Slashdot Mirror


Samsung Papyrus E-Book Reader, Coming Soon

kanewm writes with a snippet from Portable-Ebook-Reader.NET: "Samsung's new, highly portable e-book reader, dubbed 'Papyrus,' will be available in Korea in June 2009 and in the UK and North America sometime later (likely within several months)." As the site notes, though, this lacks some features of the Kindle, the obvious choice for comparison in the American market.

145 comments

  1. Lack of features by sanborn's+man · · Score: 5, Insightful

    well, if DRM is one of those "features" it lacks, I'll consider it. Kindle 2 is nice, but its draconian DRM it is a big no no for me.

    1. Re:Lack of features by JohnBailey · · Score: 2, Informative

      well, if DRM is one of those "features" it lacks, I'll consider it. Kindle 2 is nice, but its draconian DRM it is a big no no for me.

      Most if not all support multiple formats. Usually only one DRM encumbered format.

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    2. Re:Lack of features by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'm hoping the screen technology has improved a bit. The slow update rate is the limiting factor with all current eBook readers. If the screen was faster, reading PDFs zoomed in or flicking through books/news items/menus/web pages would be a realistic prospect.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Lack of features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The second version of the e-ink displays (which they are branding "Vizplex" are a tad faster (perhaps half the refresh time), but still not good enough to be able to flick through a book or do panning.

      I also find with PDFs that the rendering time with these relative slow ARM based machines can often be longer than the screen refresh, so it isn't purely a display issue.

    4. Re:Lack of features by yamfry · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not really sure where this Kindle-is-full-of-DRM idea comes from. The Kindle has no DRM, but it does support a file format that can be restricted with DRM. I'm a Kindle 2 user (there are a lot of things I don't like about it, but that's another topic), and I have never put a single DRM-laden format on it. There are free utilities from both Amazon and third parties (I use Stanza) that will convert a host of other formats (PDF -- poorly, .mobi, etc) to Kindle format. There is nothing intrinsic to the device itself that makes it a DRM machine.

    5. Re:Lack of features by Late+Adopter · · Score: 1

      I never understood the view that if something supports a form of DRM, it's evil. Every ebook reader supports open formats of some sort that can make every bit as much use of the device's features (EPUB in the Sony case, which is the one I'm familiar with).

      Your complaint isn't with the device, it's with the associated store. Use a different store (Baen, Fictionwise), download public domain (Feedbooks), or just pirate the damn things.

      Through a combination of those 3 options, I've been quite happy with my Sony Reader.

    6. Re:Lack of features by Amouth · · Score: 1

      i'm waiting for a device that does progressive screen updates vs's full wipe re right..

      then it will be far cleaner and faster for alot of things

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    7. Re:Lack of features by linuxhansl · · Score: 1
      I recently got a Kindle 2. The hardware is great, the free wireless is cool.

      But I will never ever purchase a $9 (or so) DRM controlled e-book. That is ridiculous. For $0.20 I might. Anything more is theft and I'd rather get the paper version.

      However, there is a lot of free stuff to be found sites gutenberg.org, scientific articles, philosphical texts, etc. Basically all the stuff that glues you the computer screen to read it. Now I just read all whenever/whereever I want on the Kindle.

      The Kindle will read .mobi files directly, and you can convert PDF and HTML to a format that works on the Kindle for free (but you need an Amazon account to do the conversion, and I do not know whether the result of the conversion is DRM crippled or not).

  2. Thank God by bensafrickingenius · · Score: 4, Funny

    Another ebook reader.

    --
    I am not left-handed, either!
    1. Re:Thank God by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm using ebook readers to roof my CSS manual house.

    2. Re:Thank God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I don't get it...

    3. Re:Thank God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do. Good one.
      Unless we have a devastating fire, hardcopy doesn't run out of batteries, lose its memory, or fail to work with new technology and I can lend them freely without any kind of installation worries. To see the problem with the tech way, just look back a bit. For example, I still want to read my 5-1/4" diskettes but that computer is not happy.
      The big problem with the dead tree version is the space it takes up.
      It will be unreliable enough without DRM so no Kindle. I haven't found one I like enough yet, though, so I am waiting a while longer, for a company and product I can trust, before I buy my reader.

    4. Re:Thank God by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Informative

      every time there's a review of a css book (such as Friday?), there's a comment to the effect: "my house made of css books is almost complete"

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  3. Usual flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $299. Way too expensive.

    1. Re:Usual flaw by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because no-one would pay $299 for an iPod when you can just get a Walkman for $10.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Usual flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strawman

  4. Kindle, Papyrus...yawn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why not a cool name like ThanaTree or Necroarbortron?

  5. Highly portable? by stasike · · Score: 1

    I wonder what makes it more highly portable than Sony Reader (PRS 500. PRS 505, PRS 700), Kindle (1 and 2), Bookeen Cybook Gen3, The Jinke/Hanlin and quite a few others.

  6. If the DRM is th eonly thing you do not like ... by stasike · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, there are quite a few readers http://wiki.mobileread.com/wiki/E-book_devices with much less draconian DRM or even completely without DRM:

    Sony Reader PRS-700, Sony Reader PRS-505, Bokeen Cybook Gen3, IRex Digital Reader, IRex iLiad, The Jinke/Hanlin, Ganaxa GeR2, Soribook, Readius, Hanvon N510 , Hanvon N516, astak EZ Reader, Astak Mentor, the new 5" models from several manufacturers and quite a few clones and rebranded OEM versions of above mentioned devices.

  7. All-important specs missing by EdZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lack of data support outside the US isn't a problem. The Kindle only supports EVDO, which nobody outside the US uses anyway. And whilst there is not hardware keyboard, I'd imagine the touchscreen supports a software keyboard (otherwise the 'memo' menu button displayed rather prominently would be pretty useless). The real make-or-break factor is it's resolution. The Kindle, along with all the other e-ink readers I've seen, have had no higher a resolution than 1280x1024 (for the iRex Digital Reader costing an exorbitant £600), with 800x600 being the norm. This is unacceptably low for comfortable reading without huge fonts (and thus low word counts per page), and entirely prevents the use of grayscale images at any readable quality. Until e-ink displays can hit 1280x1024 at a reasonable price point, they're just not worth it.

    1. Re:All-important specs missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EVDO is used here in India.

    2. Re:All-important specs missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Pity deodorant isn't.

    3. Re:All-important specs missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I would consider 200 dpi the minimum barely acceptable resolution. 300 dpi is visibly better, and 600 dpi is finally "good enough". There is a reason laser printers improved from 300 to 600 and 1200 dpi as soon as they could develop the technology. It isn't merely a question of smooth fonts - at lower than 200 dpi small print like superscripts and footnotes is simply unreadable.

      An A4 sheet at 200 dpi requires 2338 x 1653 pixels, and an A5 page (paperback size) has 1653 x 1169 pixels. In other words, the reader resolutions are still only getting there and real paper is the clear readability champion.

