Slashdot Mirror


Lobby Groups Launch Full Assault For Canadian DMCA

An anonymous reader writes "Bill C-61, the previous attempt at a Canadian DMCA, may have failed, but it is clear that the music, movie, and business software industries are engaged in putting massive pressure on the Canadian government to bring it back. Lobbying records show several meetings each week with Government Ministers for CRIA, CMPDA, and Microsoft over the past month. Meanwhile, the CRIA is preparing a grassroots campaign in support of new copyright laws, even claiming that the current rules are costing jobs to truck drivers delivering CDs and DVDs."

135 comments

  1. Truck Drivers? by RandomChars · · Score: 1

    I thought that distribution was supposed to be moving towards being done over the net anyways. Tough to say if new copyright laws will be able to be pushed through anyways right now, what with the minority government and all right now.

    1. Re:Truck Drivers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides which, what costs truck drivers jobs are the fucking RECESSION that recently hit the world. Saying it's due to copyright is fucking insane. I know for a fact that stricter copyright laws will NOT be saving any jobs in the trucking industry.

    2. Re:Truck Drivers? by palegray.net · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I woke up this morning and ate a piece of toast. Five people simultaneously died in Japan. Eating toast kills Japanese people.

      In all seriousness, technology marches on. The number of folks earning a living building horse drawn carriages dropped off sharply with the advent of mass-produced automobiles.

    3. Re:Truck Drivers? by mercosmique · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I hail from Saskatchewan, Canada. The general public here (farmers) could be gullible enough to believe that those newfangled bit-torrent do-hickeys are contributing to the trucking industry's troubles.

    4. Re:Truck Drivers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Yea all 10 of em are a concern.

    5. Re:Truck Drivers? by jcr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know for a fact that stricter copyright laws will NOT be saving any jobs in the trucking industry.

      Well, shipping bits pressed into plastic disks on the highways in trucks certainly requires more truckers than delivering those same bits over the net, but the point here is that truckers hauling disks around are a misallocation of transportation capabilities. You can't ship lumber and washing machines over the net, so it makes more sense for truckers to be hauling those goods instead.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    6. Re:Truck Drivers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Piracy is what happens off the coast of Somalia. The entertainment industry even went as far to PROMOTE real piracy as being "cool" with the Johnny Depp movies!

      2. Record companies and movie studios can take an old product, release an "anniversary" special edition and slap a new copyright date on it. IE: A reissue of U2's first album will say "P&C 2008 Universal-Island Records", thus extending the copyright FOREVER if they wanted.

      3. CD/Downloads/DVD/BluRay etc cost too much. $20 for a CD? $26 for a DVD? 99Â for an MP3? TOO MUCH! $40 for Changeling on BlueRay? Screw THAT! Lower the price to somewhere near REALITY and you might see customers come back...

      4. ...if you already haven't alienated them with high prices, dickish moves with DRM (we haven't forgotten you, EMI and Sony, you GREEDY JACKALS). DRM on DVDs/BluRay is ASSININE!

      5. Most, if not ALL albums and movies that end up available for free on the internet are sourced from promo copies sent to journalists. I see TONS of albums ahead of release dates this way. Same with movies - it was a Fox employee or person under contract to Fox that leaked the Wolverine movie! And Fox wants the downloaders to be sued! SUE THE UPLOADER! I'd like that - Fox sues one of its own for "stealing" a movie. Ha!

      6. Bottomline: prices are too high, DRM must stop and, most importantly, the record companies (Warner, EMI, Sony and Universal) and the movie studios have lost ANY goodwill they might have had to bargain with. Being dicks to your customers will NOT save you.

      7. $20 for a CD? I mean, COME ON!

    7. Re:Truck Drivers? by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thank god no Americans died because of your toast, or you'd be a terrorist!

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    8. Re:Truck Drivers? by Delkster · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and as we all know, the Internet is not a big truck.

    9. Re:Truck Drivers? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Especially the bulky boxes and advertising that go with those disks. And especially when the first few patches are actually _larger_ than the original disks.

      I would love to see all game and software distribution restricted to standard CD case size, just for enironmental reasons. I can see having a recyclable plastic case to protect it, but who needs those artifically long DVD boxes?

    10. Re:Truck Drivers? by erroneus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If these people are having THAT many meetings with government officials, they aren't talking about whether or not it will happen, but HOW it will happen.

      It must be stopped. A TV campaign must be put on the air stating what happened in the U.S. and how it was passed and that the same law had failed in Canada but they haven't given up. People need to know what demon they are attempting to give birth to and how it harms the people.

    11. Re:Truck Drivers? by Silvrmane · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm from Saskatchewan, Canada, and there is no way we would believe the trucker's woes are caused by a drop in CD and DVD sales. We all know it's the atheists, causing a decreased demand for bibles. Simple when you think about it.

    12. Re:Truck Drivers? by jcgf · · Score: 1

      If less than 6 Americans died you ain't doing toast properly. Just got back from Williston this morning after managing to pick up 11 last night. I would have had 15 but the other 4 passed the exam (one surprised me as I didn't think she was going to figure out the last derivative but I guess she remembered her product rule in the last 10 minutes of the session - surprised the hell out of me which I mentioned during my speech at the graduation ceremonies).

      Anyways, to bring this post back on topic, I think these are just a bunch of whiny assholes that are all bitchy that we're heading south of the border to get our entertainment. They deserve all of the disdain they get. Yes, Rush and BTO were awesome, but just look at some of the crap they've given us since:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_hip_hop
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYnhTC7vdv0

      Speaking of entertainment, take a look at this:
      http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/04/16/texas-governor-says-secession-possible/
      When they start casting, I'm going to audition to play a Confederate telegraph operator (it's a minor roll - no speaking but I nod a lot when Mel Gibson's character speaks to me and you can listen to me send what he says). The director told me that he hopes Fox will put us next to American Dad.

    13. Re:Truck Drivers? by lytfyre · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm from Saskatchewan, Canada, and somehow we have the only ISP in Canada not thoroughly devoted to screwing the customer. Who would have thought that a government owned telecom would actually end up LESS scummy than the commercial alternatives?

    14. Re:Truck Drivers? by gwait · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are far fewer CDs being solde these days,
      therefore less truck drivers are needed to ship them.

      Blame Brittany Spears, Blame ITunes.

      What an inane argument by a clueless government.
      Shipping data digitally is so much more cost effective, cheaper, lowers gas consumption (which both lowers emissions, and the pressure on the price of gas).

      If the government actually wants to help the citizens who (barely) voted them in, they should ban the physical shipment of anything that could otherwise be sent digitally.

      But no, they are clearly in the sway of the media megacorps (none of which are Canadian) for some unknown reason (kickbacks) that they plan to set Canada back years to protect an obsolete business model.

