, such theories must be tested before they can be asserted as even mildly authoritative. Had they simply done a little more research (or hired an outside researcher who wasn't already looking for "the devil"), they also might have learned that ordinary people will often use anonymous logons for other reasons:
    • They don't want to hassle with registering on yet another site.
    • They are using a public computer and don't want to enter their account information there.
    • They are replying to another post on a highly sensitive topic, want to speak frankly, but don't want that thread tied to their primary user identity.
    • They fat-fingered their password too many times and just don't want to bother with the reset at the time.
    • They know that others in the physical world have learned their moniker and visit the same sites, and they want to make comments that might not be well-received by their real-world counterparts.
    • They could be making political commentary and want to protect themselves from government sanction. Hey, the founding fathers did it, and it seems that we (in the United States) may have more and more reason to do that as time progresses since our government is taking on more characteristics of Big Brother lately.

    There might be dozens of other reasons why people would legitimately want to stay anonymous.

    Oh, yes, I realize I posted this one while logged in. Let them mark me an enemy of the state if they so desire.

    [I hereby raspberry those segments of United States government, or any other agencies for that matter, that conduct such shoddy research and make generalizations based on fear and incomplete information.]

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
    1. Re:Social Science Research Gone Bad by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Insightful

      [I hereby raspberry those segments of United States government, or any other agencies for that matter, that conduct such shoddy research and make generalizations based on fear and incomplete information.]

      The fact that you can do this unmolested indicates that freedom of speech isn't nearly dead in the US. Read the article, it's a lot less inflammatory than the summary.

      --
      Qxe4
    2. Re:Social Science Research Gone Bad by street_astrologist · · Score: 1

      The fact that you and HikingStick have not yet been molested for First Amendment activities doesn't comfort the hundreds of thousands of citizens who have been demonstrably, unjustly targetted by the new security apparati in this decade.

    3. Re:Social Science Research Gone Bad by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? What hundreds of thousands of citizens have been unjustly targetted by the new security apparati in this decade? I'd like to hear about this.

      --
      Qxe4
  75. Typical paranoid rantings from... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    .. a group of people who will never be happy until everyone is forced to have a placard draped around their neck listing their name, address, and, perhaps most important, political affiliation. How these people manage to walk down a crowded city street without having an anxiety attack is beyond me: ``I don't know who that person is. I think I should be scared of them. And that person... and that one, too!''

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  76. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by ildon · · Score: 1

    You're supposed to post that as AC. Ah crap...

  77. Oh Hai! by BigBlueOx · · Score: 1

    Ah iz en Slashdot postin as ahnonymous coward plotting mai neffarious terrorist plotz.

  78. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by u38cg · · Score: 1

    Frankly, I would sign up to that even if they weren't terrorists. Fukken sheep.

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
  79. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by Shark · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, they got me last year...

    --
    Mind the frickin' laser...
  80. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by FooAtWFU · · Score: 5, Funny

    Phew. For a moment I thought you were going to say "09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0". We would have been doomed.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  81. cell phones and music players by sjs132 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    " According to the report, cell phones and digital music players have been used to transfer plans related to criminal activity, and therefore presumably could be grounds for suspicion. Podcasting is also suspicious.
    "

    Wow.... "THEY" (ie, the "man") really fear us... I was @ DC for Cherry Festival just last week. I didn't understand why they made an announcement on the subway ("Metro" for the knowledgables) about how we were not to have our cell phones and digital music players out on the train, and to report supicious packages. I didn't understand the cell phone / mp3 player part till I reall the above. And as far as supicious packages go, all packages are supicious now-a-days if they are not mine.. How many times do you hear about donuts and flower/chalk being blown up by police because someone dropped a box and didn't get back to it in time...

    I thought we would get "Change" but I guess not yet...

    --
    --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
    1. Re:cell phones and music players by inquisitive_cherub · · Score: 2, Informative

      You most likely misunderstood. As a daily Metro rider I can tell you that they have announcements requesting the use of headphones with portable electronic devices so as to not disturb fellow riders.

    2. Re:cell phones and music players by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      Rest assured the Metro is mostly bark with their announcements. They don't have enough money to hire real security.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    3. Re:cell phones and music players by sjs132 · · Score: 1

      Ahh... Then I'm not supposed to worry about suspicious packages, either? Darn...

      Maybe they need to get better speakers on the train, because it did sound horrid and we did have a hard time trying to make it out... I think we didn't get it all untill the 3rd time she made the announcement.

      But I still hold to that we are all suspects if we have cell phones and mp3 players... It adds a nice touch of Paranoia to the average day.

      --
      --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
    4. Re:cell phones and music players by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      But they will arrest you for eating that sammich. Or cussing.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  82. Interesting iTunes connection by St3rcus · · Score: 1

    According to the report, cell phones and digital music players have been used to transfer plans related to criminal activity, and therefore presumably could be grounds for suspicion. Podcasting is also suspicious. If you check out the VA Governor's home page: http://www.governor.virginia.gov/ You will find: April 7 -- Building on a number of recent initiatives designed to take learning beyond the classroom, Governor Timothy M. Kaine today announced the official launch of "Virginia on iTunes U,"(direct link, requires iTunes) a dedicated area within Apple's iTunes Store featuring free access to educational content. Through iTunes U for K-12 education, students, teachers, and other interested users can "learn on the go" by downloading audio and video content onto an iPod, iPod touch, or iPhone from any computer with Internet access. Encourage their use and then...bam...label them terrorists... Well played Governor Kaine, well played.

  83. Not as bad as it sounds by raduf · · Score: 1

    Did anyone actually RTFA? The part about Anonymous and what I read from the rest was pretty much common sense. Didn't try to make terrorists out of kids, and the only obvious "scare tactic" I found was that they had red headers in the pdf. I actually feel better knowing somebody is keeping an eye on things, just in case.

    That being said, I think I understand a bit more about why there is a need for active watchdogs to supervise the police. Given their job they cannot sympathize with the organizations they investigate - and if they do it's likely they won't do their job right. Everything they see or hear about say, an animal rights group is through the perspective of possible trouble. And it is as it should be, that's what they are being paid for. But you cannot let the same people also guard personal rights... and the fault for the consequences belongs to whatever politician thought it was possible.

  84. The problem is... by cenc · · Score: 1

    The problem is people are just that stupid. They will really take that crap seriously.

    I was once talking with a fellow student at my university on break about what classes he was taking the next semester. He said he wanted to take a course from "Professor Staff". Me and a few other students got a couple of chuckles in before the student went on to say, "I can not believe how many classes that guy teaches".

