Slashdot Mirror


Apple May Bring a Non-iPhone To Verizon Wireless

The Narrative Fallacy writes "According to BusinessWeek, Verizon Wireless is in talks with Apple to distribute two new iPhone-like devices that are not iPhones. (Apple has created prototypes.) AT&T's contract with Apple, which has not been made public, is believed to cover all models of the iPhone, but only the iPhone. So if Apple builds something that isn't an iPhone — and perhaps doesn't even make cellular calls — they won't be violating their exclusivity contract with AT&T, which runs through at least 2010. One device is a smaller, less expensive calling device described by a person who has seen it as an 'iPhone lite.' The other is a media pad, said to be smaller than a Kindle but with a bigger screen, that would let users listen to music, view photos, watch high-definition videos, and make calls over a Wi-Fi connection. (And read books?) Apple could use the prospect of an iPhone-esque device as leverage to prevent Verizon Wireless from introducing the Palm Pre, or at least to delay its introduction on Verizon's network. 'The media pad category might go to Verizon,' said one person who has seen the device. 'We are talking about a device where people will say, "Damn, why didn't we do this?" Apple is probably going to define the damn category.'" Reader stevegee58 writes with word that Verizon may be playing both ends against the middle. Marketwatch reports that Microsoft and Verizon are in talks to develop a touch-screen mobile phone that would run on Windows Mobile.

45 of 194 comments (clear)

  1. FTW by lessthanpi · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's amazing how much apple dominates. It's iPod controls 73% of the market share of mp3 players and is the second leading smart phone vendor in the U.S.S.A. There is no stopping them. Antitrust measures should be taken immediately.

    --
    One man with a gun can control 100 without one
    1. Re:FTW by justindarc · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who let Ballmer in here!?

    2. Re:FTW by penguinstorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure that's really "funny" as it's been modded. Anti-Trust measures WERE being considered against Apple in some jurisdictions, on the basis of Apple's iTunes DRM.

      When Apple dropped DRM those calling for anti-trust prosecutions basically lost any grounds on which to fight. The iTunes Music Store doesn't lock you into an iPod anymore...you can play what you buy anywhere and your iPod can play tunes purchased from anywhere. iPods are a bit locked to iTunes in terms of loading data onto it, but there's lots of ways around that and Apple's not the first company to only support one piece of software for loading music...

      Now, on the VIDEO side there's still the DRM issues to content with/resolve in a legal sense but that's as much a reality of the HDCP lobby as it is anything to do with Apple.

      --
      Skot Nelson music is my saviour / i was maimed by rock and roll
    3. Re:FTW by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apple isn't a monopoly though, the competition just plain sucks. Ok, so there are some pretty nice MP3 players that aren't iPods, but they are few and far between, and even then many don't have the features that an iPod does, and then there's no MP3 player that comes close to the iPod Touch (aside from game/music hybrids like PSPs and the GP2x). For smart phones, Windows Mobile plain sucks (seriously, you shouldn't have random freeze ups and vendors shouldn't be forced to create another OS on top of WinMo in order to make it usable), Android, while nice and usable (and will undoubtedly be better in the long run) just doesn't have the polish of the iPhone OS in April of 2009, Symbian doesn't really excel in anything, and BlackBerry is devoid of innovation (but I can't really fault Blackberries for that, they after all are more an ultra-reliable corporate phone rather then a geek plaything).

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    4. Re:FTW by JonathanBoyd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How does using m4a lock anyone out of the iTunes Store? Virtually all of Apple's competitors support it in one product or another, which Apple has done nothing to prevent. How is it remotely an anti-trust issue?

  2. Introducing the iFone by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

    The thinnest, lightest fuck you to ATT on the market!

  3. Wow. by d474 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "A Non-iPhone"

    So this an article that isn't about iPhones, but feels the need to define it in terms of an iPhone.

    (Car analogy time) That's like saying Ford is developing a new Non-Mustang vehicle.

    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    1. Re:Wow. by isaac338 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You miss the point. All it's saying is Apple can make a device strikingly similar to an iPhone but at long as it's not called "iPhone" it's not required to be on AT&T.

    2. Re:Wow. by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 3, Funny

      That hurt my head. I'm going to go lie down now.

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    3. Re:Wow. by Chabo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It'd be more like if Ford had a contract with a certain steel company to produce all steel for the Mustang until 2015, and Ford one day announces that they're making a new car that has exactly the same components as the Mustang, but isn't officially a Mustang, so they aren't contractually obligated to keep the same steel supplier.

