Slashdot Mirror


US Declares Public Health Emergency Over Swine Flu

mallumax sends word from the NYTimes that US government officials today declared a public health emergency over increasing cases of the swine flu first seen in Mexico. Here is additional coverage from CNN. From the Times: "American health officials [say]... that they had confirmed 20 cases of the disease in the United States and expected to see more as investigators fan out to track down the path of the outbreak. Other governments around the world stepped up their response to the incipient outbreak, racing to contain the infection amid reports of potential new cases from New Zealand to Hong Kong to Spain, raising concerns about the potential for a global pandemic. The cases in US looked to be similar to the deadly strain of swine flu that has killed more than 80 people in Mexico and infected 1,300 more." Reader "The man who walks in the woods" sends a link to accounts emailed to the BBC from readers in Mexico. While these are anecdotal, they do paint a picture of a more serious situation than government announcements have indicated so far.

32 of 695 comments (clear)

  1. Not necessarily over-reacting by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It would be easy to think that the government is just over-reacting to this swine flu, and they might be (that was my first impression), but it is better to over-react than to under-react and end up with a huge world-wide influenza epidemic such as occurred in 1918. Making the public slightly paranoid can help prevent the spread of the flu.

    1. Re:Not necessarily over-reacting by maxume · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I caught a few minutes of a press conference on CNN. Janet Napolitano, the Secretary of Homeland Security started it by saying something to the effect of 'this makes things sound worse than they are, but it allows us to activate public health resources'.

      So perhaps the vocabulary is poor, but the reaction doesn't really resemble crying wolf.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  2. Re:Is this flu really "special"? by RsG · · Score: 5, Informative

    Those thousands that die are among hundreds of thousands or more who get infected. This strain has infected far fewer people, yet killed more of them, so the mortality rate is much higher.

    If infection became widespread, as was the case in 1918, then we could be looking at serious losses.

    --
    Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
  3. Re:Is this flu really "special"? by etymxris · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yes, this flu is different. It is primarily killing young healthy adults. It looks to work the same way as the 1918 flu, killing those with the healthiest immune systems through the "cytokine storm".

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:W_curve.png

  4. Re:Is this flu really "special"? by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Funny

    > Why does this one have a special name?

    a) It is genetically different from the usual flus.
    b) In 1918 a form of swine flu killed millions.

    > I can't decide how scared to be.

    So far it seems to kill only Mexicans. I suppose you could construct a conspiracy theory around that.

    > As if there were anything I could do about it anyways.

    Avoid people. They're dangerous.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  5. Re:God damn... by denzacar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not if you want god to damn them all.

    You want them all damned - you say swines just to make sure.
    Or he might damn just one swine and then where would we be? Back at square one, that's where.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  6. Re:Is this flu really "special"? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Informative

    Also this is the first recorded time Swine flu has passed from human to human.

    Nope

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  7. Re:Is this flu really "special"? by Narpak · · Score: 5, Informative
    Quoted from Wikipedia:

    The 1918 flu pandemic (commonly referred to as the Spanish flu) was an influenza pandemic that spread to nearly every part of the world. It was caused by an unusually virulent and deadly Influenza A virus strain of subtype H1N1. Historical and epidemiologic data are inadequate to identify the geographic origin of the virus.[1] Most of its victims were healthy young adults, in contrast to most influenza outbreaks which predominantly affect juvenile, elderly, or otherwise weakened patients. The pandemic lasted from March 1918 to June 1920, spreading even to the Arctic and remote Pacific islands. It is estimated that anywhere from 20 to 100 million people were killed worldwide.

    While we, at least industrialized countries, are far better equipped to deal with another major outbreak than in 1918; I feel taking precautions would be the rational thing to do.

  8. Re:Is this flu really "special"? by Animaether · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you'd take a little time to read about it... yes, it's 'really' special.

    I'm not saying "ZOMG WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE"-special - we're not, as it is, many of those infected happily survive.