    4. Re:All-important specs missing by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 3, Informative

      Four words for you: Resolution, Resolution, Resolution, Resolution [you can visualize a monkey-dance here if you like]
      The lousy 800x600 greyscale that most ebook readers have makes a mockery of any attempt to render equations or scientific illustrations. For equations, you need higher resolution, unless you are happy with a single equation with a few sub/super scripts filling the screen by itself. For informative diagrams, you need color and resolution. I'll skip ebook readers for a while longer.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    5. Re:All-important specs missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the bright side, now that they've taken your job, you don't have to smell them.

    6. Re:All-important specs missing by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine the touchscreen supports a software keyboard (otherwise the 'memo' menu button displayed rather prominently would be pretty useless).

      Well, duh... You do have a pretty weak imagination, do you?
      Try imagining how you wrote with a real notepad and a pencil.
      Got it? ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    7. Re:All-important specs missing by aliquis · · Score: 1

      you wrote with a real notepad and a pencil.

      What? This is Slashdot.

      Your method is clearly inferior, it's slow and makes unreadable texts.

    8. Re:All-important specs missing by MikeFats · · Score: 1

      Until e-ink displays can hit 1280x1024 at a reasonable price point, they're just not worth it.

      A screen's resolution alone is not an indicator of reading comfort or font size. Even a high-resolution display will look coarse if its physical dimensions are large. The spec to look for is pixels-per-inch (ppi): http://wiki.mobileread.com/wiki/E-book_Reader_Matrix

    9. Re:All-important specs missing by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The real make-or-break factor is it's resolution. The Kindle, along with all the other e-ink readers I've seen, have had no higher a resolution than 1280x1024 (for the iRex Digital Reader costing an exorbitant £600), with 800x600 being the norm. This is unacceptably low for comfortable reading without huge fonts (and thus low word counts per page), and entirely prevents the use of grayscale images at any readable quality. Until e-ink displays can hit 1280x1024 at a reasonable price point, they're just not worth it.

      One thing to remember is that all existing eInk readers have screens made by the same company (which also holds the patent to the technology), and usually on the same factories. It's why the screens vary so little, and why prices are so close (most expensive thing is the screen).

      iRex readers are so pricey in large part because larger screens they have are made specifically for them, in much smaller quantities - all other readers use the very same 600x800 screen (used to be 4 shades of gray, now 16), and that's what the factories mostly produce.

      In any case, the real problem is not screen size in pixels, anyway, it's the DPI. For example, iRex has more pixels, but also larger screen, so text readability at the same font size is just as bad. Right now those things are somewhere at ~170dpi, IIRC, which is about that of a matrix printer - acceptable, but, as you note, needs larger font sizes. If (or rather when) they get to 300dpi, it should be close enough to typographic quality to be able to use serif fonts at same size as paper books.

      By the way, one thing you can do today to improve readability on existing readers is to use sans-serif fonts. Verdana and Lucida go pretty well.

    10. Re:All-important specs missing by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The screens on these things are actually very nice to look at, the same as reading off paper in fact. The resolution is more than good enough for eBooks.

      A higher resolution probably wouldn't help much. Okay, smaller pixels = more info on screen, but the screen is so small you would have a hard time actually reading it.

      The thing they really need to sort out is screen update times. ~2 seconds is fine when reading an eBook, but not much good for PDFs or web pages where you need to scroll around.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:All-important specs missing by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      e-Ink is going to have to be ~200 dpi before I can even try to give a shit. I have an IBM Thinkpad with a 133ppi display. Why isn't e-Ink at least twice as good?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. Why in the world by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... would I want to buy something the size of a netbook, for more money than a netbook, that only does 1/100th the things a netbook will do?

    Thanks, but... no thanks.

    1. Re:Why in the world by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      No wireless. Less space than a Nomad.

      Lame.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Why in the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... would I want to buy something the size of a netbook, for more money than a netbook, that only does 1/100th the things a netbook will do? Thanks, but... no thanks.

      It's the screen. The point of these readers is to use e-ink display, which doesn't have electrons flying towards your eyes.

      Also, there's something to be said about doing one thing, and doing it REALLY well.

    3. Re:Why in the world by steveg · · Score: 1

      It's considerably smaller than a netbook. My Sony is about 1/4" thick. It's 5" wide and 7" long. When you're talking about a device that size, those differences are huge. I can put my Sony in a cargo pocket in my pants, or (with a little effort) in the inside pocket of my jacket.

      I'm sorry, you're not going to find a netbook that can do that.

      One of the things that the reader can do that your netbook cannot, is easily read the screen outside, even in direct sun. Unless you have an XO netbook, just try that on your netbook.

      An e-reader with e-paper will not do what your netbook does, but the netbook will not do what the reader will, either. Whether you think it's a worthwhile expense is up to you, but their abilities don't overlap much.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
    4. Re:Why in the world by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Battery life, and the paper-like display. They also tend to be a hell of a lot thinner.

      Not enough to sell me on one (I mostly listen to audiobooks anyways), but the market definitely exists.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    5. Re:Why in the world by agrippa_cash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because it claims to do something better than a netbook can. I am slightly eccentric though: I use a watch to tell time, a cellphone to talk and a camera to take pictures. It may seem silly, but there are a lot of people like me.

      I'll hold off until they are cheaper though.

    6. Re:Why in the world by teg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ... would I want to buy something the size of a netbook, for more money than a netbook, that only does 1/100th the things a netbook will do?

      Because it's smaller (like a pocket book), has much improved battery life and has a much better display for its particular purpose. I don't like reading books on a laptop, or even worse, on an iphone even though they have a lot of features an e-book reader does nat have.

      If I could buy they Kindle here, I would. One major reason for ignoring other offerings is the book store... unlike music, "bring your own book" doesn't work very well so access to a large electronic book store is a huge plus.

    7. Re:Why in the world by caywen · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about the Papyrus or the Kindle?

    8. Re:Why in the world by ucblockhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To read in full sunlight.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    9. Re:Why in the world by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Sorry, my reply to the person above was intended for you. If those are the dimensions of your netbook, the Kindle is larger. I would like to see you put a Kindle in your pocket.

    10. Re:Why in the world by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      It's not enough of a difference to matter to me. All these things are great. But not worth my money.

      Perfect a color version of e-paper, make it bigger (I have had a Palm Pilot for years, I don't need another one), give it a touch screen and virtual keyboard. Then I might bite.

      When similar devices without the e-paper came out some years ago, they did not have sufficient processing power and lacked applications. Today that's not a problem.

    11. Re:Why in the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it only does one thing but it excels at doing it

    12. Re:Why in the world by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Eventually "better" screen and much better battery life?

    13. Re:Why in the world by xlsior · · Score: 1

      ... would I want to buy something the size of a netbook, for more money than a netbook, that only does 1/100th the things a netbook will do?

      e-ink.

      Seriously, in direct sunlight it completely blows any laptop screen out of the water. It's not even close. Plus since there is no active lighting, it is extremely easy on the eyes. Looking at computer screens for any prolonged amount of time leads to eye strain, which is not the case with e-ink displays -- it really does feel the same as reading a normal book.

      Aside from the readability, most e-Readers don't use any power unless you change the screen -- the Sony PRS-505 is rated for 7,500 *page changes* on a single battery charge (750Mah), but depending on how long you actually look at each page that can translate to weeks of runtime. Good luck trying that with a laptop or netbook.

