You may have an anger problem. Also, reading comprehension: he said that this test is likely to detect tumors that do no harm to you, but medicine being medicine, any tumor is likely to be treated so aggressively as to cause harm to you thru side-effects. That makes great sense.
No the author has ignored the terms of the license and stolen their work. To be okay, he would need to have given its authors credit, and said that it is licensed GFDL/CC and so you too can use it. He can charge for a reproduction if he wants, cost is not relevant; but freedom and acknowledgement are necessary.
Telephone companies like unlimited local etc. calling because they've found that tracking each little usage of a minute here, fifteen minutes there, for all of their subscribers is not worth the cost of the bureaucracy and systems needed. They are then renting the line, not any physical good that can diminish, like water or electricity. It's much the same situation with ISPs. Their tiered plans have rates ridiculously profitable, and if those rates were brought back to something reasonable for the cost involved, flat plans would still be attractive for everyone involved.
I was recently watching Hulu and saw an ad for what I first thought might be Firefox. Turns out it was Chrome, which is too bad (we already know Google can advertise). It seems like the perfect space to advertise for Firefox or, better yet, a Linux distribution. You know people there are somewhat tech savvy, and frankly for whatever your friend says, having professionally-produced advertisements on respectable places like Hulu stamp "Ubuntu" into your consciousness means a lot for acceptance.
You don't understand addiction if you think it something to be fought with logical persuasion. And you are probably normal in saying to ditch him, but really, I'm disgusted by how callous people are today. Friendships and relationships involve a little inconvenience, not just saying, 'well, I told him it's a bad idea, fuck him!'
Experimenting by delaying a pageload for 500ms is worthy of ethical considerations? Would you like to sue Microsoft for emotional damage? Too many people are afraid of doing anything these days.
Look at some of the other awful shit this esteemed publication has put out:
The People's Republic of China claims to have invented the world's first completely unhackable operating system. The project, known as Kylin, is supposed to keep the evil running dog imperialist pigs from stealing all those glorous technological secrets that have made China the centre of technological development. Or at least those that its workers have used their superior technological skill to half inch from foreign servers.
Your save the world, fuck the rules, and money means nothing attitude makes me cringe. You may really burn yourself here. Life isn't some television show. Providing for yourself or being broke is not a joke.
This is a VM integrated graphically into the Win7 GUI. FTA: "Most of the features called Windows XP Mode are really features of the new Windows Virtual PC." Their "virtual application support" for the top Win7 editions just makes it more convenient.
It was said in a BBC News article a few days ago, which I can't find at the moment, that Mexico has so many deaths because there is a culture that you go to the doctor only as a last resort, and by then the infected people are really bad.
You absolutely in no circumstances can ethically give a healthy person mind-altering substances without their consent... People quoted who say it's interesting for potential are on a massive ego trip.
"Spanish flu" came about because all countries infected before Spain were at war and had press censorship in place. Therefore, the first real public record of the pandemic was in Spain...
That's silly. Look, GDP measures economic activity. Research and development is a form of investment in technology, which is one of the forces in economic growth. Because not all or even most investment is done by the government, investment is best measured by GDP rather than government budget.
It mentions that these killer strains of flu are an anomaly in a virus that mutates rapidly, and so the general trend is for an outbreak to become less and less deadly as it continues (i.e., subsequent generations revert to the mean). Also, there were multiple strains in play at different times during the whole 1918-1920 crisis.
Is fifteen cents per page a normal on-demand charge? Books with nothing special about them will cost a few dollars to print conventionally. Blackwell's costs are higher I'm sure and they have the retail share as well. But still, $55 for a book that might otherwise retail for $10-15?
It's selection, actually. Prior to the '70s, if you ran, you ran in tennis shoes and were naturally talented enough to bear it. Everyone with less-than-perfect form was selected out by injury. Some Olympians run barefoot: they're the 0.00001% of humanity most genetically fit to run.