    Let's start with 'the flu', though.. There is no 'the flu'. Influenza is a big ol' family of viruses.

    This one - although it baffles me why the media latched onto 'swine' as their name for it, maybe the pork industry lobbied strongly against naming it 'pork' or 'pig' flu - is one of the mutations of form H1N1 ('bird flu' was H5N1; H and N refer to certain protein types). That only tells part of the story as there's multiple H1N1s with different aminoacids and whatnot, like yea olde Spanish flu (yeah, the proper pandemic one) was H1N1 as well. There's the first 'special' bit; it shares a name with the Spanish flu.

    Won't go into details about how it differs from Spanish flu - suffice it to say that this particular strain of H1N1 influenza appears to be a mixture of porcine, bird and human flu viruses' RNA. From there comes the second 'special' bit. It's 'rare' that the flu jumps species from pigs to humans in general, even rarer for it to thrive, but even more rare that it appears to spread between humans.

    Now for the third special bit... even H5N1 - that other 'big scare' - mostly affected the (really) young, the elderly, and the weak in terms of severity. This one, however, seems to just as happily make young healthy adults sick.

    That's why it deserves its own little name. As for how scared you should be:
    'Swine' flu responds well to the relatively recent anti-flu drug Oseltamivir (marketing name: Tamiflu). That is to say, it gets killed pretty quickly and eradicated from the body if treatment is followed through (yeah, I know, right?). That's good news for the producers of Tamiflu who love having this in the news, and for their shareholders who saw their stock skyrocket as a result. It's pretty special that there's tons of people out there just waiting around to make money off of this kind of thing.
    Oh, and it's also good news for those infected, of course.

    Unfortunately, Tamiflu (and others) are prescribed willy-nilly as seasonal flu drugs (despite the CDC advising against it; like 'advice' matters if there's a mint to be made), making it all the more likely that more resistant strains will pop up in due time.
    At the same time, being a relatively recent drug, not all of the side-effects are fully known and understood yet.

    As for what you can do about it...
    - I wouldn't plan a trip to Mexico and go frolic with any pigs if I were you.
    - I wouldn't swap spit/etc. with any of the students already diagnosed as being possibly infected.
    - If you are infected with any type of flu.. cover your mouth when sneezing/coughing, wash hands regularly. Won't do much for you, but it'll help prevent spreading of it.

    Speaking of the CDC.. they have some pretty decent pages up as well:
    http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/general_info.htm

  9. Re:Souvenir by maxume · · Score: 5, Funny

    Herpes will last longer.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  10. Re:Yawn by Daswolfen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it may be 'disaster of the week' for you, but to those of us who can pay attention for more than 5 minutes will see the direct correlation between this and the 1918 epidemic that killed 50 million people world wide.

    The 1918 flu was theorized to have started in Kansas around March 4th. By March 11th it was spread as far as New York City. In weeks, it had mutated into a more virulent strain that went on to kill more people than WWI had. It had killed an estimated 20 million people in 25 weeks, and that was without global air travel.

    I hope that this is just a minor incident and a false alarm, but since it has already proven to be resistant to the first two of the four major flu anti-virals (the neuraminidase inhibitors - Tamiflu and Relenza are the ones that seem to be effective so far), that in and of itself is cause for concern.

    And if 80+ dead in 1000+ cases worldwide so far(and they are mostly healthy and young) are not more than 'nervous hand wringing' to you, then you are a fool. Add to that, is the fact that it has spread globally in a few days, spreads person to person rather easily and the chances of finding patient zero in a place like Mexico is going to be near impossible, makes this appear to be something that is more than 'nervous hand wringing by the talking heads'

    --
    Don't rush me, Sonny. You rush a miracle man, you get rotten miracles.
  11. Re:Multivitamins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This virus is killing healthier people. Clearly the solution is to eat terribly and weaken your immune system.