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
  4. So by captnbmoore · · Score: 2, Funny

    That would make my Orange an Apple. Sweet.

    --
    The Navy Motto "IF it ain't broke Fix It" "A day is wasted if you don't learn something new"
  5. Palm Pre by get+quad · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I dont own an iPhone because it doesn't have a tactile keyboard. I believe that when Verizon realizes how much of a gimmick the Blackberry Storm was and finally picks up the Palm Pre, AT&T will lose millions of customers to Verizon/Palm.

    --
    "To err is human, to mod Funny divine."
    1. Re:Palm Pre by slyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Palm Pre needs to come out first for that particular plan to work.

    2. Re:Palm Pre by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Funny

      I dont own an iPhone because it doesn't have a tactile keyboard.

      The iPhone 3.0 software enables the 'Spring Surprise' tactile feedback:
      Two steel bolts that, upon the activation of the keyboard, spring outward and pierce the user's hands and fingers.

    3. Re:Palm Pre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lose some weight, then, fatty.

    4. Re:Palm Pre by Threni · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > *That is, of course if you don't want to do things that Apple says that you can't do such as emulators, using "undocumented" features, or
      > "obscene" applications, but that is what jailbreaking is for, right?

      That, or just getting a phone which supports Windows Mobile, Symbian or Java apps.

    5. Re:Palm Pre by moosesocks · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Palm Pre needs to come out first for that particular plan to work.

      Palm needs to break their exclusivity agreement with Sprint for that particular plan to work.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  6. Sounds familiar by tylersoze · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This sounds an awful like what Jobs did when he decided to kill off the clone makers after he came back as CEO. They had a license for OS 8, so he just changed the name to OS 9.

    1. Re:Sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      My father fought in the clone wars. But he was betrayed by a Sith lord named Steve.

    2. Re:Sounds familiar by Phroggy · · Score: 4, Funny

      This sounds an awful like what Jobs did when he decided to kill off the clone makers after he came back as CEO. They had a license for OS 8, so he just changed the name to OS 9.

      To be fair, it's not like going from 7.5 to 7.6 to 8.0 to 8.1 to 8.5 to 8.6 to 9.0 was a completely shocking progression.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    3. Re:Sounds familiar by macshome · · Score: 2, Informative

      So close!

      Back then the Mac ran on "System" whatever. System 3, System 6, System 7, you get the idea.

      The clone license covered System 7, so they changed the name to Mac OS and revved the number to 8, just to be sure.

    4. Re:Sounds familiar by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Informative

      So close! Back then the Mac ran on "System" whatever. System 3, System 6, System 7, you get the idea. The clone license covered System 7, so they changed the name to Mac OS and revved the number to 8, just to be sure.

      Not quite: The last OS for the clones was MacOS 7.6(.1).

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  7. Me want a TouchBook and here's why by Lord+Satri · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hope the 'Media Pad / TouchBook' end up being true. Because it would be a product that would be useful to me.

    I don't want a laptop. I have an old one, and even if my old iBook is rather small, over the years, I realized that it's not small enough for a lot of uses. Example: we don't use it at the dinner table to refer to Wikipedia and I don't bring it often when going to friends and family unless I know I'm going to use it because it's slightly too big and heavy.

    On the other end, there's the iPod Touch and the like. Doubtlessly useful, and despite not owning one (I really try to buy as little stuff as possible because 'the things you own end up owning you' ;-), I fear the screen is too small to enjoy it as an input device (very small virtual keyboard) and media device (small screen too). On the plus side, smartphones / iPod Touch *are* really portable, and to a level that won't be attained by any "media pad".

    NetBooks. Almost, but I don't think they're for me yet. Waiting for the next wave. Why? It's not really a laptop but it's not really that portable either. (that's obviously subjective)

    And last but not least, Apple products integration. I don't consider myself a fanboy, but I want to be productive. Despite using Debian at work everyday, Linux is still not up to my expectations yet (yet!). Is there some lock-in with Apple? Yes. Is this a problem with me? Not that much, as long at it doesn't get in my way too often. I'm ready to pay to have more pleasure using a computer. I don't want crap, even if it's free. (this is a general statement, not specifically related to software)

    Now, I guess I did not need to write all this other than to have feedback from you: what do you think? Where am I wrong?