    There was like over 1,000 courses in the schedule all marked "Staff" under the teacher because they did not know who was teaching. He was completely serious, and we continued to talk about it for a good 10 to 15 mins. The guy just did not catch on, or put it together.

  85. SlashDot Anonymous user is obviously a terrorist by hAckz0r · · Score: 1
    Yea, I've been wondering about this Anonymous guy too. It seems that he is everywhere! Almost any site on the Internet you look at, there he is. He sure gets around. Trolling mostly, but it seems like he is just trying to be completely unpredictable as to stymie all the Government Home Land Security 'profilers' and cause all the legitimate Slash-dotters to waste enormous amounts of their time arguing over silly and petty opinion, missing work, slowing productivity, and generally causing the economy to collapse in the process. He just creeps me out sometimes, and we all know he is up to no good! This just smells of a Terrorists plot I tell you. I just bet he is even hiding and disseminating propaganda materials right here on SlashDot and no doubt trying to recruit others for his cause, but which one? His opinion and topics change almost as quickly as one can post comments! This guy is hard to figure out.

    A while back I took it upon myself to try to expose this creep for what he is, so I took all the normal hacking tools I could gather up and went at it. The only trouble is this guy is a genius of disguise. Not one password cracking tool could guess this 'Anonymous' users SlashDot password! No matter how hard I tried I just couldn't manage to get it. So, I tried the brute force method, starting with 'a', then 'b', then 'c', all the way out to the length of twenty characters and not one got me into his 'Anonymous' account! This guy is obviously good at making uncrackable passwords. In fact almost every site I tried I just could not get in. Now I finally understand why this 'war against terror' takes so much time, money, and resources.

  86. The Feds continue to push this crap through by cagrin · · Score: 1

    They got caught on The MIAC Report only a few weeks ago.

    ...and why the fuck do i have to wait over 11 minutes between posting commnents, wtf!!

    --
    ~ awaiting spiritual enlightenment ~
  87. Please allow me to introduce myself, by jweller · · Score: 1

    I'm a man of wealth and taste.

  88. Breathing may be a crime! by woboyle · · Score: 1

    Criminals and terrorists use breathing to assist in their nefarious activities! Anyone who breaths should be considered suspicious and immediately reported to proper authorities!

    Fargh! Who in the heck put these half-witted imbeciles in charge of our security? Oh, it was us... I guess we get what we deserve because of our short-sighted quest for "absolute security". Of course, there is no such thing, and to paraphrase one of our founding fathers, "Those who eschew freedom for security are neither free nor secure". Living has its risks, and living in a Nanny State will not change that. So, I suppose if I clicked on the "Post Anonymously" check box above, it could be considered suspicious by the State of Virginia? What morons! Will someone please take away their secret decoder rings from these idiots?

    --
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
  89. You might want to adjust your tinfoil hat by wiredog · · Score: 1

    I think the mind control rays aren't being focused properly.

  90. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes! We are Anonymous, we are legion, we do not...

    ...Oh bugger.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  91. Okay, now imagine. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    . . . that Bush/Cheney are still in power.

    That chill which went down all of your spines when you first read the article just got chillier, didn't it?

    I'm no Obama fan, but given the choice between soft and hard fascism. . . The Bush legacy is going to keep on giving for a while, I think.

    It's because of stuff like this that people who know their history got all worked up over the Neo-con rise to power and the Iraqi war D-Day which half of the ignorant folks here were practically ejaculating over with little visions of 'command & conquer' tanks dancing before their eyes. Sorry, guys, but you got skunked, and now the law enforcement in Virginia and other strong-holds of armed and brain damaged, "Is it a W or an M," people have their list criteria compiled. And if the Virginian state police can think it, then you can be 100% certain that Fatherland Security got there first, probably in the first six months. And the scary thing about such people is that they don't think. --Once you're labeled, that's it for you. The assault-rifle wielding black-armor task-force orcs with "POLICE" or "ATF" or whatever printed in white upon their backs who surge through apartment building hallways in that half-crouched war zone walk. . . You can't say, "Hey, let's talk about this. You've got the wrong guy! I voted for McCain!"

    No. They don't listen. It's been programmed out of them, Mister Buttle. You'll have plastic cutting into your wrists, because some infantile W or M person has made a brain-damaged decision which they don't have the emotional maturity to admit might have been the result of a personal error.

    The ironic part is that I suspect more than half the AC posts around here are keyed in exactly by the 'command & conquer' people.

    That's how it works. Even those who salute the flag have a fair chance of ending up crucified.

    -FL

    1. Re:Okay, now imagine. . . by street_astrologist · · Score: 1

      And this is why the Obama win was such a good thing for the country in the long run.

      When right-wing partisans are inconvenienced, annoyed and downright pissed off by the Obama administration displaying the exact same behavior that irked the lefties when it came from the Bush-Cheney administration (rampant taxation, deficit spending, elective wars, loss of civil liberties), these conservative folks may come to realize (as many on the left did in the past administration) that NEITHER major party has had their interests in mind for some time now.

      To put it another way, the other shoe is dropping.

      At this point we the people should finally be able to drop the distractions/partisanship, and set aside our petty differences in favor of real solutions to the problems facing the nation, the states and our cities.

      </pipedream>

  92. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by Todd+Fisher · · Score: 1

    Do your contacts know how is babby formed and how girl get pregnant?

    --


    --I'm not talking about dance lessons. I'm talking about putting a brick through the other guy's windshield.-
  93. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by plasticsquirrel · · Score: 1

    As a member of Virginia Anti-terrorists Anonymous, I've already cracked this code and alerted the proper authorities about this dangerous "Anonymous" group Slashdot.

    However, sometimes I really think that only stupid paranoids think that there is a secret society trying to get them. I mean, people in general are too lazy to act en-masse' to disrupt things if they are comfortable. Of course, if you are creating misery and death for a group, then by all means worry. But these people are simply clutching at straws...

    Fortunately, I spend so much time infiltrating these Anonymous groups and cracking their secret codes, that I can usually suppress these sort of thoughts to the back of my mind. Well, now it's time for me to go back to investigating the 4chan terrorist network.

    --
    Systemd: the PulseAudio of init systems
  94. They are very ignorant, and can be destructive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's NOT a joke. It's VERY serious. They are extraordinarily ignorant, yes. But they believe in doing damage as a way to solve what they perceive as problems. (1,000,000 Iraqis and those of their families who are still living can verify that.)