  12. I wouldn't particularly worry by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do all the normal prudent things like wash your hands plenty, try not to stand next to the guy coughing up a lung, etc. Keep up on the situation on the CDC's website, not on random places like Slashdot. The reason is that the Internet has a LOT of doomsdayers, if you haven't noticed. They are always after the next thing that's going to fuck us over. The one I remember most recently was when there were stories of cable cuts in mid east, doomsdayers said this meant the US was going to invade Iran in a couple days, Bush would declare marshal law, and the election would be suspended. Ya well, we all see how much of that happened.

    So get your info from a reliable source. The CDC is interested in keeping people safe and stopping the spread of this (and all other) disease. They are also staffed with experts. People on random forums often have no idea what the fuck they are talking about, like to blow things up, and predict the end of the world every other month.

    Only thing special to do maybe is make sure you've got flu food. By that I mean things like chicken noodle soup and such. If you get sick you probably aren't going to feel like shopping (and shouldn't go shopping since you don't want to spread your sickness) and you also aren't likely to feel like eating pizza and such.

  13. Re:Is this flu really "special"? by Peter+H.S. · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The flu kills thousands of people every year. Why does this one have a special name?.

    Flu usually kills the very old and the very young. From what I have read, this one is different; it kills young and healthy persons, a segment that rarely dies from normal flu. The so called Spanish Flu (or Grippe) from around the first world war had a very similar fatality pattern. Since that pandemic attack killed at least 50 million people around the world it is clear that this new flu must be taken very, very seriously. There doesn't seem to be that much hard evidence around regarding the symptoms though; does it attack the lungs in the same way as the Grippe? It appears that the Grippe turned peoples own immune system against themselves which is why young healthy persons with good immune systems died in such large numbers and often so violently fast.

    From what little info I have seen it appears that this swine Flu attack and kills some young and healthy persons, while other victims have very mild symptoms; that is the exact same pattern as the first major wave of the Grippe. According to some researchers this attack pattern caused the Grippe virus strain to be refined to the extremely deadly strain it was when it attacked again. Some victims died within an hour of having the first symptoms, and people would literally drop dead without warning while walking in the streets, pupils in classrooms would suddenly fall over their desk dead.

    --
    Regards

  14. Re:News flash! by The+Redster! · · Score: 5, Funny

    YOU all are going to die. I'm moving to Madagascar.

  15. Re:That doesn't seem very intelligent to me by spiffmastercow · · Score: 5, Funny

    Eh, its not so bad once you learn the syntax. It's amazing how many people believe God doesn't listen to their prayers, when all they had to do was perform some simple debugging. Alternatively, I hear you can pray in python now, though its significantly less responsive.

  16. Re:Is this flu really "special"? by jabithew · · Score: 5, Informative

    While we, at least industrialized countries, are far better equipped to deal with another major outbreak than in 1918; I feel taking precautions would be the rational thing to do.

    Don't be so sure about it my friend. My parents work in the NHS. The procedure for a flu pandemic assumes that society will collapse, which will likely be a reasonable assessment. All the preparations have been aimed at H5N1, so though the anti-virals stockpiled will most likely work*, the vaccines will not**.

    I think this one is the real deal. The death rate is high, considering it's in Mexico, which may not be on a par with the UK in medical treatment but isn't sub-Saharan Africa or rural China either.

    The BBC is quoting doctors as saying that this has been around for a week. If people in Mexico City are expressing symptoms, you can bet it's around the world now, by people carrying it during its incubation period. I live in London, and I bet you a tenner that someone, somewhere in this city has this right now.

    *There are some reports that anti-virals are ineffective, I think they're hysteria.
    **They probably wouldn't have anyway.

