Slashdot Mirror


Closing Time At Microsoft's Campus Pub

theodp writes "Just three days before the Spitfire pub was to open on Microsoft's Entertainment & Devices Division campus, TechFlash reports that Microsoft got cold feet and pulled the plug on the project, leaving the bar's owner and his 22 employees in the lurch. 'I am completely stunned and disappointed by the decision,' said now lease-less owner Jonathan Sposato, who's stuck with space built out as a pub, complete with a giant bar, a fireplace, and eight beer taps. (He says it wouldn't be economically viable to refit it as a restaurant.) Microsoft spokesman Lou Gellos confirmed the company's sudden change of heart: 'The goal was always to create a cool gathering place for employees, but to do so in a manner that's consistent with a business environment. We decided we should do something more appropriate, and that meant not having a pub.' The new pub had been in development for more than a year."

53 of 393 comments (clear)

  1. Last Post by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The goal was always to create a cool gathering place for employees..." Where? The state unemployment office?

    Some of these people "...left other jobs to work in the pub" That was a really sleazy move by MS.

    1. Re:Last Post by sortius_nod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Are you retarded? Seriously, beer taps are COMPLETELY different to any other type of tap. They are designed for beer, and beer only. They are designed to keep beer (not juice, soft-drink (or as you Americans would call it pop or soda), or even water cold), reduce froth in beer, etc.

      Such a statement is so stupid it's not funny. The guy has obviously spent thousands of dollars fitting out the place to be a bar (fridges, taps, bar, furniture) that to refit to anything else would put him so far out of pocket he'd bankrupt himself.

      Not only that, but bar staff are different to wait staff. They are trained to do a different job, at least here in Australia they are. They require an RSA (Responsible Service of Alcohol) certification and need to know what drinks to mix, etc. Meanwhile, wait staff need to know the difference between various dishes, how long they can be left, how to make a decent coffee, etc.

      It seems the owner's best avenue would be to sue, but unfortunately MS will fight that until he's broke. So either way, he's fucked 6 ways from Sunday.

    2. Re:Last Post by Daengbo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Microsoft, where neither the source nor the beer are free. ;) j/k

    3. Re:Last Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You need to move on to hard drugs to explain Clippy.

    4. Re:Last Post by d3ac0n · · Score: 4, Funny

      Scratch that.

      Found it!

      :)

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    5. Re:Last Post by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It seems the owner's best avenue would be to sue, but unfortunately MS will fight that until he's broke. So either way, he's fucked 6 ways from Sunday

      The best avenue for any business owner is to never, under ANY circumstances, do business with MS. This applies to being a reseller, partner, customer, or certification holder. Don't use hotmail. Stop using windows and MS applications. Stop using MS formats and file systems.

      One of my projects a while ago was to develop a checklist that one could go through to be 100% MS free. It turned out to be larger than I thought, but I've been happy ever since with my technology.

      BBH

  2. MS Screws it's partner. News at 11. by Forge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm taking bets that this contract dosn't put the cost of this "change of heart", where it rightfuly belongs.

    Hurray for the MS Legal teem, once again ensuring that Microsoft can screw it's business partners with impunity.

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  3. Sad reality by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The unspoken reality at Microsoft is that there is a large minority of Mormons working in and around Microsoft. While something like caffeinated drinks can be overlooked, something as potent and mind-altering as alcohol is a spit in the face of the Mormon employees.

    There is no doubt that some pressure was brought to bear against management when this pub was announced, and though it hasn't been publicized, the Washington state Mormon leaders have been visiting the campus to lobby against the pub.

    It sucks for the people who own and work at the pub, but in a silently ultra-religious state like WA, it's no surprise that on of the largest local employers bows to the commands of the puppet masters.

    1. Re:Sad reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Uh. Well, that might be true, but I don't think so. I have lived in Redmond all my life - all 20 years, and I have only met one Mormon - and he wasn't that religious either.

    2. Re:Sad reality by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No idea if that is true or not (I don't even live in the same country), but if so it's a most egregious case of screwing the majority to appease a vocal minority.

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    3. Re:Sad reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately very true.

    4. Re:Sad reality by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It sucks for the people who own and work at the pub, but in a silently ultra-religious state like WA, it's no surprise that on of the largest local employers bows to the commands of the puppet masters.

      Yeah right, puppet masters? What kind of conspiracy are you trying to push around here? A quick search around the net shows only about 3% of Washingtonians are Mormons. You really think the Mormons can push Microsoft around? I'd like to see some real evidence of that. For what it's worth (probably not much) you can be alcohol in gas stations and grocery stores even in Utah.