    This is nonsense: "Slashdot gets a mention on page 45 - not as a terrorist organization itself, but as one of the places that member of Anonymous may hang out". In the minds of extremely ignorant angry people, providing a place for terrorists is the same as being a terrorist.

    However, let's not get too extreme. If Slashdot editors are sent to prison, it will probably be for bad editing, not for helping terrorists and therefore being terrorists themselves. For example, "that member of Anonymous may hang out" is bad English. It could be "that members of an Anonymous group may hang out".

    When the violent dictatorial regime gains complete control, Cowboy Neal will post (heavily censored) stories like this from his prison cell: "DRM is a wonderful way to assure order in the world." "Let's praise the brilliant insights of those who wrote the DMCA." Essentially the same old stuff, just moved several thousand miles to the west.

    Would they kill YOU? Would they kill members of your family? Yes, they would. Your safety comes only from the fact that they are not likely to focus on you.

    1. Re:They are very ignorant, and can be destructive. by superbus1929 · · Score: 4, Funny

      If it means KDawson gets locked up, then I welcome our new Governmental overlords.

      --
      Let's stop dilly-dallying and just change "-1: Overrated" to "-1: Disagree" or "-1: Doesn't Subscribe to Groupthink".
    2. Re:They are very ignorant, and can be destructive. by Quothz · · Score: 1

      For example, "that member of Anonymous may hang out" is bad English. It could be "that members of an Anonymous group may hang out".

      It is bad English, but only because of your typo. The phrase "that members of Anonymous may hang out" is fine; it refers to a group named "Anonymous". Your suggestion, on the other hand, is poor English, because it breaks capitalization rules. It also changes the meaning of the phrase.

      Remember the rule: A grammar flame invariably contains at least one grammatical error. Even this one.

  95. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by plasticsquirrel · · Score: 1

    Shit, I forgot to post anonymously.

    --
    Systemd: the PulseAudio of init systems
  96. "Podcasting is also suspicious" by iLogiK · · Score: 1

    According to the report, cell phones and digital music players have been used to transfer plans related to criminal activity, and therefore presumably could be grounds for suspicion. Podcasting is also suspicious.

    Cars have been used to transport terrorists and guns. If you're driving a car, you might be a terrorist

  97. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by Stephan202 · · Score: 5, Informative
    For those too lazy to make the conversion, here's Lumpy's message:

    "Only really stupid paranoids think that there is a secret society trying to get them. People in general are too lazy to act en-masse' to disrupt things if they are comfortable. If you are creating misery and death for a group, then by all means worry.\n\nBut these people are simply clutching at straws..\n"

    (Python: ''.join(map(chr, map(lambda x: int(x, 16), s.split()))))

  98. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by dimeglio · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is Coward the only member of Anonymous? That's not much of a threat.

    --
    Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
  99. Incognito by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Classic case of a GIGO system (Garbage In Garbage Out). The fusion center (would that be cold fusion?) decided that any reference to Anonymous is terrorist related because some group calls themselves Anonymous. Okay. Got it. So if Slashdot used "Incognito" instead of "Anonymous" that would be fine and dandy. Yep, that's the ticket. Gee, maybe Slashdot should sue the fusion center citing the Monster Cable precedent.

  100. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    I agree!

    Kill all the mindless followers! Let's get a good old lynch mob organised on 4chan.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  101. Call their Suspicious Activity Hotline by jocknerd · · Score: 1

    I just saw someone with an iPod AND a cellphone. Definitely must be a terrorist. Better call their hotline. 877- 4VA-TIPS

  102. This is so SAD! by blondie.xo · · Score: 1

    Seriously, like WHAT is our world coming to? Makes me mad!

  103. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    I like the way you put spaces between the hex values so I start debug.exe, enter e 100 and paste it in.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  104. Much ado about nothing much by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    I don't see the threat from Anonynmous COWARD.

    Then again, they should fear the 4-digit /.'rs lurking behind some ACs. A bit of code in the right place, and *poof*...

    Of cou&**&^uuuuuuuNO CARRIER

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  105. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by Exception+Duck · · Score: 1

    70666674

  106. signs of terrorism... by number6x · · Score: 1

    Notice how police and security organizations fit this description so well...

    • There are often police and security personnel at or near sensitive facilities, including government, military or other high profile sites or places where large numbers of people congregate
    • Police and security personnel often engage in surveillance, including recording or monitoring activities, drawing diagrams, note taking, use of cameras, binoculars or other vision-enhancing devices or possessing floor plans or blueprints of key facilities
    • Police and security personnel elicit and have obtained information regarding the operation, security and personnel-related information regarding key facilities. This has been done by mail, fax, e-mail, telephone or in person.
    • Police and security personnel often engage in tests and attempts to measure reaction times to security breaches or to penetrate physical security barriers or procedures in order to assess strengths and weaknesses
    • Police and security personnel stockpile supplies of items that could be used in a terrorist act by others. This may include the acquisition of explosives, weapons, harmful chemicals, flight manuals, law enforcement or military equipment, uniforms, identification badges or the equipment to manufacture false identification
    • Police and security personnel are often in the presence of Suspicious Persons: Someone who does not appear to belong in a workplace, neighborhood or business establishment due to their behavior, including unusual questions or statements they make
    • Police and security personnel often engage in Dry Runs/Trial Runs: Behavior that appears to be preparation for an act. Their activities could include mapping out routes and determining the timing of traffic lights and flow
    • Police and security personnel engage in the deployment of assets: Placing people, equipment and supplies into position to commit an act. This is the last opportunity to alert authorities before the act occurs

    Why do so many cops have those cheesy 'cop mustaches'? Is there some cultish religious significance or just bad grooming?

    Seems like the Virginia state police has painted a picture of the average terrorist that describes themselves much more accurately than it describes anyone on Slashdot.

    1. Re:signs of terrorism... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Seems like the Virginia state police has painted a picture of the average terrorist that describes themselves much more accurately than it describes anyone on Slashdot.

      Silly person, the Virginia State Police can't be terrorists because they're the "good guys"! They are the ones who label others terrorists, not the other way around!

      Besides, they have uniforms and badges and *everything*!

      Don't you understand how this works?

      Now move along and stop this crazy-talk before the police taser you three times within seconds, then shoot you three times point-blank in the chest with a .40-cal while in convulsions for being a "person of interest"!

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    2. Re:signs of terrorism... by number6x · · Score: 1

      Did I say the police were terrorists?

      I thought I said that the description they came up with applies to themselves more closely than it does to the typical Slashdotter.

      Hey, its their description not mine.