    --
    All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
  17. worry in october, not now by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Informative

    recall that the spanish flu of 1918 came out in the summer, and was mild

    http://science.nationalgeographic.com/science/health-and-human-body/human-diseases/next-killer-flu.html

    In 1918, the final year of the savage trench fighting of World War I, something else began felling the soldiers. No one knows for sure when or where the Spanish flu emerged, though it certainly wasn't in Spain. As a neutral country, Spain had no wartime censorship, and the flu apparently got its false pedigree from news reports about outbreaks there in May 1918. In fact the disease was already spreading on both sides of the European front, laying low entire divisions through the spring and early summer. Then it seemed to subside.

    In late summer, though, the Spanish flu returned, and this time its virulence was unmistakable. The sick took to their beds with fever, piercing headache, and joint pain. Many were young adults, exactly the group that normally shrugs off the flu. About 5 percent of the victims died, some in just two or three days, their faces turning a ghastly purple as they essentially suffocated to death. Doctors who opened the chests of the dead were horrified: The lungs, normally light and elastic, were as heavy as waterlogged sponges, clogged with bloody fluid.

    then the cold weather came, and it came down like a scythe. we will experience media hype for a month or two, the swine flu will be forgotten, then it will suddenly resurge like crazy in october. the reason is the flu virus actually survives better in the cold air than the warm air, and travels greater distances. the warm summer air will help us fight the flu, for now. there was science a few months ago that proved that:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7276447.stm

    The virus's outer membrane is composed chiefly of molecules known as lipids, such as oils, fats and cholesterol.

    The researchers found that at temperatures slightly above freezing, this lipid covering solidified into a gel.

    However, as temperatures approached 15.6C (60F) , the covering gradually thawed, eventually melting to a soupy mix.

    The researchers concluded that temperatures in the spring and summer were too high to allow the viral membrane to enter its gel state.

    As a result, at these temperatures the individual flu viruses would dry out and weaken - accounting for the end of the flu season.

    thats why flu is always a cold month thing

    so the thing to do is not worry now, worry later. the warm weather will mitigate the flu. then we should all keep a very wary eye come october, that's when the swine flu will prove if it is a superkiller or not

    one more concern:

    the cytokine storm

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytokine_storm

    this explains why those who died of the spanish flu, and are dying of swine flu now, are young, healthy adults. perversely, the healthier you are, the more you will be prone to die of the swine flu: your body overreacts, like anaphylactic shock. less healthy immune systems mean you underreact, and your lungs aren't flooded to death by your won body. the very young, and the very old, they should be able to weather the swine flu. the worst case scenario (hopefully this just fizzles out like SARS), it is us in the prime of life, 25-45, who will bear the brunt of mortality when everyone gets it this fall, hospitals are swamped, and the tamiflu runs out. then you have children and elderly with no breadwinners to take care of them

    prepare now, you have until fall until the scythe comes (hopefully, it won't, it could still fizzle out)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  18. Re:Google mashup? by slashqwerty · · Score: 5, Informative

    For goodness sakes, how did this get modded up? At least post a real link.

  19. Re:What's next? by Auraiken · · Score: 5, Funny

    Probably Kung-flu.

    Thanks, I'll be here all week, DON'T try the pork!

  20. Re:Is this flu really "special"? by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 5, Informative

    *There are some reports that anti-virals are ineffective, I think they're hysteria.

    The US Centers for Disease Control say the following:

    "There are four different antiviral drugs that are licensed for use in the US for the treatment of influenza: amantadine, rimantadine, oseltamivir and zanamivir. While most swine influenza viruses have been susceptible to all four drugs, the most recent swine influenza viruses isolated from humans are resistant to amantadine and rimantadine. At this time, CDC recommends the use of oseltamivir or zanamivir for the treatment and/or prevention of infection with swine influenza viruses."

    --
    But then again, I could be wrong.
  21. Re:Is this flu really "special"? by jabithew · · Score: 5, Informative

    Oseltamivir is the one the NHS has stockpiled, under the brand Tamiflu.