      Besides, the e-readers are significantly smaller than Netbooks. For example:
      The ASUS eeePC 701 claims to be the smallest netbook available. It's 6.5 x 8.9 x 1.4 inches. The Sony PRS-505 e-Reader is 6.9 x 4.8 x 0.3 inches.
      That's almost half the surface area, and less than a quarter of the thickness.

      I bit the bullet some time last years and bought one myself. Best purchase I ever made...

      Anyway: In my mind you really shouldn't be comparing the eReaders with a laptop replacement, but with a book replacement. Current laptops simply aren't a viable substitute: The big power requirements, and massive eyestrain induced by the current generation of displays don't even put it in the same ballpark. I wouldn't even consider reading an entire book on my laptop, but have no problem at all doing it on an eReader: it's smaller, extremely portable (easily fits in a pocket), can run a VERY long time on a single charge, and is very easy on the eyes.
      At the same time, it beats old-fashioned paper books: You can carry hundreds of books on a single SD card, which makes it great when traveling on airplanes. It remembers exactly where you last left off in any number of books. You can adjust the fontsize up or down so you're not stuck with whatever size the publisher deemed best. To me, it's the best of both worlds.

      That said: Should the industry ever manage to speed up e-ink display technology significantly from the current ~half-second refresh rate to >10FPS or more, I'd wager that it would make an absolutely killer laptop screen for people that need to work outside... Visually there really is no comparison between e-ink and LCD/TFT... I'd gladly settle for black-and-white as long as the readability and refreshrate is there...

    14. Re:Why in the world by Farmer+Pete · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't say that if you had looked at an e-ink screen. It's nothing like an LCD. It uses no power to display, only to "change the page". This means that you can go through 2000 pages on a single charge. Try that on a netbook! The nice thing is this, if you use DRM free books, you can still keep a copy on your netbook, your laptop, your desktop, your online storage location, etc. You are free to do what ever you want! But I promise you, if you had used an e-ink device, you would choose to use an e-ink device to view your electronic books. :-)

    15. Re:Why in the world by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      I guess I've never understood that argument. Camera phones aren't about replacing your camera, they're about having a camera with you 99% of the time. I don't know how many times something has happened that I wanted a picture of and didn't have a real camera handy. The camera phone pictures aren't the best, but they often do the job of capturing the moment well enough for me.

      Obviously, if I'm going somewhere or doing something that I expect to be interesting I bring my real camera along for the ride. The camera on my phone and my real camera fulfill two very different purposes and I'm happy to have them both.

    16. Re:Why in the world by mgblst · · Score: 1

      It serves a different purpose, for example it is a lot easier to read these for long periods of time.

      You might as well complain that you can get a screwdriver for $4 down at walmart.

    17. Re:Why in the world by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      I couldn't do it on a single charge, but I could easily read e-books on my Palm Pilot, and for that matter still can. I am aware that the screen might be of better quality, but it's still a one-trick pony.

    18. Re:Why in the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who needs wireless? Or a keyboard, for that matter. I want to read a book, not write one. Also, 512 seems sufficient to carry several books.

        So unless you're needing to carry your entire library to prepare for the apporkolyspe and want to be able to maintain a journal of your adventures for future archeologists from space, it isn't strictly necessary.

    19. Re:Why in the world by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've tried reading eBooks on a Palm and there's really no comparison with an eInk screen. The eInk display is 166dpi and entirely reflective (no backlight), with contrast similar to newsprint. It's something you can read for hours without developing eye strain, and can read easily sitting in direct sunlight. It may be a one-trick pony, but it's a very valuable one trick. The iPod is a one-trick pony too (why not just use a laptop or mobile phone for playing music too?) but a lot of people are willing to pay for that one trick.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    20. Re:Why in the world by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

      A paper book is also a one trick pony, and they've been pretty successful.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    21. Re:Why in the world by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      166 dpi is pathetic, I have an IBM ThinkPad A21p with 15" 1600x1200, that's 133 ppi on a fucking LCD. e-Ink should be at least 300 dpi. 166 is still muy grainy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:Why in the world by DadLeopard · · Score: 1

      When you are trapped on a 12 hour flight with no power outlet to recharge your netbook, it isn't going to be much use after the first couple of hours! The Sony Reader can be used for about a week between recharges! I speak from experience, just having returned from Eastern Europe and spent 18 hours in transit! It probably saved almost the cost of the device in extra luggage and overweight fees!! I tend to read a lot!!!

    23. Re:Why in the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your Mom is a one-trick pony.

    24. Re:Why in the world by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      That's not a very valid comparison... even today most paper books are well under $20.00.

    25. Re:Why in the world by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      These points have already been made, and don't sway me. I can read e-books on my Palm just fine, even if a larger e-ink screen is better. It's not worth the price to me.

    26. Re:Why in the world by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

      If I had a paper book that could change its pages to whatever book I wished to read at the moment, I would gladly pay $350 for it.

      The "trick" to which you refer is the replication of the book reading experience, which the Kindle and similar do very, very well. The fact that other devices are able to present text that you can read does not even begin to touch the value of a dedicated e-reader, in my opinion.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    27. Re:Why in the world by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

      I have both a netbook and a Kindle, purchased about 30 days apart. They are completely different machines. A netbook does NOT do what a Kindle does.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    28. Re:Why in the world by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      One more time: this argument has already been raised, and I simply disagree. While the display might not be as nice, nor the battery life, I can get a Netbook that is not much bigger, makes a fine e-book reader, and does hundreds of other things as well. From MY viewpoint, e-book readers are an overly-expensive luxury item.

    29. Re:Why in the world by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

      I guess the crux of our disagreement is whether a netbook makes a "fine e-book reader." As I said, I have both, and I can't imagine reading a book on my netbook. It simply is not suitable for that purpose, in my opinion. I'm not just talking about whether I can read from the screen or not. I'm talking about reading for hours on end, in many different locations and in many different positions and postures, and all types of lighting, with no power cords or downtime during the entire process. In other words...just like a book. But a book that becomes whatever I want to read at the moment.

      I do agree, however, that at the current price point, the Kindle and other readers are luxury items. But the issue of price does not mean that another similar item is "just as good."

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    30. Re:Why in the world by BlueHands · · Score: 1

      So, I don't hit /. as much as i used to,for lots of reasons. But when I do I LOVE seeing the content, like your comment, that is a call back to a kinder,gentler /.

      A time when we had overloads, Soviet Russia and ?????

      --
      I mod everyone down who says "I'll get modded down for this." I hate to disappoint.
    31. Re:Why in the world by BlueHands · · Score: 1

      Sunlight???

      Sounds dangerous.

      --
      I mod everyone down who says "I'll get modded down for this." I hate to disappoint.
    32. Re:Why in the world by steveg · · Score: 1

      Those are not the dimensions of my netbook. Those are the dimensions of my Sony Reader. Perhaps smaller than a Kindle but *way* smaller than any netbook I've seen. The dimensions of the Kindle look like it's half an inch longer and double the thickness of my Sony. I haven't tried a Kindle, but I'd bet I could get it in the same pockets my Sony fits in.