  107. In other news by kc8jhs · · Score: 1

    In other news, anything that you don't understand is scary and could be used for bad stuff.

    It's kinda like how when riding around with a much older friend, and he went off on skateboarders (while driving by a municipal park with facilities for skateboarders) I pointed out that not all skateboarders are in gangs, or destructive towards property, and that practicing in a park may be a more constructive activity than their alternatives.

    He had never thought of skateboarding like that before, as he had only heard it mentioned in other contexts and had not considered the alternative I put forth. Like virtual everything in life, there are good guys that take part, and bad guys.

  108. Re: The jokes being made about this report by cagrin · · Score: 1

    Ignorance and apathy are the two most dangerous diseases of our time, and very difficult to cure.

    --
    ~ awaiting spiritual enlightenment ~
  109. Re:Anonymous by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

    Somewhat correct. Checking the post anonymously box winds up just not showing your name or affecting your karma, but if you don't log in, I think you can still post anonymously in a thread you moderated, and all they have is your IP address and timestamp.

    A sufficiently paranoid person could go check out slashcode and try to figure it out if they wanted to. Or use a different browser from what they do their usual activity on and connect via proxy, and then they're safe.

  110. Anonymous by mrsquid0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anonymous's ideology sounds intriguing. How does one go about joining them? I would like to subscribe to their newsletter.

    --
    Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
  111. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by dfdashh · · Score: 3, Informative

    Perl hint: s/([a-fA-F0-9]{2})/chr(hex $1)/eg;

    --
    df -h /my/head
  112. SO being in an activist is SUBVERSIVE now?? by starshinecruzer · · Score: 1

    I don't usually rant, but when I see the ham-fisted arm of the Old World lashing out, my blood boils.

    Authority doesn't understand group consciousness on the 'net, how it can group people together. They glom it with the 60's protest groups or terrorist cells, not seeing them as concerned groups of people protesting within the laws of the U.S.

    They fear it because they don't understand it, they can't stop it or control it. They're the Old World, and can't understand the New one, so they fear it, try to find some way to control it or mitigate it.

    Soon things will grow beyond their ability to control, the protests will expand beyond Scientology and attack other memes that we cannot tolerate. THAT will be when the Old world will lash out at us, when they are wounded and their ultra-conservative way of life ebbs.

    We have a leader who understands that, who is aware of the internetworked world, but a conservative Republican party that is writhing as it dies and becomes confused old men. I worry about how they shall lash out when their death-knell comes, when the Young supplant the Old more drastically than ever before.

    1. Re:SO being in an activist is SUBVERSIVE now?? by stim · · Score: 1

      Wow, you possess such a fundamental misunderstandings of the world. astounding.

      --
      Browse at -1 to keep an eye out for abuses.
    2. Re:SO being in an activist is SUBVERSIVE now?? by starshinecruzer · · Score: 1

      Wow, you possess such a fundamental misunderstandings of the world. astounding.

      Uh, okay. So what am I misunderstanding?

    3. Re:SO being in an activist is SUBVERSIVE now?? by street_astrologist · · Score: 1

      Mostly I think GP is referring to your drawing a distinction between the Republican Party and the Democratic Party; no such distinction is any longer apparent to many of us.

  113. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by fugue · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm betting it goes something like this:

    People who blow shit up are likely to be antisocial.

    People on slashdot, 4chan, etc., are likely to be antisocial.

    Therefore people who read slashdot are likely to blow shit up.

    Can't blame them, really, given the quality of education we as a society have decided to give our citizens. Makes me so angry I want to blow some shit up. Who's with me?

    --
    "The biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has taken place."
  114. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by rcb1974 · · Score: 1
    For those of you who can't read hex,

    4f 6e 6c 79 20 72 65 61 6c 6c 79 20 73 74 75 70 69 64 20 70 61 72 61 6e 6f 69 64 73 20 74 68 69 6e 6b 20 74 68 61 74 20 74 68 65 72 65 20 69 73 20 61 20 73 65 63 72 65 74 20 73 6f 63 69 65 74 79 20 74 72 79 69 6e 67 20 74 6f 20 67 65 74 20 74 68 65 6d 2e 20 20 20 50 65 6f 70 6c 65 20 69 6e 20 67 65 6e 65 72 61 6c 20 61 72 65 20 74 6f 6f 20 6c 61 7a 79 20 74 6f 20 61 63 74 20 65 6e 2d 6d 61 73 73 65 27 20 74 6f 20 64 69 73 72 75 70 74 20 74 68 69 6e 67 73 20 69 66 20 74 68 65 79 20 61 72 65 20 63 6f 6d 66 6f 72 74 61 62 6c 65 2e 20 20 49 66 20 79 6f 75 20 61 72 65 20 63 72 65 61 74 69 6e 67 20 6d 69 73 65 72 79 20 61 6e 64 20 64 65 61 74 68 20 66 6f 72 20 61 20 67 72 6f 75 70 2c 20 74 68 65 6e 20 62 79 20 61 6c 6c 20 6d 65 61 6e 73 20 77 6f 72 72 79 2e 0a 0a 42 75 74 20 74 68 65 73 65 20 70 65 6f 70 6c 65 20 61 72 65 20 73 69 6d 70 6c 79 20 63 6c 75 74 63 68 69 6e 67 20 61 74 20 73 74 72 61 77 73 2e 2e 0a

    ...translates to: "Only really stupid paranoids think that there is a secret society trying to get them. People in general are too lazy to act en-masse' to disrupt things if they are comfortable. If you are creating misery and death for a group, then by all means worry. But these people are simply clutching at straws.."

  115. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    Wow... Having access to debug.exe in 2009.

    I am both awed and frightened.

  116. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by sven.johnson · · Score: 1

    Correlation implies causation! Science agrees.

  117. Local Vs. Internet by stoicio · · Score: 1

    *"A 'loose coalition of Internet denizens,' Anonymous consists largely of users from multiple internet sites such as 4chan, 711chan, 420chan, Something Awful, Fark, Encyclopedia Dramatica, Slashdot, IRC channels, and YouTube"*

    This is like saying *Terrorists may use the bus as a mode of transportation*
    or perhaps they even *own a phone*.

    What is it about the internet that is presumed any more dangerous than a citizens band radio,
    telephone, fax machine,....etc., pictures?

    Locally based communications are far more dangerous due to the consolidation of physical
    ability of groups in one locale. Therefore, technically speaking, citizens band radio, FRS
    hand held units and cellphones are far more dangerous. (if at all)

  118. Alex Jones is crazy by gwythaint · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, Infowars is not a reliable source of information.

