Slashdot Mirror


Let's Rename Swine Flu As "Colbert Flu"

Bruce Perens writes "The World Health Organization will no longer refer to Virus A(H1N1) as 'Swine Flu,' citing ethnic reactions to 'swine,' for example among middle-eastern cultures who feel that swine are unclean. Or, is it because meat packers are concerned that people might stop eating pork in fear of the virus? WHO suggests that the public select a new name for the virus. I suggest that we all start calling it The Colbert Flu, after the comedian and fake pundit who asked his audience to stuff a NASA poll so that a Space Station module would be named after him. What can we do to make the name stick?"

41 of 607 comments (clear)

  1. Dear Bruce... by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Call it the Colbert flu? I don't think so. Colbert was just being funny, which is his job. It's why people watch him, and why they'll go so far as to stuff a poll. Plus, it was good publicity for the space station, led to an astronaut on his show, and even the naming of some widget or other after him. Treadmill? Whatever.

    Anyway, Colbert is generally a positive influence. His "fake punditry" is pungent social comment, with the intent of nudging the his audience to think about these issues. While being funny, which keeps them coming back. All in all, a good thing. So I don't think naming a killer flu after him is appropriate. Entirely the wrong set of connotations, you see.

    Flus are annoying, they show up wether you want them to or not, right in the middle of something else you were doing. Vaguely similar to your suggestion we name a nasty flu after a cool guy showing up on slashdot.

    So in honor of your annoying and inappropriate post, I'm simply going to counter-suggest that we name H1N1 after you instead: The "Perens Flu." Does that seem fair to you?

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Dear Bruce... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Funny

      Flus are annoying, they show up wether you want them to or not, right in the middle of something else you were doing.

      Ok, so how about The Thompson Flu.

    2. Re:Dear Bruce... by Smidge207 · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about the kdawson flu?

      =Smidge=

      --
      Is it just my observation, or is eldavojohn an idiot?
    3. Re:Dear Bruce... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Heh, Colbert might go for it though...The whole massively self-aggrandizing nature of his stage personality would eat it up.

      Be a lot easier to just call it the "Mexico Influenza" though. That's pretty much the standard for these things.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    4. Re:Dear Bruce... by Thornburg · · Score: 5, Funny

      How about the kdawson flu?

      =Smidge=

      I second that motion.

    5. Re:Dear Bruce... by wjousts · · Score: 5, Funny

      Flus are annoying, they show up wether you want them to or not, right in the middle of something else you were doing.

      Mother-in-law flu?

    6. Re:Dear Bruce... by wjousts · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Anyway, Colbert is generally a positive influence. His "fake punditry" is pungent social comment, with the intent of nudging the his audience to think about these issues. While being funny, which keeps them coming back. All in all, a good thing.

      Good, except some people can't tell the difference

    7. Re:Dear Bruce... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Funny

      Try to exercise a bit of sensitivity... they're concerned that a disease is named after something that is unclean.

      Perhaps they would like the Purity Flu?

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    8. Re:Dear Bruce... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, I felt that with Colbert's desire to have multiple things named after him, the list of things is here, there would be a sort of "symmetry" to naming something that he would not want after him.

      Obviously a simple influenza virus is insufficient to name after me. I'd want to have named after me an itch that you can't reach and slowly drives you crazy.

    9. Re:Dear Bruce... by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Spanish Inquisition flu.
      After all, nobody expected it.

    10. Re:Dear Bruce... by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 4, Funny

      These 2 laws of the holiest of holies this would be breaking!

      One, the ridiculing of the holiest body of christanity, we the inquisition!
      Two, the use of skit material not created by you but created by the holiest body of christianity, we the inquisition!
      And three, the countenance upon which you stated the material... THREE!

      Mark these 3 laws the holiest of holies that thou dost mock!

    11. Re:Dear Bruce... by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Funny

      The difference is that Colbert is actively mocking his stage persona.... Rush Limbaugh, by contrast was always just a pig.

      Hey! Maybe we could call it the Limbaugh Flu....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    12. Re:Dear Bruce... by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why not call it Kung Flu...after all, it does kick your ass pretty well.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    13. Re:Dear Bruce... by Ash+Vince · · Score: 4, Informative

      The thing is: it is swine flu.

