Slashdot Mirror


Windows 7 Will Be Free For a Year

Barence writes "Microsoft is effectively giving away Windows 7 free for a year with the launch of the Release Candidate. The Release Candidate is now available to MSDN and TechNet subscribers, and will go on unlimited, general release on 5 May. The software will not expire until 1 June 2010, giving testers more than a year's free access to Windows 7. 'It's available to as many people who see fit to use it, although we wouldn't recommend it to just your average user,' John Curran, director of the Windows Client Group told PC Pro. 'We'd very strongly encourage anyone on the beta to move to the Release Candidate.'"

36 of 528 comments (clear)

  1. Good idea by 4D6963 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds like a good idea to me! Can't think of anything wrong with it, but I trust someone will come up with something.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:Good idea by platypussrex · · Score: 5, Funny

      Didn't your mom warn you about that? "They give you one for free, and then when they have you hooked....wham!"

    2. Re:Good idea by just_another_sean · · Score: 5, Insightful

      OK, I'll bite.

      This reminds of what Bill G. said about people illegally using Windows in China. MS would rather give you the first hit free
      so you get hooked. When you come crawling back for more to feed your habit then they'll charge you for it.

      Sorry but MS has violated the publics trust so many times I just can't ever see anything good in their marketing attempts.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    3. Re:Good idea by frozentier · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, to me it sounds more like confidence than desperation. They are expecting people to go out and pay for it AFTER using it for a year and deciding if they like it or not. Quite the opposite of going out and buying a new OS, then you're S.O.L. if you don't like it, and you've wasted $100+.

    4. Re:Good idea by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 5, Funny

      First they start you on 7, then Windows Server and Vista, and before you know it you have a full install of Windows ME.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    5. Re:Good idea by Gerzel · · Score: 4, Funny

      ME if you're lucky. MS Bob if you're not.

    6. Re:Good idea by DaleGlass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Microsoft doesn't need people to buy their OS. It's not like they have much of a choice anyway.

      What they really need is to get people to stop replacing it with an older version, and to stop trying to get the older one on their new hardware.

    7. Re:Good idea by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, to me it sounds more like confidence than desperation. They are expecting people to go out and pay for it AFTER using it for a year and deciding if they like it or not. Quite the opposite of going out and buying a new OS, then you're S.O.L. if you don't like it, and you've wasted $100+.

      Its about getting developers to decide that the platform is worth developing software for. If developers decide due to low market penetration that Windows 7 is as appealing to write for as Mac OS9, the money train will end and Microsoft will most likely fail as a company.

      Personally, I don't consider them to be particularly relevant anymore. The exciting new technology doesn't come from Microsoft anymore, and hasn't in years...

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    8. Re:Good idea by Danse · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Personally, I don't consider them to be particularly relevant anymore. The exciting new technology doesn't come from Microsoft anymore, and hasn't in years...

      Yeah, but it's kind of hard to consider having ~90% of the market to be irrelevant. They may not be the hip new thing, but they're definitely relevant to most people.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    9. Re:Good idea by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Of course it would never have happened if linux weren't good on the desktop.

      Yes, it's "good on the desktop" but there are still quite a few important applications for which there is no Linux app that can do the job. This is especially true in the area of media production.

      I would have switched to Linux long ago if there was any possible way I could get my work done on it. In fact, every time there's a new version of Ubuntu Studio, I try it out on a machine in my studio that's just for that purpose. And every time, I realize that there is simply no Linux substitute for the most critical apps I use. And I'm not talking about something that's so esoteric for there not to be a market. There are more than a dozen companies that produce DAW applications for Mac and/or Windows, for example: Steinberg, Cakewalk, Propellerheads, MOTU, bias, Cockos, Avid, Sony, Native Instruments, MAGIX, Ableton, and hundreds of companies who create virtual instruments to use in these DAWs.

      How many of them have apps for Linux? Maybe one. How many of those apps for Linux actually work? Maybe none. Cockos' Reaper makes interesting use of Linux machines for offloading resource-hungry processes like rendering, so I can make use that Linux machine, but it is impossible for a professional media producer to use Linux exclusively. And if you're one of the hundreds of thousands of "amateur" or hobbyist media producers, which platform are you going to choose? One on which you can produce something or one on which you cannot.

      A similar accounting can be had for video production. So, if Linux is going to make any inroads into this small but important market, professional developers are going to have to be persuaded to develop for Linux.