  119. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by cogear · · Score: 1

    Is it attached to the head of a shark? If not I don't believe that it is a true threat.

  120. Short Version by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    "You are under attack and in imminent danger, surrounded by enemies and saboteurs. Give us power and we'll keep you safe."

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  121. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by meregistered · · Score: 1

    Exactly like

  122. Yet Again... by nathan.fulton · · Score: 1

    To mention groups like anonymous in a report on terrorism detracts from the gravity that should be attributed to the term terror -- especially since, once you are a terrorist, you have no more rights in this country.

    This just affirms by belief that some of the worst conspiracy theorists are often in law enforcement and the Military. The amount of doublethink involved in calling something a terrorist organization because it 1) has no defined goal or purpose and 2) isn't organized is mind boggling. The justification is antithetical to the label! And if Anonymous isn't a terrorist organization, why am I paying someone to investigate it using money that should be allocated to fighting real terrorism? If anything, the largest threat anonymous poses is distracting us from real threats -- just like any troll.

    I have a question for the authors of the report: what ISN'T terrorism? If reading other people's email (which they legally shouldn't be using anyway) justifies investigating someone as a terrorist threat, what isn't justified in the name of national security? If I break the law, am I a terrorist?

    1. Re:Yet Again... by street_astrologist · · Score: 1

      As others have posted, the inclusion of Anonymous in TFA is likely a nod to powerful Scientologists who have influenced the priorities of our new, ever-expanding security state.

      (Recently, Anonymous led a rather successful campaign involving spontaneous street protests against Scientology.)

  123. can I join? by cohomology · · Score: 1

    I don't belong to Anonymous, but if things get any worse I might want to join. How do I get in?

    --
    Don't mess with The Phone Company. Piss them off and you'll be using two tin cans and a piece of string.
  124. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by meregistered · · Score: 1

    You're ruining the fun now the stupid paranoids will actually know what was said... (because it's unlikely with the level of intelligence they have shown previously they would figure it out)

  125. Umm, by kimvette · · Score: 1

    So, like, does that mean I am a terrorist because I am a slashdotter?

    Let's see, where is the checklist. OK here we go:

    I am/I do:

    * a Ron Paul supporter
    * carry a copy of the Constitution with me (in my PDA)
    * carry controversial religious texts with me (the CJB and NASB translations of the Bible in my PDA and on my laptop)
    * carry texts written in a middle-eastern language on my laptop (the tenach, or "Jewish Bible," or "old testament" if you wish)
    * am a libertarian
    * I have watched America: Freedom to Fascism and have read both Gary Kah's and William Cooper's books
    * believe the second amendment means what it says: the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, and am mystified as to why "shall not be infringed" is so fucking hard for politicians to comprehend (although I do not own a gun. I've fired guns though, and had a lot of fun doing it. Even shot apart a junk car one time!)
    * had a chemistry set and also built electronic devices from scratch, including timer devices (see next point)
    * built pipe bombs (well, honestly, my brother and dad (and a few police officer friends of my dad) made them. I improved my brother's designs because he wanted a bigger boom) and model rockets with my brother and blew up mounds of dirt on my parents' property back in the 80s. (that would get me and my brother arrested nowadays. Back then the cops would come over and make and set off those homemade fireworks with us!)
    * am patriotic/nationalist and believe we have a responsibility to put our own national interests (and those of our allies/friends) ahead of the "global community"

    and now:

    * am a slashdotter

    And yet, I'm not a criminal. I have never shot anyone, engaged in conspiracy to blow any buildings up, or blow anyone up. I'm not an illegal alien.

    I just believe I have the right to engage in academic interests and hobbies, have the right to own any weapon which could be used to hold tyranny at bay or to protect myself, and an am "American citzen" not a member nor supporter of the "global community" in the sense that one-world-government types would like to consider me.

    Also:

    * I believe tolerance is being mature enough to agree to disagree, not thinking that all "truths"/"opions"/"facts" are equally valid and true.
    * I support the right to believe in Jesus (like I do), Allah (which is bullshit but believe it if you like), Shiva, ceiling cat, or flying spaghetti monster. I won't try to force you to believe what I belive, I certainly won't threaten to kill you if you won't believe what I believe, but if you want to kill me and/or destroy my country and destroy Israel and actually intend to do it, I want you dead. You have no business going around killing people just because they disagree with you, but deserve nothing better than being dragged through city streets then covered in salt if your goal is to kill innocent people.

    I am fed up with criminals being treated as victims, and people who stand up for TRUTH (not "truths"), Justice, and the American Way (TM) being labeled terrorists and being harassed at airports and in government buildings. I'm SICK of criminals being raised up and given special protection, and being allowed to sue the real victims (their targets for burglary, armed robbery, etc.) if they're injured in the process, or shot in the process. If you're a scumbag burglar, terrorist, thief, etc. you deserve to be shot, or you deserve to slip and fall and cut yourself and bleed to death, or, if the person gets their bare hands on you and takes your weapon from you, that person should be able to beat the living crap out of you and you should NOT be able to sue.

    I am sick of preferential treatment being given to illegal ALIENS. Note: I do not refer to those assholes as illegal "immigrants" or even "crimigrants" because using the term "immigrant" in any context with regard to those thieving bastard

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:Umm, by street_astrologist · · Score: 1

      I'll end this with a quote from a bleeding-heart liberal communist:

      I'm sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and disagree with this administration, somehow you're not patriotic. We need to stand up and say we're Americans, and we have the right to debate and disagree with any administration.

      Seeing you quote this affirms my belief that the real benefit of seeing TFA's variety of blatant fascism continued under a Democratic Party administration, is that it will wake up many more Conservatives to the fact that their interests are not being represented by the Federal Government, no matter which corporate party is in office.

  126. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by matrim99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Who the hell their base belong to?"

    Us.
    Don't you worry about the details there, Sparky.

    --
    Right. No, your other right. No, the other other right.
  127. Re:Anonymous by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

    If you log out and clear your cache you can anonymously comment on pages you've already modded with no side effects.

  128. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by Icegryphon · · Score: 1

    Do you hear that? it is the sound of a SHOOP DA WHOOP!!!!!!!!!!!

  129. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by matrim99 · · Score: 1

    Hey, you were supposed to post this as our Anonymous Coward cover-user. You've really blown it blown it for the secret movement... THEY know who to focus their MoonBeams and Photons on now!

    --
    Right. No, your other right. No, the other other right.
  130. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by spitek · · Score: 1

    Lumpy!! What are you doing!! That message was supposed to only go out on the 'secure' sites not this public site!! You idiot.. Better get out your place before you get VANNED!!!! HURRY!!!!