      Actually, its not. The original swine flu was not able to jump from human to human, you could only catch it from being in close contact with pigs. This flu is actually two parts swine flu, one part bird flu and one part human flu. Although this is mostly swine, the other elements are what has enabled to it spread through the human population as it never has before.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swine_influenza

      If it was still just good old swine flu, it would not be romping through the human population with reckless abandon.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    14. Re:Dear Bruce... by amliebsch · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would hate to see an America where there was only one party.

      Uh...I've got some bad news for you.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    15. Re:Dear Bruce... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 5, Funny

      This flu is actually two parts swine flu, one part bird flu and one part human flu.

      If this is true then we have no choice but to name it accordingly...

      ...ManBirdPig Flu!!

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  2. Reddit had it right by MBCook · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Bacon Lung"

    Much better name.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Reddit had it right by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      +1 vote for Bacon Lung. That's awesome.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  3. Let's not by decipher_saint · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's call it "H1N1" flu. You know, like, what it is actually called BY SCIENCE!

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:Let's not by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, science doesn't take too kindly to being anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Let's not by Penguinoflight · · Score: 4, Informative

      I assumed it was after "Serenity" from the Firefly series.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    3. Re:Let's not by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't get why anyone would object to "swine flu".

      Let me see if I understand the logic here: You think pigs are unclean, and therefore you object to naming a deadly virus that thrives in unclean environments after them. Wha?

      I could understand objecting to it if it were called "Puppy and Kitty Cat Flu", or if we were trying to name a new translation of the Koran the "Swine Koran", but this is just ridiculous.

    4. Re:Let's not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't get why anyone would object to "swine flu".

      (1) There are some people whose living depends on selling swine-related products.

      (2) People are, in general, dumb.

      Consequently, people may jump to the conclusion that eating swine may result in them getting the flu.

      This is why I'm backing "Mexican flu." If nothing else, it'll cut down on people eating Mexicans.

    5. Re:Let's not by dontmakemethink · · Score: 4, Insightful

      H1N1 is believed to have been initially spread from a rather unkempt pig farm in Mexico, hence the swine flu. However, it isn't the fault of the pigs that the place was so nasty, it was the farmers.

      So a more appropriate name would be the Dirty Mexican Flu. However that would unduly prejudice all Mexicans, just like "swine flu" unduly prejudices pigs and the pork industry.

      I got an idea, how's about we ask someone about to die from it what it should be called? Maybe they might give us some perspective about whether the name is worth arguing about.

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
  4. Choosing name on similarity by Gorm+the+DBA · · Score: 5, Funny
    Let's see....

    Characteristics of a flu...

    • Overrated in impact
    • makes you feel sick if you come in contact with it
    • Those who pay the least attention to science will be impacted by it the worst
    • makes you feel much better once you're beyond it
    • Costs the nation billions of dollars in lost productivity
    • invades countries without any concern for borders
    • the world would be a better place without it.

    given all these, the choice is obvious...

    I hereby dub this latest flu the CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN FLU

  5. Yes, it's important that deadly viruses. . . by JSBiff · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not be named after 'unclean' animals after all. I only get kosher diseases, thank you very much!

  6. Re:+1 Vote for Mexican Flu by downix · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unfortunately for us, the origin of the flu is turning out to be from the United States, not Mexico. So, the USA Flu then you are suggesting?

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
  7. Just tell Colbert your idea... by FingerDemon · · Score: 4, Informative

    His running joke is that he will sell out in nearly any way to get his name out there. He'd probably love the idea and go on his show next week and urge viewers to write to WHO to ask for the rename.

    --

    "Contrarily the lookaside buffer might not be the panacea... "
  8. The Plight of the Copts by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a real problem in Egypt, which is persecuting its Coptic Christians by slaughtering their pigs. A minority in Egypt are Christian, the word "Copt" refers to their Egyptian ethnicity.

    Some of the Copts farm pork, which the majority of Egyptian Islamic citizens (and their powerful clerics) feel are unclean. The Copts feed the pigs by recycling garbage, compounding their unclean nature in the eyes of Islamics. So, the Egyptians are slaughtering the pigs in the fear that they are influenza vectors.

    We don't actually know that the pig is a vector for the virus at all. Thus, the Egyptian slaughters are unwarranted. We do know that human-to-human contact is a problem this time. The pigs are where influenza genes are often mixed, because they are susceptible to avian, human, and swine viruses. There probably was one pig-to-human transmission at the beginning of this epidemic, but there isn't evidence of continuing transmission after that.