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    15. Re:Truck Drivers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's the issue you're concerned about, remember that the majority of record/dvd stores still have to stock the weekly new releases the same as before. So what I meant as the grandparent note, is that DVD/CD deliveries haven't changed too much over the years since the end work for the trucking industry remains constant so long as there's record stores to deliver to. (They still have to deliver their weekly shipments to each retail store, whether it's a 1lb shipment or a 20lb shipment.)

      Record stores however are going out of business because they have to compete with Wal-mart however. Wal-mart doesn't sell all the harder-to-find-non-blockbuster stuff, but they sell all the new mainstream releases that sell a lot of copies cheaper than stand-alone record shops can afford to sell them. This puts them out of business since everyone then goes to Wal-mart to save that extra dollar or three on a popular new release, and there's not enough people that will be looking for the rarer stuff to keep a store open.

      Add to this legal sales for those rarer titles are eating up further profits, which allow more record companies to fail. This is not due tocopyright infringement at ALL. As more of those companies fail, there's no longer that weekly shipment to make. Strengthening copyright won't bring any of those stores back, nor will it stop the Wal-mart effect from killing more.

    16. Re:Truck Drivers? by Patch86 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You inadvertently bring up another good point, too.

      If internet piracy means less trucks on the road, does that make internet piracy environmentally friendly? Would encouraging piracy help Canada fulfil its G20 green commitments?

    17. Re:Truck Drivers? by jcr · · Score: 1

      Just so you know, yor username is above the text of your post

      Newb,

      I've been signing my posts since my FIDONET days, and I'm not going to stop because some AC kid on /. gets snotty about it.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    18. Re:Truck Drivers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the government actually wants to help the citizens who (barely) voted them in, they should ban the physical shipment of anything that could otherwise be sent digitally.

      Really? ...really?

  2. Lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lawyers, lawyers everyehre.

    1. Re:Lawyers by Scamwise · · Score: 3, Funny

      I say they should encourage piracy to make sure the lawyers always have work.

      Mind you if I have to choose between truck drivers and lawyers...

      --
      Sam "to lazy to register" Look
  3. Jobs by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    even claiming that the current rules are costing jobs to truck drivers delivering CDs and DVDs.

    You know what costs jobs? Technological change -- it's a good thing.

    1. Re:Jobs by davester666 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But the tubes have to go a longer way here in Canada, so the cable and telephone monopolies naturally made them smaller. That's why we have bandwidth caps. That's why we still need truck drivers to deliver physical media!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:Jobs by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fuck! Time to burn all those computers to ensure more accountant, science, mathmatics, physics, secretarial jobs don't get "lost".

    3. Re:Jobs by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Funny

      See... you backwards Canadians. They made the tubes out of metal, didn't they? They could have made the tubes smaller, and made them out of glass. Glass tubes are more slippery and let the packets go through faster.

      Though I admit that a moose could probably do more damage stumbling over a glass tube than a metal one.

    4. Re:Jobs by Naturalis+Philosopho · · Score: 5, Funny

      Technological change is most definitely not a good thing. Those stinking truck drivers and their trucks have ruined my career as a stage coach driver!

    5. Re:Jobs by skreeech · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've met people from accounting firms who have paperless offices. Computers probably increased employment in accounting because more could be done at reasonable cost.

      --
      [20:36] wwwdot/.dotorg
    6. Re:Jobs by EdIII · · Score: 2, Funny

      Glass tubes are more slippery and let the packets go through faster.

      Don't forget that they need to be straight, or on a very gradual curve. Otherwise the 1's and 0's can start clogging up the tubes, especially if its looped.

    7. Re:Jobs by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      You stage coach drivers and your fancy wheels! I had a perfectly good career delivering CDs on a mule.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    8. Re:Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On an e-mule?

    9. Re:Jobs by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      You did leave out the most important part: ...because it creates even more new jobs.

      People think that closing down companies with outdated business models only destroys jobs. But they never seem to see, that in nature, available resources always are used again quickly. Someone else will fill the whole. Pressure equalizes. And the people will find work again. And sometimes, wonderful things happen too. Like someone of those people having the time and motivation to start his own successful company with something completely new, and filling the gap with it.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    10. Re:Jobs by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Well, now you can get your job back. With an eMule-Server. ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    11. Re:Jobs by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Whooosh...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    12. Re:Jobs by andy.ruddock · · Score: 1

      Blimey, that was cheap, think I'll have my accounts done again!

      --
      God: An invisible friend for grown-ups.
    13. Re:Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think skreeech didn't "get" Merls' joke and wasn't just adding support for his point?

      I think you've prematurely whooshed. There are probably pills for that.

    14. Re:Jobs by gwait · · Score: 1

      Actually our tubes are made from hollowed out pine beetle infested logs, so they tend to leak bits on the ground.

      Unfortunately those bits have combined with woodbugs and become self aware..

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    15. Re:Jobs by canuck57 · · Score: 1

      Technological change is most definitely not a good thing. Those stinking truck drivers and their trucks have ruined my career as a stage coach driver!

      Then become a politician! Heck, $200,000 a year partially tax free with an expense account that isn't quoestion too much. You even get the air miles! You want a riding on the Westjet route, nicer looking ladies. Even has job security and pension is only 6 years and government backed. Maybe a little cash extra under the table too. And you can use CCRA to find out where to hide your money from the tax man. Get good inside investment tips to from Goodale.

      A dream job...

    16. Re:Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what's worse, just think of all the jobs lost later trucking the packing material and discarded CDs into the landfills! What a shame!

  4. Simple fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Simple fix: faster broadband, then re-train the DC truck drivers into hard disk truck drivers.

    1. Re:Simple fix by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      And soon they will transport solid state disks instead.

      The catch with copyright laws is that the amount of fair use seems to be cut down bit by bit for every new release.

      I'm still of the opinion that there shall be limitations on copyright:

      • Copyright to expire five years after the creator's death.
      • Copyright can only be held by creator as a person, not by a company and never be transferred to another person.
      • If you organize a religion you shall not be able to claim copyright on any works related to the religion.
      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Simple fix by endymion.nz · · Score: 1

      I think you should amend your last point. If you organise a religion, and claim tax relief, you should not be able to claim copyright on works related to the religion. I don't give a fuck if some nutjob wants to copyright their cult texts but it becomes a different story when they are receiving government subsidy.

      --
      mediocrity rules, man
    3. Re:Simple fix by mpe · · Score: 1

      I'm still of the opinion that there shall be limitations on copyright:
      * Copyright to expire five years after the creator's death.


      How about 5 years after first publication subject to depositing an unencrypted copy with any applicable copyright libraries. "Starting the clock" with the creator's death has all sorts of problems like what happens where there is more than one "creator" as well as even finding out when someone dies (especially if they used a alias).

      * Copyright can only be held by creator as a person, not by a company and never be transferred to another person.

      Who's the creator of a pop song, the composer, the lyric writer, singer(s), musician(s), producers, etc? Ditto for a movie...