      No, this is another case of someone getting screwed out of a partnership with Microsoft. They weren't the first, they won't be the last. If you go into a partnership in any way with Microsoft, make sure you have the contract nailed down, and nothing is left to trust. Because if they can get an extra dollar from screwing you over, they will. You may say this is flamebait, but it is true: there is a long list of companies who have gone down because of underestimating the dangers of doing business with Microsoft.

      --
      Qxe4
    5. Re:Sad reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And someone is modding down anyone who agrees with you.

    6. Re:Sad reality by gringofrijolero · · Score: 5, Funny

      Good Mormons know the 10 commandments, one of which is "Though shalt not Judge...".

      Which one is that? Were you privy to the entire set?

      --
      Todos mis movimientos están friamente calculados
    7. Re:Sad reality by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most companies don't have bars on their campus. There could be a ton of reasons they switched their opinion. But suddenly coming out and saying the mormons are now the master of Microsoft is ridiculous.

      Microsoft isn't a single entity, the company didn't have a change of heart, it was some small division of Microsoft who was in charge, and they thought it was a good idea until someone higher up cancelled it. Did mormon influence cause that higher up to make the change? If you have proof I'll believe you, but until now it sounds like an empty rumor. But that's way different than saying Mormons own Microsoft.

      --
      Qxe4
    8. Re:Sad reality by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Maybe "puppetmasters" was a bit strongly phrased, but there is no secret here. I don't have any specific information because I do not work for MS. I only know people who do and I don't want to pose any risk to them for telling me what they know.

      This, like many things that go on behind closed doors, is simply not apparent because it hasn't been publicized. Now, if you ask me to vouch for what I've been told, then we're at a standstill, because I can only tell you that I believe them because I don't have any reason not to.

    9. Re:Sad reality by hughk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most companies don't have bars on their campus. There could be a ton of reasons they switched their opinion. But suddenly coming out and saying the mormons are now the master of Microsoft is ridiculous.

      Smaller companies not, but if you are big enough to have a sports and social club, then you often have a bar. There is a reason for this, a beer or two in a convivial atmosphere loosens tongues, and you don't want people talking shop in front of every Tom, Dick or Harry.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    10. Re:Sad reality by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What can't Mormons do?

      Use logic and common sense.

    11. Re:Sad reality by Spasemunki · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fool! You've bought the oldest trick in the book, the 'blame the Mormons' line. I've heard through private sources that most Microsoft execs are actually vampires Jehova's Witnesses and are worried that alcohol consumption would dilute the blood volume they need for their artificial blood cloning experiments. All of Microsoft's purported 'software development' is just a front for establishing a solid breeding stock in the Seattle area so that the vampires can repopulate the Earth when the Conflicker virus finally triggers in 2012. Think you can prove me wrong? Then answer this: if Microsoft is really a software company why is their operating system such rubbish?

      We're through the looking glass, people.

    12. Re:Sad reality by sowth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you are mostly correct in that Mormons weren't the only influence for MS higher ups to drop the pub. However, I don't doubt this guy's story at all. LDS leaders and organized groups in their religion are always trying to establish their religious beliefs as the law of the land. Screw the Constitution I guess, unless it benefits them.

      Just look at the California gay marriage issue:

      Note this is people in Idaho and Utah trying to influence an election in California. I can tell you, if people in California tried to influence an election or legislation in Utah, they'd be going apeshit about it. For the next 10, or perhaps 100 years they'd be whining and complaining to anyone who'd listen that people in California were trying to persecute and oppress them.

      I live in Idaho,and just last week, I heard an offensive ad on the radio denouncing some stimulus bill because it relaxes the number of alcohol permits. I wonder who paid for this ad? The ad was claiming alcohol causes "crime" and all sorts absurd crap. Methinks the US has just as many religious zealots as they do in the Middle East. If someone doesn't believe in religious freedom, what are they doing in this country?

    13. Re:Sad reality by Anders · · Score: 5, Funny

      Good Mormons know the 10 commandments, one of which is "Though shalt not Judge...".

      And what is the other one?

    14. Re:Sad reality by Hollovoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      He meant morons, honest spelling mistake.

      --
      Im ok..
    15. Re:Sad reality by AGMW · · Score: 3, Funny

      Look, all I said was that this bit of hallibut was good enough for jehova!

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    16. Re:Sad reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Um, it actually is true. I grew up LDS, although not active now. Someone who grew up LDS can see the little signs of Mormonism - CTR rings, Families are Forever stickers, the outline of the special garments that Mormons wear underneith steet cloths, etc. The fantastic health benefits for the entire family are a huge incentive for folks with large families. I work at MS, and know a large number of people who are LDS.