    --
    All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
  22. Environmental Factors? by W.Mandamus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sorry to point out the obvious here but Mexico City is located more then a mile above sea level (higher elevation then Denver). Could environmental factors be the reason that people are dying of respritory complications in Mexico but, so far, this doesn't seem worse then other flu outbreaks. And keep in mind folks, in a normal flu season around 30,000 people (out of a population of 340,000,000) die of the flu in the US.

  23. Those comments are horrifying by benjamindees · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a doctor, I realise that the media does not report the truth. Authorities distributed vaccines among all the medical personnel with no results, because two of my partners who worked in this hospital (interns) were killed by this new virus in less than six days even though they were vaccinated as all of us were.

    I'm a specialist doctor in respiratory diseases and intensive care at the Mexican National Institute of Health. Staff are starting to leave and many are opting to retire or apply for holidays. It is killing three to four patients daily, and it has been going on for more than three weeks.

    I am a doctor and I work in the State of Mexico. We doctors knew this was happening a week before the alert was issued and were told to get vaccinated.

    In the capital of my state, Oaxaca, there is a hospital closed because of a death related to the porcine influenza. Many friends working in hospitals or related fields say that the situation is really bad, they are talking about 19 people dead in Oaxaca, including a doctor and a nurse. They say they got shots but they were told not to talk about the real situation.

    Two of my friends at work are sick, they were sick for a couple of days, they went to the hospital and they sent them back to work. The doctor told them it was just a flu until Friday when the alarm was spread, then they were allowed to go home. I work in a call centre and I'm worried because there are no windows in the building so it cannot be ventilated and around 400 people work there. We all have talked to our supervisor but no one has done anything not even sterilise or disinfect the area. We will be sick soon and, well, do the math - 400 can infect at least another two per day.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  24. Re:GERMS ARE GOOD..... by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > Maybe if we didn't completely sterilize every conceivable surface in out packing houses
    > and restaurants, sterilize foods in radiation and chemicals, and push people to drench
    > their houses in Lysol every time somebody coughed, we either wouldn't have this problem,
    > or it wouldn't be as bad as it is.

    "We" didn't do all that in 1918. 50 million people died. Hygiene is primarily responsible for the drastic reduction in infectious disease in the last 100 years.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  25. Mod Points! by atrocious+cowpat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somebody [Cough] hand me Mod Points! [Cough] [Sneeze] [Cough] [Cough]... Thanks, I'll be dying here all wee... [Cough] [Sneeze] [Cough] [Retch]

    --
    sig? Oh, that sig...
  26. Re:Is this flu really "special"? by benjamindees · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a new strain of "swine" flu (only called that because it originated in swine) that contains elements of bird, human, and swine flu viruses. It is transmitted between humans. Stop spreading misinformation.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  27. Re:Is this flu really "special"? by zxjio · · Score: 5, Informative

    Is 7% a "high" death rate?

    Wikipedia has normal flu mortality at 0.1%.

  28. The advice from the CDC by Parallax48 · · Score: 5, Informative
    See the CDC page (copied below): http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/swineflu_you.htm For up to the minute data:
    http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/whatsnew.htm?s_cid=tw_epr_68 http://twitter.com/CDCemergency
    CDC page pasted into comment:
    What is swine flu?
    Swine Influenza (swine flu) is a respiratory disease of pigs caused by type A influenza viruses that causes regular outbreaks in pigs. People do not normally get swine flu, but human infections can and do happen. Swine flu viruses have been reported to spread from person-to-person, but in the past, this transmission was limited and not sustained beyond three people.

    Are there human infections with swine flu in the U.S.?
    In late March and early April 2009, cases of human infection with swine influenza A (H1N1) viruses were first reported in Southern California and near San Antonio, Texas. Other U.S. states have reported cases of swine flu infection in humans and cases have been reported internationally as well. An updated case count of confirmed swine flu infections in the United States is kept at http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/investigation.htm CDC and local and state health agencies are working together to investigate this situation.

    Is this swine flu virus contagious?
    CDC has determined that this swine influenza A (H1N1) virus is contagious and is spreading from human to human. However, at this time, it not known how easily the virus spreads between people.