      By comparison, my netbook is four times the thickness of my Sony Reader, three inches wider, and three inches longer. That's a huge difference.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
  9. It's PAPYRUS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't they releasing this a few millennia too late?

  10. Still a niche product by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Given the high price point and the (likely) too-restrictive DRM, I just can't see any of these devices really take off. I'm sure that, just like with music, the problem isn't the device manufacturers - it's the book publishers that are the problem. But as things stand now, there are just too many trade-offs for these to move into the mainstream. The publishers are just too concerned with trying to stuff the genii back into the bottle. Eventually someone - maybe Apple? - will come along with enough conviction (so they won't compromise) and clout (so they don't HAVE to compromise), and we'll finally get a truly revolutionary e-reader.

    For the present, though it's too bad - I'd love to get e-book readers for all three of us (my wife, daughter, and myself). I'd love to quit buying paper books and a printed newspaper. For now, however, they're just too expensive and too locked down.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Still a niche product by MattXBlack · · Score: 1

      BeBook isn't tied to DRM. I have heard rumours you can get hold of ebooks at the same place you can get music, films and tv shows.

    2. Re:Still a niche product by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 1

      It's not going to be conviction that gets a company to be able to do it DRM-free, its going to be the publishers trying to break a single dominant outlet (e.g. iTunes for music). The single dominant outlet is probably an obvious result of a heavily DRM'd market, corresponding with the most convenient solution.

      If no one were to use any form of DRM'd e-books, you'd probably have the publishers say 'look, no one wants them.' Fortunately, I think there's enough interest in the product that the publishers will be forced to come around. Its just a matter of time.

      Of course, cost is always a matter of time as well.

    3. Re:Still a niche product by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of eBook readers that support open formats like .lit, .pdb or .txt. The problem is that the DRM ties you to one bookstore.

      It's the same situation as MP3 players. How many people have 120GB of music they bought to fill the thing up? Not many I bet, although at least Amazon offer DRM-free MP3s now. Eventually eBooks will go the same way, in the face of better quality (i.e. non DRM restricted) products from BitTorrent sites.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Still a niche product by __aarzwb9394 · · Score: 1
      The reason I think ebook readers will remain niche products (certainly when compared to mp3 players) is that there is no way (that isn't spectacularly labour intensive and quite pricey)of putting books you already own onto them.

      There is no way I would own an mp3 player without being able to do that with music. I can only see this being, at best, as popular as a portable video player.

      If I could put all the books I own now onto a kindle/ebook/papyrus, I'd already have bought one.

      I do hope we aren't all sleepwalking into being resold the same content again

  11. Only one feature needed by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (Insert Sarah Palin joke here.)

    Because it has one feature that your netbook doesn't: the eInk display. This display only consumes power when the contents of the display change. The Sony ebook claims 7 thousand/i. page turns before the battery runs down. That would be very handy for long plane rides or road trips. The best netbooks run out of power in 10 hours, regardless of how quickly you read. (Which might be OK if you have access to a power outlet.) Dead tree books don't use any power at all — but that much printed matter is a pain to carry around when you're on the road.

    Now, I don't have an ebook reader because $400 is to much to spend on something I'd rarely use. Part of that is because I own a tablet which is great for reading in an armchair or in bed. (And which I paid way too much for.) I'd still be tempted if I did any travelling, especially to place where I wouldn't want to risk my tablet.

    1. Re:Only one feature needed by Whillowhim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly, but you did miss one other feature. Size matters. Try putting your netbook in your pocket, or holding it in your hand without resting it on something. Readers are small enough and light enough that they are in a completely different class of portable compared to a small notebook computer. Its a similar comparison between an ipod and a netbook, since both of them play audio just fine.

      So... if you want something with crazy battery life (1 week or more), small enough to fit in a pocket and light enough to hold in your hands indefinitely you want an e-book reader. If you don't mind recharging 1-2 times a day, carting a small bag around to hold your notebook and setting your notebook down on a convenient surface to read books, then don't bother with an e-book reader.

    2. Re:Only one feature needed by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Really? I want to see you put a Kindle in your pocket.

    3. Re:Only one feature needed by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Funny

      He has very biig pockets. (Will be the new US size 0 in 2010.)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:Only one feature needed by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 1

      They actually fit quite nicely into cargo pants. Useful for taking it on the subway or things like that.

    5. Re:Only one feature needed by fm6 · · Score: 1

      If you don't mind recharging 1-2 times a day, carting a small bag around to hold your notebook and setting your notebook down on a convenient surface to read books, then don't bother with an e-book reader.

      As a matter of fact, I hate reading on a notebook. You can't curl up with the thing. If I didn't already have a tablet, the Kindle would be a lot more tempting.

    6. Re:Only one feature needed by stasike · · Score: 1

      I carry my Sony reader in my breast pocket in my jacket.

    7. Re:Only one feature needed by Whillowhim · · Score: 1

      Not sure about the exact size of the Kindle, but I carry my Sony Reader around in my pocket a lot. My pants tend to have pockets on the large size, and it can be a tight fit, but I do use them. Alternately, both my lightweight and heavier jackets have interior pockets that will work, though the heavy one is a tight fit.

    8. Re:Only one feature needed by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

      I'm 5'10 and 175 pounds. I can easily slip my Kindle in my standard work pants (I wear a coat and tie to work) when I go to the bathroom, so nobody knows I'm catching a read in there.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
  12. E-Book? I'd rather have a document reader. by smith6174 · · Score: 0

    Seriously, E-book is about the stupidest invention I can think of. How about a device that I can use to read the thousands of .pdf files I have. There is no use waiting for all of the academic papers in the world to be re-done in some e-book format. How about all the pdf versions of books available through torrent that I shouldn't have to fire up my laptop to read? I know there are technical problems involved with pdf, but it can't be that hard. I would guess that the first effective .pdf document display device would catch on like a new ipod. DRM? Fuck 'em, everybody can afford a scanner.

  13. auto-fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no wireless support?
    nothing more than a very expansive piece of junk

  14. Re:E-Book? I'd rather have a document reader. by AeneaTech · · Score: 1

    Such a device does exist, it's called an ebook reader :D

  15. Gotta be a winner by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Costs just a little less than a kindle 2, less memory, no keyboard, smaller screen, fewer features. No idea how many book titles will be available for it.

    It does have a calculator though.

    Makes me want to run out and get one to replace my kindle 2.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    1. Re:Gotta be a winner by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Costs just a little less than a kindle 2, less memory, no keyboard, smaller screen, fewer features. No idea how many book titles will be available for it.

      Why on earth would you want to have a keyboard on an ebook reader?

      I don't see (nor want to see) ebook readers evolve into my "I have everything I need on the go"-device. Cellphones are doing a pretty good job filling that role; ebook readers are an extra device to take along to read books (and have lots of books stored to choose from). The most important thing I look for in a reader is: as large a screen as possible, in a package a small as possible, approaching the size of a regular paperback. That precludes physical keyboards, unless it is really thin and folds/slides away. I want something with a comfortable screen size that is still easy to carry with me in my coat pocket, without requiring a pouch or bag.