  131. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by jank1887 · · Score: 1

    ok, someone else do the hex for me on that one. I'm too lazy to find out for myself if he said anything there.

  132. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by swaq · · Score: 2, Informative
    Translation (required hex->asci then ROT13) for the lazy:

    The statement to the effect that people acting in concert (as a pack) can "lead to lone wolf behavior in the cyber realms" is on the same level as "I CAN HAZ CHEEZEBURGER?". That is it's bound to become a meme mocking the stupidity of governement.

  133. After further investigation by WSOGMM · · Score: 1

    We believe they are in close contact with Chuck Norris and Rick Astley, and they identify one another with a code recognized as 'asl'.

  134. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by vastabo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I Groovy'd it:

    println str.tokenize().collect({(char) Integer.parseInt(it, 16)})

    Not as good (it returns a list), but quick...

  135. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

    49 20 64 6F 20 77 69 74 68 20 65 76 65 72 79 20 70 6F 73 74 21 20 3A 6E 6F 65 73 3A

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
  136. Faulty conclusions by blueg3 · · Score: 1

    They should've commented on how poor Slashdotters' reading comprehension is.

    Note:

    They're talking about "Anonymous" the "organization", not the act of posting anonymously or the Slashdot Anonymous Coward. Free speech has nothing to do with it. They're included in the report because they're a large-scale "organizaiton" connected with threats and vandalism.

    The only people dumb enough to make the association that "since terrorists can use cell phones and digital music players, owning one makes you suspicious" are those on Slashdot who will stretch to make a criticism. The reason they're listed is that they should be considered by investigators as a potential source of information or evidence.

    These sort of reports are quite common and are written at a fairly low level, so that law enforcement has a degree of familiarity with these topics.

  137. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

    I seriously wonder who the hell their base belong to when they come up with idiocy like this. 4chan? Terrorists? Yeah, they terrorise people with pictures of cats with bad grammar skills. Sometimes they post foolish people's personal details. Clearly a threat to the free world as we know it. *shakes head*

    In the days when I surfed 4chan, we would always say that ebaumsworld was doing all that stuff and we were just an imageboard that would critique one another's work. Then people started saying that the first rules of 4chan were just to make it "Fight Club Wannabes" and suddenly it became the stinkhole of the internet where you could post if you wanted to become internet-famous. You attract drama and attention-whores that way. Pull enough of those into one place and you have a terrorist threat. Obviously.

    --
    I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  138. Welcome to Slashdot by Nebulious · · Score: 1

    You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.

    1. Re:Welcome to Slashdot by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

      than ./ ? ... yeah, actually I think Fark and Something Awful have us beat :)

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
  139. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Amongst our weaponry are such diverse elements as fear, surprise, ruthless efficiency, an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope, and nice red uniforms!

  140. April fool's month? by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Geez, this is the tenth already. Fortunately all the Anonymous members of Sloshdat are cowards and will never do anything remotely dangerous.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  141. Re:Anon by gorbachev · · Score: 1

    Just make sure you don't legally change your name to Anonymous Coward and I think you'll be fine.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
  142. woah there by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

    Murderer? The dude got in a drunk driving accident, and the passenger died.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  143. Lone Wolf? by fluch · · Score: 1

    So which of you guys has just registered as "Lone Wolf" before I could do so?!

  144. Re:Anonymous by PPH · · Score: 1

    We could show you the "Anonymous Coward" secret handshake. Its sort of limp, with sweaty palms......

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  145. Re:Anonymous by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

    It's easy, just click the checkbox above the text field!

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  146. Ha! by tobiah · · Score: 1

    That'd be great. But you need to get the other websites; facebook, google, etc onboard too, to make sure "OMG Ponies" gets in the report. This could be sold as a "rebranding" by the Anonymous Overlords, sorta like with Media Sentry or Blackwater.

    --
    "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -
  147. Warning: Talking abput Fight Club by Zaphod-AVA · · Score: 1

    Look, the people you are after are the people you *depend* on! We design and maintain your hardware. We write your software. We network your systems, and recover your lost passwords. We guard your data while you sleep. Do not FUCK with us!

  148. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    Can you elaborate how you did the conversion?

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  149. So They Read Wikipedia, Too! by Velska1 · · Score: 1

    This line is lifted directly from Wikipedia (as of Apr 10, GMT 20:20)in the article about Anonymous(group) under subtitle "Composition":

    "A "loose coalition of Internet denizens",[9] the group is banded together by the internet, through sites such as 4chan,[7][9], 711chan,[7] 420chan, Something Awful, Fark, Encyclopedia Dramatica,[10] Slashdot, IRC channels,[7] and YouTube".

    Apparently, reading Wikipedia is now "intelligence gathering" or "threat assessment". I mean just insert a couple of words so it would make more sense when yanked from its original context on the Wikipedia page.

    Of course, it is true that you have to try to educate the dinosaurs above you in the food chain...

    --
    Every problem has a solution that is simple, easy and wrong. Selling our Liberty for a little Security is a much too de
  150. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

    For those of you that don't want to try ten different google results until you find an ascii/hex converter that actually works:

    http://home.paulschou.com/tools/xlate/

    --
    Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
  151. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

    Nah, people who blow shit up with other people inside are antisocial. People who blow shit up while getting drunk with buddies are social.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  152. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by TuringTest · · Score: 1

    Just because of the bad grammar. The sentence corrected for you should be:

    "Who the hell their base are belong to?"

    --
    Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
  153. Re:Anon by csartanis · · Score: 1

    [citation needed]
     
    I have no doubt that more happened that night than what Kennedy claims, but there is no proof and nothing justifies your outright lies.

  154. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by ojustgiveitup · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ruby
    str.split(/\s/).map { |c| c.hex.chr }.join

  155. Building bombs by janwedekind · · Score: 1

    In UK there are posters showing a garbage bin with illegally disposed special waste. Below the poster says: "Fortunately a neighbour reported it otherwise somebody could have used it to build a bomb."
    We Slashdot readers shouldn't complain considering how desperate other terrorists are.

  156. It's about money by BeanThere · · Score: 1

    The jobs of the people who wrote this report *depend* on there being a serious threat. It's in their interest to make as if there is a major threat. If their report simply said, "things are actually all basically OK, not much really to worry about", they'd be out of a job the next day.

    No doubt a report like this also gets used when justifying budget allocation requests, so that entire departments can be set up and allocated taxpayer money to sit around and "solve" the very pretend-threat they trumped up in the first place, and write still more reports about all 'teh scary internetz people'.