    What are the signs and symptoms of swine flu in people?
    The symptoms of swine flu in people are similar to the symptoms of regular human flu and include fever, cough, sore throat, body aches, headache, chills and fatigue. Some people have reported diarrhea and vomiting associated with swine flu. In the past, severe illness (pneumonia and respiratory failure) and deaths have been reported with swine flu infection in people. Like seasonal flu, swine flu may cause a worsening of underlying chronic medical conditions.

    How does swine flu spread?
    Spread of this swine influenza A (H1N1) virus is thought to be happening in the same way that seasonal flu spreads. Flu viruses are spread mainly from person to person through coughing or sneezing of people with influenza. Sometimes people may become infected by touching something with flu viruses on it and then touching their mouth or nose.

    How can someone with the flu infect someone else?
    Infected people may be able to infect others beginning 1 day before symptoms develop and up to 7 or more days after becoming sick. That means that you may be able to pass on the flu to someone else before you know you are sick, as well as while you are sick.

    What should I do to keep from getting the flu?
    First and most important: wash your hands. Try to stay in good general health. Get plenty of sleep, be physically active, manage your stress, drink plenty of fluids, and eat nutritious food. Try not touch surfaces that may be contaminated with the flu virus. Avoid close contact with people who are sick.

    Are there medicines to treat swine flu?
    Yes. CDC recommends the use of oseltamivir or zanamivir for the treatment and/or prevention of infection with these swine influenza viruses. Antiviral drugs are prescription medicines (pills, liquid or an inhaler) that fight against the flu by keeping flu viruses from reproducing in your body. If you get sick, antiviral drugs can make your illness milder and make you feel better faster. They may also prevent serious flu complications. For treatment, antiviral drugs work best if started soon after getting sick (within 2 days of symptoms).

    How long can an infected person spread swine

  29. Re:Is this flu really "special"? by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Funny

    > Don't be so sure about it my friend. My parents work in the NHS. The procedure for a flu
    > pandemic assumes that society will collapse

    I'd be willing to bet you quite a large amount of money that it won't (think about that for a minute before you answer).

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  30. Re:Immune system overreacting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The answer is both "yes" and "no", and for odd reasons.

    Cytokines are signaling proteins. They're used by cells to tell the body that the cells in the area are inflamed, which causes the immune system to react in those areas. In a cytokine storm, the immune system scrams and releases proteins to counter the feedback, but overcompensates, causing the cells to release more. The levels eventually reach critical mass, to the point that it disrupts many other cellular activities, which eventually leads to death.

    In individuals who are immunocompromised, a cytokine storm can still happen, and it is more often lethal. Instead of the storm being a positive feedback loop, it's just a feedforward system; the body just produces so many cytokines that it disrupts ordinary function, and the immune system is not able to overcome the level of cytokines to stop the cascade.

    However, there are drugs that exist that directly effect the creation and level of cytokines in the system, which is where intentionally weakening the immune system will help. Many drugs that work to prevent damage done by chronic inflammation will help, e.g. steroids, ACE inhibitors and anti-TNF-α drugs. [Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha is a cytokine]. Given along with influenza viral inhibitors (oseltamivir, zanamivir), these drugs should reduce mortality rates.

    Sometime in the (Star Trek) future, we will find out which proteins are part of these Flu viruses are causing this cytokine action, and we can target it directly to stop a cytokine storm in flu cases. We already have leads on some of them, including genes PA, PB1 & PB2 in relation to nucleoproteins found in some flu viruses, including the Spanish Flu. Drugs like it may eventually become so common place to where it will be used to reduce the symptoms of the common flu in moderate to severe cases.

  31. Re:Wonderful by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't wait till someone comes in my pharmacy and coughs this all over me. /pharmacist

    Did you take a job as a pharmacist only expecting to talk to healthy and attractive people?

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)