Slashdot Mirror


Klingons Cut From Final Star Trek XI Movie

darthcamaro writes "Classic era trek was all about Kirk kicking the Klingons' tails. But the new Star Trek XI movie, the reboot, will not have any spoken Klingon in it — a travesty that has some fan sites up in arms already. 'We actually had a sequence that ended up getting cut from the movie that took place on Rura Penthe, in a Klingon prison,' Star Trek co-writer Alex Kurtzman said, explaining the deletion. 'And there was definitely Klingon spoken in the movie, and it ended up getting cut.' Frakkin' Federation ..."

17 of 447 comments (clear)

  1. What's the Klingon phrase for... by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Get a life"?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:What's the Klingon phrase for... by idontgno · · Score: 5, Insightful

      tlhap yIn!

      (per http://www.mrklingon.org/ ; java applet warning!)

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:What's the Klingon phrase for... by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Especially since the deleted scene will probably appear in the "deluxe director's cut" DVD anyways.

    3. Re:What's the Klingon phrase for... by Criliric · · Score: 4, Insightful

      why hasn't anyone thought of this?

    4. Re:What's the Klingon phrase for... by palindrome · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because the level of irony created in anyone wearing it would destroy time.

  2. Travesty? by cheebie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh dear God.

    The original Trek only rarely dealt with the Klingons. It was more about the crew exploring the unknown.

    This is just a fanboi snit.

    1. Re:Travesty? by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I gotta agree. While the MOVIES generated from the original series dealt pretty heavily with Klingons, the actual TV series didn't go much into it. And TBH, the Klingons of the original TV series were pretty uninteresting IMHO. The change that they started going into the movies and more or less finalized moving into TNG made them far more interesting. Also, to a whole ton of fans from the TNG-onward days kinda view the Klingons as buddies of the Federation. Seeing them put back into a negative light just wouldn't be interesting to me.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    2. Re:Travesty? by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Weren't the Klingons in TOS basically just bad-tempered humans? They didn't develop the weird growths on their foreheads until much later. They were basically just a poorly fleshed out analogue for the Soviet Union.

    3. Re:Travesty? by timepilot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There was a decent amount of sex and violence in the original trek. It just wasn't explicit.

    4. Re:Travesty? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, closer to the Mongols than the Soviets. One of the ideas floating around in sci-fi of the time was the "space barbarian" or "space mongol", an archetype who could operate space ships, but couldn't build new ones, had to rely on captured peoples, etc. The Klingons definitely look like a stereotype of Mongols, including the warrior culture.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:Travesty? by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. This is, after all, a REBOOT. That means a lot of the cruft from about thirty years of post-ToS development is being dispensed with, and that's fine by me. This is meant to rejuvenate a series that had pretty much become one monstrous cliche of itself. If there's one thing ToS had that, over time, the later series lacked, it was solid, straightforward storytelling. Everything was burdened down by the vast edifice of Everything-That-Had-Come-Before. The last two attempts, the dull Voyager and the increasingly-pathetic Enterprise, showed just how uninteresting it had all become.

      The Trouble With Tribbles was just fine with Klingons speaking English, thank you very much. In fact, and so will this.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Travesty? by guyminuslife · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's a very plausible, reasonable-sounding explanation. Not nearly as plausible and reasonable-sounding as, "Jesus H. Christ! It's not even important! We changed the way they're supposed to look, we didn't even have the make-up budget to do that shit at the time, deal with it, use your imagination, stop worrying about canon and watch the goddamn show!"

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    7. Re:Travesty? by LionMage · · Score: 3, Insightful

      First off, it's rogue. Rouge is makeup you apply to your cheeks (or anywhere else you want a "healthy blush").

      Secondly, if you actually paid attention to the episodes in question (a story arc that lasted 2 or 3 episodes), you would know that the Klingons were going to destroy the research facility to stop the spread of this viral trait. A cure was discovered, and the Klingon powers that be relented. Klingons on a single colony were affected by this trait, and it was implied that the Klingon scientists were going to have their hands full reversing this genetic mangling. It did not spread to the entire Klingon empire.

      Yeah, I know, way too much nit picking about a damn TV show. But I thought the story arc was cool, especially the idea that Noonian Soong's ancestor was actually originally interested in genetic engineering to enhance humans, not robotics or cybernetics.

  3. And..... why should we care? by SDF-7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seems like a non-story to me. Wrath of Khan didn't have any spoken Klingon either (closest was Khan claiming the Klingon proverb: Revenge is a dish best served cold.... It is very cold, in spaaaaaaaaaaace.) I don't seriously think anyone missed it there, and while I know little of the plot of this film (intentionally, so no -- I don't want a summary) if the story doesn't really involve Klingons, no need to toss them in just to have them.

  4. Spider-Man 3 by XanC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Everybody complained that Spider-Man 3 tried to cram too many different characters and plots together. Chill out! This is but the first in a new series of films. There will be plenty of time for Klingons.

  5. Why do the characters even get to hear Klingon? by Gauthic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know I'll be modded down for mentioning this: Why are the Klingons the only species in the whole movie series that the "Universal Translator" didn't automatically translate to both the audience and the characters while not in private conversation at home planet (i.e. TMP's Spock's failture scene)?

    It should be all or nothing. Romulans should speak Romulan, Vulcans speak Vulcan (unless speaking Starfleet English) due to the technomagical universal translator.

  6. Re:They have done far worse by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's nothing quite as amusing as a pedant trying to sound reasonable and non-pedantic, and yet being so incapable of looking from the narrow rut that they occupy on the subject, that it still oozes from every sentence.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.