    1. Re:Me want a TouchBook and here's why by Annorax · · Score: 2

      I'm ready to pay to have more pleasure using a computer. I don't want crap, even if it's free.

      And the sad thing is that for the longest time I was paying for crap that would mysteriously stop working and force me to blow an entire evening trying to tweak drivers and the OS to start working properly again. I finally got fed up with tinkering. Sure, tinkering was fun for quite a while, but when it started to get in the way of creative work done on a computer then that's where I had to draw a line.

      I bought my cast aluminum sliver of a machine a year ago March and have been very happy not having to worry if the video driver is going to hang or WiFi stack crash on me again.

  8. I can see the marketing campaign now by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Say yes to the new Apple ayePhone! Now available on Verizon Wireless!"

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  9. Re:This sounds exciting... by cawpin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's odd. I have a Samsung Omnia and it's the best phone I've ever owned. The screen response isn't as good as the iPhone's, but nothing else is either. The Omnia is #2. It also allows me to do things for free the iPhone can't, such as SSH and VNC, flawlessly. Its camera is also the best I've used on a phone and, at 5MP, has plenty of resolution.

  10. Re:This sounds exciting... by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Exactly. In the USA there are no perfect phones. The perfect phone would be:

    Full Keyboard and Captive touchscreen
    Decent enough resolution camera with built-in video recording
    Copy/Paste
    Bluetooth Tethering
    Full Bluetooth features
    Built-in GPS
    An OS with the ability to easily add in software from any source (and the official source must not have stupid restrictions like the app store on the iPhone)
    A decent media player with all major codecs supported
    Flash, and if not Flash then YouTube and other video site viewers as applications
    Wi-Fi
    MMS
    Not painful to use browser
    Standard USB port
    Standard headphone jack

    As of yet no phone even comes close to that. Sure, the G1 is a great phone, yet it has so many easy to fix flaws such as the lack of a standard headphone jack. The iPhone is a great phone, but it has the stupidest design issues such as the lack of basic features like MMS, copy/paste, multiple codecs for audio and video (OGG is a no brainer), lack of Flash along with usability issues such as the application "approval" process and the lack of a decent camera (with no zoom or video recording features).

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  11. THIS makes sense by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The back story here is that verizon is switching away from CDMA. they are expected however to maintain CDMA for voice and phase in the new network for data. Apple has said they are not eager to develop for CDMA since it has no future.

    So if apple came out with a data device, say a netbook, for verizon it could run on the new network and not bother with CDMA.

    makes total sense.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:THIS makes sense by maxume · · Score: 3, Informative

      In an attempt to keep things exciting, most 3g technologies use a CDMA (or W-CDMA) carrier.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  12. Re:Verizon + Microsoft + Windows Mobile = FAIL by c_forq · · Score: 3, Interesting

    does it really cost $95 a month for all that stuff?

    I think it actually may, in a way. Last I saw iPhone users were using WAY more data than users of AT&T's other phones. I've heard AT&T has struggled to keep up with this in some locations. Think of the $95 a month as keeping out the vast hordes that would rape and pillage their inadequate infrastructure. So for someone to compete on this aspect I think they would have to have a much more robust network with plenty of bandwidth room.

    --
    Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
  13. And the great thing about the iPhone is... by magsol · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...if you want to market it to another company under a different name, there's even an app for that.

    --
    "I'd just like to emphasise that taking a million years isn't a metaphor here..." -Rich Bradshaw
  14. Enough with the rumors by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Firstly, let's hang up the old rumor mill and improve the S/N ratio.
    Secondly, roughlydrafted.com has a pretty insight into why this is probably not going to happen.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  15. I can see it now by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The other is a media pad, said to be smaller than a Kindle but with a bigger screen, that would let users listen to music, view photos, watch high-definition videos... Just what we need! The current iPhone is way too small for watching pr0n while driving! Why not just build in a projector and project the picture on the windshield instead?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  16. Re:WTF is wrong with Microsoft? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean seriously. They got the market clout AND a touch/non-touch version of WinCE on tap. For as bad as eveyone thinks the Zune is, at the very least, it shows THEY CAN DO IT.