      I'm a broken record about this, but there is a significant need for another professional, well-funded OS in the personal computing market. The need might not be so great if Apple were to produce an OS that was not proprietary to their own hardware. If they can make a "non-iPhone" iPhone for Verizon to sell, then they can produce a "non-Macintosh" OSX. As well capitalized and run as Apple is, they'd clobber Windows. If Apple had such an OS on the shelves last year when Vista was tanking, they would own the PC OS market today. Instead they continue to target elitists and fashionistas. They'll stay rich, god bless them, but as consumers we have to think about what we need, not just brand loyalty.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re:Good idea by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The only thing is, I've had Vista on a testing machine since its first public beta, just so I can track the progress they're making with it. I put the first public beta of Windows 7 on my laptop and used it for a while. Both are... fine.

      But then I had a problem with my laptop and so I wiped it out and reinstalled Windows XP. You know what? I didn't have any problems in downgrading. What I mean is, there wasn't anything after downgrading where I said, "Shoot, I wish I could do this, but XP doesn't have that functionality, so I need to upgrade again." At least not so far.

      If Microsoft wants me to pay for an upgrade, they're going to have to show me something more than what I've seen so far.

    11. Re:Good idea by geekboy642 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Again, ~90% of the market.
      If I could put that in bold 72pt flashing courier, I would. You cannot not develop for 90% of the market because you don't like their OS. This (the unwarranted elitism) is a sickness, and it's endemic to the free software community. Whether or not you like Windows/Microsoft makes precisely zero difference. If you want to be mainstream, you cater to those in the mainstream. If you want to be a pathetic niche, that's fine, nobody will stop you. But when your tunnel vision gets so strong that you equate people using the dominant PC/OS setup as "not really that relevant", you harm yourself, and you harm everyone that tries to rely on the work you do.

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
  2. At least a year by sskagent · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well it will take me at least a year to get all my drivers updated and installed, so this really doesn't help me.

  3. XP Free for a year? by mc1138 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Will this include XP as a VM for a year as well?

    1. Re:XP Free for a year? by Ritorix · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes.

      "We will be soon releasing the beta of Windows XP Mode and Windows Virtual PC for Windows 7 Professional and Windows 7 Ultimate."
      http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/business/archive/2009/04/24/coming-soon-windows-xp-mode-and-windows-virtual-pc.aspx

      "As part of the upcoming Windows 7 Release Candidate milestone, Microsoft will release a beta version of Windows XP Mode"
      http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2009/Apr09/04-28Win7QA.mspx

  4. Ballmer's strategy by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This could be Ballmer's strategy against Linux as he repeatedly has said that you can't beat Linux' price.

    With this they will surely retain the market share, in a recession, for an otherwise very expensive product; it costs more than one third of a new pc.

    1. Re:Ballmer's strategy by tero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it's more likely that this is Ballmer's strategy against his own failings with Vista.

      They're in desperate need of getting people off XP - it's starting to show it's age from marketing point of view and I'm sure MS would like to move to a new technological platform as well.

      It's also nice to see they've really looked at things that went wrong with Vista launch - I don't think they really can afford to bomb Windows 7 launch.

  5. Re:its not free by jtdennis · · Score: 4, Informative

    The public beta will be out May 5th. Paying for MSDN or Technet gets you early access. I wouldn't have a Technet account except my work got it as part of their MS license deal.

    --
    -- "Freedom is the right of all sentient beings" -Optimus Prime
  6. Re:So close... by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...waiting for blue face of death...

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  7. Re:Offline Gaming machine by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your 4-year-old's account shouldn't have administrator access.

    If you gave his account administrator access, neither should you.

    Funny you should say that. A while ago I took my four year old daughter to a museum, and let her play with a touch-screen information terminal. In a couple of seconds she (somehow) had control panel up! It may take a thousand monkeys a million years to write Shakespeare, but it seems to take ten seconds for a four-year old to find any "backdoor access" or other options that should not be available.

  8. Re:Fascinating by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It sounds like you don't like the idea. It's good that you're not forced to take them up on it.

    Unsuccessful troll is unsuccessful.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  9. Free with "minor" caveats by Ralish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Microsoft is effectively giving away Windows 7 free for a year with the launch of the Release Candidate.

    It's only free if you don't value bug fixes, security updates, product support and potentially all manner of issues installing software that will be released for Windows 7 RTM on a pre-release version no-one will have done significant product testing on and won't care to help you with if you run into problems.

    Keeping all this in mind, and the fact this is pre-release development code, it's not hard to see why this release is free. I do find it odd that it's got such a generous expiration date, but approaching this as a free (time-limited) lunch is probably a fairly bad idea for all the reasons above.

    If you like it, but don't want to pay for it, just pirate it. You'll be better off, and so may many others when they don't have to worry about your compromised box congesting their network, because it was exploited by a flaw MS has no intention of fixing in pre-release code.