Now injuries are rising because of much greater participation in running. People who have no business running by their natural body are now out there with technology filling in the gaps, and the technology isn't always a good match. In my experience you are almost certain to injured by shoes contrary to your needs. Pronation is the obvious trait separating shoes for supinators/neutrals/pronators, but you should also look at firmness of the shoe and the motion of the shoe, i.e. does it push you towards your heel or towards your forefoot. Having a poor match will amplify whatever problem you have.
If you run and are being repeatedly injured, you want to speak with someone who knows running shoes. Bring in your old shoes, to examine the wear pattern. You can also do gait analysis at many large running stores or a sports physiologist, though I don't know if it's worth it. Personally when I got into running, I wore soft (mushy, really) shoes that pushed to the heel and were for supinators, which I am. I was repeatedly injured and in the end fin I am happy with some very hard, rigid Zoom Airs that are basically neutral and have a very quick motion from midfoot to forefoot.
The Army has long wanted to air-drop tanks into combat alongside paratroopers. One of the big weaknesses of airborne operations are that such light troops lack much offensive punch and are vulnerable to enemy armor attacking them. See the M551 Sheridan light tank.
Your share of the game's development budget will be measured in cents, unless you're rich. What's wrong with inspiring a generation of kids for that little money? I'd imagine many intelligent people went into aerospace after Apollo and so made our lives better far in excess of what was spent.
You totally miss the point. Having one product from a company compete against another product from the same company and calling it a competitive marketplace is a joke.
For an end-user looking for a commodity, consumer computer, the "just works" straight from the box variety, there is no viable alternative for Microsoft.
Therefore, their requiring that she buy two of her products in order to use one is a ridiculous abuse of their monopoloy power.
It seems likely that their government would just buy from ISVs in another country. Microsoft can't see it, can't stop it, can't be held liable. Remember the recent case of HP selling a significant amount of printers to Iran in just such a way?
Slashdot Mirror
You may have an anger problem. Also, reading comprehension: he said that this test is likely to detect tumors that do no harm to you, but medicine being medicine, any tumor is likely to be treated so aggressively as to cause harm to you thru side-effects. That makes great sense.
No the author has ignored the terms of the license and stolen their work. To be okay, he would need to have given its authors credit, and said that it is licensed GFDL/CC and so you too can use it. He can charge for a reproduction if he wants, cost is not relevant; but freedom and acknowledgement are necessary.
Telephone companies like unlimited local etc. calling because they've found that tracking each little usage of a minute here, fifteen minutes there, for all of their subscribers is not worth the cost of the bureaucracy and systems needed. They are then renting the line, not any physical good that can diminish, like water or electricity. It's much the same situation with ISPs. Their tiered plans have rates ridiculously profitable, and if those rates were brought back to something reasonable for the cost involved, flat plans would still be attractive for everyone involved.
I was recently watching Hulu and saw an ad for what I first thought might be Firefox. Turns out it was Chrome, which is too bad (we already know Google can advertise). It seems like the perfect space to advertise for Firefox or, better yet, a Linux distribution. You know people there are somewhat tech savvy, and frankly for whatever your friend says, having professionally-produced advertisements on respectable places like Hulu stamp "Ubuntu" into your consciousness means a lot for acceptance.
You don't understand addiction if you think it something to be fought with logical persuasion. And you are probably normal in saying to ditch him, but really, I'm disgusted by how callous people are today. Friendships and relationships involve a little inconvenience, not just saying, 'well, I told him it's a bad idea, fuck him!'
Experimenting by delaying a pageload for 500ms is worthy of ethical considerations? Would you like to sue Microsoft for emotional damage? Too many people are afraid of doing anything these days.
Look at some of the other awful shit this esteemed publication has put out:
The People's Republic of China claims to have invented the world's first completely unhackable operating system. The project, known as Kylin, is supposed to keep the evil running dog imperialist pigs from stealing all those glorous technological secrets that have made China the centre of technological development. Or at least those that its workers have used their superior technological skill to half inch from foreign servers.
Interesting but it's all really simple and looks prewritten. Try where do you live, who are you, what do you like, what can you do.
This has all the empty hyperbole and hubris of the dot com bubble. I wish these preening fools just quietly made it work.