      The Iliad reader comes close... it's just a tad too bulky still, and it's way too expensive. But if I could have my choice of what is currently available, that would be it.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Gotta be a winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why on earth would you want to have a keyboard on an ebook reader?

      Well, speaking for myself I travel and I'd like to not carry lots of travel books with me but I'd also like to search for things (towns, other places). A touchscreen keyboard would be fine though.

    3. Re:Gotta be a winner by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would you want to have a keyboard on an ebook reader?

      On the Kindle, the keyboard is used for making notes in your books, entering search terms, and browsing the wireless book store.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
  16. bah, A5... by hitmark · · Score: 3, Funny

    sorry, but im not interested unless its A4...

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    1. Re:bah, A5... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I concur, but people like us represent too small a segment of the population to make such a product commercially viable at this time. I heard this directly from somebody who works for a company that makes a portable electronic document reader, and that's the response I got when I suggested that they make a letter-sized device. I was told they'd keep the idea in mind for future products, in what reminded me of the way that one gets told by a company that isn't going to hire them that "they'll keep their resume on file for 6 months" but never actually hear from ever again until you send them your resume again 6 months later.

  17. Re:E-Book? I'd rather have a document reader. by smith6174 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thanks for the clarification, you must be a genius. Why is .pdf support "experimental" and shitty even on Kindle2? Why do you need wireless to send a file to Amazon to convert a file and send it to your device? Lets get real. If a decent reader device existed, every grad student in the country would want one.

  18. My Feature Criteria by NoobixCube · · Score: 1

    I won't buy an ebook reader until they have most of the things I want. Wifi access to shares on the local network - I often read on the couch; a comic reader program, because I do like my Deadpool; a colour screen, obviously, because reading coloured comics in black and white is not cool; SD or MicroSD storage would be nice too. A couple of nice but non-compulsory features for me would be a themeable and customizable UI, and a touch screen that I can write on.

    For all that, the price would have to be at or below $250 AU - Rough completely uneducated guess (I'm not even sure what the exchange rate is right now), that's about $320 US at the moment.

    --
    Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    1. Re:My Feature Criteria by NoobixCube · · Score: 1

      I'm an idiot - I did that currency conversion backwards. I'm sure you're smart enough to see that, though...

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
  19. Re:If the DRM is th eonly thing you do not like .. by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Um exactly. I see WAAAAY ore Sony 505's in people's hands than the Kindle. Target had a sale on them a few weeks back and they were $249.95.

    I have seen 1 kindle in the wild, and at least 30 Sony readers. What I like is that I can carry years worth of my favorite magazines and every technical manual with me. My buddy bough a Sony reader for his garage after I showed him where to get all his motorcycle assembly and repair manuals in pdf form online. He said that the silicone covers for the unit keep grease and oil off them very well.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  20. what the hell is this web site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it seems to have nothing on it but this crappy one paragraph "article"?

  21. Re:E-Book? I'd rather have a document reader. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PDF support on the Sony PRS-505 is good enough for scientific papers. I use it all of the time for the files that OUP and PLoS churn out. Although using Calibre to automatically convert the HTML version is often a win, when the HTML is available.

  22. Re:E-Book? I'd rather have a document reader. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its called a Sony eReader (the PRS 505 is the nicest IMO).

    Read PDF files natively - no conversion required. Battery life is 7500 page turns (4 weeks for me), and it supports SD and Sony Stick Pro cards.

    My one reader has about 3,000 docs - including several academic papers on it. The samsung release isn't anything dramatic - just samsungs competitive offering.

  23. Price by fractalVisionz · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately this new device lacks wireless capabilities

    Does this mean it lacks wifi too?

    At this price, $299 US, it will only be $60 less than the Kindle2, without wireless capabilities. That seems like a pretty bad deal in my opinion. Sorry, not a kindle killer in my opinion.

  24. DR1000S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love my new iRex DR1000S. Great for reading technical manuals and books. Great for PDF books which you can *ahem* get off the web. Still a few software bugs, but that is improving. And yes it runs Linux and is mostly open source.

  25. Re:If the DRM is th eonly thing you do not like .. by winphreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My uncle uses a Sony reader for the same thing, except he runs a small car repair shop, and uses it for all the repair manuals he's bought over the 2 decades he had been doing it.

    --
    "I'm a well-wisher, in that I don't wish you any specific harm."
  26. Re:If the DRM is th eonly thing you do not like .. by Whillowhim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Many of those have DRM that is just as bad. I know the Sony readers have it from personal experience, and the Sony store sucks a heck of a lot more than Amazon. Of course, they all read a variety of free formats without DRM as well, as do all the readers I know about. The problem is not that the readers handle DRM, its that online stores are selling books in a variety of incompatible and restrictive formats. The Sony store sells books that are DRMed with a format only readable on the Sony e-book readers. The Amazon store only sells books readable on the Kindle. As an owner of the Sony e-book reader, I cannot buy e-books from Amazon. With a Kindle, I could not buy books from Sony. This fractures the market and turns e-books from "any book ever written (within reason)" to "any book your manufacturer bothered signing a contract with". This fractures the market and destroys much of the usefulness of an e-book reader. The sole reason I recommend the Kindle to people is because the Amazon store seems to have the best selection, I dislike some of the features of the actual reader itself (i.e. I don't see downloading books over a cell phone as a feature, since you have to pay for it with higher priced books and a short battery life if you forget to turn wireless off).

    Of course, there are stores out there that sell books in a non-DRM format. Baen was one of the first publisher to do this and I have bought a lot of books from them. However, they are a small fraction of the books published today (3ish new books a month, all sci-fi or fantasy) and the same seems to hold true for the other stores I've found. Fictionwise seems to come up in conversation a lot, but only some of its books are DRM-free, and the 6 times so far I've gone looking for a specific book from them, they've had it only in DRM encumbered format. And since Sony doesn't want to release its DRM scheme, none of their DRM formats will work with my reader. I just added up my order history for Baen, and I've spent $936 on their e-books over the past 3 years. I'm more than willing to pay for books, but there are a lot of e-books out there where people simply refuse to take my money.

    The alternative to all of this, of course, is to pirate books. This is generally a pain in the ass and can result in some poor quality books, but there is a lot more available this way than there is from legitimate non-DRMed books. I haven't found a specific site that works well for downloading books. Many of the major torrent sites have large collections of books available for download, but they can be pretty spotty and the quality is... variable. There will often be issues with the lines being too long for the reader, and wrapping in weird ways or with extra spaces between lines. There are some that are perfectly fine, but it is often a crap shoot. On the other hand, the first time I got frustrated with Fictonwise's DRM only books, I found a collection of sci-fi and fantasy that was 9 gigs. A good portion of that was scans of graphic novels, but you can fit a mind-blowing amount of text into even a small part of a 9 gig compressed file. Once I downloaded that, my first stop for new books is Baen, and the second stop is my hard drive. Its rare that I bother looking for anything else now. I still check for some new releases on various websites, but more often than not I'm disappointed in the results. I'm not going to pay $18 for a book that has been out in paperback for 6 months. And that was just the one book lately that _was_ available.