  10. Re:Fascinating by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually the Win7 RC doesn't have any path to the full, licenced version of Win7 at the end of the testing period, because it's released for testing, not as a freebie.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  11. You've got to love this by FritzSolms · · Score: 5, Funny

    Absolutely love this on today's BBC article on Windows 7. "We were able to shave 400 milliseconds off the shutdown time by slightly trimming the WAV file shutdown music. "It's indicative of really the level and detail and scrutiny on Windows 7."

    1. Re:You've got to love this by Shrike82 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You can mock it all you want. Those 400 milliseconds will add up, and after a few years you'll have saved enough time to make a cup of coffee, or chat to a co-worker about your plans for the weekend.

      Man, that's something to look forward to...

      --
      You can advertise in this sig from as little as £99.99 a month!
    2. Re:You've got to love this by idontgno · · Score: 5, Funny

      "We were able to shave 400 milliseconds off the shutdown time

      BRILLIANT!

      That will easily save me.... let's see... um... (google math)... 7.2 seconds in the coming year! YES! Time enough for sex!

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  12. Death to Pirates? by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Windows a gateway drug?

    No it's more of a Dell drug.

    This is actually a wonderful idea for them. it lowers the barrier for the transition. Even companies can push their costs forward in time.

    But i'm thinking of all the pirates in asia. The street vendors with virus laden bootlegs will be competing against free. this will hurt their market. Then a year later what will the chinese consumer do? He could go out an buy a bootleg and re-install his system or he could buy a keycode and continue with his current system state. in many cases the idea of re-installing a system would be daunting enough to suddenly make the key code seem cheap.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Death to Pirates? by dov_0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If my experience with Asians from less wealthy nations (esp. Sth East Asians) is worth anything, the majority of them will still just buy bootleg as that is the only system they really know or its just the way they do things. Unless they actually see a real reason to download 3gig or more, burn it to a DVD etc they'll just go to the market and buy a bootleg for 40 rupees (call it a dollar).

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
  13. Competing with themselves. by camperdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft isn't concerned about "hooking" people. They accomplished that decades ago. Microsoft's problem is that people are hooked on XP. They spent a whackload of money on Vista, and nobody went for it. (By nobody, I mean corporations. Everybody who bought a new machine was forced to get it, but even then many switched back to XP.) Now, they've spent another whackload of money on Win7, and they want corporations to buy it. They want people to move off of the XP platform. This free windows is the bait to get them to switch.

    Frankly, I don't know if it'll work. Windows XP works fine. It's an operating system. All it has to do is run applications and manage resources. It does that well enough for most people and corporations, so why switch?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  14. Re:Fascinating by cabjf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They're just scared to death that no one will upgrade, just like with Vista. They probably hope that if enough people are trying for free at home, they'll want it at work and on their next computer. Then they might be able to finally sunset XP.

  15. Why such moronic ititles and summaries? by trifish · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They're not giving you Windows 7 for free. They allow anyone to use a beta version of Windows 7 for one year. And, yes, RC is still beta. Microsoft has admitted that they falsely and intentionally label the last few betas as RCs to make hardware vendors to test their hardware and write proper drivers before a RTM build is created.

    The only purpose of this /. submission is to make money on ads or something I suppose (I didn't follow any link, I confess, as I don't follow misleading and moronic articles).

  16. Re:Offline Gaming machine by houghi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please ask her to document it. ;-)

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  17. You know you failed... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...when you give something away for free, and people don't want it anyway. ^^

    (Ignore their obviously coming "OMFG! It sells like crazy!!1!one(lim x->0 ((sin x)/x))" messages. They did that with Vista too. And look how it turned out.)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  18. Re:So close... by not+already+in+use · · Score: 4, Funny

    It amazes me what passes for funny around here.

    --
    Similes are like metaphors
  19. Re:Fascinating by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think this not-switching thing won't happen. 7 is worlds better than that steaming pile o'Vista.

    It's actually fast, as crazy as this sounds.

    --
    Send your spendthrift head of state this
  20. Living outside the Slashdot bubble by westlake · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What they really need is to get people to stop replacing it with an older version, and to stop trying to get the older one on their new hardware.

    Vista is approaching a 25% share of the market.

    Top Operating System Share Trend

    It's easy to imagine a 10% decline in XP's share and a 10% increase in Vista's share May-to-May.

    The geek looks in the mirror and thinks that he is representative of the mass consumer market.

    The HP desktop from WalMart is quad core and ships with 6 GB RAM and 64 Bit Vista. In six months - nine months, whatever - it will be an i7 with 9 GB RAM.

    Serious horsepower at a mass market price. Mature 64 bit drivers. Win 7 just around the corner.

    What's not to love?

    Dual-core is Coming Soon to a netbook near you. It won't be long before XP stops making sense even at entry level.