Microsoft Asks Open Source Not to Focus On Price
Microsoft's supposed open-source guru Sam Ramji has asked open-source vendors to focus on "value" instead of "cost" with respect to competition with Microsoft products. This is especially funny given the Redmond giant's recent "Apple Tax" message. "While I'm sure Ramji meant well, I'm equally certain that Microsoft would like nothing more than to not be reminded of how expensive its products can be compared with open-source solutions. After all, Microsoft was the company that turned the software industry on its head by introducing lower-cost solutions years ago to undermine the Unix businesses of IBM and Hewlett-Packard, and the database businesses of Oracle and IBM."
So he's asking people to get a recent Ubuntu build instead of Vista?
and indicative of Microsoft's sense of entitlement.
...are more important. As is leveraging a new paradigm
Not just "other people", generally, but specifically telling competitors how they should market products against Microsoft's.
This is Lauren. She told us she wanted a stable OS with an Office Suite and some photo editing software for $0. We told her, you find it, you keep it.
Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
Microsoft: Please compete with us on our terms??!?! Pretty please?!
Open-source: No.
Send your spendthrift head of state this
I remember when Windows was laughable.
Well, yeah. I can remember back to yesterday, too. No big feat there...
but as value is roughly modeled as utility/cost
If the Open Source solution costs $0.00 doesn't that lead to an undefined value in your equation?
Managment is stupid but even they won't fall for non-real numbers.
Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
but as value is roughly modeled as utility/cost
If the Open Source solution costs $0.00 doesn't that lead to an undefined value in your equation?
I get it! Microsoft wants open source to fall in the "divide by zero" trap! ;)
Support for your employees?? Might as well buy bras for your female employees and cups for your male employees as spend money on Microsoft support. They'll get much better support that way. You even get better information about FOS when you google than you do about MSOffice.
Please don't focus on quality or security either.
Please focus on... customer support! We heard Linux didn't have any of that. We tried logging on to #linux this one time but someone told us to RTFM and banned us from the channel.
I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?
I trust the Internet before I trust a support contract.
You must have a lot of products from the company formerly known as BEA.
Nah - if that was the case, he'd be currently consulting his oracle.
Oh wait...
If you buy a Symnantec product, you need Therapy, not support.
Your employees need support to use a word processor and spreadsheet? I think your money would be better spent hiring competent people over support contracts.
There...fixed that for you.
Unless you DID mean component...in which case I would suggest you buy better quality components.
regards
dave Mundt
YAB - http://blog.beemandave.com/
I've always had better luck hiring component people.
Please do not read this sig. Thank you.