    4. Re:Simple fix by alelade · · Score: 1

      what happens where there is more than one "creator" as well as even finding out when someone dies (especially if they used a alias).

      Simple, we make co-creators expire with them. We can even supply them with toll free suicide booths, or hunt them, charge them with hunting fee, then expire them should they not choose to use our patent pending boots.

  5. I say lets cut off their content... by Wacky_Wookie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If these media companies keep this shit up, I think a lot of creative people will stop providing them with content.

    It would be fun to form a mass co-op type business, pool everyone's cash and buy up as many band contracts as possible just to keep them off the major labels.

    1. Re:I say lets cut off their content... by what+about · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But thanks to copyright extended to more than a life after the artist death, RIAA will enjoy money anyway.

      However, I think that the only way to wake up the "common person" to the current abuse of copyright by RIAA is for RIAA to be even more abusive.
      History tell us that only after tyrants have done truly outrageus act then the people will stand up, not earlier (unfortunately).

      Enjoy your music :-)

    2. Re:I say lets cut off their content... by sumdumass · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, it's not the media companies.

      The problem is that the last two WIPO treaties require DMCA style laws. Pretty much any country that doesn't implement those will end up being passed over in other crap that the international community does. It will hurt trade and cause financial issues.

      The American DMCA provisions are more or less taken straight from the requirements of the WIPO Copyright Treaty or WTC and the WPPT or WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty with the exception of penalties and a few extremes. Canada signed onto both of the treaties on 12/22/1997. Focusing on the media companies will only result in disappointed losses in the fight. You need to get the government (your local government as well as other country's governments) to change the treaties and international obligations to them to reflect the will of your people.

      You or I or anyone can complain about Disney or Warner bros or whatever. They are as powerful as they are in this fight because they are attempting to get the governments of countries to make good on treaties that almost all countries in the world have signed an obligation to. It's the reason that the pirate bay just got into trouble, it's the reason why their laws are being changed and why charges were being brought against a group of people on the behalf of people and corporations that most likely don't even have offices in the country.

      Sure, keep believing media corps are evil. I'm not asking you or anyone else to embrace them. I'm asking people to actually pay attention to where this crap is coming from so that we don't dick around with seemingly related issues that end up being a dead end. The treaties need to be adjusted-changes-destroyed-whatever before this threat goes away. When I can say Canada or any other country has to pass a law because a treaty they signed obligated them to, no matter how much it looks like I am the bad guy, I'm more or less only reminding those countries of their obligations.

      It would be fun to form a mass co-op type business, pool everyone's cash and buy up as many band contracts as possible just to keep them off the major labels.

      While it would be fun, that's all it would be "for fun". Or at least until the right crap was changed out. Even if "big media" had no clients, they could/would still push for the treaties to be implemented.

    3. Re:I say lets cut off their content... by Lloyd_Bryant · · Score: 1

      Actually, there's nothing wrong with the treaties. The issue is with the implementation of the laws by the governments.

      For instance, the U.S. DMCA would be a reasonable law, if it actually had some penalties for misuse. As it is, various companies have routinely abused the DMCA (using it for trademarks, sending a new DMCA notice after a counter notice has been filed, etc).

      The *only* penalty for misuse specified in the law is a possible charge of perjury for an attorney - a penalty that will never be applied, unless some lawyer is very high on a U.S. Attorney's shit list.

      Now imagine that the *company* responsible for the DMCA notice could be subject to a substantial penalty every time it misuses that law (preferably a civil remedy, since for criminal penalties we have to wait for the government's attorneys to act).

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I had one once. It sucked.
    4. Re:I say lets cut off their content... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Well, while I agree that the implementation needs work, it's the lack of "direction" the treaties offer and the quality of politicians nowadays generally means we won't get much more then they have to give. That does mean laws like the DMCA that doesn't really consider abuse.

      Anyways, the treaties could clear a lot of the issues we are seeing up with a well rounded minimum set of "fair use" or "fair dealings" guidelines that allow for the environment to exist in which we see a lot of the abuses. Seriously, if the DMCA actually said Parody, sampling, fixing broken DRM or outdated technologies, using hardware for purposed other then what the manufacturer intended, and any tech designed to do that without creating an copyright infringement was acceptable, would there be so many people upset over it? Would there be that many abuses? Now if this was written into the treaty, then the laws they make would/could reflect that. The DMCA should reflect that.

      As for the abused, there actually is more then just perjury that can be done. And the perjury in the slip that they certify isn't a "your breaking the law if your wrong" it's a "I have reasonable belief that what I claim is accurate". What this means is, if it is my copyright in question and it does turn out that your use is considered "fair use", neither of us are in trouble. But if it's not my copyright and I claim it is to harm you, then I can be charged with perjury. But people overlook the other aspect of that. If I do do something to harm you that is fraudulent, then you can sue me. It doesn't matter if the DMCA law doesn't say you can, what matters is that it doesn't say you cannot.

      Of course that costs money and most wouldn't have enough to play. However, going back to the treaties, if it's worded to catch that, then the laws implemented because of them would reflect it.

      I still believe the place to move is on the treaties. Canada seems to be in a pretty strong position to make a few changes with a lot of Hollywood movies and such being made there because it's cheaper and all. But on a side note, even the US or England or whoever could possible makes the changes. Especially if the people of those countries are behind them.

    5. Re:I say lets cut off their content... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and who lobbied the governments to negotiate and sign those agreements? It sure as hell wasn't the truck driver's union.

    6. Re:I say lets cut off their content... by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      I believe Taiwan has not signed the WIPO treaties and are doing just fine. In fact, they are booming economically. They remain very creative even if they have mastered the art of reproducing originals at a lesser cost (or bootlegging).

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    7. Re:I say lets cut off their content... by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      If this is the case we're even more screwed. I'm sure the same groups of companies represented by the lobbiest have already discussed their reasons to each of the WIPO members that have signed the treaty. Our only opportunity for some sanity in this is to write to our MPs and the Prime Minister to demand fair consume, Internet and technology oriented copyright laws.

      I want more openness in all Canadian government affairs. I want cameras w/ sound - all real time and no editing- of any and all of the 'closed door' meetings between politicians and lobbiests. I'd REALLY be interested in hearing what they have to say and wether there is any opposition in the arguments from the politicians or if they always fully agree. I've always found it too strong a coincidence that whatever the lobbiest lobbies for is exactly what policy most any government decides is the best COA.

    8. Re:I say lets cut off their content... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be fun to form a mass co-op type business, pool everyone's cash and buy up as many band contracts as possible just to keep them off the major labels.

      Why not move to a patronage system where musicians are directly commissioned by the masses to create music. The artist would get money up front, and the world would get to do whatever they wanted with the music once it was released. For smaller name artists there could be mutual fund style investments (specific types of music e.g.) where donations are pooled as you suggested.