    The Copts are persecuted like most religious minorities in religious states. You don't see many of them in government (and none in high positions) or education. They don't often get government permission to build churches, and in 2007 there were Islamic riots because the people around the Copts thought they wanted to build a church. They need government permission to perform religious services.

    The bottom line here is that the Egyptians, by slaughtering the pigs, remove the livelyhood of the Copts. They aren't promising to restore that livelyhood.

  9. My Submission by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny
    Space herpes. Let's try it on:

    "I can't come in to work today. I have space herpes."

    "Some guy on the subway gave me space herpes."

    "CNN Reporting today that another 35 cases of space herpes have surfaced in New York."

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  10. Here's an idea by shma · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about we stop giving stupid suggestions their own Slashdot articles?

    --
    I came here for a good argument
  11. Re:Colbert != comedian by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm sorry but "Colbert" and "Comedian" only belong in the sentence if the words between them are "is not a ". Maybe I'm English and I just don't get him....

    Colbert is an example of cultural humor. The Colbert character is a parody of American right-wing demagogues.

    Unless you are familiar with those demagogues, you'll not understand the comedy.

    It's like slashdot humor. Unless you're familiar with the memes, the subject matter, and the jokes that have come before, 3/4 of the jokes just won't be funny to you.

    That's the problem with humor... little of it is universal (not even poop jokes are universal, as some cultures don't have the same hang-ups about doody that we do). Slapstick is probably the only truly universal humor.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  12. Bacon Fever!!! by CRiMSON · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm telling you Bacon Fever!!!

    --
    oogly boogly!
  13. Re:Colbert != comedian by nomadic · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's like slashdot humor. Unless you're familiar with the memes, the subject matter, and the jokes that have come before, 3/4 of the jokes just won't be funny to you.

    I am familiar with the memes, the subject matter, and the jokes that have come before, and 4/4 of them still aren't funny.

  14. Rejected names by jbeaupre · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wilbur's flu
    Flu Z
    Montezuma's revenge
    Tequila flu
    Panic flu
    Non-Kosher/Non-Halal flu
    One flu over the cuckoo's nest

    (just flat out ignore my poorly formatted list above. Sorry)

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  15. So religions have the last word on disease naming? by muuh-gnu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > ethnic reactions to 'swine,' for example among middle-eastern cultures who feel

    Actually, they do not "feel" this at all, it has been force-hammered into their heads from early childhood, when they minds could not defend themselves, because several hundreds of years ago, their self-appointed religious founders had no refrigerators (but forgot to leave a "or any later version" in their GPLs.. err... holy scriptures).

    So basically a secular, neutral, international health organisationen now forces a disease renaming onto the whole planet because a few backwards theocracies, who happen to have stuck themselves into a religion without a feasible upgrade path (hehehehehe), threaten to let their people die en masse in order to avoid pronouncing the word "swine" loudly. (I'm writing this, but still cant grasp that they rally mean this seriously. Jeez.)

  16. Re:Colbert != comedian by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sorry but "Colbert" and "Comedian" only belong in the sentence if the words between them are "is not a ". Maybe I'm English and I just don't get him....

    That's OK, mate. We don't get the whole cross-dressing thing here.

    Cheers.

  17. Flying Pig Flu by AkkarAnadyr · · Score: 4, Funny

    The virus has genetic characteristics of avian flu and swine flu.

    The obvious way to distinguish this one is to call it the Flying Pig Flu.

    Late-night comics and morning zoo types will flog it for all it's worth, so it will overtake the current moniker.

    And the zealots will have to try to kill all the flying pigs.

    Sorry, Stephen.

    --

    I bought this house and you know I'm boss
    Ain't no h'aint gonna run me off

  18. Great idea! by denzacar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Further more, I suggest we submit that for further discussion in an article of its own.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  19. I prefer... by prograde · · Score: 5, Funny

    I prefer the name Pandemic Influenza Germ...although people will undoubtedly shorten that to an acronym of some sort.

  20. Re:Colbert != comedian by afabbro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am familiar with the memes, the subject matter, and the jokes that have come before, and 4/4 of them still aren't funny.

    Well, in that case, the problem seems to be you. Have you considered that possibly you are just a humorless twit?

    More likely, the memes you cherish just aren't that funny.

    Oh look, another In Soviet Russia joke. More hot grits. Another set of Profit!!! steps. Hey, there's that same Beowulf cluster joke again.

    You're right, the problem is that the humor is all too rich for us.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers