Slashdot Mirror


The Road To Terabit Ethernet

stinkymountain writes "Pre-standard 40 Gigabit and 100 Gigabit Ethernet products — server network interface cards, switch uplinks and switches — are expected to hit the market later this year. Standards-compliant products are expected to ship in the second half of next year, not long after the expected June 2010 ratification of the 802.3ba standard. Despite the global economic slowdown, global revenue for 10G fixed Ethernet switches doubled in 2008, according to Infonetics. There is pent-up demand for 40 Gigabit and 100 Gigabit Ethernet, says John D'Ambrosia, chair of the 802.3ba task force in the IEEE and a senior research scientist at Force10 Networks. 'There are a number of people already who are using link aggregation to try and create pipes of that capacity,' he says. 'It's not the cleanest way to do things...(but) people already need that capacity.' D'Ambrosia says even though 40/100G Ethernet products haven't arrived yet, he's already thinking ahead to terabit Ethernet standards and products by 2015. 'We are going to see a call for a higher speed much sooner than we saw the call for this generation' of 10/40/100G Ethernet, he says."

17 of 210 comments (clear)

  1. 10 mbit/s ought to be enough for anybody by Shakrai · · Score: 1, Funny

    ;)

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    1. Re:10 mbit/s ought to be enough for anybody by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't you mean 5 Mebibit per second?

      That gives you 640KB per second.

    2. Re:10 mbit/s ought to be enough for anybody by Locklin · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sweet, more pixels than retinal ganglion cells. Where can I get an eye upgrade?

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
  2. Re:Physics? by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean at some point doesn't it become impossible to move electrons or modulate data any faster?

    Nah, at that point you just place the whole ethernet infrastructure within a subspace field, modulate the deflector dish a little bit and you'll be off and running.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  3. "We think we'll need even more speed... later on" by jimbudncl · · Score: 2, Funny

    News at 11.

  4. Re:More data forces the need for more bandwidth by bcmm · · Score: 5, Funny

    Being able to push more content, move more data, combined with data files being that much larger, is the real driving force behind this push.

    +1 Insightful; until now I never truly understood why people wanted more bandwidth.

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  5. Bah by BigBlueOx · · Score: 2, Funny

    All *we* had was an acoustic coupler. And an Ohio Scientfic. S-100 bus. 8k of memory IF you were looky. AND we read the bits as they came over the phone AND typed them in ourselves.

    And you tell that to the kids today and they won't believe you. Bah. Spit.

  6. Re:Bring it on! by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Personally my home LAN is outgrowing GigE

    Uhh... seriously, *WTF*. What do you have, a dozen teenage boys streaming HD porn 24 hours a day from a central server or something?

  7. Re:More data forces the need for more bandwidth by mc1138 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ok, but I warn you, the size of the news letter increases exponentially every day.

  8. Stragglers in the March of Progress by Cyanara · · Score: 2, Funny

    The other day I had a small business for a client and was amazed to discover that they were running a significant network through a 10Mbps hub. Being able to upgrade that to a (rather affordable) Gigabit switch was quite satisfying.

  9. By 2015... by castironpigeon · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...we'll be able to use our monthly bandwidth allowance in under one second. Hooray?

    --
    mmmm...forbidden donut
  10. Re:Article summary by Jae686 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Linux just isn't ready for the desktop yet. It may be ready for the web servers that you nerds use to distribute your TRON fanzines and personal Dungeons and Dragons web-sights across the world wide web, but the average computer user isn't going to spend months learning how to use a CLI and then hours compiling packages so that they can get a workable graphic interface to check their mail with, especially not when they already have a Windows machine that does its job perfectly well and is backed by a major corporation, as opposed to Linux which is only supported by a few unemployed nerds living in their mother's basement somewhere. The last thing I want is a level 5 dwarf (haha) providing me my OS.

    Wait, what? There ARE TRON fanzines? Hummm I must get my Terabyte gear NOW!

  11. Re:Why? by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cloud computing.

    --

    Stop the brainwash

  12. Re:More data forces the need for more bandwidth by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 3, Funny

    +1 Insightful; until now I never truly understood why people wanted more bandwidth.

    Warez, pr0n, and MP3's. That's all. Take those away and we might as well be using 300 bps modems.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  13. For a moment there... by ryzvonusef · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought The heading was "The Road to Terabithia" :)

    --
    I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
  14. Re:More data forces the need for more bandwidth by windsurfer619 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You first ;)

  15. 'Road'? Shouldn't that be 'Bridge'? by Namarrgon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Didn't anyone else think 'Bridge to Terabit Ether'?

    What a missed headline opportunity.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?