      If enough people followed this model the return on the investment need not be more than the release of the music itself. Large investors might get concert bonuses or something. What do you think? Would this cut out the RIAA entirely?

    9. Re:I say lets cut off their content... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call me cynical, but I'd be willing to bet there are quite a few individuals out there who'd be willing to sell their less-than-mediocre works to these content tyrants. When they do, these tyrants will market their content successfully and reap the profits, or hell, just keep remaking and reusing material, much like they've been doing.

      Hopefully, people will just stop doing business with them altogether until their influence(see money) they use over our governments eventually runs out.

    10. Re:I say lets cut off their content... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem isn't the WIPO treaty, the problem is the implementation... The anti-circumvention laws should be tied to distribution. Circumventing a digital lock to enjoy legally purchased digital content should never be illegal. Nor should it be illegal to circumvent to exercise fair use or fair dealing rights. Circumventing to share with my 500 000 friends on Bittorrent however is another issue and circumventing in order to make money without paying the artist is already illegal. No need to change the laws for that.

    11. Re:I say lets cut off their content... by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I honestly don't believethat even after a "truly outrageous act", the people will do anything whatsoever. They will continue to vote for the same people, and let whatever happens... happens. At least I voted for one of the 'non-typical' parties that might not be going along with things so readily. They got zero seats. So my opinions are meaningless to society anyway it seems.

      Not that it matters... I believe all parties will roll over for big-money, regardless of their actual goals and/or stances.

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
    12. Re:I say lets cut off their content... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      It already is. More people in Canada are connected online and get their information from it then watch the TV. It trends even more deeply in the winter when we're not outside and freezing our asses off. Watching hockey or doing some other wintery sport, or sometimes just doing something inside.

      The belief that Canadians will roll over for this are sadly true, unless it affects them directly it won't make too much of a difference. However, small numbers of people can make a large impact. It's getting the citizens to realize that they can make a difference and do what needs to be done.

      I say that as part of that 'small' group of people that managed to get the expansion on broadcast rights for various media outlets into Canada like Fox, Euro-networks and those from the far-east.(As well as the change in CTV-Newsnets broadcast license) While I don't agree with everything broadcast on any of them, I strongly believe that people should have the option to choose whatever the hell they want, not have the government shove it down their throat. And feel free to strongly disagree with them, as well. Debating openly the merits of whatever the hell they see, while screaming over it should they wish. (Oh and I say that as an evil conservative, and member of the CPC. Get the pitchforks!)

      I also believe that people should be against this, write their MP, MPP, Industry Minster and perhaps the heritage minster. I could be missing another but it's already been a long day and I'm tired.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    13. Re:I say lets cut off their content... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Your right. However, is Taiwan attempting to pass DMCA stile laws? Taiwan may be the exception to the observation but look at where they are attempting to implement the laws.

      This is not only interesting but an important note because when we look at who is making laws, or should I say which countries seem to be getting laws shot down with massive outcry of the populous at the last minute, we will see a lot of names who are signatories to the treaties but not enforcing them. Let me list a few along with when they signed and tell me if you can remember any of them recently being talked about.

      United Kingdom 2/13/1997, Switzerland signed in 12/29/1997, ratified the WTC 3/31/2008 and is in force on 7/1/2008, Sweden signed 10/31/1997, Spain signed in 12/20/1996, Russian Federation joined by accession in 11/5/2008 and went into force 2/5/2009, Ireland, Israel and Italy signed in 1996-97, Germany and the EU signed on 12/201996 which ironically is before the US signed onto the treaty (4/12/1997) yet it is often claimed the US is forcing it's laws on other countries over this , Denmark 1997, and Australia joined by accession in April of 2007 with the treaty going into effect in July of the same year.

      Now, I do seem to remember a few of those countries being in the headlines about DMCA style laws in the last few years. Two of them in the last two months. It's a distraction to blame it on Disney or whatever or to even skip the idea of how and why DMCA type laws are spreading because of technical variations in the way I presented my arguments. The treaties are at the root of the spread and they are more then just ancillary attractions to the fair.

      That's the point I wanted to get across. I'm more then happy to be wrong about Taiwan or any other country. The problem is the pattern we are seeing and the pattern is connected to the treaties.

    14. Re:I say lets cut off their content... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Right on.

      However, I just interupted my extended fight with naval gazing and participated in a thought experiment where I looked at some of the countries who have signed onto but not ratified or implemented the WIPO treaties. Look at the contracting parties sections.

      Anyways, the interesting thing is that the US ratified and implemented the DMCA laws pretty early in the game but the EU and countries like England, Germany, Denmark, Sweden, Switzerland, and so on who's population seem to think the US is pushing it's laws on them, actually signed on before the US has, they just haven't ratified it or implemented the laws yet.

      To me, that just shows how much of a driving force the treaties actually are with some countries being more resistant to it then others. Anyways, I thought it was an interesting look into what drives the push of these type of laws.

  6. Global Consumer RIAA needed maybe? by Pyrmontvillage · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe its time for a global over arching consumer group on a par with RIAA, to coordinate a global push back. RIAA and its associated entities besides having the cash have better global coordination. There seem to be disparate consumer type groups that operate country by country, lacking cash and proper media profiles... Just a though anyway

    1. Re:Global Consumer RIAA needed maybe? by iiiears · · Score: 1

      Power follows money spend your dollars wisely.

      --
      15TW = 15,000 Nuclear Reactors. (Approx. one accident a month.)
  7. If truck drivers are losing their jobs.... by Cordath · · Score: 1

    Then maybe the media levy that is currently distributed amongst artists should also be distributed to truckers too?

    Problem solved.

    Long story short, Canada doesn't have a copyright problem. Tweak the levies if you want, but don't blow a good thing. DMCA style laws haven't worked anywhere else they've been implemented. The Canadian levy system shows far more promise. Heck, maybe the U.S. should be adopting our levy system instead of trying to make us adopt their horribly broken and ineffectual laws!

    1. Re:If truck drivers are losing their jobs.... by timmarhy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      the levy system most certainly doesn't work. you end up paying for something you don't want. I, for example don't ever wish to purchase a top 40 cd. but due to the levy system if i purchased a blank cd in canada my money would be funneled directly to the very people i don't want it to even through i've never downloaded anything that belongs to them.

      yes, perfect system indeed.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    2. Re:If truck drivers are losing their jobs.... by Scamwise · · Score: 1

      They should also make sure they guy with the price sticker machine gets his cut, I hate to see him injured by piracy.

      --
      Sam "to lazy to register" Look
    3. Re:If truck drivers are losing their jobs.... by skreeech · · Score: 1

      The blank CDs could be packaged up with a little art and levies(levi?) going to the source that you most like to download. Gotta stay honest though and buy spindle for both your porn and underground music.