    You might as well be paying these people to dig holes and fill them in again, over and over.

    Another name might be "welfare job".

    Government bureaucrats always trump up problems, so that they can justify being given ever money to 'solve' them. I don't even think it's about power; just plain old money.

  157. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by tehstudent · · Score: 1

    Then who was base?

  158. A Special Note from the Society of Lurkers by earlymon · · Score: 1

    Hello,

    I'm the president of the Society of Lurkers. Perhaps you've heard of us, or remember us, from days gone by where we were mentioned often in various posts and articles that used words like denizens and netiquette.

    These days, one virutally never hears of Lurkers anymore, and that's just how we like it.

    But I am writing you today to discuss this shocking turn of events regarding Anonymous. As many know, Anonymous is a splinter group of Lurkers. We Lurkers are highly anxious that investigations into Anonymous will lead upsteam to us and understandably so.

    However, let's be clear - just because Lurkers are anonymous, Lurkers are not and never are Anonymous. It's true that Lurkers may on occasion post - but then only under adherence to paragraph 14, subsection iv of our charter, section titled, Pseudonym and Real Name Posting but as everyone here is aware of that, that goes without saying.

    That clause may have been forgotten as few netizens even mention us Lurkers anymore.

    We admit that from time to time we find someone attempting to maintain membership in both Lurkers and Anonymous. While both groups seem to the outside to abhor that behavior, the Lurkers approach is intervention and counseling, and expulsion only when that fails. Anonymous approach is to publicly deny this, but they will actually encourage newly Anonymous people to also be Lurkers - and the simple sad fact is that they're bitter.

    Today, they target Anonymous. We laud Slashdotters everywhere for sticking up for Anonymous, even though as Lurkers we cannot.

    I am simply writing to hope and pray in advance that should the time come, Slashdotters will protect Lurkers with equal zeal. After all, when our time comes, we won't be able to stand up for ourselves - we're the Lurkers.

    Best regards,
    EarlyMon

    --
    Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
  159. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by isilrion · · Score: 1

    Hmm.

    Even better:

    ''.join(chr(int(i,16)) for i in s.split())

  160. Re:Anonymous by budgenator · · Score: 1

    That works occasionally, acquiring a new IP address is required for it to work consistently.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  161. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

    "Who the hell their base belong to?"

    Us.
    Don't you worry about the details there, Sparky.

    Who is us and how can we stop them?

    --
    Fnord.
  162. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but then you're only blowing up stuff like computers, washing machines, microwaves, and occasionally a motorcycle or car engine.

    You can't fit people inside any of those, (except the car, but not inside the engine) so that's small time stuff. And you're right....very social. :)

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  163. Pops? by MMInterface · · Score: 1

    I'm Lone Wolf. Are you my dad?

  164. "Anonymous"...WTF??? by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

    OK, April 1 was over a week ago!

    I read this, and this was the first thought that came to mind...

    WHAT THE FUCK?????

    I can only come up with two possible explanations for this:

    (1) Somebody at the Fusion Center has a big sense of humor and a REALLY BIG set of cajones to put this in a legitimate report, or
    (2) It's computer-generated.

    I just can't believe anybody is really stupid enough to associate millions of anonymous posts on Internet forums with a "loose coalition of Internet denizens."

    --
    Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    1. Re:"Anonymous"...WTF??? by street_astrologist · · Score: 1

      They're stupid enough to put anything to do with "Anonymous" on Teh Lists, though, because the Scientologists told them to do it.

  165. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by GumphMaster · · Score: 1

    I'm just glad this message didn't come from Anonymous... then we'd have all had something to be worried about

    --
    Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
  166. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by Safiire+Arrowny · · Score: 1

    Nice Haskell, in with Ruby:

    str.split(/\s/).map{|b| b.hex.chr}.join

  167. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

    I think the real issue is that people that go to 4chan also tend to go to one of the other dozen websites, but being anonymous it's unpossible to track the 4chan users and thus they are counted as different users when they repost shit on other sites like slashdot and fark.

  168. Vote Time!!! by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

    Ok, time for a vote. Simply reply to this message to cast your vote!

    I...
    a) like to blow shit up.
    b) don't like to blow shit up.

    I would like to count myself as the first vote for a)

    1. Re:Vote Time!!! by fugue · · Score: 1

      You forgot

      c) prefer to throw it at air circulation devices.

      (you insensitive clod!)

      --
      "The biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has taken place."
  169. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

    Only on slashdot would people bother to decypher that....

  170. The great question by anonymousNR · · Score: 1

    .. what should anonymous cowards call themselves ?

    1) United Anonymous Cowards
    2) Unified Anonymous League
    3) All Anonymous Associates

    --
    -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle
  171. Land of (neo)Con(servative) Fusion by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1
    Looking for witches to hunt is easy when you have FUSION CENTERS! Just about every state has one.

    Here at the Fusion Center we try our best to exploit the most out-of-sort individuals. We'll make your average tin-foil-hat-wearing Ron Paul supporter look like Timothy McVeigh. It should be noted that McVeigh was a Gulf War Veteran. So i guess we can add everyone who went to Iraq and Afghanistan to our list of potential threats.

    Goth kids are about as frightening to us as a modestly hot Italian American woman wearing a scarf! Those spooky kids who sit in the corner reading their bad poetry. What's up with them? I'll tell you what! TERRORISM! Wearing black like a S.W.A.T. team! Possibly to imitate the lobby scene from The Matrix.

    Don't forget the computer nerds with some mental illness. The fact that they have an mental illness make him an automatic head case. ADHD? ADD? High Functioning Autism? Aspbergers? They all start with the letter "A". You know what else starts with the letter "A"? ANARCHISTS! Their voodoo computer hacking witchcraft could destroy us all!

    Lets not forget Asians, Arabs, and Africans! Be sure to tell all your white friends!

    But We're not here to steretype individuals with racist anecdotes. Because God loves everyone, especially if they are white, Christian, live in an upper class suburb, are on the football team or the chearleading squad, and have rich parents who can bail them out of jail at 3 AM. The less you know the better! Just be sure to procreate as many children as possible so that we can have more soliders to make into social outcasts someday! Because without God fearing neoconservative whitebread Americas, we won't have anyone to persecute for being different!

    To say that the reminants of the previous adminstration have disappeared with the previous president is foolish. There is still more trash to take out. Fusion Centers are just one of things that we still need to get rid of.

    BTW, to you Fusion Center nuts, if you are so afraid of people who are different from you, you are part of the problem.