    Though I may have got off track a bit, I think the real problem here is not that readers can handle DRM, its that online stores are fucked up. I could easily have spent an extra $1k on books if they were available in a format that works in my e-book reader. The fact that publishers won't allow those formats is the problem, not the fact that a specific reader has DRM for file format Y, but not Z. They're just asking everyone who doesn't have their specific e-book reader to pirate the books, instead of selling good quality versions for sale with reasonable fees and an easy to use system to download what you want when you want it.

  27. Who needs wireless? by Dillenger69 · · Score: 1

    Honestly, who needs wireless on an eBook reader?
    As long as it's got a memory card slot and/or a USB port that's really all it needs. A keyboard is also another thing that's pretty much useless on a book reader. With a touch screen, the thing should pretty much just have a power button and no more.

    If the screen is ok, the DRM isn't there, and I can get one for way less than $299, I'm there. Once something like this can go for $100, or even $150, I'm all over it.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:Who needs wireless? by iknowcss · · Score: 1
      --
      Life is rarely fair. Cherish the moments when there is a right answer.
  28. Re:E-Book? I'd rather have a document reader. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have a look at the iRex Digital Reader. A4 size, supports PDF.

  29. not impressed from the few details by digitalderbs · · Score: 1

    I'm a kindle 2 owner. I looked at the touch-screen on a Sony device, and I didn't like it. The screen had more glare, and I didn't find it to be a suitable replacement for the keyboard. I suspect this device will have the same shortcomings.

    The "article," scant on details, suggests that this device is more "portable." Since it lacks wireless, which makes it infinitely less portable than the kindle, I can only assume that it weighs less. At 10 ounces or so, weight isn't much of an issue, in my mind. That said, I think competition is good. But it would have to include many new, important features to offset the lack of wireless and keyboard. Calendar, notes and contact features are nice, but after having used an e-reader for two months, the slow refresh rate on these would make them a poor replacement for a PDA. I think Samsung has to do better than this to enter the market.

  30. Re:E-Book? I'd rather have a document reader. by sopssa · · Score: 1

    The most known one isn't always the best one. Others http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ebook_reader (and just FYI, they support pdf etc nicely)

  31. Yes! pdf, and may be djvu. by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    I am studying math, and a while ago realized I have *lots* of free textbooks, lectures, tutorials, all in pdf format and I would *love* to carry them with me. In addition, I got quite a few documents in djvu format, which is more compact that pdf. A perfect situation for ebook reader except none of them apparently deals with either format natively. So I have to convert every pdf file I have to whatever format those ebook readers are used, and for djvu, I have to convert djvu to pdf and then to the native format. Seems like getting inexpensive tablet PC might be a better idea.

  32. Great, but what about the SOFTWARE? by IronChef · · Score: 1

    We've seen some keen devices, like the Kindle, hampered by their crappy software.

    Likewise, the Sony Reader... I have one, and for the $50 it cost me as part of a credit card signup gimmick, I love it. But before I can spend a few hundred bucks on another similar item, it has GOT to be easier to use. Sony's desktop software is poor, and converting other formats for the device is a pain in the rear.

    Please, Samsung... Let this thing mount like a USB storage device. Teach it to understand txt, rtf, html, pdb, pdf, and maybe even chm--WITHOUT needing to do any conversion on my computer. And add in whatever DRM-infested format you want on top of it, fine... but please, make a product that's for readers and not PUBLISHERS.

    (I have ancient Pocket PC ebook reading software that transparently handles displaying text in all of these formats, even inside zip files. It ain't rocket surgery.

    Right now the closest thing to an uber-reader, for my needs, is this thing. Spiffy, but if someone beats them on price, I'd be there.

    http://www.bookeen.com/specs/ebook-software.aspx)

    1. Re:Great, but what about the SOFTWARE? by ErkDemon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yep, format conversion is a joy-killer.

      A serious reader =has= to be able to read PDFs and basic webpages by default. Hell, reading ODF and MSWord6 wouldn't hurt, either.

      But if a reader can't read a simple saved HTML page without an attached PC to run the conversion software, or without going online to access a proprietary conversion service, then it's not a very good document reader. If I'm going to spend a lot of money on a document reader, I want it to be able to show me PDF-archived correspondence and stored webpages.

  33. Re:If the DRM is th eonly thing you do not like .. by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

    This is exactly right. I've owned an eReader for about a year but have never bought a book from their store, nor am I likely to. I've found plenty to read on it, though, and Calibre will happily convert lots of different formats to the native one so that things look nice on the reader.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  34. Re:E-Book? I'd rather have a document reader. by Shados · · Score: 1

    You actually don't need wifi to convert the file. You can convert it via a free email service and then transfer it from your computer, no wifi needed. You got me on the experimental part (it works fine, like the browser: its experimental in the same way half of Google's stuff is beta...they don't want to take responsability for it, and if it eats away in their sales they may take it away...which I realize is pretty bad), but most other ebook readers have PDF native.

    Most grad student in the country didn't hold one in their hands, thats why they don't want one, IMO. I bought a kindle to my girlfriend who's currently in the US (i'm canadian, so I can't easily get one for myself), because she wanted one, but once I saw it and tried it out....wow, just wow.

  35. Only Pirates by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Are against DRM.

    Are you sure you don't want to rephrase your statement, comrade?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Only Pirates by lilomar · · Score: 1

      Aaah!
      A Soviet ninja!

      --
      The creator of this post (Jacob Smith) hereby releases it, and all of his other posts, into the public domain.
  36. Re:E-Book? I'd rather have a document reader. by AeneaTech · · Score: 1

    Nah, you must be just ignorant. The Kindle is not the only e-ink device out there: http://www.irextechnologies.com/node/186

    Even their old model the iLiad, which I have, supports pdf files, but you must have missed that one.

  37. Get a Netbook and run Linux on it by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    So get an Eee PC on Ebay. I've been using my 701 for more than a year and it just keeps getting better, since it is now running Mandriva 2009.1 Spring. Here is an install guide: http://aeronetworks.ca/eeepc-mdv-howto.html

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Get a Netbook and run Linux on it by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Paper is easier on the eyes than _any_ currently existing computer monitor. Epaper displays reflect light rather than emit it, so they are as comfortable to read for extended periods as normal paper is. Sure, you can't read them in the dark, but that's not the point of an epaper display... it's to be easy to read, not to shove more photons into your eyes than your pupils are generally dilated to actually accommodate.

  38. BeBook/Jinke V3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I own five BeBooks and I love them. They read HTML, PDF, DOC, RTF, TXT, MOBI, EPUB, FB2, LIT, all without conversion. The device runs on GNU/Linux and you can even replace the factory firmware with OpenInkpot, an ebook ereader OS built by hobbyist free software programmers. BeBook is actually an OEM version of Jinke eReader V3, that is being sold in the US as EZ Reder (you can find more OEMs at the mobileread wiki).

  39. Re:E-Book? I'd rather have a document reader. by mark-t · · Score: 1

    A4 has a diagonal of about 363 mm, the largest reader currently made by irex has a viewable diagonal less than 260 mm. That's a difference of about 40%. They can probably get away with calling the unit A4-sized because the entire device, including the margins with all the controls and buttons, is about that big. But the viewable area still falls quite a bit short.