      --
      [20:36] wwwdot/.dotorg
    4. Re:If truck drivers are losing their jobs.... by palegray.net · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know if paying an extra tax on recordable media counts as a "system that works."

    5. Re:If truck drivers are losing their jobs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the levy system most certainly doesn't work. you end up paying for something you don't want. I, for example don't ever wish to purchase a top 40 cd. but due to the levy system if i purchased a blank cd in canada my money would be funneled directly to the very people i don't want it to even through i've never downloaded anything that belongs to them.

      yes, perfect system indeed.

      Conversly, after buying blank CDs I remember to go download big label music.

    6. Re:If truck drivers are losing their jobs.... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the biggest problem with this situation is ill/mis informed or the lack of informed people.

      The DMCA laws extend directly from the WPPT and WCT treaties (wipo)and Canada signed them in december of 1997 but hasn't implemented them yet. This is actually where the US originally got the DMCA from too. Now you can argue all you want that the media companies cause the treaties to have the wording and all that, I won't dispute it. The issue currently on the table is that many different countries are obligated to pass something similar to the DMCA and the media companies or the US pushing for it is a symptom not a problem. To cure the illness so to speak is to get the treaties changed so the onligations of countries who signed them are changed too.

    7. Re:If truck drivers are losing their jobs.... by djmurdoch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Signing the treaty doesn't create the obligation, it's ratifying it that does. Canada signed those treaties, but hasn't ratified them. It's like the US position regarding the Kyoto Protocol, or the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: signed, but not ratified, so not bound by the terms of the treaty.

    8. Re:If truck drivers are losing their jobs.... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      The obligation isn't as much ratifying it as it is economic advantages of being party to the treaty. Like I said, your fighting the wrong fights. But hey, don't listen to me and continue griping every 6 months or so when it comes back up again and again because politicians in Canada see it as somehow beneficial to get on board with most of the rest of the world every time the entertainment industry of any country brings it to their attention.

      BTW, I didn't say Canada was obligated to them, I said many other countries were. This puts Canada at a disadvantage on some areas just like Kyoto and the convention on child right, puts Canada or the world court does for the US. You can kill off ever media company in the world and as long as those treaties are there, it will be brought up again and again.

    9. Re:If truck drivers are losing their jobs.... by djmurdoch · · Score: 1

      I, for example don't ever wish to purchase a top 40 cd. but due to the levy system if i purchased a blank cd in canada my money would be funneled directly to the very people i don't want it to even through i've never downloaded anything that belongs to them.

      This is not very accurate. Your money will go to the copyright collective, and be distributed by it. 60% goes to the songwriters and publishers, 23% to Canadian performers, and 17% to Canadian record companies (actually mostly subsidiaries of multinationals). The distribution depends on airplay and sales, so Canadian top 40 artists will get more money than obscure ones, but most of the top 40 performers aren't Canadian, so they'll get none of it. (Whoever owns the rights to their songs will get a share, though.)

      The theory is that copying should roughly match sales, so the fact that the popular artists get more just reflects the fact that there are lots of other people downloading them. Those people with bad taste are the ones whose levies go to the top 40 artists. Yours go to whoever you tend to buy and listen to on the radio.

      Now, if you never buy music, and the radio never plays music you like, then you won't affect the distribution, but most downloaders do actually purchase music too, so they do tend to have an effect on where the money goes. If you're not one of them, you don't really have much right to complain: you're getting the right to download for 0.29 per CD. Seems like a good deal, even if the money doesn't go to people you like.

    10. Re:If truck drivers are losing their jobs.... by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      Heck, I have over 300 CDs. Of those, save for 8 albums from 4 different artists, the rest of my collection is American. Sorry, but Canadian music sucks. Most of the Canadian artists that make it to the top 40 copy the same style as the Americans.

      The overwhelming reason for CANCON and the Levy are, if you buy the story, is to share our 'Canadian culture' with other Canadians and the rest of the world. Can anybody point to me exactly what is "Canadian" about Canadian music? I've yet to see any coherent definition of Canadian culture to date.

       

    11. Re:If truck drivers are losing their jobs.... by gwait · · Score: 1

      You might argue successfully that the way they divide up the money is reasonable, but that doesn't change the fact that it is an unfair tax/welfare system that gives signed musicians special status over other industries in Canada.

      It also presumes guilt on the part of anyone who buys a blank CD, which is also just plain wrong.

      We can chose a path of tax and spend to support obsolete industries and business models, or we could let them die and make way for new business models.

      There is nothing in anyone's charter of rights that says we have to have a world where big media makes millions of dollars from a megastar artist (and usually screws said artist in the process).

      The internet has decentralized information making broadcasting only one method of content distribution, and as a result has wiped out the broadcast industry's ability to control western culture.

      Ask all the teens you know if they even know, never mind care what the radio top 20 songs are.
      Most teens I know have a far more widespread and eclectic taste in music than ever before, and this is a healthy thing.

      The problem is the broadcast media industry still has a lot of cash and they are using it to subvert democracy in every western nation, through massive paid lobbyist efforts, and very likely other means of financial benefit to the politicians involved.

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    12. Re:If truck drivers are losing their jobs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The obligation isn't as much ratifying it as it is economic advantages of being party to the treaty. Like I said, your fighting the wrong fights. But hey, don't listen to me and continue griping every 6 months or so when it comes back up again and again because politicians in Canada see it as somehow beneficial to get on board with most of the rest of the world every time the entertainment industry of any country brings it to their attention.

      Bullshit, the politicians see it as beneficial to get more legalized bribes from lobbyists.

      If they gave two shits about the people and society then Michael Geist would be writing the bill to be voted on not a collection of corporate special interest groups.

      I'm not doubting we need new copyright laws, what I'm doubting is that any copyright law written by a corporate media lobbyist group is going to be good law.

      Copyright law is not inherently bad in of it self. THIS law (c-61 and its spawn) is though!

    13. Re:If truck drivers are losing their jobs.... by djmurdoch · · Score: 1

      It also presumes guilt on the part of anyone who buys a blank CD, which is also just plain wrong.

      Not at all. It presumes that some of those will be *legally* used to make private copies of music.

      Now, this is arguably unfair: some people will buy a bunch of CDRs and use them for things that are completely unrelated to music covered by the private copying right. However, it's not as unfair as it used to be: you can use recordable DVDs now instead, and you don't pay a levy on them.

      But it doesn't really matter, because the levy is on its last legs. I doubt it will survive the next update to the Copyright Act. The fact is that nowadays very little private copying ends up on levied CDs. Most of it ends up in flash memory or on hard drives. Those have so many unrelated uses that it doesn't make sense to levy them. Since the CRIA no longer likes the private copying right (they've even convinced people like you it doesn't exist, and that private copies are illegal), they'll lobby against it, they'll convince people like you to lobby against it, and we'll lose it.

      It's too bad, really. I'll still record music as I always did, but it will soon be illegal when I do it.