  4. Bars are a business and a meeting place by aristotle-dude · · Score: 4, Insightful
    How is a pub not consistent with business? Many business deals/contacts are made in pubs. It could be a great place for employees to relax on a Friday afternoon after a successful product launch, oh wait, this is Microsoft. Well they could always give out free beer to console employees and boost morale.

    I see nothing wrong with employees being able to hang out after hours and maybe even some informal brainstorming could take place. Way to not think differently MSFT. How very boring and corporate America of you.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    1. Re:Bars are a business and a meeting place by SerpentMage · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No this is AMERICA....

      Whereas in Europe you can head over to a pub to relax and chit chat, in AMERICA (and English Canada) it is completely frowned upon.

      I know whenever I am stateside and I order a beer I am completely out of the norm!

      BUT yet when it comes to drinking while I sip my beer the others get piss drunk, do idiotic things, and generally make a complete a** out of themselves.

      This begs the question, is the pub the problem? Or the fact that the culture in this respect has its head up its a**.

      BTW I am European, grew up in North America, but now have been living in Europe for 15 years. And while Europeans have their oddities, this aspect of English North American life is really screwed...

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    2. Re:Bars are a business and a meeting place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microsoft doesn't have an "after hours." If you're not a 20%er you're putting in 80-100 hours a week, and thinking about how to get ahead the other 89-109. It's a great place to work if you got in while they were in growth mode because when you fall down your options were worth Millions. Now that they're in Monopoly mode? Not so much. But they still will work you till you fall down. I'm surprised we don't see more stories about employees going postal. I guess to go postal you've got to have some energy left in you.

    3. Re:Bars are a business and a meeting place by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How is a pub not consistent with business?

      My boss got fired after he walked past his secretary and she smelled alcohol on his breath and reported that as sexual harassment. From beer. His friends took him out for his birthday during lunch.

      The company didn't want to chance it. So welcome to America. Home of the free (to sue for every stupid little thing).

      Perhaps this was what MS thought about. Personally, I think America has a relationship with alcohol that's beyond fucked up. Ever notice how the bars in some states (I hesitate to say all) have no windows/small windows and then with the shades pulled down? Welcome to the land where the Puritans settled. And no, those attitudes never went away completely.

    4. Re:Bars are a business and a meeting place by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My boss got fired after he walked past his secretary and she smelled alcohol on his breath and reported that as sexual harassment. From beer. His friends took him out for his birthday during lunch.

      ROFL. OK, let's hear her version of the story now.

    5. Re:Bars are a business and a meeting place by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A lot of people in Europe won't admit that the UK is in Europe and a lot of people in the UK claim not to be part of Europe so it's not really fair to paint all of Europe with the same brush.

    6. Re:Bars are a business and a meeting place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is a level in business where alcohol is anathema to business - in customer facing roles, on the manufacturing line, driving, operating heavy equipment are examples of this.

      There's a level where it's an essential lubricant - high level sales, conventions, customers who offer it to salesmen. At the highest level of business alcohol is just one of many refreshments available when your host asks, "What are you having?" Whether or not it's appropriate depends mostly on who you are and where you are.

      In workspaces overseen by the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, there are certain activities that impact your "risk level" and so affect your "premiums" and this would be one of those things. Reducing risk for workers is their job, and they take it serious. They might even shut down your plant for boozing it up on the job. That would have some serious impacts on the release schedule for Vista SP2, AKA "7", so Microsoft dare not risk it publicly. But the tapizzle is still under rack sixle if you get my inferizzle, and if you're dub debugging, Mitch still has the "boulder" to get you over that compiler bump.

    7. Re:Bars are a business and a meeting place by itsdapead · · Score: 4, Informative

      Saying the UK is not part of Europe is like saying Hawaii is not part of the US.

      Not true, politically speaking. The USA is a federal republic. The European Union is a free trade agreement between supposedly sovereign nations in the process of surreptitiously morphing into a federal republic in the hope that nobody will notice. In the EU, you don't use the 'f' word unless you want a political scandal.

      For added spice, several of the member countries are ex-colonial superpowers who, historically (at least since the end of the Roman Empire), have had closer ties with Asia, Africa and the New World than their European neighbors.

      Not that the states of the USA are particularly homogenous, but if and when the United States of Europe emerges it will be a very different animal.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    8. Re:Bars are a business and a meeting place by Like2Byte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not that business class American's have some taboo about drinking alcohol while at lunch - it's more about having to drive back to work after you've had said alcohol. That is a major concern. Europeans, having so many other forms of transportation at their disposal, probably don't consider this fact as they cajole us Americans as they wait for their next stop on the line. Driving is essential in the US to work, live and play.