-1 crazed conspiracy theory
Your save the world, fuck the rules, and money means nothing attitude makes me cringe. You may really burn yourself here. Life isn't some television show. Providing for yourself or being broke is not a joke.
This is a VM integrated graphically into the Win7 GUI. FTA: "Most of the features called Windows XP Mode are really features of the new Windows Virtual PC." Their "virtual application support" for the top Win7 editions just makes it more convenient.
It was said in a BBC News article a few days ago, which I can't find at the moment, that Mexico has so many deaths because there is a culture that you go to the doctor only as a last resort, and by then the infected people are really bad.
You absolutely in no circumstances can ethically give a healthy person mind-altering substances without their consent... People quoted who say it's interesting for potential are on a massive ego trip.
"Spanish flu" came about because all countries infected before Spain were at war and had press censorship in place. Therefore, the first real public record of the pandemic was in Spain...
That's silly. Look, GDP measures economic activity. Research and development is a form of investment in technology, which is one of the forces in economic growth. Because not all or even most investment is done by the government, investment is best measured by GDP rather than government budget.
Is 7% a "high" death rate?
Wikipedia has normal flu mortality at 0.1%.
People may be interested in the book The Great Influenza: The Epic Story of the Deadliest Plague In History on the Spanish flu.
It mentions that these killer strains of flu are an anomaly in a virus that mutates rapidly, and so the general trend is for an outbreak to become less and less deadly as it continues (i.e., subsequent generations revert to the mean). Also, there were multiple strains in play at different times during the whole 1918-1920 crisis.
Is fifteen cents per page a normal on-demand charge? Books with nothing special about them will cost a few dollars to print conventionally. Blackwell's costs are higher I'm sure and they have the retail share as well. But still, $55 for a book that might otherwise retail for $10-15?
It's selection, actually. Prior to the '70s, if you ran, you ran in tennis shoes and were naturally talented enough to bear it. Everyone with less-than-perfect form was selected out by injury. Some Olympians run barefoot: they're the 0.00001% of humanity most genetically fit to run. Now injuries are rising because of much greater participation in running. People who have no business running by their natural body are now out there with technology filling in the gaps, and the technology isn't always a good match. In my experience you are almost certain to injured by shoes contrary to your needs. Pronation is the obvious trait separating shoes for supinators/neutrals/pronators, but you should also look at firmness of the shoe and the motion of the shoe, i.e. does it push you towards your heel or towards your forefoot. Having a poor match will amplify whatever problem you have. If you run and are being repeatedly injured, you want to speak with someone who knows running shoes. Bring in your old shoes, to examine the wear pattern. You can also do gait analysis at many large running stores or a sports physiologist, though I don't know if it's worth it. Personally when I got into running, I wore soft (mushy, really) shoes that pushed to the heel and were for supinators, which I am. I was repeatedly injured and in the end fin I am happy with some very hard, rigid Zoom Airs that are basically neutral and have a very quick motion from midfoot to forefoot.
The Army has long wanted to air-drop tanks into combat alongside paratroopers. One of the big weaknesses of airborne operations are that such light troops lack much offensive punch and are vulnerable to enemy armor attacking them. See the M551 Sheridan light tank.
Is there anything about the culture or government in the UK and Australia that makes them so prone to using CCTV, censorship, and all of this?
Your share of the game's development budget will be measured in cents, unless you're rich. What's wrong with inspiring a generation of kids for that little money? I'd imagine many intelligent people went into aerospace after Apollo and so made our lives better far in excess of what was spent.
You totally miss the point. Having one product from a company compete against another product from the same company and calling it a competitive marketplace is a joke. For an end-user looking for a commodity, consumer computer, the "just works" straight from the box variety, there is no viable alternative for Microsoft. Therefore, their requiring that she buy two of her products in order to use one is a ridiculous abuse of their monopoloy power.
It seems likely that their government would just buy from ISVs in another country. Microsoft can't see it, can't stop it, can't be held liable. Remember the recent case of HP selling a significant amount of printers to Iran in just such a way?