    I don't know about that track record. So far Microsoft efforts on consumer electronics have been successful when MS is willing to take heavy losses (Xbox: -$7 billion over the lifetime of the Xbox and Xbox 360) or not as successful (Zune: small profit for a year then losses). No I am not counting keyboards and mice which are not quite as complex as consoles or MP3 players. Even in the realm of mobile phones MS is losing money and marketshare. MS started in the industry back in 1999, and even with a 8 year head start, Apple has overtaken them in marketshare within 2 years.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  17. Sounds like wishful thinking by qazwart · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Two things: Apple doesn't do cheap, so a iPhone Lite is out of the question. Same with the "media pad". Nor, does Verizon allow third parties to do whatever they want. Verizon isn't going to have a WiFi only device that's not going to get people to sign up for Verizon. Nor, do I think Apple wants to work with CDMA which is now officially an obsolete technology. Apple will stick with AT&T which allows Apple to do whatever they want on Apple's terms. Verizon doesn't need Apple. AT&T does. I do predict that Apple will come out with a "Netbook" like device based upon the iPhone OS. It will probably have a keyboard, but no mouse.

  18. Re:This sounds exciting... by Chabo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One of my CS professors in college said something I wrote down, because it was a great quote, especially since he has a very thick Czech accent. Here's the quote, with all grammatical mistakes intact:

    "When you pick up phone at your house, it just works. You don't wait two minutes to boot up, then it gives you blue screen of death."

    --
    Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
  19. I call BS by forgoil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This whole things reeks of making-stuff-up!

  20. Call it the Newton Phone by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    or the Mac Phone.

    It would be interesting if the phone was based on the old Apple Newton device. Apple could claim IP back to the Newton before a lot of these "Smart Phones" got invented.

    It only makes sense as Microsoft used Windows CE in their smart phones, that Apple recycles the Newton into a Newton phone. You got that IP there, and it can be modified to run on ARM processors, and it pre-dates the iPhone.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Call it the Newton Phone by macshome · · Score: 3, Interesting

      FWIW, the Newtons did run on ARM processors.

  21. Re:This sounds exciting... by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, in other words, you want a laptop.

  22. Re:Question by PunditGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    His/her post wasn't entitled to much of anything. It was titled "Question."

    Douche.

  23. Re:This sounds exciting... by illumin8 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Omnia is #2. It also allows me to do things for free the iPhone can't, such as SSH and VNC, flawlessly.

    You should be aware that the iPhone can do those things with a 3rd party app.

    --
    "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  24. Re:This sounds exciting... by illumin8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As of yet no phone even comes close to that.

    Actually, the iPhone has all of those except tactile keyboard, copy/paste, tethering, MMS, and Ogg support. If you count the upcoming release of the iPhone OS, you'll only be missing a tactile keyboard and Ogg support.

    Seriously, why do people get so hung up on Ogg support? Less than 1/10th of 1 percent of digital music listeners even know what it is or care to use it, so why should Apple support it? DRM free AAC is good enough quality and unencumbered enough to use (unencumbered as in Apple pays for the license so wtf do I care?).

    --
    "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  25. Serious Verizon/WinMo WTFs by mcrbids · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have a touchscreen phone that uses Windows Mobile. It's the HTC mogul and it's a damned sweet phone when you load it up with SkyFire browser. (IE mobile takes suck to whole new levels)

    I browse and post on slashdot/digg/reddit/etc, watch movies on hulu, play mp3s and all that jazz but unlike the iPhone, it has a real keyboard that doesn't suck to type on. (touch screen keyboards blow HARD)

    It's a pretty awesome phone. But dangit, it's still windows with all its suck. The interface is inconsistent, laggy, it runs out of memory when you run too many progs at a time, and it just crashes about 1x/week without warning. Oh, and there's no spider solitaire.

    It's a great phone except for the windows part.

    It was great irony this morning... using Outlook mobile, Exchange (Zimbra) and Office mobile, it refused to open a word document in an email because it might 'harm my system'. Something ironic about MS' product telling me that another of their products is dangerous to use?

    I opened it w/my Linux laptop, Kmail, and Open Office just fine, thank you!

    PS: I typed this post on said phone. Verizon is developing a touch screen phone? What am I using, then?

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  26. Re:This sounds exciting... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Informative

    The iPhone has free SSH and VNC apps. I have them installed.

    5 MP in a cell phone is fooling yourself. Zoom one of those pictures up and inspect it pixel by pixel. You MIGHT be getting 2 MP effective resolution. Everything else is just wasting memory capturing lens blur.