  40. LaTeX by Weezul · · Score: 1

    I want an ebook reader that reads pdf files generated by tex & latex. Does one exist?

    I have little use for devices with horribly limited pdf conversion options, like the Kindle. I don't mind producing ebook sized pdfs for my own papers using pdflatex, but I'd like to be able to read other pdf files too.

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    1. Re:LaTeX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this may worth trying:

      http://www.foxitsoftware.com/ebook/

    2. Re:LaTeX by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 1

      I've been hunting for a latex-to-mobi (or other e-book formats) util out there, but haven't found anything. I have tons of code that I would love to make ebooks for Stanza and my Touch.

    3. Re:LaTeX by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the iRex iLiad can happily read PDFs. Get the community version of iPDF, rather than the bundled one, and you get much better zooming support and better power saving.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  41. There's no avoiding DRM on any reader... by Jonathan · · Score: 1

    For commercial content that is. There's no DRM even on the Kindle for your own content, but you are deluding yourself if you think major publishers are going to allow DRM-free e-books. If you don't want DRM, you are going to be limited to Project Gutenberg and the works of Cory Doctorow, basically.
     

    1. Re:There's no avoiding DRM on any reader... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Will they support all DRM formats and let you download the same book in another DRM format later if you change reader?

      If not most people would probably prefer to wait until the DRM is cracked and then copy the books instead of ending up with useless files.

      Personally I think the devices are too expensive but when I saw the cost of the parts of the Kindle I could understand why it cost the amount it does. So I guess no e-reader for me for a while ..

    2. Re:There's no avoiding DRM on any reader... by russotto · · Score: 1

      For commercial content that is. There's no DRM even on the Kindle for your own content, but you are deluding yourself if you think major publishers are going to allow DRM-free e-books. If you don't want DRM, you are going to be limited to Project Gutenberg and the works of Cory Doctorow, basically.

      And Baen's entire output, and some of the works on Fictionwise.

      Anyway, as I understand it, even for non-DRMed works, you have to go through Amazon's servers to load stuff onto your Kindle. That's a show-stopper for me. I want to be able to load my books directly from my PC, and not go through some third party on the net (who may in the future go away, add restrictions, or send my reading list to the Department of Homeland Security).

      My current eBook is an REB-1100. I'd like something with better resolution and at least grayscale, but not if I can't load books from my computer.

  42. When ebooks will take out... by Fished · · Score: 2, Interesting

    eBook readers will take off the same time that mp3 players and smart phones did... when apple releases the 'iRead' (or whatever they call it.) I'm convinced that apples the only company out there with enough sense (and cojones) to make an eBook reader that will actually be a useful substitute for the printed word. If Apple doesn't do it, then that's just an indication that the technology isn't Quite There Yet.

    Sorry, I hate to sound like a hopeless fan-boi, but after getting burned on mp3 players (that just weren't Good Enough), then on Blackberrys (that Just Weren't Quite Good Enough), and loving life with my iPod and iPhone, I'm sold.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    1. Re:When ebooks will take out... by TrekkieGod · · Score: 1

      eBook readers will take off the same time that mp3 players and smart phones did... when apple releases the 'iRead' (or whatever they call it.)

      Wait...you think mp3 players and smart phones only took off after Apple released their products? They might have immediately taken control of said market, but the market was already flourishing long before apple made their play in each one of those areas.

      'm convinced that apples the only company out there with enough sense (and cojones) to make an eBook reader that will actually be a useful substitute for the printed word.

      It's already here. The iRex Iliad is fantastic. It's also $600, which is what is holding up adoption, and why the Kindle, despite being an inferior product, is doing so well, compared to all the others (much lower price point). Apple isn't exactly known for making things cheaper so they're not going to help here. I predict they'll get into the market when every other reader costs $100, and sell theirs for $300, which will undoubtedly still take over the market, despite lacking several features that the $100 readers have. I say this for the same reason that I own an iPhone, despite it lacking features my phone of 5 years ago had. The one thing it does well, it does really well, and that's the browser.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    2. Re:When ebooks will take out... by big_paul76 · · Score: 1

      Didn't apple think about that, and reject it because most people don't read?

      --
      The plural form of "anecdote" is "anecdotes", not "evidence".
  43. Getting there... by hack++slash · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm waiting for the one which has DON'T PANIC in big friendly letters on the front.

    --
    To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
    1. Re:Getting there... by jeti · · Score: 1

      It's already available: http://xkcd.com/548/

  44. Apple, eBooks, EPUB by ErkDemon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If Apple doesn't do it, then that's just an indication that the technology isn't Quite There Yet.

    The problem with the idea of Apple walking in and taking the market is vertical integration and formats. Apple tend to like having their own proprietary formats, and hardware, and their own stores for content. So do Sony. So do Amazon.

    Sony keep trying and failing (Betamax, Minidisc). Amazon tried to corner the "print on demand" market and failed, because the industry were so furious about Amazon's abuse of power with the Booksurge fiasco that basically if Amazon hadn't backed down they have been sued or shot. Google books illegally scanned god knows how many copyright books with the intent to serve up content and charge advertising, and got sued.

    So the book industry - authors and publishers - tend to see the outside corporate guys who keep trying to take over their market and steal their content as basically pirates who are one step away from being Organised Crime (if that).

    So, while Amazon would certainly //like// to own the future eBook market and dictate terms to everyone else for the privilege of access to their ebook gateway, the book industry wants the Amazon/Kindle platform to go open-format and multi-vendor, or to fail. Same with the Sony format (except Sony seem to realise that they're weak, and seem to be making friendly noises about supporting whatever the industry decides on).

    EPUB

    I spent a few days at the London Book Fair recently, and what the publishers all seem to be pushing for is an "open" format based on XML called EPUB. They recognise that ebooks are going to become an increasingly important part of their business, and they're damned if they're going to just sign over half their future ebook income for the rest of their lives to someone like Amazon (or Sony), and be locked into a proprietary system that another company owns and controls. So they're trying to rejig their production processes around XML, with export to EPUB.

    The current plan is that EPUB becomes the default format that every publishing house uses for all their new books, in parallel with their print production, and that Amazon and Sony and everyone else have to retrofit support for EPUB or leave the market. So if the industry has its way, Kindle's proprietary format should be dead except as a legacy format in a year or two, and Kindles will be reading EPUB files Real Soon Now.

    PDF isn't half bad, but the publishing industry is (understandably) SO paranoid about being screwed by corporations trying to take over their market, that they won't even touch that, because that one's owned by Adobe. They've worked out that the only way to avoid getting screwed over is to adopt a single industry-wide format that nobody owns, and break the various corporations' attempts to use engineered incompatibility to divide and conquer the market.

    So that's where we are now.

    In that context, if Apple announced tomorrow that they were bringing out a new ebook reader that only used a proprietary Apple format, the publishing industry would look at them like they'd walked into a wedding reception, dropped their pants, and shat on the wedding cake. They saw what Apple did with iTunes, and they're damned, damned, damned if Apple are going to try to waltz in and own the new market for their content, too.