      I worked at a company, here in the states, where we drank alcohol during lunch all the time - with our bosses present. Sadly, and here's where I agree with you, most companies here in the US frown on people coming back to work with the slightest amount of alcohol on their breath because companies are afraid of being sued because someone drank and got hurt while on the job. So, yes, people will refrain from drinking even at lunch out of fear of losing their job. Can you blame them?

      As for lumping all American's as "uncultured drinkers", heh, I'm sure many a limey has his or her drinking problem. People are people all over the world - don't be so sanctimonious about people's use of alcohol here in the states. Most business class people I know you'd probably enjoy a conversion with over a beer either at lunch or after hours. We're not all drunks! ;)

      Now, I will agree that typical bars in the US are simply dives - places for people to get piss drunk. Anyone whose ever gone out on a Friday/Saturday night in the US knows what I'm talking about. I'd take a European pub over an American bar any day. When I was in Scotland, I went to more than a few pubs (Rose Street, Edinburgh, anyone?) and was so impressed with UK bars.

  5. I guess by Norsefire · · Score: 4, Funny

    It seemed like a good idea until they read the last two panels.

    1. Re:I guess by Vegeta99 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Funny, that graph is the same graph for my ability to bring a girl back to the apartment!

  6. Re:MS Screws it's partner. News at 11. by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My thoughts exactly. Just another form of expression of a basic truth. The fact that a key investor was a former Microsofter only makes this a little sweeter. Consider the words of the great philosophers Mr. T and Nelson.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  7. Tyranny of the Minority over the Majority by MrMista_B · · Score: 5, Informative

    Thanks, Mormons.

    No, not really.

    Not flamebait either - local Mormon leaders have been quite vigorously, though quietly, campaigning against the pub, and, apparantly, successfully. Assholes.

  8. Just a question. by palegray.net · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm all for putting a pub in anywhere, including an existing pub (imagine an infinite series of pubs...). That said, does Google have any pubs on their campuses? Honest question, really.

  9. Corporate Stupid in a Nutshell by Sarusa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Boy if this isn't Office Space and every boneheaded corporate move ever in a nutshell. Hey let's do something nice for out employees, they're adults who will enjoy this and can have a beer without getting completely drunk and making asses of themselves at work (or we'll fire them, that's fair). Then a lawyer takes a look at it, says you know this looks like it might be fun and actionable, and god knows we don't have any money - better cancel it.

    So you end up five times worse than never even having planned it in the first place, because you got everyone's hopes up and now you look like stupid jackasses. But your asses are covered, so all is right with the world! And this is why we pay all you stupid CEOs and MBAs the big bucks, to be dithering asswipes who lead by windsock.

  10. The contract clearly states... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the bar fails for any reason, including Microsoft killing it, Microsoft gets all their intellectual property. A deal's a deal.

    Just like Sendo on phones.

    One wonders if after all these years and this many examples: if the lawyers of Microsoft's potential partners aren't carefully reading the contracts and advising their clients with due diligence, what's in that failure for those lawyers? It could not be possible that Microsoft subverts the legal counsel of their abuse targets first, could it? That would be unethical and unfair. Oh, wait...

  11. Justifications by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Funny

    Justification for a pub: Google doesn't have one.

    Justification for pulling the plug on the pub: Google doesn't have one.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  12. The perfect solution by Lost+Found · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They just need to send management to the pub... let them occupy their time with darts and vomit while the engineers work on fixing their operating system.

  13. Re:I think its a bad move on Microsofts part... by hughk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One of the nastiest bits of code that I wrote after a four rather strong beer lunch. It was in the early days of graphics when we had a DEC VT11, vector graphic display where we had to draw the screen within the phosphor decay time so it didn't flicker. Typically you would have a sequence of instructions for the graphic controller and then you interrupted the CPU which would do cleverer things. The problem was that every cycle spend in the interrupt code, the phosphor was decaying and it limited the number of things we could draw as the CPU was involved every time we drew a new component on the screen.

    In the pub, I just thought "Sod it" and shaved a few cycles by having self modifying code. Ugly as hell and hard to maintain but it meant we could display more on the screen.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  14. Re:Boring by hughk · · Score: 5, Funny

    What about the Progress Bar?