    14. Re:If truck drivers are losing their jobs.... by Nulifier · · Score: 1

      The money is spread based on popularity (as far as I know) so you could simply think that all your money goes to the artists that you like, and that the vast majority of people who pirate the top-40 artists are paying into the pool for the top-40 artists.

      As it is just one big pool, you aren't necessarily putting money in their pockets.

      If you want to support more indie artists then simply buy the music directly from them.

  8. You are a bit late. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Informative

    A number of popular names have started doing that already. Nine Inch Nails, Radiohead, and lots more.

    1. Re:You are a bit late. by Wacky_Wookie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, I know, and I think it is a step in the right direction. The thing is that Radiohead, N.I.N. and co. all went through the "system" first. I can't wait till a significant portion of the worlds popular artists have NEVER had a major label contract. Labels may never die completely, but they will be left with the Britney Spears and Jonas Brothers markets only, and even then they really won't care about music sales, as all the profit in that market is merchandise anyway.

      A membership based record store would be interesting, kind of like the old Colombia House mail order thing, put a physical store. Charge a flat-rate for membership, then have the music for sale at 75% off. If you made it so everyone got one free CD a month, I bet a lot of people would pick up a few albums just 'cus they were in the store anyway to get their "Free" CD.

    2. Re:You are a bit late. by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      It's an admirable effort. Unfortunately the industry can always go find the next teen sensation... with a few hundred thousand bucks worth of marketing, they seem to be able to sell anyone's crap these days.

    3. Re:You are a bit late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The John Butler Trio http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Butler_Trio have made No. 1 album in Australia (twice!) on their own record label.

    4. Re:You are a bit late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I found this Jamendo site recently, free music from independant artists...50% of advertising revenue goes to artists and 100% of all donations made.

      Sounds like workable model.

      Will be curious how it all turns out.

    5. Re:You are a bit late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Have you seen www.magnatunes.com?

  9. Huh? Ever heard of the EFF? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    And I bet you haven't contributed anything to them either. Well, get off your butt and go here:

    https://secure.eff.org/site/Donation2?idb=138949259&df_id=1220&1220.donation=form1

    to contribute. The page says "End Warrantless Wiretapping!" but it is actually a membership page. Sign the hell up and give them some money. You are not limited to their fixed amounts, they will take any donation.

    1. Re:Huh? Ever heard of the EFF? by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      This is great advice. I donate what I can every year. If even a tenth of the Slashdot visitor population did the same, I'd feel a lot better about things.

    2. Re:Huh? Ever heard of the EFF? by Pyrmontvillage · · Score: 1

      Erroneous Assumption. I give to the OZ Equivalent, http://www.efa.org.au/ And am heavily involved in Our Current fight against Proposed Internet Censorship Laws...

  10. I admit they are not Canadian... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    but I imagine that if they got enough support from Canadians, they would help there, too. I don't know of any reason why not.

    1. Re:I admit they are not Canadian... by Your.Master · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can definitely think of reasons they wouldn't help in Canada, not the least of which is an entirely different legal framework within which to fight, where the US constitution does not apply and your legal rights are different (greater in some areas, lesser in others).

      But, anyway, they do support a Canadian organization:

      http://www.onlinerights.ca/

      Not formally affiliated but they are more or less the Canadian equivalent. The EFF defends rights in the US constitution which simply do not (legally) apply in Canada. The EFC defends those laid out in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

      That said, both of the organisations come with baggage that is not really related to the RIAA (for example, Warrantless Wiretapping). If you want to support them in opposition to the RIAA, make sure they don't disagree with you on some important principle. This goes generally for any activist or charity cause, but I feel it's important to call out that it's not a single-issue organisation.

    2. Re:I admit they are not Canadian... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      But they don't... at least the EFF doesn't, I don't know about EFC. In any case, the EFF has been staunchly adversarial to the RIAA and just about everything they are doing.

  11. Huh? Don't blame us! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    WE aren't trying to get you to adopt our laws!!! Excuse me, but those are YOUR OWN companies doing that. WE don't like the DMCA any more than you do. It was sneaked past us (or most of us anyway), when we weren't looking.

    And it is true that the DMCA doesn't work worth a damn, except to make things more difficult for the consumer. On the other hand, the levy system (as it has been proposed here, anyway) would not work either, since it collects money from honest people to pay for the activities of dishonest people, and the artists do not get paid either. So, in effect, the money comes from the wrong people and it goes to the wrong people.

    1. Re:Huh? Don't blame us! by gwait · · Score: 1

      I don't blame you, but none of the actual Canadian record companies are for the Canadian version of a DMCA and have come out publicly against it.

      It has been reported that the US trade people basically threatened Canada with a trade war if Canada didn't crack down on the "rampant" piracy in our country. As well, apparently many US professional lobbyists are in Ottawa cozying up to our federal politicians.

      There is very little broadcast or newspaper coverage about it since the traditional Canadian news media is also owned by the same media giants who are promoting this mess.

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    2. Re:Huh? Don't blame us! by Nulifier · · Score: 1

      The US is using various international trade agreements to push its views out in the world around them. So it may not be you personally, but it is the government that you as a country have elected.

  12. Here's an idea... by symbolic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stop funding them. More and more artists are starting to see the light - that even if they give away their new albums online, and make their money via live concerts, they will *still* make more than they are through these usurious contracts they have with Big Media, Inc.

    If people would just stop buying RIAA-produced crap (and stop stealing it!), the problem would eventually solve itself. It's no secret that they'll need to be dragged kicking and screaming back to this thing we all know as 'reality,' but it's gotta happen sooner or later. Right now we're just prolonging the agony for everyone.

    1. Re:Here's an idea... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      If people would just stop buying RIAA-produced crap (and stop stealing it!), the problem would eventually solve itself.

      That doesn't really work. Sure, stop crap releases from artists signed to a RIAA label. But that doesn't stop sales for the good artists signed to RIAA labels, of which there are plenty.

      Do you really mean "stop buying crap and good releases from RIAA-signed artists"?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    2. Re:Here's an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does not work that way. Reason is they the Record, Movies, TV, that is the Recorded Entertainment Industry has two mandates.

      1. Keep sales up.
      2. Find new forms of getting money.

      That number 2 is what I see this Lobbying effort is about. If they could ask us Canadian to pay directly into their bank accounts they would. Come to think of it we do on recording media tax.

      So only answer is to make sure if the law is passed their sales drop to zero and they have to figure out why their warehouses are full of items.

    3. Re:Here's an idea... by mpe · · Score: 1

      If people would just stop buying RIAA-produced crap (and stop stealing it!),

      If a significent number of people did stop buying it then they'd have their lobbiests claim that this was "proof" of piracy to try and get more extreme laws passed.

      the problem would eventually solve itself.

      How much damage will be done before that happens?