    If Apple want to do an EPUB-compatible reader, then that's fine, but if they want to set up their own new incompatible corner, that's not. And if their reader is going to be playing generic content, and if their shop isn't going to have an obvious advantage over all the other EPUB outlets, then there's not as much of a chance for Apple to extract added value from the scheme, and there's not as much reason for them to get involved with a new product.
    And, actually, Apple already HAVE a pocket-sized eBook platform, in the shape of the iPhone. Unless they can buy in ePaper technology in b

  45. Re:If the DRM is th eonly thing you do not like .. by Farmer+Pete · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I bought a Sony E-Reader last November. I travel a lot for work, and I thought it would be nice to take books with me on the plane. I like reading computer books, and most of them are about the size of the Chicago phone book. Carrying a 5-10lb book around in my backpack "in case" I feel like reading is not something I wanted to do. It is amazing how many computer manuals come with PDF copies of the books on CD. If I have to choose between two books, I will always go for the one with the PDF copy, even if I feel the one without it is a little better. A mediocre book I will use is much greater than a good book I won't.

    As far as purchasing electronic books, I've never done it yet. I don't plan on it. I'd be telling a lie if I said I had never pirated an eBook, but in my defense 95% of them have been books that I already own. I am more likely to buy the book and then pirate the electronic format than to buy the electronic format. Call me old fashioned, but I like having the book around, even if I never need to open it. I wont buy an ebook unless the price comes down significantly from the paper version AND the DRM is removed or significantly transparent and portable.

    I am a huge Discworld fan. I got hooked in the 90's after I played the Discworld PC game. I went through his books like crazy, and I now own every Discworld book. I purchased many of them from the UK when Pratchett was having difficulties with US publishers. While I support Terry Pratchett, I don't intend on repurchasing his books. I hope he can understand and forgive me for seeking alternate means of acquiring his materials. If I said I felt guilty, I would be telling a lie.

  46. yawn... by asm2750 · · Score: 1

    ...wake me up when someone comes out with a color ink ereader that can also zoom and pan pdf files, I don't really care about wireless features right now.

  47. Papyrus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope that's not a reference to the typeface it uses.

  48. Re:E-Book? I'd rather have a document reader. by DrXym · · Score: 1
    Seriously, E-book is about the stupidest invention I can think of. How about a device that I can use to read the thousands of .pdf files I have. There is no use waiting for all of the academic papers in the world to be re-done in some e-book format. How about all the pdf versions of books available through torrent that I shouldn't have to fire up my laptop to read? I know there are technical problems involved with pdf, but it can't be that hard. I would guess that the first effective .pdf document display device would catch on like a new ipod. DRM? Fuck 'em, everybody can afford a scanner.

    Some ebook devices do read PDF. But you're right, the e-book scene has torn itself apart with a raft of proprietary formats, proprietary readers, store lock-in, excessive DRM and other abuses. Everyone wants a piece of the pie and everyone is too selfish to come together for their own mutual self-interest.

    At the very least there needs to be a single industry wide standard for delivery of books, for signing of those books, for activation of devices and so on. There also needs to be a single industry wide standard for the format of books that all devices at a minimum must support. I am surprised that publishers have let the market fracture like this. Don't they have an industry group that represents their interests? Why can't they impose and licence the standard rather than dancing to Amazon's tune? Do they really want to be slaves to Amazon? Shouldn't a publisher like O'Reilly be at the forefront of this?

    The net result of a single common platform would be a veritable explosion in ebook devices. Consumers would see the funky ebook logo on their device and confidently buy into the format since they still have the freedom to buy their books from countless vendors and play them on devices of their choosing. Of course, while things continue the way they are, the whole scene will be a wasteland of failed formats, consumer disinterest and 1000lb gorillas battling it out.

    This issue isn't exclusive to ebooks either. Digital video downloads are going down the same path and will suffer pretty much the same fallout. DRM is inevitable but at the very least it should be common to all devices and vendors.

  49. No DRM on Sony PRS-505 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know because i have one. All my PDF's for networking, e-books, rtf and text files work that i got from Bittorrent - of course I already own the books, but having them in one location makes it easy to look krap up on the road

    1. Re:No DRM on Sony PRS-505 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not the definition of DRM.

  50. REALLY?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using e-book will be a lot more convenient...

    When is the e-prof coming out?

    1. Re:REALLY?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      although its convenient but the thought of more waste is going to be produced is just intimidating. if the machine is broken and cannot be repaired, do we just throw them in the dumper? that's not very environmental.

  51. Re:If the DRM is th eonly thing you do not like .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He had all his repair manuals from the past two decades in PDF format? Or he went online and downloaded them? (Along with several other manuals he didn't buy previously?)

  52. Re:E-Book? I'd rather have a document reader. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    I have the smaller iRex device (the iLiad) and it's quite comfortable for reading scientific papers. If you crop the empty margins on a typical paper, the text size is only slightly smaller than on a printed page. For best results, however, you want something typeset for the device, like a PDF from feedbooks. There is quite a nice LaTeX template too, so if the sources for the paper are available you can easily recompile it for the device by just adding a \usepackage line.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  53. Re:If the DRM is th eonly thing you do not like .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    For the Sony Reader, it's all about the .lit format. You can purchase books in that format from most stores, it's very easy to strip the DRM post-purchase, and the .lit converts to .lrf (via Calibre) perfectly. It's how I buy all my books these days.

  54. No need to go through Amazon to load by Jonathan · · Score: 1

    No. you don't have to go through Amazon. You put things on a Kindle via USB. It mounts like a thumb drive and you just copy things over. The only need for Amazon's servers is to buy books.

  55. The publishers aren't the problem... by Garwulf · · Score: 1

    Speaking as a publisher, and one of the authors who was part of the push to make the e-book mainstream back in 2000 (a push by, I might add, the major publishers), I can tell you from experience that publishers aren't trying to push any genie back into any bottle.

    They do, however, tend to go with what is good business. As of February, e-books managed to get up to representing around 1.5% of the entire U.S. book market for that month - it's the highest they've ever been, and it took them over 10 years to get there...and that includes a massive push from 2000-2002 to make the things work. Yet, with the ability to read e-books on everything up to and including mobile phones, the e-book is still a niche market - therefore, it doesn't get a lot of support from publishers. They tried, and right now it's just a niche that can work as good marketing for the printed books, so it is treated that way. Newspapers, on the other hand, are close to becoming an endangered species, and have been on an increasing downwards slide for years. For them, it's go at least half-electronic, or die.

    So why newspapers and not books? The simple fact is that people don't consume books the way that they consume the news, or music, or movies. It's not the DRM that would have to change in order for e-books to be anything other than a niche market - it's the way people consume books. Right now, the printed book is the perfect fit for the way books are consumed by the majority of the market. The day that changes, the way books are produced and marketed will change too.

    --
    Robert B. Marks
    Author, Demonsbane in Diablo Archive
  56. eBooks pointless? by Johnson2206 · · Score: 1

    eBooks sound like great idea, and I'm sure they work wonders for some people especially the higher you go academically. However, doesn't it seem that these separate devices are soon to be pointless given the combined functionality of everything else? Like the loss of the PDA, tiny camera, mp3 player, and more all before the iphone/blackberry/smartphone genre could handle an ebook function easily. or am I wrong?

  57. hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    watch out for the swine flu