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. Microsoft has an "Australia" problem by symbolset · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Time was when England exiled their most violent felons to an island continent penal colony half a world away. Over time the definition for "violent felon" slid from rapist and murderer to pirate, then to treasonous conspirator, and so on until they landed at political dissident. For many years they exported these folk, only to discover later that this was their best and brightest; their free thinkers, their engineers artists and inventors, the folk who were brighter than their superiors. And what were left were Lords and serfs.

    So now Australia breeds a more vital breed of men, having been selected from that filter, and England has lost control of them.

    Such is as it is with Microsoft. Microsoft has bought into the theory that the top 20% of workers contribute 80% of the work that they've lost sight of how fungible those metrics are. Their 20%ers are folk who threaten the established structure, who are smarter than their bosses, who have scary ideas. It's only right that they migrate from there to Google. Google is Microsoft's Australia.

    And no, I've never worked for Microsoft or Google and I still don't and I doubt that I would barring dire circumstance or rude incentive.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  17. Which Washington do you live in? by TiggertheMad · · Score: 3, Informative

    The unspoken reality at Microsoft is that there is a large minority of Mormons working in and around Microsoft. While something like caffeinated drinks can be overlooked, something as potent and mind-altering as alcohol is a spit in the face of the Mormon employees.

    Wait, what are you smoking? There aren't that many Mormons in the Seattle or east side area on the whole, and nobody cares what they think about drinking. When I worked at MS, the Muslims had a more visible presence (they had a prayer room), and nobody cared about offending them when the Friday beer parties rolled around.

    but in a silently ultra-religious state like WA

    Again, Huh? For the most part, Washington pretty liberal in religious terms, but the few religious conservatives we have are not silent. Just ask MS about their good friend Rev Hutcherson and his famous anti-gay MS boycots.

    I find it rather hard to believe that MS would cave to any religious group after the local PR fiasco that resulted in the whole Hutcherson affair.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  18. Re:From a "good" mormon -- by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's way more likely that the decision to can the bar came from the attempt to get public bail out money to build a bridge connecting two campuses that has a highway dividing them.

    MS is already being criticized for not needing the funding because they make more then enough to build it themselves, now think about the public backlash if Obama or whoever does reward MS and they announce the opening of their on campus bar. It would be like what we have already seen with businesses having meeting at high dollar vacation resorts or flying private jets to Washington to beg for money and so on.

    In the state of Washington, you need permits and licenses to sell alcohol. If the mormons or any religious organization was apposed to the pub, we would have known when they objected to the purchasing of the permits and licenses. The GP is just expressing fear of religion or a disdain for a certain brand of religion. I noticed where he believes what someone else told him without questioning it so he may be the victim of someone else in that boat.

  19. Microsoft's new method of delivering evil! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are completely missing the point. According to the story, they contracted with someone to do a lot of work and waited until he was almost finished to tell him they didn't want what he did. No contract terms can change the fact of that being abusive.

    Before software was Microsoft's method of delivering evil (in my opinion). Now Microsoft top managers are apparently investigating other delivery methods.

  20. Did you need WGA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Every time you wanted a drink, or a pretzel, or a peanut, or to use the bathroom did you have to pass an annoying Windows Genuine Advantage check?

  21. That was unexpected... by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...time and time again I have heard how various people and businesses who have "partnered up" with Microsoft for various projects were screwed by Microsoft in various ways. I recall things like a phone maker who developed some stuff for Microsoft and then Microsoft caused and created some condition where the phone maker was in breach of contract and then Microsoft claimed all the IP for themselves leaving this other company out to dry. There are lots of other stories where Microsoft screwed people and businesses on deals as well. The lesson that nobody ever learns is NOT to trust Microsoft.

    But usually, you hear about Microsoft deals going bust harming other tech businesses... not things like this! But it is still more of the same. Someone changes their mind and "poof!" it's all gone.

  22. Re:Alcohol "causing" crime by iansmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I could, I'd live in a dry county. It drives away the people who need to have intoxicants to survive.

    Yeah... when the US made alcohol illegal in the 1920s all the drinkers just moved to Canada. It certianly didn't suddenly make a large percentage of the population criminals, divert tons of resources and money to enforce it, and of course it didn't make the mob rich.

    I think you need to move out of your neighborhood into a nice gated community that doesn't allow those pesky lower class people in.

    For the record, I don't drink.

  23. Re:Spot the inconsistency? by ciggieposeur · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Para. 1: "... alcohol is anathema to business - in customer facing roles ..."

    Para. 2: "... essential lubricant - high level sales, conventions, customers who offer it to salesmen."

    You don't think we have a fundamental inconsistency here? I'm not poking fun at the poster, but at business mores.

    Simple: one set of customers contains rich people, the other does not. Rich people can drink under any circumstance.