    4. Re:Here's an idea... by iiiears · · Score: 1

      Power follows money. make informed purchase for reasons that encompass more than immediate gratification. (Translation:"Buy directly from the artist whenever possible")

      --
      15TW = 15,000 Nuclear Reactors. (Approx. one accident a month.)
    5. Re:Here's an idea... by symbolic · · Score: 1

      Yes, I do. The artists aren't blameless here if they refuse to be part of the solution. They resist this kind of change for the same reason that the RIAA does - they don't want to risk disruption of the money pipeline. At that point I'd have to wonder what their real objective is - to be artistic and create, or to maximize the money they get for doing it.

    6. Re:Here's an idea... by symbolic · · Score: 1

      I see this argument all the time - to be honest, it's nothing but a way to rationalize the status quo. I have no doubt that they'd try something like this, but they're doing to have one hell of a time proving it.

  13. One of the reasons the old model is dying by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    is that the recording companies can no longer force people to buy a whole album (CD) to get one or two good songs. People are paying a buck or so for individual songs, and just passing up the bad ones. So the recording companies' revenue goes down proportionately... as it should. But they want to keep forcing you to buy a CD.

    The old model of "let's spend millions promoting this artist, then sell 6 million CDs at $20 each" just won't wash anymore. But they don't want to accept that. Well, that makes them dinosaurs.

    1. Re:One of the reasons the old model is dying by Wacky_Wookie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh I completely agree!

      I think the other bonus now is that artists are (or will) be working harder at making a whole album again since people CAN buy single songs on iTunes/online now. Live show are getting better again too. I detect more effort being put into live shows now at ALL levels of musical fame. The whole concept of playing live only because you are supporting and promoting an album is pretty silly for most types of music anyway.

    2. Re:One of the reasons the old model is dying by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Good point. I had not really thought about it that way, but I will pay more attention.

    3. Re:One of the reasons the old model is dying by epine · · Score: 2, Funny

      can no longer force people to buy a whole album (CD) to get one or two good songs

      Yeah, you just want that Money song, they charge you the moon.

  14. Great for the Environment by skreeech · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fewer trucks on the road and fewer CDs being smelted cannot possibly be a bad thing in the big picture. Not a big impact but would positive contribution if it was not BS trying to pass a law.

    --
    [20:36] wwwdot/.dotorg
  15. Re:pirate bay guys got jail time by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

    It's far from over yet. There is still an lengthy appeals process to go through.

  16. What they want is illegal in Canada by HannethCom · · Score: 1

    The CRIA and CMPDA don't seem to understand is that the basis of the business law in Canada requires that when you pay for something, you get something in return. Either a physical form, a license, or a service.

    When you buy a product, you have complete ownership of that product to do with what you want. Now the companies can set what the warranty covers, but they can't control what you do with it.

    Because of the greed of the Music and Film industries this wasn't going to work for them because they wanted to control public showing. Part of Canadian law covers that in the form of purchasing a license.

    This allowed them to license the property for private, or various forms of publish showing. The only problem is you own the license to that performance, not the media it was originally delivered on.

    If I were to download a copy of the blu-ray versions of the movies I own on DVD, that's not illegal because media and format are physical things, I own a license to watch that movie already, it doesn't matter how I get the physical form of it.

    There is the special case Rental License which is paying for the ability to borrow a license someone else owns for a set period of time. There are quite a few restrictions put on rentals to prevent the abuse that the CRIA and CMPDA have tried over the years.

    What the music and video industries have been able to do in other countries is take your money, but give nothing in return. You are paying for the possibility that they might let you listen/watch what you paid for, you have no ownership, license, or rental.

    Business law requires that you either get ownership, a license, or a rental license. All business law is predicated on that. Any modifications to those rules is unconstitutional and is a criminal offense. If this rule was somehow overruled, it would invalidate all business law in Canada.

    Another interesting aspect of this basis of law is that you also can't get anything for free. To get a product, license, or rental, you have to pay, or do something for it.

    This is one of the reasons why a lot of these "free" contest have skill testing questions before you can win the prise, or other forms of "work". In answering the question, you have done some work, to get the prise.

    Also many cars have been sold for a cent because you can't just give a friend a car, no matter what shape it's in. Though now, may only apply to BC, a law has been passed that you have to pay at least $50 for a car. The government wants some tax money.

    --
    Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon what's the difference? All steal money from devs and control with walled gardens.
  17. All this for "entertainment" by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

    They treat this like it's a matter of national security.

    For goodness sake, it's entertainment!

    Why can't they focus this hard on things that actually matter to the health and success of their people?

    Of course we in the US are just as guilty.

    1. Re:All this for "entertainment" by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      They treat this like it's a matter of national security.

      For goodness sake, it's entertainment!

            Some would argue that it's not even entertainment... more like - "torture"?

            I certainly stopped going to the movies and listening to the radio a long time ago, and not because I'm downloading the content online. The internet IS to blame, but because I have found OTHER forms of entertainment. Here I can laugh at the stupidity of my fellow man (there's no shortage) when I want, or educate myself by watching MIT or Berkeley courses online, or troll forums. I don't have to wait in line with obnoxious teenagers, pay for overpriced stale popcorn and sticky sodas, sit in dirty seats and be interrupted by cell phones and childish behavior.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:All this for "entertainment" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The technologies needed to restrict distribution of information to enforce copyright law are pretty much exactly the same as the technologies required to restricit distribution of information to enforce the censorship whims of a despotic police state.

      In both cases, person A is trying to prevent person X passing information to person Y. They're pretty much indistinguishable at the 01010101 level.

      So, governments play along with the small-barking-dog entertainment industry Useful Idiots because it gives them a handy excuse to implement architectures of information control necessary to build a horrible authoritarian dystopia.

  18. Dear Mr.Harper by gaderael · · Score: 1

    A short list of things more important right now:

    Why our troops are in Afganistan (which you say is unwinnable
    Our Economy
    The Health Care system
    Our relationship with the US and the EU
    Food Safety

    Your party is slipping in the polls again. Most people will see this as a waste of time and tax payer money, just like last time.

    Sincerely,
    A Canadien Taxpayer

    --
    Anyone got a light for my sig?
    1. Re:Dear Mr.Harper by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      You'll see an election in Sept. or so when the economy is really in the toilet. And the Liberals will jump all over passing this. I'm willing to take bets on this now.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  19. Broken window fallacy by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Funny

    even claiming that the current rules are costing jobs to truck drivers delivering CDs and DVDs."

          This is a fun game!

          I will see your "jobless CD and DVD delivering truck drivers", and raise you one "dependence on foreign oil funds terrorism". So see, distributing digital material online actually reduces global terrorism and is thus a "goof thing"! Your move.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  20. ...Government Ministers for ... Microsoft... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    > ...Government Ministers for CRIA, CMPDA, and Microsoft...

    Canada has a Minister for Microsoft?

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:...Government Ministers for ... Microsoft... by gwait · · Score: 1

      Probably..