    "If you dislike people so much why don't you join the Klan like your parents. Otherwise, what are you rebelling against?" --Jello Biafra

    --
    The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  172. Re:Allow me... by swaq · · Score: 1

    He probably converted the hex numbers to integers' created a new string using the corresponding ASCII chars and then performed a simple string rotation cipher. Just a hunch.

    Yep, more or less. I took the hex and popped it into a hex to ascii converter (there are plenty online versions). Then I took the result and ran it through a ROT13 cipher.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ROT13

  173. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by fugue · · Score: 1

    You can't fit people inside any of those

    Well, not if you forget to chop them up finely enough. Duh.

    --
    "The biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has taken place."
  174. Complete Idiots! by wshwe · · Score: 1

    The people that wrote this report are complete idiots! The logical extension of their argument would mean banning all cell phones and iPods.

  175. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by nstlgc · · Score: 1

    I am not a Scientologist, but Anonymous is a bunch of racist, religious bigots. Anonymous, KKK, it's all the same thing. These people are domestic terrorists and should be stopped at all cost.

    --
    I'm Rocco. I'm the +5 Funny man.
  176. i hope they also mention by superwiz · · Score: 1

    That anyone wearing a police uniform and a badge is likely to exhibit violent and anti-social behavior. A police officer is much more likely to attack, insult or otherwise harm and unarmed civilian than a person of any single ethnic group, any single religious affiliation or any person involved in any other profession.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    1. Re:i hope they also mention by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Ok, I probably have to take that back. There is a single profession more indicative of anti-social behavior. Approximately 10% of all Catholic priests in the US at molested a child. The rate of recidivism among police officers is lower.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  177. Cars are used by terrorists to move around by unity100 · · Score: 1

    we should ban them. or, tie their usage into daily permission schedules.

  178. ha ha ha hahahaahah by unity100 · · Score: 1

    ahahahahaaa. that was really funny ...... ..... not

  179. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    Can't blame them, really, given the quality of education we as a society have decided to give our citizens.

    Wait, you're saying there's a correlation? So? ;-)

  180. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    For those too lazy to make the conversion

    If anyone knows how to do this on a stock XP without installing anything (such as a new language), please share.

    ('cause that's where I'm stuck right now...)

  181. Re:Anonymous defined by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    d-bags.

    Touche ;-)

  182. What is This Really? by flyneye · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, lessee, the definition of terrorist is bent to conform to individuals acting against a harmful enemy. I suspect this Vagina terrorist report is fueled by Scientologist who have infiltrated our Government. It is no joke that Scientology is considered harmful by those who have lost loved ones or friends to this mock religion/self help cult. Scientology reacts to the attitude that they are a harmful cult by redoubling their cultish efforts and proving themselves to be a wrongdoing organization of criminals on the lowdown. This is general public knowlege.
            The fact that Scientology has infiltrated the government for the purposes of furthering Scientologys agenda make them the terrorist criminals. It is easy to see what they are afraid of and what the crimes of scientology are. Their denials of criminal cult activity are the equivalent of a rhinoceros stating that it is not a rhinoceros, but a kitten instead. The infiltration and wielding of monetary power over individuals to destruction make them a legitimate target for any act of war from any individual threatened by them. Lone wolves indeed will probably eventually devise a way to out and destroy Scientology.
              Scientologies mistake is not to follow the path of the cults that proceeded them, i.e. Krisna Consciousness, Moonies, etc. Other cults still thrive today as benign and legitimate because of their use of coercion rather than force. Silly, silly Hubbardroids!
              Well I suppose once they have converted enough Democrats to their agenda, we will easily be rid of them and socialism of the modern democratic party by a just and bloody revolution.
    This is handy because we can have a wholesale clearance of injustice and deviation from our original constitution in one fell swoop. At last we will all be able to live free as we were meant to be and enabled to do so by our original founding fathers.
              Just give 'em enough rope.Don't worry be happy. Most importantly, remember the wisdom of Scientologies original nemisis the Subgenius Foundation," if you act like a dumbass, they will treat you as an equal.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  183. Using this to corrupt trade marks? by TermV · · Score: 1

    So what happens if all these site with "anonymous" accounts all changed them to "Microsoft". Would we be reading about Microsoft as a terrorist organization? Or how about if Al-Qaeda had actually called themselves "The Catholic Church"?

    I actually hope that this is a matter of the analysts fitting the "threat" into a simple model of an organized group with a catchy name so they can feed it to the idiot politicians and general public for some more funding.

  184. Oh fer cryin out loud... by DG · · Score: 1

    Oh no it isn't.

    Look, 99% of the time, the people performing the actions on that list are doing perfectly innocent and legal things.

    Guess what - law enforcement and security agencies know that. They aren't stupid or paranoid.

    But they are also tasked with protecting the public from that 1% (if it is even that high) that really DO have nefarious purposes, and they need to be able to tell the difference between somebody boarding a plane to visit their grandmother and somebody boarding a plane to smash it into a building.

    So they study the problem, and they try and find ways to isolate indicators and warnings so they can prevent attacks vice cleaning up after them.

    And the big part of the problem is that most activity that facilitates a terrorist attack is completely legal. That's how they hide. The best terrorist never does a single illegal thing (besides conspiracy) right up until he strikes.

    The outrage is entirely misplaced. Could Slashdot be used as a tool to help commit a terrorist act? Absolutely it could. So can a cellphone, or a bag of fertilizer, or a shovel.

    Studying methods of shovel use in support of terrorist activities does not mean the student of shoveling thinks all shovelers are terrorists. It means they want to understand how a shovel might be incorporated into a terrorist act, so that if they see that, in concert with other indicators, MAYBE you have something worth investigating.

    And that isn't outrageous; it is due diligence.

    DG

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
  185. Re:Anonymous defined by snsr · · Score: 1

    Maybe so :) Thanks for the check.

  186. I think the word for it is... by gpronger · · Score: 1

    Paranoid.

    In a nutshell; if we can't track who you are and what you say, you must necessarily be up to no good.

    ...using incomprehensible technology (ipods) to carry terrorists plots.

    "Anonymous Coward"; I wonder how large your FBI portfolio is?

  187. Re:Message to Virginia Fusion Center, from Anonymo by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

    or another Python variation:

    binascii.unhexlify( s.replace(' ', '') )

  188. Re:solution to the 'anonymous' problem: by taucross · · Score: 1

    I lol'd.

    --
    "In the absence of the ability to establish the attribute of truth they tried to establish the noble attributes."