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
  21. Arseholes by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    You know what pisses me off?

    The copyright industry is trying to have it both ways.

    Copyright is supposed to be a partnership between the public and creators. It's supposed to be a 2-way thing.

    As much as the copyright holders love to bitch about how piracy is theft, so is what they're doing. They've stolen 50 years of our culture and locked it away in a vault so they can eke out a few dollars by opening the vault every few years. They're literally stealing money from us every time we buy a CD or hard disk, but they don't want to deal with the fact that we get to have music for that tax. Now, they want to have more control over expression than copyright ever intended, and they want to have it longer than ever before.

    If these companies want all these things, if they want to be able to shut down free speech or control all speech, fine. Let's make the copyright term 5 years. If they want legislation to mandate that they get to have a chip in my computer telling me what I can and cannot watch, then the trade-off should be that the stuff they have power over should be incredibly fleeting. The idea of giving them absolute control over every computer in the country, then giving them that control for 100 or 150 years is utterly against the idea of copyright.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  22. Re:pirate bay guys got jail time by endymion.nz · · Score: 1

    What they did is not actually illegal in Sweden, and this verdict was delivered by the lowest court. Sucks to be you not knowing what 'appeal' means.

    --
    mediocrity rules, man
  23. Oh technology, let me count the ways I hate you... by tiananmen+tank+man · · Score: 1

    The past: Technology has created the horseless carrige. Physical items are moved around more effieciently. Horseshoe repairmen are out of jobs

    The present: Technology has created the digital age. Information is reproduced and spread about more efficiently. The middlemen who use to reproduce (making records/cds) and spread (market and distribute) this information are losing their jobs.

    The furture: Technology has created a device that clones physical items like food. Physical items are reproduced more efficiently. If the present is any indication, the people who use to create these physical items will be trying to use the law to prevent society from freely reproducing these physical items.

    I agree copyright is a good thing for society, but technology has made its current length unreasonable

  24. Um... by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

    Please Canada take a look at the USA and see how between software patents, the DMCA, and other draconian legislation, our tech sector has been quickly crumbling.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  25. Allow me to help... by PinchDuck · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Dear Canadian Government Officials:
    Your Corporate Overlords in the United States DEMAND you pass this legislation immediately! We order our continental second-class citizens to bow to our dictates. If you do not, it will jeopardize your status as our vassal and psychological 51st state. Disobey your American Corporate Overlords at your own peril. Obey!

    USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA!

    That should do the trick.

  26. YES take them off the net then get draconian laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A) get bell canada to double cost of internet
    - this takes voices off the net in droves
    B) wait till iggy got power and made peace with lyin brian mulroney
    - this makes the liberals and conservatives buddies and makes thngs JUST like a democrat and republic dum dum election event as in bribe both sides and get what you want.
    C) Continue to get the Harper govt to sneak in other legislation with other laws until you jig saw n the worst piece of copyright laws you can that will destroy the economy.

    ANYONE that says Hollywood is good for the world should be shot as a traitor to there country.
    Anyone touting these laws is a traitor.

  27. What can *I* do? by Internalist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I live in Ottawa and want to do something more than write a letter that I know will be ignored to a local MP who I know is not in line with my position anyway. While I'm interested in law & policy as it applies to this domain, it's definitely not in my sphere of knowledge.

    Do /.ers have any suggestions about what I can do to fight this, or good ways to raise awareness?

    --
    Research is what I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing. -- Wernher von Braun
    1. Re:What can *I* do? by gwait · · Score: 1

      Actually the last time around many interested people showed up at the minister's office in Calgary to protest Bill C-61, and it totally caught the minister by surprise (Someone cares about this issue?).
      If you can find a local group, you can physically show up and get in the face of the politicians in Ottawa. Also, you could blog/report about local Ottawa news related to this issue which would also be a benefit since the traditional news media have a severe conflict of interest on this subject.

      Start by digging thru Michael Geist's web pages, I'd bet you will find contact info there..

      http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/3860/125/

      Someone else also mentioned this site:

      http://www.onlinerights.ca/

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    2. Re:What can *I* do? by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Do /.ers have any suggestions about what I can do to fight this, or good ways to raise awareness?

      Burn down the Capital.
      Doesn't matter whose, yours or mine. (if you go for mine, I'll help)

      signed,
      a US Patriot

      On a serious note, I don't have a good answer for you...we're up to our ears with the same alligators.
      I think it needs to start with massive copyright law reform. Until it gets back to sane levels, this can never be resolved.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  28. Maybe we should tell the CRIA by canwaf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Maybe someone should tell the CRIA that "grassroots" campaigns coming from paid staffers is called astroturf.

    1. Re:Maybe we should tell the CRIA by gwait · · Score: 1

      I suspect they already know that, and will sue you for using the word astroturf. Oh damn, I used it too!

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
  29. I may take flak for this but.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    I don't have a problem with most of the proposals, as long as three criteria are met: 1) that the mere technological circumvention of copy protection does not, by itself, constitute the breaking of any law, including copyright; 2) that copying for personal and private use of the person making the copy always be exempt from infringement, as long as the copy from which the private-use copy was made was not itself infringing; and 3) that if copy protection circumvention must be considered a crime at all, that it _ONLY_ be considered such when actual copyright infringement has also occurred.

  30. Railroads cost truckers jobs in Canada. by L0VECHILD · · Score: 1

    Advancements in Railroad technology will cost Canadian truck drivers far more jobs than anything else in the near future.

  31. FUD Fud and more fud by LymeM · · Score: 1

    It is true that Canada signed the previous WIPO treaties, what is even more true is that Canada is in compliance with those treaties right now without any additional DCMA laws. It is also true that the CRIA has been pushing for stronger laws, like c-61, it also happens to be true that the CRIA does not represent Canadian artists. The CRIA was forced a few years back to write and distribute a announcement to that fact after the Canadian artists said "screw you and your horrible ideals". The CRIA needs to expect another large fight on their hands with this tripe, and possibly a lawsuit pretending to be a grass roots organization.

  32. Less is more by mrdtr · · Score: 1

    Think of the environmental benefits of having fewer cd's dvd's produced - just to be stockpiled in everyones homes then to end up in the garbage dumps, and fewer gas guzzling trucks on the roads is certainly a plus too. PS...I'm not a green peace freak, just trying to look on the bright side of things. lol.

  33. Geist is on the case... by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    I wish the MAFIAA good luck.

    Geist has the ear of the main stream media outlets in CA, and will be able to handily shoot down any "arguments" they try to offer to stir up "grass roots" campaigns.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  34. Digital sales, not CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Complete BS! What they fail to mention is what's really costing truckers jobs -- the increase in online digital sales. According to http://www.itfacts.biz/33-of-all-music-sold-in-2008-was-digital/12867 and other sites 33% of all music sales last year were digital. Smoke and mirrors.